☀ इस मकरसक्रांति संस्कृत भाषा सीख कर अपनी आध्यात्मिक यात्रा प्रारम्भ करें। Use Coupon Code "MAKAR25" to avail 25% discount on all Shikshanam course! 🕉 🚨Coupons are Limited. Enroll Today! Download Shikshanam App: bit.ly/3LehPc5 Or visit the website: www.hyperquest.in/courses
@cutefeelings86110 ай бұрын
Meri apse binti hay ki kripaya ispe ek video banaye ki vailmiki ramayana me unke khadyavyas ko leke keya likha gaya hay or Raja dasarath ki shikar ke waje se pane wala shrap ki bare me vi keipiya khulasha ki jiye😊🙏jay shree Krishna
@Sam-gq5xc10 ай бұрын
Karpurgauram ka arth Kya h apne Sanskrit teacher se puchhkar batao.
@brainbooster572010 ай бұрын
Please make a video on the battle of ten kings(dasrajana yudhh)and mittani inscription of Syria
@RCThakur-i5j10 ай бұрын
bhai p lease iss aak question hai mera ispe video jarur lana kya ramsetu sahi mai tha?
@dumplings-yukoo10 ай бұрын
Plz bhagwan ram par jo meat or wine khane ka baat or shikar k bare mein likha hein uske upar bhi video banayiye 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️
@naveenprakash9010 ай бұрын
कई बार कुछ प्रश्नों का उत्तर हमारे पास नही होता पर आप जो भी ज्ञान दे रहे है उससे कई प्रश्नों के उत्तर मिल रहे है । श्री हरि।।।
@robohast10 ай бұрын
विशाल जी आपका प्रयास सराहनीय है। हिन्दू धर्म (ग्रन्थ) इतना बृहद है कि कोइ व्यक्ति विशेष इसका गहन अध्ययन करके सटीक निष्कर्ष दे पाए यह सर्वथा झूठ होगा। क्योंकि इनके अध्ययन करना एक प्रकार से असंभव है। इसलिए कोई इनके बारे में तर्क नहीं दे सकता। आपका प्रयास सराहनीय है। मै भी अपने इन ग्रंथों का ज्ञान पाना चाहता हूं परन्तु उम्र और गृहस्थ के जंजाल से समय और सम्पत्ति के अभाव के कारण अनभिज्ञ रहता हूं। आपको अनेकों धन्यवाद जो ऐसे कार्यक्रम लाने के लिए।
@AnjuSingh-ov2qr10 ай бұрын
Your channel deserves more and more views and followers you are doing great Job by creating awareness about our culture 😊
@riteshkumarprajapati749810 ай бұрын
बालकांड में एक श्लोक है जिसमें बताया गया है कि रामायण में उत्तर कांड सहित छह कांड हैं। इस श्लोक में उत्तरकाण्ड का अलग से उल्लेख क्यों है? रामायण में सात कांड हैं ऐसा क्यों नहीं कहा ? इससे लगता है कि उत्तरकांड बाद में जोड़ा गया है और इसको उचित बताने के लिए बालकांड में भी मिलावट की गई है।
@agniswar310 ай бұрын
ये भि तो हो सकता है कि इस श्लोक का अर्थ है कि उत्तराकांड को पढ़ना आवश्यक नहि हे।
@K.S_2008710 ай бұрын
हा भाई मिलावट ही की गई है ताकि लोगो को सच लगे की उत्तर काण्ड सच ही वरना ये अलग से नही लिखा होता उत्तर काण्ड सहित छह काण्ड हे समझ सकते हो की ये बादमें मिलाया है।
@kafir-e-aazam849910 ай бұрын
उत्तरकांड रामायण का अभिन्न हिस्सा है ।।
@Chao_Dip10 ай бұрын
@@kafir-e-aazam8499aata mila?
@cutefeelings86110 ай бұрын
But in Mahabharata Padma puran usme uttarkand ki vag mention hota hay or ravan ka character vi usi me explained hay zada Thora doubt rahe hi jata hay....or uttarkand alag se mentioned Hay or shkola number 24000 and 500 swarga kaha jata hay original me vi ayese hi explained hay uski lekhni ko katke ye shloka number or sarga number change Nehi Kiya ja sakta hay na
@omnarayanchauhan78610 ай бұрын
सर आपके पास ज्ञान तो बहुत बढ़िया है और।कंटेंट में भी दम ह परंतु आपके चेंनल का नाम ऐसा है कि कोई आसानी से उस तक नही पहुच सकता इसके लिए मेरा आपसे निवेदन है कि आप आपके चेंनल का नाम चेंज कर के देखिये आपको 10 मिलियन से ज्यादा व्यू ओर सब्सक्राइबर मिलेंगे इससे आपके फैन को काफी खुशी होगी उसमे एक मे भी हु
@adityapandey6249 ай бұрын
SatyaVachan
@pratikthakur718910 ай бұрын
Thank you for bringing this videos on uttarkand bhai... Jai Shree Ram... ❤❤
@omprakashverma527110 ай бұрын
उत्तर काण्ड में कुछ चीजे बाद में जोड़ी गई है 1. यदि किसी शुद्र के तापस्य से किसी ब्राह्मण का पुत्र मर जाता है तो फिर वाल्मीकि जी के साधना से भी तो किसी की मृत्यु होनी चाहिए। 2. वाल्मीकि रामायण के युद्ध कांड में अंत में स्पष्ट लिखा हु है इस प्रकार राम और राम के पुत्रो ने हजारे वर्ष राज्य किया। और यह बताता है रामायण यही पर समाप्त हो गई।
@lalitasharma668710 ай бұрын
Apne shi kha
@VipinChauhan24710 ай бұрын
Ved padhne se
@devashishmajmundar98337 ай бұрын
महर्षि वाल्मीकि शूद्र नही थे वरन महर्षि प्रचेता के पुत्र थे और आध्यात्मिक पठन पाठन उनका वंशगत कार्य था ।
@Utkala_Chandra3 ай бұрын
@@devashishmajmundar9833😂😂 bramhano ka hatya kon karta tha??? Thoda padha karo shastra
@reemasharma6128Ай бұрын
Ram ji ne sita ji ke sath 31 hazar se jada years tak rajya kiya ayodhya mein or baad mein rajya ko apne bhaiyo ke sabhi bachoo mein dediya tha.....sita ji ka Puna nirvasan nahi hua....kabhi tyaag nahi hua tha....
