Best IFVs / War Thunder

Speedy IFVs perform surprisingly well in battles involving armored vehicles. In the hands of an experienced player, their ATGMs and rapid-firing autocannons with subcaliber ammunition have spelled doom for many an MBT. Today we’re going to show you the exact IFVs that can easily rival even the most fearsome of tanks.
🔘 Site: warthunder.com/
🔘 Twitch: / warthunder
🔘 Twitter: / warthunder
🔘 Facebook: / warthunder
🔘 Forum: forum.warthunder.com/
#WarThunder

[@MrSpruce]

"Rapid firing autocannons" LAUGHS IN NERFED WARRIOR

[@byroncudworth382]

LAUGHS IN NERFED M3 BRADLEY

[@wolfhunter98]

@@byroncudworth382 Haha was about to say that. That stealth crew nerf too. No reason to :/

[@sheevpalpatine7588]

allies suffer :(((( doucheland uber alles is gaijin's new motto

[@asa0046]

meanwhile Japan: **intensified Battotai**

[@bravomike4734]

Ikr. Me:- *has add on armour* Also Me:- *gets hullbroken by APCBC from T-54 through the rear compartment from the sides*. P.S. the engine is on the front, the fuel tanks is below the turret, there's practically nothing in the rear.

[@omnipotank]

"When flanking, this IFV can easily wreck any MBT it encounters" ... Proceeds to kill Abrams from the front 5:52

[@reswandance7993]

Guess that was a demonstration XD

[@ZenFattyCat.4869]

Lmao XD

[@EcchiRevenge]

Flanking here means exposing your flank to the target.

[@k_balu-8104]

lmao, the Maus is can kill the Abrams from the front :v, Phlydaily done it

[@EcchiRevenge]

@@k_balu-8104 So can a T-55. :p But we only see the clips where it works; not the other dozen times when it fails.

[@Pischingers]

The BMP-3's atgm reload is so trash even Gaijin forgot it existed

[@BENKYism]

It's slow to reload because it can be fired on the move

[@Doyle-]

@dandoosh garra its A Shell Not ATGM

[@oliversearle3996]

@@BENKYism the type 89 can fire its missiles on the move

[@Doyle-]

@dandoosh garra I Mean Sheridan Is Fastest ATGM For Me,For KV-2 Itself Yeah Pretty Good For 1Shot Beast Even After They Nerf It Is still Beast not To Mention in That BR People Are Mostly Not Seeing Around Them,KV-2 Is For Ambush(Surprise) Not For Frontline Because Everyone Vehicle Gun Is Can Pen The KVs Armor.

[@sarttee]

the BMP3 was manually loaded by the Crew.

[@MilHistoria]

Why was this deleted and re uploaded?

[@Steve-rq7mj]

All BRs were in russian. Now they removed them

[@SizzGrizz]

Look at my comment.

[@boomboy4102]

@@SizzGrizz oke ( O д O)

[@rn-zu5ld]

A lot of things were in Russian and video was poor quality

[@Galinjins]

I was lade a comlent about everything that was wrong i the video

[@lilsandwich7535]

Why cant we have the willys jeep with a recoilless gun on the back or a humvee because the russian have the milk trucks, Italians with the R3, and so on

[@aerina_eclair]

@dandoosh garra But those AA don't do harm to Heavy tanks? Except for the Jumpo because of its side

[@jakobc.2558]

In italy a couple of soldiers made a atillery jeep by strapping 8 bazooka rocket launchers on a rotating mount on the back. The M1 Bazooka could penetrate ~80mm of armof at max. Not only would it be a speedy boy but it would actualy be a worly war 2 vehicle _Looks at R3_

[@dayton8282]

dandoosh garra so only certain nations should get speedy td’s??? Either take them out or give them to everyone so it’s balanced

[@jakobc.2558]

@@dayton8282 I mean I am still waiting for US to get speedy bombers that could be a counterpart to the JU 288/ME 264. The B-26 Marauder would fit into that cathegory perfectly. But over 5000 were made in world war 2 so naturaly gaijin wont ad it because of their prototype bias.

[@CreativeZachGaminglebestvids]

dandoosh garra you can literally kill both of those by pressing space, I mean I guess they’re pretty hard to kill if you don’t have a space bar.

