WATCH: Congressional Hearing on UFOs! - LIVE

Tune in at 6:00am PT / 9:00am ET on Tues. May 17 when the US House of Representatives hold a hearing on unidentified aerial phenomena.
Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉 bit.ly/39Ub3bv
Read the CNET article: Congress to Hold First Public Hearing on UFOs in 50 years: How to Watch cnet.co/38q3fhu
#CNETLive #UFO #UFOs

[@arodderz]

For those of us that have witnessed something incredible and unexplainable,remember this. We have always known the truth. Don't allow anyone to ever take that away from you.

[@dermotmccorkell663]

Thank you for posting this

[@daisymuhammad3655]

The HONORABLE Minister Farrakhan is connected to those Identified flying wheel.If you really want the people to know You would consult him

[@alexeilindes7507]

Really? Idk... idk what any of this actually is. It doesn't make sense

[@Memphis901Production]

Government : “Probably just mass hallucinations on a world wide scale” Public : Has that ever happened before on any other topic? Gov: No, but we assure you that’s what’s going on here.

[@bluesky-rb8fn]

I am with you 100% Sooo many of us, we know what we have experienced!! Sometimes you think now what do I do with that???

[@cgiglio148]

What a complete sham on the American public. Just talk abiut the tic tac

[@akirausagi]

A friend of mine asked me why people aren’t freaking out about this? Well, it’s because we knew! We all knew this whole time, and we have been waiting for the government to say it.

[@ourglass3346]

What did you know the whole time? Please elaborate?

[@safiazad2865]

Yeah and what kind of friend you are talking about? Isn't he from the earth?

[@northerncowpoke7020]

@@ourglass3346 Roswell and every little ufo event that has happened and the government tried covering it up. So yeah basically we knew this whole time, it’s jus now coming out to the public.

[@lancasterbristow9410]

When the core members of the Watergate plan under the then President Richard Nixon swore secrecy until death that they will not reveal the covert operation but guess what happened? The scandal began to leak out and as more and more spoke out, it brought Nick's Presidency to an inglorious end. Same with secrets kept by the government on UFOs and Aliens. Some former/retired G-men who were involved in this project talked about highly classified information(just search books/infos on those former employees).but since the government refuse to acknowledge and deny their revelation, the majority of the public brushed it off as another conspiracy theory. So yes, the UAP phenomenon is real and hold on to your seats as more will be revealed slowly by the Pentagon in days to come.

[@tylsimys67]

Does "freaking out" mean some new cult may be founded?

[@heresthedeal9915]

These "UAP's" have been around for as long as humans have been able to observe them. The sickening part of this whole thing is that only a select few people have the privilege of having the true knowledge of what's really going on, while the rest of us are fed lies and kept in the dark.

[@sangbeom6245]

I don't think the ones closest to the chest even have a clue what is going on...

[@heresthedeal9915]

@@sangbeom6245 I don't disagree. There have been internal military documents that have been leaked over the decades---many of which are authentic---suggesting that even some of the upper-most ranked individuals in the U.S navy and army have been blocked from accessing certain information about this subject, and that it has been offloaded to select individuals within the private sector.

[@illusionzauto]

UAP's have been here before the dinosaurs existed. Yes we are fed lies but as long as you know we are fed lies is all that matters because people like you and myself know what's really going on and that is the hesitation here at this hearing that other intelligence exists elsewhere. If there was no need to feed us lies then why would they have the need to do a closed and classified hearing?

[@tuxoxoracer]

@@sangbeom6245 The ET like it that way

[@shinkurt]

It really isn't fair.

[@James_Messier]

Nothing new was shared. Everything juicy will be discussed in closed session and the public won't know of course.

[@raikked]

Sad

[@charlieknoll1269]

The juicy stuff won't even be shared there they're not even gonna tell anybody about the juicy stuff including Congress

[@TheHighlanderprime]

Again, this destroys the purpose of this conference … It’s groundhog’s day all over again ...

[@GeorgeNichols]

@@charlieknoll1269 people are going to have to be the ones to bust this wide open. These clowns are going to continue to sit on their hands and keep everything secret. That seems evident from this hearing.

[@SamtheIrishexan]

Hard to share juicy info when they don't have any. If they did we would already have faster than light travel. Since we don't, well I think they are just as ignorant as the rest of us.

[@jasoncorganbrown]

I can’t believe they were struggling with having a frame by frame app available for this hearing.

[@battlewands]

Lol. This does not give me hope on their improved technology angle. Put a go pro camera on helmet and you improved their tech 100x

[@snappr2523]

@UC5vvzxC2aWJKV0uT5Ka57Vw Yep...He just happens to have his iPhone in his flight suit. I'm sure the same video was on the a/c video recorder. That will probably be shown during the classified version.

[@thomasbermea347]

"struggling"... The public, recorded hearing is just a show. The closed hearing is probably where all the good stuff is.....

[@erikcarpenter7860]

Oh that was planned and with the purpose of taking up time

[@how2pick4name]

It's VLC player and you can go frame by frame but only forward. Also it's not in the interface by default and the hotkey (E) is not your typical one. It's just incompetence but it's the government so yeah. lol

[@ematt182]

The reference to having total transparency with the public yet a closed session is required😂

[@razony]

The ignorant are easily deceived.

[@StandOnGuard4Thee]

P.u.r.e. I.r.o.n.y.

[@razony]

@@StandOnGuard4Thee Do they think we're really that dumb?

[@StandOnGuard4Thee]

@@razony yes the government's of the world really do think the citizens are that dumb... or easily misled and distracted .

[@razony]

@@StandOnGuard4Thee yup!

[@garethhogue8860]

Why are they holding this briefing when they are just going to continue and lie to the public and then go and have a classified briefing?

[@beaulin5628]

Typical. As usual.

[@trekkiejunk]

Where is your evidence that they are lying, or are continuing to lie? I go by data and evidence, not just speculation.

[@nickfanzo]

Maybe if we stopped killing each other and our planet we could move forward as a species and wouldn’t need so much supervision.

