Full debate: JD Vance and Tim Walz vice presidential debate, hosted by CBS News

[@ShallowPocket]

What I get out of this debate is. I wish these men were running for President not vice president.

[@luisdaprodigy2208]

Seriously

[@Chreeves]

I would much rather cast a vote between these two, than the front runners.

[@Yulii113]

I wish they running to be president, not vice president……… Agree

[@Whosaids0]

Yep.🫡

[@LuisRivera25234]

I agree. They’re both civil and seemed to have respect for one another. I wish these two were running for president not vice.

[@SuperRoach007]

“No handshake. No handshake and there you have it” They shook hands as soon as they came onscreen you numb-nuts.

[@jj78rcclub]

Obviously they tuned in to something else lol

[@Wartinezzz]

Time stamp?

[@danthemagicalman]

@@Wartinezzz 4:59:10

[@mariaperez4167]

Actually twice.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Civil conduct cannot be ruled out in real interactions.

[@sleepyman6598]

This debate is so muchhhhhhhhhhh more professional than the previous one.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Still there is not this debate that sings for the future.

[@day_uh_um]

Maybe, but the moderators still felt the "need" to put their opinions in there occasionally. Not as bad as the Trump-Harris debate, obviously. What could possibly have been more biased than that one?

[@connorskudlarek8598]

@@day_uh_um that debate wasn't biased, you just can't accept the fact Trump is a lunatic who lies constantly. The moderators didn't have to correct the VP-candidates as much as they had to correct Trump, because they weren't outright lying as often.

[@margarethead2578]

@@day_uh_um only marginally better.

[@eiddon]

Trump wasn't at this one.

[@3kart3]

I dislike how the CBS people cut Senator Vance's explanation on asylum immigrants

[@ImperfectChristianWoman]

Yes it's an important issue. The moderators just wanted to correct him without explaining.

[@notarussianbot9435]

Typical MSM! Vance was a great pick from Trump! MAGA! 🇺🇸

[@MsRadar23]

We could still hear him 💪🏽

[@MrSnufullahfahgess]

I would expect nothing less from CBS.

[@pjlikesmusic]

A... civil debate...? In 2020's America?! Am I... am I dreaming?! 😳

[@coacht8121]

Frfr

[@Christmasprancer]

Frfr

[@ethanpolzin4181]

Fax bro these guys need to be running for president not VP

[@konankunoichi94]

it feels forced but i appreciate the simple debate for once, the good old boring "im a relatable guy whos just like you" is almost refreshing lol

[@danielsmithiv1279]

@@ethanpolzin4181 I was thinking JD Vance as Pres and Walz as VP. Good combo. Agreed on a lot of issues that we relate to.

[@arsenalhenry]

Previously underestimated Vance's debating ability...he was very professional

[@llamalinguist3250]

You should watch some of the one-on-one interviews he gives, minus the MSM gaslighting. He's always this way.

[@dishsoap1]

Yeah he’s a good speaker. They both are honestly.

[@CrystalSilva-i6p]

Nope he on criminal trump side so nope kamala team is the best

[@CMBTSports]

He’s a Yale lawyer. They’re damn good.

[@iaminpainauchocolat9300]

You're joking right?

[@bigfootgoesboom]

The moderators were terrible. You can’t make a claim as a moderator and cut the microphone of the candidate when they try to respond and give context to the misleading claim you’ve made.

[@michaelalbertson7457]

There seem to be no men who can moderate impartially, and these two women, they are partial, too. Dem stooges.

[@stormyweather9917]

Fake news CBS NEWS can.

[@darthkrator9366]

Foreal so annoying that is the reason why they won’t do a debate on fox or anywhere else that isn’t woke liberal

[@eliegrace]

Fact checking is not a misleading claim

[@Nishugram]

@@eliegracethe rules were they weren’t going to fact check and also their “fact” was false so it isn’t a fact check.

[@nickn2261]

I feel like Tim Walz is voting for Vance

[@chickennuggs7678]

Lmao

[@matthewandelliot1340]

He litterly led himself into traps

[@Dbh2208]

LMBO good 1

[@ttteclassic2994]

@@matthewandelliot1340 Did you watch the debate? While I wasn't happy with some of Walz's misrepresentations, practically every word out of Vance's mouth was a lie.

[@matthewandelliot1340]

@@ttteclassic2994 Point out the lies please, I am very interested in correcting myself.

[@ruthlewis8097]

Regardless of which side you are on, I am in awe of how respectful, professional, and frankly Presidential both of these gentlemen were. These 2 should be their respective party’s nominees. Great debate.

[@richardyahtzee2862]

Seemed like mostly waltz blaming Trump for all the issues they caused! No accountability nor responsibility for any actions!

[@MrStringSavvy]

Presidential debates all pretty much used to be this way. DT showed up with WWE energy in 2015 and nobody knew how to respond. Dignity and respect aren't as entertaining, but I forgot how much I missed it

[@mandiwells7653]

The fact Tampon Tim kept shaking his head. Nope. Unprofessional.

[@SLAMBANGO]

Vance is clearly a future president.

[@beachybird1251]

Did you miss when Vance hijacked the debate and ignored the format and the Commentators?

[@johnmurphy7674]

JD Vance is so good. I hope he'll be President someday

[@3BK235Y]

If Donald Trump does a good job and the American people is happy at the end of his mandate, it is absolutely sure that J D Vance will be the next President of the United States.

[@MostCommentsOnYouTubeAreAiBOTS]

I’m only 8 minutes in and am laughing my arse off that Tim Walz can’t even pronounce the word “nuclear.” He has said it many times, and each and every time he pronounces it as “nuculer.” 🤦‍♀️😂 What an embarrassing putz.