[@theryzinosaurus]

If only the m3 bradley wasnt so nerfed, removing 2 crew members, nerfed the pen, the proxy ammo...

[@wolfhunter98]

I miss the old Bradley too man.

[@SherlockHolmes000]

They nerfed the Type 89 too compared to its real life counterpart.

[@BenjaPar_Truly]

I got hull breaked way more times in the M3 Bradley than in the M22... also, almost all these vehicles can have reactive armor...

[@wolfhunter98]

The later versions do, this is just the M3 Bradley. I just assumed they where going to add the M3A2 or A3 version that has those upgrades down the road but they have not. Not that it really matters after all the nerfs. :c

[@EmperordovahkiinLord]

Quick question just got the Bradley and id like to point something out. My dad worked on bradleys during operation Iraqi freedom and he saw the Bradleys missle launcher mechanic and said its not accurate because irl a Bradley can fire its tow missle on the move even at top speed. Why isn’t like this in game?

[@martinmax3958]

Emperor Dovah thx finally another one who saw it.

[@AHappyCub]

Because Gaijin hates US tree, since M4 76 have to face KTs very often and US players tends to get matched up against literally everyone except UK

[@benatoadriano20]

Because.....Welcome to WarThunder

[@sarttee]

because this game is made by russians.

[@Gausdave213]

@@AHappyCub US ground tree*

[@gansior4744]

best IFV is Dardo IFV from Italy. It is so good that apparently it dont deserve to be in this game

[@BENKYism]

Nope

[@gansior4744]

@@BENKYism no

[@gansior4744]

@@Doyle- spanish you say? Interesting

[@ArsenyPro]

Yeah, as well as Freccia and SuperAV.

[@gansior4744]

@@ArsenyPro would want that, but as Italy gets Navy, most probably F-104 (hoping for S 1A1), and still lacking heli tree it isnt very possible that we will get more for Italy.

[@HIFLY01]

I wish the Bradley wasn't this bad. The rockets take way to long to set up. Only way to use them is sit closer to your spawn and wait. Otherwise leos will get to you faster and you won't be able to do anything

[@riccardomariani9648]

Exept spammig it with the subcaliber because leos have paper armor

[@Steve-rq7mj]

I am pretty sure that this was reuploaded because of some things being in russian.

[@fabovondestory]

What was russian?

[@rn-zu5ld]

@@fabovondestory vehicle names

[@fabovondestory]

@@rn-zu5ld ou, ok

[@jpetras16]

Again, these people have no idea what they're talking about. Gaijin put in the wrong video of some footage of the runway for like 10 seconds with no talking.

[@generalrommel5666]

Blyat

[@AngryNerd]

It was nice to see the skin of the Bradley I gunned on in the first Gulf War in this video. It was on the Bradley in the background ( C-16 ) and was created by JoKeR_BvB09. Thanks Joker 🙏🏼

[@KATHLEEN-XM772]

Marder 1A3 would be great as a side research in the same slot for Begleitpanzer 57

[@davidfox2056]

Italian tech tree needs IFV's like Dardo or Freccia

[@kugelblitz4419]

It will get it

[@andregabrieltimcang8182]

There you have it, the italian nail gun

[@DiNo_006]

Love the beglitepanzer and the BMP 2

[@brannonmeador1792]

2:25 the brits were trying to make up for the reverse speed of their ww2 tanks

[@FokkerBoombass]

Type 89 is so good it's not even funny. Able to fire two ATGMs on the move, thermals... and that sets it just 0.3 BR higher than the rest.

[@taxcollector5920]

not anymore

[@MrMcPain]

Don't forget the begleitspanzers' turbo function! Reverse the turret,hold down the trigger and behold the amazing turbo!

[@Cerdrick]

So, I couldn't help but notice that you didn't talk about the Type 89's inability to turn in first gear. Having it setup for feature not implemented is more than a little stupid. That got me killed on more than a few occasions...

[@Nirrti]

I would recommend binding left and right brake keys separately, as they allow the Type 89 to turn even at slow speeds, instead of trying to turn using A or D, you can hold down accelerate, and either brake to turn that direction quickly. Here's a comparison between trying to turn normally, and turning with the brake; kzbin.info/www/bejne/pn_ddKCMet98p6s

[@Cerdrick]

@@Nirrti That is the generally accepted solution, but I was more addressing the root. The steering method that the irl vehicle uses isn't in the game, so the gear ratios are screwed up. As far as I know, the Type 89 is the only vehicle that suffers from this, so the official response of it is working as intended is just lazy. Gaijin should either fix the gear ratio, or bring in regenerative steering.

