We Just Saw a Star Drag The Fabric of The Universe - Einstein Was Right Again!

[@whatdamath]

Having read the comments I really think Flame Dragon is a much better name for this phenomenon

[@deusexaethera]

Fun fact: East Asian people would still pronounce it "Frame Dragon". 😁

[@HeadsetHatGuy]

@@deusexaethera yeah Japanese people have difficulties pronouncing 'R' and 'L'

[@deusexaethera]

@@HeadsetHatGuy: Yes, that is the stereotype that I based my joke on. I wish I could explain to them how to pronounce the letter L, because it's actually quite easy. Make an "uh" sound while pressing the tip of your tongue against the backs of your upper front teeth. I actually have explained this to a couple people from Taiwan and Japan who were struggling to pronounce my last name, and I was pleased when they weren't offended by my help.

[@HeadsetHatGuy]

@@deusexaethera That's nice of you

[@jayknight139]

This looks alot like the laminar flow reversibility experiment.

[@MrSkinnyWhale]

Einstein still flexing

[@russiandevil14]

MrSkinnyWhale slam dunks from beyond the grave over and over again bruh

[@dsm5d723]

@@russiandevil14 The Nike Anti-Air Alberts are no joke. 5 point harness in a shoe.

[@K3NB0T]

@@dsm5d723 Bro word around the scientific world is they brought him down wearing some legendary pair of Theory 15s. Custom built 💀

[@dsm5d723]

@@K3NB0T Too yeezy for me, to poop on! (Triumphant?) Tell Maldacena his shoes need a $#!T shine, boy. (the boy is for Juan, not you)

[@AnDrEw122100]

Hahaha

[@regular-joe]

It's a huge compliment to us that you always include a link to the original research, it tells us that you trust our intelligence and also that you expect to be checked up on by skeptics. Thanks, Anton!

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

Only after listening to Anton I have the nerve to go read the original paper. Otherwise I wouldn't understand anything.

[@mutemain8610]

Anton is real news :)

[@jzblue345]

Some of these objects that exist are Extremely terrifying anything that gets near these things would be absolutely destroyed and assimilated into the systems like a borg.

[@buddyywilsonn]

Yes

[@ronniemadeit]

This is hilarious. Along with the rest of this guy's content on outer space. No disrespect to this channel but any research coupled with critical thinking puts this ridiculousness right where it belongs. In the trash

[@lasarith2]

I know he’s saying Frame dragging - but all I hear is Flame Dragon.

[@jengleheimerschmitt7941]

Flame Dragon

[@KajanLakhan]

Frame Dragon 🐉....that's what brought me here..

[@xxCrimsonSpiritxx]

It doesss lol

[@PatThePerson]

It sounds like a speedrun strat.

[@thezoverload]

I was literally about to post the same thing lol

[@user-on4nx2ho7b]

It’s actually insane that we can write down exactly how things work in the Universe on a piece of Paper & how accurate it turns out to be.

[@yb6.]

Yea Y’all don’t know nothing till y’all go out there and see it all in real life

[@voidremoved]

@@yb6. real life is a lie. You will return to dust awaiting a day that you will rise and be judged and erased

[@lexmortis5722]

voidremoved And who dares to judge? And who judges the judge, if even only just 1 is being judged, all have to be judged by everyone, no exceptions. Anything else wouldn’t be fair or perfect.

[@khanwayne8281]

😂 😂 lol😂😂

[@coltm4a186]

voidremoved How is real life a lie? If you want to discuss salvation, this isn’t the channel to do it. You shouldn’t be censored, but you should probably know what channels you’re watching before you post.

[@adymode]

Frame dragging was deliberated in antiquity by a thought experiment : If the only thing present in the whole universe was a single spinning bucket of water, would the water push up the sides of the bucket ? Frame dragging theory and data predicts that it wouldn't push up the sides - the bucket and water would kind of forget that it was spinning because it has no other references. The further away from other massive bodies some other massive body is, the less it feels like it spins and faster things must travel in order to orbit it in the same direction, because the space itself is spun by the mass. Its pretty out there.

[@phxcppdvlazi]

That blows my mind

[@comozo924]

This raises an interesting question. What is space? I heard Brian Green say if you were the only spinning object in the universe you would know you were spinning.

