UNLIMITED GRAPHENE - MIT Graphene Roll to Roll CVD Explained

UNLIMITED GRAPHENE - MIT Graphene Roll to Roll CVD Explained
It looks like the days of making only small quantities of Graphene are coming to an end and soon we will be able to make the batteries that they promised a long time ago.
In this video we take a look at how the method works.

[@foxvulpes8245]

"Graphene can do everything....except leave the lab."

[@AlexFlockhart]

You could have said the same about metallic aluminum or artificial diamonds at one time or another

[@TheZenytram]

you could say that to silicon in the 50s

[@ricardoabh3242]

Fox Vulpes so true!

[@michaelgrow9550]

​@@AlexFlockhart, your reply may sound better in 20 years, when the process will be COMPLETELY different than this video, narrated via "I'm only a messenger."

[@michaelgrow9550]

@@TheZenytram, your reply may sound better in 70 years, when the process will be COMPLETELY different than this video, narrated via "I'm only a messenger."

[@bosatsu76]

A battery the size of a iphone carrying more energy than an entire Tesla pack... I always wondered how those star trek phasers could carry the energy they needed..

[@DanielFenandes]

Finally we know how they do

[@arillistionis4799]

It'll never existist, anything with such a high energy density would go boom, if disrupted in any way.

[@andrewgordon235]

All laser weapons use the same power source in science fiction. They use a micro fusion reactor that's why they never run out of electricity. Even Tony Stark's arc reactor is a fusion reactor minitarirized.

[@causeitso]

No iphone sized battery Will ever hold the same charge as a Tesla car battery. For this, the battery has to go nuclear. There is a clear distinction between energy from transforming the atom nucleus, which is nuclear energy which is accessing the 'weak force', one of the four fundamental forces. And between energy from tapping into the electromagnetic force, again one of the four fundamental forces, which only manipulates electrons around the nucleus but doesn't affect the nucleus itself. Hydrogen is the best user of electromagnetic force for storage and conversion of energy, particularly chemical energy to heat. Even a liquid hydrogen battery the size of an iPhone can't be enough for a car's full miles range and nothing can beat a liquid hydrogen battery.

[@DontTrustShadows]

@@arillistionis4799 Thank you Captain Obvious next rank Admiral Sure Fucking Thing. Technology is advancing so eventually we will find a way to stabilize it. "Never" is a strong word.

[@Konard]

Yes, Blender needs more ads.

[@albertcastellon574]

In my head I was listening to this video with the voice of Cave Johnson from Aperture Science. Does anyone have some cake?

[@masterplay1201]

Yeah, I love the aperture science references on his videos!

[@marcboutilier7044]

funny fact is... I found the cake from Aperture science in a restaurant I go to.

[@Panyc333]

I’ve been following the graphene developments for nearly a decade now. My only question is how do I invest in graphene.

[@fasctic3922]

Invest in a company with a product demonstrating the use of graphene. Some company just made a power bank as a proof of concept and to prove it's viable to actually manufacture it. The youtube channel "Cold Fusion" just did a video on it.

[@mrspeigle1]

Honestly I would hold back because most of the companies which are big enough to be publicly traded aren't going to be worth your time in the long run. The smaller emerging forms are all going to be known publicly traded or only available to qualified investors< meaning you earn $200,000 per year or $300,000 per year for a couple for at least two years and can demonstrate the likelihood of earning the same in the future.>

[@clavo3352]

TLGRF

[@MitchGoldhvu]

i just invested in Gratomic - a materials development company investing in graphite resources. it is a dollar stock and seems low risk for a longer term investment

[@sree1010]

Hope graphene will help improve dialysis machines and reduce sufferings of kidney patients

[@sugarbooty]

Is there any research done on this? I'd imagine the holes are too small

[@alhemmings8554]

Wonderful potential for water purification/desalination, chemical production as well. Could be a game changer in developing countries.

