Amazing! I thought common sense and thinking had been outlawed in this country as we seldom see it today. 21 feet was said to be the average distance of a gun battle. Any pistol can be deadly at least for 300 yds. 21 feet is merely the average. Many encounters are point blank. The officers were justified in opening fire and had they waited 1.5 more seconds, one or both would have been injured. I have never understood why someone can endanger hundreds of people on the highway in a high-speed chase, then get out of the car and run trying to evade arrest and the police need to be track stars to catch him. A shot in the leg stops the chase and it's a lot more punishment than he's likely to get from the judge. The officers above could have stopped their assailant by shooting the legs but they didn't have time to consider it. I'm still surprised a California court is capable of making a rational finding.

We need all of the information that we can get , or at least I do .

Block the cops ability to see in the car. With cardboard... as soon as you stop in car.... exercise privacy

That addiction definition is the most open ended bs I've seen in a while

Open carry in ALL states.

If i may add to the warning shot discussion. Ive seen several times where the intended victim just plain missed the assailant, the statement that ruined their defense was because their ego couldn't handle missing and they said they issued a warning shot. If you miss just say you missed.

what is the leagal law on welfare checks and coming iin your home even if youdont answer the door

Thank you, Tom. Appreciate the commentary and news.

Making laws hard to understand and then doubling down on them is a trap, plain and simple. A person who wants to be legal may well find themselves in jail. This is wrong and on purpose. They can easily change for the citizens safety instead of hazard. They would now be considered to be preying on the law abiding citizenship.

Civilian ranges very seldom allow the DRAWING and firing of handguns, open or concealed, so there is nearly NO TRAINING allowed. So, the GAP is huge.

obviously, no crime, we the people one of the people demand for a dismissal, which is our right, and now submits a bill and this document for the record. My costs and fees for having to defend this frivolous case of the deprives and attempt to diminish the 2nd amendment by conflicting laws, may it please the court. Having a gun without a license is not a crime. Obviously, we have a right to the 2nd amendment. Nothing else can be added to a as a sub paragraph to implement the taken of the 2nd amendment. Nor any elements of a crime. Courts are not to take a basic essential alienable right 2nd amendment that is a declared right and turn it into equity or convert it into a crime. The infractions writ of assist and bill of attainder and declared by any beneficiary an American in agreement by contract law or any repugnant codes statutes and proclamations and orders and police policies, bill of pain is illegal. No legislative can abrogate or diminish break down supreme laws at any level. They are to know the law and make laws that are not in conflict. The judges the lawyers and the police officers are to protect the guaranteed supreme laws of the land and be bound to the oath of their office and the promise by their delegated authority. Even supreme laws that are repugnant laws if any are claimed. No institutions can make laws in conflict with the American people’s contract that is guaranteed. May it please this court or whom it may concern. This matter should be closed. And all weapons must be returned. Thank you, Dwane Kirkland, ***** Claimed Beneficiary’s signature, 1-207 1-308/{Dwane Eugene Kirkland UCC 1-207 1-308 w/o prejudice} {sealed under Gods laws}_______________________________________________________________ All collected facts and research is from black’s law dictionary and Amjur prudence Constitutional law 97, and 16, and Shepard’s citations of supreme case laws that trump all. If anyone want a full report, please ask it would be overly exciting to share the findings and discovery on the actual law. My favorite case law Marbury v Madison 1803, the famous john marshal disposition and dissent. And of course, my teacher Carl Miller one of our greatest soldiers of our time. Bill of rights office out of Arkansas and our great Montana, and Texas and all sister states in harmony. Each case in relationship to the merit can be shared.

Since the burden on the prosecution is to prove that you did willfully and knowingly avoid a known duty or task under the law with immoral certainty, he cannot perform that task and use any conflicting so called laws sub paragraph or any legislative fiat, because you obviously have your constitutional immunity to that. The previous case, Shuttlesworth says they could not even punish you. The case before that said you do not even need a license for the exercise of a right. And the case before that said your constitutional right is supreme over any state law. The 2nd amendment is a right and has been all the way back to the 13 original colonies and even furthermore back in history and laws by the enabling clause prior Constitutions and even all the way back to the mega carta. So, if they pass a law in violation of your constitution, the constitution overwhelms the state law, so the law does not even exist in law. And remember the state Constitutions say the same thing as the supreme law of the land. Now, since the prosecutor does not have a cause of action for which relief can be granted and has no authority and not bound to any office to take the 2nd amendment away are change it or sale it or license it or anything else for that matter, May it please we the people one of the people and the government that is under the contract of Constitutional to govern by the agreement and do not violate the 2nd amendment and ay fundamental principles and amendment and provisions declarations of rights at all levels, you honor or whom it may concerns would it please the court, counsel is specifically precluded from performing his major task, therefore, your honor, would it please the court at this time we would we the people one of the people under claimed designated beneficiary would motion most graciously for dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action for which relief may be granted. by this honorable court, and I’d kind of like to collect my costs and fees for having to defend this patently frivolous and spurious complaint and violations of the 2nd amendment, sir, may it please the court. {My bill is attached} {My pain and suffering letter is attached} The government under agreement contract and the real law, the state does not have the right to convert that right into a privilege and attack or infringe and cannot punish we the people one of the people the claimed designated beneficiaries they do, and then a claim that the prosecutor cannot prove willfulness so you.

