Michigan Relics: The Largest Hoax In Archaeological History? | Michigan Relics

[@JunoDiovonaDemihof]

fakes... 100% fakes.... LMAO Nice video. thank you for posting.

[@robertg.arbuckle6838]

Do you think we are that stupid?

[@bobbybill4042]

Rosetta stone, Prehistoric. if you know what these words mean, you can understand that the people in this "doc" have no idea what they are talking about.

[@dewardroy6531]

I've seen this video before on KZbin. If not this exact one, then one with almost exactly the same content. All this nonsense has been debunked many times. Many times. It's not worth watching.

[@AngieSlocum]

Do you know of, or aware that, in Isabella county, MI, there is a "buried" rock wall that is mostly underground, but you can see the tops of it, if you are driving slow and lets say, looking for mushrooms or something.

[@sandy-quimsrus]

I liked watching it because of those god awful documentaries are still being made! Science is pretty clear.

[@ScionStorm1]

History Channel be like- It was the ancient aliens. Big foot helped them.

[@sandy-quimsrus]

@@ScionStorm1 not to mention the 10 seasons of Oak Island!

[@Andy_Babb]

@@ScionStorm1yeah but what about the reptilians who helped the ancient aliens build the pyramids. One of those clowns once said “we’ve found very few tools near the pyramids. Is this bc they are using antigravity devices and ET technology?!” Like, no assh0le, maybe they just VALUED THEIR WORK TOOLS!

[@Andy_Babb]

They’re Mormon, historical accuracy isn’t really their forte 😂

[@johnnysparks3417]

I wouldn't exactly say the science is clear on anything when zealous people fake artifacts. For example evolutionists faking the skulls of piltdown man to find a missing link. Skeptical is the best reaction. Liars are a problem.

[@RamblinJer]

I've studied artifacts for 40 years, specifically Native American. I have serious concerns regarding the authenticity of most of these "artifacts". The quality is lacking, the patina doesn't reflect the claimed age and stone that's remained in the ground for hundreds or thousands of years will have sporadic stains. However, this is not the case for all of the items. Some are authentic pre-Columbian/Contact artifacts, but these are of Native American origin. The publisher purchasing an oil lamp doesn't mean a thing. Collectors have been bringing artifacts from every civilization into this country ever since its founding.

[@battle_promaster3631]

Funny thing is. It’s in numerous states but like that publisher says present the evidence. Compare artifacts. Indiana has a stone a few tons so the Smithsonian couldn’t get their hands on it but the stone has multiple languages even the son god of Egypt. If it’s all fake then why hide it. And to believe Columbus was here first, not.

[@jholt03]

Gee, isn't there a thing called carbon dating that was developed especially for this kind of thing? I wonder why these "believers" have never had those tests run?

[@pichan8841]

Carbon dating refers to the detection of the radioactive, instable carbon isotope C14. A certain amount of which is ingested by most living organisms aslong as they're alive alongside 'normal' carbon (that's in CO2, Carbon Dioxide, e.g.) When the organism dies, the instable C14 can't be 'replenished' through ingestion. A certain amount of it per time is blasted away as radiation. The length of time the amount a radioactive element like C14 is reduced by half is called 'halflife'. While 'normal' carbon's portion remains stable and undeminished inside the dead organism. Thus by measuring the amount of C14 particles remaining in materials from formerly living beings, scientists, by using the element's halflife as a ruler, can tell how long that organism had no carbon intake. I. e. how long the being the organic material was taken from (e. g. a tree) has been dead. Due to the limited amount of C14 every organism is able to ingest and the timespan given by the chemical element's halflife value, carbon dating works up to a time of about 50 to 60 thousand years ago. That's why it would work just fine with charcoal from pre-columbian Hebrews' fires or their bones. But not with slate, copper or clay. And also, it won't work with dinosaur fossils, that are from more than 65 million years ago. Carbon dating is not the only dating method for materials and it's not 100 percent reliable, neither. The main assumption is that C14 levels in the environments around the world and through the different ages have been as high as we suppose they were. We can't be sure, we try cross-checking with other dating methods, etc. Still some belief involved....🕉✡☯✝☦☪🕎🛐😇😂

[@ScionStorm1]

18:00 "Even though they're outside the paradigm, we just have to say 'Oh my gosh' you know, 'here it is'. 😂

[@Andy_Babb]

How to tell me your incredulous without saying it 😂 Mormons aren’t exactly well known for their historical accuracy… and their objectivity isn’t what I’d call “stout” lol

[@bluepov]

Any more of this 'fake news' and you'll lose this subscriber.

[@rogerhinman5427]

That oil lamp...why not get it carbon dated? Was it made in 29 BCE or 1929 CE? "...I'm not an archaeologist" Yeah, that's plenty obvious.

[@bluepov]

Clay can't be carbon dated. They could probably ascertain the origin of the copper though, by looking at what traces of other metals are present and the ratios thereof.

[@jholt03]

@@bluepov Rocks can't be carbon dated but most clay has some organic content so it can. There are several other methods for dating these things now. If the people who own these "artifacts" didn't already know they were fakes they would have them dated.

[@edwarding4355]

Amateurish etching in stones and inconsistent symbols.

[@gbeatsmacedonia]

these are symbols not language ! they r up in d sky !!!!! they saw this y dmv bananas

[@robertg.arbuckle6838]

Such fakes insult us! Why do you put fakes on? Hoax? Made up dung.

[@edwarding4355]

Why do people put up these videos.

[@tabaldak5184]

Lmao people actually believed these to be real! 😂😂😂 well I do know some democrats! 😂