[@sugarbooty]

@@alhemmings8554 Water filtration, yes. Dialysis would need bigger holes

[@nicestguyinhouse6112]

SugarBooty but you could make graphene go in certain “moulds” and leave gaps and still be able for dialysis. Who knows what is possible but I’m sure this will be at some point, in fact I read something I think they found how to do this basics by heating certain parts more than others and where it wasn’t heated it left gaps. Obviously it can make it weaker etc and can tear in weak points but considering it’s still mostly in development as a material in every area this probably will be able to be done

[@threestans9096]

Why do you think graphene could help them? Why are they suffering? What suffering could it alleviate? Blood can only be pumped so fast….you can only filter as fast as your heart can pump. There’s a limit here. Wanna know what would help more?? More kidneys. Not another filter material. That’s not a problem….at all. Not even in the slightest.

[@Somber7]

I've been watching graphene since 2010 and it looks like graphene is getting ready to break out, great video!

[@SubjectZeroScience]

The graphene revolution will probably be like plastic, slow. If you search around, there are already companies offering graphene products. They are not what we expect but I think we are getting there. Thanks for the comment.

[@yannickm5429]

Should we invest?

[@michaelgrow9550]

Please keep watching graphene. It may get out of the lab after another 30 years.

[@ninjaslash52_98]

When

[@TonyGrant.]

@@michaelgrow9550 Graphene nanoparticles are being used in viable batteries now. I don't know how long it will take to get graphene sheets out there but Graphene nanoparticle technologies are imminent.

[@ashscott6068]

4:34 There's a loose atom

[@tylerwhite3065]

Why doesn’t this guys have more subscribers

[@OlivierSuire]

Because of the annoying tonal inflections

[@cro-magnongramps1738]

because the majority of people on the net are from Amerikka... and have tender ears....

[@adrianbowie2094]

Because if you can't use it nobody cares.

[@rickdees251]

Haha , I thought only I found his talking style a bit annoying. Enough to not subbscribe in my case.

[@oddarneroll]

I hope because his claims is total bullshit. Saying that Graphene batteries the size of a iphone maby can replace a Tesla battery. WFT? That's beyond stupid.

[@prathameshmore4739]

Boy, I can see a Promising KZbinr, Glad to be first 500 of the BIG Family in the Future.

[@mattphorwich]

Chemical vapor deposition...the right heat and preasure on methane and hydrogen,which collects on a copper substrate and forms a 40 ft sheet of graphene at mit. Looking forward to seeing how much they make when they upgrade their equipment and who will use it first....thanks for the knowledge,God bless the omniverse multi verses universes...everyone doing great things!

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Thank you for the comment. Im actually very excite for the next few years for the exact same reasons as you. Cheers.

[@DmitriyLaktyushkin]

Any references for the promises at 5:17? I'm not an expert in energy storage, but I am familiar with existing energy storage designs and have never heard of anything remotely on the scale of iPhone powering a Tesla energy densities. I know supercaps are getting made with graphene, but that barely brings them in line with existing liion batteries. Sounds like bullshit so far.

[@ExtantFrodo2]

With that kind of energy density in that lightweight package you could be powering flying cars, not just Teslas.

[@TonyGrant.]

@@ExtantFrodo2 Graphene supercaps will have more energy than Li-Ion but I'm pretty sure that density claimed here won't be possible. I think he needs to vet his sources.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

MIT Graphene Roll-To-Roll CVD Explained. Sounds complex but its quite simple really. Leave a like, it helps a lot.

[@Ziip47]

Graphene will change the world. Also they are working on Solid state Batteries which will also be a huge advancement. You should make a video on that if you haven't already.

[@raviverma8479]

Just awesome explanation .... I've been keen to learn about Graphene production .... And this video did it all

[@TonyGrant.]

Take a look at Robert Murray-Smith's channel for how tos on making Graphene at home.

[@markkaidy8741]

If you make the wire using the MIT process really small like fibers the are flatted you cann weave a graphene surface and then weave at 1.1 degrees for superconductivity as you mention in your other video...weaved graphene as carbon fiber is weaved for various thermal, conductive, and structural properties ...the substrate copper can be substituted for other metals for varying properties

[@alexandernienhaus2237]

As a material scientist, I have to say the following: - Nanotubes are indeed promising for many applications - Graphene is a potential candidate for efficient fuel cells, so there is much research for graphene in electromobility BUT - Graphene (consisting of pure carbon) is one of the worst materials for applications where heat resistance is required! So the part from 5:52 to 6:12 is absolute bullshit... Nevertheless a good video!

