Upcoming DANGERS If You're A Gun Owner...

[@GRockBlues]

I still dont see the need for people to own guns...if no one owns a gun there will be no gun violence

[@AttyTomGrieve]

Yeah, screw people who cannot overpower multiple attackers, right? I guess good luck to the old, disabled, and weak vs attackers, rapists and home invaders? No right to self-defense: might makes right?

[@GRockBlues]

@@AttyTomGrieve I suppose

[@gregroot198519]

@@GRockBlues smoothbrain mindset 🙄

[@heyjer51]

Guns will remain somewhere in the world , people with negative emotions and will power to hurt others will also remain unfortunately. no mater what vehicle is used

[@Quentin217]

No one else wants to be restricted according to what you do not see. You are free to go on with not having a gun. You are not free to impose that privation upon us. Under the highest law of the land, neither is any government entity within the United States. Those that do and violators of the US Consitution and as such traitors to their oaths of office. I know that you are much to young to remember it, but there was a very long stretch of human history, thousands of years, in which guns were absent, and there was no "gun violence." Guns that one could carry individually were not invented until the tag end of the Hundred Years War back in the middle 15th century. For that there was no shortage of ultra-violence. In mediaeval times, the lives of most people were literally lorded over by barons, earles, and dukes who were backed by professional soldiers who ruled through greater strength and fighting ability and the possession of swords and armour. Stupid, low, and common peasants, most people, were not allowed to have weapons and were monitored closely as were blacksmiths who could manufacture them. The invention and evolution of firearms played a large role in ending the mediaeval period.

[@mrmyturn2]

Let’s go on the offense by branding anti-2nd tormentors as “anti-constitutionalists”. Or anti-Americans.

[@jaynecobb1]

"anti-Americans". I like that.

[@5jjt]

They seem to fit the definition of: Domestic Terrorist because the 2A is vital for national security.

[@jackdaicole7595]

Domestic terrorists

[@lappydog9020]

Absolutely!!!!!

[@GOP-SAVE-AMERICA]

The Communist's have always taken over once they have, by any means possible, removed their Political Opponents, They just finished filing charges against President Trump just ahead of an upcoming election folks. They have been trying to disarm us for countless years now, and they've been using the School Shootings to strengthen their argument for doing so. This is why they have flat refused the idea of having our children protected by Armed Citizens, period. Seriously, once they get our Guns, America is HISTORY....

[@johnochicago8457]

Excellent synopsis of the 2nd Amendment challenges and the future. Red Flag Laws must be challenged. They are basically Ex Parte and violate the right to Due Process.

[@johnochicago8457]

@@tristenklein225 I don't understand how the states can legally disregard the SC. There should be penalties for that.

[@gregstone8891]

Red flag happened to me after all was done and all the resources used and found not guilty nothing happened to the person who falsely accused me!! Nothing nothing happened that person!! Total bullshit!!

[@Bodhi1satva]

States should be required to pay for any and all appeals to the Courts where SCOTUS has already made decisions regarding constitutionality. The states continue to ignore these decisions because they know that most of us can’t afford this lengthy, expensive process. As long as it costs them nothing, they have nothing to lose.

[@johnochicago8457]

@@tristenklein225 Well add another problem to that. SC has our main ally in Justice Thomas. There are three judges on the left that don't rule based on the constitution. That may be a future problem given Thomas's age. The actual enemy is the left and whoever had infiltrated the alphabet agencies. To answer your question it's going to have to be you and me working to get those morons out of office. They have been groomed for years to do whatever it takes to destroy our country. Soros has stated it publically. I guess the people that really want to save this country may need to be the ones that refresh the tree of liberty and you know what that means. We have no means of forcing the states to obey SCOTUS rulings. I wish we could simply state if you fail to comply with the Bill of Rights and Scotus Rulings that affirm that than you are no longer part of USA. Unfortunately, SCOTUS rulings have no teeth. No power to do that.

[@brucemorrison2132]

EXACTLY !!

[@majic5zero]

One thing that would be beneficial to viewers, I think, is to periodically have experienced 2A lawyers from each state as guests and have them explain some of the more important points of firearms and self-defense laws in their individual states. Nice to see you with your own channel, by the way, Tom. I enjoyed your appearances on the USCCA channel and am looking forward to see how you develop your own channel in the future, here.