[@pebbles9973]

Do you know why the Type 89's missiles got reduced in amount? The vehicle is not carrying infantry and thus I'd assume you'd be carrying more than 2 spare missiles.

[@Cerdrick]

@@pebbles9973 That would be the logical assumption, some obscure supply list or something to nerf an IFV that can fire its missiles while moving at full speed.

[@Nirrti]

@@Cerdrick Oh yeah, for sure, but at least there is a workaround.

[@ZzVinniezZ]

played BMP-1P, i dont really see much people using it when it literally destroy anything that move for that BR of 7.3.

[@evo3s75]

I've seen more Spz BMP-1P's then russian BMP-1's. it is however annoying that players with Russian BMP-1's can put on DDR decals

[@24videowatcher]

Now imagine if they gave the M3 Bradly the APFSDS to bring back it's 110mm of pen

[@carlitosskater89]

Which in reality pens over 160mm I read on some article on wikis bibliography.

[@gaijinbot8135]

Listen I've played this game for a long time, this is what Gaijin will do. They're going to release a new Bradley and put it at 9.0 and give it it's tungsten ammo which will possibly pen around 140mm and also give it a higher pen TOW. First they'll put it at 8.7 and then everyone will start complaining how op it will be at that br so they'll bump it up to 9.0 because Gaijin is incompetent and doesn't test their vehicles out long enough to realize at what BR it will be balanced at

[@stellarfox5869]

@@carlitosskater89 most of the information about modern vehicles like the bradley is still classified, and penetration of the M1919 APFSDS-T shell for the bradley is just going to be gaijin putting a random number that looks balanced for the br its in. the highest amount of information i could find about the shell is here: www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/m919.htm

[@Furyfoe]

@@gaijinbot8135 Wrong. They know its busted they do it so people pay eagles to rush research it so they can club others with how op it is, then when a vehicle stops making them a ton of money they put it at its correct BR

[@phonenamone6858]

while the warrior has a bigger gun, it had the same pen of 110mms

[@rotticus7777]

you guys should add the LAV-3 and LAV-6, would spice up the variety

[@jirijanku9623]

german IFV like marder and puma would be also awesome

[@sovietred7371]

Im surprised that the BMP-3 wasn't mentioned

[@infantjones]

It's like a BMP-2 but with an insanely slower reloading ATGM!

[@JaesWasTaken]

Frankly, the BMP-3 is the weakest of the bunch. BMP-2 is what gives me nightmares.

[@ww2planes_810]

So when are we getting a game mode so normal helos can do something and not get smacked by Ka 50s? Or something that outrages ka 50s as ground units?

[@evo3s75]

owh yes, fckn hate it... I have my German Aloutte and I just keep on getting curbstombed by modern helo's... so I just stopped playing heli's and now will just get the G.91 R/3 since helo's are impossible to grind/play with

[@jonathanandersen5274]

Uhhh what about bmp-3 with its ability to fire atgms on the go?

[@stridsvagn1039]

And the 4 sec reload for the ATGM's that gaijin didn't make right

[@poland5606]

The m3 bradly can do that too

[@PolishProgrammer]

Good work reuploading. Will we see agm45 Shrike or aim7 sparrow soon for Phantoms II?

[@OneStrangeDeer]

Not like it matters consider anything below 9.0 NEVER sees night battles

[@TheArklyte]

Apparently best possible armaments for IFVs are: 1)combo of 100+mm cannon with barrel launched ATGM option, coaxial 25+autocannon and coaxial and roof mounted GPMG; 2)50+mm autocannon with programmable or VT fuzed rounds, ATGM launcher with automated reload and AA missile option and coaxial and roof mounted HMG.

[@TheAlmightySPAA]

So the BMP-3 mixed with the CV90 /w a 50mm bushmaster III

[@TheArklyte]

@@TheAlmightySPAA eh, no, just no. I've listed two different combinations. Combining them further makes no sense as you combine the cons of the compromises, but not the pros. Option 1 gives you an ability to use simple HE/HEAT ammo and a lot of ammo for autocannon, option 2 - higher caliber ATGMs with better range, power and guidance system, ability to use more powerful autocannon ammo including VT fuzed shells, ability to launch several ATGMs without having to wait for barrel to clear, but at the cost of having less ammo for everything and no traditional artillery shells.