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Hey, thanks for the comment. so would you say that First graphene Firestop is BS? firstgraphene.net/applications/fire-retardancy/ i would like to know your opinion.

[@ozzyfromspace]

Liked and subbed bro, awesome visuals btw!

[@98f5]

this video exposes your lack of understanding but it's still awesome

[@dencole1]

Great video. I'm excited about Graphene uses, especially mobile devise batteries, like phones, smart watches, tablets, electric cars etc. Can you imagine a mobile phone going a whole week before charging it or putting a AA battery (made of Graphene) in to a torch that can stay on for a whole week. I think the battery manufacturers will have something to say about that.

[@cdreid9999]

er... imagine people in poor countries having fresh water and not dying of horrible disease. But hey you need your new toy

[@09asatin]

I was wondering why they don't dissolved the copper midway on the underside and roll it into a Brownian motion battery???

[@scowell]

Re-entry's big problem is dumping the heat... therefore, the shields are ablative... designed to shed hot pieces.

[@clavo3352]

Graphene deserves much more attention. There should be sheets available at every public library. Someone should publish a book about graphene with a few sheets of graphene as part of the book! This way the reader can experiment with it. Imagine a highway made of many layers of graphene. It could store solar energy and transmit it at will. A skyway strand of graphene cable could guide and power a gondola from China to California !

[@enbiomatriclab]

Go to any conference on materials. 80% of the papers/posters are on graphene. It's the only attraction everywhere.

[@clavo3352]

@@enbiomatriclab Hey Thanks; that's amazing I had no idea! I am not an engineer but I wish I was! I fear that so much has already been invested in the Lithium Tech and infrastructure that Graphene will be deliberately "sat on".

[@thedillestpickle]

@@enbiomatriclab That's interesting. Is the focus entirely on small devices or are people interested in it as a material for structures? I am particularly interested in how it can be used in composites as a filler material. I don't think we really need to perfect the properties or quality of graphene for those applications, we just need to develop mass production with some sort of process so that it is produced in the order of tons rather than mg. But this interest gets mixed in with the interest in using it as a conductor on electronic devices, which seems a totally unrelated application because in one, you produce bulk in a reactor vs the other you apply thin coats to a substrate and there is no bulk product to go to market with.

[@StopChangingUsernamesYouTube]

No matter how much I hear or read about graphene, and how much I groan internally about how it's looking less and less likely to take over in my lifetime, I'm still enamored by the potential it has to just break things whenever it does. Like, broad swaths of tech just obsolete overnight the moment we get large-scale, minimal-defect production of the stuff and the wherewithal to do what we want with it.

[@thedillestpickle]

Why? Conductivity is 1.4 times that of copper. Why you hating on copper? Copper is amazing. Does having 40% increase in conductivity really blow everything else out of the water? I mean copper pretty awesome already, so I don't see why we would expect such huge leaps forward by getting to graphene.

[@MegaKracka]

Interesting, though I wonder how bad people will freak out when a battery the size of and I-phone explodes. Accidents are bound to happen and that much energy stored in a small space will cause a lot of damage if released rapidly. I hope this tech comes to fruition like you stated, that will help in so many areas.

[@cdreid9999]

you likely have supercapacitors near you now which have enough energy to kill you instantly. your house encircles you with enough electricity to cook you alive.. but youre not dead

[@elfeiin]

Do you have any information on graphene batteries exploding?

[@Orientaliszt]

3:30 how the graphene domain size is controlled in R2R process?

[@fajile5109]

In CDDA i use a CVD machine to diamond coat my zwheihander. Makes it cut a little better.

[@abcqer555]

Fantastic video and the animations were A+++. You got yourself a new sub.

[@matthewstover6789]

What would happen if our you relayered the graphene but offset the layers and pulled them through another layers larger gaps? Sort of like quilting it together.

[@HaendyFreak]

Dude, you forgot the most interesting use of this technology : Space elevators

[@jadoo16815125390625]

Space elevators are supposed to be made by carbon nanotubes, not graphene.

[@slavkosky]

Wait...carbon nanotubes are tubes made of a 1-dimensional layer of carbon whose atoms are arranged in a repeating hexagon pattern. ...That's what graphene is

[@sh4dow666]

@@slavkosky It may be possible to create carbon nanotubes from graphene, but it is far from obvious whether that would be the most efficient way to produce them.