[@davep4610]

I'm over 60 and the worst crime I've ever done is a handful of speeding tickets in my life. But two of the areas you touched on here could combine in a bad way. On a given day if I decide to legally conceal-carry, then I have a personal rule that I never leave a gun unattended in a car. Period. As the anti-2A people define more and more places as "sensitive where we cannot take a gun", the risk increases that someday I might violate a sensitive place rule and maybe, possibly, somehow it gets discovered and I get convicted of a crime. Then I would "be a felon" and lose my 2A rights simply because I safely and properly conceal-carried into a place that somebody defined I should not take a gun. The anti-2A people would call that a victory.........

[@robboat6269]

The only place you shouldn't be able to carry is in a court room. Anywhere else should be fine. Being told you can't in certain places is an infringement on a person's freedom. Why do people want to live in a free country then want to restrict someone else's freedom. If you dont like guns maybe the USA is not for you. Just a thought.

[@aaronjackson5862]

You are spot on about forgetting and carrying were your supposed to. My dad has done that upon occasion. Oops 🙊

[@rishz7857]

Remove guns, freedom stripping tyranny follows.

[@guyinoue7710]

here in Hawaii they basically made every place except the sidewalks a sensitive place basically making conceal carry useless

[@guyinoue7710]

@@Kosher_Slider that’s what I’m saying

[@gabrielortiz665]

Lifelong Chicagoan here. Thank you for being our Voice 💯

[@peanut3050]

TOPICS FOR YOUR VIDEOS:........ AMMO BACKGROUND CHECKS,-- LENDING GUNS,-- NO GUN CARRY ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH OUT A FENCE,-- CA ROSTER,-- CONVERTING SINGLE SHOT TO SEMI, TRANSPORT OF LOCKED UP AND UNLOADED,---10 DAY WAIT FOR THOSE WHO HAVE A CCW--THE LIST IN CA IS ENDLESS! THANK YOU FOR YOUR VIDEOS!

[@Osprey1994]

You are making some of the best legal content surrounding the 2nd Amendment right now, keep it up. Please don't resort to clickbait, I have seen a few other channels fall into the trap of clickbait and farming the same subject with different titles.

[@jimbo7758]

Great video Tom! I would like you to do a video on the anti-2A crowd’s playbook when it comes to attacking gun owner rights. Keep up the good work.

[@Mark-uh4zd]

Their playbook is death by 1000 cuts. Little by little, until gun ownership is owning a single shot 22 or is too expensive for the average citizen to own and shoot via fees and taxes. Funny how they really want to ban AR platform and similar other platforms, even though the ar15 is responsible for less deaths than blunt objects. Once they do that, it’s on to handguns because “too concealable” and they kill the most (they will include suicides in this count as well). Next will be larger calibers because “long range sniper machine” and “nobody needs a firearm that goes passed 300 yards.” Shotguns will be next because “close range death machine that even the nazis feared.” What gets me the most about the “gun violence” number is that they always include suicides in the number. When somebody gangs themselves, we don’t call it “rope violence”.. when somebody jumps in front of train, we don’t call it train violence. Same thing with cutting. We don’t call it razor violence.

[@davidrobinson7112]

When do we outlaw an assault on the Supreme law that is our constitution. Those wishing to ha ve us disarm are Communist Chinese who wish to take over the US without firing a single shot.

[@christianknight2905]

Thank you, first time viewer and enjoyed this very much. You have a calm, down to earth delivery style that is easy to follow and enjoyable to listen to. Subscribed

[@AttyTomGrieve]

Thanks Christian!

[@deanmccormick8070]

I also very much like your matter-of-fact style. Thank you, Sir!

[@aread7]

Yes, please produce a video on the playbook. Thank you.

[@regiperrault9840]

Thank you so much for all the work you guys do 👍

[@billmullins6833]

New watcher here. Love your work! By all means, please enlighten us as to the other side's playbook.

[@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors]

Thank you for the insightful analysis. One thing I would like to see but I don't know how feasible it would be is to describe what "effective advocacy and networking" looks like for your average concerned citizen. I get it, we've all heard, "call/email your elected official". But I take the inspiration for my question from my experiences with a dedicated gun-control activist who is married to an acquaintance of mine. She is an activist who is enabled by Everytown and a few other gun-hating organizations. How can we connect disparate pro-2A citizens to coordinate a grassroots army to counter those efforts. I donate to the GOA, 2AF, NAGR and NRA. I contact my elected officials but I don't get successful feedback about my efforts or who else in my city, county, state are doing the same.🤔

[@kubikariYOU]

Thanks for the video. You are very well spoken and deliver valuable and timely information. It is very much appreciated.

