उन सभी बेकार के अल्टकॉइन्स से कहीं बेहतर है जिनका कोई उपयोग नहीं है।
@MayaDavi-yi7ln2 ай бұрын
AWS में साथ निवेश करके खुश हूँ!
@JahirulMomin-ln5ny2 ай бұрын
मैंने X और Facebook पर बहुत से लोगों को इस बारे में बात करते सुना है।
@raghu_rock2 ай бұрын
AWS की यात्रा रोमांचक होगी!
@waichui29882 ай бұрын
France should vacate their seat for Indonesia or Brazil.
@mistermiau99492 ай бұрын
dokładnie te żabojady do szamba wysłać
@madsam0320Ай бұрын
Brazil, no representative from South America in permanent members of UN Security Council.
@adsilaabhaya152 ай бұрын
AWS86X पर आपके चयन पर विश्वास है। इतनी संभावनाएँ 🚀
@jeetuyadav42402 ай бұрын
पूरी तरह सहमत! चलो AWS को आगे बढ़ाएं! 🌟
@krupakhatua2 ай бұрын
यह जीवन बदलने वाला प्रोजेक्ट है।
@munjudevi10912 ай бұрын
अंडरवैल्यूड प्रोजेक्ट।
@elysiaorabelle2 ай бұрын
💖 TON और AWS86X के अंतर्दृष्टि के लिए बहुत धन्यवाद। दोनों भविष्य के लिए ठोस पसंद लगते हैं 💖
@ShikhaKumari-jv3gm2 ай бұрын
AWS में साथ निवेश करके खुश हूँ!
@naitiktomar9192 ай бұрын
AWS संभावनाशील है! इस यात्रा का हिस्सा बनकर खुश हूँ।
@AniketVerma-s5q2 ай бұрын
मेरे दोस्तों ने मुझे इसे खरीदने के लिए कहा।
@Punamdevi-g1d2 ай бұрын
AWS कम से कम LINK को जरूर पछाड़ देगा।
@rishipaljaat13232 ай бұрын
AWS के भविष्य के लिए सकारात्मक महसूस कर रहा हूँ!
@ShaunKheng2 ай бұрын
I agree with Kishore. UK has no business in UNSC. India should be replace the has been.
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
UK is no longer Rule Britannia. After Brexit, it's truly past its sell by date.
@teogeorge2203Ай бұрын
@@ShaunKheng Agreed but India is not a suitable replacement. She tends to go with the wind, I should say majority. She is not decisive and independent.
@CountingStars333Ай бұрын
@@teogeorge2203India never goes with the wind. That's UK. Always going with whatever America says. India goes with what's good for the global South,
@teogeorge2203Ай бұрын
@@CountingStars333 Let us hope she can be decisively independent now. Watch her for next couple of years.
@AbdiFarah-f2sАй бұрын
India, with its fascistic government and the treatment it mets to its own Muslim citizens, in no way deserves a seat at the UN or anywhere else. A country that is trying to disenfranchise millions of its own people should be condemned and ostracized in no uncertain terms. Mr. Muhbubani of all people should know that.
@HPankhania2 ай бұрын
Is UN even relevant anymore?
@CountingStars333Ай бұрын
@@HPankhania It's always relevant.
@kennedy6618Ай бұрын
I do agree UK should concede the UN seat to Brazil and France to the African Union. One seat to each continents. North America, South America, Asia , European Union or Russia and African Union. 6 seats is better than 5 seats. Right now America has 3 seats because UK and France are the servants of Uncle Sam. Goof luck world!
@teogeorge22032 ай бұрын
Given the seat from UK to India, is similar to taking from a lapdog and given to another lapdog. Doesn't help to better the world.
@philips17472 ай бұрын
Very true
@SRRMCSАй бұрын
Bharat a lapdog to whom dear?