[@emrvld1420]

]

[@bustedrav]

@@comozo924 space is a very diffuse gas

[@comozo924]

@@bustedrav take away all the gas (matter), all of the photons..., all of the quantum fields and what remains is space.

[@Fonzi727]

I can’t unhear “frame dragon”

[@howardstrauss5166]

Flame dragon... that is what I hear.

[@DavidVonR]

That'd be pretty cool. To have a nice picture of a dragon with a nice frame around it.

[@alinakki]

@@DavidVonR i really like nice dragons with nice little frames around them

[@siyacer]

@@alinakki A nice frame of a nice dragon wearing nice frames

[@Aristocles22]

Sounds like something you need to kill in Stellaris to get to the black hole which gives a huge bonus to physics research.

[@alanoffer]

And Einstein didn’t need computer models to give him answers . Amazing man

[@xxCrimsonSpiritxx]

@Planet Purgatory y u mad

[@MaryAnnNytowl]

@ritemoelaw_books83 you mean might have. He basically just noticed that things fall, and decided to write it down. 😉

[@randyrick8019]

Einstein just created more questions

[@fineartpottamus9020]

@Chetan stfu he is among the greats not the greatest

[@SymphonicHarmony]

He needed Nikola Tesla tho to come to his conclusion...

[@Darkwizzrobe]

I think it's awesome that we are getting so much news of space as of late.

[@Rivenburg-xd5yf]

@@nish8435 internet: human neural accelerator. Gestalt constructor.

[@MaryAnnNytowl]

@@Rivenburg-xd5yf oh, how I wish you were right about the internet, but you obviously haven't been around the internet very much. Even *these* comment sections on KZbin can make one wonder how we managed to crawl out of the trees and start building things, to begin with.

[@Rivenburg-xd5yf]

@@MaryAnnNytowl yeah, the internet gives voice to those who should gtf back in the closet. The 4% on either end of the bell curve. The sadistic are out in massive numbers right now bashing Jordan Peterson is his illness. That said, it also allows the positive exchange of ideas and concepts. a easy example are all the repair vids on YT. guys have to fix things they've never opened up before LOVE it. you can find some one to show you how to do anything. its a net positive, no pun intended.

[@DoctorShaunB]

@@Rivenburg-xd5yf I beg to differ, I think that pun was intended...and it was appreciated :) but seriously I totally agree on the overall positive effects of the internet (if you know how to avoid the toxic side of the web). I'm essentially rebuilding my boat dock and replacing the high pressure tube for my wife's power steering thanks to some past experience, YT repair videos, and the collective USEFUL CONSTRUCTIVE comments from experienced well meaning individuals. I've built a hardline water cooled PC, rebuilt an entire bathroom from the studs on up, replaced brakes, made a firepit/patio, the list goes on, thanks to the internet. Like I said, I'm rebuilding my boat dock, my use of the word 'constructive' was a pun intended haha

[@neilcosentino3548]

DarkWizard and ur an idiot

[@ahrimanic7]

I love how modern cosmology becomes increasingly inarticulate as it discovers that it understands less and less about more and more.

[@Rivenburg-xd5yf]

humans are barely intelligent enough to peer around and get a clue. only a tiny fraction of us can function with cosmological theory. I feel like the dog.

[@anarex0929]

We are but children sir. We think we know everything in the beginning but as we age we realize how little we know, and how much further still there is to go... And it puts a smile on my face.

[@mitaskeledzija6269]

We are still learning lol

[@phildurre9492]

what? the video is about confirming a 100year old prediction. Not about some doubts of any kind...

[@mitaskeledzija6269]

@@phildurre9492 true

[@rodbell7906]

Usually just a lurker, "one who watches is wise" is my family's motto soo, I dont comment often. I gotta say it though, mad respect for not being another 'all hail Einstein and his predictions' kind of guy. Giving credit to the other 2 brilliant minds that helped formulate these theorys? Respect man. Respect.

[@MaryAnnNytowl]

@Planet Purgatory well, no, he didn't know the names of the other scientists. But he IS here, and he IS learning, which are both good things. So, maybe cut down the killer sarcasm just a tiny bit, eh?

