Unveiling Terrence Howard's Secret Mathematical Genius

‪@HistoriesMysteries95‬ Come along and help discover the the mathematical prowess and genius of Terrence Howard!

[@gametime2473]

1x1=2. I always thought it was 11. Oh wait, that's 1+1

[@Dobranican]

No, Dummy, 1+1 is ITI and ITI in Cosmic difference refraction over vertices is in fact 80085.

[@DawgHouseVideo]

Is this Terrence's other channel?

[@Joe-nx7nj]

My first memory is seeing Terrance Howard do math.

[@G.GordonMidi]

He kept telling himself “remember this, remember this!” before he had language or concept of memory at all. Totally believable guy 😂

[@TheinterfaceTvSeries]

This is trolling at its finest! 😂🤣 That being said He certainly is making math and science trendy.

[@josephmatthews7698]

Math and science is making Howard trendy. Unfortunately Howard cannot understand any of it

[@SloppyGoat]

Sabine Hossenfelder just posted a short video about this. She's a very famous and successful physicist. Terrence knows absolutely nothing about math or physics. If you believe anything he said, please go watch her video. It only took her about 10 minutes to totally demolish anything he claims. She's not going to waste much time on this gibberish. She's way too busy for that, doing real science.

[@alabamaflip2053]

That was a lot of words without saying anything. So what did he actually do? The only thing I could find is that he thought 1x1 should be equal to 2. This faulty logic did not fair well on his X account. Many year ago he was working on a degree that he did not finish in Chemical Engineering. You have to give some details to your account of a "Mathematical Genius" besides being a cheerleader without any thing to back up your praises.

[@HistoriesMysteries95]

His theory involves I believe 67 circles...no lines are straight. I have watched many videos on it and it is astonishing. Keep looking for the circles! :)

[@wrc1210]

@@HistoriesMysteries95 Again, more words without saying anything. What specifically is his theory involving 67 circles? What's astonishing about it? How can you heap all this praise on him when that's all you know about it? Also, name just one mathematician that has praised Terrence Howard. Just one. You can't because there are none. Nobody takes him seriously because he's a delusional idiot.

[@HistoriesMysteries95]

Yes it does

[@happierabroad]

Stop using linear logic. There is a deeper truth to what he is saying. Stop using limited atheist logic.

[@Have_an_aim]

@@HistoriesMysteries95 You need a real education. Howard Terrence hasn’t contributed shit apart from psychobabble.

[@SloppyGoat]

Professor Dave Explains is also another channel you should check out. He just made a video on this, too. So, we do have some real physicists and intelligent people chiming in on this. And none of them agree with Terrence, who is just totally ignorant of math and science.

[@happierabroad]

Your channel name is grammatically incorrect. It should be "History's Mysteries".

[@sum1191]

His story…his stories

[@dreammjpr]

This is an unfinished video. Where's the punchline? (I assume the title was purely sarcasm)

[@illinoisjones8003]

"It's Hard out Here for a Pimp"

[@DJF1947]

A great parody of the Dunning-Kruger poster-boy.

[@wrc1210]

This is absolutely hilarious. It just had to have been written by Terrence Howard, himself. Nice try, Terrence. You're a legend in your own mind.

[@jazzindo8888]

After his appearance on JRE, this comment didn’t age well.😅

[@wrc1210]

@jazzindo8888 You think his JRE appearance made him look good?

[@friendlysoviet1]

@@jazzindo8888 The JRE solidified that Terry is a manic schizo.

[@tdmidas289]

​@@wrc1210😂 stop it bro the sheep believe anything wrapped in big words.

[@elliotpolanco159]

@@jazzindo8888 exactly

[@user-ol4qz1cx3j]

I think he’s trying to one up Don Cheadle. Actual smart people don’t brag about how smart they are.

[@emi-ye7zi]

Enough already!

[@danedormio]

And yet somehow no actual mathematicians have ever encountered this ghostly "work" of Terrence Howard, but the legends say that if you listen carefully at midnight you can hear it howling at the moon.

[@portalsandmagicghostnumbercube]

Oh God! This sounds like me! Must do a reality check.🤪

[@justinshort2359]

This was either written by a great comedian or was written as an autobiography by a narcissistic maniac! 😂😂😂 🤡

[@moonbot-en-007]

bro the stock images .. no please no

[@HistoriesMysteries95]

I'm working on finding better pictures, but listen to his words

[@heef9001]

@@HistoriesMysteries95 hey why does my calculator say 1 x 1 = 1?

[@jasonloftis6318]

@@heef9001 Must be one of those Apple calculators that says 50+50*2=150 when Terrance Howard knows that it's 200.

[@jasonloftis6318]

@@HistoriesMysteries95 I was listening to the words until your elderly Brit narrator wet slurped in my headphones between sentences. Was Terrance Howard actually in the recording booth with him?