[@josephpuentes4160]

We're apes. Thats what apes do. Transhumanism is the way

[@cartermclaughlin2908]

But then you'd get your share of surplus production and maybe a little comfort and free time! How is that fair to the rich people who paid peanuts to own all the IP? And land? And housing? And communication? And prisons? And legislators? They were born with all that stuff on a silver platter - you can't steal from babies. Unless you're a heartless monster. Do you steal from babies?!! Shut up and go back to work.

[@izznoogood]

@@josephpuentes4160 the sooner i can log out and log in the better :D

[@josephpuentes4160]

@@izznoogood Im just angry about how little EM rad we can percieve. Aliens could be here resonating in the sub UV area and wouldnt know

[@josephpuentes4160]

@@rhondareed3002 We are apes. What do you think we are? Plants?

[@amandakane3594]

The only thing I took from watching that, was actually body launguage not words. They talk a whole lot of measured BS. Both the questioners and the questioned ...but they all actually KNOW what they are not sharing publicly. They all were squirming and looked very uncomfortable with the information they did NOT tell us.. that will be discussing in closed session at noon. That, was very interesting.

[@Ishmal_Khan]

Exactly they know more than that . Perhaps chilling with aliens on ISS too

[@guy14552]

Yup. something must be happening that they are no longer to explain, control, or keep under wraps

[@sangbeom6245]

My guess is the underwater reports are a bit freaky especially where these things go underwater or what they do or how fast....

[@nellybetancourt4317]

They took their skins off at noon in there closed sessions.

[@jeffbruin1]

@@guy14552 Absolutely- something is forcing their hand.

[@robertfaybrick4483]

This statement says it all(the guy repeated it twice): “WE DO NOT WANT POTENTIAL ADVERSARIES TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WE SEE OR UNDERSTAND. Public disclosures must be carefully considered on a case by case basis”

[@laattardo]

Which is ridiculous considering that most countries out there don't stigmatize nor deny like we do

[@laattardo]

Also don't forget that France handed the plant zando dude all their files.. freaking clown show

[@Memphis901Production]

@@laattardo it’s not the ufo information they are concerned about sharing. It’s the fact that some of it is illegally obtained such as satellite imagery we shouldn’t have or sensors in our adversaries oceans that we also are not allowed to have in place. This that data can’t be presented publicly.

[@woodlandgangsta3931]

It's not what we see it's HOW WE SEE. You guys are brain dead

[@jodohmu8974]

They Will not disclose it to you. You must search your truth.

[@mylesjarvis7571]

Boy would I love to be in that closed session!

[@GeneticHybrids]

All you would of heard was a few men discussing how they need to do a better job hiding what all the black money is being spent on🤣

[@justinreel5546]

The session was closed because they know what’s going on. They just don’t want to tell us and hide it under the guise of national security

[@e.s.9285]

That’s where they discuss how to continue to use lie like the government does. They’re the damn government. It ain’t gonna change. They need to come out and just say it. “We’ve got exotic material and here’s what it is.... “ Maybe then they’ll have some credibility. You know how many crystal clear videos they’ve got to have?.!!!

[@hippieparents420]

Amen

[@susannahjones6410]

Which one?

[@meadowbrown9634]

I should have known they wouldn't tell us anything new. Our government is a waste of time and money

[@sangbeom6245]

Actually a lot of new things were said. Stop expecting it be Independence Day or X Files

[@TSoulx]

@@sangbeom6245 this was a disgraceful sham

[@meadowbrown9634]

you must have been part of the closed session

[@sdsfgfhrfdgebsfv4556]

@@sangbeom6245 don't bang your head until you crack it open, that's not good for your health

[@zoop2132]

What a bunch of bs artistes. This was a joke from the opening vid. Now on to the closed session where we show better pics taken with classified equipment. This whole subject is being approached as a threat scenario which is not particularly healthy.

[@tomsanger963]

Its being approached as a threat scenario so that they can create a UAP false flag threat incident as yet another diversion to gather power.

[@eyoutube1]

Hearing them mention Project Bluebook gives me chills. There is a significant information gap between now and then where disinformation and fog have completely consumed our minds.

[@cinnaminson0653]

The dark hand of Israel 🇮🇱 is no doubt behind this issue.

[@Memphis901Production]

Government : “Probably just mass hallucinations on a world wide scale” Public : Has that ever happened before on any other topic? Gov: No, but we assure you that’s what’s going on here.

[@wiremuturner1482]

I always knew that thats not possible, that sounds like some professor X type of idea, if you know what I mean

[@iconsuegra]

What a disgrace! Can't believe that our government keep going in circles. They think we are stupid and ignorant. So disappointed ☹️

[@anthonywalker3175]

I agree with you. I have never heard such a load of rubbish and cover ups again

[@sangbeom6245]

Actually if you understand military history and tactics this is a huge eye opener

[@per2]

" They think we are stupid and ignorant." they dont think that, they KNOW that and its true, we are dumb sheep lazy easy manipulated ppl ... keeping this under rugs worked last 50 years no reason to think that it cannot work for another 50

[@TheCoon1975]

They're not wrong, the vast majority of us are stupid or at least willfully ignorant.

[@carlfr2977]

Agree!.......They'll continue to downplay it & provide generic information to make us move on due to boredom!

[@Jorge-cs6yv]

I am a believer. I have witnessed something not done in 50 years. whether this was a transparent session or not I don't care. what I do care about is that this phenomena is finally being discussed in the open. I no longer feel stigmatized. I can openly talk about this without being ridiculed as a lunatic.

[@checo692]

What have you witnessed?

[@swiv99]

right on...i to have seen several things the past few yrs, cant explain..Have always believed and wanted to see something, anything!..and got that wish in recent yrs.

[@mako7908]

Same here man I’ve seen stuff to but I don’t really share cause people won’t believe

[@mako7908]

@Fishermonk I was in north Florida and we were driving to a pizza place and I was the only one who saw it but through the trees in the air it looked like a diamond shape but black and had red lights on it. It was floating in the air but once we past some trees it disappeared.

[@VG-rj8pn]

Good luck with that most sheep Americans will still blather the same ridicule

[@jamesdunn6461]

The enemy isn't in other countries but rather all around us and in that hearing 💯

[@masterdon3821]

20 years ago,in Romania, I've seen a light that hover for 20 minutes and then walk away at 1000kmh .this happened for weeks. An army officer and helicopter mechanic take many pictures,but he couldn't explain the phenomenon.