[@OCP_CORP_OFFICIAL]

Yessss

[@randycamacho7332]

Vance 2028 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@akshaysa1586]

Refreshing to watch a debate that is civil

[@curtiseisenbeis2484]

Absolutely! I actually had a lot of fun watching this debate!

[@TheRevoution19]

Civil

[@akshaysa1586]

​@@TheRevoution19 my bad

[@KeepItReels]

Now give Trump and vance what they wanted to give Pence.

[@tylerk3616]

Agreed. This debate was very good.

[@andred8037]

JD Vance is smoooooth as butter. This was fantastic and very educational.

[@sylviaspain8953]

Kamila does have answers to anything 😢

[@sylviaspain8953]

Go vance.great job

[@tobiasdenhollander3210]

*Nobody speaking* Nobody: The hosts: “your time is up!”

[@vampyreeyes]

Best coment ever...

[@jaesalsae11]

I thought that annoying too and silly by the host.

[@Heatherandson]

😂

[@Ray-bn1ry]

Foreal they would each be done talking and they still say their time is up like wtf just go on with the debate 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@kaos4564]

Using this meme format like a 90 year old man

[@jonclaycamp5099]

Loved it when CBS got checked…

[@CalmTFD]

That was a risk, but JD handled it well. The bullies learned their lesson.

[@Rjjamess]

Timestamp?

[@Apfle_3.1415]

JD straight up owned them. Very well done. “Yes, thanks for explaining the legal process of gaining asylum”… 🙄. What a B.

[@nightking5907]

5:28:16

[@cuculain78]

​@@Apfle_3.1415Yes Vance was being a B by bullying them and talking out of turn

[@chinesetabletennissupercyb725]

I'd like for our politics to return to THIS.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Never happens under Trump being party of the demise.

[@deanmthomson]

100%

[@MrMonsterKen]

@@nataliiateteruk585 Under trumps rule, it's paradise, not hell.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

@@MrMonsterKen fireball of paradise nuclear HELL.

[@celmart0413]

I prefer trumps way. I like when he doesn't take bs from anyone

[@OriginalSniperLol]

Vance is our next president after Trump. Let’s go USA!

[@randomhuman2595]

Hopefully not

[@MostCommentsOnYouTubeAreAiBOTS]

@@randomhuman2595 Why not?

[@NicholasToolsie]

Not gonna lie, JD Vance is probably one of the best candidates I've seen in a presidential debate. He is very well-spoken and comes across as very humble.

[@supermikeb]

Huh? He wouldn't say who won the last election. if Climate Change is a thing, or tell the truth on his stance for women's freedom (or lack of it) !!

[@Aussiebirds2024]

REMEMBER 🚨 even though he is polite and well spoken he is TRUMPS VICE PRESIDENT HE CANNOT BE TRUSTED HE IS SERIAL LYER

[@chriserony]

He’s still lying though. 😅

[@Aussiebirds2024]

@@chriserony what he lie about

[@tannorfosterfoster1978]

@@chriserony yeah he’s lying just like the people who said Biden was healthy 😂😂

[@emmanuelskyler1148]

I think the moderators lost this one. Both men performed professionally, but JD Vance was more precise in his answers

[@KnitzyKitzy]

No Vance lied and because no fact checking was agreed he was allowed to continue to do so throughout.

[@babygooboo9985]

@@KnitzyKitzythey fact checked him so he fact checked them right back he didnt lie he exposed them

[@KnitzyKitzy]

@@babygooboo9985 🤣

[@emmanuelskyler1148]

@@KnitzyKitzy I think Vance showed more honesty on display than Tim did. Remember when Tim stumbled in the debate about his visit to Hong Kong? In contrast, when Vance was called out on his hostile view of Trump in the past, he answered aptly by first acknowledging that he did have those views. Something Kamala can't even do

[@hobosnake1]

​@KnitzyKitzy you have very little critical thinking abilities and I find it sad. Why don't you think you got any likes here? Maybe you're just not seeing things for what they really are. Time to stop sipping that sweet liberal lemonade, because it's all cushy promises with no actual follow through. Trump isn't a flowery person, but at least he has followthrough.

[@amyw.7031]

I absolutely enjoyed this debate!!! It was civilized and understanding!! Not so much bickering so I loved the debate

[@garymorris1856]

Except that the moderators were CLEARLY on Walz's side.

[@sharondowns3606]

​@@garymorris1856 So true but what else is new?

[@maxnikolenko2302]

The only uncivilized people in this debate were the Moderators

[@garymorris1856]

@@sharondowns3606 Yes,, it's this way every time.

[@cathystanfill6446]

Me too (Enjoyed the debate)

[@Rufa-g]

Every time after JD makes a point, they gave walz a chance to respond immediately. Every time after walz says something, they ask JD another question so that he wouldn't have enough time to respond to what Tim said. Thank God JD is too smart to fall in to their trap.

[@Surawabatna-lz6nt]

Yes. the moderators are sick and disgusting, as smart people can see their intentions already.

[@Buoyant_Bear]

To be fair, while JD is very intelligent, these two moderators definitely have IQs in the double digits. I don't doubt that their primary objective was to sabotage Vance, that's been the MO this entire election...but they weren't intelligent enough to even pull that off. They let Walz say, "I've become friends with school shooters", and never ONCE thought to add, "Did you mean friends with victims of school shooters?" ... anybody halfway intelligent/decent would've offered that to either candidate.

[@eileenodonnell8376]

@@Surawabatna-lz6nt their intentions are to be fair and get the truth. That is what reporters do. Your ignorance and disregard for American values is sick and disgusting.

[@tyc6268]

@@eileenodonnell8376if you couldn’t see the bias here where it’s glaringly obvious then you probably get manipulated a lot without realizing it.

