Vedanta and Tantra Kashmir Shaivism | A Dialog Between Philosophies

🔻Instagram
/ vsiitk
🔻WhatsApp
To Subscribe Send ‘Yes’ on WhatsApp: [phone]
🔻KZbin
/ vsiitk
Please share this with your friends!

[@Lotuseye]

A beautiful discussion indeed! Even Shankara does express a more creative vision of non-duality in his more poetic modes, consider for example Vivekachudamani 521: ब्रह्मप्रत्ययसन्ततिर्जगदतो ब्रह्मैव तत्सर्वतः And, of course in late texts like the Dakshinamurti Stotra मायावीव विजृम्भयत्यपि महायोगीव यः स्वेच्छया (v. 2). This would technically fall under Upasana, and be related to the conception of Ishvara rather than that of Brahman as such, a distinction brought out for example in Mandukya 6 and 7. Thank you, a wonderful and enlightening discussion!

[@ashishkedkar6095]

It's Great to hear both, really Kashmiri shaivisam is infinite ocean .and Advaita Vedanta too.🙏Jay Swami Vivekananda ,Om Namha Shivay🙏

[@pappus99]

How fortunate i feel to have listened to this wonderful beings. My pranams with gratitude.

[@ramenchakrabarti4028]

To give a comment on this talk is very difficult. Hinduism is described and explained in many ways. This is the higher end of the description. On the other hand I can be a Hindu without going through these difficult and complex studies but just by following the simple rituals. Most of us follow the easier path but want to hear the complex part also. So who wants to learn the complexity this is one of the great talks.

[@tattvamasmi]

I feel myself the happiest jiva (still jiva but happiest) in the world, because i have listened this talk of two amazingly great and humble teachers in the world!!! 1) Amazing discussion which discovers all sides of two main philosophies; 2) lovely respect and humble attitude between two teachers; 3) stable and accomodative, cristal clear platform for people of all religions to grow and discover divinity within! I have learned a lot about philosophies, but even more - from humble and respective attitude of my teachers. My life is very successful because i have met such acaryas, such philosophies, such mood, what else a person can desire if he had found what he had been looking for lives?!....

[@billyranger2627]

What a beautiful way to have a conversation. 2 souls who can easily walk past heaven. Their destination is much higher

[@NetiNeti25920]

Eternally grateful to Swami Sarvapriyananda ji. It is because of this very talk that I delved into the depths of non duality and Kashmir Shavism. You are indeed the second coming of Swami Vivekananda ji The biggest revelation for me so far on the journey has been Saivacarya Sthaneshwar Timalsina ji. What a treasure. Truly unbound! Joy Thakur ji Joy Maa ji Joy Swami ji 💐💝

[@kamalshetty2545]

When two waves from the ocean of knowledge come together its pure bliss. Thousand thanks to both of you...

[@tanyasharadamba1264]

Well said🙏🏼

[@chandrareddy2790]

I am more and more enamored by the vastness of Sanatana dharma 🙏🏼

[@WhiteKnightLord]

And when we remember these two are just two schools .

[@HinduPhoenix]

​@@WhiteKnightLordyeah but these two are the greatest or we can say the only real philosophy of Vedas..

[@jason6360]

I love Vedanta. But now I love Kashmir Shaivism to.

[@tanyasharadamba1264]

Absolutely Extraordinary discourse!!!🤩😍 "The keys 🔑 to Brahmagyanadam are in the hands 🤲🏾of the Divine Mother" Goddess 👸🏿💖💞🥭🍎🍈🍊🌹🌺💐💐💐💐💐🙇🏼‍♀️

[@kaleyjanenigh]

Jai Ma!

[@Ratz5356]

After hearing the discusssion I feel like advaita vedanta and kashmiri shaivisam start as two loops of infinity symbol and coincide in between. Same with all sanatan philosophies, schools of thought & traditions. The co inciding point is that ultimatum which we all strive for.

