Voltage Vs. Production - How Many Volts Are Needed For Molecule Separation

SR45:
Traditional electrolysis utilizes direct DC power, typically of low voltage and extremely high amperage. It takes huge amounts of amperage to convert water into HHO gas, using traditional methods. Therefore it is extremely inefficient (and dangerous). Gas production is a direct linearly-related function to amperage consumption --- meaning: the amount of gas produced is directly related to how many amps you can push though it.
Stanley Meyer's Electrical Polarization Process utilizes pulsed-DC power, typically of high voltage and extremely low amperage. It's the inverse, fundamental difference over the traditional state-of-the-art. Therefore, specifically at the cell, it is extremely efficient (and safer). Instead of a linear function, gas production is a direct exponentially-related function to voltage production --- meaning: the amount of gas produced is directly related to how high you can push the voltage.
TLDR:
Traditional Electrolysis = high power consumption, heat, danger
Electrical Polarization Process = high voltage production, no heat, low danger
Now, first you must understand my setup. I have 6 sets of cells each containing 6 individual tube pairs (resonant cavities). These 36 tube pairs are wired in series, so all my voltage readings must be divided by 36 to determine the voltage of each individual cell (resonant cavity).
It is clear to see that for each volt increased, more gas is produced. As a higher voltage is achieved, even more gas is produced -- and the effect does seem to be on an exponential level, because gas really starts to pour out of the tubes at ~140volts. That means that per individual tube (resonant cavity), my voltage is a mere 3.8 volts! Conclusion -- It barely takes any voltage to disassociate the water molecule when subjected to an EOP pulse. I can only imagine taking the threshold up to 5 or even 10 volts (360v total).
The bottle neck here is that to truly take this to the next level, complex math must be done. Sadly, transformer mathematics are not my strong suit and without a electronics mathematician, I am reduced to the never-ending prototyping "see what sticks" methodology. Drop me a line if you know someone who could help.

[@h2opower]

Since we are talking about the atoms, IE, the atom's electrons we already know what voltages are needed to get those atoms to start ejecting their electrons. Now you have to use the same space gap Meyer used between the cells or it changes things. The closer the plates of the capacitor are the lower the voltages needed to reach the threshold of ionization but the load placed on the transformer is too high. Too large of a gap and the wire's protective coating will give out before the threshold of ionization is reached on the plates of the water capacitor resulting in a shorted out transformer. Now I know how to go about protecting the mosfet also. It took me a while to understand how this technology works and trust me when I tell you this as of right I'm one of less than a hand full of people that understand the science behind this technology. The reason I know is I taught those other people so that in the event I'm unalived the technology lives on. Think about all the things I have written about in my post on your KZbin vids and do know this technology is mimicking the earth's Global Electric Circuit. If you still don't believe me then just simply compare the Voltage Intensifier Circuit against photos of the earth's Global Electric Circuit and know that mother nature has been doing this much longer than man has by a long shot.

[@noahauman]

There's a lot to digest here. I'm not "ejecting electrons" just yet. I'm simply disassociating the H from O. Ionization only happens at perhaps 1kv to 10kV and above. My cells current max is about 4.16v per cavity, at resonance. I've had little success with using any gaps above a few millimeters. Mine are less than 2mm. Not sure about the wire protective coating you are discussing. Where does it give out? I have no idea of this "Global Electric Circuit" you speak of, but sounds interesting. Nature has been splitting water with lighting forever.

[@h2opower]

@@noahauman Give me your email so that I can work with you on this personally as there is a lot to learn about this technology and in order to do so properly I have to use photos, graphs, and other visual means to convey just how this technology works. Note, even Stanley Meyer messed up a few things but didn't live long enough to be able to make the proper adjustments and/or fixes needed.

[@noahauman]

@@h2opower please see my contact info on my YT profile page.

[@h2opower]

@@noahauman Okay

[@SoSPoductions]

Nice work. I sometimes wonder if hooking the cells in series is what Stan meant my allowing voltage take over and do the work. Can you apply a gate off time to allow pulse train?

[@noahauman]

That quote of Stan's simply means that by restricting the amp flow (current restriction through resistance and resonant function of circuit), it allows voltage to be high (in the water-capacitors), allowing the voltage "pressure" to perform the molecule disassociation, instead of amp-"electron-exchange"-flow that DC electrolysis offers. Gate time would simply allow me to control the amount of gas produced, in a similar manor to what varying the input voltage does.

[@SoSPoductions]

@@noahauman ah i see, thanks

[@jonbigman9723]

All Stanley did was create a water capacitor then step charged it till the capacitor broke down or discharged.

[@noahauman]

I don't think the capacitor broke down or discharged. It maintained a defined voltage level and it is the (water) dielectric that broke down. Discharge = amp flow = not wanted.

[@astrophile9072]

What is this all ??

[@noahauman]

Separating water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. See my intro video.

[@aware2action]

Holy grail, to save the world, from its -energy- fossil energy, animal farming fueled destruction. Good luck for your success😊

[@noahauman]

Water is the most beautiful substance on earth. Without it, all would die, but it can also kill you. It can put out fires or become fire, itself. It is a beautiful balance of energy, weak in of itself, but massively powerful in quantity. Just two measly atoms that contain more atomic energy than one would ever need. I disagree with you only to the fact it is greed-fueled destruction. Energy is merely the vehicle. Thank you for reaching out.