[@magdalenachwaja9516]

@Rufa: exactly

[@longeze]

Moderators, why can't you just ask a question and let the candidates answer? Why the pre- question commentary pretending to be a question?

[@gr33dyglutton]

Same reason they were trying to "fact check" Vance and not Walz even though the rules were no fact checking. Because they have a dog in the fight and they refuse to be neutral.

[@Sundae_Times]

Cope

[@spamtownhamilton6200]

I see the pre-question speaking by the moderators more as contextualization, to sort of clarify for the debaters what the focus of their response should be, but also (maybe primarily) for the benefit of the viewers, many/at least some of whom are not super up to date with current issues/news. So the contextual preamble can help to understand why we should care what they have to say about a given issue. More cynical take: they do it to draw out the length of the debate 😂

[@elvandin1]

@@spamtownhamilton6200 providing context = framing the issue in the way that they would prefer.

[@lionmanahawaii]

Exactly. It makes it OBVIOUS the democrats need MAJOR assistance to ATTEMPT to gaslight us.

[@wholesome_dani293]

Moderators need to ask the question and shut up. 🙄 Way to go Vance! 🇺🇸

[@rhondawi6389]

Yes! Margaret tried to break rules by fact checking vance

[@TacticoolVIKINGBeard]

You mean "fact checking" and yes i say that in quotations 😂​@@rhondawi6389

[@loril.ferguson549]

I Agree!!!!!!

[@marycull3607]

Margaret got giddy when she turned off the mics.

[@KeeIowa]

Actual good debate. Both sides making good points and being curious and respectful. Let’s have these two guys running instead.

[@ROSE_reddy]

I know 😅

[@Sundae_Times]

Do you have time stamps for Vance's good points? I must have missed those.

[@gabrielmccray3457]

​@@Sundae_Timesmy favorite point was Vance talking about tariffs for childcare. Lol but you can fool a lot of people if you're calm and confident.

[@CrystalSilva-i6p]

Nah one is on criminal trump side so nope we go with team kamala

[@Sundae_Times]

@@gabrielmccray3457 Funny you forgot to mention Trump's non-answer word salad when he was asked the same question.

[@helvieknives5053]

Vance was fabulous! I would vote for him as president.

[@violentmnky]

CBS: We won't be fact checking, we're going to let the candidates check each other. CBS: Just kidding.

[@jetsonmace]

Well said!🤣

[@Apfle_3.1415]

I’m glad that JD didn’t back down when fact checking the fact checkers

[@chaosunnn]

Make sure to go vote for Trump!

[@azedel7151]

@@chaosunnn Temprano.

[@jonathanfields4ever]

Good. Not fact checking is insane. You can’t let a habitual liar get away with lying

[@cherylmartin1740]

I'm so glad Vance came back and fact-checked the moderator.

[@chinesechance]

He made her look SO stupid!

[@fooly_grulee]

When?

[@AviMus82]

Time stamp?

[@eatanddrink8341]

27:26

[@queenbee9109]

Well done, JD Vance!! Good job!

[@Rout3Zer0]

Well done Vance and Walz both very professional 🙌

[@Dani4True]

JD is young, smart, driven, and intelligent!

[@servusgude1361]

I got hope some how

[@MostCommentsOnYouTubeAreAiBOTS]

@@Rout3Zer0 Walz is such a putz lol. And it’s crazy how much of a chronic liar he is. I’m soooo happy he and Harris lost. He’s an American embarrassment and I feel incredibly sorry for the people in the state that he governs. He is just as bad as the governor of my state (California).

[@r1sandman263]

I would vote for JD Vance immediately

[@Chreeves]

I'd rather vote between the VP's than the front runners.

[@chilltarts]

Right 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@tamagnobose608]

JD was very well mannered.

[@alexadams7771]

@@Chreeves watch trumps 2017 liberty university speech or his state of the union speechs or even his mount Rushmore speech he gave as president powerful,can't wait to have a real president again, TRUMP 2024

[@Chreeves]

@@tamagnobose608 he was.. didn't get flustered at all and Walz was flustered from the start.

[@roberttassone7676]

Go right ahead. The left loves spoiled ballots

[@brandon6759]

Good debate. If only the moderators didn’t think it was about them.

[@caitlynlivingston7272]

I think they think things are about them but this could hardly be it

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Moderators thought focus on their next question, not the debating answers.

[@cherylgarnham9819]

It's not!?! 😱

[@The77Voice]

Wouldve been better to just have a computer read a prompt and then let the candidates go. The only reasom moderators should exist is to encourage a candidate to give more clarity on something that wasnt explaimed well. ie. "When you said xyz did you mean x or y or z?"

[@nataliiateteruk585]

@@The77Voice they learn for every event. Too sad they are so rare in Ameirican policies to have clear debates.

[@MyLittlePonyTheater]

Honestly, there was 5 hours of pre-debate chatter. Why didn't they schedule the debate to be an hour or two longer instead to give these two more time to speak?

[@ghersic8161]

Damaging alarmist news network programming.

[@jackhenry290]

They don’t actually want the information out. That why they move on fast before the lies are exposed. Spend forever on abortion as filler.

[@Bertinator-nm9ld]

That's because no one watches the 5 hours of pre-debate chatter. No one has the attention span for that! You could make the debate longer, but fewer people would watch it. This is pretty much the longest you can get away with, while still retaining an audience

[@Kay.1117]

Jd Vance is such a class act. I’m SO relieved he is our VICE PRESIDENT!

[@jordash9992]

Take a shot every time she says "theres alot we need to discuss we have to move on."

[@bensimmons8613]

How hammered are you now??

