ULTIMATE HOLY GRAIL ROULETTE SYSTEM!

[@sonnyzaro7664]

This is what happens when the wheel doesn't cooperate. There is an alternative, 1, learn to read the reader board for your next bet or 2, fall back on the original. The Martingale as shown can bleed your bankroll. There is always an escape & alternative to get you out of a jam. I'm going to submit to TRM several ways to do so. Keep an eye out next week for the sampling. It will change the way you play.

[@princessmilania]

Thanks Sonny, you always focus on how to bet more wisely instead of just trashing someone else's system. Look forward to your comments.

[@sonnyzaro7664]

@@princessmilania Nice of you to comment. I'm not an expert on this game, don't believe anyone is. I'm an escape artist. I use tools to get myself out of jams & want to share those alternatives. Roulette is a game to be used short term. I'm in & out of a casino before they even know I was there. It's not for me about the money, it's about conquering a giant. You have a small window of opportunity to smash & grab & I use it. I'm not in a casino to win bundles, I'm there to take what I can muster in under 20 minutes & gone. Sometimes breaking even is a win. Why? Because you just overcame a built-in edge the casino has on the game & overcame those odds. It's the art of escape. I've dealt roulette for many years & a pit boss for many more. I've learned throughout the years, accept what the moment brings & leave, it gives the casino, no chance in getting it back. Small battles win wars, linger to long & you maybe sorry. Play safe when up & leave. Cycles change on a moment's notice, don't be there when it does.

[@sewwhat6525]

Thanks for sharing your knowledge & experience Sonny, RM has mentioned your book do you know where i can get it?

[@sonnyzaro7664]

@@sewwhat6525 I published the book in 1999. No publisher would publish it cause they believed it wouldn't sell. So I published it myself & sold out of all 10,000 copies. The cost of doing it myself was horrendous. I made a miniscule amount, & wasn't worth republishing. You may find it at a used book store, it's called Get it, Get out. I just had a conversation with TRM & he's going to use my methods of getting out of messes this coming week. Systems that aren't cooperating & bankroll is being diminished. How to get out of that situation by using methods I use. It will all be explained on the channel, hope you'll tune in.

[@JoeKind1958]

@@sonnyzaro7664 Excellent advice that is greatly appreciated. At 65 years old I was a slot player for most of my life up to 3 years ago when I started playing roulette. Playing slots was always the same old routine. Take $200 to the casino for a night of fun and that night of fun most always ended up being leaving the casino minus my $200. Now here in Pennsylvania I can have my fun playing online usually ending my roulette session only down slightly or being ahead. Knowing when to stop playing was my hardest challenge. Even on good nights when everything was going my way, that can change at a moments notice and you need to stop. Easier said than done as the gambler in me always thinks "oh it will hit on the next spin". Its a matter of learning self discipline, thats the most important part. Thanks for your wisdom. 😁👍☕️

[@seancasm00]

My concern with these fixed movement systems is focusing on reaching session profit before resetting. The profit movement is fluid, so we need to assess recovering as close as possible and then reset

[@johnwaugh4680]

Yep...I only double up once and stay with that bet until I get back to where I was and then revert back to my original bet. I don't worry about trying to get to a session profit with higher bets.

[@AusWolf1]

@@johnwaugh4680 I couldn't agree more! Chasing profits is almost as bad as chasing losses. Once you're up, reset, and carry on playing safe.

[@ductorman]

I love this channel. I like to run my strategy alongside the one that RM is running to see how mine compares. So many of these strategies win well by cashing out with a couple hundred profit often in just a few minutes. If we follow this channel we will all become Roulette scientists Hat tip to RM from a most grateful student!

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Thank you so much love having you as a member of this community

[@davidreed9300]

You need to have a goal….300, 400, 500. Whatever it is, you walk when you get it. Some of these systems, like the Holy Grail, require you to play for large number of spins…they are grinders. If you want to win at roulette, play a system that will achieve you goal within about 20 to 25 spins. If you keep playing after that, you should use a different system entirely. The longer you play, the worst the wheel will get. Playing systems that require you to sit and grind out will eventually break you. This is why I don’t care for his 15 minutes of play time. I would have walked at 400 profit. Screw the clock.

[@johnwaugh4680]

Exactly...I have tried this system on the simulator and the similar system where you change to another 12 after it wins. With $10 bets I get out if I can reach $200 in winnings or $100 with $5 bets. I find the system normally turns sour if I continue on and I refuse to double up more than once or twice to try and get back in profit as the bets can get ridiculous to try and dig you out of a hole as proven with this video. Also regardless of system I always play the European wheel and put a saver on zero. I know it doesn't come up often but how many times do we see RM sometimes with a big bet getting caught out on zero?

