The CX-90 Turbo Premium Plus is also just over $50K so would be a closer price comparison to the Honda. The Premium Plus adds power folding mirrors, a 360 camera, heated and ventilated front seats, heated center row captain's chairs and a heated steering wheel. The seats are upgraded to Nappa leather, the gauge cluster is upgraded to a 12.3-inch digital display and the infotainment is now a 12.3-inch screen as well. A 110-watt power outlet and 12-volt outlet are in the rear cargo area.
@MichaelMashpotato5 ай бұрын
Once you use a knob for infotainment, there is no going back. I have a Turbo s CX90. Despite the cup holders, I absolutely love it.
@JohnJones-ky6ki5 ай бұрын
I only have the cx5. But ur right about the knob for info system. One glance on the screen and i know how many clicks to left or right or up and down. I realy dont know why people bash the non-touch screen,
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
@@JohnJones-ky6kibecause it doesn't freeze as much as the Mazda outdated tech.
@raymondsnow774511 күн бұрын
@@JohnJones-ky6kiOn my 3rd Mazda with the controller. It's all muscle memory at this point to run it. Plus you don't have the filthy touchscreen for everyone to see
@Ahmikariane4 ай бұрын
That CX 90 is a dream man! Very well designed lines and curves are beautiful outside and inside......🤬 I want one!! 😁
@BruceLee-to6mw4 ай бұрын
Go and get it. I drove test today. Perfect. I'll choose one.
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
C90 Terrible resale value, some reliability issues definitely better drive than honda.
@BruceLee-to6mw4 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387 Bro. I change cars every three years. So i don't care about resale😜
@jeffwalker19565 ай бұрын
I narrowed it down to these two 3 rows back in July. I ultimately chose the CX-90. The inline six is an awesome engine and has plenty of power. I personally like the look of the CX-90. Once you notice the odd crooked location of the rear windows of the Pilot you won't be able to un-see it. Mazda was offering 1.9 APR and Honda was 4.9 APR, so Mazda won there!
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
Don't do it. Unless you want to burn money
@johnrichards366622 күн бұрын
Excellent job on the video.
@ronaldwhite64764 ай бұрын
Just bought the 2025 Mazda hope I like it. Got the premium plus. With soul red /white interior.
@ike.C.2017Ай бұрын
Congrats! Please come back after a while to give us your review. I’m torn between Mazda CX90 and Hyundai Palisade
@Rza38329 күн бұрын
@ike.C.2017 same with me. I think the better mileage on thr CX90 is tipping me towards Mazda
@harisrao920222 күн бұрын
my dad has a cx90 2025 the top preimuim plus the good thing in that is that it has a whole console in the 2nd row just like the pilot and there is tons of storage there
@weyde12 ай бұрын
Is it possible to get the upper-level models with the leather and wood trim interior vs that hideous cloth trim that Mazda installs on the Premium Plus models? I love most of the features on the CX-90, but the cloth trim on the dash and door panels is a dealbreaker for me.
@proverbs2life8 күн бұрын
It's suade not Cloth
@aristonaquino1753 ай бұрын
I ❤️ mazda
@kathypemberton95356 ай бұрын
Where are the front cup holders in the Mazda?
@retgi15 ай бұрын
in the center console!
@raymondsnow774511 күн бұрын
Under a cover
@art960612 күн бұрын
Ty! 2024 Pilot it is🫡
@fungidr35205 ай бұрын
The dash on the Honda looks very cheap vs Mazda.
@WilliamK-e1j6 ай бұрын
Something is very important to realize that while both cars have comparable outside dimensions, however CX-90 overall inside dimensions are way smaller and comparable to the CR-V inside dimensions.