[@tanyasharadamba1264]

I could listen to the continuation of this discussion daily. Jai Gurus🌹🙏🏼💕🤲🏽

[@vikramrazdan5680]

Awakening the Kundalini is an key objective in Kashmir Shaivism. We had quite a few Bubs (Sants) in Kashmir before 1990, who had extra-sensory powers after years of upaya/mantras/tapasya in awakening the Kundalini. Onse such sant (Nandlal Bub) could read the other person's mind. I have seen him do that...its unbelievable.

[@Chairman_LmaoZedong]

Everything is lost now, militancy in kashmir destroyed everything. 😢

[@rickdeckard1075]

wish tapasya would be discussed in more detail

[@rediscoveringhinduism]

Where can I find more information on these practices to awaken kundalini?

[@vikramrazdan5680]

@@rediscoveringhinduism Google Swami Lakshman Joo; there are a series of videos recorded including on kundalini-vigyan-rahaysam, also gives mantras.

[@andreasrylander]

@@rediscoveringhinduism Be careful with that.

[@jacobfraser1238]

This has been uploaded a few time but I love sooo I'll watch it again🤭🙏😊

[@kaviammu5104]

Watch the channel Raakammu- art of connecting dots--- it's a traditional Indian Art

[@vasukinagabhushan]

Brilliant discussions about great Vedanta and Shakta Darshanas. 🙏🏼👏

[@jayasrivastava6976]

Absolutely wonderful discussion. Really fortunate to be able to hear these great masters. Thank you for the opportunity.🙏🏻

[@somnathbose7455]

beauty of Bharatiya philosophy...this is the real essence ...inspite of primarily focussig on different schools of thoughts, being genuinely sincere in understanding as well as dedicating work to the other schools of thought and merging it at common points

[@vasukinagabhushan]

Shadows are reflections of Real objects. Vedantins argue that our concept of world is Maya, like confusing rope for snake. For any confusions to occur, there should have been the concept of a real snake before. So, the nature or Prakruti is Not Unreal, as many Vedantin followers claimed. In reality, Prakruti is eternal as stated by Kapila in Saankhya Sutras.

[@ankitchaubey1293]

The bramha is the snake and rope is just vibration of bramha

[@cxzaq21]

What you consider as real is not more than name and form superimposed on Brahma. Thus when you say a tree is real, it is just a name and form which you have superimposed on Brahma out of your ignorance.

[@cxzaq21]

@@ankitchaubey1293 Brahma doesn't vibrate

[@ayushmaandey4665]

@@cxzaq21 who superimposes if none save Brahman exists?

[@davidmickles5012]

The division between the real and the unreal is itself an illusion. Brahman is the real-ization of this, but if Brahman becomes an object (a conceptual appearance to an awareness) then it is not real and not actually Brahman. Brahman is the *expression* of Brahman, Shiva is the *expression* of Shiva, God is the EXPRESSION of God and YOU are the EXPRESSION of YOU. This is why enlightenment is in the BODY (as per Hatha Yoga, Pranayam, Kundalini, Tantra etc) and not simply a "mental" experience.

[@jacobjonker6218]

When looking into the diamond, the infinite and infinitely changing facets disappear.. These two are close, but Shaivism bridges the duality of the ground of being while Advaita contradicts itself. A teaching which holds that the emanations of Consciousness are not real cancels itself. Emptiness and Form are One. If there is no Form, it is still enfolded in Emptiness. Plain truth.

[@QED_]

Also: not all Emanations/Forms are ontologically the same. Some are more Real than others, which is useful to realize. Advaita makes it harder to do that by lumping them all together as un-Real . . .

[@JonasAnandaKristiansson]

Wonderful.. "imagine" this having millions of views.. THIS is the REAL DEAL of life.

[@Ekam-Sat]

Right…

[@Atah-Bharatah]

Wat ever said and done i have never seen any one more articulate teacher than swami sarvapriyananda ❤❤❤

[@shonalisarkar]

Woooh😲 it's loads of knowledge in a single session. Mind feed 😇

[@Gagarin8294]

Where do i get the chant: Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya?? Please..let me know..this is pure bliss.. thank you in advance..!

