Video Abstract - The Unruh Effect in Slow Motion

This is the video abstract for Unruh Effect in Slow Motion.
www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/11/...
arxiv.org/abs/2011.08223

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

Expansion is a special kind of motion, and it seems that the Universe is a non-inertial frame of reference that performs variably accelerated motion (according to general estimates, this acceleration is: a=πcH).* Real gravitational fields are variable in space and time, and, developing GR**, we can now talk about the fact of the possibility of generating gravitational field in a non-inertial frame of reference (a=g).. That is, finally achieve global (instead of local in GR) compliance with the equivalence principle. Then the energy density of the relic radiation, that is, the evolving primary gravitational-inertial field (= space-time): J= g^2/8πG ~1500 quanta /cm ^3, which is in order of magnitude consistent with the observational-measured data (about 500 quanta/cm ^3). By the way, it turns out that the universe is 1.6 trillion years old! P.S. You can also use the Unruh formula, but with the addition of the coefficient q, which determines the number of phase transitions of the evolving system: q=√n', where n'=L/8πr(pl), L=c/H. Thus, T(relic)=[q]ħa/2πkc. --------------------- *) - w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H, a=r(pl)w(relic)^2 =g=πcH, intra-metagalactic gravitational potential: |ф0|=πGmpl/λrelic , m(pl)w(pl)=8πM(Universe)H; { w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H. **) - See "GR was QG".

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

GR was QG: docs.google.com/document/d/1FyD9vlFkQmVuVHWXNJSuuk6T86aJqqFG/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=110286572639581187540&rtpof=true&sd=true

[@shruggzdastr8-facedclown]

...but in the original thought experiment presented at the beginning of this video, the observer in motion is decelerating -- not accelerating

[@keith.anthony.infinity.h]

The term deceleration is avoided in physics, only acceleration is used because acceleration is a change in velocity over time whether slowing down or speeding up in a negative or positive direction in coordinate system.

[@shruggzdastr8-facedclown]

@@keith.anthony.infinity.h: Thanks for that clarification