Italy has a new aircraft carrier to bolster NATO's forces.
@stucco7610 сағат бұрын
Italy was always a nation with long naval tradition..regards from Greece
@michsky468 сағат бұрын
is pizzeria on the sea
@ilmaio6 сағат бұрын
@@michsky46 your girlfriend came to Italy in vacation and now she knows how men are supposed to be under the sheets; repair your ships.
@AnwarBanteng-gr7gu22 сағат бұрын
Support NATO ❤ from Egypt 🇪🇬
@NoWonderDragon10 сағат бұрын
Norwegian navy has ordered 6 (!) new 212CD submarines (which is much larger than the original 212).
@altiyoltercume486117 сағат бұрын
Turkish TCG Anadolu and Spanish Juan Carlos are twinses ... if Juan Carlos is an aircraft carrier why to consider Juan Carlos as aircreft carrier and ignore the turkish twins
@met71metaldetector5517 сағат бұрын
In reality, the Juan Carlos is not an aircraft carrier but an HD with the ability to carry fixed wings, but it is normally considered an aircraft carrier, while the Anadolu has no fighters but it can carry drones so it is not an aircraft carrier if it ever carries drones, if the Spanish do not buy the F35Bs it will have to be transformed into a drone carrier too, Italy and other NATO countries are also planning to build new full-deck drone carriers, so they should also be considered aircraft carriers, but they are drone carriers. I remind you that when a ship is considered an aircraft carrier it is really for having the capacity and hangar for maintenance of air vehicles, otherwise it is considered an aircraft carrier for support.,In the Mediterranean the only real aircraft carriers are the French one and the Cavour, while the Trieste is designed to be one but for now it acts as a flight deck.
@JosemanuelMartinezazuara-bt9qo15 сағат бұрын
Que pesaos,pues porque el turko no tiene aviónes
@tuncbilek8413 сағат бұрын
@@JosemanuelMartinezazuara-bt9qoAma Silahlı insansız hava araçlarımız var. Onları kullanacağız.😊
@metehangokturk969612 сағат бұрын
@@JosemanuelMartinezazuara-bt9qo.. Es muy triste que sean tan estúpidos. Ni siquiera se molestan en investigar.
@altiyoltercume486111 сағат бұрын
@met71metaldetector55 so let's think that an airxraft carrier loses all its aircrafts during war and now it has no aircraft anymore. Does it kose its classification as aircraft carrier?... you have an artillary but may be you dont have convenient shells to fire. Does it mean that you do not have an artillary?
@jonmce113 сағат бұрын
Really not much of a comparison, in some cases suggesting 6500 ton vessels are equivalent to others under 1000 tons. Also countries tend to build ships suitable for their areas of operation. Ships for the north Atlantic for example must be larger and more heavily built than equivalants in less demanding areas. Also the range at which countries operate typically is a major condition of capability.
@veteranos245919 сағат бұрын
Hellenic navy...The Aigean protector ..🇬🇷
@serdaryilmaz623012 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@EDJUKATOR11 сағат бұрын
protect from what? from the junta movement enossis?
@MetehanKaragüzel10 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@stucco7610 сағат бұрын
I am glad you laugh but when Greek navy met Turkish the result is turkish ships for dive tours....our navy has never been defeated I have no idea where your arrogance comes from.
@EDJUKATOR9 сағат бұрын
@@stucco76 yeah like 1974 ground hidder navy
@nickreece54778 сағат бұрын
Interesting opinion, but you haven't distinguished between SSN and SSBN, or nuclear powered vs diesel electric, simply clubbing together as submarines.
@sevketalanyal808722 сағат бұрын
Why didnt u consider TCG Anadolu Aircraft Carrier at Turkish Fleet while you do it for Spain's Juan Carlos ?
@MAXIMUSLOK18 сағат бұрын
Because you have no jets on board. Neither you will (CAATSA). BTW NATO?😂 You cooperating with Iran and Russia AKA a Chinese dominion. Hi from the US MAX.
@timosthomo56618 сағат бұрын
Because turkey 🦃 is nothing
@altiyoltercume486117 сағат бұрын
@MAXIMUSLOK these are irrelevant answers... these two ships are twins...
@met71metaldetector5517 сағат бұрын
Because it is a drone carrier not considered an aircraft carrier, then not even the Juan Carlos would be an aircraft carrier but an LHD that can carry a fixed wing embarked. Which soon won't even have an embarked wing anymore if Spain doesn't buy the F35 Bs.