@rattantata110 ай бұрын
Sanskrit words has different meanings as per situations. True Ram Bhadrachary Ji told that Sri Ram Ji never leave Sita Mata. I have seen in a video.. Ye Pani ke kavi koi sapna dekha aur bad me Ramayana me Joda gya. I'm extremely thankful to u to search the truth in this Kaliyug.👌Job Sir 🙏🙏🙏
@shivendusuryavanshi44110 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing valuable information on Uttar Kand of Ramayan. I just love your research work on Hinduism. Jai Shri Ram 🙏
@avikatyagi289410 ай бұрын
अगली दोनों वीडियो का बेसब्री से इंतजार रहेगा भाई ,क्योकि ऐसे प्रश्न मेरे मन मे भी है😇जय महाकाल🙏🌳🌳
@enthusiast.h510 ай бұрын
Kya aap ujjain se hai ?
@avikatyagi289410 ай бұрын
जी नही। किन्तु क्या महाकाल जी पर केवल उज्जैन वालो का ही अधिकार है?😇🌳
@enthusiast.h510 ай бұрын
@@avikatyagi2894 जी नहीं, उन पर श्रद्धा रखने वाले हर भक्त का हो सकता है। किंतु आपको ऐसा क्यों लग रहा है?
@avikatyagi289410 ай бұрын
@@enthusiast.h5 पहले आप कहिए आपको क्यो लगा कि मैं उज्जैन से हूं?🌳
@enthusiast.h510 ай бұрын
@@avikatyagi2894 जय महाकाल देखकर..आधिकांश उज्जैनवासी वार्तालाप की शुरूवात में यह बोलते है। अब आप बताइए आपको ऐसा क्यों लगता है?
@SanatanYatraASHU10 ай бұрын
पूज्यनीय तुलसी पीठ के जगद्गुरु श्री श्री रामभद्राचर्य महाराज जी भी इस कांड को बाद में जोड़ा गया बताते हैं पुज्य रामानन्द सागरजी ने भी कहा था कि इस कांड को बनाना अच्छा नहीं है. इसलिए उत्तरकांड की शूटिंग बाद में हुई
@KhumeshChaudhari-x9l10 ай бұрын
वह शुटिंग भी राजीव गांधी सरकार द्वारा निर्मित दबाव के कारण किया गया था
@SanatanYatraASHU10 ай бұрын
@@KhumeshChaudhari-x9l बिल्कुल सही कहा आपने
@NaveenSharma-gq9qj10 ай бұрын
@@SanatanYatraASHU अच्छा क्या बात करते हो कुछ आता जाता हैं या नहीं आपको दिक्कत क्या उत्तरकांड से बताओं एक कारण बताओं कोई भी ................(पर याद रहे आगे पिछे कि बात पढ़ कर बतानो )
@yogendramohan280910 ай бұрын
मान्यवर ,हिन्दू सनातनी समाज आपका सदैवआभारी रहेगा ,सनातन और शास्त्रों के बिरोधियो के प्रपंच होते रहे हैं ।।
@secularsayan10 ай бұрын
Sita Mata KI Tayag and Sambhu ka badh ek dam authentic and moral hain. Kyu? is ka answer Hyper Quest bhaiya jarur deghe. So Don't worry and don't shame about our history. 🌹🌹
@akad_0210 ай бұрын
0:57 start 8:36 sponsor start 9:34 sponsor end
@Famousincomment10 ай бұрын
Isme galat kya hai
@snehasingh460610 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम 🙏
@neetusonipoonamsoni321910 ай бұрын
Aapke adhyayan gyan chmta vilkchan h aapke shodh ur pryas se hm bhartiy apni sankriti ke shi tatvo ko smjh pate h itne gahen gyan ur shodh ke liye aapka bhut aabhar agli dono vidios ka intjar rhega 🙏🚩jy sri ram
@sab-clear-karo10 ай бұрын
वाल्मीकि जी ने उत्तर कांड लिखा है, मानस में भी तुलसी दास जी ने उत्तर कांड लिखा है, और मुझे ऐसी कोई कथा नहीं लगी कि जो मिलावटी हो, हम जब तक ज्ञान नहीं रखते और किसी के सवाल का जवाब नहीं दे पाते तो हम अपने बचाव में सीधा बोल देते हैं कि ये चीज मिलावटी है, जब कि हमें अपने ग्रंथो का अध्ययन करना चाहिए, 1 -2 चीजे बताऊं तो शम्भुक वध इसलिए किया गया कि शम्भूक कोई अच्छी पूजा या यज्ञ नहीं कर रहा था जबकि वो एक चण्ड पूजा कर रहा था जो अनुचित है और उसने बलि के लिए 3 अलग अलग जान भी ली थीं, और ऐसे व्यक्ति का वध कहीं से अनुचित नहीं है, बस दिक्कत कुछ लोगों को है कि इससे उनकी राजनीति में दम पड़ जाता है , क्योंकि शंभुक शुद्र लिखा हुआ है बस इसलिए! नहीं तो रामायण में 2 वध पहले भी हुए हैं : 1 - बाली का 2 - मेघनाद का ( इसका तो यज्ञ करते हुए ही किया था) {इसपे किसी को कोई आपत्ती नहीं आती बस वहां (शंभुक के लिए) शुद्र लिखा है तो बस लग गए राजनीति चमकाने} दूसरा सीता मैया का त्याग : तो कुछ और