[@Verrisin]

There are better alternatives to space elevators, that only only require materials we already have. - Skyhooks, for example. - Ideally: Orbital ring(s) but... there will be still some time before those are economical. :D .... like 30 years or so XD -- really, though: orbital rings are awesome ^^

[@TonyGrant.]

@@slavkosky Carbon Nanotubes are not graphene.

[@slevinshafel9395]

4:02 why they use CH4(methane) than CO2(carbon dioxide)? Itis less dangerous , more cheap and i think can be more pure(the molecule its smaller) Another question the cooper band its charged with electric curent or samething? I ask it because that can help oriented and order the carbon(C) atoms.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

The reason is that it takes more energy to break the CO2 bonds but I heard that they are working on some technologies to actually use CO2. For your second question, its not charged, but i could be wrong. What they explain is that it is a property of the copper itself that facilitates the process when heated with temperatures of 700˚C+

[@keithedwards9953]

@@SubjectZeroScience I heard that the reason why they can't make a space elevator out of this process is because, even though it is high quality... the space elevator ribbon needs to be perfectly made. Is there not some way they could inspect and correct the imperfections to create suitable graphene for a space elevator?

[@alfredbudy1985]

Graphene Latex is my new obsession I want to learn all its application beyond extra sensitive condoms

[@stevew3167]

Bulletproof condoms

[@SCXBelka]

I had Russian subtitles, but I switched saw the second time and the subtitles disappeared. Why?

[@NoelCraigNI]

I'm not sure if I have the facts entirely clear but I was led to believe that to grow defect free graphene on a surface like copper then it first becomes a necessity to have a defect free copper surface. Is this correct or incorrect? It led me to think about how I could utilise 1~10nm copper nano particles plated in nickle to polish the copper surface with just enough abrasion to smooth out any defects but if the MIT guys have figured out how to do it using industrial quantities of copper film then that's pretty fantastic really.

[@NoelCraigNI]

Unless what they have is actually graphene sheet but which has defects but this doesn't detract from the accomplishment, it only means that with some additional quality assurance procedures they may very well have cracked the problem and that's fantastic.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

From their paper, its not clear if its defect free. However they do mention that the copper was refined in order to optimize the production quality. To be honest we will eventually get there in terms of purity because there is a LOT of interest for this material, which I will talk about in later videos, so stay tuned.

[@davidsirmons]

I'm wondering a step further.....if a graphene belt could be utilized by depositing directly onto it, reusing the belt over and over, and simply use micro "scrubbers" to either remove all excess copper atoms after deposition but before burning, or to find another way. I'm thinking a graphene sheet as a substrate instead of copper might be beneficial.

[@NoelCraigNI]

If I am understanding your thinking correctly, if you deposited carbon atoms onto existing graphene then I would have thought the end result of this would be 2 layer graphene but separating one layer from the other without causing defect's would likely be problematic.

[@foxxxof]

Where is this today I wonder. I read the titles, to infinity and beyond.

[@OldGamerNoob]

I wonder if there's any way to get the roll of copper in and out of the gas chamber without leaking, something like pushing it through a bath of mercury (even though that would degrade the copper) such that your graphene would not be limited in length to the length of the copper roll. That way you could perhaps roll all the graphene into a pure graphene ring that could be used as a link in a super strong chain or something Also I can see that if the copper doesn't need a seed, multiple domains of graphene would weed themselves at once and grow together. I would think there would be defects at the seams where the growing domains meet.

[@iamchillydogg]

Both ends are in the vacuum and it unrolls from one end and rolls up on the other.

[@OldGamerNoob]

@@iamchillydogg precisely, the length of the ribbon is still limited to the space incide the starting vacuum chamber. I just thought it would be cool to be able to create an indefinitely long ribbon

[@royromano9792]

Wow, all of the batteries of a Tesla. Fit into the size of an I-phone. That's crazy, really mind blowing.

[@psiah9889]

Would finally solve the problem of an energy source for, say, an iron-man style exosuit.

[@tylerdurden3722]

All the moonlanding's control centre's processing power fit into pocket calculator.