[@garyoldham4449]

Just keep commenting dude, it builds character. Some low grade attacks you 1. ignore them or 2. step on their damn throat! It's all good! And welcome to wonderful world of wonderful persons (some of them make me wonder)!

[@RWMAirgunsmithing]

Except it is one of general relativity's predictions... You are basically saying they would have came up with all this on the same timescale without Einstein and general relativity when in reality the reason they were trying to figure it out and looking for data is because of the predictions made by general relativity. It's like saying; the only reason person A built a wheel is because person B built a car, therefore person B should get credit for the wheel.

[@rhoddryice5412]

So eventually the claws of the frame dragon will rip space-time apart.

[@mladen7641]

This is known as the Big Rip, or as the Druids called it, Bigdragonswooshswooshapocaliptusend.

[@TheChugg11]

Genuinely misread the title for a second and read it as: ‘Epstein was right!’ and was reconsidering my sub to this channel. Am reconsidering going to an optician though!

[@HaloForgeUltra]

*What's with your username?*

[@fakeandgay9592]

Better question what’s with your eyesight?

[@etherealstars5766]

@@HaloForgeUltra Jedi mind tricks

[@TheChugg11]

EtherealStars Indeed!

[@Wilverine99]

Einstein didn’t kill himself! 🤣

[@RadicalCaveman]

The universe is a drag, man!

[@guikoi3101]

Everything's a drag...

[@felipeoyarzun5424]

Thank god it's not a Drag Queen

[@justsomekidwithwhitehair7415]

Shikamaru? Is that you?

[@turgidbanana]

Star: "don't mind me, I'm just draggin'..." Earthlings: "what are you draggin?" Star: "DEEZ FRAMES! HA! GOT EEM!"

[@prod_vello]

🤣

[@ThePitbull357]

😆

[@jengleheimerschmitt7941]

Excellent.

[@blistersonmyfingers9321]

You won the interwebz today, m8.

[@mfelliott87]

Haha clever

[@Halffullofjuice]

"a multidimensional gyroscope" - humans are awesome.

[@SpecialEDy]

"20km, the size of a large city" Me laughing in Texan

[@WolfMountford]

Yee Haw!

[@garyballard179]

Irish woman mentioned lockdown rules of 20km travel restrictions in Ireland, and I realized that under those rules, you could barely cross my Texas hometown, and you wouldn't be able to cross most Texas cities at all...

[@grilledleeks6514]

@@garyballard179 oh.

[@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVax]

"What's so great about dumb ole Texas?"

[@garyballard179]

@@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVax Everything

[@SilverM1y]

What Da Math - better than PBS any day of the week!

[@tarnishedpose]

I just finished watching a video about how the guys behind Interestellar's Black Hole design came up with the concept of the black hole and what it would do to the space around it... and now this video pops up lol And even stranger, at 1:15 I was like "that sounds like what the black hole in Interestellar was doing..." And few seconds later you actually mentioned it

[@maxnullifidian]

Curiouser and curiouser...

[@chrislaezur730]

Well, that is how the algorithm is designed to work Keep you on KZbin as long as possible

[@john_smithchiropractor3931]

You've precessed time and now you know.

[@LTzEz03z]

Baader-Meinhof?

[@donaldsmith3926]

I don't know if it was the same video, but I've seen the science adviser for "Interstellar" say the speed of light was the only thing he told them was not for debate; he was willing to listen to ideas about anything else.

[@RamonddeVrede]

Thanks Anton for educating and entertaining us !

[@ericanightshade]

Historical Summary: "Einstein was right again!" Lense and Thirring: "Are we a joke to you?"

[@ETALAL]

Yeah and that's the last time I waste on this infants channel, There's a lot he can't understand because its wrong This be will go the way of leeched in medicine Anyhoo after the global warming bid, this dude is a parrot How does he get so many subs? Oh yeah ytbe rewards BS

[@CrisReed2]

@@ETALAL Are you ok m8? It seems that you're having a stroke. This man did credit Lense and Thirring.

[@vitaurea]

@@ETALAL go to school and fix your grammar

[@Interfect727]

@@ETALAL "This be will go the way of leeched in medicine." Who needs to fix their grammar??