[@lauramartinezcalderon8487]

Thank you very very very much for this Wonderfull video, conversation, opportunity .... extraordinary 🙏

[@azarialeroux5139]

Swami Just whatever question I whisper to the cosmos it shows me that you have already answered. Thank you Swami Ji.

[@vikramrazdan5680]

The only difference between Advaita and Kashmiri Trika Shaivism is on reality and perception. In Advaita, Brahman is the reality and Prakriti is the perception, whereas in Kashmiri Shaivism, both the Brahman and Prakriti are reality as part of Purusha (Shiva).

[@mansinghdeshmukh9355]

I completely agree... And so excepting both the Purusha and Prakriti gives me a wholesome way to live life as a whole, whereas, accepting Brahman as the only reality and the rest of everything else as Maya takes me towards vairagya which cannot be the life anymore. Then the purpose of my seeking Brahman and integrating this truth as the only reality of my life and renouncing everything else as Maya could also be argued to be an act of Maya itself (false). I do accept the core principle of Advaita of "Aham Bramhas mi" and so is every other being and every other object around me and this whole existence is Brahman. And thus this experience that we call our life, what I contemplate is just an infinitesimally small of the entireness of Brahman. At my level, I might give size and time to it, but at the level of all-encompassing and only existing Brahman, there exists no definition of either space or time. Even this thought and feeling that I experience at this moment is also the manifestation (play) of the ultimate Brahman (the one) who plays (their dance) as the duality of Shiv and Shakti. That would be my humble submission...

[@skjakirhossain3318]

Could you name some books from which I can search kashmir shaivism.?

[@psroutine7132]

​@@mansinghdeshmukh9355maya isn't false or illusion

[@Chase_Istre]

@@mansinghdeshmukh9355This is a good view. As long as we are embodied in the idea of ego, of “I”, it is not right to say “I Am That”. Rejecting all of the world as maya also can lead to more confusion rather than clarity which is the heart of spiritual results. Sri Ramakrishna says when one attains knowledge it is like this: It is like when a man walks up the stairs to the roof of the house, once he is at the top he realizes that the roof and the stairs were all made of the same brick material. First through the process of Neti Neti, the Jnani rejects all that is transient and then comes unto Brahman. Then he realizes that all of this world is but God himself pervading it all and the world is infinitely adorable and wholesome. Why reject the world Thakur asks? This too is all God. Just do not become entangled by lust and greed. For those are the clouds which cover the sun keeping the lotus from blooming.

[@AmitMagnet]

​@@psroutine7132Completely agree with you world is not false it exists but its interpretation in our poorly developed intellect is errorneous hence false...

[@amiraarora3363]

Absolutely Great 🙏🏻

[@vasukinagabhushan]

*Different Names for God & Universe* in Different Indian Philosophies. *Saankhya:* Purushas & Prakruti *Vaisheshika:* Purusha & Prakruti *Nyaya:* Purusha & Prakruti *Shaiva:* Shiva & Shakti *Meemaamsa:* No Brahma & Jagat *Advaita Vedanta:* Brahma & Maaya *Vishistaadwaita Vedanta:* Brahma & Leela *Dwaita Vedanta:* Brahma & Jeevaatma *Bauddha:* Nirvaana & Shoonya *Jina:* Arihant & Loka *Lokaayata:* No Param/Atma & Jagat 🙏🏽🙏🏿🙏🏼

[@VijayRamnathkar-h5o]

Sara

[@kishorekumar5918]

wow...what a great insight on Adwaitha and kashmir saivism by both eminent scholars.