[@nataliiateteruk585]

FOX News should have done a debate instead.

[@Susan-r6x5n]

Those women did not ask important questions. WALZ is strange.

[@DivinityIncarnate000]

@@nataliiateteruk585FOX news should be abolished

[@ChrisJ-96]

@@nataliiateteruk585they tried, headboard harris aggressively refused. They wouldn’t give her the answers before hand.

[@dudnika-anti]

this is like the polar opposite of the harris-trump debate. during that debate, i though both of them underperformed (and i still want another debate tbh), but with this one, both walz and vance held their own and did good. this one had a lot more substance than the previous one.

[@hmarie2494]

I didn't need to see a Trump Harris debate. We already know what each one of them are about honestly. They've each served a term. They are both stubborn as heck..I wouldn't expect a second debate to go any different!

[@Zociety6477]

It's wild how we got here. Both the VPs are more presidential worthy than the actual president candidates

[@hmarie2494]

​@@Zociety6477After world events that went on today...who do you feel like you'd want at the helm?

[@jasonwyman1873]

Well, Harris had a mountain of pressure on her, and she made a few decent arguments. Most importantly, she was able to put the attack dog in his place for the first time in any debate.

[@tamagnobose608]

@@jasonwyman1873 She had the 2 moderators to help her.

[@anthonyjohn981]

Thank you, moderators, for being so biased. You're the reason the mainstream media continues to crumble.

[@alexs6250]

The reason America is so split and hostile

[@countcampula]

24:30 "I believe senator Vance wants to solve this" So respectful

[@nicolasmartin8784]

That actually felt in parts… wholesome… 😮

[@replybobby]

Good performance by both JD and Walz, at least they were civil. But could not stand the bias and hypocrisy of the moderators. I think JD was very collected and made some good points.

[@danielreid6041]

JD is impressive

[@Holyblades1982]

Can these two just run together and forget about their bosses?

[@davidarkapaw3657]

Man....that would be solid

[@TimSlee1]

Yeah, and have RFK as the presidential candidate.

[@ahleawade5417]

Honestly can we just have jd as the president at this point

[@TimSlee1]

@@ahleawade5417 A reasonable person as president? Yeah, in our dreams.

[@ahleawade5417]

@@TimSlee1 why so negative ?

[@--6487]

I wish everyone would stop yapping about how civil the debate is and actually pay attention to the policy and rhetoric each candidate spoke about

[@neilchen4768]

Fr everyone is a robot and sheep. Why is everyone always creaming themselves in the comments when there’s a civil discussion

[@uberfu]

The SHEEPLE have been groomed to care more about appearance than substance unfortunately.

[@ingogotico1398]

No yapping. Got it

[@HomeByTheSeas]

Yo I farted dawg

[@JamesJones-i2v]

​@@HomeByTheSeasQueef

[@NSankeerthUrkec]

This was really Respectful ❤

[@margarethead2578]

Harris could learn from AWOLz

[@SolWaid1965]

Make America Respectful Again!

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Trump is like a crying whining child in comparison.

[@FLSugar]

minus the moderators

[@Susan-r6x5n]

The moderators were not respectful.

[@The77Voice]

Why did they upload this with 6 hours of commentary? Just clip the 90 minute debate and keep your opinions seperate.

[@Victorious8966]

Because the media needs to drive the narrative and ensure that you only seen what they wanted you to see. Take the edge off what was bad with Wally and sharpen up the corners on JD.

[@day_uh_um]

@@Victorious8966 Yup

[@goldy9227]

What a great debate. So respectful and so professional. No matter who I’m voting for, I applaud both vice presidential candidates for a job well done.

[@hillsided00]

This was one of the best vice presidential debate I ever witnessed. In the beginning I was very skeptical, because the media never gave a good impression of either candidate. But now I am glad I watched for an hour. Both candidates answered the questions based on what they believed. They respect each other and give their point of view. CBS hosts have done an outstanding job far superior than ABC. Previous presidential debate was dull and running away from the truthes. I always wondered why Americans could not come up with a better presidential candidate. But these two gentlemen were a class act.

[@tamagnobose608]

Those 2 ABC moderators ruined the only presidential debate....shame !

[@day_uh_um]

Compared to ABC... well, maybe, but that sets the bar so low! Being not quite as bad doesn't make it an "outstanding job".

[@ngritter]

Seriously? Debates are basically who can lie the best with no fact checking involved. Honestly need a better standard here.

[@rhondawi6389]

It was great, but Margaret did try to break the rules by fat checking advance so that did not go over very well

[@Janseria]

@@ngritter They were given an opportunity to fact check each other. Mainstream media has proven time and again that their so-called fact checking is just as often incorrect as it is correct.

[@melodysmith4254]

Both were very good. I thank both gentleman for serving our country. I pray Vance gets a chance to be Vise President and he excels to be our President in 2028!

[@icecold5707]

I hope JD at least runs for president in the future. MUCH better than the frontrunners of the past decade…

[@madgnome990]

Nope... the simple fact he would not condemn the idea of not certifying the election in 2020. Trump lost... it was a "yes" or "no" question. It went through the courts, the governors, and was proven there was no fraud. Vance is a good speaker and while he danced around a lot of the questions quite eloquently, made some good points, but that alone, should eliminate him. He will say whatever he has to in order to get power... I mean... we can't go from American Hitler to he is a "good guy" and it was the press' fault...

[@Bertinator-nm9ld]

Frontrunners, with an s? That implies that more than just one Republican has been running, in the past decade.