@joyceching6487Ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣... 🤣🤣🤣... 🤣🤣🤣... ... ... 👍👍👍👍👍!!! 😊
@teogeorge2203Ай бұрын
@@SRRMCS My friend, you think and you will realise.
@CountingStars333Ай бұрын
@@teogeorge2203 India isn't a lapdog to anyone. Never has been. It was part of the non aligned movement in the cold war. It is an ally of both Iran, Israel, Russia and Usa. There is no country with such diplomatic ties. Justify your sentence or stay mum.
@Therealclips-ib8bm2 ай бұрын
You lost me when you said South Africa should represent Africa. It doesn’t look like you understand Africa at all.
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
Is South Africa not in the continent of Africa?
@Therealclips-ib8bm2 ай бұрын
@@scalarnai yes it is. But it isn’t very dominant. Also, you’d get to understand more of what I mean in the future. Besides, it’s mostly controlled by European Africans. Which is going to be a bit complicated because Africa’s population of blacks is about 97%. While the Arab Africans are about 2 point something. Then the European Africans are the smallest percentage. You’d be having the by far minority determine the future of the entire continent. I just don’t think that would be the best.
@Ray5C0rn3rАй бұрын
@@Therealclips-ib8bmagreed
@CountingStars333Ай бұрын
@@Therealclips-ib8bm What you want Nigeria to lead Africa?
@Therealclips-ib8bmАй бұрын
@@CountingStars333 I don’t know men. I just don’t think South Africa would be the best in this case.
@sportingusaАй бұрын
India is happy to sell her alliance to the highest bidder. Indonesia, Brazil and South Africa are all better candidates. Indonesia stand up to the tremendous pressure applied by G7 to invite Russia to the G20 summit. Similarly S Africa brought Israel to the ICJ. Only Brazil has the stature to represent Latin America. These are countries that has shown leadership and gumption. India politicians love to talk big but unable to solve their own huge domestic problems and inequality. In fact they take advantage of these religious and caste issues to consolidate their power. We don't need these kind in the UNSC.
@vishwas186821 күн бұрын
good joke, i am sure Zelensky will use it
@markc61402 ай бұрын
Indian politicians always dream big but unable to achieve. Modi wants to make India a superpower by 2047, it’s really a laughing stock. Did Modi who run the largest democracy in the world manage to alleviate millions of Indians out of poverty? I predict in next 30 years, India will still be an impoverished country and will find it difficult to achieve developed status least to be a superpower. Cut down on defence budget and help the ordinary Indians who are struggling to make ends meet. Resolve your huge internal domestic problems first - rampant corruption, racial religious violent, primitive caste system, infrastructure deficiency, income disparity, abject poverty, etc.
@vishwas18682 ай бұрын
Jesus will save u like he has saved millions in Africa and made it a rich continent
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
Apart from the caste system everything that you criticise india for also applies to the UK.
@vishwas18682 ай бұрын
The UK introduced the caste system by distorting the un-hierarchal Varna system.
@sheilakrish12 ай бұрын
They hv a class system instead@scalarnai
@xcel5203Ай бұрын
India's best and brightest are still migrating to the UK for education and jobs . India continues to languish at the bottom of human resources scale whether it's equality,nutrition, gender equality ,education , housing etc . A country of 1.4 billion is capable of a pathetic 4 trillion GDP only with an unremarkable PCI . But it aspires to a lofty status in the world order - nothing but hubris !
@ahsansyed4612 ай бұрын
According to Kishore Mahbubani, India qualifies to resolve issues between Moscow and Ukraine. Please resolve issues at home first. See Manipur, Kashmir, Khalistan.
@philips17472 ай бұрын
Very true
@tarunkuwar1978Ай бұрын
Khalistani, Manipur and Kashmir are te###sism problem, we are dealing with them
@bond3972 ай бұрын
Very true, India rightly deserves this place. Japan, Germany, Brazil and South Africa too needs to be in the UNSC.