[@TheAlmightySPAA]

I mean those are your options 1= bmp-3 2= CV90

[@Hugo.officialol]

Nice vid!

[@gojuancamilo102]

Next for Germany could we get the Marder 2?

[@Aemson]

Oh yeah thet wer nice

[@Serkay64]

Or atleast the Marder 1a3

[@ilovemilia6968]

this aged well

[@poland5606]

I’d honestly rather have the lyinx or puma

[@joerobwood]

Ive played the warrior for months and gotta say the addon armor has only worked once in hundreds if not thousands of games, it just seems to add another place to hullbreak

[@cg9121]

I feel that this was a promo for the Swedes, because the strfc gave the least amount in terms of weapons when all the other vehicles have Atgms and more rounds for the auto cannon.

[@Vermillion-Tea]

i made a few videos dedicated to my type 89 i love that thing. maybe war thunder might feature it one day

[@henke7864]

Hope we get the CV9040-Bill in the future. It has 2x Robot 56. Also hoping we get a earlier CV90 at 9.0-9.7 BR area. Maybe IKV 91 with proto CV90 turret and gun?

[@rocket_sensha4337]

there were was version of it with the same 35mm kde as in th type 89 right?

[@einar8019]

@@rocket_sensha4337 the cv90 can mount 30,35 and 40mm cannons

[@matthewdyson2464]

When da Bradley gon get it’s apfsds I need to know

[@Rockstar-vs1nb]

Are there any plans to add the BMD series vehicles?

[@NiceGuy-Nationalist]

Still eagerly anticipating VCC 80 Dardo for Italy. 🤞

[@juliankurwan7357]

Spray and Pray is the spirit of some of those IFVs

[@THEBLUETIGER911]

Learning about that Japanese ATGM on the go, grinding Japan started to look tempting for the first time ever

[@PeenileCansir]

lol they removed the on the move atgm launches

[@k_balu-8104]

We need the Puma IFV and the Marder 2 IFV (the Marder 2 have two variant of guns, a 35 and 50 mm autocannons which can shot APFSDS-T rounds)

[@noicsuu3325]

We all know that hullbreak is supposed to make the smaller vehicles get killed more easy with the big guns and also simulate a critical structural failure BUT when a DM13 round bounces off the front plate of the strf 9040C and then barely penetrates the turret (commanders optic) the hullbreak mechanic kicked in and for some reason the vehicle crumbled to pieces without its top sight which is the part of the whole vehicle that holds the structual integrity of the vehicle (strf 9040C)

[@Serkay64]

While I shoot a Roikkat 105 in the side with 105mm DM23 and he doesnt hullbreak

[@IbaraKaminari]

My heart is only for begleit 57

[@adrienpurdy1608]

Or as PhlyDaily calls it, the "Bagel Panzer 57"

[@poland5606]

Where puma:(((

[@evilreddog]

CV90 could mount the Bill 1 and Bill 2 wire guided missiles tho. Never fielded, but with how many paper vehicles the game already have it should not be a problem

[@benni1015]

Mouse aimed atgms on a mobile vehicle which shoots heat against heavy ww2 tanks, which are slow and heavy, rely in their armour and are slow and heavy. Sounds perfectly balanced at 7.3.

[@zur0550]

The reupload of this video made me click it when it pop out twice in my notification...

[@bravomike4734]

When ur pc is so potato that me a British main literally can't afford to go fast in my Warrior because of the drop in the framerate reducing my situational awareness and reaction ability. :(

[@PeenileCansir]

5:12 ah yes on the move you say?

[@simoncox6843]

with the fv510 warrior are you putting the new cannon in the tech tree as they have been in the prose of changing it from 30 mm to 40 mm stabilised?

[@masonhammond8907]

Will you guys be adding the other Marder Vehicles or will it just stay at the Begleitpanzer?

[@imado952]

everyone's talking here about tanks then ima talk about cheap soda in 0:53

[@emilgirginov9848]

You again didnt mention the BMP-3 ?