[@PittsburghPenguin]

THIS is how a debate should be. Both were gentlemen. There was no unnecessary mudslinging. There was no childish trash talk. Both mostly let each other get their points in without stepping on eachother. They were civil, respectul and dignified to one another. Just two men who were arguing why their candidate was better for the country, and why they disagreed with one another policy wise. It was refreshing to see. Much respect to both. My hope that we can get back to this has been restored due to these two. Just wish THEY were our candidates.

[@flaskandpen]

Satisfying and focused debate. I appreciate both men.

[@flaskandpen]

Follow up: I will say, I don't get why Vance keeps saying Harris has had the chance and should do things NOW... she is VP, not President. Since when do VP's have equal power to the president?

[@flaskandpen]

aaaand NOT being willing to say that the 2020 election was legitimate... my God. I withdraw my former statement. Vance is a liar and a danger.

[@TitoTabz]

​@@flaskandpenthe VP is tied to the hip with the president and many have argued that Biden was centre left but governed as far left, a position that Kamala has always been associated with. Therefore, we can assume she was really in charge, also supported by the fact Biden aged too much and wasn't up for the job any longer.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

The Real president's should be taking another direction altogether.

[@day_uh_um]

@@nataliiateteruk585 Do *you* know who the "Real" president is? More like who's actually running this regime, anyway?

[@FarmerJebadiah]

I firmly believe if JD Vance was running for president he would not pick trump as his running mate 😂

[@rickcaldwell2862]

...and everyone in the Dim Party wanted Harris off the ticket just a short time ago.

[@yukihirasouma4691]

You're high on coccaine bot.

[@lovetogarden2664]

You funny too! Donald J. Trump did tremendous things for our Nation and for our family while President of the U.S. Under the Biden/Harris administration we're in a far worse place. Open thine eyes to the TRUTH that is all around you!

[@loukreu]

Vance plus Rand Paul or Thomas Massie would be amazing.

[@logawinner]

@@loukreuEven Kennedy

[@aznbro5559]

This is actually a good debate against both parties wow so much respect towards each other

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Better than how Trump wants his debates.

[@jillybean3227]

This is the most professional and respectful debate I've ever seen. Vance was a rockstar, IMO. I had never really seen him speak at length. And despite my thoughts about Walz, and his inconsistencies with the truth, I am honestly impressed by his performance. I applaud both gentlemen for the way they approached this debate. May God watch over We The People. We don't have to agree on everything, and it's ridiculous to think we ever could. But I wish we could all get past the BS and work together to make our country stronger, and our lives easier.

[@khiemtran6989]

Tim Walz look so nervures, on the other JD Vance is very calm and confident.

[@Gee2Td]

Because even Tim Walz knew he was speaking a bunch of bologna

[@eileenodonnell8376]

@@Gee2Td other way around. Vance lied and lied

[@Gee2Td]

@@eileenodonnell8376 You must be a close friend of one of these biased "fact checkers"

[@Cliohna]

@Gee2Td No, eileenodonnell8376 is correct. Vance lied a lot without turning red. Just because Vance is calm doesn't mean he is correct, it makes him more dangerous. Because people (like you for example) equate calmness with being correct. He promotes Trump and being tough and firm on issues, yet he is and was so wishy washy on issues.

[@josiemoe]

That’s because JD Vance has actually had to answer hard questions by reporters/anchors.

[@isaiahmiramontes9156]

“No hand shake” second after they did a hand shake 😂

[@factsonly4124]

Walz initiated the handshake 😂

[@MartinHu7]

@@factsonly4124Review it again, on the video there is no way to recognize who start the handshake. Please don’t tell the lies.

[@bendingdemon6483]

@@MartinHu7 It doesn't matter who started it but it definitely looks like Walz did. Don't get butthurt now.

[@insoporous9978]

The post-debate discussion? I only watched till the guys walked off stage. Commentators were referring to the Trump - Harris debate I'm pretty sure.

[@emilymathews7073]

Ooof he’s handsome

[@troydulude]

It made her happy to cut that mans microphone, she could hardly contain herself.

[@amyellen3845]

Me too. He shouldn't feel entitled to speak over her. It shows his problematic upbringing.

[@stephen7690]

​@@amyellen3845she should stick to the rules then

[@ShallowPocket]

@@amyellen3845 Woman cannot have it both ways. Fragile when men explain something but yet girl boss. If you want to be equal and gain respect then dont be fragile and biased.

[@troydulude]

@@amyellen3845 are you sniffing glue or something? That you think that is what happened there it shows me your upbringing was "problematic". As giddy as she was shows a clear bias and disqualifies her from moderating. Her co-moderator very clearly did not approve of her reaction. It was very unprofessional.

[@bakedandsteaked]

​@@amyellen3845typical L woman take lol

[@rosalindsugumar219]

I can see JD Vance becoming the next US president easily

[@nilotf72]

I'm not a huge Vance fan but I like that he challenged CBS when they tried to fact check him with propaganda (the Haitian immigrants question) and he insisted on not letting that slide.

[@nmarie822]

He lied and admitted to lying

[@astrosloth3966]

​@nmarie822 there are several videos of this. I'm from Canada and there are migrants poaching salmon from creeks. Taking ducks from ponds. There is absolutely an assimilation problem.

[@nmarie822]

@@astrosloth3966 sure jan

[@Bertinator-nm9ld]

Essentially saying "the rules were that you weren't supposed to stop me from lying" was certainly an interesting strategy, from Vance

[@sergeantjoe6802]

Nah he's saying the truth about those haitian immigrants. They are "legal" because of a wand wave. This is what you call white lies and bullcrap semantics policy. Vance is correct and compared it against a legal immigrant who waited ten years to get here.

[@judechidozieezenyi9493]

"We have a lot to get to." 😊 "We HAVE a lot to get to." 😊 "WE HAVE A LOT TO GET TO." 😊 Jesus. 😨

[@jmatter7765]

They’re not lying… 3.5 years hasn’t been long to do all the DAMAGE they still have left to do to this country.

