Wargame: Red Dragon Deck Crash Course Episode 6: USSR

[@alexww180]

It's incredibly difficult to play soviets, Anyone that can beat me with them i have huge respect for. Really makes you think how badly the game was damaged by dlc power creep. Also the mig 25 pd is the derpiest unit in the game lol

[@angrycolonel1957]

the su25t is an asf deleter as well, its the perfect bait for them to fly over your aa trying to kill it, i like to put 2 buk m1's in the weirdest place and bait their asf over it using my su25t, and becuse its got 20% ecm and 2 back armor it will not die if your buks dont shit the bed and miss all their missiles

[@Silverraptorvideos]

What do you think about the cheaper Mig-27's for the anti-tank role? Especially vetted.

[@RazzmannWG]

inconsistent because of SA and risky to use because they need to dive in deep

[@Silverraptorvideos]

@@RazzmannWG Gotcha. Thanks. I remember the base Mig-27 used to be the meta when you could bring 2 elite of those in for like 90 or 95 points and they increased the price in response

[@lewishamilton9251]

@@Silverraptorvideos the guns are very good

[@thilobecker4562]

Jesus, this was really fast :D

[@uncletimo6059]

"you rah gan" so when you watch a WW2 movie, the soviet soldiers shout "youuuuuuuuraaaaaaaaaaaa" when they attack...... uh rah gan

[@siddh6593]

These are completely different words) uraaaaaa! - this is the battle cry of the Soviet troops. uh rah gan - this is 'Uragan' translates as hurricane

[@d3203]

whats your opinion on the Strela10s? I think you didnt covered them

[@williamwimmer5473]

we need another 4v4 match, with your team all running variants of USSR decks. cleanse europe of the filthy capitalists

[@mir_near]

Противооблётка на осах, как я понял? Пехота без званий - плохо. Зачем морская пехота, еще и на колесах, если есть ГРУ? Выбор необычной, но спасибо! Всегда интересно узнать чужое мнение)

[@ivvan497]

What do you think about T-64A? 9rpm + 4HE tank

[@RazzmannWG]

not great, not horrible. armour and optics are lacking, T-72A just does a better job in most scenarios

[@ivvan497]

@@RazzmannWG I think T-64A is better compared to base T-80 in a way.

[@FrostRare]

I know this is different than Putin’s deck, but what about Zelinski’s deck…?

[@princessalana69]

More private purgatory please

[@RazzmannWG]

nope

[@quartersquishy5312]

Ratioed

[@ВедранТешић]

What about SU-27S as an asf

[@staryoun1]

[SA] and low veterancy

[@Jfk2Mr]

@@staryoun1 sure, [SA] if enemy has missiles of equal HE and [F&F] is definitely worse, but in some cases [SA] with higher HE is better than [F&F]

[@TACCOFSX]

what do you mean no turret on ka-50?

[@bloodsongthesparkywolf3717]

You're talking so fast even Closed captions have no clue what the hell you're saying

[@staryoun1]

Mig27k is more expensive than peace rhine, and low veterancy.

[@RazzmannWG]

Also 30AP instead of 26.

[@TACCOFSX]

what do you mean no turret on ka-50?

[@thedaniel4999]

Compare the model of the turret on the KA-50 to the MI-28. They have the same gun and it’s clear to see that the MI-28 has a turret and the KA-50 does not. This means that the KA needs to turn to shoot things while the Mi-28 has a degree of freedom with targeting

[@janko7245]

fixed gun on the side basically

[@fabian4735]

what do you mean no turret on ka-50?

[@Wozrop]

The gun isn't on a chin turret its fixed forward firing.