Unveiling the Barnett Hyper 405XP: Value Meets Performance

[@benwood240]

The only problem i have found with the Bow is you have to use the Hyper flight bolts.

[@randallflores-qr8cs]

Was leaving out the arrow weight an oversight, or an attempt to cover for this bow being waaay slower than Barnett claims?

[@MichealBacon]

1:37 So basically you assembled this bow with stock components/arrows according to specs.. and only achieved 386fps on an advertised 405fps bow. What a joke. This should relabelled the Hyper 386 XP. This is only a $300 bow at best. Thanks for the heads-up

[@randallflores-qr8cs]

I was thinking the same thing. I also noticed two weeks later these guys have not responded to your concerns, speaks volumes about their integrity!

[@towely]

uh.... if you're that worked up over it, you better not buy any bow on the market... ever... it's, unfortunately, pretty industry standard to advertise a higher IBO than you're ever going to see because they use lightweight arrow setups for their advertised numbers. Are you new to archery?

[@Douger318]

Nice little bow.

[@Zale180]

Sweet and not a bad price

[@Oleman72]

Okay I am putting this challenge out to every bow reviewer I can. I would love to see a comp between the flagship bow of 2023 against the budget bow of 2023. At 50 yards point test and honest. The hand shock dose not factor in when you are shooting a animal. The us as consumers could put a dollar amount for each bow. It would take guts to do this. Also it would take someone with great integrity to do this honestly. I would love to watch this review.