[@747-8]

Tom, appreciate you diving into this subject. What I don't understand is how under other precedent setting cases we see the states effectively cease all lawmaking that would be in conflict with the ruling ,or if there is a such a conflicting law, the plaintiffs challenging appear to get immediate injunctive relief. In the case of the 2A law, we have a continuous stream of bad legislation that has to be litigated over every nuance of the law and the cases just drag on for years. This is trampling our rights as a legislature can pass bills all day & night in direct conflict with Supreme Court rulings you noted. What if anything can be done given the power imbalance of legislatures who continue to pass new laws clearly in conflict with multiple precedents and the state attorneys who have the infinite budgets to draw out the cases for years.

[@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors]

Good point.

[@douglasscovil3447]

the democrats control the U.S. senate, but a strong majority of the state legislatures are republican controlled. this is important because it prevents the radical democrats from holding a constitutional convention to revoke all of the Amendments in the Bill of Rights. (remember, the lefties think that the Constitution is a "living" document which should be altered to suit their utopian communist desires)

[@redryder1146]

Thank you for all your outstanding work I enjoy your videos I would like to see you take a deep dive into magazine bans if you would thank you!!!

[@jamesbell7220]

Tom, and just for the record, YOUR language and demeanor are what is so needed. Others on the more enthusiastic nature would benefit the cause to adapt themselves to your example.

[@tommckahan418]

Great video update! I would absolutely love to hear the playbook for the anti-Second Amendment people. Love to know how to defeat these guys

[@craftycri]

Militia Act of 1795 applied to every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between the ages of 18 and 45. I think the age of the 2a right applying seems pretty clear in our Nation's history and tradition, and we can toss the sexist, racist limitations. :) Thx Tom, really appreciate your work!

[@jimwalker2224]

But what about those over 45?

[@turtletruth]

STATE SLAVES "HAVE NO RIGHT" TO PROTECT LIFE! (NO FIREARM RIGHTS) IMPROPER Felony Laws permanently remove 2nd amendment rights for drinking & driving or smoking pot & driving offenses! (CONTINUE READING!) Who and where is the injured party to question in court when all of the offenses are pullover-and-blow arrests or, I smelt the odor of marijuana, void of an accident, incident, victim, or injured party? This illusory state felony law lacks Jurisprudence! State law says 3 offenses in a lifetime create a permanent non-reversible felony. These newly created (Mom & Dad) "non-violent" FELONS cannot ever protect themselves, their wealth, or their families! They have become eternal Slaves! SLAVES HAVE NO RIGHT TO PROTECT LIFE! (Or to even possess a single bullet) STATE LAW lacks the victim requirement yet has nexus with FEDERAL LAW for state felony offenses! The state felony law does not distinguish between "having a victim and injured party" vs "victimless" without any victim or injured party! (Simple pullover & blow arrests or on police testimony of marijuana odor!) IRONICALLY the state law allows the DUI (Driving under the Influence) driver to keep the driving privilege and the vehicle, but not the 2nd amendment right to life liberty, and pursuit of happiness... Current state law clearly lacks distinction between two distinct separate classes of offenses! (With/Without Victim) THE ILLUSORY FIND WALDO LAW INVENTS SLAVERY AND SERVITUDE OUT OF THIN AIR WITHOUT REQUIRING A VICTIM and, THAT is a SHAME!....... - Turtletruth (Semper Fidelis)...

[@craftycri]

@@jimwalker2224 lol, well I think everyone wonders about the floor for the 2A, not the ceiling :)) but, point taken :)

[@762x69]

I'll be more than happy to hear a video or series on the racist/sexist/discriminatory origins and implementation of gun control. Thanks for all you do Tom and Crew!

[@AttyTomGrieve]

It is in the works! Already hours spent researching

[@nicholaslacey5861]

@Tom Grieve What about the possibility of a home state issued conceal carry license being recognized in all 50 states?Is that a possibility now with bruen?