[@blueboytv9191]

I wonder if it's possible to capture energy from craft re-entry into planetary atmosphere. It might offer some additional energy for planet side activity.

[@JohnDlugosz]

How did you figure the energy density for a battery the size of an iPhone that would replace the batteries of a Tesla? I thought that the theoretical maximum for chemical storage was about the same as hydrocarbons, or perhaps a small multiple of that -- not orders of magnitude greater!

[@AntTurner]

definitely not possible lol

[@TroySavary]

Everything I have read about graphene batteries has a theoretical energy density about 10 times that of lithium ion. In other words, this guy is full of shit.

[@ExtantFrodo2]

Need to find a similar method to apply to Carbon nanotubes.

[@aprettymonotheism3026]

Looking for that as well

[@adrianbose9018]

what about using flash graphene instead of methane??

[@Technicalstockmarket12]

wonderful video series, keep making such videos

[@TheKamilkrawczak]

Your 'The wonders of the Miracle Material ' animation have one free floating carbon atom (green dot not attached to anything) that got my OCD to next gear! 😂

[@ersaiynrachmadiyev3381]

What inventions humanity put into real life is just tiny fraction.

[@crushedcreeperscomeback932]

This gives off portal 2 trailer vibes.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

That was the intent but people didn’t like it. Ow well

[@ricardoabh3242]

Excellent info and presentation, but be careful, lately we do kill the messenger ;) since 300! lol

[@Kuki_ogl]

Still dont understand why your channel its not viral. In my opinion its pure quality information in here.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

comments like this keep me going. lets hope it happens so i can have videos on weekly basis.

[@Kuki_ogl]

Subject Zero Science just please dont stop. I found your channel recently and I was really amazed. Thank you for your work.

[@HerbaMachina]

growth on KZbin is usually exponential, slow growth at the start, then very fast growth.

[@jcjensenllc]

Tell us when it leaves the lab.

[@nssherlock4547]

0.11 typo. It say's roll to rool in beginning graphic.

[@slevinshafel9395]

and another question. How they split the two elements? the graphene film from a cooper layer. what method can be used. its easy to do it and not make damge to the graphene or the roll cooper?

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Apparently that is not the problem at all. From what i got form the paper, they are having trouble with the fact that the Graphene sheet roll onto itself. so its not sticky. I have to look more into this.

[@_djmn_]

just compare graphene and cooper melting points.

[@ArbitraryOnslaught]

Korea has been doing this for a long time now. Good job "MIT"

[@spacetomato1020]

Stellareffervescence source?

[@joshuah2234]

*5:01** through **5:14* Would you cite this, this claim seems absolutely unbelievable, I have to read it for myself.

[@dragoonsunite]

When I heard this I thought it was total bullshit too... And it 'basically' is. I haven't found any articles actually giving solid information on the use of graphene for batteries or as supercapacitors, but many science journalist articles claiming its potential for this purpose. Graphene is well known in material science circles to be an outstanding superconductor, I think the flaw in reasoning comes from the misconstruing of superconductors with supercapacitors and semiconductors. Graphene is NOT a good capacitor material or a semiconductor material like silicon. However, "in theory" given the amount of current you can pass through a graphene layer with minimal to no loss or heat transfer, IF you could somehow change the material properties of graphene to store the energy instead of transfer it, then it would indeed have these properties... Of course the same is true for a lot of superconductors, so it's kind of a moot point, and I imagine at some point a scientist confirmed this pie in the sky idea which is the source of all these crazy articles, but naturally science journalists being unqualified to understand the qualification just ran with it. As far as I know we the best semiconducting material aside from silicon is titanium disulfide, which actually is something being researched for its potential use in computing. It's a VERY poor material for energy storage since in order to retain its properties it has to be kept under extremely high pressures. This is possible for something at a microchip level, but if you start making large batteries out of the material, or sizable capacitors, you begin creating a VERY high risk of a material that not only can go up in flames like modern lithium batteries, but also literally explodes with a much higher energy density. It's unlikely that weaponizable materials will make it into consumer products when all you have to do is puncture them to kill large numbers of people. It might make it into military applications though 'maybe.' In any case, I'm all for material scientists finding a way to store energy with graphene, but I will add that if it really could store the energy of a TESLA's battery pack in an area the size of a phone, even if it wasn't pressurized, the flammability and reactivity of such a battery being damaged would make lithium ion batteries look like sparks. It's a literal fire bomb at that point with more energy then any conventional extinguisher could ever put out. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that while lithium ions are 'dangerous' they aren't THAT dangerous, but this would be a real hazard even if it was possible, and might be questionable in consumer applications as well... Ultimately a lot of these miracle materials and science is really just filled with a lot more misunderstandings and assumptions then people are aware of. If such technologies ever do come around, they won't be easily adopted by consumer materials anyway is the point, and if they are they present a serious danger and hazard to those who use them.