the 2nd amendment is not up for bid or sale or change no license is required according to the states in harmony of the freedom of basic protections and life liberty and the pursue of happens and the free agency to choose and the ability to protect the STATE AND THE PEOPLE AND ONES FAMILY AND COUNTRY. And all fundamental principles and amendments and provisions and articles and declarations of rights at all levels. Now I want you to see the significance of this case in view of the case we just had. Murdock v Penn clearly established that no state could convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it. Shuttlesworth v Birm. {This applies to the 2nd amendment} Said that if the state does convert your right into a privilege and charge a license and a fee for it you can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. {The violators do not have any immunity or excuse under the supremacy clause for actions and could be held for a subject matter for the charge for the failure of oath and the constitutional amendment of the 2nd amendment is high felony treason under titl18n US 2183 high felony treason} That means they cannot punish you…they must let you go. But the violators can be punished, It is especially important that you understand first your constitution is the supreme law of the land and that you have that right, and that right shall not be infringed, and it is supposed to be enforced in favor of you, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary. {Of the iron clad contract} It is especially important that you understand that no state may convert that right into a privilege and issue a license and fee for it, and if they do. Shuttlesworth says you can ignore the license and engage in the right with impunity… They cannot punish you. Now, the next case is especially important, and it is important that you see the argument. U. S. v Bishop, 412 U. S. 346 (1973) …Basically what Bishop does is it sets a standard for what constitutes a criminal violation in terms of willful intent? Willfulness is one of the elements which is required to be proven. In any criminal element you must prove that 1. You are the party, 2. That you had a method or opportunity to do a thing, and 3. That you did so with a willful intent. Now, when we get to willful intent, willful is defined as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under the law with immoral uncertainty. Obviously, you have decided that you have relied on the United States Constitution, and you have relied on the decisions of the supreme court. So, could you have willfully done any deed or crime? By having a guaranteed right of the 2nd amendment for protections of the self and the family and the state and the country? Obviously not. So, this case stipulates that you have a perfect defense for the element of willfulness. And no actual elements of a crime and no main element a victim.

**Now comes: Let us jump to the next case: Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262 (1963) …This is another unique religious case. In this case six ministers were accused of inciting to riot and otherwise create a disturbance…Disturb the peace. They had a sit-down (this case came down in 1962). The city said they needed to have a license to have a public gathering. It went to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court said “No, you don’t have to have a license for the exercise of a 1st amendment right to freely assemble. This applies to the merits of the simple text of the 2nd amendment to and plugged in as for the guarantees of the real law v the fake law and the deceptive deference between fake laws v real laws and the other violations of the other laws in harmony as of the 14th amendment and the contract and the bill of rights. {Ans of article 6 paragraph 2. The supremacy clause}and the 9th and the10th amendment and the police powers v the police powers, The gist of the case is that black American ministers were convicted in the Alabama State Court of “Aiding and abetting in violation of criminal trespass ordinance in Birmingham Ala. The only evidence against them was to the effect that they had incited ten black students to engage in a sit-in demonstration at a white lunch counter as a protest racial segregation. The court held that on the case of Peterson v City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 (1963) that the convictions of those ten students for criminal trespass were constitutionally invalid. Since those convictions had been set aside it follows that these petitioners did not incite, aid, or albeit any crime, and therefore the convictions of these petitioners must be set aside. Now basically what they were claiming was their constitutional right to freely assemble; the city was claiming that they had to have a license to put on a demonstration, which they did not have, and they were charging them with a criminal trespass, for not having a valid license to freely assemble and/or protest. So are you seeing what I am trying to reflect of the mirror and latter, the 2nd AMENDMENT be licensed at all and cant be taken away at all and turned in to equity for judges lawyers and police officers and attorneys and any private institutions,

