Tyrant Officer Unlawfully Detains Man Just To Get His ID

[@5thlevelweb887]

The copsplaining-gaslighting is the worst part. Disgusting.

[@McCucumber]

They are trained to lie to deflect and to gaslight. These are the worst our society has to offer. What this cop did was a crime in a fear in just society this cop would be criminally charged and awaiting his trial.

[@lisaa3978]

Lawsuit! When cops act like Gestapo, they must be fired, charged, and sentenced.

[@wingatebarraclough3553]

What if they act like Chekists? Look at the blue stripe

[@billsilvers6066]

When the police break the law, then there is no law, just a fight for survival.

[@Michael-mw3gz]

Cops seriously believe that the public has to do EVERYTHING they say. Its ridiculous.

[@artie218]

no they dont, they know its wrong, but what they seriously DO believe is they are likely to get away with it, there should be one ironclad law that if a cop commits a crime in one police department he should never be allowed to be in law enforcement anywhere ever again. They know how to do that, they make restrictions on criminal behavior all the time. Too many are allowed to believe they are above the law, and the supreme court is showing if they like you, you can be above the law too

[@Smoothstinger]

​@@artie218​ OMG, I'm not disagreeing with you, but you just said the exact same thing as Michael who said it with one sentence.

[@AW-ln7us]

What do you expect from highschool, football team bench warmers who couldn't get a scholarship for college? 4+ years of free passing grades so thy can play touch butt in shoulder pads doesn't make men! It makes swine!

[@billsilvers6066]

@@artie218 When the police break the law, then there is no law, just a fight for survival.

[@PaulWolf-r8k]

Disgusting cops should be charged with child endangerment

[@martj1313]

Oppression, assault, kidnapping and being a narcissist should be the charges.

[@artie218]

I dont think narcissist can be a charge, if that were the case, trump's felony count would double

[@SBU292]

This is not the first time these Officers have Violated somebody's Right's

[@joeblow2069]

The 500th time at least.

[@madmaximilian5783]

​@@joeblow2069but they all do it, even with their bodycams on...#Sonya Massey.

[@johnmc703]

Can someone please explain why the prosecution ir District Attorney have not layed charges on these police officers for blatant illegal false arrest, assault and kidnapping.?

[@user-knwimsodo321]

great.... they never ask a policer now...great... wow... see in 60-70yrs later.... wow

[@mr.behaving]

not even the first time that day.

[@1stamendmentmedia464]

"If I tell you to do something, you better be doing it" - somebody better check on this guy's kids

[@Smedley-gr3gm]

hopefully there is a 1983 Civil Rights suit against the county

[@jasoncody1537]

Yes they should be charged with assault and battery and have their certifications revoked

[@406walleyeslayer]

Another example of why we need 100% fewer cops.

[@meatpopsicleHW17]

I ate at a restaurant and got horrible food poisoning, therefore all restaurants must be closed 😅. Short sighted Marxist propaganda won't fix anything.

[@chrisshields934]

Both should be fired, Certificate stripped and charged with excessive force. Well the one who laid hands on the INNOCENT man should be put straight in jail. Found guilty until proven innocent because it seems that’s how he treats everyone he contacts, from his own comments. The other brainless cop should be charged with accessory to battery and excessive force and fired also. The lazy one who pulled up and got the explanation from the main douche bag should get a complaint on his record and made to start over and retrained.

[@lawrenceredmacher4382]

"we don't know what's going on" ah yes the most reasonable of suspicions

[@concernedcitizen1874]

@lawrenceredmacher4382 We've all heard that one before. It's almost as bad as the excuse of not knowing the actual law and being granted qualified stupidity. RAS must include actual facts of suspected criminal conduct tied directly to the detainee. Without a single articulable fact, any detainment is unlawful.

[@GLuck-r9e]

There is a reason they allow police departments to discriminate against anybody that is too smart and not hire them

[@Smoothstinger]

You forgot the worst part of his comment, "WE can call it CRIMINAL activity" the tyranny in this one is scary. That's a pure Gestapo mentality right there.