[@sushmitachakraborty2540]

😢💦😥😭👏🙏🏻👏🙏🏻👏🙏🏻👏🙏🏻প্রণাম জয় শ্রীরাধারাণী জয় শ্রীকৃষ্ণ বাসুদেবায় নম।ওম নম শ্রীভগবতে শ্রীরামকৃষ্ণায় তে নম🌷🌹🌼🌻💐🍀😢💦😥😭👏🙏🏻👏🙏🏻👏🙏🏻👏

[@MysticVokkai]

I hadn't heard of Kashmir Shivaism until a week ago, though I had studied the philosophy of the Bhagavad Gita. Before that, i had studied the western philosophies pertaining to the reality of sense objects. I personally settled on the perspective that sense objects are in the least how we experience them; i.e. a "tree" is a tree, even if the idea of a "tree" is an invention of the mind. Correct me if im wrong, but the concept of Maya seems very similar to the idea that a "tree" is a tree. In studying the philosophy behind the Bhagavad Gita, I could make sense of almost everything, except of the perspective that Maya was not inherently real. Once I learned of Kashmir Shivaism and its perspective of Maya actually being reality, it instantly clicked with my previous perspectives. Needless to say, I am incredibly thankful for these great minds coming together to discuss these topics. God bless them both and every one here with us

[@Motus-id2yt]

Read Radhanath Phukan's version of the sankhya karika. But basically, our intellectual determination of reality, as opposed to the experience of the jiva under which lies the true reality, where the former is a less perfect truth and the latter a complete truth - think of it first as hegelian dialectics, one determination is sublated by a determination which is truer than it where the newer determination contains the earlier determination as well, and then ultimately we will have absolute truth, the absolute objective, as opposed to the subjective objective (experience subject to the intellectual condition of the jiva). This talk was very little philosophy, the guest was interesting though as someone just starting to look into Kashmir Saivism.

[@thetransferaccount4586]

a nice conversation.. but the skill of speaking is clearly coming into display

[@sherrysyed]

The way sir Timalsina recites abhinavagupta 🧡

[@chakrabortysoumen5]

Wow, what a holy chance to hear this....

[@jacobfraser1238]

Hey check out the law of one, A Mazing, same as this wow, explains why Tesla love vivekananda 👌that and the emerald tablets go hand in hand, good work Shankara ur great!!!!!!!

[@dinoveiga9406]

Great conversation. A wonder what would swamiji Sarvapriananda would say about the Donald Hoffman’s Consciousness Agent?

[@kamleshbagrecha7957]

Feel like multiple ways to the same point. You need to get yours. Felt like coming from higher chakras to lower one's intellectual way. From lower to higher with all methods etc. So different type of evolved personalities seen. I may be wrong. Thank you for the discussion. Always helpful and elevating to listen to such gurus swami sarvapriyananda dr tamalsina 🙏🙏🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🙏🙏

[@rg7980]

My first encounter with KS is wanderful and illuminating.

[@tanyasharadamba1264]

"She doesn't like to be talked about" 🤩😍😂💖💖💖🌺🌹🥭🙇🏼‍♀️

[@BHALAMAN]

Believe in Advaita, but practice Tantra. One is practical, other is nihilistic. One is life affirming, other is life renouncing.

[@QED_]

"Believe in Advaita, but practice Tantra. The latter is practical, the former is nihilistic. The latter is life affirming, the former is life renouncing."

[@sukhenbarman7056]

Very relevant lecture. Really I Enjoyed the entire session

[@vivalanovus]

Hilarious cosmic conversation like two gods debating the same point they agree upon

[@rajendraraval7852]

Vedanta and Kashmiri Shaivism are so integrated that it is very difficult to seperate both. Sarvam khalvidam Shiv/Bramh.

[@tonytigertwenty]

From the top of the mountain one sees all paths.

[@QED_]

"The view from the top of a mountain is *non-duality.* You can either *(A)* fly a plane to the top (Advaita) . . . or *(B)* climb to the top (Tantra). In *(A)* you have to find a plane (sadhana), learn how to fly it, risk crashing because of lack of skill or bad weather or mechanical failure, etc. In *(B)* you have to learn various mountaineering skills (upaya), learn how to read maps (mandalas) and a compass, risk getting lost or altitude sickness or frost bite , etc."