@panionios195816 сағат бұрын
Because Anadolu is for Luna parks. Erdogan is kidding you, but not us.
@KyawMoe-d5k14 сағат бұрын
US CRUISERS ?????
@vtecharrys.69817 сағат бұрын
I noticed that too. The US has 74 active Arleigh Burke destroyers, with the 74th delivered to the Navy over a month ago on Nov. 9, 2024, plus 2 active Zumwalt class destroyers, plus 9 active Ticonderoga cruisers. So as of early last month there were 73 active AB's, plus 2 Zum's = 75. So the #75 in the video is pretty accurate for destroyers only, and of course they forgot to list the 9 cruisers, which btw all of them are to be decommissioned by 2029 starting with the first ones in 2027. I have a feeling they might extend the Ticonderogas' service, because they had counted on 20 new Constellation class frigates being delivered by 2029 to replace these old cruisers. The fact is the Constellation FFG-X program is running years behind schedule, as is the new DDG-X program, so it will be interesting to see if they will still retire all 9 cruisers by 2029, and also if they start decommissioning the old Flight I/II Arleigh Burke's in 2030 as scheduled, since not all the Constellation frigates will be ready (if any with all the design changes they are still making). The only good news is we are still building new & improved/more advanced Flight III Arleigh Burke destroyers.
@johnroberts99229 сағат бұрын
There are no surprises in this video. Not one.
@steamboatstorm915817 сағат бұрын
In the future It will be France leading the NATO Alliance once Trump pulls USA out, Viva la Francia!! 🇲🇫 💪 🇮🇹 From your Italian brother.
@r.d.paolis14 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂
@r.d.paolis13 сағат бұрын
E Allora siamo a posto .la marina francese ha una portaerei che sta 6 mesi all ' anno ferma x riparazione .forse in questo momento e ' addirittura inferiore a quella italiana .leggiti le riviste francesi del settore .😂
@antoinehuguet51058 сағат бұрын
@@r.d.paolisjust take more informations, everything you said is bullshit.
@vtecharrys.69818 сағат бұрын
I don't know about that, but their new more advanced FREMM destroyers they are building, and FDI frigates (1 is undergoing sea and operational trails and they will get 5 FDI's total), plus new Sub's under construction, is an indication that France might have the biggest/strongest Navy after the US by 2030. Italy is also building up their Navy as well, so in the least Italy and France will be the 2 big naval powers in Europe. Germany doesn't even have as many warships as Greece and has fallen greatly behind, and so has the UK's Navy which has run out of money. In other Navy comparison articles they have Germany at like #9 or #10, UK #7 or 8 I believe, and the Greek Navy #5, but I think that's purely going by the number of vessels, not their quality, firepower or age.
@ilmaio6 сағат бұрын
Trump will not pull America out of Nato, Italian navy is much superior to France's. Two carriers and F35 VTOL 5th generation. France has 1 old carrier and no 5th generation jet fighters. The Rafale is 4th generation and lacks interoperability. Why you make videos about topics you know nothing about?
@theo-i5s9g12 сағат бұрын
BUT TURKEY HAVE GREAT DRONES
@michsky468 сағат бұрын
they proved to be useless in REAL WAR
@vtecharrys.69818 сағат бұрын
Drones that were all shot down in the Russia-Ukraine war in the first month or 2. Even the Libyans shot down a bunch of Turkish drones. The Bayraktar variants are too big and slow and easily shot down by any country that has anti-air capabilities. This is why the Ukrainians are using the much smaller and cheaper commercial drones (to drop small munitions like 100-120mm mortar) that are virtually undetectable and hard to shoot down. Even a few of the big expensive US drones like Predator and Reaper have been shot down. Turkish drones are good only for attacking low-tech forces that have no anti-air defense capabilities.
@michsky468 сағат бұрын
@@vtecharrys.6981 well explained
@Ezekiel9033 сағат бұрын
drones,you know they are used since the 90s? bcs Turkey send a few Bayraktar drones as publicity to Ukraine it means nothing! Inform yourself about other drones, like Italian F35 and their drones that fly beside the jet, every pilot has the control over it, Norwegian drones, so tiny like a paperplane, 10 cm long, it starts from the hand, Swedish one, US ones, German ones etc.etc. etc.
@ΜΙάκωβος12 сағат бұрын
🇬🇷🇬🇷
@parmentier7457Сағат бұрын
The flag that was shown at the Netherlands is wrong. The blue flag is from the Dutch government and ministries. The Netherlands has its own naval flag.