[@jmatter7765]

They still haven’t quite learned how to HIDE their bias; until then, the moderators will just have to disguise it.

[@zargal-n5n]

We have a lot to get to->"Jan 6"- asked in every debate already and in every tough interview Vance has taken. If JD had filibustered more maybe he could've avoided the worst part of the debate for himself.

[@judechidozieezenyi9493]

@zargal-n5n But watch how they'd have forgotten all those things they had to get to in order to squeeze out everything they could from that exchange if he filibustered. Imagine if JD Vance was the person answering the Hong Kong question. She'd never have let it go with the whimper she did with Walz.

[@zargal-n5n]

@@judechidozieezenyi9493 To be fair to her, I think that was one of the few times they actually pressed Walz on an answer (they did so to JD multiple times) and let him twist in the wind. And I was mainly joking about filibustering, you're right that they would have made Vance look terrible. But just looking through the topics it's no wonder they wanted to rush through the first few issues: 1-Iran (Republican friendly) 2-Climate Change (D) 3-Immigration (R, but deportation/separation focus which is the least friendly to R) 4-Economics (R) 5-Past gaffes (R, only coz Vance has had practice answering for his) 6-Abortion (D) 7-Gun Control (D) 8-Housing (Neutral) 9-Healthcare (slight D) 10-Childcare (D) 11-Democracy (D) 12-Closing Statements (N) Unsurprisingly the liberal media says Walz "found his feet" after a while with such favorable ground, although Vance more than held his own and landed some good hits even then.

[@JRBOFFICIALMUSIC]

6 million views+ with so little comments? I just witnessed thousands of comments deleted. Thanks youtube

[@StevenRotelli]

To many Trump supporters, can’t have the wrong opinion being the popular opinion.

[@MartinReed-u7v]

@@StevenRotelli lol

[@MN_Candy]

Yep, most of my comments are disappearing.

[@pugetsoundfarmer]

Google is the new gatekeeper.

[@jdaddy9318]

@@StevenRotellia wrong opinion?

[@ariesgarcia8638]

Vance is great. He would be a great president.

[@skyacedoes2646]

Such a shame Vance has to wait 5 years to run

[@schnauzerfromohio5618]

@@skyacedoes2646Vance 2028 🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@NSankeerthUrkec]

Wow what a civil style debate finally... These people should run for the presidents

[@michaelmcnulty2859]

Because presidential/vice presidential top qualities are being 'civil'?????? How would that work with uncivil leaders of our enemies? Would you like a polite/civil bodyguard to protect you and your loved ones or one that's fierce and strong?

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Police and Warriors can be brutal when needed but civil gentlemen most of the else times. But some people just bring chaos to the room they "ockupy".

[@hollyharris711]

President and vice president

[@day_uh_um]

@@michaelmcnulty2859 Good point. Like pre-emptive "stuff" (even violence, if necessary), ya know? It's called pre-emptive for a reason. To prevent an aggressor from getting you first. I'm non-partisan, but Trump surprised me with how well he ran the *business* of government, & all the civility has left (no pun intended, but hey) since the totalitarians took our Constitutional rights away & gave enemies of the U.S. so much power. No POTUS has really captured my heart since Ronnie, but I certainly don't want Cackela continuing the B.O. agenda like has been going on since 2021, creating chaos everywhere. I didn't even know what a "tweet" was (just had heard about it a lot) until late 2020, but I'd rather have mean tweets than incompetence any day. Hoping it's not too late for us all.

[@MrMonsterKen]

Vance is a hero, Walz is a violent fraud.

[@chinajazzcat]

Did I just watch a normal debate? I’m impressed. If these were the presidential candidates, I’d feel pretty hopeful.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Trump makes politics fun and scary to see on a movie. But only there.

[@juliebillingsley4441]

Their NOT

[@Bertinator-nm9ld]

We can get back to this, once Trump is finally out of politics. That's what it's going to take

[@llamalinguist3250]

Anyone else think these debate questions were weirdly specific?

[@jonasastrom7422]

@MichaelLochlann Why do you care about proportions? Wealth creation is what made america the world's biggest economy, not wealth distribution. In fact it never had that until the 1900s

[@feelin_fine]

I liked that they were kind of granular and often tough for both sides. I'm tired of candidates coasting on untruths, vibes, and generalities.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Questions was as specific as the audience wanted to hear those answers. Hitler said by Vance for instance.

[@LyricsQuest]

@@feelin_fine It's nice when the specifics are offered, instead of generalities and unsupported assertions.

[@fpalisse]

Unlike the personal debate. Strange

[@ztnep_3670]

Vance calling them out for that so called fact check was hilarious. I expected them to be bad but they exceeded my expectations

[@TechnMoto]

Wish these men were running for president instead of Harris and Trump

[@ChristinaAbouharb]

trump is a good man, unlike what the media is telling you. vote for him, and youll see how our country will change for the better

[@songthan1]

Trump Vance 2024!

[@MN_Candy]

As a Minnesotan, the thought of the man who destroyed our state being in charge of the entire country is terrifying.

[@LuigiGiugno-x6x]

eh trump still better than walz ill agree on vance tho

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Vance could package in Trump's rambling in a croudsized imaginary box in a heartbeat. Vance is much better debater than Orangutan.

[@petepistol7179]

Vance 9 - Waltz 3.5 - Moderators 0

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Trump makes - x points

[@garyt-of6yb]

KAMALA YOUR FIRED GET OUT! SANCTUARY CITIES NO MORE!

[@PaulPhoenixxx]

Sheesh that was intense and civil at the same time, Can we have them run for president instead??

