US $100B Next Generation Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action | Russia Is Shocked

The idea of creating a floating runway belongs to Americans. And this is not surprising. Major battles almost always take place far from the coasts of North America, and the US has always sought to control any military conflicts. In 1910, for the first time, an airplane took off from a ship. It was a light American cruiser Birmingham, on which a wooden platform of 25x7 meters was erected. After 5 minutes the aircraft, equipped with special floats, successfully landed on the water. The following year, an American officer safely performed the landing of an airplane on the artificially created enlarged deck of the cruiser. Conducting further research, in 1915 was developed catapult, necessary for the takeoff of the aircraft from the ship.

[@justinread4381]

Please stop the click bate photos. Your channel is worth watching but the click bate makes me want to pass it over.

[@xxxkueckxxx]

Lol why? Were you disappointed?

[@krisbraga4519]

8⁸​@@xxxkueckxxx

[@user-gi3jw3ts7j]

I agree. Why have intervals now. We want to see the video and don't want to click every 3 minutes.

[@norrislaitinen5011]

​@@xxxkueckxxxwhat a stupid childish comment.

[@richierich4810]

During World War I the British navy developed the first true aircraft carrier with an unobstructed flight deck, the HMS Argus, which was built on a converted merchant-ship hull. A Japanese carrier, the Hosyo, which entered service in December 1922, was the first carrier designed as such from the keel up.

[@robertcocciardi2772]

So, click bate! Nothing shown about the gen 6 carrier! No photos, nada!🤷‍♂️

[@tonysu8860]

The Ford class is just beginning to be built and deployed and since it's going to be upgraded and serviceable for over 50 years, what else are you looking for that's "next generation?" A flying or submersible carrier perhaps? Space flight?

[@okbutthenagain.9402]

@@tonysu8860 Yet you didn't answer the comment. Just posted a meandering of words to sound intelligent.

[@ghostgardentwo-pc6ys]

We need to keep all the AIRCRAFT carriers that we have in service, IN SERVICE, a major deterrent to the opposing countries

[@arthurdiaz9184]

Gunboat diplomacy is dead in the water. Aircraft carriers are an outdated concept. WTF?

[@johnbodman4504]

You don't have any opposing countries. No country will attack the American mainland, but they will defend themselves in their own countries.

[@suzanneaufang4976]

I agree!!! It's a great deal more economic to refit AND properly maintain what we have already instead of WASTING valuable resources AND TAXPAYER MONEY on this glorified garbage that will be outdated within a year!!!!!!

[@carmenmathis201]

Grandad Hawkins worked on the air craft carrier with wooden decks in Vallejo, California.

[@robertwatson3962]

Let's support the people of this country, instead of the government defense contractors.

[@davidfisher5140]

The game changer for AA defense is laser AMS. Computer-controlled laser AMS can theoretically counter many more missiles per minute while requiring no ammunition stores.

[@rockyperez2828]

How exactly does that work, and how long does the laser beam take to disable a middle, also what is the maximum range out will it reach, if China launched a full salvo of missiles 16, how many could the laser disarm before the rest where shot down by air defense missles

[@nkemalyan]

I think it's worth considering what the carrier groups accomplish during peacetime in addition to their survivability in an all-out conflict. The US projects power simultaneously in multiple theaters with it's carrier groups. The deterrent value of this much power has to be considered in reduction of force calcuations.

[@chwparker]

It's worth considering even more the fact that this video doesn't actually discuss the new aircraft carrier.

[@garychin5321]

The Problem with Carriers; is their sheer Bulk....This makes them easily Tracked from Satellites and from Submersibles.....With the rate Missiles and Missile Cluster Technology is developing; their slow movements makes them vulnerable....With 21St Century Technology such as the DF-ZF; DF - 17 Hypersonic Munitions; their much valued: "Flat-Top": can be easily degraded as to be un-usable.......and more importantly un-land-able for Jet-aircraft after it's left the:- "Board"..... If Jet aircraft can't take-off And/Or land on a Flat-Top; Properly....It's functionality depreciates exponentially.....And; it's just another Warship..... Carriers seemed to have had their day in the 20th Century;.....Size......Really donot intimidate anymore.......Remember when the Rifle entered the Battlefield..... The Bow-and-Arrow; simply donot cut it after that...... Container Ships & Oil Tankers R Vast; but we all know how vulnerable they can be to Predatory Attacks.....Oh and one other Mathematical Factor:- The Costs & Running Costs?!!