ग्रंथो को पढ़ने के बाद पता लगता है कि ये त्याग नहीं था, सीता माता गर्भवती थी तो उन्हें राजा जनक के क्षेत्र में (मतलब मायके) भेजा गया था जो परंपरा के तरह था लेकिन राजा जनक वेद ज्ञाता थे तो उन्हें वो धर्म संगत नहीं लगा इसीलिए राजा जनक ने जानकी को अपने क्षेत्र में तो रखा लेकिन महल में नहीं {यही माता का भी मत था वो खुद भी महल में नही रहना चाहती थीं} तो इसलिए वाल्मीकि आश्रम में रहीं चूंकि वाल्मीकि एक देवऋषि थे इसलिए । फिर उसके बाद जो होना था वो हुआ भी, माता पृथ्वी से आई थी वो वहां चली गई, और प्रभु अपने लोक ( बाकी लोगों का उद्धार हो गया)।
@prasenjitgkpm45899 ай бұрын
अगर बाल्मीकि जी उत्तर कांड में सब कुछ सत्य लिखा है तो आप कैसे कह सकते है कि संबूक हत्या इस लिए किया गया क्योंकि वो चंड पूजा कर रहा था आपके इस क्या उस समय कि लिखित किताब या ग्रंथ में ये प्रसंग लिखा है जिसे आप बता रहे हैं अतः मैं आपके इस कथन को सत्य नहीं मानता क्योंकि मनुस्मृति के अनुसार शूद्रों को पूजा पाठ तथा विद्या आदि सीखने हेतु अपराध था जिसमें कठोर डंड का प्रवधान था जिसके कारण संबूक हत्या हुआ आप अपना प्रमाण अधारित तर्क दे सकते है
@adityaguru665410 ай бұрын
ग्रंथों को समझना इतना आसान होता तो आज हर कोई आचार्य होता, ये भगवान की लीला है, और इसके पीछे कई सारे कारण हैं जो पुराणों में वर्णित हैं।
@shivbhansingh429910 ай бұрын
उत्तर के तीन अर्थ प्रमुख हैं- 1-दिशा , 2- समाधान व 3-पश्चात
@CBS161110 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम🙏 जय सीता माता🙏 जय लक्ष्मण भगवान🙏 जय श्री हनुमान🙏 जय भरत महाराज🙏 जय शत्रुघ्न महाराज🙏
@arponpaul210010 ай бұрын
I really appreciate you giving an English title to this video. I come from a different country. I understand Hindi but am unable to read it correctly. Therefore thanks for using English.
@xenonezio518810 ай бұрын
Where are you from?
@mamtawadhwa-ez8es10 ай бұрын
U can take help with translator or we all support you that he can put English titles
@arponpaul210010 ай бұрын
@@xenonezio5188Bangladesh
@siddharthababoo36279 ай бұрын
Apka way of elaboration is very Nice. App Hindu ke lie ek di. icon ho jaenge. Bahat Bahat Sundar. Bhagaban Apko apka jiban Mai bahat tarakki lae or ashirvad de 🎉🎉
@MahirGhadse10 ай бұрын
Jai Shri Ram 🙏🚩
@santoshjha92010 ай бұрын
फल श्रुति का उदाहरण परवर्ती ग्रंथो से तुलना करके व्याख्या करना है किंचित अनुचित है। तात्कालिक संदर्भ अच्छे होंगे। धार्मिक ग्रंथों पर परिचर्चा का दौर और विवेक वर्तमान काल का। पहले हमे उन आग्रह से मुक्त होने होंगे जो मैकाले गलत शिक्षा पद्धति ने पिरोया। आपके कार्य अति सराहनीय है।🙏
Great, Superb & Memorable Win of Sanatan People for BJP in 2024 to form the Raam.Rajya of Vedic Sanatani Hindu Culture ambitioned by our holy books…”Ramayana” & “Geeta” for Unique Hindu.RaShtr of universal Love, Peace, Progress & Humanity. वैदिक.सनातनी.संस्कृति की रक्षा के लिए और संस्कृत भाषा क धर्म.ग्रंथ जैसे... वेद, पुराण, उपनिषद, गीता, रामायण, महाभारत के, बाल्यावस्था से, उचित अध्ययन के लिए, पूरे देश के पाठ्यक्रमों में "दैवीय…संस्कृत.भाषा" को…2nd language, क्षेत्रीय राज्य भाषा को…1st language, हिंदी भाषा को ..3rd language & English भाषा को ..4th language का सम्मान मिलना चाहिए, जो देश के सभी क्षेत्रीय सनातनियों को भी मान्य होगी।
@AbcdAbcd-ey7vb10 ай бұрын
सत्य सनातन 🙏सत्यमेव जयते🙏 जय श्री राम🙏🚩
@MCTVShyama.1Mview10 ай бұрын
You will make history very nice bro and thanks to take initiative to wake up all sanatani..🎉🎉🎉🚩🚩
@divyanshyadav128110 ай бұрын
जय जय श्री राम
@somanathdash315310 ай бұрын
Jay Siyaram 🚩🧡🙏🏻🌸 Jay Hanuman 🚩🧡🙏🏻🌸
@shyamkantverma12627 ай бұрын
Vishal ji NAMAN 🙏 for a very Rational Analysis. Somehow story of Shambhuk Vadh is difficult to digest if it is true .