[@joshuah2234]

@@dragoonsunite This was a great explanation to and summation of my skepticism. Thank you!

[@TonyGrant.]

@@dragoonsunite I didn't read all that but to address the comments in your first paragraph take a look at Robert Murray-Smith's channel. He makes graphene capacitors on screen. He claims about 1kW per kilo with his highest capacity chemistry. He's using graphene nanoparticles.

[@jaypearce6743]

Can you determine the orientation of the graphene Hexagons? I read in an article yesterday that the orientation pretty much determines the strength on tge graphene.

[@wedmunds]

That's not quite how it works. The orientation is important, but only in the way that neighboring “hexagons” (what we call grains) need to be in the same direction for the crystals to fuse. If they are not, then the boundary will be weaker.

[@heregulmithal7063]

Promising technology . Let's hope it does good on the Earth .

[@angyva8114]

Is Graphenoxide in bionthec and moderna and Jonson? Yes or No???

[@claxvii177th6]

The power density claims are bunkers bro. Also, graphene is not qualified for reentry heat insulation...

[@iamchillydogg]

Considering it barely exists that makes sense.

[@luisff7030]

I think the secrete could be the extreme thermal conductivity, about 10 to 20 times of the copper. Then they could dissipate the heat with water vapor, before it could be burn in the air. But the heat energy produced is so big that even this may be impossible.

[@RodrigoOM]

Really nice video!!! Do you use blender for the animations?

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Thanks. Yes I use blender, been using it for over 10 years.

[@صحيحصح2]

Where are you from, the owner of the channel?

[@cmscms123456]

Im an engineer, in 1990, (29 years ago) I worked for a company that made diamonds... diamond substrates. After about 1 1/2 years there, testing and developing, I came to work one day and was not allowed in. Men identifying themselves as FBI told me to go home and wait for instructions. I was told to return to work 2 days later to collect my things. The ENTIRE company was SEIZED, rolled up and taken away. That was 29 years ago... Has anyone seen a DIAMOND PROCESSOR in a computer or cell phone? NOPE, and you NEVER WILL. The Government has them though. Diamond can withstand heat hundreds of times better than silicone chips.. meaning MORE SPEED, FASTER COMPUTERS. Graphene is no different. The explanation you are hearing here is quite old tech. The Government has been manufacturing high grade Graphene for more than 10 years now. Fear not, remember everything is relative. During World War 2 'plastic' was NEW... a pound of plastic, as difficult as it was to manufacture at the time, was worth a pound go GOLD... Today, we make trash bags out of plastics. The impact of Graphene is going to be epic. Light and transparent solar panels, and batteries will put EVERY oil company OUT OF BUSINESS. Im aware of one instance of a company 3D printing a lithium type cell phone battery.... It had 10 times the capacity in the same area. That was only a first attempt. Now imagine an electric car, with a graphene battery taking up the same area, with 10 times the capacity, attached to transparent solar panels in every window of the car.. AND embedded in the surface of the body panels. A car that you would never have to charge, unlimited travel distance. ALWAYS ON charging. Same with your house, these BIG UGLE SOLAR panels are OBSOLETE. Graphene solar will actually look like your roofing material, it will also be transparent, and in every south facing window of your home. Graphene will change EVERYTHING.

[@franchocou]

Do you get retirement fund?, I heard someone story, quite similiar

[@TroySavary]

Fuck off with the bullshit. Tons of companies make artificial diamonds. The government does not have magic diamond computers and magic graphene cars.

