Tyrant Sheriff's come running for a camera and get schooled #tyrants

[@viclionsden6752]

That cop sums up why so many hate the dogs

[@SofaKing-pp1pn]

Funny men, one for the funny papers. Keep at it Aussie Nathan.

[@matthansberry5795]

Australia is buggered with these brown shirts

[@matthansberry5795]

The smart ass buddy Ppl saying it’s their property it’s our property sick of it same as the Council

[@pvtjohntowle4081]

The Sheriff officers are the ones that failed the police entrance exam 😅😅😅😅

[@GTHO1970]

Media is always there with Camera's. What a fool!

[@Yahuah780]

At the start of the video, if you're going to call yourself an audit KZbin channel, make sure you cross when the pedestrian light is green

[@scotto7047]

Gave me a giggle...

[@JohnnyBoy357]

Nathan, do more of these.. I don’t answer questions 😂😂

[@darrylbirt6049]

Hard ass sheriff's 🤣 Like you said. Glorified security guards!

[@dannyzuco1]

Section 6 - (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a journalist has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises open to the public that is located outside of a building in which the court is housed or is sitting for the purpose of making a media report if the journalist is not obstructing or otherwise impeding access to the building.

[@bluelakeaquaruim7002]

sheriff dribbles shit .. lol ......

[@zanetrotter]

@@addryanneadamsyn9206 An Act is a statute or law passed by both Houses of Parliament that has received Royal Assent.

[@lindalonergan7887]

Court property is governed under the court security act not the same legislation as other public property. The act also permits them to search and seize at check points within court property. Familiarise yourself with relevant legislation.

[@hankcuccina5260]

Good advice Linda.

[@peternolan952]

I have taken the time to read it and from what I understand Aussie Nathan was well within his rights at the time according to Part 2 Entry and use of court premises 6 Right to enter and remain in open areas of court premises (1) A person has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises that is open to the public if- (a) the person has complied with all relevant orders made by a judicial officer (whether under this Act or another law) in respect of the person, and (b) the person has complied with all directions or requirements made by a security officer under this Act in respect of the person. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a journalist has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises open to the public that is located outside of a building in which the court is housed or is sitting for the purpose of making a media report if the journalist is not obstructing or otherwise impeding access to the building. (3) This section has effect subject to the following- (a) the provisions of this Act, (b) any inherent or implied jurisdiction of a court to regulate its proceedings, (c) any other Act or law about persons who may be present in a court or court premises. (4) Nothing in this section confers a right on any person to enter or remain in a correctional centre for the purpose of seeing another person appear before a court by means of an audio link or audio visual link. And this section. 13 Power to ask for identification particulars (1) A security officer may require a person who is entering or in court premises and whose name or residential address is unknown to the officer to disclose the person’s name and residential address or to disclose the reason for the person’s visit to the court premises, or both, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that- (a) the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement, or (b) the person has committed an offence in the court premises.

[@crosseyedone7960]

Inside of building is the "property" the Act refers to. I've been there done that.

[@johnsmith-ip8wt]

@@peternolan952 So come and kiss my ass Linda

[@fireskycam9889]

@@peternolan952 It is an offence to take photographs or to use audio recording devices in courtrooms and court premises. Permission to use these devices must be sought from a judicial officer. Given that Nathan was on the "Court Premises" once he passed the bollards it could be taken that he was committing an offence. New South Wales Court Security Act 2005 - Sect 4 Definitions - "Court Premises" In relation to a court means the premises or place where a court is held or that is used in relation to the operations of a court, and (Without limitation ) Includes (a) a Forecourt, courtyard, yard, parking area, toilet facility, hall, corridor or other area used in conjunction with the premises or place. (b) (c) and (d) are not relevant to this matter. "Recording device" Means any device capable of being used to record images or sound (or both) including any of the following devices- (a) a camera (b) a mobile phone that is capable of recording images or sound (or both) (c) and (d) do not apply in this case. "Journalist" Means a person engaged in the profession or practice of reporting, photographing, editing or recording for a media report of a news or current affairs, information or documentary character. New South Wales Court Security Act 2005 - Sect 9 (1) A person must not use a recording device to to record sound or images (or both) in Court Premises. www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/csa2005205/s9.html While I know the above bounces back and forth a bit I do find that the Senior SGT that came along was an arrogant clown. Couldn't shut his mouth and he should have a close read of Division 2 of the following legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2005-001#sec.6

[@peterbuckley3877]

The courtyard he is referring to is owned and maintained by Parramatta Council and us public access, the court property is the other side of the bollards.