@farmerfeuerfalke14 сағат бұрын
Now what was the surprise?
@JaroslavPesl-i1w14 сағат бұрын
EU and Nato is super.
@yusufay643710 сағат бұрын
Some of the numbers are wrong turkey have 17 frigate not 16 and 13 submarine not 12
@SlimNesbitt-p6s14 сағат бұрын
This attitude is of course very theoretical. The strength of the navy is of course also dependent on the length of the coast that it has to defend. This mainly affects the patrol boats. In some countries, the patrol boats do not belong to the navy but to the coast guard, which is subordinate to the navy in the event of war. There are also sometimes serious differences in the armament, age and shipyard times of the frigates and destroyers.
@vtecharrys.69817 сағат бұрын
I agree, but here they are including patrol boats that are also guided missile boats, and NOT Coast Guard boats. Many of the countries rated here have well armed missile boats in their Navy carrying anti-ship Exocet or Harpoon missiles, plus torpedoes for anti-submarine warfare. For ex. the majority of the Greek Navy's 30+ "partrol boats" are actually heavily armed fast guided missile boats which have all the aforementioned armament, plus RIM-116 with 21 anti-air RAM missiles, 76mm main gun(s), plus 30mm or 40mm cannons, etc. They are actually 60+ meter long small Corvettes. All that weaponry and their purpose is usually NOT the Coast Guard's responsibility. So if you noticed in the video the "patrol boats" were not categorized or broken down, but all grouped together, and they fairly accurately list the vessels that are part of the country's Navy only, not their Coast Guard's. All the countries included in the video with a coast line also have a Coast guard with separate, less armed vessels. Greece for ex. has several hundred Coast Guard vessels due their extensive coast line and hundreds of islands.
@SlimNesbitt-p6s6 сағат бұрын
@@vtecharrys.6981Thank you for the informative answer
@LOLOVAL-os3pq11 сағат бұрын
et en bâtiment d'importance , on a aussi le premier des 4 BRF , navires presque aussi long que nos PHA ( 199 m ) avec 194 m de long ! on a Le Monge , navire radar , il sert pour la poursuite des tests de missile M51 mais il peut très bien être mis quelque part , et servir comme système de détection , il a 2 antennes radars ARMOR de 50 tonnes , capable de suivre une pièce métallique de 20 mm à 800 km ! je doute qu'aucun avion ennemi puisse s'approcher sans être détecté ! il mesure 230 mètres de long , donc loin d'une petite unité ! on a aussi le navire espion , le Dupuy-de -Lome , de 101 m de long ! on a 21 frégates , 17 patrouilleurs de tout type , 3 bâtiments de ravitaillement = 1 BRF et la SOMME et la MARNE , 8 navires de soutien , 4 bâtiments hydrographiques , 13 chasseurs de mines , et d'autres types de navire !
@valeriodesantis988114 сағат бұрын
sono sorpreso dalla grecia un paese povero con un pil basso è ben armato
@TheTRELOS712 сағат бұрын
Because Greece neighboring turkey an aggressive state, not neighboring with Switzerland and France.
@GermanGreetings6 сағат бұрын
The Music... 11:00 min. like this ? I had to leave Your Video 👀
@LDG89613 сағат бұрын
Greek Navy , Aspides protector 🇬🇷🇨🇾🇮🇱🇪🇺
@brunoiotti352216 сағат бұрын
WaltDisney:....garadinuoto
@paulsandford33456 сағат бұрын
Lets be honest, the rest of NATO should have an armed force of at least equivalent or higher than the US combined, but it doesn't. Why?
@TomModeste4 сағат бұрын
I guess because the deal was we buy their stuff and they play world police
@markthomson21756 сағат бұрын
People always underestimate our British forces these days because of numbers etc, make no mistake we're still the best and always will be 🇬🇧
@FilipEhn14 сағат бұрын
the swedish navy is not the right name for the swedish navy. right name is the swedish marine.
@tuncbilek8412 сағат бұрын
Önemli değil zaten yok hükmünde bir devletsiniz. Boşuna koruyoruz sizi. Yanlış olsun önemli değil.
@burstcity383210 сағат бұрын
Really? that's good to know.
@craigwiester91775 сағат бұрын
Why does this need that insipid music?
@sampouuksulainen21418 сағат бұрын
Armi että. kiina ei pääse natoon olen siitä aika surullinen😢
@days9275 сағат бұрын
China?
