The singer actually doesn't sound too bad, some people in the comments are getting on as if he is awful, I am going up to Derry to see them in November, should be good
@antoniomoura1752 Жыл бұрын
Sensacional
@skatrain0072 жыл бұрын
Is this still the original line up?
@CelicaNCZ2 жыл бұрын
Apart from Feargal Sharkey
@skatrain0072 жыл бұрын
@@CelicaNCZ OK. Thank you.
@sqwekee86572 жыл бұрын
@@CelicaNCZ who ? 🤣
@skatrain007 Жыл бұрын
@@sqwekee8657 feargul does not sing
@craigrobertsonmsc.6260 Жыл бұрын
WTF is that meant to be..........................
@shack7631 Жыл бұрын
No Feargal, no Undertones.
@andynicholas1728 Жыл бұрын
I politely beg to differ. The songs were written by John O'Neill, Damien O'Neill or Mickey Bradley or any combination of those 3. The songs sound right with Paul singing them and it's the songs that count at the end of the day! I think Paul has great stage presence and charisma too. If Feargal had written any of those songs you'd have a point but he didn't contribute to the writing of any of the main Undertones songs. I'd agree that his voice was distinctive and a selling point at the time but Paul sounds similar and is a great replacement.
@shack7631 Жыл бұрын
@@andynicholas1728 The current guy sounds nothing like Feargal Sharkey. It was his voice which that band stand head and shoulders amongst the other bands at the time. Yes, the music was good, but albums like Hypnotised wouldn't have the same appeal without Mr Sharkey.
@phillarsson8253 Жыл бұрын
@@shack7631 Still I prefer the Undertones with Paul than no Undertones at all... and 'Thrill me' is a great song that's fully in line of their early work. Paul's voice is perfect for that song.
@skatrain007 Жыл бұрын
Was Feargal really that important for the sound of the Undertones?
@shack7631 Жыл бұрын
@@skatrain007Yes he was in the same way Pete Shelley's voice was to Buzzcocks or indeed Mr Lydon's sound was to the Sex Pistols.