[@Mr.Vet1969]

@@AttyTomGrieve Tom, I enjoy your videos and your professional approach in presenting legal self-defense information. As regards historical racist/discriminatory actions against African Americans with regard to gun ownership during the slavery period and beyond , I've just completed a book "Negroes and the Gun" written by Nicholas Johnson. It's a great read and provides a key perspective on how important gun ownership was to African Americans in their struggle against slavery.

[@Osprey1994]

​@Nicholas Lacey Realistically, it should be. Everything I have looked at over the years points to the idea that reciprocity SHOULD exist without needing a federal law forcing states to allow it.

[@kennethmeeker6369]

There coming for the Christian nationalist first and the tranphobes same difference lol

[@in2life415]

I would LOVE for you to touch on "relief from weapons disability" and how to go about filing and tips for a successful restoration!

[@imrich884]

I’d love to see you expound on magazines limits and cosmetic feature prohibitions, namely as it applies to the NY SAFE Act in a post Bruen world.

[@markpaulin884]

They are coming for every gun eventually. Stand strong.

[@timewen3660]

Thank you Tom,very informative . Looking forward to seeing more from you ! Maybe keep an eye on Maryland for us and the potential expansion of the gun free zones . Keep up the good work and thanks for keeping us informed, knowledge is power.

[@GmanGSW]

I agree with you. Along with Maryland, Washington, Michigan and some other states regarding the potential for the "sensitive carrying" zones the Anti-2Aers and Anti-2Aer state government law makers love to grasp onto one item or phrase out of an entire paragraph or page, if it fits what they "like" or want to have happen. Thanks, again, Tom!

[@skatelegged]

I reside in NY, which reacted very quickly to Bruen by making almost EVERYWHERE a "sensitive area". Every place of business must post a sign stating they are OK with legal gun carry, and if a place of business has no sign, then BY DEFAULT THAT MEANS it is illegal to carry concealed in that place. This law was passed, but not advertised, and so of course most business owners have never heard of this law, (and obviously have no sign!) Talk about a quick law that has no precedent, and no consistency with history or tradition! So anyway... my request here would be that you keep abreast of the NY battles, and let us know who (if anyone) is fighting this particular battle (ie the "we'll just make EVERYWHERE a sensitive area" concept), and also let us know how those battles are going! Thanks, and keep up the good work!

[@c.curtisclements770]

Yes, Tom, please do a video on the anti-gunners' playbook!

[@jks3849]

Anti gunners do not belong here in this country

[@jks3849]

The top industry supporting anti 2a politicians is usually that of the trial lawyers and law firms

[@hught5697]

Your voice comes across clear and concise . Your pronunciation is great . I have so much trouble trying to figure out what some people are saying . I thought maybe my hearing was going south . I can hear and understand every word . Thanks

[@PAL-jb1xs]

Great video as always. Thanks for taking the time to create this content. I believe the biggest threat we face is the fact that our schools no longer teach critical thinking skills but focus on indoctrination. A right not understood or appreciated is easily taken. This is not an accident imo. Please create a video on why the anti 2A forces are focusing on standard capacity magazines. I would love to hear your perspective.

[@GmanGSW]

I concur. I've always known "standard capacity" magazines to be STANAG magazines (NATO STANdard AGreement magazines for all NATO countries magazines, drafted in 1980, so that all magazines would be 20-30+ rounds and fit in most NATO 5.56x45mm AR15 lowers), so (though I know where the Anti-2Aers got their 10 round magazines "hunting story") I'd also like to know why the Anti-2Aers are focusing on reducing STANAG magazines from 20-30 rounds to 10 rounds. Not accidental imo.

[@johndonaldson6903]

You mentioned the laws in Oklahoma and a few other states. As a resident of Oklahoma, I'd like to see that video. You have a plethora of great info, and I appreciate your taking the time to put these videos. THANKS!

[@truno7]

Love you brother. You’re doing God’s work!

[@t5idlvz]

I live in NY state. What I'm not understanding is why I need a permit to purchase a handgun. Not to conceal carry. Just to have in my house. We can buy shotguns or rifles with a 4473. Why is it that we need a permit just to "look at" a handgun in the store?

[@bob_mosavo]

"I saw it on the Internet, so it probably is [true]." 🤣🤣😂😂 Thanks, Tom! I needed a good laugh!