[@01Fratricide]

CVD, Chemical Vapor Deposition

[@davidsirmons]

Good info, but you need to do a reading check before publishing. There are a number of word use errors and misspellings.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Ow, I am aware of it. The problem is that when you finally upload it, you are just sick and tired of re-watching the video over and over again. specially when you do this after work. LOL

[@dreamwhisperer2340]

You do know you're not a football commentator from the 50's right? You don't have to repeat the same tonal inflections over an over when you describe the subject.

[@OlivierSuire]

I was going to comment on this ; it's really exasperating !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@cro-magnongramps1738]

personally I loved it, brings back a lot of good memories... Hockey Night in Canada, and the CFL commentary... ahhhhh, those were the days... or daze :D feel like some days I'm staring in a Sci Movie or TV show (My Favorite Martian) from the 60's... Why does Mars have a desert the size of several thousand Sahara's.... where is my flying car?? LOL... yesterday I saw a kidney specialist, and he wasn't shocked or put a downer on my Longevity ideas, and he knew of Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis and their work... he just said, you are in good health and we'll see about keeping you that way.... you just have to do the work of maintaining a good diet and exercise... and we'll monitor the rest... Gov't Medicare (we call it OHIP here in Ontario) is a miracle... by American SS Calculator I've got 15.5 years left to reach 86... by Canadian Stats, we add 3-4 years because of our health care system.... so figure near as makes no difference, 20 years, or 2038/9 for the average... I'll be 91... if you don't know what's coming, how can you take advantage of it... :D

[@Tundra1428]

Whereas I'm sure there are things to critique, it would be unfair not to note that every one has their own style.

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Internet commenting etiquette for the win

[@SubjectZeroScience]

@Tundra14 Agreed

[@ExtantFrodo2]

Make ships? How about a space elevator?

[@maxk4324]

I was gonna say, ya it's kinda pointless to use space ships if you can make large scale graphene structures. Especially something as simple as a ribbon (albeit an insanely long one).

[@centar15]

5:10 Battery the size of an Iphone with Tesla capacity? Wow that's insane, any source for that info?

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Back in 2015 they theorized that a Graphene battery the size of an iPhone would be able to power a Tesla, but to be honest I think its a bit of an overstatement but not "too" far from the truth. Some experiments suggest, at least, a 5x the current capacity for lithium ion batteries per kg. That means that the Tesla model 3 would need a little over 1000 Graphene batteries. I know it's not the size of an iPhone but its very promising. Take a look at www.grabat.es, they are doing some really cool stuff. I do believe though that they will be able to get at least 20x the capacity in the next 5 years. I will make a video about this so stay tuned.

[@centar15]

Holy smokes - that would be awesome! :) I've been reading some different forums on this topics, some just enhancing the LiIon, some changing the story altogether, and am never sure what to use a best-case scenario. Thanks so much for a reply, you just got yourself a sub!

[@fededevi1985]

THat's bullshit, It is not possible. Even if you have a battery which somehow can manage to create 100% efficient electricity out of oxidation with 100% of the volume being used by the active element (and use the oxygen in the air as comburent) you will be very far from that energy density. CHemical batteries are limited by the energy in chemical bonds, so you will never go above the energy density of things like gasoline or hydrogen.

[@goldmenber100]

your channel is awesome , thanks , love it all

[@ZAR556]

Chinese Reverse Engineering Department take notes about this

[@osc3892]

Can anyone share a source for the theoretical capacity of a Graphene Battery? I was trying to find some but I haven't found one quoting such an extreme improvement of capacitance (The one mentioned in the video saying the size of an iPhone can theoretically replace all 13 KWh sitting in a tesla )

[@SubjectZeroScience]

I will make a video about this topic. Hold on!

[@osc3892]

you have gained a subscribed user!

[@godkid8059]

Graphene + Solid State Battery = ultimate power source.

[@joshako]

Imagine a plane made with graphene, graphene battery, graphene solar panels. That will run forever.

[@LukeA_55]

imagine graphene

[@dhanushsai396]

Can you make a video on space fountain

[@kairon156]

I'm glad people are sharing their methods because I fear the day Graphene production gets patented by 1 company.

[@kevinrtres]

too late - Universal materials company ...flash joule heating method....

[@asmithgames5926]

How do we invest in this?

[@thelitchfieldexperiment6269]

Can graphene be produced by laser sintering?

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Yes, just not feasible for mass production.