[@matthewgoodwin8364]

What a waste of time. I think Shiff and Gallagher were the only representatives that had pertinent questions that were met with mundane, bureaucratic responses. Not a single representative addressed the language choices between the classified and unclassified UAPTF report, nobody addressed the rationale for specific shapes remaining redacted upon FOIA release, nobody discussed the academic paper that analyzes the data from the Nimitz and discusses maneuvers in excess of Mach 60, nobody requested more information about the testimony of now-public pilots and WSOs. And now all the information of actual value is being discussed in a private setting with the blanket reasoning being that it relates to national security. What a waste of time for the first congressional hearing on UFOs in 50 years.

[@SoulofAlice]

I honestly think that many questions were asked, but they were shot down every single time. I liked the one dude who asked, frankly: "you seem to only talk about the instances which you can or have confidence to explain, rather than talk about or answer any of the ones you have not categorized." They were not going to talk about anything that we truly expected. This was just like the Congressional report that came out. Just enough to say you did something. Mr Gallagher put them on notice about the nukes at Malmstrom, yet these guys act like they don't know, then, not their area, like two of the three stooges...then, Krishnamoorthi asked if they have communicated to a craft to say, "you are trespassing" or "yo dude, whazzzzz upppp?" They dully said "no"...lol...if all about defence, and they are new to earth...wouldn't we want them to know that was a considered threat? How would they know??Just good manners!

[@Doxymeister]

I think we all caught the Malmstrom thing--if you're forming a new taskforce to investigate potential national security threats, Malmstrom AFB incident should be one of the top examples of why this is necessary, in addition to the RAF Rendelsham Forest incident, others like them. Both incidents involved our nuclear program, many military members including high-ranking individuals, and Rendelsham had observations up to within touching distance. How could these individuals in this hearing NOT know about these incidents? Those of us that have military background understand the need for operational security, protecting sources and means. But, we're not idiots either. We know that our government hides a LOT of stuff behind "national security" that doesn't belong there, including things that simply embarrass the government. Anywho, I'm glad they called for doing away with the ridicule and public stigma of UFO reporting, but I didn't get a warm fuzzy feeling from this hearing either.

[@milky55way2012]

National Public Hearing that's a disgrace to US citizens. Gerald Ford is rolling over in his grave.

[@autopilot3176]

There was no "Mach 60 maneuvers". Those morons haven't read official report, it was ice falling from the top of radar's grid surfaces, at the speed of Earth's gravity. When you run* it against 80000 feet radar limit to sea-level, you get exact time. Perfect match. And Fravor saw Russian submarine launching Mach 2.9 jamming decoy, that's why he yelled "I'm engaged! I'm engaged". The rest is bunch of added BS, you know, the pile of sh** that accumulates when you add years to the morons. It's by formula: Morons + Years = Major BS

[@mrterrywatkins]

Waste of time? He got a shot in at white people, shame shame

[@myplacecaterers]

Transparency now officially has been redefined. What a disgrace.

[@yoshiworkmusic]

Transparency is the government showing videos of UFOs and discussing it on a national platform. Looks pretty good to me.

[@incognitoburrito6006]

Imagine the videos they haven’t shown us yet. I wonder what was shown in the closed hearing

[@kylecrane5751]

I'd always thought my astronomy teacher thought I was crack pot when I told him about what I've seen. Wild that a few years later the government finally admits this phenomena exists.

[@geronimo5537]

I've seen a white silver one almost looked like a large long stubby almond shape. It was no more than 50ft away. This was back in the late 90s. There are lots of fakes out there. But I won't forget this one.

[@trekkiejunk]

What are you talking about? Everyone knows that we sometimes see weird things in the sky, usually at night...weird lights, fast moving phenomena, etc. In many cases, it's a simple explanation, and in others, a more complicated one we haven't figured out yet. What we definitely know is that any alien travelers have no way to get to us, unless they are traveling for hundreds of thousands of years. That makes atmospheric reflections, weather balloons and camera anomalies far more likely.

[@adhd_daddy9501]

Not them trying to stop the video on the frame with the UFO… 😂

[@ricardomoseley]

I rolled my eyes to the fullest. I thought I should have slapped myself.

[@plower9711]

What a disgrace! I laughed out loud a couple of times...

[@Bullntheheather]

Did anyone hear you or is this a if a tree falls in the forest scenario?

[@ryansmurda1552]

It was a disgrace. I would respect them if they just came out and said this is all top secret and we're not sharing it with the public. Instead they put on this show and act like thry are trying to be transparent.

[@tomsanger963]

Send your info to them and they will relay to the Ministry of Truth in order to determine how much solitary confinement time you will get.

[@danceit5245]

Me too brother 😅

[@beaulin5628]

@@tomsanger963 Clever.

[@christopherruebsam9200]

They truly believe that we are all stupid. Just say it for heaven sake and let's move forward from there. Whatever it is, it's real, and we all deserve to know what the next steps are. This has been going on for far too long.

[@ryanlee6042]

They keep talking in circles. They know what these things are.

[@mariaspencer8515]

this was worth 50years wait?NOT!

[@cattdaddy1036]

Me: I'd like to know what you have discovered. Them: we'll save that for a closed session....

[@Castcire]

All the good stuff will be talked about in the close hearing. When do we get that information?

[@Head-Gein]

The fact that they're actually having these hearings is interesting in itself.

[@UrMomsFavSnack]

Let’s discuss!😌

[@Head-Gein]

@@UrMomsFavSnack In the past, the gov dismissed sightings and people have been mocked or discredited for not have movie quality evidence (why are the images always shaky or bad quality etc) now more and more high profile credible witness's are coming forward and being taken seriously. Also, I've noticed that scientists are less reluctant to admit there's life out there. They are very careful with their wording but they are starting to acknowledge that the universe is a big place and it's perfectly reasonable to assume that intelligent life may have evolved elsewhere as well.

[@UrMomsFavSnack]

@@Head-Gein So true! I can’t believe our kids will be learning that they are not the only intelligent life in the Universe🤯

[@RpMAliMoh]

They didn't say anything, if that's all they got for public after all that precious tax payers money...... then idon't know what to say... they should be terminated to end this wastage of money ...