Stating that no laws made can conflict with the 2nd amendment and the constitution and what ever is in the contract that is in conflict is void and null and not bound to any office of any institutions. The fact of the matter an American citizen. One of we the people under contract and under agreement with nonforeign institutions, and only institutions that operate to the letter of the law and the Constitution contract. 1. that I am an American citizen and that we the people have constitutional rights. 2. 2. keep in mind “What right”? the 2nd amendment Can I pull out of the constitution contract the iron clad contract under the agreement that is locked in? 3. And I can pull the right out of the constitution…and I will give you an example: How about the right to travel freely and unencumbered, pursuant to Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969)? How about the right to keep and bear arms? 4. Does the state have the right to require a license? and fee for the exercise of the right? Only according to waiving rights and entering an unknown contract, and We the people surely do not waive any rights and do not contract without full disclosure. 5. We the people are bound to the Constitution in harmony as the judge and the attorneys and lawyers and all government institutions and corporations and all under public acts and insurance by fiduciary omissions and errors are. And if they do violate or move forward or diminish then it’s a crime. We can ignore the license and fee that is in direct conflict with the 2nd amendment and illegal bill of attainder and legislative fiat. The premise of this case is clearly established; NO STATE MAY CONVERT A SECURED LIBERTY INTO A PRIVILEGE ISSUE A LICENSE AND FEE FOR IT AND REQUIRE YOU TO HAVE THAT: OTHERWISE, YOU COMMITTED A CRIME. 2nd amendment is a liberty secured and is merits are clear it for the protections of the other amendments and the bill of rights and all 7 articles and all pertaining to the iron clad contract the iron clad contract.

If state and the government agreement enforce a law that is void and null and repugnant by enforcement with military police actions and repugnant laws coded statutes that obstructs the 2nd amendment and the free agency to freely choose. If American citizens we the people want to contract or have a license for a second amendment or obstruct one’s life liberty to think for oneself and travel freely armed in any movement and modern time. We the people one of the people are talking about here is We are American citizens We do have rights? And we do have a free agency to choose without any third arbitrary parties by force or scare tactics or governmental scheme, or trickery unknown waivers by process and forced signature or under duress or threat. Merits of the case in correlations is, what the case says that that religious and second amendment can’t be abolished or licensed group exercised their rights timely. That they had a right to worship and evangelize as they chose, and that the state came in and arbitrarily converted that right into a privilege and issued a license and a fee for it. That is totally unconstitutional. The case would also apply to the second amendment and any other claimed infringed right. I declare and believe We the people the issues apply as the same as an American claimed Beneficiary in the matter of the 2nd amendment right. No license for the second amendment is applicable denied and be implemented taken away or infringed or encroached or abrogated by legislative fiat of a bill of attainder and so-called forced license, bill of pain and any illegal enforcement form an unknown contract from corporations hidden behind the scenes by LLC and foreign institutions that are operating under the color of law. No judge no lawyers and no police or any one for that matter can take the second amendment by any proclamations and legislative rule or statutes codes. We the people one of the people took that case as a pioneering case, and we argue that case for all declared claimed constitutional rights and any rights violations we think based on conflict with the American citizens that we can prove by the merits and facts and the history’s enabling clauses and the supreme law article 6. Paragraph 2, US Constitution and at the state’s declarations of rights. And the last sentence of the supremacy clause.

Anything codes statutes rules proclamations orders by any none law maker enactments implements shall be in conflict will be void and null and not bound to any office under the oath and the 2nd Amendment cant be abrogated or enforced by legislative fiat so called claimed laws under trickery schemes hidden conflict of contract issues jurisdiction, so therefore the 2nd amendment can not be taken away at all. The points on the case that are established are “A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution nor the states declarations of rights in harmony as each states have a bill of rights called declarations of rights. That a flat license for a 2nd amendment tax illegal bill of attainder bill of pain and violations of article 1 sections 9 and 10 of the US Constitution, here involved restrains in advance the constitutional liberty of press and religion, and inevitably tends to suppress the exercise thereof.” That the ordinance is non- discriminatory, and that it applies also to peddlers of wares and merchandise is immaterial. Also, under the direct 2nd amendment tax direct writ of assist and bill of attainder and bill of pain. {Article 1 section 9, and 10, even at a state level declaration of rights} The liberties granted by the 2nd amendment and first amendment are in a preferred position. Since the privilege in question is guaranteed by the federal constitution and exist independently of the state’s authority even though under the agreement and contract and harmony of the states, the inquiry as to whether the state has given something for which it cannot ask a return is irrelevant. No state may convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it because the second amendment is locked in and is construed in favor of the sister states in harmony and the people, we the people. Now a lot of people will come back to me and say “Well, I’m not a part of that religious group…It does not apply to me”. You need to reach. Understand we are not talking about whether you are in the religious group or not. Forcing we the people the American citizens and invading and creating crimes against the people for equity and basic essential of life and the violate enabling clauses to protect oneself and the family and the country as a whole and the contract agreement and oath and the supremacy clause.