[@sherrysyed]

Anf the other two equally adorable swamis too 🧡🧡

[@sethshams]

If i try to understand , Advaita seems to underline the reality of Brahman as himself in himself with himself with or without manifestation , and Kashmir shaivism insists on Brahman being free and enjoying freedom by creating a manifold of himself, that is certainly not contradictory, advaita is true when Brahman is thinking of himself and kashmir shaivism is true when he enjoys manifestation, as a human being can involves himself in what he is doing and still knows that he is not what he is doing

[@QED_]

He *is* what he is doing. Being and doing are the same . . .

[@sethshams]

if you say that it is like saying what he is doing never ends, if he is busy at being then his being never ends ? @@QED_

[@edwardwheeler197]

Trika sounds like Kabbalah to me

[@e.h.5849]

It would be of benfit to the larger Shakta community, if Sthaneswhwar Timalsina, Sarvapriyananda and Rajarshi Nandi had a discussion together. Rajarshi has a really great outlook on great many things and is very much in the picture, where he could be an asset to discussions as this one. However, I'd like to see him reconcile the nondual and beyond oneness with his notion of strict plurality - it just seems his notion of ''polytheism'' is not the same thing as this super-integrative view that S. Timalsina is presenting. I don't sense any flaw in the view here. One can't keep proclaiming separate identities of devatas over and over, without arriving to some unifying conclusion. the Supreme transcends the nondual and dual, multiplicity and singularity. the very principle of samavesha abidance is beynd conceptual, just like in Vedanta. Having said that, samavesha won't even occur if the view is not fixed and maintained, regardless how much ritualism and incense burning is performed...

[@Justacommentor777]

I think that rajarshy nandi would agree with the non dual conclusion. I don't think his belief in the existence of multiple deities is contradictory to non dualism of Kashmiri shaivism because he once said that everything, even the deities are forms created out of Adi Shakti, and that Shakti is of Shiva (consciousness).

[@candacen7477]

So wonderful. Thank you.

[@iloverumi]

great topic and talk

[@MaithiliKulkarni]

Epic!!!!🙏🙏🙏

[@TheGuiltsOfUs]

Trika subscribes to a very similar ontology as us, though we don't converse much. An Advaitin responds more to a Viśiṣṭādvaita and Dvaita since we all agree about Vedic authority, while Shaivas are more engaged in polemics with other Shaiva traditions.

[@saikumar-ds7vt]

Saiva aagamas Rudra aagamas Bhairava aagamas where does all these leads to ?? who can differentiate ? who is asking questions ? Who is answering those questions ? How does one know the answers ? existence want to know ,want to experience itself through many ways ... until next breathe cease!!! Until next thought cease!!!! Ooommmmmmmm ...,. .

[@swetas4010]

Knowledge is humility 🙏❤️🙏

[@Ekam-Sat]

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:34-35).

[@hemantwankhade1906]

The principle Sat is but it is beyond comprehension and perception ,the moment one reach near to that and can project some idea about it at the best of his capacity .But the moment he comes in contact with Sat he will never exist to explain it and becomes that Sat,Anirvachaniya.Chit is the experience of state of Is,the state of very being with its limiting boundaries of independent existence and Aananda is again an independent of both Sat and Chit and witnessing the existence of both .The experience of Satchichidanand (sat,chit and Aananda)at once ,a state of constant bliss can not be attained without Guru(like Shiva, who has initiated his linage of Nath ,Machchindra Nath,Goraksh Nath ,Gahininath,Nivruttinath,Jnandev,Eknath,etc) only this lineage is authorized to bestow upon the BODH (Shaktipaat) to a qualified disciple of their order and it is not a play of an intellectual gymnastics ,self made Guru and everybody's cup of tea .The details of Guru - Disciple lineage can be understood by Navnath Litreture followed by the Warkari Lineage led by Sant Jnaneshwar Maharaj who has given the Bodh to the yogi Changdev whose age was1400 years having all tantrik siddhis (occult power) still he was ignorant of the strength of Divine existence ,it was possible only when he surrendered to Shri Jnaneshvar Maharaj.Please read the charitra of all the sant lineage in Maharashtra and other parts of world they are the embodiment of all vedas and upnishads, tantra and beyond,rather We can say they are Nitya Avatar of Lord Vishnu.