[@sderman2]

They said they almost crashed in to them 11 times.

[@KeefyKat]

it should move to an academic group, like Project Galileo. Military are using this to fund better sensors, and that's reasonable. since the best evidence just isn't good enough.

[@sangbeom6245]

They said a lot of interesting things if you know what to look for...

[@sangbeom6245]

@@sderman2 that's like a WTF moment...

[@TFOTLITBOK_P1_7]

But 30 plus trillion in debt just isn't enough. That alone tells you can't trust them. Thieves and liars the whole lot of them.

[@AngeloXification]

They're studying incidents but haven't heard of high profile cases????? I call BS they even mention data not being held within the UAP TF, and where is the airforce how are they not represented in this briefing

[@TheHighlanderprime]

That’s what makes this feel like a sham of a conference … You can’t speak about this subject today as though all of the historical cases and evidence are irrelevant. This meeting can’t just ignore all previous evidential narrative and reports including the testimonials.

[@annslow41]

"where is the Air Force how are they not represented in this briefing" The Department of Defense (DoD) consists of all US military branches. To your other points, the fact seems they are at least moving in the right direction: to increase detection technology and hopefully transparency. The fact that it is even being talked about now is still huge. And so long as the are moving in this direction we will eventually learn something interesting

[@milky55way2012]

They're back in Colorado looking at a new way to explain Roswell now!

[@damartimantilla]

None of the data presented in the report comes from the Air Force. None! How is that possible?

[@tomsanger963]

Yeah, golly we're sorry that we never heard of the most well known case of the UFO visible above a nuclear facility shutting down all the missile capabilities. Love it that he said if we can get someone in a position of authority to have interest in that we may take a look at it. The congressman said well I'm in a position of authority. Classic!!

[@sinisterchin1592]

You’re telling me that in a hearing regarding UAPs, our laptops can’t play and pause (or even scrub frame by frame) to adequately show congress the objects themselves? Oh boy…

[@Mrcheekymonkeyisback]

closed Congressional hearing. uhhhhuh. all in the name of national security. this excuse is getting so old

[@dr_slice]

Any time an intelligent and well thought out question is asked the response is we will discuss that in the classified briefing. What a damn joke.

[@sdsfgfhrfdgebsfv4556]

actually it's always dismissed as conspiracy theory

[@alibikes]

It can’t be helped….it’s the nature of the beast

[@2001Artfull]

It seems that the UAP task force is going out of its way to avoid giving the public any new information. Compared to Blue Book they are just a little further from the 50 yard line but the intent remains the same. The cover up continues.

[@VG-rj8pn]

Ufo not uap its objects not phenomena don't pander to their idiocy!

[@sithe0]

I would love to know why they are covering it up. They’ve gone to great lengths to do so, they aren’t doing it just to annoy us. I believe there are multiple reasons / potential issues they are concerned about when choosing to reveal what they know. National security is probably the top reason as they mentioned, but they may also be fearful that full disclosure could cause societal unrest and/or lead to the American public loosing faith in the US government. My guess is that they are slowly drip feeding us info in an effort to give us time to process everything.

[@dyc3r925]

@@VG-rj8pn While the distinction is silly, I suspect part of the reason for this shift in terminology is to mitigate the stigma associated with UFO -- which is essentially synonymous with extra terrestrials.

[@AnDy-paints]

@@sithe0 THEY don't want us to be aware of the zero point energy systems until the global population has been reduced and their control over the remnant is firmly established.

[@beaulin5628]

@@sithe0 I don't think they ever tell the truth about anything.

[@stevejohnson5078]

Shouldn’t this mean that all of the 400 unexplainable instances we have that DON’T display/give away our secret monitoring equipment, should be released? Meaning that any evidence we have that’s through a camera/video camera or military equipment that ISN’T top secret or has already been displayed, should be shared with citizens/tax paying Americans?

[@mikeyswag123456]

I thought this too. I thought the reason was that MOST of these cases are "explained" by technology that cannot be disclosed. Meaning the technology we use to categorize UAPs isn't something we can reveal.

[@matthewhoude1399]

@@mikeyswag123456 Unfortunately true. However, now that everyone has a cellphone, including pilots (as you can see from the "flyby" video that was shown), there are a literal fuckton of quality videos of legitimate UAPs that could be disseminated, without risk of natsec violations. They (the Pentagon) will drag this out for as long as possible. Cat is out of the bag, and further obfuscation only hurts the DoD and public trust in our institutions.

[@matthewhoude1399]

That said, there are videos taken from pilot's cellphones that are MUCH better, longer, and more detailed than the trash they decided to show.

[@sdsfgfhrfdgebsfv4556]

they never care about the tax payer, otherwise you'd know about the secret projects and where your money goes

[@miketabacco5436]

I would think so, yea.

[@heythere135]

Literally everything I heard here that I wanted to know more about will be discussed in a “closed session”. What a surprise

[@Prettynickle]

Blah blah blah we're gonna start a new committee fully committed to blah blah blah. Good grief. Don't waste your time.

[@tyg_jericho_clark9149]

I literally screen recorded the video and was able to catch the frame they were trying to catch. Either they need some you people in there or they’re purposely not trying to catch it lol. No way our government doesn’t have any technology equal to that of an iPhone 💀

[@Dr_Peeper_ICU]

Ignorance. People who don't actually know tech are just oblivious. We ran into this in the Rittenhouse trial when pictures were "shared" to the defense instead of attaching. Anyone who knows tech knows there is a high chance the pics would be resized for a smaller attachment whereas attaching the actual source file sends the original. Though the State in that trial did some very shady stuff, I truely believe that issue was actually just total ignorance fueld by how people share to social media from their Gallery. Because I know tech and I've seen that so many times that I never share from my Gallery to Email. My Samsung Android does not do it, but iPhones are famous for it. More the reason those phones are for saps who don't know tech. EDIT. Yea I just got to that point, total ignorance and zero cluw what they are doing. Nobody in the room had the sense to even slow down the speed of the video in VLC Media Player. And these are the fools who write our lawsn. Just saying.