[@peterfarrelly483]

Thanks for your work mate. It is so important.

[@JohnSmith-pl2bk]

(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a journalist has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises open to the public that is located outside of a building in which the court is housed or is sitting for the purpose of making a media report if the journalist is not obstructing or otherwise impeding access to the building. Part 2 Entry and use of court premises

[@baobo67]

Correct, If one is a genuine Journalist. Nathan is not a Jounos bootlace Nathan is just an insolent ignorant prat.

[@Kianiji18]

According to the legislation's definitions in section 4, he is not a journalist. CSA 2005 s. 9 Use of recording devices in court premises (1) A person must not use a recording device to record sound or images (or both) in court premises. s. 4 Definitions Journalist means a person engaged in the profession or practice of reporting, photographing, editing or recording for a media report of a news, current affairs, information or documentary character.

[@lukezach8802]

Great work..tyrants have told us what to do for way to long and its time to know our laws as public citizens

[@kinchegayowie6167]

What crimes act is that in?

[@kinchegayowie6167]

@@addryanneadamsyn9206 that's because you are looking at commercial courts and they commit fraud everyday , its only 'shit" as you do not comprehend, and you would not be privy to what is actually going on , like the 367 page document in WA SUPREME COURT which proves their fraud

[@kinchegayowie6167]

@@addryanneadamsyn9206 look up the Clearfield Doctrines

[@Rawkus105]

Try ask them the hard questions, like why do they think they're above the law.

[@Caynewest]

This idiot sheriff is a joke. He’s got nothing.

[@zanetrotter]

actually hes right An ACT is LAW. An Act is a statute or law passed by both Houses of Parliament that has received Royal Assent.

[@Outtahell]

Excellent video Nathan 👑🔥

[@karenpayne1011]

💯 agree...Nathan is knowledgeable of the laws. Much respect for his work.

[@karenpayne1011]

Love and appreciate your work, Nathan.

[@toker5536]

Dont forget we have NO rights only inferred rights and some human rights, its about time we did but no political party has the balls to do it

[@stevesmith236]

A security officer may, on providing certain information to the person and giving a warning as required under the Act, require a person entering or in court premises to disclose their name, address and reason for the visit to the court premises, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds, the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement or that the person has committed an offence in court premises: s 13.

[@choppersghost5439]

Fact remains: the property belongs to The People !!! He was not trying to enter regardless. 👍🙏🙌

[@mmmail1969]

He was neither entering, nor in the court...he was OUTSIDE...where there is "No Expectation" of privacy!

[@HeatherBelle6]

Acts are NOT Law, cops never ever know the Law. The only job that doesn't know their job.

[@brenz9774]

The gift that keeps on giving😂

[@mmmail1969]

OUTSIDE the building, a person has generally no expectation of privacy, meaning, a person would reasonably be able to film. Obviously, INSIDE the building is much different situation....generally, there would be no particular reason why say, a public foyer area could not be filmed in.....but it's a more grey area...but OUTSIDE, fine! And courts [funny enough] in Australia [and other Common Law countries] have made this clear!

[@sproket168]

O so silly. An Act is VERY much Law. An Act is legislation that's been passed into law.

[@Quincy556]

I would expect nothing less from a country that started out as a penal colony.

[@hankcuccina5260]

Hahaaa!! good one.

[@kinchegayowie6167]

Well , that was based on lies, they sere soldiers , sent out to decimate the natives , as was Lt Cook landing on this land mass , total freemason fabrication

[@addryanneadamsyn9206]

Not a thinker, are you ?