@Peter-q9dАй бұрын
❤❤
@1x2y3z99Ай бұрын
The English Lion is TOOTHLESS now. Time to take a walk in the park. 0:32
@saran.gandhiАй бұрын
The UK would even consider doing it, if France would be removed too, but if that happens, then Who represents Europe on the UNSC?
@sridharns11032 ай бұрын
I Agree that India deserves place in permanent seat at UNSC as it has secured decent space at Global.
@louistan75602 ай бұрын
Exactly right.
@limkheakwei4412Ай бұрын
I have been a keen follower of Prof Kishore. However in this topic I do not agree with him for several reasons: 1) There were no agreements among nations when the UN was formed as to who should the permanent members of the Security Council. Is it based on size of population,land area, land and sea area, economy or military strength ? 2) Even if Britain were to agree to give up its sit, it is not Britain's right to give it another country of its chose. 3) What about other countries ? Do they not have the right to have a say on who should be there ? The Islamic , African, Spanish /Arabic /Turkish/French speaking countries ,EU members,Asean countries have a say ?
@alyasagan3620Ай бұрын
I agree...UK is a downhill power and India upcoming world power
@cresenteayo3638Ай бұрын
From early 17th century to the middle of 20th, UK was a great empire whose colonial possessions stretch from east board of north american continent, and spread westwards to the Far East, Africa and to India the biggest of all. About 300,000 Brits controlled 1/3 of world's population back then. After World War II, Britain was replaced by its former colony the USA, as the dominant force in global geopolitics. Now it faced internal turmoil, religious conflict on whether the Brits had still the majority citizens that call themselves English, Brits or stick to tradition. Split in between the Brits no longer worshipped the Anglican Church that English King Edward VIII established with he himself the Head, but Islam imported abroad by series of mass migrations from former colonies to UK. The drawback of colonial past. Now UK is disintegrating from within as a nation state. The power and influence on global stage had subsided that it could not even properly governed itself, much more dictate other states what form of governance or behavior to follow. Hence, UK losses geopolitical standing at the UNSC. It's role by now insignificant, and still attempted hard to play the role of great power, but reduced to being an stooge that highjacked peace in Russia-Ukraine War which could have been prevented in the first place, had not former PM Boris Johnson intervened, and who advised Zelensky to go to war with Russia, instead of peace.
@pmm72682 ай бұрын
Asian union should happen. Russia should also be part of that.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
There can only be one global order. Otherwise, well you know.
@programs232 ай бұрын
Brilliant Idea 💡
@sunnycriti9809Ай бұрын
Perhaps it is time to create a better organisation then the UN
@Snownam227Ай бұрын
absolutely true
@GlobalDrifter10002 ай бұрын
Wow! I’m sure the Brits are thrilled by KM’s outrageous condescension He is a world class ball buster..
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
The Professor is being charitable and pragmatic as the UK is no longer a world power. It increasingly has much socio-economic decline and should attend to its own malaise and leave it to truly global giants to oversee global geopolitics. In fact France should be replaced too.
@GlobalDrifter10002 ай бұрын
@@scalarnai nonsense
@xcel5203Ай бұрын
@@scalarnai India is still a third world country which can't make cars, trains ,planes, mobiles ,decent roads and has 80 of the most polluted cities in the world in the top 100 .
@CountingStars333Ай бұрын
@@GlobalDrifter1000 Found the brit.
@GlobalDrifter1000Ай бұрын
@@CountingStars333 found the pinky
@kenlek8692 ай бұрын
The UK has fallen far since WW2 ended, and it's decline is far from ending soon. Time for it to give up any pretensions to Great Power status.
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
It's become a basketcase.
@stormtrooper8420Ай бұрын
India is a poor country
@rigdendorji4458Ай бұрын
Power is not given, it is taken either with force or persuasion. Neither UK is in defeat nor India in a position to cause it. US took over from UK as world power after 1945 only with a trust that former is an extension (Anglo l-Saxon) in North America. So what rational UK has to give its power to India?