@souravbanerjee193510 ай бұрын
Brother you are doing a great job This is why education is important Thanks
@Tattvamasii-b4q10 ай бұрын
Please do a podcast with Swami Sarvapriyananda ji....
@truth210 ай бұрын
Critical Edition Of Valmiki Ramayana Most Authentic one, Normal version of valmiki ramayan is full of interpolation
@himalayanbhaiji680010 ай бұрын
हम उत्तराखंड में केदारखण्ड से हैं, और इस पूरे क्षेत्र को केदारखंड में बद्रीकाश्रम कहते हैं। तो वैष्णव भी, हम शैव भी हैं शाक्य भी हैं , क्योंकि हमारी अधीधाष्ट्री देवी माँ जगदम्बा भवानी हैं। और ये बद्रीनाथ का आश्रम है। तो जम्बूद्वीप, आर्यावर्त, भारतवर्षे , उत्तराखंड, केदारखंडे, बद्रीकाश्रम मंदाकिनी तटे औंकारेश्वर भूमि ऊखीमठ (ऊषामठ) जन्मस्थली स्थित:.हम सनातनी हैं। #HyperQuest जवाब जरूर देना।
@jayeshvaishnav438310 ай бұрын
Very informative....Jay Shree Ram 🙏🏻🚩
@subhankarsahu98010 ай бұрын
Jay Siya Ram 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@shyamalendusarkar779710 ай бұрын
🙏 Jai Jai Shri Ram 🙏
@dharmendrakumar961510 ай бұрын
U r really a gem for sanatan dharm far better than our Godman gurus
@sidhirbhavatikarmaja10 ай бұрын
Well what is says is after reading a book with translation or after reading someone's bhasya(Its common for anyone) but those bhasya and translations are done by Sadhu sants and gurus only
@SwarajSahu10 ай бұрын
have you ever listened to ny guru? ever visited any katha?
@priyanshu901010 ай бұрын
Ispe veducation ne bohot details se video banaya h
@BHARATKUMAR-ov9xt10 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम...🙏🙏🙏
@PSA98310 ай бұрын
Love from uttarakhand sir 🕉️🚩🙏
@arpitsharma334610 ай бұрын
Jai Shree Ram 🙏
@gurigurdit371710 ай бұрын
Bhai Dil khus kr diya ❤❤❤❤ emotional 😢😢😢 kr diya
@UPSCAspirant-f1x10 ай бұрын
आप बहुत अच्छा काम कर रहे हैं किसको किसको ये चैनल पसंद है वो लाइक करें 😊❤👍
@kishorisahoo608810 ай бұрын
Apne photo me jo lab or kush dikhaye... Bo bahat hin pyaare the 🥰
@VarshaSingh-bs8dm10 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम❤❤❤❤❤
@BIGOnlineGuru10 ай бұрын
GURU JI AAJ BHI HMARE SAMAJ ME AISE GURU KI KAMI HAI . HMARA SANATAN DHARM KITNA MHAN HAI YE AAPKI VIDEO SE PATA CHALTA HAI #BIGONLINEGURU
@Video_Story1910 ай бұрын
Jai shree ram ❤
@suniltomar898710 ай бұрын
Sabse prachin balmiki ramamyan hai
@Kindnessrules202410 ай бұрын
Reasons why Uttarkhand in interpolated: In description of Ram's character before his coronation his qualities is of a very strong person who include intolerance to gossipers and people who malign others, also he was a transparent and just always hand Sita was aa self respecting woman who was always treated with love and dignity. Therefore Uttarkand in which ram simply directs Laxman to abandon Sita in forest without any conversation with her, and does not punish the dhoti who maligns the character of his own wife and comments on Sita is completely contradictory. It was added later by social priests to indicate that women should stay subdued and do not leave houses without husband's permission. Not a part of original Valmiki Ramayana.
@huklo633110 ай бұрын
Ye hyper quest played safe so he don't offend anyone
@maharanapratap945810 ай бұрын
Bilkul shi h ye striyon ko neeche rkhne ke liye joda h
@Eternal_stardust10 ай бұрын
true, not a part of valmiki ramayan
@HarryPercy023710 ай бұрын
Yess
@sabhyatabharti426010 ай бұрын
Maine sanskrit course khareed liye!🎉🥳
@YogeshSZhala10 ай бұрын
Jai shree Ram ji
@subhashbagle875710 ай бұрын
जय जय सीयाराम।।््जय जय सीयाराम।।। जैसी दृष्टि वैसी सृष्टि।।। तथा यह भी सच हैं कि जादा ज्ञान भ्रमित करता है।।। और इसका दूषपरिणाम हम भुगत चूके हैं आकमंतआओ के जरिए तथा सोनेकी चिड़िया वाला भारत बिखर गया था जो जख्म आज भी हम पा रहें हैं और अपनी कमजोरियां आज भी उनकी ताकद बनीं हैं।।। फिर भी ऐसे उलझनोंको हम और कितने कालतक समझते रहेंगे।।।।???।।। मैं ने जो टि वि पर उत्तर रामायण समझा हैं तो उस तरह मुझे कोई भी ग़लत नहीं लगा था और आज तक मैंने कोई ऐसा विवाद उस समय नहीं देखा ।।। उत्तर रामायण सही है।।।।
@SinghandShorts008110 ай бұрын
Make a video on Devi Draupadi's character as it is given in original Mahabharata because she is the most controversial charcracter of Mahabharata some says she was filled with jealousy, anger, and revenge but some says that she was the most graceful lady that can ever be whether as a queen or as a wife or as a woman 🙏 She is also being blamed as the reason of Mahabharata 🙏
@krishnaverma523210 ай бұрын
Good topic
@perpetualprosperity296310 ай бұрын
She is not a characterful lady. No characterful lady in that era would have accepted being wife of 5 brothers. She was married to Arjuna but she wasn't satisfied with one Arjuna thus accepted wilfully. In her past life she wanted a husband of all the qualities which was impossible in one person.