@joecool97394 ай бұрын
The interior is fucking huge dude, CRV?? 🤣🤣🤣
@WilliamK-e1j4 ай бұрын
@@joecool9739 please check the interior and passenger volumes for both vehicles 🚗 on Car and Driver. Thanks 🙏 Honda CR-V Passenger Volume, F/R: 53/51 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/R: 77/39 ft3 Mazda CX-70 Passenger Volume, F/R: 57/51 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/R: 75/40 ft3
@joecool97394 ай бұрын
@@WilliamK-e1j Why dont you post the dimensions of the CRV and the CX90 since youre the one that made that comparison
@WilliamK-e1j4 ай бұрын
@@joecool9739 Honda CR-V Passenger Volume, F/R: 53/51 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/R: 77/39 ft3 Mazda CX-70 Passenger Volume, F/R: 57/51 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/R: 75/40 ft3 Grand Highlander Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 58/52/39 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 98/58/21 ft3 You can check the interior and passenger volumes for both vehicles 🚗 on Car and Driver. Thanks 🙏
@raymondsnow774511 күн бұрын
"Cell phone pocket" in the seatback... I'm officially old! Obviously no FWD option is available. It's a rear drive based platform! You think the reviewer would know that
@mrtyrang4 ай бұрын
I'll take the CX-90 over the Pilot any day.
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
If you want to burn money in resale value mazda is definitely the best choice.
@mbenton62 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387clown
@jimmy56349 күн бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387true, but if you drive your cars for a long time before you get rid of them, it’s not the big of a deal. For what they cost, I’m buying the one I like best for what I like better.
@chrispronger6614Ай бұрын
Mazda kills it. No competition 😊
@joerichardwad16453 ай бұрын
Honda reliability and handling aren’t as solid as Mazda but the Honda is a better choice if you have a family and have given up on your individuality 😂
@GM23XO5 ай бұрын
Are mazadas reliable? Unsure new to this and looking into Toyota or Honda. Looking into the 2025 models but I know Toyota hasn’t released 2025 yet
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
Stick to toyota, honda is good just noisy. But you will be happy that your car didn't lose half it's value in 3 years. The Mazda drive is amazing. Buy not worth losing that much money.
@mbenton62 ай бұрын
@jeremysanchez387 hondas are unreliable and toyotas are boring as fuck to drive. No thanks. You need to stop living in the past
@MatiasDudas2 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387 mazda uses toyota engines bro and have the second best resell value out of all the car brands fyi
@MatiasDudas2 ай бұрын
@@mbenton6 hondas are reliable bro
@raymondsnow774511 күн бұрын
@MatiasDudas Absolutely not. Except for the CX50 hybrid, Mazda used their own engines. Mazda dies lease the hybrid technology, the 2.5 is a Mazda engine in the CX-90 PHEV
@Taras-Nabad3 ай бұрын
No comparison, Mazda wins hands down.
@davidhorne23265 ай бұрын
Tough decision! Both are impressive, but I like the Pilot V6.
@joecool97394 ай бұрын
Said no one ever
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
Plus reliability and resale value for the win with honda.
@joecool97394 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387 Mazdas are more reliable than Hondas
@mbenton62 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387honda is shitty and they have bad engines
@TheRealStruggler19 күн бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387 are you buying car to sale or to enjoy the driving? If you want resale value honda👍🏻 but if you want to enjoy driving mazda👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
@GB-up6nl5 ай бұрын
Mazda is definitely smaller in all seats, specially the third row. I had to shove myself in third row. Honda third row is much bigger, and it was so comfortable, we test drove both as loaner, I sat in pilots third row for 5 hrs trip and no problems (6ft) don’t go with the specs, try sitting and you’ll notice a huge difference. Plus the trunk space behind the third row is bigger in pilot marginally.
@MarshallJames-dh3gi2 ай бұрын
Except it’s a pilot…. 🤣
@rafalpgresiak6295 ай бұрын
Mazda all the way
@kings_chronicle5923 күн бұрын
I prefer the cx90
@Lam-x6t5 ай бұрын
Honda Look. Like Kia and Hyundai. Cheap!
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
The honda does feel a little cheap no doubt. Mazda does nail it with comfort it's amazing. But resale value is it down fall.