[@rockyperez2828]

That's true when the Chinese detect a carrier they then launch a full salvo of missiles but by the time the missiles arrive where they where texted the Carrier has already moved some 350+ miles and in which direction did they go​@@garychin5321

[@glennlucas8019]

@@garychin5321 I think you where watching a different video. Your questions have been taken into account and answered.

[@suzanneaufang4976]

Really do you enjoy being as brain washed as you obviously are????

[@peterscalata]

It's amazing that they're coming up with these billions and billions of dollars worth of military equipment that the American people had no idea they was spending on

[@stevenjaygriffel5617]

Cant exactly keep the public up to speed with top-secret research.

[@shericebourne6905]

Ww3 1 aircraft carrier against 1 country is krazy😮

[@dudleydoright2706]

I believe the next generation Air craft carrier will not be floating on water, but instead, will be in space, orbiting earth.

[@jhjhuant34]

I'm looking forward for it

[@chrisshell1094]

I swear people these days couldn’t tell the truth to save their life. They have to tell lie for no freaking reason. Anyways there is absolutely nothing in this video about a 6th generation aircraft carrier. 👎

[@Shoomer1988]

"US $100B Next Generation Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action" What, the one that doesn't exist yet?

[@makale3889]

the British came up with the concept of the angled flight deck !

[@ghostgardentwo-pc6ys]

I was one of the fortunate ones stationed on the U.S.S America, CV 66, the best duty station during my inlistment in the U.S. NAVY

[@vladimirspoutine1264]

That's a lot of money to waste on what could be taken out by a single orbital hypersonic missile.

[@benjaminstubblefield2637]

Hypersonic is just a word, like Mach.a computer calculates the path, and speed, and fires to where it is projected to be when the round the defense system fired is at the same point. Turns out having to fire more quickly is the added difficulty. A Patient missile already shot 1 down in Ukraine, and Putin had the head of the company who made hypersonic sound unbeatable arrested.

[@cameronking3341]

Hypersonic is not just a word of speeds of Mach 4 that's why we are investing a lot of money into laser programs with good results so far speeds of light is faster then speed of sound that's physics

[@benjaminstubblefield2637]

It is just a made up word, just like Mach. The interception is the exact same math. The computer just has a little less time to calculate. I don’t even know what you are trying to say, but it has nothing to do with what I said.

[@dmartinhayden5722]

When it comes to role battlefield conditions. Maybe it has the meaning, maybe it doesn't.

[@dmartinhayden5722]

That was Real battlefield conditions

[@jimmylam9846]

The US can't even made Mach 8 missiles and never mind defending Chinese Mach 12 and Russian Mach 15 H M.....because the US doesn't have a up to date "Wind Tunnel"...China has JF-22 WT for Mach 30 testing !

[@johnbodman4504]

That is the most accurate American video on weapons that I have seen. Where it goes wrong, is the claim that China has no more than six hundred anti ship missiles at its disposable. Also the fact that China would even need that number. Any war with China, would involve Russia and their most modern submarines are very capable and their missiles are state of the art. This channel underestimated the number of missile hits needed to put a carrier out of action. Two hits on the deck would most likely stop any chance of launching aircraft, so in other words put it out of action for the duration of the battle. Those two missiles would do lots of damage in the lower decks, and possibly damage the lifts necessary to bring aircraft to the deck. In the era of hyposonic missiles, the carrier's escorts will be powerless to stop the missiles from getting through. The submarines of both Russia and china, would be able to lay in wait for the American fleet, with most of their systems turned off, which would make it impossible for them to be detected, until they fired their first salvo and then it would be too late. With the use of satellites, any opposing force, would know exactly where the American fleet was.

[@user-ed8ks8yw2h]

If 1 country can create a tsunami in direction of carrier what happen later ?

[@michaelgentry4427]

The Japanese, also, created an aircraft carrier in 1910

[@user-ss9zm3pw6y]

Salute you give us great information about Navy world

[@greggweber9967]

The attacker only needs one to damage or maybe stop or destroy while the defender needs to stop all. More are better.

[@billschara5667]

Yes! More are always better!

[@billotto602]

Wow. Some very interesting comments on this video.