[@shaemeek5269]

Oi careful mate. Our country didn’t start out as a penal colony. First Nations peoples ran this nation like a MF boss before us white fellas invaded their land

[@hankcuccina5260]

?@@addryanneadamsyn9206

[@Caynewest]

I hope these clowns don’t have guns. This is kindergarten mentality from a gun toting lunatic. This is a clear display of a person who knows nothing about the law. He just keeps constructing lie after lie to hopefully get his way.

[@jasonmanukau6978]

Always use the words... "Implied right of Access" No shut gates etc... your not inside the court

[@AllaNoN10078]

Dont stand on this blade of grass... that blade of grass...

[@nobodyreally0162]

This is from the Act he just mentioned… (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a journalist has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises open to the public that is located outside of a building in which the court is housed or is sitting for the purpose of making a media report if the journalist is not obstructing or otherwise impeding access to the building. So the cop is talking poops.. next time pull up the act on your phone.

[@zanetrotter]

And also ACTS are the main source of LAW in ACT ( CANBERRA), and they are LAW which are passed by parliament, thats how they become LAW

[@baobo67]

Nathan has studied the Law. Which one? US Sov and as he continues he is branding himself as one.

[@zanetrotter]

sorry Nathan but an ACT is a law mate An Act is a statute or law passed by both Houses of Parliament that has received Royal Assent.

[@noelpaintonsmith8091]

This guy needs to read the Court Security Act that he keeps quoting... 13 Power to ask for identification particulars (1) A security officer may require a person who is entering or in court premises and whose name or residential address is unknown to the officer to disclose the person’s name and residential address or to disclose the reason for the person’s visit to the court premises, or both, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that- (a) the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement, or (b) the person has committed an offence in the court premises. 1. You never entered or were "in court premises." You were outside- even if that's court property, it's not "in court premises." 2. He never alleged that you were carrying a restricted item or an offensive implement. 3. You did not commit an offence.

[@Kianiji18]

Check again. He did commit an offence. CSA 2005 s. 9 Use of recording devices in court premises (1) A person must not use a recording device to record sound or images (or both) in court premises. s. 4 Definitions Court Premises, in relation to a court, means the premises or place where a court is held or that is used in relation to the operations of a court, and (without limitation) includes- (a) a forecourt, courtyard, yard, parking area, toilet facility, hall, corridor or other area used in conjunction with the premises or place, and (b) a part of premises or a place used as an entrance to or exit from the premises or place where the court is held or that is used in relation to the operations of the court, and (c) a part of premises or a place being used to enable a person to appear before the court by means of an audio link or audio visual link, and (d) any part of premises or a place used in relation to the operations of a court, or referred to in the preceding paragraphs, that is also used for other purposes. Journalist means a person engaged in the profession or practice of reporting, photographing, editing or recording for a media report of a news, current affairs, information or documentary character.

[@steveroperfilms]

The second cop on the scene was from The Quick Response Unit.

[@dansha80]

Sheriff is and always was there for the people to-enact on behalf of the people the law of the common law outside of that they are not a sheriff but just an idiot in uniform, as for the oldest in Australia they are, but again to enact the law of the King according to the common law act, which is and always will be the law of this land first and foremost.

[@TheHomeloanking]

The Court Security Act offers an exemption for journalists. The police cannot convert a right into an offence/crime. Court Security Act 2005 NSW 6 Right to enter and remain in open areas of court premises (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a journalist has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises open to the public that is located outside of a building in which the court is housed or is sitting for the purpose of making a media report if the journalist is not obstructing or otherwise impeding access to the building.

[@johneire5016]

Yes if he had known this they would have been fucked.

[@TheGigashadow]

Nice audit mate, just one thing, an Act is a law... "An Act is a statute or law passed by both Houses of Parliament that has received Royal Assent. On Royal Assent, Acts are given a year and number. Once an Act is formally enacted it can generally only be amended or repealed by another Act.". Just a little friendly info as I have heard other display the same misunderstanding regarding this subject.

