"Case Analysis and Briefing," with Molly Shadel and Anne Coughlin

[@user-eo4sb2nr5d]

"There is no such thing as a perfect brief" is now a sticky note on my computer monitor. I needed that. Love this channel.

[@michaelangileo2760]

Remarkable teachers.. such diligence, care and clarity. Thank you!

[@robbiem4624]

This is how law professor should be instead of just expected to know everything when you walk into your first day of law school.

[@Sarahhlynn1995]

Professor Shadel is amazing. She makes things so easy to understand

[@missjennablejen]

I studied this case for my introduction law class, and I enjoy the case briefings. I wish I knew these tips before I took the class!

[@FabianMc-Law]

I like how you guys explained the topics of the cases and briefs. Although I don’t inspire to be a philosopher, and it doesn’t necessary mean a person who is a philosopher will be a very good talented lawyer because they are considered a philosopher. But when it comes to reading cases, I consider myself an analytical person. And I’m very passionate about the analytical part of cases because I enjoy taking apart the facts of the topic of cases, and figure out which parts of the issues would be the material facts that can be supported by admissible evidence. Nonetheless, your teachings are most enjoyable. Thanks for sharing! 👍🏾😊

[@shaydean9478]

I’ve watched you more than 4 times. You’re awesome. Very detailed, informative and awesome.

[@Oleander4G]

Would be beneficial if a link to a pdf of the handout referenced for the case brief example was in the video description.

[@cmatrix4761]

Again, great work, UVa. Really appreciate these videos.

[@Frank_Cohen]

Will you please post the projected handouts? Thank you.

[@rashellsey2934]

I want it both, jogging in a jug and brief in a bottle! I love this video and how you ladies explain briefing! Thank you!

[@richardrosenthal4056]

I am an expert witness and I find this approach extremely useful to help me frame (not bias) my opinion.

[@Noname72105]

That triangle is a capital delta. The abbreviations are basically a D and P.

[@davidsoto4394]

Please do a video like this one for Prroperty.

[@romee-elise]

Hi. Thank you for your wonderful explanations. I have a question. How about Matthews v Baxter 1873? If one party knew the other party was intoxicated, the contract is voidable. When the party was sober, he or she can choose to repudiate the contract or enforce the contract. Is it because in Lucy v Zehmer, the party was not intoxicated enough so the contract is enforceable?

[@wgkersey9097]

i think it is because both parties are under the influence that it stands

[@soulwayband1830]

How about to fix sound problems?

[@fridaydaniel2644]

wow I really enjoyed this class.

[@byrnegrrl]

This is excellent and much appreciated.

[@davidsoto4394]

Excellent video.

[@emyh4659]

Wish someone would have told me this when i was in law school. Woaa would have made a huge difference.

[@skillmanlaw2]

THINKING THE CASE THROUGH, FOR SELF

[@msxmurda2385]

Funny...I guess *every* law school starts out with Lucy.

[@osalas36]

Law is so fascinating!

[@qlnguyen301]

it's not too late (at least in my career) to watch this video.

[@SuperKriekie]

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

[@sairamkethavath5232]

name of the case?

[@petertu7359]

Lucy v Zehmer

[@balindilebuhle25]

Who is watching this in 2024❤

[@parakeetsparakeets3972]

Thank you

[@bougee4967]

A judge doesn’t ‘make’ law, they apply the law, correct?

[@jaisaljohn1500]

indeed, advocates apply the law in their respective cases looking at the fact and evidence. Once judge in satisfied that yes apply of law relevant to material fact, he gives his decision or judgement. JUDGE IS ONLY UPHOLD THE LAW OR NO MISUSE OF LAW. SO, YOUR ANSWER LIES TO ADVOCATES POINT OF VIEW , NOTE: THATS WAHT I UNDERSTTOD OR INTERPRETED.

[@JohnShim-s6n]

Understanding the case requires a timeline or chronology: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXqzq4WLbduEg6c

[@barefootjakejake7765]

Lol dude who brought the whiskey did so deliberately and with intent to defraud the other guy out of real property. Did he get away with that?? I hope not.

[@simperingham]

He did. Also sounds like he was predatory in his practices too. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_v._Zehmer

[@ДмитрийДепутатов]

Lewis Helen Thompson Kenneth Garcia Elizabeth

[@janalabonte6331]

Mr .Zimmer was not of sound mind , regarding they were under the influence .😊

[@nagendratiwari3394]

Good

[@Chrisbearden656]

It's a restraining order. From alto. 2017

[@Chrisbearden656]

Issued Nov 15

[@manuvns]

Good one but why would you pay 200K to learn this ?

[@jackymarcel4108]

Hernandez Dorothy Wilson Sandra Martinez Steven

[@tusan20]

❤

[@Nahbbe]

Horrible audio. Keeps cutting out

[@evansjohnarek2271]

The woman is nice.

[@니모-b6w]

Taylor Anna Robinson Dorothy Williams Ruth

[@sandeephansdak314]

....and!....😃

[@LealofimuaLemusuKuresa]

Seki

[@rajendrasinghcharan4721]

Tell me topics of bread of criminal case file All Topic and point Advocate R charan

[@private8773]

No he was drunk at the time so can not make the agreement as he had no capacity to do so. Why take a half hour when one minute sums that up.

[@evansjohnarek2271]

This woman is so beautiful, can we have a date please?

[@sunnycoastQLD]

Capacity? He was drunk!

[@lisareed5669]

Go away Russian.

[@petertu7359]

Court held he was not so drunk as to lack capacity. Look at the unredacted case.

[@qlnguyen301]

But they had an offer and an acceptance.

[@evaindayjay366]

This is soo good sample but the Teache is very fast,. She is so excited to teach, Pls be slowly speaking,, IT would be nicer Thank you

[@athee3569]

Yup..lolzz

[@petertu7359]

I thought the pace was fine. Of course, I am an attorney and teach Lawyering at a law school. So the material was not entirely new. I also personally hate speakers who speak to slowly. It’s hard for me to pay attention when the speaker speaks too slowly. I will usually play the video at 1.5 x or 2x speed.

[@janina873]

You can adjust the playback speed :)