[@ramfanbland]

Im no mathematician but its easy to debunk his "discoveries".

[@enobishop1419]

Why is hate have to be projected ? - why care if you don't care? That's what is so illogical... ?

[@JapanSpr94]

Howard does not use science or mathematical equations to prove his hypotheses.

[@ifoundleon]

Please buy things from me. I have 1 candy bar, and it costs $1. So, I am going to charge you 1 x 1 = 2. You owe me $2. That cool with you?

[@BahaariTV]

This video has obviously attracted the wrong audience... I can't believe the comments here

[@Aap_Gadhe]

Dur dur I believe terence because he is celebrity durrrr

[@BahaariTV]

@@Aap_Gadhe No, stupid. Being a celebrity means he has a job like everyone else. He's just human

[@approved_direct_care1435]

For all you critical geniuses, take note! Multiply = Increase this means that to multiply is the same as to INCREASE, go check your dictionary.

[@williamfarrell1109]

Multiplication- a mathematical operation that indicates how many TIMES a number is ADDED to ITSELF. Does not Necessarily INCREASE the quantity. What for example is 1/2 of 2 or rather 2(1/2). Half of two is one. One is less than two. last I checked. P.S. I’m no genius by far but the whole 1^2=2 thing is just way out of my depth not to mention solipsistic as hell. P.s.s. I’m a little rusty on my math but I believe multiplication is formally proven by division?

[@williamfarrell1109]

Like how many times does one go into one? Two?..!

[@approved_direct_care1435]

Congratulations!! This is exactly the conundrum that warrants a pause & reexamination of the established rules. WHY is it that 1 times itself is the ONLY multiplier that fails to adhere to the inverse operation rule? Until I answer that question for myself then, I will keep an open mind to the possibility that Mr Howard’s assertion may have a valid and credible application. It’s like asserting a demand: it’s either this OR that! To which I respond why can’t it be this AND that? We live in a dualistic dimension so goes the tendency of thought. However, this is not the only dimension in existence. I’m slow to come to my own conclusions but understand the tendency to maintain & defend the status quo. Wake up & be bold enough to think for yourself as opposed to defending the status quo. Until you can answer the question regarding the inverse operation rule, the argument remains open & plausible.

[@approved_direct_care1435]

2(1/2) = 1 Meaning that the factor of 1/2 has increased. The factor that is being multiplied is 1/2 BY 2 therefore the increase is measured by the factor being multiplied. According to the “Dictionary of Mathematics Terms” 2nd Ed. 1995 by Douglas Downing Phd, professor at the School of Business & Economics, Seattle Pacific University page 214 states; “Multiplication is the operation of REPEATED ADDITION.” That’s the established rule I’m referring to when I state that 1x1=2 is at the very least a possibility.

[@maxff123]

@@approved_direct_care1435 what is 0.5 * 0.5 then?

[@JohnMcPhersonStrutt]

Who is the narrator? It sounds a bit like Sir David Attenborough,but somehow, i don't think it is ! !

[@friendlysoviet1]

"In conclusion" Did a 5th grader write this?

[@hydra70]

No, ChatGPT did. The prompt was probably "write me a 5 page essay on the mathematical genius of Terrence Howard." That's why it's structured like a school essay.

[@MultiRationalThinker]

No. Anyone who thinks Terrence Howard is a mathematical genius never made it to the 5th grade.

[@Vodka_c-zar]

What if he is actually right ....think about it....seems impossible but we actually don't know everything ...

[@Aap_Gadhe]

Mf are you KIDDING, we do know atleast a basic level to understand that he is wrong, ofc idiots like you have to question yourself instead of being able to use your own mind to come to a conclusion that terence is absolutely insane

[@eroccha]

We know that if you have 1 item in 1 group you have a total of 1 items. That is all multiplication is.

[@approved_direct_care1435]

To MULTIPLY = INCREASE NOT about counting groups

[@eroccha]

@@approved_direct_care1435 lol. From the Oxford Language Dictionary mul·ti·ply [ˈməltəˌplī] verb obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times:

[@eroccha]

@@approved_direct_care1435 lol. From the Oxford Language Dictionary mul·ti·ply [ˈməltəˌplī] verb obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times:

[@domainmojo2162]

Hmmm... I'm not sure if you're being serious or sarcy(really). What has he actually done/accomplished? I don't see any great published and praised works- except the 67-circles theory.. which is "interesting", but that's about it. I'm genuinely asking.

[@nefuros551]

over 90 patents on these concepts

[@MultiRationalThinker]

@@nefuros551 - any idiot (with a bit of money) can register a patent. The idea doesn't have to be correct and you don't have to make a working prototype if it's a patent on a design. It just has to be something that no one else has patented. Terrence is living proof that an idiot can have patents.

[@MultiRationalThinker]

What has he accomplished? Apart from demonstrating that he doesn't understand the most basic concepts in maths, he's also served up an amazing word salad of physics terms, none of which he understands.

