Thsi was absolutely fantastic - The historical imagery that you put alongside the symbols means they're now hardwired into my brain and made all those hex and counter games much more accesable to me - thanks so much
@DjigitDaniel3 жыл бұрын
Well done, sir. It's been a while since I pored over a laminated map. LOL Nostalgia.
@varovaro19673 жыл бұрын
Happy New Year to you and the intelligent people that follow u! 🍷
@danielwatcherofthelord182312 сағат бұрын
Something tells me the cross shaped "target" straps were not designed like that on accident. The generals of old did seem to start developing an idea that their soldiers were just expendable pawns in their real-life war game.
@AAQ19683 жыл бұрын
Simple and at the same time outstanding explanation. Thanks.
@greywulf313 жыл бұрын
Great videos anticipating your Holland '44 video and hopefully more hex WWII wargames.
@JavaApp3 жыл бұрын
Excellent Ben. The wife and I loved it (we are both light wargamers). I can see episodes covering CRT, the different types of phased movement (like two armor movement phases, and why they are important.) Looking forward to more!
@NoEnemiesHere3 жыл бұрын
AWESOME, Thank you!
@MrNeverbeentoEurope3 жыл бұрын
Happy New Year! I was familiar with the Nato symbol set but the history of them was much more interesting. They make more sense now. Thank you.
@unitedstatesofamericamilit85882 жыл бұрын
Excellent production!
@unitedstatesofamericamilit85882 жыл бұрын
It is a valuable learning tool to share with future prospect/ gamers, as an intro. Very nice 👍
@rastamann20093 жыл бұрын
Interesting - I had read that the X for infantry was for a couple of crossed muskets and that the cavalry symbol was for a sabre.thanks for the video
@turian1moose3 жыл бұрын
The more war games you cover the better. I love them but it's really hard for me to be motivated to read a 40 page rule book. Thank you for this
@bmrigs3 жыл бұрын
.Thank you for this. I am starting to get into wargaming and this video helps a lot.
@teecee54492 жыл бұрын
Great video. Interesting and helpful, love it.
@AjaxOileo7 ай бұрын
Liked the video. Have only one comment: what the videos calls “armored cavalry” is currently called “armored reconnoissance” units.
@ABCDE56285 ай бұрын
Hi Ben I found this video very informational and educational. Really love it, please make new videofor this series, it's been 3 years 😆
@user-cj2fq2nd2f3 жыл бұрын
Very useful! Thank you.
@letzteraufruf3 жыл бұрын
This was super helpful! Love your work, Sir. Thank you very much & have a great new year! :-)
@AlexNLee Жыл бұрын
Outstanding! Appreciate it :)
@PatrioticGestalt3 жыл бұрын
Great intro to wargaming!!! The way I see it (in terms of role playing games), each chits are character sheets for the units. Anyway, in future videos, I would love to see a compare/contrast of the usage of the chits. Lock-n-Load, ASL, GMT, etc. have different games that utilize these chits differently. The series may morph into debating which games are more "realistic". I don't mind the debate.
@decb79593 жыл бұрын
Top work Ben, looking forward to your hex and counter vids.
@briandodge18343 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks. Happy New Year.
@yixiyixi40573 жыл бұрын
Really great video! looking forward to next one!
@chrisridley48403 жыл бұрын
Welcome to hex and counter Ben 😉
@davidthompson72333 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Thanks so much for this. I'm super familiar with the symbols themselves, but wasn't as familiar with some of the origins. Great stuff.
@michaelg.17863 жыл бұрын
That was a a good historical reference and helpful. Now no longer Greek to me 😁
@timbovonnirgendwo73503 жыл бұрын
Great idea! I am so long in wargaming and I did´t know the orign of the signs until now ;-)
@cw.austin66333 жыл бұрын
Back to basics, I love it!
@theplasticcommando73943 жыл бұрын
Good video. I recently picked up a copy of 1967 Six Day War by Decision Games. This is helpful as the unit chips have similar designations.
@ColonelRoseru Жыл бұрын
Footnote, NATO uses cavalry symbol for recon units these days.
@Marinealver3 жыл бұрын
MIL-STD-2525 is your basic guide. Currently the version being used is MIL-STD-2525D. It is all unclassified you can find it on google. But thanks for the historic outlook on the origins of the symbiology.
@GoodCovfefe Жыл бұрын
helpful. thank you.
@KingP0rkchop2 жыл бұрын
You know, if you were wanting to showcase a set of rules that simulate WW1-WW2 era naval warfare as best as possible, I’d recommend Seekrieg 5, arguably the best naval wargame of that era
@harsh-rules2 жыл бұрын
Interesting. Thanks, I'll look for it!
@guilleaeiou3 жыл бұрын
Hey Harsh, could you do a video for Risiko!? It is an italian version of Risk, but interesting, because some rules are not the same, for example defender has three dice, reinforcements are different too, and it has the same missions as the international/american version, but also has 16 missions for tournaments so so interesnting (for me the best and more interesting part of the game). For tournaments it has a punctuation system, not very complex, but different from the international Risk (not only the number of territories), that is very interesting too. Sorry for my bad English, I'm not native speaker.
@kodiak71gene3 жыл бұрын
Could you post the legend at the beginning of the video? I can’t find a reference to help me understand the complex symbols and numbers. Thank you so very much!
@harsh-rules3 жыл бұрын
You can google search for Military Symbology for a lot of examples like this one: www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryStrategy/comments/5mrf16/standard_military_symbols_used_for_planning/