[@mightyporky]

With all the taxes forced on us we should have the best defense in this world.

[@artwolff6659]

Um, I'd rather have affordable health care. More hospitals. More doctors.

[@lorincszabo2452]

No one gets sick of these irons. There are hypersonic destroyers with a range of 5,000 kilometers. If you want to keep a safe distance, the flight distance is long. Biden managed to switch his opponents to a higher gear and make them grow even stronger.

[@shufflnshine3097]

The Chinese don't have to sink an aircraft carrier. All that is required is to destroy the catapult/arresting systems and it's game over. That's what an aircraft carrier is about after all - launching and landing planes.

[@edwinmedina353]

We need to keep a lot's of stuff off line so they don't know what we have.

[@lincolnflemming1631]

Greatest love it

[@keithprinn720]

check the price and time to build one then get it through trials? then will it be utilised fully? massive risk vs reward

[@nobodyhome8148]

Britain had the first aircraft carrier, followed by Japan.

[@davidschalk3604]

agreed. the unbelievable photos makes me pass over this website

[@heruwahyudi6060]

Slamat pagi mejelang siang gimana suasana disana saudara & sehat slalu Demikuan atas kerjasamanya terima kasih saudara dunia damai

[@Chris05161967]

A variant of the F-18, called the EA-18G Growler was created, incorporating the technology of the EA-6B Prowler.

[@josephgagliardi5518]

Dear American Military... are ANY aircraft carriers needed in an era when manned aircraft as weapons delivery systems have been obsoleted by drones and missiles? I am a flag-waiving US Patriot and a veteran. I most Definity pro-America and very much believe in and the use of power in our Hobbsian world. But my magical future vision tells me that the new technologies will support modern military that is highly disbursed, highly automated, and near invisible. JMHO

[@Denver1976Man]

I guess the sats will have to go immediately. And they will

[@mauricedegroff5669]

Why would you spend $100 billion on an aircraft carrier that’s only one boat and you live 5 million people on the street homeless without any food how does that make any sense I thought the aircraft carrier was supposed to exist for our security, so what are we accomplishing?

[@fishbones2]

I am afraid that if the US Navy aircraft carriers go toe to toe against the Chinese military that it could be a repeat of Pearl Harbor when our once mighty battle ships were taken out with a series of low flying air attacks. The loss of a carrier could kill up to 10K of our brave Navy fighters in one sinking. I think the Navy has to do more to protect these large ships against both ballistic and cruise missile attacks. Perhaps adding directed beam weapons that can provide continuous computer controlled fire if needed to take down multiple attackers during the heat of battle. Our Space Force needs to be able to quickly target Chinese command and control satellites and disable them. This will blind the enemy. Hopefully we can also locate and take out their attack subs. We should have hypersonic tactical nukes to take out their shore batteries. or something similar. EMP bombs exploded 400 miles over China would also devastate their electrical infrastructure. The US needs to go all out against China or Russia if attacked.

[@andrewells7441]

You sir should put down the pipe! do you think all 11 carrier battle groups will just be chilling in some port waiting on an attack? EMP really? What will the Navy be doing once an EMP is launched, how old are you like 13? Space Force will certainly use means more than lasers to destroy the enemy. You tell me what vehicle are today's astronauts training on and using? Man if war breaks out China and the rest of the world will be introduced to super-secret aircraft. I think that we have systems so high-tech that they do not require booster rockets at all to leave lower orbit.

[@randywatkins3306]

My only question is ? Is our OCEAN BIG ENOUGH TOO FLOAT THAT ( THING ) ?

[@keithhenderson5701]

Good job very well done I used to be a welder in the shipyard in Newport News Virginia and I helped build the Carl Vincent

[@ronstorey6012]

I'm retired Navy and I'm tired of this type of reporting using concept drawing of futuristic drawings to highlight whatever ship there reporting on

[@rhyno8644]

Soo instead of the opposition targeting the entire fleet is the vessel fast enough to simply not be targeted itself?

[@user-hy8hq1fq9b]

Let's just show the world what we have.

[@carlbergh3952]

That’s the point to let our enemies know what the United States has to take care of business when needed and to let them know what their up against!

[@1mw4tch1ng]

I support all these expenditures on our military to protect the USA and other countries from tyrant countries. As stated highly technical weapons do not create wars but prevent them.