[@mediacrusher]

He's just an old-fashioned crank, I bet he invented a car engine that runs on water but "THEY" stole it from him.

[@mommabahre6017]

Question everything or we will learn nothing new.

[@eieiuhooh1]

ok i am confused. is this a joke? i thought it was a joke but slowly seems like u guys are serious

[@JohnMcPhersonStrutt]

Eleiuhooh, I said and thought the exact same thing about flat Earth ! !

[@enobishop1419]

Think for yourself... do some research and decide for yourself... That's what's important... having an opinion isn't so important. I think it's important to have a viewpoint. To agree and disagree are basic and fundamental. Find your truth and go do you. Beliefs are not facts but can serve as inspiration to the expansion of knowledge. Enjoy your search for truths... keep an open mind so you can change and continue. "The answers are within" understand the difference between beliefs and facts. It's when one has all the answers... what's left to explore and discover? Observe yourself... what one thinks becomes one's reality Would you rather be right or happy In short something to think about Negative and Positive projection from you is yours... 🔥 ❤

[@help4343]

Lot of meaningless platitudes there

[@MikeBTek]

Dude does not see the implication of his errors or does he? If 1x1=2 then what is 2x1 equal to? What is 3x1 equal to? What is 10x1 equal to? His 1x1=2 throws off all our calculations. Structures would collapse, electronic devices would not work. Dude does not see the implications of his errors or does he? If he can get you to believe 1x1=2, than he knows he has caught one.

[@johnnyxmusic]

Very deeply hidden. There’s no doubt that he’s a very bright person… And very charismatic and all of that. But he just seems to have inhaled his own fumes and I would love to be proven wrong. Why not?

[@MultiRationalThinker]

Very bright??? He's thick as pigshit. He makes the average flat Earther look bright in comparison.

[@hydesmith6841]

What a joke

[@Preetvnd]

this has to be a joke, no?

[@dontajohnson7181]

Bro don't allow thoes who have no knowledge stut your growth. Do your thing. When it actually turns out to be true the world will try to jump on the band wagon. Do you bro and keep push.

[@eroccha]

lol. He thinks 1*1=2. We can do this visually with objects and prove it is 1. I know we can because I did in the 2nd grade.

[@coldsholda]

It’s all lies

[@enobishop1419]

Thank you Terrence Howard You know what you know when you know it Knowledge is not power The application of knowledge is power Action - Reaction Think for yourself What you think becomes your reality 🔥 ❤

[@Have_an_aim]

😂😂😂

[@MultiRationalThinker]

But he doesn't know anything. He spouts meaningless gibberish. It only sounds good to people who are as clueless as he is. The rest of us know he's talking crap.

[@WinstonNewYork]

Please, didn't he just confuse the operation of x with +? . . . As for the square root of 2, it's proximately 1.4 . . . Re 0, so we want to deny the great contribution to knowledge of the ancient Mayans, et al? . . . Yet more evidence -- tell me if l'm wrong -- that brothers should NOT do math.

[@saraesmoon]

I wonder if you are the actual piece of shit that the last part of your comment makes you seem. 🤔

[@midnightwatchman1]

he is rubbish, do not even understand concepts of categories and group theory properly

[@wrc1210]

Group theory? The dude doesn't even understand basic multiplication that every 2nd grader understands. He thinks 1x1=2, ffs.

[@midnightwatchman1]

@@wrc1210 just some one posing as smart

[@Rkenyi]

@@wrc1210 you prove that or argue him, he has all proves of what he is saying.

[@wrc1210]

@Rkenyi He doesn't have proof of jack s***. His Terryology "paper" is a muddled mess of nonsense. And I don't need to prove anything since multiplication has been around forever and commonly understood by people as young as 6. Only TH seems to be confused about why 1x1=1.

[@Rkenyi]

@@wrc1210 proved 1*1=1

[@omgxlc]

Yaw need to go watch his video he did at Oxford college when he broke it all the way down what he’s talking bout a showed proof because in our math he showed how we got loops … that makes math don’t make sense

[@approved_direct_care1435]

Finally an intelligent response! Thank you!!

[@eroccha]

It was like that because he was incorrectly declaring the equations principles from the beginning.

[@eroccha]

@@approved_direct_care1435 lol. Nothing about it was intelligent.

[@approved_direct_care1435]

Go back to the dictionary & rephrase your basis bro!

[@chucklemethis3329]

Even though I think Terrence is fine, has smooth vocals and is my kind of crazy, he's definitely the narcissist who wrote this about himself.

[@uchelevite]

Haters everywhere....terrence dashon howard is right and genuine man. You all hater should go get a life or better still hug a transformer. Terrence is a genius

[@cenzala22]

Talked that changed the world but can't show anything, just like Terrence

[@enobishop1419]

Why is hate have to be projected ? - why care if you don't care? That's what is so illogical... ?