[@gregorysteck8296]

I agree. First 150.00, you walk no matter what. I have found that playing craps, roulette that you will always win in the first 30 minutes. First 150 you walk.

[@avantgardedoboj4810]

TAKE A PROFIT,WHEN A PROFIT.

[@ChrisWall999]

If this doesn't tell people to walk when they are up a good amount, I don't know what does ;)

[@mikedemayo3283]

The HOLY GRAIL ROULETTE system has never failed Me .....I play with small units and cash out profit ... when I'm in profit after a spin , I restart ....

[@mvlivinthedream9601]

What is your walk away amount? I try to win $200 and walk, sometimes I lower it to $100.

[@mikedemayo3283]

I play 1st 12 ,,, 2nd 12..... ( 1,00 unit ) .... If 3rd 12 comes out I dont place a bet untilI 1st or 2nd 12 comes out again.... I start with a 150.00 bank roll and leave when I'm 30 bucks up........ when I'm playing ,,,I restart when I'm in profit,,, both ways to bet are on the roulette masters ... I just tweeked them alittle ... He the ( RM) puts an amount to reach to restart..and the betting can get very high and take the bankroll..... the reason I wait for 1st 12 and 2nd 12 to hit after the 3rd 12 hits ,, because 3rd 12 can repeat several times ...... I know that when I walk with 30 buck doesnt sound like alot of money,,,,,, I 'm building my bankroll bit by bit ........ In time I'll be able to increase my bets, and I'll be able to make more profit........ ( NOTE) I started my bankroll with 40 bucks .. 20 cent bets.... Now I have a $150.00 bankroll .. I'm up to $1.00 bets......still building..

[@mvlivinthedream9601]

@@mikedemayo3283 smart slow and steady.

[@itzamia]

@@mikedemayo3283 Keep the game plan going. If you stick to it and leave after a modest win, or cut off and walk after certain amount of loses, this can be a profitable system.

[@ronniebababooe7584]

Wait till u build to 1k! then u can lose everything in one day of bad luck and start again :) cheers. @@mikedemayo3283

[@barringtongilbert9230]

29.05 ...Up $550 ..... THREE MINUTES and 20 seconds later....$1500+ DOWN!!! Wow...Just shows the benefit of having a set winning or losing goal before you start. Crazy!

[@chriscopperton2757]

I have experimented with the same betting progression as the second one betting on 2 dozens and I have had the same outcome..........even with changing the dozens this will eventually happen if you double the bets and then wait for another winner especially if zeros get into the mix...........it's another get an early profit if you can and leave system.

[@Railz777]

The Holy MartinGrail

[@RoyalCaribbeanCruiseChronicles]

I’ve seen 10+ in a row of 3rd dozen. That could wipe you out. Especially if you’re at the higher level../ even if you win one out of 2 or 3 spins you get wiped out

[@jerseydigmore7994]

Unfortunately, there are days when you don't start off good with these systems. Finding yourself in the hole from the beginning. Then you kiss your bankroll goodbye 👋

[@leetoelle1716]

I really think this system will do well if it is played on the second and third columns.

[@AverageStudent1-l8m]

same thing will happen, surely there will be time when first column is on streak

[@stormteam3004]

​@@AverageStudent1-l8mtrue but do you even know why he suggested the second and third column or is it just easy to say, NO, WONT WORK?? Good day!

[@JamesKing-mr8fd]

This is just Sonny's 1 mil to 50 mil strategy using dozens instead of the last 2 columns.

[@matthewgraves9233]

It is true that 1st and 3rd is better than the original 1st and 2nd because of where the numbers are on an american wheel!

[@gabrielchong1322]

Reset at 75/150/225/300 instead of 150/300/450/600 and you will increase your chance of winning tremendously.......HELL YEAH

[@etacarinae5558]

ILL never stop saying this...only a fool would keep doubling their bets to get back their loses .

[@oxdevil]

Hahaha, we cannot beat those die-hard faithfuls of these Martingalers.... CASINOS simply love their contributions to the net revenue... Martingale chase loss is the SUREST WAY to lose it all back to the CASINOS...

[@James_Ford4815]

@@oxdevil the fact that online casinos give the (x2) button is a sign they want players to do it ... flat betting or ladders is the only way to go

[@user-tp6kb9sm5h]

@@James_Ford4815 Bingo!