@selvakumarsundramkumar924Ай бұрын
Yes sir you are absolutely right Don't keep toothless tiger Need to reshuffle
@edisonchan50292 ай бұрын
This kisshore suggestion that UK give up UN permanent member because it has no independent view except to follow US, I think is good. Kisshore suggesting India to replace UK is a wrong choice, because India has no independent view too, as modi leans towards US; so what's the difference ??? Logical choice is South Africa, firstly Africa continent has no permanent member, secondly South Africa has shown global leadership by initiating a legal case against Israel in ICJ on genocide and South Africa is a peace loving country with no axe to grind (unlike India against Pakistan). Moreover, corruption in India including the political elites means decisions are always unfair. Kisshore is wrong, very wrong.
@sergiodasilva6505Ай бұрын
As a South African I would love that...... BUT we have way too much issues at home There is about 77 murders a day in a year in SA that's close to the death rate of the gaza war. We are seen as a failed state in the international community. As for making the case against Israel we have not down that about Ethiopia or Sudan in Africa or picked up a case against Azerbaijan and turkey for the genocide against the Armenians. Before we can even get to that we need to fix most of our domestic issues and work towards a global power in the mid range and have a military that is world class before suggesting that we get a permanent position in the security council.
@sergiodasilva6505Ай бұрын
Moreover south africa has so much corruption. Once we resolved our issues and raised ourselves in a higher position in the global stage then yes.
@davemorgan6013Ай бұрын
I agree.
@GamarSusulan2 ай бұрын
Weather big or small countries shall have the right to make contributions and let the majority rules.
@calvinang1Ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@HiHi-ld1pb2 ай бұрын
आपके विश्लेषण की सराहना करता हूँ! आपकी पिछली सिफारिश ने मुझे सिर्फ एक सप्ताह में 10% मुनाफा दिया, OMG!!! मैं AWS86X, ETH, और SHIBA पर विचार कर रहा हूँ। इन पर आपका क्या विचार है? AWS86X एक अच्छा दांव लगता है, लेकिन आपकी राय सुनना चाहूँगा।
@bkparikhАй бұрын
Why can’t India just be added rather than replace the UK in UN Security Council?
@spikermike2843Ай бұрын
Lol, India still looks up to the UK as a master so dream on.
@INDIANSARESICKMENOFASIA2 ай бұрын
India does not dare to say this, thus, she summons an Indian (Indian ethnicity) expat to say that.
@2009hakimifyАй бұрын
You can’t be in border conflict with your neighbor,and also ask for a permanent seat There is a conflict of interest
@gshen2312 ай бұрын
I am sure China will support this and don’t veto against India like it did every time till now 😊
@Ashutoshkumar-ji7vh2 ай бұрын
China will veto against it. Because China knows only country that can stand againt it is India. And it doesn't want any other power in region.
@Western_Decline2 ай бұрын
Stop treating China like an enemy and it might happen.
@rogerfaint4992 ай бұрын
When did China veto against India? There is no record that India was formally recommended to have UNSC permanent seat and neither was it ever being discussed.
@cashmerecat92692 ай бұрын
You're talking out of thin air..show us any valid news about China vetoed India.
@bingliu-chinaАй бұрын
中国会支持,但是英国会一票否决。哈哈
@donaldjoseph3903Ай бұрын
Not only UK, all 5 permanent members.. let others have a chance..
@INDIANSARESICKMENOFASIAАй бұрын
They have had their chance during WW2 and the only thing that held them back was cowardice.
@chandrashekhardandekar1260Ай бұрын
UK's stature is no more relevent to UNSC better it vacates it seat for India.
@devendragautam84762 ай бұрын
Let's make the UN the League of Nations 2.0. Smaller countries do not want another hegemon on the high chair. If the UN cannot be democratic in its true sense, small and island nations should stand for its disbanding.