We have established that the constitution is a contract in writing enforceable in a court of law, and that you have a right to claim specific performance on the contract. I have clearly made it clear of my declaratory Questions on the record even though not answered. By the prosecuting attorneys, and the police officer and even the judge, well noted. I have established that it is supposed to be interpreted in my favor and my claim by my documents and verbal argument in the minute hearing and omnibus hearing, and was still given a hearing to move forward, even though I made it clear if they move forward , that I do not contract with them and told them if they move forward that they are moving forward illegally and without my permission and without given a legal lawful determination of the jurisdictions and other pointed out questions. . So, I have an honest constitutional belief, they must listen they listen but moved forward ignored deprived diminished taken away our gun natural rights given by God and inspired by men and women who have worked hard to create this strong nation at is beginning and was by the 2nd amendment from violators of true freedom, Now let us take that to the next step” Can a state arbitrarily and erroneously convert your right into a privilege and issue a license for the 2nd amendment gun rights or any additional sub paragraph to take a locked in essential gun right to bear arms for all personal and private and commercial to life liberty and justice for all and under the bill of rights and the 1st amendments and ones life liberty and happiness demand make one to have a license and a fee for it? According to law supreme law of the land that’s not in repugnant or in conflict. Example of the merits and in harmony, Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) (Supreme Court trumps everything else) Murdock is basically a religious test case. A religious group wanted to go out and preach among the public as that is their right to evangelize. Pennsylvania wanted them to have a license to solicit. The group claimed their first amendment right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the right to worship and exercise their religion unencumbered. All state in harmony can’t take away the 2nd amendment right of life liberty. The essential of protecting of American citizens who are the designated beneficiary of the iron clad contract and can’t be unencumbered and encroached and infringed and violated, therefore no state can issue an illegal conflicting law enforce license for to be able to exercise the 2nd amendment.

*May it please the court, Under the compact agreement Iron Clad Contract between government governed by Constitution and states and people We the people one of the people in harmony by the supreme law of the land and not legislative fiat to abrade abrogate infringe encroach the 2nd amendment and the right to bear arms for essentials of life and happiness. Are criminals by the taken away to free agency to choose are be armed. Special Argument developed I am going to get into an incredibly special argument…This argument has taken 18 ½ years to develop, and I want you to pay attention and share this discovery and findings. This argument is a unique concept that has been honed like a razor, to a very meticulous edge so that all judges and juris and we the people can understand what is going on. Obviously, we have established that you have a constitutional right. The Constitution is the law even the supreme court justices will tell that, if asked in a timely manner. Even in supreme case law and Shepard’s citations and Am jur prudence Constitutional law sections. And obviously we have established that I am the beneficiary we the people of the contract. And all people of the United states compact agreement is the beneficiary of the contract warranty, the 1st and 2nd amendment is in the contract, and is locked in by the 9th amendment and 10th amendment under the oath protections, and in all sister state declarations of rights as in the federal laws.

Very well done gentlemen. RIP Paul!

😢i am fairly sure that I was subscribed to your channel, but when I checked after pushing the like button, it was not showing as subscribed, so I resubscribed. I have noticed this apparently occurring on other channels I watch. Viewers should make sure they have my been taken off the notification component. Thank you for your always helpful advice & education.

So did anything happen in September?

good stuff very interesting cant wait for part 2

😱

I wonder what the early childhood of the new Mexican president looked like...

Back in the 1800s if you was released from jail they gave you your gun back you needed it for protection and you needed it to hunt food nowadays well it's the same situation how can the Constitution of the United States of America how can it be against a person who's completed their time violent or not and prove to society that they've been a productive member of society not be allowed to have the rights how can you take the rights forever it's b******* its government oversight man it's b******* if you're a nine States citizen you have a right to protect yourself

👏👏👏

21’…..the knife could also be thrown.🤔

Never ever open the door. Keep lock dead bolted. Holler thru the door, hello how many I help you? When they ask you to open the door. Reply no thank you I can hear your just fine.