[@vasukinagabhushan]

Shravana, Manana, Nidhi Dhyasana are stages of all learning and not limited to Adwaita Vedanta.

[@LiveToTheFullestNet]

Simply FAB !!

[@bhavanigul2332]

Both the systems have been there from the beginning and the end objective in both the systems is the same.The tantric practices do give faster results for the intermediate necessities.Each person has the choice to select his own way. There is no point in comparing both the systems. They are only complimentary to each other

[@pijushguha5484]

Nice to hear the talk

[@Mercurygamer72]

Anyone here from Nepal

[@eus8964]

Haami dui jaana maatrai ho jasto chha

[@Mercurygamer72]

@@eus8964 kaafi xum hami :D where u from?

[@eus8964]

@@Mercurygamer72 janma okhaldhunga haal amerika. How about you?

[@Mercurygamer72]

@@eus8964 mero ilam. Hajurko subha naam ?

[@swamirameshwarananda8276]

Many Many Thanks

[@a.u.j6340]

The real shloka from Vedas is om namoh bhagwate rudraye namah.

[@Ekam-Sat]

All is Self…

[@Arpita1106]

জয় শ্রী কৃষ্ণ 🙏

[@JetFlash512MB]

What is the view of distinguished speaker on Sri Sri Anandmurthy Ji's (Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar) teachings , since his preaching's are on Tantra and Advaitam and Bhakti

[@vasukinagabhushan]

Saankhya seems scientific.

[@philosopher8052]

So veranda and kashmiri shaivism are to major philosophies in indian?

[@xXKillaBGXx]

Ultimate reality is sunyata (emptiness).

[@drprtk2904]

Even then that emptiness is still something, right? It's not the same emptiness as my empty pocket.

[@laika5757]

A True Prophet of our times. God bless him. 🎶🎶🎶

[@SelfSeeker]

We don’t have system of prophets, they are Sadhakas or practitioners. Any one can experience this with efforts and blessing of guru 🙏

[@joelcodina4636]

Thank you

[@DrAyyappanThangavel]

Amazing

[@DivyaPrakash1]

Is it so that Prabhu Ramkrishna and Vivekananda practised themselves the tantric way and prescribed their less mortal followers to stick to the more logical option of Adwaita?

[@DivyaPrakash1]

We have stories of initiation of Ramkrishna by Totapuri maharaj and of Vivekanand by Ramkishna by touch followed by strong divine experiences by no followers, so far I know, has come up with similar account!! please explain!

[@DivyaPrakash1]

I think Swami ji was more worried about the poor state of our country, and he wanted a monkish devotion in serving people and thus started this order, more for "Jagatanam Hitay ch".

[@SelfSeeker]

Shri RK suggested vedant path to swami Ji due to his personality and abilities, but he also said that don’t think that Bhakti math is not true. Swami Ji himself turned to ma kali in later year for his personal practices

[@BHALAMAN]

Tantra is life affirming, experience based, practical. Radical Advaita is life renouncing, nihilistic, impractical. So believe in Advaita, but practice Tantra. 🎉

[@thakurprasad9609]

Where is Vedanta and Kashmir Shaivism in Kashmir today in real life?

[@WhiteKnightLord]

Could anyone tell me where can I find the recitation of prayer in the beginning

[@gautampk]

Pavamana Mantra, there is a wikipedia article with translations

[@WhiteKnightLord]

@@gautampk Thanks for reply but I wanted to know about that Om Namo Bhagwate audio like is there separate link to that whether video or audio. This exact version.🙏

[@AdvDheerajChaudhary]

As Per Vedanta ..After Moksha Do Atma Again Appear In Life Form As Human Or Any Other For...Or It Never Again Takes Birth....? Arya Samaj Scholars Gives Explaination That After 36 Crores Something Year Atmas Have To Gain Take Birth... I Have Doubt Over This..If Again After This Birth Is Going To Be..Then Why To Take Moskha N Enjoy The Life...Plz My Question Is Deep..Plz Answer.