@perpetualprosperity296310 ай бұрын
He will sugar coat it nicely😂
@HyperQuest10 ай бұрын
Thankyou for your comment. We will try to bring a video on this topic soon. Stay tuned! 🙏😊
@Rhthcv10 ай бұрын
@@perpetualprosperity2963 hr kpi tere npbi ki trh nhi hai
@JaiRadhaKrishna17 ай бұрын
Radha Radha 💖
@samardipsingh91910 ай бұрын
Very good explanation . Jai Shree Krishna
@Sunilrachit10 ай бұрын
Jai Jai Siyaram....... Jai Baba Virbajarangbali.......
@madhvikaushik785510 ай бұрын
who read RAMCHARITMANAS ,PROUD TO BE SANATANI..
@JaishreeRam-vj2eg.10 ай бұрын
Yes!!!❤
@cosmos-7s6 ай бұрын
Thankyou for giving such a great knowledge about our prabhu Sri Ram ...jai sri ram
@vijayshankarsingh659410 ай бұрын
ज्ञानवर्धक वीडियो है,,,, उस समय की मान्यताओं एवं परिस्थितियों का अध्ययन एवं अनुशीलन बहुत आवश्यक है,,, तभी कोई निष्कर्ष निकाला जा सकता है,, और कथा का मर्म भी समझा जा सकता है।
@shivangdubey739710 ай бұрын
Bhaiya, please make video on ashwamedha yagya, they say in this yagya horse is sacrificed and Bali pratha is imposed
@dipanshu_tiwari44810 ай бұрын
गर्व से कहो हम हिन्दू है।
@YT_6jhbvc10 ай бұрын
Hindu ,Garv se kaise kahe khudko😅 ?
@dipanshu_tiwari44810 ай бұрын
Apani amma se puch
@YT_6jhbvc10 ай бұрын
@@dipanshu_tiwari448 Teri Amma Achaa Batati hai Lagta Hai . Usi se Puch lunga 😅
@YT_6jhbvc10 ай бұрын
@@dipanshu_tiwari448 MEre Kehne Ka matlab ye Tha Ki Hamare Grantho mai Kahi hindu shabd nahi ,, To Ya To Garv Se Sanatani , Vaidik Dharmi ya Arya Kahe .. Hindu kyu bole ,? Mai Bas itna hi puchna Chah rha tha , lekin Lagta Hai Aapne Sanskar nahi Sikhe ... Sharm kariye apne bartav par...! Jis Bhasha Mai bola tumne Usi mai Pa gaye .!! Ab acha Lagega 👍🙏
@PlusMinus200210 ай бұрын
You are a diplomatic guy
@ऋषिकेश-य4ह10 ай бұрын
सर आप डाॅ विकास दिव्यकीर्ति द्वारा कहें गए वाल्मीकि रामायण में वर्णित आपत्तिजनक घटनाएं जैसे श्री राम द्वारा मांस और मदिरा सेवन और वैश्या भोग पर भी एक विडियो बनाए। ❤🙏🏻
@radhasoami960810 ай бұрын
Bro unho na asa nahi kaha bass isi ka bara ma kaha joa video ma batya gaya ha
@shobhakale795610 ай бұрын
बहुत ही बढिया हैं!बेहद के बेहद की परम परम परम महाशांति हैं!❤
@Kindnessrules202410 ай бұрын
I strong urge all to read or hear original Valmiki Ramayana and the character Of Ram is of a strong brave Kshatriya with confidence and intellect to rule people and guide them. In Uttarkan Raam is portrayed as a weak person who instead of guiding his people in the right direction submits to rumor. Completely contradicts Valmiki's portrayal of Ram's character. Lot of research to indicate Uttarkand was added by social moral high priests to put down their own rules for women and society. They added it to Raamayana as that was 1 reference for all families and thus gave a moral ground to their dictates.
@Tech_burner-c8g10 ай бұрын
Bro there are plenty of verses in Ramayan itself which contradicts one with another so that doesn't mean uttar kaand is not authentic
@abhisheksinghshakya18110 ай бұрын
bro ram doesn't give any teachings like buddha don,t have any proof and their supernatural powers are only limited in ramayan stories when Britishser ruled on india where were ram and all 33×10^7 Devi devtas and ram murded many peoples he was a criminal in my point of view
@ganeshd52772 ай бұрын
चतुर्विशतिसहस्त्राणी श्लोकानांमुक्तवान ऋषी : ततः सर्गशतान पंच् षटकाण्डानि तथोन्तरम् l (बालकाण्ड :4/2) वाल्मिकी रामायण, बालकाण्डसे यह श्लोक. इसमे स्पष्ट कहा गया है के छह खंड या कांड लिखकर ऋषीने या द्रष्टाने इसे लोकमानसके लिए मुक्त कर दिया है.