[@benanderson3041]

When a cops says we don't know what's going on its the only time they are actually be honest

[@aikanepono9980]

Alcohol and steroid abuse should be banned among LEO's!

[@Nutnboujee]

Yes!! They should be forced to wear drug and ESPECIALLY alcohol patches!!!

[@benanderson3041]

@aikanepono9980 it's required its part of the uniform

[@terryquinn7765]

Never, look at Ronnie Coleman!

[@bigjb99808]

These cops think because I say so is law. This man is about to get paid.

[@billsilvers6066]

When the police break the law, then there is no law, just a fight for survival.

[@dannysanders4327]

Thx for all you have done for our civil rights over the last decade

[@BuckleUpPansies]

Of course these cops should be held accountable. I am sick and tired of any cop being able to escape punishment via qualified immunity when the standard THEY use on citizens is...'Ignorance of the law is no excuse'.

[@michellefromindiana4406]

Mind blowing!! If the cops don’t know what u r doing they can call it criminal activity!! Keep earning the hate for all officers!

[@myaccount3402]

It's the "totality" of circumstances He is outside. He is in a bad neighborhood He is in an alley He is on foot See , this guy doesn't want to work the night shift forever.... He wants to wear a suit and be called Detective

[@Smoothstinger]

​@@myaccount3402and that's the sad part, those are the most flimsiest of circumstances to consider any criminal activity is afoot.

[@myaccount3402]

@@Smoothstinger right, totality mixed wifh generalities becomes totalitarian

[@Smoothstinger]

@@myaccount3402 Gestapoism at its best.

[@Richie66026]

Charged with assalt and deprivation or rights under color of law

[@Welderman007]

"We don't know what's going on but we can call it criminal activity". I seriously hope that a judge would not agree with this clown.

[@MrTheHillfolk]

Imagine if some NASA rocket scientists were gathered at a park bench,talking shop... These cops wouldn't know what's going on, and call it criminal activity..... I'm exhausted with copsplaining and the lies and excuses.

[@Smoothstinger]

6:30 "if I tell you to do it you better do it, if a police officer ask you who you are you better tell them". Gestapoism 2024!!

[@HowardCountyObserver]

"Since we don't know what you're doing, it's considered criminal activity. Because I said so!".

[@Smoothstinger]

No, it's worse, his claim was "We CAN call it criminal activity", therefore suggesting that he can be as subjective as he wants to consider it criminal activity. Gestapoism at its best.

[@HowardCountyObserver]

@@Smoothstinger True. I reworded a bit differently. Either way, it's BS!

[@Gov.audits]

Charge them! EVERY officer that blatantly breaks the LAW must be charged!

[@gingw7333]

Standing on your Constitutional Rights is considered criminal activity by law enforcement. Let that sink in.

[@Smoothstinger]

Gestapoism at its best!!!😢😢😢

[@inspectorpro]

He's not the only one out there. That's the scariest part.

[@mikeparker8919]

Somebody needs to hold these bully tyrants accountable.

[@UNCIA-e5x]

Stupid is stupid does. There is no excuse for this behaviour from these public servants to use force against this inocent man just because he would not ID himself no crime was commited. Disgrace to the badge and there oath. They both should be fired and never work in law enforcement ever.

[@an-dt7129]

That cop even said before assaulting him, there's nothing actually suspicious. Then, his partner assaulted this man in front of his child. Assault and battery, endangering a child, violation of civil rights, false detainment, harassment and a gauntlet of other charges should be filed against those cops. Both, the one who thinks he can do whatever he wants belongs in jail, his partner should never be allowed to work in law enforcement, ever again, for letting him do this in the first place. It's the responsibility of 'good' officer's to make sure the bad cops don't get away with this behavior. That's your reputation on the line.

[@AndyLong]

At the VERY LEAST the original officer should be fired.

[@fettel1988]

That kid's definitely on a new spectrum after this. The one that decrees there's no good cop

[@mitchelliwilliams2414]

We have been on that spectrum for decades cops are nothing but a waste of taxpayers dollars they spend more time being sued then stopping crime well you don't really want to stop yourself.

[@chuckjones3516]

Officer’s like this is going to get other ones hurt.

[@hbhkennel918]

When?