[@HENSLEYDMB]

The problem is you will lose more hands than you win. Ladders are OK systems but actually keep you in the casino longer, which is bad for you. The best way is to select a set of numbers, wait 4 or 5 no bet spins, waiting for your numbers not to hit. Then bet big for four hands until hit. If no hit repeat. I do this with all numbers with a 2 and I pick 5 random numbers with a 1 in them. Your bet wins what you bet. You could do the same with second color. Wait for a red or black to end streak and bet on repeat of the color 1 time. Betting to win at least 100 per spin. The secret is to not bet every spin, pick your battles.

[@RoyKing-u3w]

All this idiots systems are losers. He makes big money from KZbin because of all these gullible followers

[@crystalwilson9477]

I dont understand why you raise the bet after a loss IF you are in profit zone. In the 2nd system, when he was up $500 and lost a spin, why not just bet again at base level?

[@davidreed9300]

Yep…or even better, let the clock keep the time, player keeps the money.

[@crystalwilson9477]

@@davidreed9300 That too. i also think having a $2000 bankroll.and using $5 units with a win goal of only $100-$200 would be more beneficial. Its not as exciting as $500 or more but it seems logical that you could win that amount every time u play then leave. Even $100 a day equates to $3k a month tax free.

[@oxdevil]

HOLY COW... the HOLY GRAIL WINNING STRATEGY that thousands of YT players can use to win $$$$$$$$$ and bankrupt all those poor evil CASINOS !!! EINSTEIN once said, the only way to win at Roulette is to steal the money when the croupier is not looking... NOW HOLY MOLLY, we can add another method to win even if the croupier is looking HAHAHA...

[@benvanzanten379]

that's why this channel is completely useless, messing around with 2 dozens doesn't help anything to lower the house edge, I think what he's doing is complete nonsense. Einstein was right.

[@mvlivinthedream9601]

Holy Grail works well for me.

[@TomCjr]

I think an improvement to this system would be betting the 2 most RECENT dozens - this will allow you to catch any consecutive hits in one dozen as well as avoid multiple misses in a dozen - your only vulnerability is repeated hits in the dozen you didn't bet, which, with the odds being 2 to 1 in your favor on each spin, VERY seldom happens more than 5-6 times in a row

[@chris.eskimo]

Makes sense to me ! I'll have to try a few live dealer sessions, each way. And see what works best.

[@seancasm00]

IMHO dozens seem to happen more often in groups of 5+ so I’ve been following the winner most of the time now. My exceptions happen with 10+ sleeping dozens and then I’ll Fibonacci

[@AverageStudent1-l8m]

betting on whichever column or dozen, Follow the winner or whatsoever don't really matter as there will be time when the luck go against you and when consecutive losses come in, unless you have big bankroll or else eventually your bankroll will be burnt by martingale

[@johnwaugh4680]

I am not a big punter and always have a win target of $100 or $200 depending on my bet size. I find things go sour if I keep going after that. 😝

[@Dave_Verbeek]

This is the 3rd time you show us the progression of the 2nd system and the second time it bust. I have also tryed it in the past and busted just as hard. I hope nobody ever try this progression because its to dangerous. I like doubling after a loss and after a win go back to the previous bet untill you are back down at basebet, way saver but you need to be more patience because sometimes you go up and down for a while without progress.

[@JamesMichael333]

The Ultimate Holy Grail - The logic of the 1st and 3rd is important because of where the numbers are on the wheel as opposed to 1 and 2, or 2 and 3 is the most ridiculous thing ive ever heard.

[@MrRetro607080]

Works short term but if you do not get enough wins in a row you can loose. i lost online some time ago with that. The original holy grail is more safe but if you have a bad run with high bets it is harder to recover. I suggest going up 1,2 4,7.11.16,etc on each lost and reset with any profit. Will test that for fun first.

[@marcgannon3627]

In my test spins on a practice wheel at home I had 8 in a row of the 2nd dozen. That would bankrupt the Ultimate Holy Grail.

[@alexkyle4973]

Hey marc..could you send me yr email

[@TheRouletteMaster]

For sure great feedback

[@erikengel153]

Mitchellgale anyone? Just saying the submitters system seemed very familiar

[@chapmannix]

This is a comparison between a variation of D’Alambert and traditional Martingale. Martingale will always be riskier with more variation. The D’Alambert version actually has merit but wouldn’t touch Martingale unless playing with BIG bankroll!