[@AttyTomGrieve]

Np Bmo. Always great to see you!

[@j777]

Awesome content! Thanks! I'm most interested in the left play book to counter.

[@gla8174]

I am new to the 2A community and have only recently gotten involved in the fight for our rights. We have been asked to submit testimonies at recent legislative hearings on gun control laws. Could you perhaps make a video about what you feel are the most effective things to include in our testimonies to give them more power? Thanks

[@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors]

GL A, first, welcome to the 2A community. We're glad you're here. Secondly, that's a good question. Improving our advocacy is a worthy goal and Mr. Grieve could undoubtedly provide good feedback al9ng those lines.

[@Captain-ln3vh]

So I watch Tom all the time. My question is can I use these as continued education? I’m kidding actually, but man Tom is a great resource and I really respect his input.

[@richardhutchinson4016]

Thanks for another informative video. You are spot on with all the battlegrounds. Do you have any thoughts on the timeline? It took scotus over a decade between their last major opinions. Do you think we need to wait for another decade? (And who knows what the scotus will look like then)

[@Diddley-js6lf]

You have nailed the ones I wanted to hear about. I believe as they change if you can come on and do exactly as you just did basically give us all a Look inside the knowledge you have.

[@AnarSchism.]

Excellent presentation

[@MrScottr66]

There's a very fine line on losing our constitutional 1A and 2A rights we have to keep fighting these tyrants or we lose and that will definitely be the end. Thank you Tom for keeping us up on our 2A laws and whats down the road.

[@neiluscook2283]

Thanks 4 covering this. One problem in the tactical stance of citizens who are in litigation is to forget that THE ATTACK of the anti's is against the Objects of the self defense right; i.e. mag capacities, bumpstocks etc. but these are in law irrelevant to the meaning of the 2nd Amendment; its purpose is that every human being have the capability of armed defense, wherever they are at a given moment, in public or in private scenes. The focus, Constitutionally, is the person, not the kinetic means! We must not lose sight of this ! We cannot allow ourselves to be "nibbled to death by ducks!" History is clear that the person/people must have whatever means it takes to remain safe,OR, TYRANTS WILL RULE. This is 1000's of years of history, not simply legislative US "history."

[@markaustin2094]

Tom, everything. Thank you for all of your thoughts.

[@NYRP_Dan]

No one can take away our rights. I’m happy that you put out these videos.

[@fairlylocal607]

Actually they can. And they will. They are willing to use violence and the people who want to "protect their rights" don't actually want to use the rights for what they are actually meant for. SMDH

[@jesseregenauer630]

@@fairlylocal607 At the same time there are untold millions of us quite prepared to die if necessary in the course of exercising our natural right to self preserve. Living as a fully disarmed fully controlled slave is not an option......

[@professorronin9648]

@@jesseregenauer630 I hope you are right. Ruby Ridge, Waco and Malheur would indicate you are not. Bodies may be stacked. The question is who's will they be?

[@fairlylocal607]

@@jesseregenauer630 What you don't realize is that the enemy has already used the tactic "death by 1000 cuts" and they play the long game. Our nation is already one of fully controlled slaves...they just happened to be armed, but mostly de-fanged. The sad truth is that we love our velvet chains more than dangerous liberty.

[@fairlylocal607]

@Danny Timms Indeed. The communists have almost achieved pure fulfillment of their plan to destroy the US from within by debasing the culture and sowing division. Just look at any video you see on social media. People just pull out their phones to record rather than help their fellow neighbor. And why would they help? If you get involved you are just as likely to get charged with a crime and lose your life in a rape cage rather than be treated as the hero or even just "good citizen". Stick a fork in us we're done. Only outright secession or some other apocalyptic disaster scenario will change the game now...

[@MZ-rv1bu]

I really like this update to current state of the law. I hope you do more like every time there is a new loss or win, or monthly, whichever is less cumbersome but keeps us up to date. Thank you for doing this!

[@Ppk391]

Thanks for all you do for us, Tom. I would enjoy seeing you delve into selective carve-outs that established certain privileged people with rights that the rest of us don’t have. For example, Congressmen cannot be arrested in DC, retired cops can carry everywhere but we can’t. Is this a 14th amendment issue?

[@ETHRON1]

Excellent video Tom...20 minutes well spent.