[@ultrabaron]

How do we make money investing into this?

[@WayneJohnsonZastil]

Earned a new sub love it.

[@jimparsons6803]

Sounds interesting. When d' y' think I could buy some on eBay? Just a thought.

[@TonyGrant.]

You can but graphene nanoparticles on ebay now. The quality varies though.

[@saqibmudabbar]

*Correction:* 5:11 Many _-times-_ *many* times

[@christophegroulx8187]

Planes & Planes 飞机 What’s wrong?

[@robertn2951]

I would like to know what has the author of these cool videos studied when he was in school...

[@dreamkinetics941]

Am I able to use this technique legally?

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Yes, and technically it's not that expensive.

[@andrep.5513]

I'm mad I had actually thought about a process so similar last month, but at least it's made ;)

[@tylerdurden3722]

Me too

[@christophegroulx8187]

This video was made a year and a half ago

[@kcvriess]

Just a suggestion; Coul you either use calmer music, or cut it all together? I found it quit distracting. Otherwise great video! Nice explanation.

[@bcarroll03]

Great video, not great music. Your new videos are much better

[@Kalumbatsch]

How does tis metod works?

[@eleones]

Great video. Very clear and concise. Your 3D animations were very helpful. Thanks! 👍🏼👍🏼😁

[@drumstick-marblebag]

Am I watching the turning point in the History? Am I watching the end of Oil and Gas Industry? If yes, then I am happy about it. Congrats world, for cleaner world!

[@nssherlock4547]

Till the batteries need recharging.

[@gerardomartinez3920]

haha no

[@babybabyseb]

Amazing!!! I subbed :))

[@johnsaltzohuigin6660]

Can you make a paint?

[@daltanionwaves]

2:30 End of intro, Summary of MIT invention starts

[@michaelfelder2640]

If it's raw methane then this MIT machine would be perfect at a cattle feed lot.

[@steveforbin911]

I think your video is great and think graphene is future in every one's life and the many products that will never rust... Cars should never rust and the steel mills might not sell much. Refrigerators and washing machines won't rust. Older cars can be fitted with new graphene parts and the age of automobiles will go up. Just replace the worn parts and interior and you got yourself a new car with low property taxes. The Tax man ain't goanna like it and the electric cars can travel farther with this light structure Graphene. Thanks for the great video and when do you think the new batteries will hit the market? Home power for you home and hunting lodge in the woods and hills. Cheaper heat and cooling. Crank up the wind mill and charge things up. The future looks bright and all you tax slaves might have an extra dollar in your pocket when you retire. But watch out those jobs out there might not make the Standard of Living. children. Teach your well.

[@aryapatel7615]

why the guy has only 10k subs??

[@piotrlis4695]

Because this is not a news in science and engineering community.

[@vostfrguys]

this is wrong in 2021 we learned that : - we can produce grephen at large scale - one iphone size graphen battery would cost a lot and would not store "a tesla" battery in terms of energy - you cannot store energy for a long time (with pure graphene unfortunalty) - silicon won't be replaced by graphen because it cannot "hold" information "long enough" - much more stuff

[@vostfrguys]

But there are hope since other materals exists and AI can find most optimised for x purpuse !

[@vostfrguys]

Futur will be mindblowing, and futur is "almost" now !

[@gridvid]

Great! I subbed :)

[@SubjectZeroScience]

Thanks man, I was feeling sad for only having myself as a sub! LOL

[@gridvid]

keep it up... subs are hard work these days :/

[@blacksmith9451]

Can't wait till we can roll regular thc also

[@Neznisgip]

Hurry up and figure out how to mass produce this material, I have a house design in mind.

[@cujoemblakka1041]

Welcome to the electro-space age !

[@azizmohammed182]

Great video. Just CVD = chemical vapor deposition* and not deposit.

[@skyhiker4819]

Excellent!

[@tricky778]

You're not just the messenger, if you were you'd have MIT's actual original wording.

[@Etheoma]

problem being if you had that kind of energy density, any damage to the structure would cause a huge explosion. Really the energy density of batteries are about as high as you would want them to be unless heavily heavily shielded. I suppose if it's the size of an iphone you could integrate it into wind turbines and they need to be so spread out that an explosion in one would not effect the next.