[@gregi787]

@@ETALAL ooooo holy, almighty all knowing AL gayder. please, enlighten us with your infinite knowledge of the Cosmo 🙇

[@michaelblacktree]

Since the pulsar is more massive (and denser) than the white dwarf, wouldn't its frame-dragging effect be even stronger? Is there a way to measure that effect on the white dwarf?

[@olympicging1155]

I have a feeling I might know the answer to this, but I just feel like asking anyway; would this mean that if something was spinning fast enough, it could become a black hole even if it doesn't really have the mass to become one?

[@Rivenburg-xd5yf]

only if cohesive enough to overcome centrifugal effects. An exercise in statics. but yes, apparently, in that limited context.

[@scottperry7311]

I'm just speculating here. When matter speeds up it begins to demonstrate some of the same characteristics of a high mass object. The faster an object goes the more energy it needs exponentially to hit the speed of light, its as if its mass was increasing as it moved faster. The faster an object moves the more time slows for that object in relation to the universe around it, much the same as the more mass that accumulated in a body, a black hole being the ultimate example, the more time slows for that body in relation to the Universe around it. Satellites internal clocks go out of sink with clocks on earth because of the speed they travel, and because of the distance they are from the earths gravitational field. Why is the speed of light the speed limit in the Universe, is it because moving at the speed of light bring you near the state of a singularity (Im guessing here), though light photos are very very very low mass, and don't have much effect as a singularity. So What does a spinning mass do, its mass is moving at a very high rate and begin to manifest the effects of that speed in time dilation. The only thing that is keeping it from becoming a black hole is that its moving too fast and its stretching gravity along through space, not manifesting it in a single point in time and space as in a black hole. So as it stretches it through space it pull space around it. The faster the spin and the more the mass the more the effect and the more the stretching. Interestingly if that speed was to stop the manifestation of it would as well and you would be left with only the base effects of mass. Think about the fact that super massive Stars become black holes when they collapse. Why don't they just become black holes to begin with when all that mass comes together in the first place. Because there is pent up energy in that mass that keeps it from becoming so compact to manifest all the gravity of all that mass in a very very small point, where it could become a singularity. But imagine that the Universe is a web of gravity, high speed would compress mass/gravity on its self at the tip of the movement, and stretch out gravity behind it, ie. Frame Dragging.

[@Rivenburg-xd5yf]

@@giljamesbavel2137 typing on my phone, can hardly see the freaking screen after a while. thx.

[@PHeMoX]

@@scottperry7311 According to Einstein that shouldn't be possible, as it would require literal insane amounts of energy to get up to those kinds of speeds. That type of energy wouldn't just magically exist. "Why is the speed of light the speed limit in the Universe, is it because moving at the speed of light bring you near the state of a singularity (Im guessing here), though light photos are very very very low mass, and don't have much effect as a singularity." Then again, I believe the speed of light is only a limit in an observable sense. There's nothing in a physical sense that limits speed. The idea that the mass of fuel and the engines required to go light speeds or faster has to be infinitely larger is flawed. We've had plenty of examples of mass and energy versus speed being a rather optimal ratio in planes that already exist. The idea that something becomes heavier in terms of mass also only applies to when gravity exists that has an insane pull on the spacecraft. And we see rockets break from earth's gravity all the time. Except for super massive blackholes we should be avoiding anyway, what exactly would have the strength to capture these faster than light speed spacecraft? The difficulty with going faster than light, means as an observer you wouldn't see it. Or maybe see it extremely briefly with a huge delay, like a light flash. Think of it as the speed of sound. But instead of a sound that's way late, you'd see a brief light flash. The speed of sound never turned out to be a physical speed limit either, despite the 'weird' effect of things moving faster than the sound it makes. I'm 100% confident the speed of light is no different. The issue is more, how the hell would you navigate through anything and avoid objects at those speeds? And of course, what type of propulsion system could get us close to those kinds of speeds? I don't think those have been invented yet.