@koookooo-ww8kv21 сағат бұрын
Hi ❤ I'm W H C
@blakeps1924 сағат бұрын
Canada doesn't have a navy, army or air force.
@davidbeed23653 сағат бұрын
What? Well what do we spend 26 Billion a year on? Ottawa?
@martok196614 сағат бұрын
👍👍😉
@theo-i5s9g12 сағат бұрын
THERE IS NO WAY ON EARTH GREECE RANKS 8 AND TURKEY RANKS 5 DO YOUR HOME WORK GREECE HAVE BOUGHT 4 FRENCH BELLHARA FRIGATES THERE THE BEST IN THE WORLD AND GREECE ARE BUYING 8 CORVETTES AND 2 NEW SUBS TURKEY HAS OLD OUTDATED NAVY GET IT RIGHT BRO
@burstcity383210 сағат бұрын
The best Frigates are not the French ones, lol.
@yusufay643710 сағат бұрын
Greece doesnt have a defenece industry while turkey build their own warships and submarines
@antoinehuguet51058 сағат бұрын
@@burstcity3832french frigates are among the best. Just read à little you would be less ridiculous
@Easypeasy55587 сағат бұрын
Its a video about current strength and not ships that will come at some point and by the way, Turkey is currently building 2 corvettes, 7 frigates and 5 submarines. The first TF-2000 destroyer will also be added this year (built). Please don't get me wrong but every person knows that Greece has no chance against Turkey 7.5 billion vs 40.6 billion defense budget. And Turkey also builds a lot of things themselves, which means they don't depend on anyone for spare parts and ammunition. That can't be said about Greece.
@giampietrodelmaschio34159 сағат бұрын
Un sacco di soldi sprecati.
@marcelinosanchez43234 сағат бұрын
Il giorno che te atacano un pazzo, mai piu dirai questo
@Paraskevas7412 сағат бұрын
German Navy overrated
@kadiraybasti41729 сағат бұрын
No TÜV no tested....
@michsky468 сағат бұрын
same like turkish
@EzequielCanoramirez13 сағат бұрын
😂😂
@metehangokturk969611 сағат бұрын
@MAXIMUSLOK We are not cooperating with Iran, on the contrary, we have different political views. And about Russia, we have 500 years of history with Russia and we do not cooperate with them either. Yes, we have economic relations with Russia, just like the USA and the EU, everything is under the radar. No Russian warship is allowed to cross the straits (Bosphorus & Dardanelles), just as Russian military airplanes are not allowed to use Turkish air sovereignty. The USA is the real rogue state and NATO ( North Atlantic Terror Organization ) is its instrument. Look at the history of the last 75 years, this rogue state has had its dirty fingers all over the world (Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Panama, Cuba, Nicaragua, Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador ...). Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya ... etc ). The IMF, World Bank and other organizations founded by the USA have exploited most countries for decades, initiated military coups, carried out assassinations, started civil wars ... and then they presume to judge other countries.
@stucco7610 сағат бұрын
Can i ask you why compete with us??Thats obsession...nothing against Turkish people..
@metehangokturk96969 сағат бұрын
@@stucco76 Who are you? Why and why should I compete with you? You need to be a little more specific.
@metehangokturk96969 сағат бұрын
@@stucco76 ... now I've seen it, you're Greek 😉Jassas my young friend.
@zak833212 сағат бұрын
BIG MISTAKES SHIT WY DONT TELL Anadolu and Spanish Juan Carlos are twinses
@michsky468 сағат бұрын
is bakery and kebab corner the anadolu
@Platonnich22 сағат бұрын
где Россия и Китай ???
@olilor177322 сағат бұрын
On parle de l'OTAN pauvre rigolo
@Sandman25321 сағат бұрын
LOL Not even in NATO
@Mrspeedy.997220 сағат бұрын
NATO ? 🙄🤔🤣🤣🤣🤷♂️
@MAXIMUSLOK18 сағат бұрын
Russia: sunken on the black sea China sunken on port's 😂😂😂😂
@met71metaldetector5517 сағат бұрын
Half of Russia is under the sea, while China is busy copying Western ships in poor quality 😄 The Russians hold a perhaps unbeatable world record, that of having half their fleet sunk by a country without a navy.
@chinomartinez96427 сағат бұрын
Ni haci le ganan a Rusia
@marcelinosanchez43234 сағат бұрын
No la atacan por el mar ni con todos los medios de la otan, para mi, china es mucha mas peligrosa que rusia