@kcthunder76822 ай бұрын
Agree and France must vacate hers for Indonesia
@Gman9792 ай бұрын
There must be a prerequisite that Mahbubani will not touch on the rivalry between China and India which will put him in a very uncomfortable situation. 😅😅
@edwardcheng5439Ай бұрын
UK is just an extension of US, the 51st state, followed by Japan and Taiwan, of course it needs to make way.
@wh4ufАй бұрын
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. Taiwan is an integral part of the greater China.
@alantan9863Ай бұрын
Agree. Britain should vacate. Let, Delhi take the seat.
@RandomVideoClix2 ай бұрын
Never to happen. Only chance is expanding UNSC PM.
@patrickgz2 ай бұрын
more calls for britain to vacate unsc seat for india needs to come from within indian diplomatic circle, not from retired singaporean nri
@donhuang9855Ай бұрын
Facts on the ground suggest that the UK is no longer as important nor as great as they once were, especially after the UK left the EU, and has since lose its "position of strength" in Europe, and by extension the world. Moreover, given the special relationship and its "blood is thicker than water" with its Anglo-Saxon cousin, USA, the UK's geopolitical interests would certainly be in sync with the USA. Hence, UK's UN permanent UNSC sit would be deemed suffice to requirement; therefore, ought to be given to Brazil (representing South America) or South Africa (representing AFRICA) instead of India, considering that India is mostly align politically with the Collective-West in general. At best, the UN could expand the UN permanent UNSC sits to include Brazil, South Africa and India, but without any VETO power, plus a rotating UNSC sit every three years between the UK and France.
@apDOLAYАй бұрын
If india get permanent seat, we are fcked
@dennyliu74942 ай бұрын
The US will never allow that to happen. The US wants to maintain Anglo-Saxon's stranglehold on the world and will never allow their cohesive power to subside.
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
The decline of the US is gathering pace and is inevitable too.
@bentony7548Ай бұрын
UK definitely will use veto power to decline vacate seat for India. period. what is India going to do against this? 😅😅...
@a.shikatoswu54002 ай бұрын
Even though I don't like India's overconfidence attitude i do fully support replacing UK with India because UK has no criteria to be a member of UN security council members.
@koruptorbesar91412 ай бұрын
So a country whose strength cannot even win one single gold medal in Olympics, with US$ 2500 per capita, lack of sanitary system, ranked 111 in world hunger index, ranked 93 in corruption perception index, considered as great power and deserve that seat? UK in all those parameters ranked far higher still. I just find the discussion is absurd.
@INDIANSARESICKMENOFASIA2 ай бұрын
Beg for another 100+ years and it may happen. 😆30+ years of begging since 1994 is child's play. Source: JSTOR Title of article: INDIA'S PERMANENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE U. N. SECURITY COUNCIL : CHANGING POWER REALITIES AND NOTIONS OF SECURITY Author: Manoj Kumar Mishra (Indian) What article said specifically: India has been bidding for the permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council since 1994 when India made its intention clear in the General Assembly that it was prepared to bear the responsibility of the permanent membership of the Security Council.
@Santeh60Ай бұрын
😂😅😂 No way! Over my dead body.
@brianliew59012 ай бұрын
Allow the UN to vote on this.
@SwatantraNandanwar2 ай бұрын
That's a great idea. Do it tomorrow. Britain has declined after years of right wing Govts under Tories. It has less and less influence. It started with Thatcher and ended with Sunak the billionaire.
@CattleFarmer6672 ай бұрын
UK should vacate but not in favor of India. When UN vote, every country has only 1 vote regardless of population, GDP or military power. Unless voting right take into these factors, then India is no different from UK or Pakistan for UN permanent seat.
@rijgurung56382 ай бұрын
First India should make toilets for every hut, provide drinking water to every family, have a proper primary education system and health care system for the lowest rungbof the society, India will automatically get a spot in the high table of powerful nations. Look at the interior Bihar, UP and West Bengal....their living conditions are no better than Burundi and Lesotho...except for certain pockets. We wish India it's rightful place but has a long arduous unfinished agenda to complete. It must improve it's HDI.