@MohitVerma-yj2gr10 ай бұрын
@veducation channel highly recommended for topics like this
@vikramjat94710 ай бұрын
यह साबित करता है कि मूल रूप से सभी धर्म/पंथ mythology हैं और मनुष्यों द्वारा निर्मित, अलौकिक प्राणियों द्वारा नहीं। केवल भौतिकवादी दुनिया ही वास्तविकता है यदि ऐसा नहीं है तो धार्मिक शिक्षक भोजन क्यों खाते हैं क्योंकि कई बार धर्मग्रंथों में यह कहा गया है कि संत भोजन के बिना रह सकते हैं। केवल आपकी जाति और नस्ल ही वास्तविकता है। अगर किसी को ठेस पहुंची है तो मैं माफी मांगता हूं🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@funNyShOrt_viDe010 ай бұрын
अगर मिलावट है तो सब कुछ मिलावट है बात खत्म ,वैसे सब लोग जानते ही है काल्पनिक हर चीज है
@SanataniDevansh410 ай бұрын
Bro but you didn't answer the fact that Vibhishan said that he has never heard that a "doot" is killed.
@maskiritype10 ай бұрын
Exactly
@SandeepMeena7910 ай бұрын
किसी भी समय के नैतिक मूल्य इतने बुरे नहीं हो सकते की किसी को धार्मिक पुस्तक पढ़ने पर मौत की सजा दे दी जाए वो भी एक पुरुशोउत्तम भगवान के अवतार के द्वारा।
@riteshkumarprajapati749810 ай бұрын
युद्धकांड के अंत में जो फलश्रुति दी गई है वह पूरे रामायण की फलश्रुति है युद्धकांड की नहीं अतः आपका महाभारत की फलश्रुतियों वाला तर्क अनुचित लगता है।
@agniswar310 ай бұрын
Uttarkand is like a sequel to the main story of Ramayana.
@descendantofbharatbharatva715510 ай бұрын
@@agniswar3it's narratives are highly inconsistent with the narratives of all previous 6 kands
@Ssameep9 ай бұрын
जय श्री राम जय श्रीराम जय श्रीराम। jay Shree Ram Jayashree Ram Ram Ram Jayashree Ram.
@subhankarsahu98010 ай бұрын
Uttar kand is fully real and authentic.
@_Vaibhav_Rai10 ай бұрын
Prove it
@namopatel-ij6cc10 ай бұрын
uttar kand is false..its later addition..uttarkand kand has so many contradictory verses to balmiki ramayan
@@namopatel-ij6cc if uttarkand is interpolated then other scriptures like shrimad bhagwatam , padma puran, adhyatama ramayan(written by ved vyas ji), kalidas's epic raghuvansham are also inauthentic because all these scriptures contains the story of lav kush, vanvas of mata sita and shambhuk vadh katha. If you heard about sri dhar swami who was a shankaracharya of goverdhan math in jagannath puri, he wrote a commentary on srimadh bhagwatam known as "Sri Dhari Tika" and maheshwar tirtha ji who wrote commentary on "Valmiki Ramayan" (including uttarkand) they both are fools because they believe that uttarkand is authentic. Please read "Ramayan Mimansa" granth written by dharma samrat swami karpatri ji maharaja. Swami ji gives all the ans releated to ramayan,authenticity of uttarkand,lav and kush,vanvas of mata sita, shambhuk vadh.
@MukeshKumar-gc3uy10 ай бұрын
Jay Shree Krishna!!!💞🙂
@Anubhavsengupta190210 ай бұрын
Sir I have a question for you,why is meat eating prohibited in Hinduism?,While it's true that I do eat meat but I know the real reason behind that,but I still want you to make a video on that topic.🚩🕉️
@rajeshchaurasiya910 ай бұрын
Meat-eating is not prohibited. In fact nothing is prohibited in sanatan religion. Everything action has consequences. Karma comes back to u. That is it. Think of a lion. It doesn't know anything else to eat. But he has to fight for that & he can die. But in fighting so.. he becomes king too. But he does prematurely. That is the karma. Besides it is nature of meat food is that it makes to restless, destroys mind peace. If done too much. But also sometimes, eating meet is necessary for warriors for quick gain of muscle power. Observe nature. Think deeply. You will get your answer
@descendantofbharatbharatva715510 ай бұрын
Scriptures are filled with instances of meat eating, animal sacrifices etc
@MohitMishra-d6l10 ай бұрын
It is prohibited because we are taking the life of a living being, and it causes them harm. If we cannot create life, then we have no permission to take one... These living beings can feel pain just like us, which is why we have no permission to eat meat or kill any living beings. In the case of the food chain, it's important to note that other animals cannot differentiate between what is good and what is bad, unlike humans. Lions, for example, have no choice but to eat meat as it is a part of their natural diet, and their actions are not counted in terms of karma. Only human actions have karmic effects; animals are exempt from this. and the person which is saying for worriors they are allowed to eat meat... thats WRONG!!! they are not!!!!....if they say they are allowed because they are worriors then ask them the proofs!!! where is it wriiten!!! beacuse our sanatan dharm .. because or sanatan dharam says "धर्म की जय हो, अधर्म का नाश हो, प्राणियों में सद्भावना हो एवं विश्व का कल्याण हो" JAI SHREE RAM
