Valtioneuvoston tiedotustilaisuus HX-hankkeesta 10.12.

[@carramba66]

What about subtitles, at least finnish?

[@LRRPFco52]

FiAF and MoD already stated pretty clearly in 2015 that they wanted new technology and capability that had demonstrated future relevance, not something "warmed-over" from the past. F-35A exceeded or tied with all the other entrants in critical evaluation criteria, reaching an overall military performance score higher than any of the others of 4.47/5. 2nd place scored 3.81/5. F-35A was also the most affordable option of all 5, with Typhoon and Rafale exceeding the threshold limits for cost and not meeting the industrial sharing or sustainment desires of Finland. Cost between the next 2 (Gripen E/F + GlobalEye vs Super Hornet/Growler) was comparable enough to not make a difference. With the F-35A deal, it leaves them extra budget room to buy future missiles as well, on top of the huge order of advanced stealth cruise missiles and stand-off weapons that are already part of the F-35A deal.

[@Cube-3710]

How much did the EFT score?

[@LRRPFco52]

@@Cube-3710 Not published. Typhoon and Rafale manufacturers didn’t make a good case for industrial share or sustainability of supply, and were way over-budget just for acquisition with Unit Program Costs in the 200 Million Euro region. Unit flyaway costs are in the 150-160m Euro point for Rafale and Typhoon, which is just too much, for less capability compared to F-35A at almost half the price.

[@backstagecam5082]

30:00

[@isidad4150]

Taalla Amerikassa moni lentaja ei halua lentaa f-35 konetta, syy on digitaali osia on tilattu kiinasta,se on siis g5;n kontroloitavissa.

[@timmcmullen5]

Nice trolling.

[@Hairysteed]

"Täällä Amerikassa" - joopa joo! 😝

[@savaii4menow]

Here in America, we do send our condolences for the Loosers. No need to name names.

[@Hairysteed]

@@savaii4menow *losers loose [lu:s] = not tight lose [lu:z] = to not win