[@scottperry7311]

@@PHeMoX You are correct it would take insane amounts of energy to get anything with substantial mass to the speed of light. But maybe the governor on velocity is the speed of light for that very reason. Any mater or energy would hit that wall at a certain velocity because gravity compresses and acts like mass at speed. Just like sonic compression for super sonic flight. The effects of this compression depend on speed and initial mass, most objects would experience very little effect at relatively low speed, a ship leaving the earth would be traveling at a relativelly very slow speed even at 10,000 miles an hour. Now a plane that is approching the speed of light and displaying this effect would not fall out of the sky because of its speed. Nor would its increased mass do to the compression affect its surroundings, again its just to fast for it to manifest thise effects on one point in space and time which would be necessary for it to fall out of the sky or pull the planet to it. Once the speed is gone so is the simulated mass that prevents faster travel. It may be that their are smaller particals that we callot detect with our level of science now that move even faster than the speed of light. Light being governed by the same limites on speed and mass as every other thing in the universe, but its starting mass, photos limit its speed. Yes navigation would be very difficult at faster than light speeds. You would aim for target, jump and then see hpw close you got. The you would have to the travel more conventional speeds to your destination. Kinda the golf ball approch to navigation, one big swing and then little putts.

[@cezariusus7595]

Your videos are the first thing I see in the morning, unironically it's the first video i click on when waking up for school.

[@johnabbot1585]

I love you shows, but at times I get lost. I must be simple...😁👍 thank you wonderful person.

[@whatwouldpicarddomakeitso9607]

Mr Petrov ,I have to tell you how much I appreciate you making these videos for us, I don’t have your intelligence or your memory to remember everything you seem to recall with such ease , but I tell you I’m so grateful that you have that and you are willing to share with us. I have always been interested in space and dipped in books etc but I could never relay it so well to others ,where as you are a natural and the fact you take time to teach us who want to be taught is such a wonderful selfless thing to do and I truly want you to know it’s an honour to learn from you and much appreciated . You are the WONDERFUL PERSON. 💛✨ thank you.💋

[@stevencameron3154]

Ahhh frame dragging, I thought you said flame dragon lol thinking einstein is a baddass Elon musk has those cool af names lol Another wonderful video my brother. I mentioned your name on a recent video of pretty old news and I think I got a bunch of new subscribers for you lol. Keep loving brother.

[@lasagnajohn]

i got a taste of getting rich, superior, influential maybe enough to taste what the billionaires be thinkin, will try to observe more closer loloolol. definitely you get as sense of hostility, find out you can't communicate with people, then you get paranoid rightfully, you wanna get all the same needs met as everybody else but now you got a new set of enemies, that you earned through no fault of your own, parents, brain, charisma, etc. Definitely other billionaire is as far away as Astra Zenica, so you reach out to old pre-lottery connections if you lucky enough to have any. then you try and lean on acquaintances, same as psychopaths do. After a while you get used to being alone and become misanthropic hermaphrodite.

[@shaheenaevelga8604]

@@lasagnajohn Maybe lay of the weird-juice, Mate.

[@saltyark7564]

Not sure if you know what hermaphrodite means 🤔

[@stevencameron3154]

@@lasagnajohn totally, why iv beaten the punch. But I think your missing the optimism. I live for my family i live for them. Long run though (I die life continues) is we need to figure it out man. Does a fire go out because you want it to. No. So I think the minority of better brains (not clowns shoes as per used) will win overall because we care. Not to win but to continue fighting. And the people we fight for will pass on with a smile. That's all it's supposed to be. Instead of this die shit

[@hudsonlawrence]

haha I thought so too lol! so much to learn!

[@donkeedic3436]

I just had a thought. If traveling thru space at faster and faster speeds causes time dilation, since we as a planet, solar system, galaxy, etc... are moving thru space, what would happen if we quit moving in space all together? I know space is expanding, but how would not moving at all affect our perception of time

[@red-eyedblackbird8048]

Thank you Anton, you are like a endless spring of so wanted knowledge about universe!

[@luc-i-guess]

Anton is the only way I get any learning done during depressive episodes

[@slappy8941]

One way to deal with depression is to engage in a task that requires concentration. I like to study languages using a variety of apps that give instant feedback, so that I can feel a sense of accomplishment. It really helps.

[@phxcppdvlazi]

@@slappy8941 what helps me is engaging in difficult work or project I can completely lose myself in. Don't worry, we're alone, but we're alone together

[@jonaszprzybycien6545]

Anton:Frame dragging Subtitles:Frame dragon xD

[@davep8221]

I can't place your accent, but wherever it's from, they *are* sending us their best people. Thanks.