[@Doxymeister]

@@Dr_Peeper_ICU Thank God the defense in that case had a younger helper running their tech--she was one that caught that business of resizing, etc., and brought it to everybody's attention. And I was stunned that the judge didn't throw that whole footage out as inadmissible evidence, but I think that's another example of simply being ignorant of modern tech. I just don't think the judge really understood exactly why that footage should have been thrown out, aside from the fact that it seemed the "Evidence Fairy" dropped it in the state's lap in the middle of the night well into the trial. That judge also seemed to miss how prejudicial it was to have media-sourced footage that was clearly labeled with terms like "white supremacist" or "militia"--did he really not know how the jury's minds could be subliminally affected by labels that were added to the footage by unknown sources after the fact (his attorneys should have raised a stink!)? Anyway, rant over, LOL--our judicial system is clearly WAY behind the curve when it come to modern tech.

[@how2pick4name]

I had it on here, < and > are frame back/forward on KZbin. =) It's VLC player, it's a tricky beast with frame by frame. :D It's not in the interface by default, the hotkey is E and you can only skip forward. So it's just incompetence not knowing the player.

[@whatabouttheearth]

The Intelligence Community is just using VLC 😂😂😂

[@longdaysandhardworkatramra8260]

It was VLC media players fault, it sucks at scrubbing.

[@michaelproctor8100]

I thought for sure someone would have brought up one of the most famous sightings of all time, the lights over Washington, DC incident from July 1952.

[@Rednaxela1]

I think I saw a young Senator Ford in a committee days later demanding answers. 70;years later - here we are

[@christinedockler9380]

Thats the one i want to know about too.

[@geronimo5537]

Wasn't there one over LA to back in like 1942 or something? Where the city anti aircraft batteries were all shooting it.

[@michaelproctor8100]

@@geronimo5537 Nobody brought up Kecksburg either.

[@teganbouchard3992]

@@geronimo5537 I’m pretty on board with aliens, but I can see how the 1942 sighting could have been a hysteria. It was during WW2. We had just started the year before. Was there something up there? Maybe? It seems more likely this is one that got out of control over something mundane.

[@beagletoe]

If this were a serious hearing, Bob Lazaar would be testifying.

[@gwills9337]

Rename element 115 to Lazarium!!

[@Rapman21]

So this meeting seems like it wasn’t worth the cost to air condition the room and pay the salaries for the time involved. Sounds like a couple of guys just want to milk the “job” for as long as they can.

[@avokello]

"wasn't worth the cost to air condition the room" is my new favorite remark, thank you

[@AmericaAndAllies]

When you want to hide information from the public simply label the data, no matter how mundane, as a "national security issue".

[@SoulofAlice]

Or when you really already have decided that the unknown is a security threat and must have its strengths checked so we can counter...nevermind the actual trying to honestly be a fact gathering group. To learn and share and decide based after.

[@SuperLuminalElf]

An Ancient Tactic.

[@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269]

John 3:16 New International Version 16 For God so loved(A) the world that he gave(B) his one and only Son,(C) that whoever believes(D) in him shall not perish but have eternal life.(E) 🙏!

[@tomsanger963]

true

[@needparalegal]

At least UFOs are not mundane...

[@isaachartsell]

So according to what I’ve read about the speed of these things, they can go 30% the speed of light. Which means they can reach nearest star system in 5 days.

[@johns2339]

If they are capable to track on radar and visually see an object, I have trouble believing that this is all they can do. Many years ago it was known that NSA or other departments had the ability to zoom a satellite camera down to a bikini on a beach. With the many more sophisticated satellites now, and some of them containing much more sophisticated cameras, I would think if there were some available to this new department they should be able in real time zoom in on a reported object and location to get a very good picture or video. Or possibly go back in time, like going backward on a video, to that location at a particular time to get a picture or video of it.

[@jamespython5147]

The first satellites could read a newspaper.

[@JamesXcapesNY]

Ok, so that was a waste

[@nickfanzo]

And your taxes

[@sophiedunn4661]

Full disclosure now

[@oneonlynono]

Hi ... is there any link where we can Watch the Congressional Hearings happening on the 19th April 2023 Live , which is tomorrow ? Please

[@richard_loosemore]

What a gigantic waste of time. Every question dodged. Carefully rehearsed lies trotted out with monotonous regularity. I especially loved the way that the question about the missile silo being taken offline, and the question about the Admiral Wilson Memo, were both dodged with the reply “No, I don’t think I’ve ever heard about that.” It’s like the brief for the UAP Task Force was “Go find a patch of nice soft earth, stick your heads down in that earth for two seconds, then go back to your offices and report on all the UAP evidence you gathered during those two seconds that you had your heads in the ground.”

[@rlee1403]

What did you expect? The fact that it happened at all was a fuckin miracle

[@subrosa7716]

true- lower your expectations, they will NEVER disclose the actual truth.

[@cletusjones9411]

I didn’t expect anything, but still disappointed.

[@jesseglass5674]

"We're people just like you...we're the American people and we want to know too."" One of the first things we need to do is insist on clear, direct communication without the jargon, without the meaningless asides and word games, without a slow, drawn-out drone of double-talk and condescension. We do not need to see videos of obstructed sky and a commentary of "That's all we usually get!" with the hint of a smile. We do not need a rehashing of the obvious, a restating of a mission statement that has been stated over and over again. We do not need the false dichotomy of either we keep the American public (that's you, science-fiction reader! that's you with the supermarket tabloid) in the dark, or we risk the lives of our pilots and military men and women. Surely there's a middle way available. Surely clarity and direct communication must be called for. The American public includes many logical people seeking methodical, science-based answers who do not deserve such an embarrassing comedy act as a reply to their concerns. But then again...given our recent history....maybe it's just business as usual.

[@milky55way2012]

You are right in more ways than one.....as Stanton Freidman once said, "It's a Cosmic Watergate". Everyone should see the old video on you tube of the object caught on camera clear as day supposedly at Area 51 (most likely from S4) in broad daylight. Two objects bound together flying above the buildings in a circular motion going up the landing area that stretches a couple of miles. That video existed sometime in the past but now seems more likely to have been removed. Obviously leaked by someone from the base.