[@scottamy6496]

If people are deemed safe enough to be released from prison and have served their sentences then I feel their rights should be restored! If they are too dangerous to be trusted with their 2nd amendment rights, then they shouldn’t be out among society!!!

[@percyfaith11]

We all know that prison is a graduate school for criminals. It's about punishment, not reform. Plenty of unsafe people are released from prison every year. Check out the very high rate of recidivism. They shouldn't be out in society but they are.

[@darronshirley7886]

I strongly agree I would say that they should be done with all probation and or parole but most definitely need to be a full citizen again and not a life sentence for any felony charges I have family members that have been in prison and they wouldn't hurt a fly so why wouldn't we all want them to be able to vote and own a gun to protect themselves the only rational reason is that the government wants to take away all our rights and so they will have the lowest of scum attack everyone possible to make as many people as possible into a felon and destroy the ability to vote out the trash in government jobs

[@julianicarvalho7667]

No most prisoners that get out are usually going to repeat their offenses look at statistics

[@marioacevedo5077]

Great video. A review of the gun-grabbers playbook would be welcome.

[@2009Berghof]

A sensitive place should be a place with limited access, armed security, with metal detectors and X-ray machines such as TSA checkpoints.

[@stephaniemusick171]

Please do a video with an analysis of the Constitutionality of magazine capacity legislation. This is of particular interest to me as I reside in Colorado. We have had a 15 round limit in effect since 2013. RMGO fought the ban in Colorado state courts for three years and it went to the Colorado State Supreme Court and that court (populated with Democratic Party installed Jurists) upheld the capacity limit using interest balancing analysis. RMGO filed suit against the capacity limit in 2022 (post Bruen) in Federal District Court and it is in process. The anti 2A defendants in the suit, (State of Colorado with a lot of Bloomberg money assisting them), are of course arguing that the ban is Constitutional as firearms magazines are “firearm accessories” and are thus not protected by the Second Amendment.

[@williamwhaley7842]

This only my OPINION! If you are old enough to fight in a war and possible die defending this country, then you are old enough to own a firearm!

[@ggarton333]

Would love to see a video focused on magazines. All of your videos are very informative all around though, can’t get enough of them. Thank you.

[@bsam0923]

Yes Tom. I would love for you to address 19th century gun regulations as it applies to race in relation to Heller. I hope it could not be used to craft laws with race as a concern but I am skeptical.

[@bsam0923]

Bruen. Not Heller. Sorry.

[@GARZ_3O5]

Please go into detail. I love the way you break things down. Please!

[@gifthorse3675]

The 2A has been severely degraded for about 90 years and is not too far away from its inevitable death. I’m sure I’ll see its abolishment or complete neutering within my lifetime. But what I’m most worried about is how they’ll go about collecting them seeing that they have a registry.

[@williambaker4417]

Seems like you have brought up lots of worthwhile topics. I’d think it would be great if you choose the order of which you think would be most relevant. Thanks for providing this information.

[@johncrowder7650]

Absolutely LOVE your presentations. Great job!!!

[@robertmcintyre9395]

Thank you for your excellent review of the status of the 2A.

[@upnorthoffcuts929]

Great video Tom.Hop to see more content like this in the future. Keep up the great work.

[@thomaswilson1145]

Nice job Tom, I really enjoyed it. Keep up the good fight.

[@learnshareevolve1842]

Great roundup and contextualization of current trends re: 2A legislation in the US!

[@markpeavy4005]

Definitely would like you to cover the "anti-2a playbook" you mentioned, unless you have and I haven't seen it yet. Thank you for your work!

[@guardianminifarm8005]

Well developed & delivered. Thanks a bundle.

[@michaeldurling793]

Tom, I am curious to know which is dominant Federal law or State law with regard to the 2A? As with marijuana laws many States have passed their own laws disregarding Federal law and for the most part gone unchallenged.

[@bthemedia]

GREAT summary and foresight! BG2 11:46 “ordinary weapon”… in contrast to “dangerous and unusual”? Can you dive into that? CRS has said that phrase was taken out of context, and perhaps should be dangerous AND unusual AND used/displayed in a threatening way? Others say “dangerous OR unusual” (4 boxes diner says that is wrong). I would think any military or NATO standard issue weapon is “ordinary” and the 2A was for arms used by civilians and military all the same.