[@nataliiateteruk585]

One of the President running act presidential, the other as a shouting tantrum child played with orange crayons.

[@ip4pwn1]

@@nataliiateteruk585 seriously. You must be unburdened by what has been. 😂 wine & benzo mom is your hero?

[@nataliiateteruk585]

@@PaulPhoenixxx really Rollercoaster of a debate.

[@insoporous9978]

Vance 2028 baybeeeeee! You heard it here first.

[@visiayafeliz4685]

They were so respectful to each other.. WOW!! Future debaters can look to this and learn.

[@donaldclayton9735]

Was quickly apparent that Senator Vance is the smartest of the 4 people on these tickets. The others aren't even close.

[@gyallis4life617]

Wow jd vance can speak 👏

[@ecmomma6025]

I feel like JD Vance was making eye contact and connecting with America. Tim Walz was looking at a camera and speaking. JD Vance is passionate about our country; Trump has already shown his passion for our country during his first 4 years as President. Our country needs change from this last 4 years. Vote Trump-Vance to save our country!

[@thegroovypatriot]

Finally someone brought up CENSORSHIP, the most important issue, because without it theres no real discussion about anything else. And walz avoided it. Yelling fire in a theater? Come on. We're way past that now.

[@Janseria]

Yeah, when I heard that I cringed. It was a shot in the dark. Because what he actually really said was that there was no first amendment protection for misinformation. And we’re all very aware of how much “misinformation” got censored online that turned out to be true.

[@ariadne538]

@@Janseria Okay then give us an example for that

[@Janseria]

@@ariadne538 I’m glad you asked. Allow me to defend that remark. Sorry for being so verbose, but this is important. I’ll give you a link below to a full interview on MSNBC with Walz. You can watch the entire interview if you like, because I want you to know I’m not trying to hide anything, but I will tie two points together here because there is much in between them that can make it seem that one has nothing to do with the other. And they are inextricable. This part is important because it ties in and is part of his “misinformation” remarks. About the 1:45 mark he complains of “misinformation” surrounding Covid, Jan 6th, etc. I’m just going to address Covid here, because this would be even longer otherwise. While he doesn’t say what that misinformation was in regard to Covid, we do know many, many people were banned or censored at multiple social media sites AT THE BEHEST OF GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES for suggesting that Covid was accidentally released from a Wuhan lab, they were banned or censored for suggesting the death counts were inaccurate, they were banned or censored for suggesting ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine may be helpful, there were many other reasons for getting banned or censored. By the time this interview aired, there was vindication for many of who were banned or censored and much of that information was correct. He doesn’t confirm or deny that vindication. (They also censored info about Hunter’s laptop) At about the 3:30min mark he’s asked about misinformation about voting. Like, someone telling people the wrong day for the election. He takes it a step further and states that is now a “massive” problem and calls it actual “intimidation” at the ballot box. Then at the 4:00min mark is when he says there is no free speech guarantee for misinformation or hate speech. He declines to say whether there should be punishment, as was asked. Everyone’s question is, “Who gets to determine what is ‘misinformation’ or ‘hate speech’?” Especially considering the massive banning and censorship that occurred during Covid being pushed by government. kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2nRpGpsh6igjdU

[@honorsixx6383]

SARS-Cov2 from the Wuhan Lab in China -Dangers of DARPA financed mRNA gene therapy injections/bioweapon -First Amendment violations of DNC-supporting Big Tech and threats from FBI, CIA, DHS, etc al. -Suppression/lies about Hunter Biden laptops and Russia-Russia Hillary Clinton election interference? That's just the tip of the globalist DNC iceberg. Where do you want to start, darlin'?

[@gcwallace1341]

@@ariadne538 What about Project 2025. The only people that I ever hear talking about it are the democrats. They are beating that thing to death. To me it sounds like a concerted effort by democrats to fear monger people. ie; misinformation. No one has ever actually read it. Republicans pretty much ignore it. "Accuse your enemy of what YOU are doing, as you are doing it to create confusion" famous quote suggesting that maybe Project 2025 is the democrats agenda.

[@TheCrystallineAnunna]

In the 70s-80s, we had guns on gun racks on our trucks...at school. No mass school shootings with us. Why?

[@CBEACHMEDIA]

What has changed? A common culture.

[@TheCrystallineAnunna]

​@@CBEACHMEDIA 100%.✌️

[@777denny1]

Democrats pass laws that restrict lawful gun ownership in the big cities, then let the criminals out to commit more gun crimes. 90% of Gun Crimes committed by Criminals with illegal guns.

[@aqualinebutbetter]

Culture in general, and maybe more access to bad people that influence others.

[@TheSUPERWIND2023]

​@@CBEACHMEDIACulture.

[@kyleduquette6361]

JD explaining how illegal immigrants are gaining temporary asylum status and circumventing legal immigration was beautiful. Chefs kiss, I wish we could put him into office

[@BehindTheEight]

It's when they cut the mic you know we're not allowed to hear it

[@nataliiateteruk585]

FOX would do the debate better. But they have to unlock the comment sections.

[@noaheverett103]

That's what the media does. That's another example of censorship. And like how Trump was nearly killed last July because they know he's gonna expose the criminals in the house.

[@ariadne538]

No it‘s when they cut the mic when you know they‘ve overstepped their time and/or say falsehoods. Y‘all have freedom of speech, you can read and/or hear what you want to hear, stop feeling persecuted when you’re really not. This had nothing to do with “what we‘re not allowed to hear“

[@DinoTaken]

@@nataliiateteruk585 buddy they don't want to because they don't want infiltration in other viewpoints lol.

[@MT-nw3qh]

JD Vance just saved the Trump election campaign!!!!