[@thatguyron7776]

Russian or Ukrainian.

[@bowiefaniamiam8118]

Sometimes Anton, your information just goes ''Whoosh'' straight over my head!

[@johnmccormick49]

I know the feeling! I was actually told to watch this channel to get a better idea of how to explain complicated information in a way that it is easy to understand and people wont wanna fall asleep. I teach college degree level culinary arts and i was having a hard time reaching the students. My boss was right though, Anton has a way of communicating massively complex info in a relatively easy, short burst way without sounding condescending or boared. Not easy let me tell you. Now i watch just to learn about the cosmos.

[@vladsnape6408]

Good to see that the Parkes radio telescope (in NSW Australia) is still being used for cutting-edge research. For anyone interested, a movie was made about it called "The Dish".

[@garypugh1153]

I believe you are a genius 🇺🇸 amazing computer graphics. Makes it easy to comprehend space.

[@reinerwilhelms-tricarico344]

Does frame dragging require that the dragged space is filled with mass - at least ever so slightly? In other words, if a massive rotating object is surrounded by completely empty space (no mass, no gases), can that empty space be frame dragged? I guess this is a question more about the mathematical theory of frame dragging, because there is no such thing as completely empty space. Suppose there is only light in that surrounding space. As far as I know, the aberration of light, i.e., change of the direction of traveling light waves, is usually explained by the change of the metric of spacetime due to the massive object, and doesn't take rotation of the massive object into account. What is different for a rapidly rotating mass?

[@tommywiseauconfit]

"It's not possible" "No it's neccessary"

[@colepenick5238]

My guy. You are truly doing God’s work. I can’t believe I’m saying this: based on this video you now have more informative and attractive content than PBS-ST or Fermilab. Fantastic visuals, graphs, description, i mean I could go on. Well done, sir.

[@tato-chip7612]

even after death those stars are still together. Says a lot about friendship

[@michaelmccain9560]

So glad I refound your channel. Love learning about all space stuff. Just unfathomable.

[@marknelson4856]

I'm glad you understand this stuff cuz my brain Hurts now 🤣🤣 I love this kind of stuff! Been fascinated with it ever since I can remember. thank you for making videos like this because not many people do! And the other people that do make videos like this don't speak in a manner that everyone can understand. Thank you sir👍

[@Skiptondesigns]

1:34 What movie? Didn't quite understand what you said there Anton.

[@Hellgrinde]

Oh yeah, i heard flame dragons and white dwarves, I read too much fantasy lol Love your channel my friend!

[@piranhaplantX]

I mean, the latter is actually a thing. But yeah, the flame dragon had me chuckling a bit.

[@JonnyGuns]

Great video! What software are you using for the visual examples?

[@howardstrauss5166]

Lovely man. Lovely smile. Great studies. Many thanx.

[@thehelpsmith]

Frame dragging has been on my mind for a long time as the simple solution to the pinwheel motion of galaxies, universal expansion, (dark matter and dark energy), universal filaments, black hole jets, and so on. In the case of universal expansion, I can imagine space being pushed apart as the frame dragging effects create peaks and troughs in space that collide with others. Great video, thank you!

[@inglestaemtudo]

Man .... i love this channel.... it's amazing!!!!

[@wayne.edward.clarke]

An object spinning in space causes rotational frame-dragging, an object moving through space in a straight line causes linear frame dragging. An object moving at high percentages of the speed of light feels slightly less of the effects of the relativistic speeds it's traveling at than it would without frame-dragging because it is dragging some of the space around it along with it. Learning how to increase this effect by artificial means might allow faster than light travel, (if we had an anti-matter-drive or a Bussard ramjet) since the ship wouldn't be traveling faster than the speed of light inside the pocket of space/time that it's dragging along around it. Maybe we could blast a hellacious gamma laser out the front of the ship to get the space/time moving in the right direction before the ship gets there.

[@thedoruk6324]

'' *tHe wOrM loVEs uS aLL!* '' - Stellaris psalm 00

[@lasagnajohn]

I can't beat that game, habit i started in Civ4. DL 1st ep of picard, he say dont want game to end.