[@mgreenesco9955]

The other one was there and participated willingly!

[@benanderson3041]

We can only hope

[@sirdirtydog705]

⁠at their next call for service!

[@gregleach4956]

When will police begin receiving charges for their criminal behavior? Nothing will change until that happens.

[@myaccount3402]

This is the ultimate goal of the propaganda.... The laws are created to shelter a certain class... The class that can afford a gated community

[@TheHistorybear]

Both those psyCOPaths need to be in prison. Both the crimes Batoussai mentioned and 18 USC 241 & 242.

[@fordsilver3181]

That child had a great education in not trusting LEO”s.

[@janemiettinen5176]

So, people who know their rights usually have warrants?! Thats absurd. And what kind of criminal mastermind takes their autistic son with them, if they’re up to no good? Even more absurd.

[@davidtrickey9863]

How is this not kidnapping.

[@davidtrickey9863]

@@friedpotatoesa1083 not for sovereign citizens though

[@6StimuL84]

It literally was, after aggravated extortion/making terrorist threats and aggravated assault and battery.....

[@rarefruit2320]

Psychopaths call it what they want, when they want

[@jerrybushman]

Cities, towns, counties and states need to weed out officers like this that do not know anything about our rights

[@chuckjones3516]

And we wonder why people hate cops.

[@HowardCountyObserver]

I don't wonder why at all.

[@d.okezie]

We don't wonder at all... we know!!!

[@MrTheHillfolk]

The ones that wonder,just haven't had it happen to them yet. Or maybe it has, and they have Lickus Bootitis. Don't get the itis,man, that's the worst itis to get. 😂

[@brothaman1312]

no gods no masters

[@reiw5802]

And do you know what cops blame? KZbin. They are incapable of taking responsibility.

[@xjackiex24]

✌️😎📸💯 Bama Cam.. 😮 you better be doing it. That's how they all think.

[@justind7211]

Battery, official oppression, false imprisonment, kidnapping, child endangerment.

[@Ioulou66]

Another example of how law enforcement treat the public in the country where they claim to have more freedom than every other country.

[@michaela6902]

Let's be honest. NOTHING will happen to these guys. They cover it up and hope it goes away

[@davelordy]

It's amazing the shit they allow into US policing.

[@johnnytx45]

Walking around in the neighborhood is suspicious. Wtf

[@clbcl5]

I think back to Dustin Hoffmans improvised line in Midnight Cowboy.....I'M WALKIN' HERE....I'M WALKIN HERE.

[@kevgray.]

A similar sort of thing happened in the late 30s early 40s ... Show me your papers!!!

[@daveypir]

ANY force, including a detention involving no touching, which would still be force... the THREAT of force IS force!

[@allemander]

This is textbook psychopathy and an instructional guide on how to create victims of the state.

[@grumble_one]

"We can call it criminal activity", GTFOH

[@cajunrandy2143]

needs a battery charge from touching the child too

[@DaOneSteveRogers]

Mos definitely, Battousai, the 👮 who detained the man should be charged with battery. Further, if and when this cop gets offered a plea deal or reduced charged - DA should demand that his Leo Certification be revoked ! This officer violated a citizen’s rights. Also, the two officers should be suspended without pay. The 2nd cop 👮 stood by and let his psycho partner assault & violate a man’s rights ??!!

[@purselmer5931]

That little boy is the perfect candidate to be a police officer. HE might make a difference.

[@LugerLau]

The coverup is worse than the crime. TELL US EVERYTHING

[@Jim1Tom]

Prison!

[@JayNuffer-wo5yl]

Official oppression

[@ThierryVlaminck]

Indeed there was criminally insane activity but from two thugs some idiots gave a badge to, coppers that aren't aware that they are a possible lethal danger for the public.

[@Nutnboujee]

People who don’t want to cooperate with UNLAWFUL orders know their RIGHTS! “We can call it criminal activity “ You cannot just make stuff up SIR! We have NO DUTY to obey unlawful orders! In fact, the Constitution demands that we NOT cooperate in illegal activity!😡

[@michaeldyer63]

Welcome to Oklahoma law enforcement! Just one of example of how backwards they operate by blatantly ignoring the actual law and enforcing their feelings. Traumatizing a six year old and now being protected by their department and city. Hopefully the man who was violated gets justice.