@davidgonzalez35623 ай бұрын
Honda V6 engine Superior and impossible to compare with Kia, Hyundai or your Toyota 4 Cyl
@MatiasDudas2 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387 second highest resell value right behind toyota in car brands
@joecool97394 ай бұрын
The CX90 is more comparable to something like a Genesis GV80 and Lincoln Aviator RWD based powerful v6 luxury SUVs The Honda Pilot isnt on the level of the CX90...it wasnt even on the level of the CX9
@jeremysanchez3874 ай бұрын
That's true those all lose resale value so fast.
@joecool97394 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387 Sorry dude, id take a beautiful, luxurious powerful 6cyl rwd crossover over "great resale value"
@mbenton62 ай бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387you sound crazy as hell
@realnapster152218 күн бұрын
Genesis is a boat compared to these two.
@jimmy56349 күн бұрын
@@jeremysanchez387obviously, you’re stuck on resale value. Not everyone else gives a crap.
@craigjohnchronicles25043 ай бұрын
My comparison isn't apples to apples with the new 2025 Honda Pilot, but I test drove the 2024 CX-90, and.... We have a 2020 Honda Pilot and a 2024 Mazda CX30 for a small commuter car - I also use the CX30 as my canoe hauler. Infotainment system wise, I love the Mazda controls - really dislike the touch screen now. So much easier and more efficient to use the Mazda controllers to scroll/rip through the menus and CarPlay apps than using a touch screen. Interior-wise, Mazda's fit and finish is fantastic. The driver and front passenger seats feel cozy. kinda "fits like a glove" really describes the driver seat. Love the captains chairs in the second row. Third row doesn't feel like an entire afterthought. Storage in the back feels like it has a bit less volume than the Pilot. Storage felt much worse in the CX-9 than the CX-90. I actually prefer the standard sound system in the Mazda over the Bose - Music feels cleaner, more detailed and balanced. But I'm not a bass-head, so YMMV. Pilot feels big and roomy, kinda cavernous. Not a bad thing - just different. The interior feels more utilitarian. A ton of room in the second row, third row still feels cramped. Storage space in the back feels a bit wider - great if you're bringing a dog kennel along, or packing for a few weeks at a cabin for a family of four. You can pack for a two week get away in the Mazda, but it looks like it'll be a bit tighter - just need to pack better. The Pilot sound system is solid, no complaints. I do prefer the standard sound system in the Mazda. Getting into traffic on the interstate going through a cloverleaf onramp, the Mazda CX-90 just grabs the road and hugs the curves. Very little if any body roll. It's effortless getting up to speed with the flow of traffic (which is around 80 mph in SE Wisconsin). The Pilot feels like it's going to roll over, so really have to wait to step on the gas, and even then the Pilot V6 is sluggish in comparison. ...but that's the 2020 Pilot - the 2025 Pilot v6 might have a bit more guts than it used to. Passing acceleration, the 2020 Pilot V6 is a dog. Just doesn't want to be pushed hard - the 2025 Pilot may have improved upon this. The CX-90 responds instantly, and really gets up and goes effortlessly. Heading over to TheTopher's YT Channel to check out his 2024 or 2025 Pilot test drive.
@TomSnyder-gx5ru17 күн бұрын
Although I'm sure the Honda is a great vehicle, it looks "base" and downright ugly sitting next to the beautifully styled Cx-90!
@PLZU81Truth4 ай бұрын
Honda resale and reliability is best by far. Not to mention a 10 speed transmission makes it a far superior product. Mazda transmission is notoriously horrendous.
@joerichardwad16453 ай бұрын
Lol. That’s just not true at all.
@PLZU81Truth3 ай бұрын
@@joerichardwad1645 it’s a fact. Look at the data , mechanics and what consumers say about long term ownership. Nothing really beats a Honda or Toyota from a numbers point.
@MatiasDudas2 ай бұрын
@@PLZU81Truth except that mazda is using toyotas parts...