[@Boomy2710x]

Emil Girginov it’s not technically an AFV by some standards

[@emilgirginov9848]

@@Boomy2710x Its an IFV... and this video is about IFVs

[@Boomy2710x]

Emil Girginov yeah you can call it AFV IFV, some fit both, but in some categories the BMP3 isn’t classed as an IFV

[@emilgirginov9848]

@dandoosh garra Forgot about the autocannon that shreds mbts on the side. Maybe speak for yourself next time. You either dont know how to play it or have not seen anyone that knows how to.

[@emilgirginov9848]

@@Boomy2710x the BMP-3 is an IFV and in my opinion deserves a spot on the video

[@ferdinandstrau3513]

By far the best IFV is the Falcon with the APDS belt. I mean its a better Warrior just without the ATGM but who cares.

[@judgefonti5786]

the falcon is not an IFV.

[@zahwa242]

"Rapid firing autocanon" 0:13 *wirberwind agressively

[@Maxcraft12]

Can we get the german Puma IFV or the Marder 2 experimental? :)

[@Serkay64]

Or atleast theMarder 1a3

[@KATHLEEN-XM772]

There's a problem with the Schützenpanzer Puma IFV, the ATGMs it has are strikers that come from the sky and hit the target on the top, idk how they will make that into the game tbh

[@combatantezoteric2965]

@@KATHLEEN-XM772 this comment hasnt aged well

[@poland5606]

@@KATHLEEN-XM772 the Puma would carry the Spike lr wich would be the most powerful atgm in the game but the American lynx would carry the tow2b

[@KATHLEEN-XM772]

@@poland5606 idk how they would add that to the game

[@agridley1116]

They should add an infantry mechanic to the ifv’s, by adding crew in the back and letting them crew replenish other tanks

[@williambenedictalava2634]

Happy with the bmp-1p coz the ifv can pull BS kills on it despite not having any two plane stabs and fancy thermal sights.

[@antuanettetarazona9073]

I LOVE THIS GAMEEEEE

[@_nanking5374]

spookston is rolling rn

[@gino-cz9zu]

When will we be able to share stuff with squad mates in for exemple events its anoying to put a price on stuff ur friends need

[@benjaminkauss4327]

@Warthunder... When comes the puma ifv or the marder 1.a3?? We need a stabilized ifv at German tech tree,.. And the type 89 is some sort of marder ivf.... So it's not very hard to bring the marder in the game or better the puma :)

[@tactan9172]

Seeing the strf 90 gave me ptsd

[@eQui253]

Can't wait till the german Puma is in the game.. it is the reason i started the german IFV line. From this list.. the BMP2 and the swede are my fav.

[@chris.tarlagias]

hello its here i wanted to comment here cause it got suggested to me lol

[@eQui253]

@@chris.tarlagias it's here :)

[@chanlabador1079]

Hey WarThunder why was this video private a few hours ago

[@SizzGrizz]

OMG THEY LISTEN TO ME ABOUT MAKING THEM SHOOT AT HELICOPTERS AT 4:25. If you didn't know the first video had just aircraft sitting on a airfield while they just talk about the proximity fused shells.

[@borizon7533]

Pretty sure they had planned it like this in the first place and it was just an editing error

[@enderman8151]

I'm genuinely shocked the BMP-3 wasn't even mentioned.

[@varunkoganti9067]

sure don't mention that the gun is unstablized on the beglietpanzer57, don't mention that the HE-VT belt takes 20 sec to switch.

[@peterfruchtig5334]

And the HE VT is trash.

[@Fos-]

me: wants to have a great day in rb tank match bmp: no

[@maxvan2243]

Can you guys make the leopard 1 have a working spot light? Thanks

[@DiNo_006]

HOT LINE!! Is the newest puma in the game an IFV?? And are there old WW2 IFVs?

[@yeetnoodle9668]

"The Type 89 can fire ATGMS on the move!" *Cries in nerfed Type 89 ATGM launchers*

[@kagari_toram]

then nerfs it again and moves to 9.0

[@lpflore]

BMP-3: Am I a joke to you?