[@WaltvanWasatch]

The Battousai one of the most important members of our civil rights violations need to be documented community. My thanks for his exceptional clarity and analysis in these examples. The officer should of been immediately arrested and charged. It should of been that day after the police chief viewed the bodycam evidence.

[@whatilearnttoday5295]

I really liked the quote you used on the thumbnail. It's just ridiculous how openly he violates the law and how used to violating the law he is.

[@victorlorraine6596]

Charged with every little thing they would charge a “civilian” with

[@nicholastheofrastou1953]

This agency is trash

[@256weknow]

Thank you for doing what you do

[@iainherridge6253]

What a tyrant ‼️‼️

[@mikeelliott4155]

Yes the officer should be charged , Cops should be held to a very high standard , If every " BAD " cop was held accountable for his or her actions , we might start having respect of them again ... Ask that kid does he have respect for cops now ...

[@deecee6013]

You know it is a shame the way they put these people on the street and have no idea what they are doing. And worse is the fact that they have no idea about the law. Something has to be done and soon. How much more do they want the public to put up with. They are going to create a situation that nobody wants. Stay Safe and GOD BLESS....

[@josephadamkovich1887]

Proof that anyone can get into law enforcement.

[@MrTheHillfolk]

Yep the local sheriff department had a flashing billboard out on the road for a few weeks, they're hiring. Hs diploma or GED is all ya need.

[@royalfinest]

Funny when the stupid cop said "WE DONT KNOW if theres a criminal activity". He dispelled his own Probable Cause and RAS all in the same sentence 😂

[@GLuck-r9e]

I’ve literally been pulled over by police that did not know what detaining means. Like I kept asking if I was free to go no so I’m being detained. No, you’re not being detained you’re not in handcuffs… I even tried to explain to her that if I was not free to go, that meant, I was being detained. Her and the other cop got so mad they did put me hand in handcuffs. 😂

[@JoelS-b4q]

...when you hire folks that barely pass high school.

[@WTF198]

This cop needs a PYSCH evaluation and a GED asap. Holy.

[@ZXLMaster]

The legislative body is responsible for drafting and enacting laws, which serve as the foundation for lawful directives. Regrettably, this particular officer held the mistaken belief that his position as a police officer automatically rendered any of his commands lawful. ❤

[@johngalt97]

1:33 'faith' is belief without an objective reason, 'confidence' should be the standard…

[@HowardCountyObserver]

8 billion 👍 on that!

[@RyanBlockb5]

Hopefully for Halloween his son will now want to wear suit, as Civil Rights Attorney. Kids in suits are super cute. 👔

[@Sunstar808]

What’s absurd is that officers continue to demand ID, and violently take ID, without reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime and rarely fired/charged for doing so.

[@lightningdave3970]

Even after the cop does his Copsplaining. Which was wrong. I think there needs to be a mass audit of this town..this cop was in the wrong. You even heard the guy start to state it isn’t a stop and ID state. Before he was taken to the ground. I hope the a-hole gets arrested for his multiple counts of breaking the law.

[@TheBlackHole2024]

They should be fired and jailed. We know they won't because they're W

[@Needfreedom8953]

The two criminals with badges should be fired and charged! Unfortunately, the constitution only protects officers. Free people, who the constitution was meant to protect, has consistently had their freedoms stripped by the courts when cases have gone to judges. Even after you famous case, cops still do the same thing without any punishment. I do not call it punishment if you have to wait 3-4 years for a jury verdict. While waiting the officer still commits the same offense. During that time they claim the are ignorant. And if you win, you get paid by your neighbors who did nothing to injure you. We live in a police state and the constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper that people still cling to that has no teeth, unless held by the cops crying officer safety.