[@bryanchristy5072]

Why would you have all of that posted where anyone can look it up? Why would something like this not be classified and kept quiet?

[@janicefletcher3588]

Cool

[@michaelcschmitt]

Let talk about the current state of American finances. We are broke.

[@rickeyburke2596]

Why is all this information being released? Loose Lips, Sink Ships.

[@W5BW]

6 Carriers should remain active and 4 Reserve 2 on the west coast and 2 on the east coast! 1 mothballed!

[@tonysu8860]

Although facts and data in this video seem OK at first glance, The analysis is probably completely wrong. Regarding number of US carrier groups, I don't know that there's any talk about changing the number. Maybe this video is mixing up the US military deployment strategy to deploy 1/3 of total number actively, 1/3 in regular maintenance and 1/3 in deep maintenance and upgrades. That matches this video's number of 4 carrier groups deployed and that's happening today. If a hot conflict with a near peer like Russia or China were to occur, not only would all the carrier groups scattered around the world redeploy to the hot spot but the carrier groups in regular maintenance might be able to deploy prematurely within a month or so. That's an impressive number of carrier force that can be brought to bear if necessary. Also, the suggested idea of swarming a single carrier (much less several) is probably theoretical but unachievable. The strategy assumes that the target would be within easy range of those weapons but unless the US is caught by surprise I'd expect that easy targets like carriers would be far out of easy range at the first sign of impending hostilities. Remember that because of US aerial refueling capabilities as well as several technological advantages, US forces have a far longer reach than China's aircraft and ships. And, as noted in this video, the really long range missiles Russia and China have are expensive and complicated. They'd also have to be very large, at least the size of small fighter aircraft and they'd have to traverse a very long way running a gauntlet of USN defenses which might include laser weapons soon. Submarines might have a better chance attacking a carrier group, but US technology is pretty good here, too. Although Russia or China might be able to get off a lucky shot, US defenses are still formidable. Bottom line is that any country should know that attacking a US carrier is like attacking the US directly and the kid gloves come off. If a carrier is attacked, successful or not it would likely trigger a full retaliation just short of nuclear weapons. That country would see the full capability of US combined forces of air force and navy and I don't know that even a Putin or Xi would want to find how that turns out.

[@NixsonJr]

All this chest thumping is part of the strategy,ain't it.

[@kristelvidhi5038]

The new Big E's get bigger and bigger.

[@billschara5667]

"Big E" is specifically Enterprise

[@user-rq7wd9hk4m]

Everyone has anti ship weapons chine really does

[@Blaxjax21]

But not all groups are at sea at the same time, so cost less.

[@Davey-TheDJ]

Build more that r tougher

[@chrissmith6157]

I highly doubt the usa is behing anyone when it comes to tech. Our black projects alone is more then a lot of countries.

[@mauerbach58844]

Hi Chris Let’s talk black budgets ! Even during the Cold War Russia has been working behind the scenes with USA on space projects till this day. My understanding is in recent years so is China. So very doubtful you would see much of what the three countries have combined in conventional conflict. I think sadly

[@rgreen2968]

How we paying for all this?

[@MRsolidcolor]

our navy slows the enemy down while the army slowly gets steam. army takes months to get moving why the navy hits first..

[@HeeroYuy911]

Erm the idea of a floating airstrip was an English idea and the first true aircraft carrier in the world was HMS Argus during WW1. Like really get your facts checked. Before that many country's tried to have some form of aircraft launch's from ships normally the back of Battleships of Cruisers with varying success on tiny platforms or with a rail lunching system.

[@rcsontag]

What in the world does a comparison with hospitals have to do with aircraft carrier groups?

[@LaPisceanLiberty]

What about the USA's hypersonic quaterhorse ?

[@jameskipp66]

The reason you chose to compare cost of a Carrier Strike Group [CSG] v Hospital ... wasn't by happenstance. It was a deliberate comparison Which just esposes a lack of general knowledge of who, what, when, where, how and why a hospital is built. 1. Even if the Feds could save the cost of CSG dail ops ... it couldnt just go "lets divert those funds and build a hospital" Unless its a VA or otger military hospital, that is left up to the individual states. Specifically an agency at the state, who approves and regulates hospitals, including how many hospitals per region, and how many beds each of those hospitals contain. A hospital, is generally built by private corporations, and if they want to add new beds to one of their hospitals, they must first get approval from said state agency. So, don't get people riled up over a CSG instead of a hospital.