[@The_Lost_Yet_Found]

Please do a climbing the ranks video with French aircrafts next gaijin

[@direct0r]

Hey Gaijin! Can you please consider adding rudimentary cruise missiles into the game? For example the He-111 could carry the V1 “Flying Bomb”

[@einar8019]

they wouldent work since they have to be programed ahead of time nad has to be launched at the right time in the right direction

[@gunnutcase1234]

The type 89 will always be my favourite I don't care if it can't turn in 1st gear it's gun is very good it's atgms are very good it's optics are good and I think its the best looking ifv if you don't agree that's fine everyone can have an opinion

[@santiagogastiazoro3142]

Could you incorporate some argentinian planes? Like Pulqui, Pucara, Pampa and others?

[@warcats7207]

best ATGM carriers plz

[@yawarfareed]

I have only played BMP-1/2 and I love BMP-2

[@zackarygallant6564]

Can you please do a tutorial on how to set up a flight stick

[@pedror598]

Well, I'll have to comment again> PLEASE. FIX. THE. BEGLEIT. It doesn't have a stabilizer, the feeding system is broken, doesn't have it's smoke dischargers and it doesn't have the heli warning system.

[@cheeki3998]

its almost like you guys forgot about BMP-3

[@peterfruchtig5334]

Cause there is no difference to the BMP 2

[@wockhardt_user]

Dardo IFV coming when?

[@schultz6606]

For Germany air vehicles, anything below rank 3.0 is just nice to have and look at from a historic perspective. If trying to go in AB or RB you will automatically be thrown against 3.7s at least. How brave and stunning and PC and everything to put me and my little 7.7mm against a 4x20mm Spitfire. But hey, they lost the war so that's fine. Can Gaijin sort rooms out, if my maximum rank vehicle is 1.7, then don't trow me in with 3.7s, I want a room with maximum 1.7 - 2.0. Is it that hard?

[@roko-machine4663]

Will we ever get the dardo ifv? Italy need an ifv that can be used in cqc

[@prizrak-br3332]

OTOMAGIC

[@poland5606]

Lamao

[@avay8726]

Fighting a smoll atgm boiii with a fearsome WW2 kingtiger

[@therealcorgi_1052]

What is the heaviest plane in the game?

[@k33pg0ing3]

I hope the Marder for germany comes out in the next patches

[@WTCheatShaming]

Too bad you nerfed the bradley and havent given it its proper rounds....

[@delamovies]

How did they nerf it and what rounds?

[@WTCheatShaming]

@@delamovies Its top rounds used to do like 123mm of pen now they are down to like 80

[@atomicspartan131]

iRambL and the crew nerf

[@gini0723]

Give APFSDS to M3

[@ZioBorisitalia]

Any hope for italian IFV? Dardo and Freccia?

[@Redminer9999]

Why is it that when you J out on a runway in RB mode (To change loadout) it still counts you as having a death?

[@popkorncheff8801]

very unexpected that the vehicle with the highest BR is the most deadliest

[@francescoboselli6033]

Waiting to see some Italian IFVs added into the game 🇮🇹

[@paramite67]

here they are :)))

[@russianodst6671]

Why aren't some premium/non premium vehicles not available in the tech tree on xbox? I got this awesome P51D-10 RAF skin but looking around i never found it yet it wasn't in the tech tree at all! Why?

[@russellmiles2861]

Is there any armoured vehicle that is not best used for flanking manouvers?

[@subject204ghost3]

Um what? The bagelpanzer is not better than the Bradley or the bmp 2. Its gun doesnt have a stabilizer and its recoil makes the whole "auto cannon" point pointless since you end up having to tap fire it most of the time to not use up the limited 48 shells that you have until a long reload. But i am glad you guys brought up the point that its aphe is the shell you should be using instead of its higher penning ap shell. Its aphe can often one shot mbts thanks to their 4 man crews.

[@nhatnamangvu5604]

Recommend adding new markIII and markIV strf with new d series turret and 50mm bofors from sweden

[@crazyeen1564]

reposted and still not BMP-3 XD really

[@aserkill6096]

As I said in the one before it was reuploaded, *keks in maus killing most of em with 100mm pen heat*

[@stefanpavicic6277]

And if they destroy your cannons just ram them.

[@ncpdswordshielddivision2240]

IFV= Infranty Fighting Vehicles Can Destroy Tanks Me: *VISIBLE CONFUSION*

[@politicallyinaccuratetoast4757]

They're not made directly to fight infantry, they're infantry support What else you think the missiles on them are for? Decoration?