[@markmills344]

I watched the entire body camera footage and the cop said "I've got reasonable nuff (enough) suspicion" Reasonable nuff suspicion - must be some new legal doctrine 😂

[@stefanlarsson3827]

From Sweden! You are truly proffesional! Try to spread you in Scandinavia!!👌👌👍👍😃😃

[@TalkingGIJoe]

No stop without cause The police cannot stop you, question you, detain you, arrest you, search you, or charge you, without your consent, if there is no victim. Ultimately, the “administrative courts” cannot fine you or imprison you without your consent. But if at any point you “understand” (stand under their authority), agree to anything, or give them the artificial legal “person” NAME, you are consenting. THE TWO BASIC TYPES OF ENCOUNTERS: 1. Consensual, in which you are free to leave at any time. 2. Detention/Seizure/Arrest, in which you are held by “an assertion of authority”, or by physical restraint, against your will. In any detention/seizure/arrest the “Peace Officer” MUST have “probable cause” and/or a “reasonable suspicion” that you are committing, or are about to commit, a CRIME against a victim. The accuser bears the burden of proof to reasonably establish your CRIME. In any detention/seizure/arrest the “Police Officer” MUST establish that you are “acting” in “joinder” to an artificial legal "person" NAME created by the State and controlled by statutes. The Officer bears the burden of establishing your freely given CONSENT. A “Police Officer” who stops you in the course of your lawful business, without your consent, or “articulable probable cause”, is assailing you. DEALING WITH ASSAILANTS: 1. Identify your assailant, their motive and jurisdiction. 2. Require verification of a CRIME (no crime = no jurisdiction). 3. BE POLITE, STAY ON POINT. You have the Right not to be “arbitrarily” stopped, detained or arrested [by chance, whim, or impulse]. There must be an “articulable” and “reasonable suspicion” that you are involved in a CRIME against a VICTIM, and a WITNESS [can be a “Peace Officer”] with first-hand knowledge and evidence who is willing to write an affidavit under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability, making the accusation of the crime. You have the Right not to answer questions. You have the Right not to provide government issued ID. You have the Right to ASK QUESTIONS! source: www.educatedinlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Living-in-the-Private.pdf

[@AreYouSerious-210g]

A sovereign citizen has entered the thread. Be advised sovereign citizen legal strategies have no legitimate basis. Using these strategies with a cop will likely lead to your arrest. Relying on these strategies in court will likely lead to your conviction. -Gary K Be well, be kind, and lead a good life

[@TalkingGIJoe]

@@AreYouSerious-210g we are all sovereign citizens... we just act like slaves. It isn't a legal strategy and apparently you didn't read or comprehend. It is ok, most can't or won't.

[@AreYouSerious-210g]

@@TalkingGIJoe I for one am not a sovereign citizen nor do I act like a slave. What group of people are you referring when you used the word “we”, as in “we are all sovereign citizens” or “we just act like slaves”?

[@TalkingGIJoe]

@@AreYouSerious-210g People create governments to serve, not rule. A re-presentative government, elected freely and fairly, is by definition a Public Trust instituted to serve Private Sovereign People in the Common Law Jurisdiction. Such a sovereign government is an unincorporated Common Law Assembly, or a “body politic”, NOT an incorporated “body corporate”. The Sovereign People place their Trust in the governance skills of their elected re-presentatives, who are elected into “office”, not into “power”. Your re-presentative “goes in your place”. The Sovereign People are the employers of their re-presentatives and all government employees. Without exception, the employees of this Public Trust are “public servants”, working for the Private Sovereign People, who are the free men and women of the Nation. Everyone in government service, from your Head of State, the Queen, who governs “in the right of [the people]”, to the lowest employee, derives their limited authority from the Private Sovereign People, and each such “public servant” has a Fiduciary Duty to serve as a Trustee for the Private Sovereign People who are the Beneficiaries of their Public Trust. Sovereignty resides in the People, whose power is the source of Law. Sorry... most people are completely inured in their paradigm and cannot, even with the greaest effort or presentation of fact, break free. So it is with kind regard that if you just want to argue, find someone else. If you want to learn a little something, read the reference I cited.

[@AreYouSerious-210g]

@@TalkingGIJoe I simply responded to your comment with a brief statement about myself and asked a clarifying question to clear up some ambiguity about your usage of the word “we”. I am aware that some people like to bait others into arguments in comment sections. I am not that type of person. I kindly ask that you answer my question without any further insinuations that my comprehension skills are somehow inadequate. Your long-winded ‘cut and paste’ reply did not address my question.