@ahsansyed461Ай бұрын
Modi has no balls to deal with issues at home. See how he failed in Bangladesh, Afghanistan,Iran, Maldives, Sri Lanka and Nepal. He thinks small, jumps high then falls deep down. India needs a broad minded PM. Modi is living 50 years behind time.
@Facts..CheckerАй бұрын
India has a highest population today, democratic but chaotic too, undeveloped and its potentials havent been fulfulled as fast, balance, on time and systematically. Hence, India is lacking the leadership and role credibilities, except hyping about the forecasts or expectations of certain interested parties and chauvinism complex to some degree!
@kashimoorthymoorthy4695Ай бұрын
South Africa India joined India permanent membership it will be end of world India loping at vested interest for beto power
@RAJDHART2 ай бұрын
Uk should vacate for India & France should vacate for S Africa. UN bodies should undergo big reforms if it wants to survive .
@pumalee19972 ай бұрын
Then, the BRICS countries will become the United Nations
@george1737Ай бұрын
Its very true, uk has no significance, they are surviving with the loot and doing slavary job for usa. France same path. Let then leave unsc and include India and a muslim country.
@AdrianCHOY2 ай бұрын
Heard UK is gonna be Islamic state over time. :-) I think the Security Council should have Islamic representation. However, if the council don’t feel the same, UK should bow out.
@Kevin-fq3zh2 ай бұрын
there is no such thing as a “UNSC chief”. but thanks for the comedy
@SurbhiChanchal2 ай бұрын
It is. A search won't hurt your brain. You should know that facts before speaking
@Kevin-fq3zh2 ай бұрын
@@SurbhiChanchal i should be telling you that. you don’t even know the facts. bet you haven’t even attended a UNSC session in person b4
@SurbhiChanchal2 ай бұрын
@@Kevin-fq3zh I don't but i am very sure that this who is speaking was ex- chief and he is from singapore and he have attended so many session so he knows what he is saying
@Kevin-fq3zh2 ай бұрын
@@SurbhiChanchal he is a Singaporean with Sindhi roots & served as Permanent Secretary in the Singapore Foreign Ministry as well as Singapore’s Permanent Rep in the UN New York. I did not take issue with what he said (which are irrelevant anyway). I took issue with the channel for calling him a UNSC “Chief” when no such appointment exists
@pisablavatsky-cb3dd2 ай бұрын
Nazze west puppets can't accept the truth.
@sadanandgote55442 ай бұрын
What are advantages of UNSC
@CheeLiekHoАй бұрын
I disagree that India is the third most powerful nation invthd world now. First it does not have a military industrial complex. All its weapons, from aircraft carriers to submarines and planes are imported. It does not and cannot even design and build a fighter jet locally.Secondly per capita incone is not even ranked in the top 20s amongst the 194 countries in the world.
@chaz46092 ай бұрын
Jai Hinduja. Any Bankrupt member should automatically be asked to resign from UNSC
@daddy92672 ай бұрын
Thailand or Vietnam would be much better representatives for asia,
@philips17472 ай бұрын
Agree
@hikmatullahsahib2 ай бұрын
Agreed UK should vacate its UNSC seat for India and USA should vacate its UNSC for Pakistan, while France vacate its seat for Algeria. These three so-called super powers have no more legitimacy to lead.
@kamaljeetsingh14672 ай бұрын
Aur UK kardenga 🤦🤣 bhai apna khud ki groupings banao jo apke liye UNSC mein vote karenge!!
@slashblog2 ай бұрын
LOL. Vishwaguru should create his own UNSC with permannent seat for himself.
@SukumarfineArtPhotoАй бұрын
What a JOKE!!!