[@dremartin8878]

"Drawn out drone of double talk" well said buddy... Just a lot of jargon for the sole purposes of trying to promote transparency...F O H !!!!!

[@jmier6237]

HERES ALL THE PROOF WE NEED... PATENT NUMBER US20060145019A1

[@miketabacco5436]

Insist? And how would we insist. Smh

[@Beltran1]

I’ve personally had two different experiences myself seeing UFO first being a orange orb dropping from the sky at travel speed at in angle! It came to a complete stop in the middle of the sky motionless. for a few minutes, before shooting on its side and again coming to a complete stop. Right before it shot straight up to the sky it bounced in a zig zag motion ! I’ve also had a second experience with witnesses who saw a boomerang shaped object hovering/gliding with blueish/white lights coming from underneath it glowing separately clearly giving the shape of this UAP! It was at a low altitude. No sound.

[@TheHighlanderprime]

We’re a long long way from civilian experiences being acknowledged as evidenced by this presentation; they can’t even acknowledge the data that their own pilots and systems have exposed.

[@PRAJWAL.Y]

@A B wake up from ur dream 😂

[@dannydemonic4799]

@@PRAJWAL.Y does this really seem that far fetched?

[@ovidiumihuti7078]

@@PRAJWAL.Y I'm sure you are a Biden lover and live a delirious life...It seems that you brain lacks capacity of comprehension...

[@Jose-sx6gp]

@@PRAJWAL.Y people like u are scared to believe the truth

[@anasalkozaiy8060]

The closed session questions are so good

[@TheHighlanderprime]

The Navy’s representative only focused on the vague, resolved or irrelevant videos … Why not show us the videos that are substantive with a clearer direction that warrants more interest?

[@milky55way2012]

The one taken at Capal Green in 1980s would be a start......

[@TheHighlanderprime]

@@milky55way2012 Yes, there are so many past examples … But this current Pentagon leadership seems clueless about the government’s own historical data on the subject.

[@whatabouttheearth]

Because it is their technology or that of other nations simmilar and they're playing a cat and mouse game disguising what they do and do not know. There was a gap between overt and covert technologies that began in WW2 that created an offset between the ability of covert technologies and overt technologies, and the offset only expanded throughout the cold war. It's man made. There is not break evidence that proves these are anything other than man made, only stories and conjecture. They are not trying to piss off the public by revealing a huge technological offset of an over thirty years development gap.

[@dannyhartsell6156]

How can we trust our own government.

[@phoebeandem8015]

The etymology of the word government is literally "to steer". Trust your self

[@beaulin5628]

We can't. "Remember Afghanistan."

[@salaheddinealshaheed5266]

Not only your government bruv..we cant trust the European onces over here aswell. governments are never transparant towards the people..never has never will be

[@benstevinson764]

TRUST NO ONE

[@tom4od]

All I learnt is the truth won’t be coming from government

[@Rednaxela1]

Are they analysing flight pattern choice / decisions or just tracking physical attributes like appearance and evidence of propulsion?

[@johnpaulthegrim]

10 minutes fumbling around trying to get a freeze frame of that orb… zero preparation. This is ridiculous. You blew it. Why not show what’s been recorded during the ISS live feeds? 50 years to prepare video and video stills…

[@Fullmetal_christo]

Yes dude, you hit the nail squarely on the head in this comment. You would think they’d be more prepared to blow congress’ mind, but nope. Just “zoomer intellect and technology

[@beaulin5628]

These are the people who gave us the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal: 20 years of blood, suffering, pain, death, money, and military equipment totally wasted! What would we expect from such superb incompetents?

[@ryansmurda1552]

This was such a waste of time. They are never going to have public transparency on this issue. I thought it was funny when the guy asked him about the incident about the ufo over the nuclear weapons facility and he told him they weren't looking into that. What a bunch of BS.

[@milky55way2012]

Robert Salas for one of many

[@notmyrealname9110]

Oh wow. What great transparency.

[@jondojondo5115]

This guy Bray is there only to piss in our faces. Where is the full Nimiz footage.

[@YaYa_1435]

This is bullchit. I've seen more Ufos or ifos than these people on the panel.

[@Digetydog3]

WE ALL KNOW THEY ARE REAL AND OUT THERE! CANT FOOL ANYONE ANYMORE

[@ericsullivan3642]

Out off every video they could have brought to this hearing what they brought clearly demonstrates they have no inclination of leveling or being honest brokers.

[@kingdong7517]

OMG the US military uses Windows Media Player to analyze UFOs. The aliens must be pissing themselves with laughter.

[@kaospat4173]

took me one try to get the footage stopped at the right time.....on youtube🤣

[@michaelkeen7367]

That was despicable. All they did was tell us the same things we've been hearing on other platforms and TV shows. What a joke!!!

[@beaulin5628]

Blah, blah.

[@xPhilz0r]

I almost sensed a bit of hesitation when Ronald Moultrie mentioned the underwater/sea/subsurface domain. Its no real secret they have sensors underwater for adversarial submarines etc so I wonder if there may be more they are detecting.

[@matthewhoude1399]

There have been subsurface domain detections of non-cavitational sonar tracks moving upwards of, at least, mach 2. We've never been capable of that, and probably won't be. At least in the foreseeable future. Make of that what you will.

[@matthewhoude1399]

Keep in mind that the speed of sound is significantly higher in water.

[@zabisworld]

@@matthewhoude1399 how can speed of sound be higher in water?

[@zabisworld]

@@matthewhoude1399 where do you get your info from?

[@matthewhoude1399]

@@zabisworld Sound waves travel at a speed relative to the medium in which they propagate. Water is much denser than air, allowing for faster transmission of sound waves. The speed of sound in water is about 1,500 meters/sec, compared to a meager 340 meters/sec in air. The density of the medium is the main factor, but temperature also plays a significant role. This information is all publicly available, and very pertinent to the topic at hand.

[@hippieparents420]

1:01:20 - 1 : 01 : 32 I would love to hear that closed session 😂👽

[@erickelly4630]

One real question, are the uap related to under water phenomenon. Answers: that would be better discussed in closed session.

[@ryanreed38]

I think that question was about underwater detection capability, and it was likely deferred to closed session because those “capabilities” are within our nuclear submarines, and they’re not going to discuss those capabilities in open session. Nor should they.