[@akb3656]

Jab koi janm he nhi leta to marega kaise... MANDUKYA padhiye Tatumashi se Tatuadarshi

[@AdvDheerajChaudhary]

@@akb3656 I m talking about birth as human being

[@akb3656]

@@AdvDheerajChaudhary Still confused with name and form, Drigh Drishta Viveka... U have still not understood

[@AdvDheerajChaudhary]

@@akb3656 Yes sir i have not.

[@akb3656]

@@AdvDheerajChaudhary Turiyam, Tatwamashi, Aham Brahmasmi, the sound of silence, the one which is purely subjective cannot be objectified, u can see things but u cannot see ur eyes, the language of paradox, study the above u will start understanding.

[@jaikrishanparimoo3969]

Lively.

[@shivasmight369]

Om Namah Shivaya

[@amiraarora3363]

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@joachimluft4501]

WOW thx

[@anushkadate7636]

Superrrrb

[@13varunp65]

I personally think spirituality should never be made a philosophy or an academic subject because then it's only an intellectual subject without any experiential understanding. when there is no experiential understanding then only wild imagination and misunderstanding can take place and one will only be full of words.

[@mounikasampangi3589]

Philosophy is also a part of spirituality. “Gnana”

[@abhaskumarsinha3647]

Philosophy on purpose of life, self and practice is spirituality.

[@sujatabanerjee7049]

🙏🙏🙏

[@vikramrazdan5680]

There are 77 Agamas in Kashmir Shaivism.

[@prasannnakumarkumar2149]

92...

[@waldwassermann]

So what I realize is that Tantra and Christianity actually say the same thing. The purpose of diversity is love. Blessings.

[@allensnea9335]

No. They are very different

[@Eezzy108]

What means Vedanta vs Kashmiri shaivism Is this football match 🤦‍♂️

[@sonujain1086]

❤❤❤❤❤

[@debella379]

🙏🏼

[@vasukinagabhushan]

"Temporary man declaring that the eternal infinite universe as unreal" is philosophically and intellectually dishonest, with all due respect to Vedanta scholars. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

[@Ra-xp5rg]

🙏

[@vasukinagabhushan]

This universe is infinite. How can the infinite universe be unreal?

[@jacobfraser1238]

Beacuse it's material/ physical / maya/ devil material universe is finite, unlike the self

[@cristianj.6080]

@@jacobfraser1238 Why do you differentiate between the Self and the objective universe? What is their relationship, and through what ways do they differ? Who and what ‘entity’ differs this in first place?

[@Jay-tu9vf]

How do you know it is infinite? And what is it precisely that is infinite? Space?

[@PodGlimpse3625]

Do u guys belive that universe is expanding?

[@vasukinagabhushan]

​@@Chairman_LmaoZedongSpace itself expanding. Scientific observations point to the infinite universe.

[@Anonymous-ed8vy]

26:00

[@vc6477]

1000 likes..

[@hemantwankhade1906]

Dr. You are talking unprepared ,and bombing on audience what has been accumulated since long time randomly,there is no system of delivery and logical sequencing of content ,only monologue style delivery .Hence finding difficulty what you want to say exactly.

[@dhurjati1387]

Imp

[@vijairahaman100]

Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina. He is not a good speaker at all. Podcast should have gotten someone else. He just speaks word salad, apart from his terrible accent.

[@californiamonster8877]

You know Buddha played a Siddhi of instruments In resonance Only to then make Buddhism Buddhism is clearly a sect of musical tantric Kashmir self recognition

[@nagendraprasadpidikiti7040]

🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@tattwamasi8613]

🙏🙏🙏