[@Benoit-Pierre]

What's the point of listing numbers ? Reading decimals of pi would not be more boring.

[@larryburling5621]

we need more aircraft carriers and spend to the military for higher tech weapons sense we are at world war 3 and yes we are at war in world war 3 weather you like it or not so get the money to the military right away lets get building.

[@superdivemaster]

Stop the War Machine !!! Let's rebuild Detroit, let's rebuild Allentown !!! Let's improve our infrastructures !!!

[@Redraven2967]

Maybe when the people that live in the cities start taking care of their own cities they can come to the nation for some assistance. Until then, not interested.

[@billschara5667]

For that, you need Trump back in the White House!!

[@superdivemaster]

@@billschara5667 You mean like the "Wall" ??? You're crack'in me up !!!

[@vincentknight9873]

Who said stupid wouldn't push the button for a nuclear war oh, he's already said he would

[@christepherbatts3446]

There is nothing cutting edge about it, other than its cost.... We , and others already have employed checkmates tech ; for many many years now.... Ussr are simply placing multiple already much Proven tech from around the world ...besides the The H.E.M.P weaponry; ussr truly is still way behind....hey puter remember subs.... You're going to need those also..not just simply taking Chinese junk, and build Soviet looking craft from them.... We STILL deploy much better flexible tech, always will

[@frankiebpr]

Video content doesn’t correlate with title announcement.

[@JT-fr4zq]

I thought they retired the Viking a while back. I wish they hadn’t tho

[@billschara5667]

No mention of lasers?? I think this video is out of date. The video doesn't take into account classified US missile defense. So it is misleading.

[@ToddAdams1234]

I think that it’s fine to mothball 1/2 of the carrier groups IF it were done during a less trying time. Right now, maybe 3 BUT we need to be ready to call them back at the drop of a card!

[@jamesfarley4644]

How high is it feet please.

[@Demun1649]

So, the US is the undisputed leader of carriers over the past 100 years? OK, fool yourself if you want to. BUT, who invented the angled flight deck? Which two countries built the first two classic layout carriers, flat deck, island on the port side, funnels directing smoke and steam away from the flight deck, and two lifts, one forrard and one aft? The modern steam catapult was a British invention. The use of steam to launch aircraft was suggested by Commander Colin C. Mitchell RNVR, and trials on HMS Perseus, flown by pilots such as Eric "Winkle" Brown, from 1950 showed its effectiveness. Navies introduced steam catapults, capable of launching the heavier jet fighters, in the mid-1950s. The first OLS was the mirror landing aid, one of several British inventions made after the Second World War, revolutionising the design of aircraft carriers. The Mirror Landing Aid was invented by Nicholas Goodhart. It was tested on the carriers HMS Illustrious and HMS Indomitable before being introduced on British carriers in 1954 and on US carriers in 1955. You were GIVEN radar by the British, you were GIVEN the Jet Engine by the British. SO, EXACTLY, what did you ACTUALLY INVENT? No wonder the average US citizen is so thick, you tell them lies all the time.

[@randallbenson9475]

I wish this video would tell the truth about CVN 78. It does not have 5 Gen aircraft as of yet. My son serves aboard this aircraft carrier. They're underway at the moment with only F18 Super Hornets and supporting aircrafts. You could look at videos of them coming in to Norway and Greece. You'll see only F18s fighters.....no 5th gen aircrafts. Just thought I'd share.

[@billschara5667]

You don't have any idea what the carrier's exact aircraft compliment is, and if your son tells you, he'll be arrested

[@christepherbatts3446]

Excellent!

[@randallbenson9475]

You can see from the video of them coming into Norway....all planes are on deck. No F35s. Even the news crew that was on the ship talking with the Captain watching the exercises....no F35. Plus, I believe my son at what he says. If there was something that he couldn't tell me, he would say that it's classified information. No need for an arrest.

[@diegoflores9237]

Next you'll use the death star in your thumbnails

[@keithkruse2595]

Are the rumors about TR-3B Black Mantis true?

[@PJ-hn4cg]

So where's the ship on the cover of this video ?!