[@adamjones9591]

Absolute Dogs!

[@darhman5299]

You're a legend Nathan! Love the content mate, great channel

[@hankcuccina5260]

Nathan needs to watch more episodes of Long Isle Audit.

[@kerii2488]

Thats an american auditor, you do that in australia with our laws you will be arrested, charged and found guilty. They have a the american constitution which grants them those rights, ours does not have as many freedoms as theirs does.

[@mrwilson7617]

Island

[@hankcuccina5260]

Isle means and is short for Island@@mrwilson7617

[@hankcuccina5260]

@@kerii2488Nathan still needs to watch long Isle Audit, Sean does his audits with manners and knowledge, he has it down pat. And in Australia, it is different state by state.

[@AllaNoN10078]

Holy siet the running man 😅

[@ETERNITY777]

😡😡 LOOK AT HIS FACE 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪

[@lukezach8802]

Please keep it up because there are not many people like you around

[@mikebauer3776]

so glad you found the file bro, this was rippa

[@kinchegayowie6167]

The PARRAMATTA COURT HOUSE is a corporation, the Parramatta Court House, is a lawful court , learn the difference , your name in all caps is a legal fiction/corporation and that is how they do commerce , your either a living man or women or a corpse

[@shaemeek5269]

Mad respect brother! Just stumbled upon your channel. Are you the Streets LA of Sydney or what? You seem to know your shit! Much ❤from Melbourne

[@Auditingaussie]

Thank you I appreciate your support cheers

[@Craig.catfish]

Facts 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@nbonassi83]

That sheriff reminds me of Dewey from scream....

[@JulieIelasi-lt7yp]

Great videos, Nathan keep em' coming 😅❤

[@BUBBLES231]

Great video Aussie 💥🎥💥❤️🥰

[@HarryWilliams-ru4qs]

What about ASIAN tourists, they walk everywhere filming everything, DON'T SEE NSW POLICE ARRESTING THEM.

[@AD-53]

Tyrant could hardly breath He was so excited to trample on your rights the smugness and lies make me sick

[@user-hm9ft3fd9o]

Looks rattled 😂

[@pvtjohntowle4081]

Use of recording devices in court premises (1) A person must not use a recording device to record sound or images (or both) in court premises.

[@pvtjohntowle4081]

You weren't in court premises. Just a bunch of bullies in a uniform. I would have let them arrest me. They don't' have the power to arrest anyone.

[@crosseyedone7960]

One thing, you cannot film artwork in Australia as it is a breach of copyright.

[@TEN4Gaming]

Nobody has a clue😂😂

[@timothydoult6025]

Without limiting subsection (1), a journalist has a right to enter and remain in an area of court premises open to the public that is located outside of a building in which the court is housed or is sitting for the purpose of making a media report if the journalist is not obstructing or otherwise impeding access to the building.

[@fireskycam9889]

THE SENIOR SGT NEEDS TO READ THIS BEFORE TELLING PEOPLE TO IDENTIFY. Court Security Act 2005 No 1 Div 2 13 Power to ask for identification particulars (1) A security officer may require a person who is entering or in court premises and whose name or residential address is unknown to the officer to disclose the person’s name and residential address or to disclose the reason for the person’s visit to the court premises, or both, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that- (a) the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement, or (b) the person has committed an offence in the court premises. (2) However, a security officer may not require a person who is in possession of a restricted item or offensive implement to provide information of the kind referred to in subsection (1) if- (a) in the case of a restricted item-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is permitted to possess the item in court premises under section 8 (2), or (b) in the case of an offensive implement-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person would have been permitted to possess the implement in court premises under section 8 (2) if the implement had been a restricted item.

[@kinchegayowie6167]

The "officer" has no lawful authority as he has his own abn and he is a foreign agent, working for a US vested corporation called NSW POLICE , on the other hand, a constable has arresting rights as he is under the crown and is protected, the cops are not , see Enever v King HCA ,Tasmania 1906,

[@AdrianDunshea]

This is the group consisting of complete untrained. This is not good

[@anthonyoz6113]

I am a fan of law enforcement BUT when they don't know the law and try to squash your rights I have a problem with them.