[@ericfreeman7321]

Thank you for continuing to create such informative content, I have especially appreciated your previous videos providing a prosecutor's perspective in order to help me think through not just the physical risks, but also the legal ramifications following an exercise of my 2A to protect myself. There's been quite a bit of defensive litigation to remove infringing legislation, but I'd be interested to see if there is any offensive efforts against future constitutional infringements. Legislatures have nearly limitless funding to create and defend constitutional infringements, and citizens are stuck paying the salaries and expenses for creating and defending those infringements, while also donating for the challenges; it seems like citizens are footing the bill for both sides. I'd also be interested to see if there's any movement to hold gun control accountable for the claims that it makes. Do we see any emerging accountability regarding "sensitive spaces"? Unfortunately, I still live in a state that believes in such concepts and hopefully that changes in the future, many people I know are unable to escape these ideas in their legislatures. Since citizens aren't legally allowed to carry in "sensitive spaces", are the governments/businesses that classify a location as a "sensitive space" accountable legally and civilly liable if there is an attack for putting those citizens in harms way by disallowing them to personal protection in the event of such an attack?

[@reddog1ish]

Great video! Thanks

[@tomv2807]

Hi Tom, love your videos. My name is Tom and I live in Illinois. I was wondering if you could do a video on the complete history of gun control in this country thanks keep up the good work.

[@optimusprime523]

Yes Tom please do an episode on Magazines or what I believe Judge Benitez described as ammunition holding devices. It would be great if you could include how you would expect the court challenges to Colorado’s 15 round limit to new magazines vs. grandfathered standard capacity magazines

[@fredbloggs843]

Your mention of an 'anti-2A' playbook is intriguing. Please expand? Many Thanks!

[@jameskennerly9748]

Awesome information, thank you Sir!

[@royjennings4781]

Thanks for the info , & A 5 star review.

[@Vargre]

Your like, the anti-gun cults worst nightmare. A prior prosecutor turned defender, and the knowledge you have about gun laws and how they apply to law abiding citizens, the massive amount of this knowledge you share....they must hate you so much. Personally, these vids are some of the best on the internet. I have learned a TON in just the short amount of time ive been a subscriber. Just want to say thanks for everything you do for us. You rock, Mr. Grieve.

[@optimusprime523]

It would also be great if you could provide some insight on how to properly exercise federal interstate firearms transport rights to separately secure and transport firearms from braces which have been remade into other useful personal equipment such as AV kit microphone booms, garden tools, etc.

[@Mrblueridgeman]

Yes. Please do a video on the anti-2A strategy

[@dandyjones1185]

Thank you Tom. Great topics!

[@BunnyRabbit775]

Great information! Thanks!

[@OdeeOz]

*Mr. Grieve, **_where_** in the U.S. Constitution, does the 2nd Amendment specify **_How a citizen may carry_** a firearm? Does the 2nd Amendment not bypass Concealed Carry regulations and laws?*

[@sman3569]

Tom, as you know NY immediately crafted a new anti-2A law ( CCIA, Concealed Carry Improvement Act ) after Bruen, which is even worse than what Bruen dealt with. It's been challenged, but the challenges have been stagnating. One of the judges in Second Circuit ( ? ) forget which exactly, but made a comment "all these people going around with guns". Information is very hard to find, so I would like to see a close watch on this issue, and the status of it. The CCIA is a slap in the face of SCOTUS and the people of NY. Thanks

[@XrayMike17plus1]

Thanks, Tom. I would like to see gun owners, including myself get more information on two tier balancing and why Bruen struck that down. More information on weapons considered dangerous AND unusual(goes to common use) . More info on chevron deference and why it's bad. A bit more rounding out on when the burden of proof shifts to the government versus text, history and tradition. There's a lot to unpack but the little I have learned has really helped me to understand why and how the recent decision by that nit-wit activist judge in Illinois on the 'assault weapon' ban fell apart re Bruen. Just hit the mechanics of these concepts without going too far afield. IMO it's important for those of us that value the 2A understand it's upper-level workings .

[@KenRod1969]

Great video here Tom. Thanks.

[@doc8579]

Thanks for the clear explanation.