[@davidmcclung-ft7cu]

No need to hyper press your bets. Just bet the latest high ot low twelve with the middle twelve. Start with $2 and increase $1 on losses and return to $2 on win.

[@MusieTeklay-s8f]

do you know how much you are talent

[@keithraney2002]

any recommendations for an online casino for roulette?

[@geekassets6479]

Love using columns and dozens but not with infinite marty. Nope

[@skipper7329]

The Holy Grail is looking good. I may try that one again. That 2nd system seemed to sputter near the beginning... kind of gave that its about to take your bankroll vibe. 😂 From a strategy perspective my comment is why play the American wheel if you can play the European? Zero and double zero were both causing trouble. At least you get that 2.6% back. Great reviews RLM!

[@JamesMichael333]

Because some of us play in actual casinos and not online

[@alanprice2002]

Martingale is so aggressive, you could have started with bad run. I go up two on loss one down on win till prifit, reset.

[@Brian-bq9hk]

Please explain why they're saying 1st third and 3rd third better because of where the numbers are on the wheel? One person believes 1st & 2nd thirds while the other person believes 1st & 3rd sections are better. Why are any thirds of board better than another? Please explain & clarify why you mention this...I tested 1st strategy here online today and lost entire bank roll in well under 10 minutes!!! Please test this same system using 2nd & 3rd thirds of board and name it after me: Brian's Bombs Away roulette system..

[@James_Ford4815]

second one is def not even close to a holy grail and just like in the video it will bust regularly ... i truly do wonder if the people who send strategies in test them for more than 1 session lol

[@otracosa7587]

Staying on the first two twelves when the third dozen is hitting over 40% of your spins is at least questionable. Not always but most of the times it may be better to let the wheel dictate which dozens are possibly a better choice. Played on demo mode 2 days ago (dozens 1 and 2) and lost my bankroll in less than 15 minutes.

[@johnwaugh4680]

I prefer the system where you start on first and second twelve and if you win, say on the first twelve the next bet is on second and third twelve and so on leaving the last winning twelve out. Double once on loss and bet that amount til back approx. where you were, not necessarily to system profit. I also always place a small bet on zero with any system using European wheel.

[@otracosa7587]

@@johnwaugh4680 I really suspect that it's a gambler's fallacy for me to believe that moving the bets around the dozens gives a better chance of not getting many consecutive losses. What probably happens is that when a dozen hits 6 consecutive times we notice it easily but is it really not just as likely for us to get 6 consecutive losses when we move the bets around?. The thing that fools us is that the pattern that gave us the losses is not distinguishable like 6 consecutive losses on any dozen. I do like your idea of getting to your original bankroll when you are down instead of trying for a session goal. I actually did that yesterday and I believe it diminished my losses at the casino. I tried 3 systems with a bank roll= 200 x my basic unit of bet for each system. They all failed to a greater or lesser degree. I have decided starting today to not waste much more time with this. There is no way to be profitable playing roulette for the long haul.

[@gabrielchong1322]

The second system : Walk when you are up by 300-500....... Period

[@lordmhenh.o833]

Go

[@davidreed9300]

IMO any system that doubles on losses (martingale) should always use the double win before reset. I use it on almost all systems that don’t fully recover with just one win. My rocket blast system that RM butchered the review on, is supposed to use this, two wins before reset. That said, I would play the columns instead of dozens.

[@jonasmeier417]

The Martingaling is not a good system. The danger is busting. Can't say this is the Ultimate Holy Grail, because you bust very easily.

[@fredwebster1091]

i was at the Four Winds Casino in South Bend Indiana Saturday Night......all the Roulette Tables had a minimum bet of $15.00 and a Maximum of $100.00 .....I like watching your videos but with that tight of a spread do you have a good system to play that?

[@rogerrosen2323]

you can play sit down automated rouleete or online lower bets minimums

[@fredwebster1091]

@@rogerrosen2323 don't think I can do that as an Indiana resident

[@hubertmiles1673]

Start at $15 each and increase by $5 on losses. Plenty of spread there.

[@edwardbignardelli3603]

It’s a great system when you was at 500 you didn’t have to press

[@bartholomeusjordaan6203]

WHERE DID YOU GO THIS WEEKEND NOW WITH THAT COUCH OF YOU THAT YOU ALWAYS SAY SORRY FOR! I DONT WANT TO GO THERE !hehe

[@marnelcastro6467]

I try all this strategy in the Long run my money lost

[@eneeland]

The roulette master's strategy lost my bankroll so quickly. Scam.