[@AriettaGooden-rs4hz]

That cop is definitely corrupt thinking he can just tell people what to do and they have to listen. If you have committed no crime they have NO AUTHORITY over you to make you do anything!

[@judithmatthews8460]

These cops idea is that the law is what they say it is. They think they have been given a badge to abuse people and children. But the responsibility lies with those who appoint and fail to educate such officers, or when they breach rights fail to hold them accountable. They make injustice out of legal activity. If the prosecutors fail to charge them with battery they are derelict in their duty because they most certainly would have charged a citizen who assaulted someone in this way.

[@ronsauls8305]

That revenue collector is unfit. Shame on him.

[@-108-]

The assaulting officer should get 5 years mandatory; His partner, 1 year mandatory. They should both be fired and have their LE creds permanently revoked.

[@mr356porsch]

ANYONE ELSE . . . ANYONE without a badge and gun comes up to you and “I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them.”― John Wayne "The Shootist

[@crystalclearaudits9086]

Sue them for millions!!!

[@ThePeachtree69]

“We can call it criminal activity.” Both officers need to be fired and their superiors need to feel some pain for not acting appropriately immediately and allowing these two idiots to go at terror to the public like this.

[@marw1920]

So many POLICE violate ID law - it begs the question - why is OUR government failing to clamp down on repeat offenders of criminal police misconduct . The educated know “the United States Supreme Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for refusing to present identification." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260). The same Court warns police, “The freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.” (U.S. Supreme Court, City of Houston v Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 1987). "An illegal arrest is an assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260). The Supreme Court warns "Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law!” (Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622) Highlighting police responsibility in affirmation that "the knowledge that a municipality will be liable for all of its injurious conduct…should create an incentive for officials who may harbor doubts about the lawfulness of their intended actions to err on the side of protecting citizens." When officials of our government entertain such un-American and subversive anit-rights policy we must 'identify' and investigate these agent provocateurs who abuse the powers we entrust. We must demand accountability and take back control of the politically powerful institutions, now shams, that were designed to give us a voice. Civilians need to have enforcement oversight over their peacekeepers to reverse the centralized stronghold. Removing the militarized police agenda prone to oppressive policy that have deteriorated constitutional safeguards "established to maintain and protect individual rights".

[@jayandreas1131]

When you’re a fascist it is really appealing to get into law enforcement.

[@hawkeyejohnny968]

Both should be fired and stripped of their certification so they can never do this to another person. This looks like a hiring pattern in this geographic area.

[@DjVortex-w]

It's highly ironic that the United States is one of the very few countries where citizens can refuse to identify if they are not suspected of any crime, yet the police automatically demands ID from everybody they come in contact with, everywhere in the country, without fail. The irony is that in most other free democratic countries it's the exact opposite. For example my country is a full-on "stop-and-id" state, where you are required by law to identify if a police officer demands it, no reasons need given, yet the police very rarely does that. They could do that, but they don't.

[@Kathy-zx5bu]

These two should definitely be charged with battery. They should also be charged with something for the horrible scare they gave that little boy! That was CRIMINAL! Thank you for the information and knowledge. I really appreciate it.

[@krpinckney]

They should both be fired! At any time, the second cop could have interjected. But he didn't. At least that 6-year old learned young how dangerous cops can be when they are tyrants. He will never blindly trust police now!

[@andyrosenthal2230]

I'm GLAD the young man got to see this. Who would want to be a professional tyrant thug?

[@Gabe00723]

The Battousai Crew!

[@PastorSiddell]

this is how the disconnect starts...that child will never forget this

[@Swauvehouse]

Cop for Halloween is pretty scary.

[@chuck8094]

Father and son taking a walk. Cop: We don't know what you're doing. Attack! Attack! Attack! How do they find people so stupid that they don't know what walking is?

[@rickytheplug54]

Thanks you for what you do you are the best to do it

[@cuteshoesandbags8094]

"I'm straight up. You better do what I tell you..." Paint my house! Sir yes sir!