[@fireskycam9889]

HERE'S SOME HOMEWORK FOR YOU SNR SGT 13 Power to ask for identification particulars (1) A security officer may require a person who is entering or in court premises and whose name or residential address is unknown to the officer to disclose the person’s name and residential address or to disclose the reason for the person’s visit to the court premises, or both, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that- (a) the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement, or (b) the person has committed an offence in the court premises. (2) However, a security officer may not require a person who is in possession of a restricted item or offensive implement to provide information of the kind referred to in subsection (1) if- (a) in the case of a restricted item-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is permitted to possess the item in court premises under section 8 (2), or (b) in the case of an offensive implement-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person would have been permitted to possess the implement in court premises under section 8 (2) if the implement had been a restricted item.

[@kinchegayowie6167]

Do not confuse a Constable , with an Officer, as one is lawful ,and the other just a tax collector and a traitor ,with no arrest powers, only inside their corporation world, every one needs to wake up

[@bellycopter1980]

No sir you are dismissed

[@garyemerson9310]

THE YOUNGER SHERRIF POWER TRIPPER SECRET AGENT AUSTIN POWERS

[@jimmicrackhead12]

Sheriff? You watch too much American TV- we have officers in Australia, NOT Sheriffs 😂😂

[@fireskycam9889]

Court security Act 2005 No 1. Division 2 Identification of persons 13 Power to ask for identification particulars (1) A security officer may require a person who is entering or in court premises and whose name or residential address is unknown to the officer to disclose the person’s name and residential address or to disclose the reason for the person’s visit to the court premises, or both, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that- (a) the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement, or (b) the person has committed an offence in the court premises. (2) However, a security officer may not require a person who is in possession of a restricted item or offensive implement to provide information of the kind referred to in subsection (1) if- (a) in the case of a restricted item-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is permitted to possess the item in court premises under section 8 (2), or (b) in the case of an offensive implement-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person would have been permitted to possess the implement in court premises under section 8 (2) if the implement had been a restricted item. This bumwipe Senior SGT should have a close read of the above and outline clearly what the offence was that was committed in the Court Premises.

[@blakeosr8221]

He did he stated clearly that recording on court premises is prohibited

[@gregglumac745]

Police have rights to ask people to move On

[@timothydoult6025]

disclose the reason for the person’s visit to the court premises, or both, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that- (a) the person is carrying a restricted item or offensive implement, or (b) the person has committed an offence in the court premises. (2) However, a security officer may not require a person who is in possession of a restricted item or offensive implement to provide information of the kind referred to in subsection (1) if- (a) in the case of a restricted item-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is permitted to possess the item in court premises under section 8 (2), or (b) in the case of an offensive implement-the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person would have been permitted to possess the implement in court premises under section 8 (2) if the

[@pvtjohntowle4081]

Nathan make a complaint to the Chief Sheriff's officer Use of recording devices in court premises (1) A person must not use a recording device to record sound or images (or both) in court premises. Maximum penalty-200 penalty units or imprisonment for 12 months (or both). Note- This subsection only prohibits the use of a recording device to record sound or images (or both) and not any other use of the device. For example, this subsection would not prohibit a person from using a mobile phone with recording capabilities to make a telephone call, but would prohibit the use of the phone to record court proceedings. You sre not recording court proceedings the kunts are out of their jurisdiction

[@fireskycam9889]

Senior SGT is totally petty

[@Craig.catfish]

Dont come here telling me facts 😂

[@pvtjohntowle4081]

9 Use of recording devices in court premises (1) A person must not use a recording device to record sound or images (or both) in court premises. Maximum penalty-200 penalty units or imprisonment for 12 months (or both). 9A Prohibition on unauthorised transmission of court proceedings from courtroom (1) A person must not use any device to transmit sounds or images (or both) from a room or other place where a court is sitting, or to transmit information that forms part of the proceedings of a court from a room or other place where that court is sitting, in any of the following ways- You weren't in court premises, you were outside the premise. You weren't "in a room" their powers only extend inside the court complex. You are a journalist doing a documentary outside and you are not obstructing or impeding access to the building. News crews are all the time outside Downing Centre Local Court and Parramatta local court with their cameras.

