Volvo S60 (2020) ALL Crash Tests [Front, Side, Side Pole]

[@wuryan1160]

S60 is so great in protection of drivers

[@B.JK1903]

VOLVO : THE world SAFEST car !

[@StockTurboN20]

Im about to get my girlfriend a 2019 S60

[@khujlihindustanivines3893]

Amazing build quality

[@PaulStewartAviation]

The side airbags didn't seem effective at 1:24. The curtains came down but you can barely see the side bag.

[@teddym2808]

I wonder if they'll ever increase the speed of the pole test.. 25 is low.. I guess since in that one test, the most modern cars are clearly at cabin protection tipping point, that it would be impossible or very hard to make them handle something at 50 or so?

[@waynerhea6649]

35 mph into a ridged wall is worse then 60 into a road barrier or another car those will absorb some impact those do not

[@JJ-wq5ey]

low mph... they put 35 mph low ... so you can’t be aware ... it has to be 65 mph or 75mph ... like the other tests of other cars.

[@khs5534]

so sporty and cool and safe luxury car!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@sjcongo]

Crashing @ 35 mph ... how about a real test with at least 60 ?

[@nick4k539]

Yess like the average speed on the highway!

[@endjexejac]

You don't hit a rigid barrier in real life

[@RTH-xo6gl]

Because it assumed smart people are breaking not going 60 mph on impact. Most over 45 mph are fatal in all cars / SUV’s

[@endjexejac]

Bruh 35mph into a wall equals to hitting something that bounces off or crumples with 60-70mph if not more

[@ChJeevan]

RIP🙏🙏🙏

[@alexanderstevens145]

No volume 🙁

[@Nozaakk]

the side impact affects the shoulder and the arm.

[@parodylover999]

I love it when a B pillar puts a dent in the middle of the cart brick and the doors just bend around it, then you know the car's got some serious meat on the bones and someone knew what they were doing!

[@RTH-xo6gl]

Good B pillar, doors always weakest point, but how many just door accidents at speed happen.

[@RealSafeCars]

RTH, you are correct, this is a less common type of accident. In case you are interested further... to see the alleged justification for adding this test, check out section II in this article: www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=one.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/Rulemaking/Rules/Associated%2520Files/214_Side_Impact_final_Aug_30_2007.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi30ejgzb3qAhVPgnIEHe2RB0UQFjAAegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw08Kn5g7BuGM9KU0CekWVaa

[@arpanakumari7147]

Fun fact- emergency brakes were not activated during first test😂

[@theamazoner4075]

💀💀

[@baraoszkar]

That’s not the point

[@amolitee]

the car is pulled by a belt system

[@user-ef8hh6rj8h]

👍👍👍

[@liaayu2777]

volvo doesn't intend to build cars but build tanks

[@itsmeee7364]

c class n 3 series performance better in pillar tests

[@2steaksandwiches665]

@@itsmeee7364 that’s fine but you still have to look at the 3 series if you own one.

[@thomasthedankengine1252]

@@itsmeee7364thats also just not true

[@Doc1855]

Volvo has received the IIHS Safety award, but the Subaru Outback and Forester have received the IIHS Safety PLUS award. Furthermore according to Consumer Reports, the 2019 and newer Outback and Forester are more reliable than Volvo

[@johnboy007]

Yeah, but they’re ugly

[@user-Timothy1]

My family's car

[@Nozaakk]

it's not a safe car. just analyze the test well and stop talking nonsense