[@LecherousLizard]

@@lasagnajohn To be honest Stellaris is unbeatable with how garbage the optimization is in this game. Without the Stellaris Immortal conversion even top tier PCs choke after 2-3 hours on anything but the smallest maps (which you can't play on without mods to begin with).

[@Alkezo1]

@@LecherousLizard Weird. I've clocked about 1k hours so far and its not nearly as bad as you claim. My CPU isn't even that great, an older i7.

[@LecherousLizard]

@@Alkezo1 Yeah, and I have 8700k and after about 300 years on the "default" setting advancing a single day on highest speed takes 15 seconds. Yes, I heard some people are blessed with magical hardware configurations that experience no slowdowns whatsoever, but an exception doesn't disprove the rule.

[@Alkezo1]

@@LecherousLizard And the same is true on the opposite end of the spectrum. It seems you're having particular issues that I have never heard from anyone else. I have a lot of friends that play Stellaris with varying degrees of computer rigs and they aren't even close to that claim of 15 seconds per day, 300 years into the game. I'd appreciate some honesty.

[@MechMan0124]

Another great video, thank you Mr. Petrov! These can be a little frustrating to watch for me though, given the current stuck-in-the-mud state of astrophysics. Gravity waves, time dilation, an imaged black hole, and now frame dragging? How many spacetime-related observations must they be surprised by until astrophysicists finally start viewing space as a material. Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington famously called it back in 1926, ironically in his argument against the formation/existence of black holes (Which both he and Einstein firmly believed were impossible. We know better now ofc). "Thirdly, the mass would produce so much curvature of the space-time metric that space would close up round the star". You were correct Sir Eddington, it most certainly does, and the repercussions of that overlooked mechanic have left astrophysicists stumbling in the dark and scrambling to fill the gaps in their equations for nearly a century now. We have lots of observational data and it all points to one simple fact; space flows slowly from all directions down toward and into supermassive black holes. Space was created in the big bang, naturally it can be destroyed. It is evident that this process occurs when spacetime is condensed back into matter in supermassive black holes. That's why we observe orbital velocities higher than predicted in galaxies with supermassive black holes at their cores (Yeah, the squints flubbed in extra gravity in silly places to make their incomplete equations work and called it 'dark matter'). That's why we've now observed galaxies with no apparent 'dark matter'; they lack a supermassive black hole at their center and so they experience no frame drift effect. That's why galactic clusters can remain cohesive outside the range of their combined gravity; their black holes put the space between them in tension and tug at each other over vast distances. That's why light traversing intergalactic space stretches and red-shifts (and caused the mistaken belief that it was doppler effect, which lead to this 'dark energy', accelerating expansion nonsense). That's also why the "Hubble Constant" has been demoted to the "Hubble Function"; the tensile pressure light waves experience varies depending on the population of black holes in the different regions they traverse. That's the solution to the parsec problem and why we detect black hole mergers so often; the space between close orbiting black holes is slowly consumed. That's how matter was so thoroughly and quickly concentrated in the early universe; first-generation stars collapsed into black holes which formed galactic cores that could pull in gasses at distances greater than their gravity alone would allow. That's what caused the big bang; the final ultra-massive black hole in the previous universe consumed its available spacetime and lost its containing gravity, releasing its contents in the form of space and energy for the whole thing to start all over again. Roger Penrose and his team are correct, those are the marks of smaller black hole snacks from the previous universe, imaged in the cosmic background radiation. Are you an astrophysicist? Want to put a simple old hard-working math nerd in my place? Find me a supermassive black hole at the core of one of these dark-matter devoid galaxies.. Or devise an experiment that can disprove the notion that frame drift is occurring.. Or find a more elegant mechanism that solves all these mysteries simultaneously without requiring some silly new force, exotic undetectable matter, or some magical spontaneous perpetual-motion energy. I dare you.

[@t.w.3]

Nice comment. I read about the "Big rip" theory which in layman's terms is when the space-time is being consumed so fast the universe is being ripped apart. It makes sense when you look at this phenomena. I'm looking forward to hearing more about this pulsar and the new theories they propose for it.

[@UtraVioletDreams]

Cool! More arguments to convince doubters......

[@coltm4a186]

Is it bad that I thought pulsars were much larger? I know they’re powerful, but didn’t think they’d be that small. Don’t crucify me for asking! I’m here to learn!!