[@realemonful]

Man! This KZbinr is desperate for attention lol...I couldn't even get past 7 minutes... What was the big deal with why he was so concerned where he wasn't supposed to film from lol... Like what was he even trying to record? lol

[@gregglumac745]

People should obey the law

[@shawnbartley9223]

Time to start FOI requests on this lot your well on the way Nathan, your nailing it, just listen to this clown spitting his scripted response out as quick as he can so he doesn't mess it up! lol

[@peterpiper9606]

Never admit to being O.K. He may be a criminal I was asked, I am C.J.

[@anthonyswann9167]

Really this is not India.

[@gregglumac745]

Police are the law

[@gregglumac745]

Police are good people

[@pvtjohntowle4081]

Police can’t tell you to move on unless they have a reason. The police must have a reason to tell you to move on. Some reasons include: Getting in the way of people or traffic, Harassing anyone or making other people afraid, Being about to commit an offence like buying or selling drugs, Being drunk and disorderly, or Acting in a way that is a risk to other people. If the police can't ask you leave for recording a video these Muppets certainly can't 😅😅😅

[@gregglumac745]

Police has rights to ask for id

[@265hemi7]

Why are they foreign contractors ? . 👿🖤🤔

[@bedfordonthebeach]

Yes finally an Australian auditor…. Great work…. Thanks for your courage and brilliance.

[@gregglumac745]

Police has more rights

[@gregglumac745]

Police can drive fast

[@giovanniperretta-lopes874]

to dig a hole 9:12 25:25 defeat! lol

[@newman653]

These fools are a joke .

[@newman653]

​@@addryanneadamsyn9206ouch ! That reply is lamer than you .

[@mrwilson7617]

Poor muppet is so desperate to be right he literally can't breath. He needs to read the entirety of the ''Act'' he refers to. He is wrong.

[@zanetrotter]

actually Nathan is wrong, an ACT is LAW. An Act is a statute or law passed by both Houses of Parliament that has received Royal Assent.

[@timothydoult6025]

security officer means- (a) the Sheriff, or (b) a person appointed by the Sheriff under section 21.

[@alch3myau]

lol. hes stumbling oooh after you saying an act is not a law made him shake rofl rofl his mate trying to hide the laughter

[@nidal1661]

Indeed it's a GHreat Video

[@whathappenedtoaustralia6696]

If you learn what you were talking about, you would understand they were just bullying you you’re allowed to stand at the front you were just not allowed to record court process and what they say is there property no you’re right it is public property you’re not allowed to record in court rooms probably not allowed to record in the lobby but you are allowed to record at the front they can’t stop you from that

[@timothydoult6025]

an indian...what would he know about Australian law

[@mini696]

Mate you need to learn the laws before you try this again.

[@kinchegayowie6167]

You need to learn the difference between law and legislation, acts, statutes , directions, and rules , the first one is your unalienable rights, used with common law , the other is corporate law, as your viewed in your all caps name as a corporation, and your under Admiralty law, = military law and until you correct your standing, you continue to receive the constant gut kicking from the land pirates and treasonous governments

[@karenpayne1011]

Nathan does knows the laws

[@kinchegayowie6167]

you need to learn that the cops do not work with "law" as they are a business and only deal with statutes, rules, directions and legislation, they are not the law, and legislation requires consent

[@johneire5016]

If you are a journalist you can be on court property and record .

[@greg9345]

Land down under isn't Aust anymore its a cesspit.

[@MrTom7516]

America fuck yeah!

[@kinchegayowie6167]

@@MrTom7516 Matt Damoooooooon

[@incarsound]

For starters, you jaywalked at the beginning of filming lmao

[@taumatawahanga3650]

your incorrect Nathan.... what a joke bro, blue line thugs all over the world

[@JulieIelasi-lt7yp]

The is like from American videos haha 😄