[@MohamedHassan-cm8ni]

@Ralph Buchwitz because grey aliens have ufos bases under sea

[@WoodlandChill]

@@ryanreed38 Plausible

[@jbw8471]

Half the UFO sightings throughout history have been lables as USOs. Just look up Michael Schratt and his work on both man made and extraterrestrial vehicles. He explains it pretty well. Lots of cases that deal with the USOs.

[@KendallFalk]

Yes they are, but also “underground”. There are tunnel networks around the world.

[@ceceoo3]

Well at least it's a start but why does it have to be part of the closed session as to whether or not they have equipment to monitor underwater aerial phenomenon? Ugh

[@js70371]

I imagine it has to do with the US Navy nuclear sub fleet and underwater drone program which has always been to the utmost secretive in every way.

[@point177]

They would inadvertently reveal our capabilities which could compromise our readiness against foreign powers

[@jbw8471]

@@js70371 Wonder if that Sub ran into a USO a few months back or and underground mountain. Makes you wonder with all that technology they have how they missed that.

[@ceceoo3]

@@js70371 I thought about that right after I commented but still they could've said a simple yes or no with more details in the closed session or the public will never have any real answers.

[@MC-of7ow]

The great deception is coming, many are already falling for it

[@usafairmanlord]

My take away is regardless of these UAP's being man made or extraterrestrial the general public will never become privy to such knowledge due to it's security classification. It's laughable that the organization in charge of investigating such doesn't even have the proper clearance to make official inquiries with other agencies who maybe developing these crafts which would explain the importance of collecting sensory data over the eye witness event (hence why they are no longer interviewing non-military observers). If these crafts are man made that sensor data would only be of value to the developers, not transparency/disclosure. However, If these crafts are truely from out of this world, I only ask as did Mr. Welch "what are you protecting" at that point? Seems to me "they" can undermine the US government, its people, and the entire world at any given moment.

[@Jodiasmr]

These people literally talked in circles without saying anymore than, we have an object of some shape, size, that is being observed…..and???

[@allenfamily8445]

I get the sense that infomation is slowing being released in a measured way to prepare the public for something in the future. I have no idea what that "something" might be. Ooby Dooby and "Send more Chuck Berry."

[@milky55way2012]

Look up Carol Rosin

[@tomsanger963]

Interesting that the hearing began with the BS threat of white supremacy with this being the threat of UAPs and nothing else about them. Makes me think they are going to create a false flag threat having to do with ETs. Good idea for them to do it before November.

[@geronimo5537]

Why do we need to look these up?

[@sdsfgfhrfdgebsfv4556]

@@milky55way2012 NO

[@milky55way2012]

@@sdsfgfhrfdgebsfv4556 Who cares?

[@Ajfjdk]

These things are absolutely real. There are several types of piloted craft. One in particular is the illuminating, glowing spheres in some sightings or videos you see that look like this 🧿. They appear to be individual observation craft. There is an entity inside each one, operating the craft (looks like a Grey 👽) . I know because I took a picture of one that was in a pilot’s video aired on a documentary series entitled “Unidentified”. He was flying his plane at night and saw a glowing, golden/amber like colored object flying alongside in the distance of his plane. I paused the program, took a picture from my phone, zoomed in, took out the glare and dimmed the glow and after some picture exposure adjusting you can clearly see what looks like a little grey entity, sitting inside. It has some type of apparatus on top of its head and you can definitely see the big eyes and what looks to be a black console with its long fingers on it as if it’s controlling it. It’s sitting in some type of a seat and staring at the plane. I was both amazed and stunned at the same time when I seen it after taking out the glow of the object. Im thinking maybe the bright glow is not only for them to see each other but to sorta blind the human eye from seeing them. It’s the same craft as seen during the day, but without the glow. Like a silverish white sphere. If you notice in the center of those you can see a head shape within the sphere. But, I dont know if the powers that be in the govt will reveal what these beings and UFOs are. I hope they do, because this is definitely real and I have my own pictures to convince me that these things are absolutely real. Go to my channel and Subscribe so you can see a few of the analyzed UFO pictures in the community tab. Subscribe, then refresh the page to see the Community tab. I posted them in there.

[@lindawisner3525]

Glad that they are still stepping up the game and research.

[@kvititoe]

waiting for them to say it's all "swamp gas"

[@beaulin5628]

I think they are full of swamp gas themselves.

[@invisiblecollege893]

"sources & methods" is the new "swamp gas"

[@chadstepanik6163]

The best naval intelligence people we have, at their own hearing: “Nancy, can you stop it there, we’re having a hard time pausing at the right spot,”

[@hastalavista723]

😂🤣😂

[@davide724]

Alien watching hearing from a mothership lounge tv: "This is disappointing. Perhaps we should postpone the full disclosure of our existence to humanity."

[@ChiNguyen-ur5fb]

Because they picked the worst videos on purpose and it shows. I feel like this was all watered down and talked around in circles and didn’t answer any real questions

[@dominicfreeman8028]

@@ChiNguyen-ur5fb the only way we will get to find out is to get to the private sessions they were mentioning... which will never happen for me in my lifetime

[@ProfessorLu]

Very true

[@mirelgoi7855]

If you still feel like there are missing pieces in the big picture, read the Allies of Humanity Briefings. This is from the summary: "The Briefings reveal that our world is undergoing an extraterrestrial Intervention by forces who, as demonstrated by their actions, are here to subvert human authority and to integrate into human societies for their own advantage. These forces represent non-military organizations who are here to seek human and biological resources. The Allies refer to these forces as the “Collectives.” The Collectives do not value human freedom. Because the Intervention is being carried out by small groups of intervening forces, it must rely primarily upon deception and persuasion to achieve its goals. The Allies Briefings describe in detail how this is being accomplished and what we must do to stop it. This extraterrestrial Intervention is being focused in four arenas: 1. It is influencing certain individuals in positions of power and authority in government, commerce and religion to cooperate with the Intervention through the promise of greater wealth, power and technology 2. It is creating hidden establishments in the world from which the Intervention can exert its influence in the mental environment, seeking to make people everywhere open and compliant to its will through a “Pacification Program” 3. It is manipulating our religious values and spiritual impulses in order to gain human allegiance to their cause 4. It is taking people against their will, and often without their awareness, to support an interbreeding program designed to create a hybrid race and a new leadership who would be bonded to the “visitors.""