[@MN_Candy]

It was never in danger

[@day_uh_um]

@@MN_Candy As long as election fraud is possible & even made to be easier to commit than ever before, there will always be a danger. To us all.

[@avimah5019]

​@@MN_Candy but it make Trump looking even more better in his selection of Vance.

[@soreal091987]

Seems like they fact checked the wrong person 👊👏💪 Got her!!

[@flexmebaby]

No wonder CBS doesn’t get any views. 🙄

[@rhondawi6389]

You’re right they’re gonna get less because of what Margaret did to Vance. Try to fact, check him and throw in her own opinion.

[@blondelp8451]

4M+ views in a day!

[@blondelp8451]

@@rhondawi6389 Actually she did a fantastic job! I started to subscribe this channel today.

[@magdalenachwaja9516]

No, she did not do a good Job. Moderator should be neutral . End od story .

[@Sayan-n5h]

At least they respect each other.

[@aj9818]

This is debate I expected

[@theauthenticthrift]

JD forced Walz to discuss actual policy and I'm not sure he came prepared for that. He prepared for Donald Trump but got this wiz kid! Great job!

[@exismys]

Holy hell my standards has gone so down I am just shocked how civil this whole debate is. wow!

[@haveneliason1006]

As a Minnesotan College student, I do not know a single person who has said their rent has gone down. I have no idea where this rent reduction is being recorded, however I can say the people here are not feeling it. I have been watching the renting market in Minneapolis for the last 3 years trying to find reasonable housing rates and all of it is attrociously priced, and prices have shot up astronomically in recent years.

[@DinoTaken]

Inflation has gone down...

[@toggle2565]

@@DinoTaken maybe in your delusional world but for everyone else it has not

[@DinoTaken]

@@toggle2565 First of all, please don't call me delusional. Most phycologists actually argue that anger is a factor from lying and nervousness. Secondly, if you ever did your research, you would know it has gone down tremendously. www.bls.gov/charts/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-index-by-category-line-chart.htm And the source is trustworthy. :) Third, it only rised because of the American Care Act that saved millions of lives. Thank you :)

[@DinoTaken]

@@toggle2565 www.bls.gov/charts/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-index-by-category-line-chart.htm check your sources :)

[@DinoTaken]

@@toggle2565 search it up. federal funds in relation to inflation is dropping, so consumers have lower prices. cpi is also decreasing.

[@ToastyDoasty]

I would honestly be so much happier if these two ran instead of Trump and Harris

[@3BK235Y]

The definitive and final sprint towards Donald Trump's victory started here.

[@loraclear1327]

Wow! This debate was amazing. I enjoyed hearing both candidates perspectives. The recap of the debate from CBS was ridiculous. Basically bashing Vance for everything he said. The media is unbelievable today.

[@uknighted213]

JD Vance for president.

[@mysunnybird]

Much, much better than trump.

[@louisdonley2060]

Both women asking questions need to be fired. So one-side. Fake.

[@Dani4True]

Smart man Vance vs Con man Walz.

[@inconsistentinternetvideos]

The civility in this is actually enjoyable to witness

[@sarahkoefod7318]

Imagine if we had a republican & democrat as running mates for president & vp… these two seem like they could have productive conversations for both parties & create solutions for all Americans.

[@MN_Candy]

No. I'm in MN and this Walz isn't the real him. The real Walz is the guy who just flipped the bird at the fans at the mi game he just attended. He's nasty with a bad temper. He's so disliked here, he can't even attend most events here. He has lowered our quality of life SO MUCH and insults voters on such a regular basis... Ick

[@nataliiateteruk585]

​@candypodratz no, that is not true. Tim is called COACH for a reason.

[@day_uh_um]

@@nataliiateteruk585 Are you sure it isn't ROACH?

[@joyfulhomemaker8053]

I strongly urge you to better understand the core values of each party. If you understand that, as well as the purpose of the president and the purpose of the VP, you would know that would not work

[@joyfulhomemaker8053]

@@nataliiateteruk585 Cuz he was a co-coach. I’ve known bad coaches and good coaches. Even the good coaches weren’t good at EVERYTHING else in existence.

[@marandawebb8207]

Thank you for explaining the legal process❤ 😂😂😂

[@raidtheferry]

It's not _just the guns._ 95%+ of those kids who ended themselves with firearms would've found another way if the firearm wasn't available so that's not telling much.

[@moon-and-star]

Joe Biden: I am forgotten

[@ivanbukac4618]

Funny how they just pushed him on the side.

[@Charlotte-zj8rq]

Who?

[@Bertinator-nm9ld]

Why would a non-candidate be relevant to a presidential debate?

[@Anon__User]

@@Bertinator-nm9ld He's the sitting president, and one candidate is his current vice president.

[@Bertinator-nm9ld]

@@Anon__User Ok, and? Why does that make him relevant for the debate? As a comparison, in years where the outgoing president has already served two terms, and is leaving office because of that, do they usually come up much in the presidential debates?

[@bethells86]

Answering questions that sounds good and nice is one thing, what actual policy they bring to the table is what needs to be looked into.

[@russellgolden7546]

True. It’s not like we have 7 1/2 years of history to compare.

[@Sandyshopping-jr6bu]

Watching from Australia 🇦🇺. These two should be running for the position of President.

[@nataliiateteruk585]

Trump should stand down.

[@Susan-r6x5n]

WALZ needs to go "bye bye"

[@mikaalaiearley6217]

You shouldn't speak on that.

[@Jenniferkraus-sz3nq]

Vance did a very god job. On this one he impressed me.

[@darkness3001]

Democrats have lost my vote

[@diegogalvan1810]

I wish these two were the presidential candidates, I was blown away by how civil and cordial they were