@Who-lg9myАй бұрын
why India? What's the criteria for a place in unsc? population? wealth? military? nuclear power? influence? growth? Great power of the day... is india a great power? how world you measure power? why do so many Indians want to go uk and not so many British want to go India? is India really a great power that many Indians want leave India and never return?
@silversurfergw2 ай бұрын
No.. China and Russia should leave the council and start a true united nations for the global majority... The G7 and those who wish to remain their lackeys can remain in ny.
@thapa1851Ай бұрын
This professor is talking ridicule
@rockmusic1752 ай бұрын
Europe should only have Russia, USA for North America, China and India for Asia, Brazil for South America and two seats for Africa.
@philips17472 ай бұрын
Only china from Asia
@user-xc4nu9lh6t2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 comedy
@Quest3669Ай бұрын
😂😂 u shud vacate first ur seat .. hired paid
@aryanhan506Ай бұрын
Nope, India can’t make it……..sorry…
@jennifervillarta8600Ай бұрын
Lol India wants to be relevant.
@anoopmohite9612 ай бұрын
Mungeri lal ke haseen sapne 😂
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
The Professor is always right and brilliant.
@INDIANSARESICKMENOFASIAАй бұрын
This Indian had overestimated his worth. Is he a leader of any country?❌ Does he represents the view/views of a country?❌ Is he a politician in office?❌ Does his words carry any weight? ❌ A "has-been" ✅ Why even bother listen to his ramblings? 🤭
@harbinger6562Ай бұрын
I think the seats should be given to developing Nations not those who are using 🇺🇳 to exploit Countries where they have caused division ❤️🇺🇳🇮🇩🦾😇👋
@philips17472 ай бұрын
Thirld world countries like india shud not be in UNSC P5. UK is a first world country and also a founder member and also winner of WW2.
@petervote79142 ай бұрын
If UK gave up UN seat, no one will take UK seriously anymore.
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
No one takes the UK seriously. It has had 6 prime minister in 7+ years. It's a basketcase.
@firetree20072 ай бұрын
he said that since he knew that will never happen
@babakool10592 ай бұрын
Fake nonsense news..😊😊
@tvm738272 ай бұрын
I hope you are not paying this guy for this content. He was already irrelevant and is even more so now. Which democratically elected government in the UK (or any other country) will dare to do anything like this. Most governments don't even apologize for the atrocities committed by their predecessors. This guy is insulting your viewer's intelligence
@ShaunKheng2 ай бұрын
Kishore has the courage of conviction to say what is right or needed to be say. Of course no government will be willing to give up such a prestigious and influential position, needless to say. They will not vote themselves out. This is a great start and more voices should be added.
@taiwanstillisntacountry2 ай бұрын
LMAO, every permanent Member of the UNSC voted against little-India, when they asked to have a permanent Seat.
@smirza860Ай бұрын
Or they can be sweepers of the room where 5 permanent members sit ?
@MaverickJitin2 ай бұрын
This author is a joke
@Myanmartiger9212 ай бұрын
Nope
@not_so_genius36422 ай бұрын
Curious to know what made you feel him like a Joke?
@pisablavatsky-cb3dd2 ай бұрын
You are a joke😂😂
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
@not_so_genius364 He's a pro China shill 2
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
Professor Kishore is brilliant.
@donkeykong5162 ай бұрын
Why should UK advocate seat for India? Because India has large poverty ridden population?
@scalarnai2 ай бұрын
Because India has overtaken the UK as the 5th largest economy.
@isleephungryАй бұрын
@@scalarnaiminimum wage India :207.04 USD UK: 1830 USD😂
@xcel5203Ай бұрын
Professorji is fishing for a job in Modi govt .
@philips17472 ай бұрын
Please every body vacate, UNSC belongs to india. It is india,s personal property.
@VictimHood-qv1hx2 ай бұрын
Kishor is basically a pro China ideologue , hence view everything he says with utmost disdain
@mikekok2 ай бұрын
India has 'o. Merits to deserved the seat in the UN