@descendantofbharatbharatva715510 ай бұрын
@@MohitMishra-d6l I can site from the scriptures
@LionelMessi5476110 ай бұрын
I have the answer. Meat and fish eating is not prohibited in Hinduism. Both vegetarian and non vegetarian are a part of Hinduism In Vaishnavism and Shaivism sect of Hinduism, vegetarianism is compulsory whereas in Shaktism (worship of mother goddess like Kali, Durga and her forms) and Tantra vegetarianism is not compulsory, non veg food are allowed except beef. That's why you can see that in Bengal and Assam most of hindus are non veg. Even fish and meat are offered as prasad. (You can see various kali temples, it's a tradition). Many shakto devotees and saints like Ramakrishna Paramhansa, Swami vivekananda, sri Arobindo, bapakhepa, etc. of Bengal were non veg. They are as much as part of Hinduism as Vaishnavism and Shaivism are
@ananyasahoo261510 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the Sanskrit course, looking forward to it
@AnjuSingh-ov2qr10 ай бұрын
Please make a video on the book the beautiful tree by historian Dharampal ji it's about indigenous Indian education system and dalit and women education system and this will prove that dalits and women also get education in ancient India
@maharanapratap945810 ай бұрын
Shi h esa ho
@sidhirbhavatikarmaja10 ай бұрын
Well there was no concept of dalit in that time
@Bhargav-m3v10 ай бұрын
જય શ્રી રામ જય માતાજી
@BaimanikRoy10 ай бұрын
No KZbinr name druve rathee is targetted in this video😂😂
@Hameshsahu2710 ай бұрын
कृपया भविष्य मालिका पर भी एक वीडियो जरूर बनाइयेगा। जय जगन्नाथ🚩 ⭕❗⭕
@abhisekpaul987310 ай бұрын
Love your videos...Kindly make a detailed video on Casteism in Hinduism...❤
@YesIcandoit-t1g10 ай бұрын
Sanatan dharm me Varn vyvastha thi Casteism word come from west Cast we told today was our family blood line name Like Chhaturvedi surname means 4 vedo ko janane vala
@descendantofbharatbharatva715510 ай бұрын
@@YesIcandoit-t1g Puri Shankaracharya Swami himself says everytime that caste/jati/varn all are just same concept and everything is birth based only. He deliberately promotes and supports untouchability and birth based casteism prejudicial discriminatory hierarchical structure and it's oppressive practices by citing scriptural references. Every trads folks too does the same. Thus implies the fact that casteism is inherent and inseparable part of hinduism
@utkarshsharma900210 ай бұрын
@@descendantofbharatbharatva7155 Bhagwat Gita 18:41 ब्राह्मण-क्षत्रिय-विषम शूद्रनं च परंतप कर्माणि प्रविभक्तानि स्वभाव-प्रभावैर गुणैः ब्राह्मणों, क्षत्रियों, वैश्यों और शूद्रों के कर्तव्यों को उनके गुणों के अनुसार, उनके गुणों के अनुसार (जन्म से नहीं) वितरित किया जाता है। Bhagwat Gita is the only truth every other things are manipulated some by the thoughts of saint some by some philosopher. They are human being they can be wrong.
@buddha971510 ай бұрын
@@descendantofbharatbharatva7155 rig ved doesnt mention a jati system , varna system is mentioned which is way different from jati system. So let me ask you, who is the ultimate dictum here?Puri shankaracharya or the vedas?
@harsh312harshh10 ай бұрын
@@descendantofbharatbharatva7155no one belive in pakhndi shankrachrya 😂bcz upnishad vedas said varn is by karm knly
@seemasinghal547610 ай бұрын
Bahut hi achha explanation... Dhanyawad
@Anubhavsengupta190210 ай бұрын
Sir I have question for you sir, are there only two epics in Hinduism only which are Ramayana and Mahabharata or are there even more lesser known epics that very less people talk about?,I would really to know your thoughts on that.🙏🕉️
@DoctorJain-vy2gx10 ай бұрын
There are also other epics which are not famous you can google it Some of them are Meghnad Badh Kavya
@mr.gamerkabir814210 ай бұрын
There is also maharamayana(yogavashishta) as well
@DoctorJain-vy2gx10 ай бұрын
ksheera sagara mathanam , king pruthu , prahlada, king bali , Ambareesha , Bhageeradha , Yayaathi , Lord Sri Krishna's full life story , Markandeya charitra , king Bharatha (on account of whom this country is called Bharatha varsham ) ,
@ujjwalyadav378310 ай бұрын
Shankar parampara ka grnth hai 🤣🤣@@mr.gamerkabir8142
@agniswar310 ай бұрын
@Anubhavsengupta Ramayana and Mahabharata are the greatest works of Hindu literature and they are usually called Itihasa or history books written in an epic style. There are a lot of other epics as well but these two are the most important and holiest and authorative.