[@charharn7011]

Well at this point the paper army of the Russian's is not a threat to anyone unless maybe a third world or unarmed opponent. As Ukraine was at the beginning of hostilities.

[@powerhausstudiosgkfotograp3256]

Russia is not shocked! There carriers are far more advanced compared to 30 yrs old US technology

[@michaelkeating8870]

Hundred BILLION ? Did you flunk math??

[@greggweber9967]

How far can a submarine Quietly go in the time it takes an enemy to bar the door?

[@keithkruse2595]

That is the question..

[@NigelHatcherN]

It should already be there.

[@williamadams4843]

Umm nothing about a new carrier

[@robgraybeal8089]

Thank God that the military doesn't listen to most of the comments here from people that have obviously never served in the military because we would be learning Chinese!

[@andrekuh3956]

I THOUGHT THE GERARLD FORD CARRIER COSTS ABOUT $ 18000000 ?

[@jerryengstrom2293]

Forgot to add lazers

[@user-cy7cs7ec6f]

Why did you use meters and then use miles?

[@georgen9755]

to cover large area

[@AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys]

Slip shit in drive!!! Roa Aotearoa nui.

[@zorbakaput8537]

"The idea of creating a floating runway belongs to Americans." False statement but then the facts have never stopped a YT channel on the net. The Pomms had aircraft taking off from carrier ships in WW1 (HMS Argus) and the Japanese were second the Americans were third!

[@johnbodman4504]

Sounds about right.

[@robertbeagan2937]

Please stop using meters to determine length and width stop meters all together I

[@NigelHatcherN]

The Brits were the first to do aircraft carriers.

[@craigharrison5406]

Americans invented flight so...

[@NigelHatcherN]

@@craigharrison5406 Yes they did, powered flight, but brits put the first plane on a ship. I don't know about landing. However since then aircraft carriers are american.

[@davidjarvie9546]

As an island its essential to take the battle to land away from the homelands, 🇬🇧👍

[@lancehagen2414]

The first aircraft carrier was a barge in the United States that launched a hot air balloon during the civil war. I believe it may have landed back on it but I have no idea 🤣

[@NigelHatcherN]

@@lancehagen2414 I am amazed and impressed. Talk about ahead of time!

[@user-yp9fb1jb6m]

One hypersonic missile will destroy it. One million dollar missile destroys a $100 B ship rendering it obsolete.

[@manmoth4]

Hypersonic missiles are actually easier to shoot down than cruise missiles because they follow a ballistic trajectory, they're a small upgrade on standard ballistic missiles and not as big a deal as Russian shills think it is. Ukraine regularly shoots down hypersonic missiles

[@billschara5667]

Don't let your lack of classified information kick you in the ass!

[@bernardkey4394]

Stop it Please. You don't know.

[@williamflouro6021]

Good video, but the title has nothing to do with it... Thumbs down.

[@MichealAnthonyGennaro]

A private company made this video. Not AMERICA. So please stop insulting my country.

[@renripari5514]

THERE ARE MORE RICH PEOPLE AROUND TODAY SO THERE VOICES ARE HEARD ! MANY YEARS AGO MUCH LESS RICH PEOPLE SO PEOPLE DID WHAT THEY WERE TOLD AND THE MANY TAX PAYER'S PAYED FOR DEFENCE ! IM TRYING TO KEEP IT VERY BREAF . KIND REGARDS .

[@billschara5667]

You need more research, don't lie, don't omit obvious facts, don't show misleading images with the discussion.

[@louisdifrancesco1474]

Imagine connecting watertight cargo containers together to form 200ft wide roadways/railways with wind/solar generation to create electrified airplane/train/pipeline(gas, oil, water...) hydroponic agriculture/aquaculture bases with housing. These electrified roadways could replace/reduce oil using ships/airplanes and increase usable surface area for food & habitate across all oceans. Electroplating non-rusting containers from toxic waste dump metal allowing easier recovery of the gold.

[@user-rq7wd9hk4m]

They r sitting ducks

[@keithd5181]

ANTI is pronounced ANTEE.

[@gregvoight8616]

Russian missiles will burned this expensive crap. Anytime and anywhere 😢😮😊

[@Ozzywozzy]

The USS America sank from explosives planted in specific places because they just couldn't sink it. Realistically, it survived.

[@royrice8021]

Useless in a nuclear war…..Next……..