[@RemoteViewr1]

Really enjoy your posts. Very interesting broad over view here. I suggest we are looking at a. A 20 to 30 year maturation of the Second Amendment b. This issue is a States Rights vs. Federal Powers. The States and Feds have been at this for the last 100 years, I see this being an ongoing 100 battle. It's not just guns rights and incidentally knife rights.

[@scrider5493]

I am interested in any topic you do an additional video on to expand the topics you raise, they are all important b-c they are fodder for attack by anti 2A crowd. Thanks for your work.

[@steveninaz9576]

Thank you Sir

[@highlife7241]

Gr8 videos Tom! Thanks! Would you consider telling us about the history and intent of NFA? I’m not understanding why the umbrage over an 11.5” barrel PISTOL vs a 16” RIFLE. Also I don’t get the concern over Silencer/Compressor registration requirements. Interested in the Big Picture perspective. Looks like we’re in for a protracted 2A fight in the courts coming to a neighborhood near you. 😖

[@dorzak975]

Like most gun regulation, it was written based on the fears of the day. Automatic firearms were in there because of Mob violence. The St. Valentine's Day Massacre in Chicago was only a few years before. There was concerns about poachers using suppressors. They were going to ban handguns, and worried about people adding a stock on them to work around the ban. So they banned short barreled rifles. The handgun ban was dropped to get it passed, but the SBR ban remained. They were thinking of things like the stocks for the handguns like 1873 SAA, the Luger holster/stocks, etc as workarounds to a handgun ban.

[@danielreeves6485]

Thank you for the video brother.

[@dorothytipton1974]

Yes the playbook as well

[@willaimwinchell1813]

From what I have read is U.S. Post offices are off limits to gun carry. They have posters on bulletin boards. You can't even be on the property / parking lot with a gun in your car. If you park in the parking lot with a gun on you or in your car, and if the Post Office has what is called special handling area where Guns and Drugs or other Dangerous item are recieved or shipped you will get inhanced charges put on you. Their is several cases on line where employees have been charged.

[@rlm9825]

Great video. Thanks

[@devinhinkson3798]

Great video, thanks for your work

[@myronmarsh7582]

Good job! Keep ‘em coming!

[@osdhat6366]

Tom, please do a video on the historical detail of 19th century and older gun control laws.

[@AttyTomGrieve]

Check out my series on the racist history of gun control. Two videos are already out!

[@addieolson1978]

What’s your suggestion on what citizens can do to help stop or amend legislation going into discussion? MN has SF1723 coming through the pike that will try to implement registration, “assault weapon” bans, large capacity magazine bans, etc. MN also has a very low rate of gun homicides, nearly neck in neck with CA even without the restrictions that CA has. I’d love to see a video about what we can do besides vote those out who bring these forward! Thanks for all you do!

[@scienceobrien8335]

Well done video, solid information. Thank you

[@SMac-bq8sk]

New viewer here. Excellent analysis and presentation. You've earned my sub.

[@revv45acp71]

Thank you! Please keep teaching!

[@richardmayeux9163]

Tom, I am a CCA member with book and real life training, but still watch out for the real world situations. Even Jim Rockford needed a lawyer.

[@johnwelsh4750]

RIP James Garner Veteran & Actor & GREAT AMERICAN, GOD BLESS !

[@donaldmartin7109]

Excellent research. Thank you.

[@davidmulcrone7394]

Great video. Like to see videos on all your suggestions

[@jaynecobb1]

14:04 The Mayor of Santa Fe has declared that many public buildings are "schools" because some sort of educational event occurred there at some time in the past. So now, weapons are banned in the public parking structure downtown under his twisted definition of "school". That is crazy.

[@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors]

Jayne Cobb... LOL. Shiny!

[@jaynecobb1]

@@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors Apparently you have heard of me. You are probably familiar with Vera too.

[@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors]

@@jaynecobb1 "... a Callahan full-bore auto-lock, customized trigger, double-cartridge thorough gauge... and it is your very favorite gun"... why yes, yes I am familiar with Vera. I'm something of a Browncoat. Pleasure to meet you.

[@CJLiveFromTheOutdoors]

@@jaynecobb1 I also spent a few years of my childhood growing up in New Mexico. It pains me to see the beautiful state I grew up in and loved ruined by liberals. Santa Fe has been a liberal stronghold for years, but I remember it in the 70's and 80s. It wasn't this bad, this unhinged.