[@lordmhenh.o833]

I lose

[@richardmartinez8034]

That’s definitely the degen version

[@JamesMichael333]

Right after watching this i tried the Holy Grail and lost my 2k bank roll. I had won and made my $1200 session win so next session win was $1350. I reset to $10 but then got as high as $320 on each dozen and couldn’t reach the $1350 And definitely dont care for the 2nd system at all. You can lose it all A LOT quicker

[@DHartwell1991]

I’m convinced none of these “strategies” work. Lost a $100 bankroll on $.10 units earlier and just lost a $70 bankroll using $.10 units using the Holy Grail

[@benz500r]

We were up and then we lost it all.

[@andreasapelqvist9247]

I wouldnt play this version :)

[@eneeland]

Even a monkey learns after 4 times. You MUST compare both systems to the same spins. Otherwise it is MEANINGLESS. Don't you get it? Am I coming in loud and clear. This is so frustrating how you keep ignoring this very clear message!!

[@oldschool1189]

Basically the second system is a martingale strategy. You WILL crash your bank roll. Simply said the second system has been around as long as the game has been. Come on man. Play like a pro and the holy grail is all you need at the casino. Yet to see anything more consistent at winning. Fact!

[@everyday316]

Original Holy Grail doesnt work for me at all

[@mattm1107]

I've had success with holy grail. I lost my bankroll due to martingale, so been building it back. I analyze the table statistics from 50-500 spins and that gives me a good chance at guessing what might be hot or not. I will pick either columns or dozens based on my analysis. Also zeros are a consideration. You need your bankroll to be 200x the unit you bet. Also, you need a low profit point. The person who submitted the system recommended 15%, well I'll tell ya, the longer you increase your bets, the faster you'll lose. If I'm using $1 units, i need a $200 bankroll. Instead of 15% profit, I'm happy with 5% profit, so $10. I'm actually gonna try lower profit targets to reset more. Maybe $2-3 Another thing I do is start my first bet with 2 units. If you start with $2 and get 5 wins right away, you already hit your first profit point. Or maybe less spins if you accept a lower profit point, which is safer. If I'm using $1 units and my bet gets above $6 I go into damage control mode. When it goes to $12+ I'm really looking for my exit point. If it gets to 20+ you are looking at a bust. I wait for a nice upswing then get out with making a little, losing a little, or breaking even. If the table trends towards the dozen I'm not betting on, I'm happy to switch. I try to keep my 2 bets on the 2 dozens or columns I think are likely to hit, checking the stats after every spin. Count losing spins in the last 14, last 25, etc. Good analysis of the stats can definitely tell a story of how the table has been trending. For example, if you are wanting to martingale, you're gonna look at the last 500 spins and look for streaks. If you see lots of streaks, don't martingale. If the colors and numbers are all over the place, it might be worth a try.

[@simonpasternak9810]

Down grade to the holy grail, the only way you can beat the roulette by 2x your bet is to find a different bet, streaks will kill this system every time

[@RandallOsborn-j3n]

Agreed 👍 Need to mix in a few different systems to change things up. I play using $5 units. Hit a profit of $25 then change to a different system. Done this for several years and has worked very well. I mostly ETG machines, with others playing. Trying to avoid AI algorithms from catching up with my systems.

[@Jimjamm73]

Who is to say you’re gonna get up 200 and then you can get out these bad spins could happen right away. The first several spins could have you bankrupt.

[@sammatsusaka823]

Why not start big,($50) then fall back to $10

[@e1369e]

Martingale systems lose too quickly, I'd prefer the original holy grail.

[@dwillis24]

The so called "ultimate" is just Martingale.

[@gibsonplayer8]

So glad you show that all systems have the potential to crash and burn! Also, it's ridiculous to say that it's better to bet the 1st and 3rd dozen because of where the numbers are. Completely preposterous...and the end result supports my view!

[@tehsndr3837]

Too risky doubling all the time, because for roulette master is easy to play not with real money, when you play for real is all’ a different thing , not easy

[@bartholomeusjordaan6203]

BOTH SUCK

[@robert-2819]

Hmmm. RM I have been rying to email you with a syst change to the good Adavtage Play syst and it is bounced back as a bad address.

[@ytwatcher01]

I can't even get his email address lol. It's hidden behind a chapta and doesn't appear after I prove I'm not a robot.

[@ManMountainManX]

TY. 090124