@aryansen658010 ай бұрын
If anybody have confusion about sambook vadh please watch the video of veducation by prateek bhaiya
@tanush-ms5sl10 ай бұрын
Ek Baar Sanatan reveals search kare Uttar Khand Ramayan ka Part Nahi Hai Oor Clear ho jaega
@YT_6jhbvc10 ай бұрын
" AryaVart Regenerator " already proved It through proof. Brilliantly 🎉
@tanush-ms5sl10 ай бұрын
Ek Baar Sanatan reveals search kare Uttar Khand Ramayan ka Part Nahi Hai Oor Clear ho jaega
@namitaranisahoo62410 ай бұрын
Dhanyawad Bhai,,, Hare Krishna 🙏
@d1dofficial10010 ай бұрын
𝓙𝓪𝓲 𝓼𝓱𝓻𝓮𝓮 𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓲🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@prashantkumarmishra269510 ай бұрын
या एक बहुत ही सरल तरीका है आप हंश की तरह सही झूठ को अलग-अलग नहीं कर सकते हो तो आप सब को जो हृदय से सही लगे उसे सही मानिए
@manavgarg25310 ай бұрын
Jo bhi hindu rashtra chahta hai like kare❤❤
@ayushpandey417710 ай бұрын
Jai shree ram sir....sir mandir ki pran pratishta par bahut vivvad chide hue hai...pls aap ispar video banaye..ki sanatan ki kis granth mein temple ke pran pratishts ke rules ke varnan hai aur kya ham mandir ke purn hone se pehle...uski pran pratishta nahi kar sakte
@arindamchaudhary910 ай бұрын
People doesn't really understand the Uttarakand... Whatever Shri Ram was doing was Him showing things that were prevalent in the then society, what social norms were binding upon him as a human being and a king despite which He was able to keep an absolutely clean personal life unlike His own father. Shri Ram Himself mentions to Brahma that He despite being an incarnation of Vishnu, must act as an ordinary human being. And every human being by nature has his own set of social bindings, dilemma and flaws. If something is remarkable, it is because, despite these turmoils, the Man was absolutely flawless in His personal life... Valmiki, despite being the author and establishing Shri Ram as the ideal man, himself speaks out against Sita parityag, which clearly shows his motive.
@sayantanghosh671410 ай бұрын
The problem is, if Lord Ram was only doing what is prevalent in the society and unable to differentiate between right and wrong, he cannot be considered ideal man or God. Society always follows a great man. Uttarkand in Ramayan + many Puranas are not authentic scriptures.
@arindamchaudhary910 ай бұрын
@@sayantanghosh6714 On what basis or proof are you saying the Uttara Ramayana is not authentic... Is it just your feeling or do you have proof... Whereas there are proofs enough even at the beginning of Ramayana that Uttar Kaand is very much a part of it. The definition of good and bad changes with time... Lord Parashuram killed Kshatriyas 21times was it good or bad? Whenever the good established by the previous avatara becomes sour, a new avatar arrives to narrate a new idea of Dharma as per the Yuga's needs. Otherwise many actions of Krishna would not seem correct if seen in the context of the Dharma established by Rama. Rama avatar is God's Leela and He is showing us the evils prevalent in those days society and protesting against the then Brahmanical society, sometime Himself by dominating Parshuram or killing Ravana, sometime through His better half, by protesting against the prevalent customs. That is why the second name given by Valmiki to the Ramayana is Seetayasya Charita Mahatam.
@sayantanghosh671410 ай бұрын
@@arindamchaudhary9 I have no problem with other things you have said. There may be changes in how the avatars deal with similar problems at different times. However, some things are absolute such that definition of good and bad does not change with time. 1. Slaughtering someone doing tapasya is a criminal offence at every day and age. Forget Maryada Purushottam, even a petty offender of low IQ would not indulge in such acts. If you were Sambuk and someone just blew your head off for only performing tapasya, would you brush it off only calling it a “sour” experience or criminal experience demanding his jail or death penalty? kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHLRhXusotqkeZY 2. Again owning several wives is wrong at every day and age. According to Mahabharata Krishna Bhagwan had only 1 wife: Rukmini. Rest of the made up stories such as stealing clothes, several wives, etc are mentioned in some Bhagvat puranas, which were written several 100 years after Mahabharata was composed. If someone justifies these act in the name of bhakti, it is his own pregrogative. In Bhagvad gita 3.21, Krishna says “Whatever action is performed by a great man, common men follow in his footsteps. And whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world pursues.” Therefore either Ram or Krishna will never indulge in acts that a common man is definitely not supposed to follow. Unfortunately, thoughtless Hindus have become like those Muslims who perform language gymnastics to justify every abominable verse in the Quran. For them preserving the scripture, whether right or wrong, is more important than applying their brains. kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpCZm3yno7qdlbM 4. It is also possible that parts of Uttar Kand may be interpolated but it is impossible entire UttarKand is correct. First six chapters builds the satus of Ram as an ideal man, followed by Uttar Kand that undoes his image built through the first 6 chapters. You can watch the video links and let me know if there is anything wrong. You will find the answer to your question regarding “what is the basis” of my claims
@StoryMaker-h9z10 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤😊har har Mahadev 🙏
@utkarshsharma900210 ай бұрын
I respect your content and this idea, but I still think Uttar-Kand is added after the ramayan, It was not added by mugal and British. But it was added by the few corrupt Brahamans who wanted to have the power of knowledge and wanted to be the part of society where they're born and lucky, and choosen by god so they born in Brahman kul. They thought if we'll add this part and we'll use god's name to justify this no one will question this. But as time went past people started questioning it.
@huklo633110 ай бұрын
Ye it's arrogant of hyper quest this time or maybe they want to keep everyone faith
@m1ytcaws10 ай бұрын
Bhai added hey ya nahi ye Jaane k liye hanuman ji ka ya bramha ji ka tapasya kar k pata lagalo q key wahi hee uss time main thai... Agar tumhare andar tap karne kee sakti hey to... Q key wahi hee bata saktey hey kya added hey ya nahi
@Vrindaavanpremi0410 ай бұрын
Jai Shree Ram ❤ Thank you so much bhaiya wanting for you next video 🙏🏻🥺