[@thyhandrevolve]

Hogwash. I've read it. Furthermore, this briefing is meant for children. Do you want to see a UFO? First watch Steven Greer's documentary and go summon one. I've tested it, it actually works. If they (ETs) wanted to harm us. We wouldn't be here. It would've been ~Game. Set. Match. Ugh 😒

[@Helloimtheshiieet]

Lay off the weed or get some common sense

[@ericjohnson2162]

That's very eye-opening, thanks for sharing!

[@johnchapman5125]

Thank you, Mirel.

[@olfloridaboy]

Holy crap, they can't even locate on the video, and we wonder why we waste money trying to find them in the sky LHM.

[@missfknsunshine]

And still there is only one place for civilians to report to: the crabby old guy at "The International UFO reporting center". One dude taking EVERY sighting and making experiencers feel stupid. BRILLIANT!

[@Nola50]

Haha I talked to him once. He is crabby but he does call EVERYONE back. All by himself lol

[@missfknsunshine]

@@Nola50 I asked him for advice on making contact and he angrily scoffed "Okay ma'am I can't help you." And waved me off like a loon. Yet i managed to get the anomaly to drop close enough to ground level that all the dogs and coyotes in the area began howling

[@missfknsunshine]

@@Nola50 also not always. He DETESTS experiencers. I am one of the people he cannot stand, but also cannot disprove and I have others in my state watching the same exact areas of sky showing anomaly. So that guy perhaps should hire someone a little younger and less crabby to deal with intake

[@milky55way2012]

Take a listen to the people in the FAA at Chicago O'Haire airport denying a UFO report, just as you say, snickering. In fact, FOIA requests to the FAA shows they lied about the reporting of that case bold faced to a reporter. John Greenwald I think has those FOIA reports on "The Black Vault" website.

[@tomsanger963]

He's only crabby if you can't follow his simple directions to post a quality report. He'll write you a big thank you if you post all the details rather than "I was smoking a cigarette out on my back porch and I seen a light and then my dog Blue seen it and he run inside my trailer and then I didn't seen it no more." You'd be crabby too if this was most of the junk you got which is what he gets.

[@pamelsrivers7414]

❤Sounds like everyone is sticking to an arranged script.

[@ricardomoseley]

In no uncertain terms. Correct.

[@BasyNightshade]

it's very interesting how in discussing the "radiofrequency" he referred to the one inside the object as " entity " not " personal "

[@Cerehum]

Timestamp?

[@Commander-lh6ey]

So has E.T. finally feel we are ready to move to type 2 civ? I thought we are still at 0.72...

[@benm1993]

Probably wont see contact or govt admission to ET’s until 2040

[@CarlosNavarro-cp9go]

Pure talk....same as always

[@ITrendzI]

Let’s just be honest here. They’re going to keep saying we don’t know but we all know that they know more than they lead on. They most likely have great video of this phenomenon but because of how they obtained videos or photos they can’t release because of national security. So we’re just going to keep going in a circle until they shoot one down or capture one in some way but even then, do we really trust them telling us what it is..? Like say it’s an alien ship. Do they really want to let the world know that we’ve come in possession of one? This needs to be a global effort but we have monkey brains and it won’t happen.

[@happyapple4269]

They captured one back in the forties and have had many craft and bodies in their possession over the years..

[@joedoe302012]

Where is my banana

[@lukintagi]

Some groundbreaking footage needs to be leaked for this to change drastically

[@jmier6237]

HERES ALL THE PROOF WE NEED... PATENT NUMBER US20060145019A1

[@jeffbruin1]

Once the technology becomes unclassified, it’s likely easier to provide the data to population.

[@mrmagoo4182]

Pretending like they don't know anything, they must think everyone is stupid, after watching this people will trust the government even less than they do now

[@adampitman1144]

yeah this is underwhelming, In our day and age a lot more should be disclosed to public.

[@PointEndClick]

This video is awesome.

[@judydaggs3245]

You must be watching something different than what I saw. 🤔

[@tomsanger963]

Awesome like "nothing to see here move along"

[@advancedinterconnections4633]

They need technical staff on these meetings. Like seriously IT.

[@fuzzybuzzyman2804]

my first time Topeka Kansas 2019 July 4 I still can fully comprehend what i and others seen that night

[@MadRobexe]

Congressman Gallagher @59:26

[@lonnierosiere4657]

Congressman Gallagher was great, at least he knew something about the subject! He made them look stupid talking about specific cases they knew nothing about. He proved they have the guys running this new program. You could tell Gallagher has a true interest in the subject and wants to know what's up. Get that man in the Oval Office!!!

[@larryjackson5120]

They new they've just playing dumb

[@annslow41]

Gallagher's been listening to some Joe Rogan 😂😂 Def glad someone directly addressed "unnatural" phenomenons though

[@ashleyeldorado7750]

Yeah well he was the only one grilling them

[@charlenebedford3391]

YES!!

[@dreamhillresearch]

OMG Mr. Gallagher at 54 mins asks these intelligence officials if they are aware of the Malstrom AFB incident UFO shutting down 10 ICBMs in 1967 and in 2002 the Admiral Wilson transcript showing the head of intelligence being denied access to special access projects reverse engineering ET craft. This is mainstream stuff and they have no idea they claim! I know these where both real because I was one of the top secret military witnesses that testified with these witnesses before the mainstream media of the world at the National Press Club in Wash DC on May 9th, 2001 more than 21 years ago! You can look up both of these incidents on my timeline of online notes for 1967 and 2002 events on the web at ... the web matrix and the extension at the end of that web address is net

[@ruthcollins2841]

I saw one near Heathrow November 1979. It was reported by pilots, RAF Northolt personnel and the public. It could not be assigned to anything other than UFO.

[@miketabacco5436]

Meaning absolutely nothing. Just means we don't know what it was, ya dummy

[@mg7685]

Tip to the Navy: Get VLC Player. Pause video and use the Frame by Frame feature.