Use Bloom's to Think Critically

Boom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning levels. The cognitive domains include: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating and Creating. Understanding how we process information, and what strategies may help us to integrate new knowledge, can make learning more efficient!
For more information visit: www.cas.lsu.edu
_______________
Subscribe for more studying strategies and resources: kzbin.info_...
Find tutoring, free help with homework, and test preparation: lsu.edu/cas
Check out LSU Supplemental Instruction: www.lsu.edu/students/cas/abou...
Like us on Facebook: LSUCAS?fref=...
Follow us on Twitter: / lsu_cas
For More Information, visit our website: lsu.edu/cas

[@canvaswiggle]

Thank you for letting us know this concept with such simplicity.

[@explorewithCK]

the Bloom taxonomy was explained very well in this video

[@anamikalahiri2031]

We want this type progam

[@sridharbalan8918]

Simple , clear and effective explanation.

[@stephengoh5456]

Fantastic! Love it! Thank you.

[@karishmabatra3854]

Thank u for this video. Thank u so much for explaining it so easily. This video helped me a lot :)

[@SJ-hn2hu]

Thank you so much! It is so well and easily explained.

[@edigarmafi8483]

this vide was great it reLly simplified things for me tnanks heaps :)

[@pligmoom]

Amazing. Thank you!

[@abdallahyussif3289]

Very helpful and straight forward explanation. It would have been better if the Dr. had explained the old version of the Bloom's Taxonomy before moving to talk about the new Bloom's digital taxonomy.

[@animeworld1901]

Great explanation!! Thank u

[@alphues2005]

Well said!

[@smartlearning9500]

​@t This is a very good article on Bloom's taxonomy. It has 30 examples of how to craft learning objectives using this methodology and also contains 180 plus verbs related to Bloom's taxonomy.

[@CriticallyGnart]

Absolutely!

[@johntindell9591]

Thank you very much

[@kirkjonesfart]

Superb

[@teguhgumilar6868]

Can you also explain about Bloom, digital taxonomy?

[@kritikasaraf4178]

Totally agree about studying it with someone cause you should try to know the material very well that you'd be able to teach it.

[@taraadams6664]

I teach high school students how to be educators in our onsite Reggio Inspired prek laboratory school. I would push back on this video...you can operate within any of the Bloom's stages at any time...even as a preschool student. To say that you hit a certain level once you get to college is not accurate. To fair, the "school system" a person is in may not provide opportunities to work and learn at various levels, but that doesn't mean that a person cannot.

[@symeducationalconsulting5684]

You're absolutely right about that. In our book, Teach Students How to Learn, I make the point you just made. However, I find this way of explaining it very effective for students who often try to apply information before they've understood it. When Bloom and his colleagues developed this at the University of Chicago they did not mean it to be hierarchical. BUT, again, I find that this way is most likely to get students to understand why they may be struggling.

[@marvelouss719]

You cannot apply, analyze or evaluate anything if you don't have a foundation. In your world maybe you can get to applying and analyzing without knowing anything, but NOT in mine.

[@taraadams6664]

I am seeking clarification. Tell me more as I would love to learn from you about your occupation. What “world” do you work in? What is your career that would require a more stricter linear model?@marvelous719

[@marvelouss719]

@@taraadams6664 I don't think you understand my comment. The professor explained Bloom's Taxonomy from the bottom to the top. A strong house begins with a strong foundation. No one can perform adequately at the top of BT without some foundational knowledge. Unless you were a student of Dr. Bloom or spoke directly with him , you do not know what his intentions were. Obviously, he thought learning was a science just like any other sciences. The key is not to stay on any level and I did not hear the professor advocating staying on any level.

[@taraadams6664]

@marvelouss719 thank you for your reply, this helps clear things up and I really appreciate you having a conversation with me. I was not trying to imply that Bloom’s says to stay at a level or that you don’t need a foundation to reach a mastery status. What I am implying is that for true learning to occur you must be able to operate somewhat (and admittedly with partial efficiency) at many levels. Most scientists conducting experiments will “analyze” ongoing developments as they “create” new variables as they go. A lot of our best scientific discoveries had scientists analyzing before an “understanding” occurred. An early ed we see preschool aged children operate this same way as they explore the world. If they waited to “understand” prior to evaluating they might never actually understand. Most early learners start with evaluating and analyzing, actually. Think about a kid brushing their teeth for the first time as toddlers. They have adults to remember for them and though they can be told about the importance of brushing their teeth, they don’t have an actual understanding of the consequences of not brushing. But they will analyze how much toothpaste they need and evaluate the flavors they like and dislike. When letters are introduced you are going to get further with a child when you have him build an “a” out of play dough. This creation of the letter “a” will come long before the understanding of what an “a” is - what sound it makes, what a “letter” is, or how it works with other sounds. The child will build first to remember later. I would also say as an educator who teaches multiple ages of students sometimes it’s the exploration within the act of creating a product that real understanding and long term memory click. I agree with you about high degrees of mastery and expertise at an adult level - you absolutely need foundations. But, in teaching children we need to be aware of that so much is happening at once. I think Blooms is a great model for my secondary students learning history and algebra, but we have to broaden our own understanding when it comes to the neuroscience of early education.

[@omnibrain8]

You did not talk about synthesis but added creating level? I know of knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation .Thank you.

[@kinarast]

There are different versions. And the one that she talked about was the recent one

[@aletagotekote8006]

great

[@tokunboaiyegboyin3439]

Great

[@naughtyskywalker9292]

I am listening to this with Sicario movie trailer music playing in the background. My soul is confused.

[@MrBoudreaux1976]

Oh wow! You made it to the Soul Confusion Level! Bloom believed that anyone reaching S.C.L. would be so rare and special he decided not to put it into his taxonomy. Bloom was unaware of the internet when he created his taxonomy and the subsequent explosion of soul confusion which can now be split into six to twelve levels of its own. Pretty much everyone living right now is an S.C.L.1

[@Maliceah]

I love how the camera man got caught in the shot. :)

[@solwethusolwethu5935]

Why can't we First Analyze the information Before we Implement it?

[@ZorbaPress]

Too many critics boast themselves as greater than the original content's creator.

[@taraadams6664]

People who post content about educational theory expect some discussion and discourse about their theory and understanding. It bridges understanding and promotes deeper thought.

[@ZorbaPress]

I must have been in tremendous rush when I posted my comment,. I should have added: Bloom's Taxonomy is an antidote for the problem of critics who claim to know more than creators.

[@LiudasBelickas]

Title is misleading - information here is just a summary of what the concept is. It does not show how to utilize it to think Critically :/

[@user-lt9et8iv7p]

@TheMoon could you please explain to me in the different way? I don't get what you mean.

[@marvelouss719]

I hope you are NOT in education because your comment does NOT match up with anything the professor said. You are just being critical because she is black. You were probably thought the brain is NOT a muscle and intelligence is RACE defined.

[@josiahhook1535]

noice

[@hg-sx4jq]

.

[@RyanVish]

this helped me zero