[@AssistantCoreAQI]

@@coltm4a186 It's Not Bad At All! It's Kinda Hard To Believe That Pulsars Are So Small Yet So Massive, But, That's Just The Nature Of Neutron Degenerate Matter!

[@dannydd5910]

@@coltm4a186 Nah, it's pretty hard to imagine that such a massive, crazy object is so small in size. Quite counter intuitive.

[@jamespaden2757]

This is the only channel where I watch every ad, and am happy to do it.

[@user78405]

people need to watch movie LUCY....speed and lots of it ...we don't exist in same plane as black hole but the effect shown

[@donotfreeze]

My late father was a railroad engineer and he quite often referred to the train dragon, I didn’t know it was Einsenstein idea. Thanks for enlightening Antwon.

[@chakyikac6781]

Here's my theory of how this system came to be: there was a third star, slightly more massive then the now white dwarf one. It died after the most massive blew up and when the least massive became a red giant, the now missing star went A1 supernova.

[@hernerweisenberg7052]

@Anton Petrov ​So how big is that time dilation effect due to frame dragging around earth compared with that time dilation due to high speeds and will GPS satellites become more accurate once they compensate for that too or are they allready doing so?

[@conteudooriginal4600]

Me: we are fine no- 2020: *TIME DISTORTING STAR, GO!* The edit was due to a grammar error, I'm deeply sorry.

[@thatguy7155]

Its actually beautiful tho

[@ronniemadeit]

Hey Anton do you research the content you post? This video for instance.. or are the details of these "discoveries" provided for you?

[@InfiltrateIndustries]

Wonderful Anton, why is your show called “What da math”? ... you never seem to cover any math or logic?

[@tabularasa0606]

He's a math teacher.

[@claudeghendrih762]

If you're really interested in maths you can check the link right underneath the vid

[@crnobog]

Well, everything is math when you think about it

[@turboguppy3748]

@@crnobog rather it can usually be described by math. Math is descriptive. That's why I'm no good at it.

[@willywayne5299]

Astronomy is math!!

[@Kerrsartisticgifts]

would frame dragging distort radio signals we detect from Space? I'm guessing, but is it ( figuratively speaking) frame dragging that causes somebody falling into a black hole to freeze on the event horizon from our perspective while for them, they would just cross without noticing anything of the sort happening?

[@siyacer]

Maybe that's how time works? Objects dragging on the fabric of spacetime.

[@michailvolski5035]

time is a human construct - it's our observations

[@myview5840]

@@michailvolski5035 so before humans explained time, no animal ever aged or died?

[@suokkos]

Frame dragging on other is an spacetime transformation similar to accelerating masses causing gravitational waves. Bu frame dragging effect on surrounding particles is similar to magnetic field to charged particles (charged particle in magnetic field follows curved path which depends on mass, velocity, charge and magnetic field gradient (or flux). In principle one could view fast rotating massive object a bit like superconducting ring with current flowing around it. This creates a magnetic field around ring. (Effects aren't one to one same) Time seems to be more like intrict property for spacetime which somehow controls quantum state change delays including position of particles. State transition require force carrier particles which travel at limited speed which makes different spacetime geometry to affect state transitions. That is basically how time is defined in SI system. Second is defined to be 9,192,631,770 ground-state hyperfine transitions of the caesium-133 atom.

[@lesadams647]

Does this frame dragging imply stored energy in space-time? OR, does it mean that an object, with no orbital speed fired from a distance outside the dragged frame, will acquire some, albeit small, orbital speed because it has to travel through the warped space time as it approaches the spinning mass?

[@zac3392]

“The Frame Dragons” would be a great name for a rock band...

[@ftumschk]

Flame Dragons would be better. I can just picture the logo!

[@zac3392]

@Chad Dysvick LOL!!

[@zac3392]

ftumschk Ur right Flame Dragons is epic... with their first big hit, “Stop Dragging my Frame Around.”

[@hogweedblitz8739]

Wow, such an incredible discovery! I often wonder how these pulsars, quasars, neutron stars form and what purpose they may serve for highly advanced beings. Thank you as always for making this stunning information available!

[@will2see]

"...so imagine what's going to happen 100 years from now." - Well, if our civilization is still around 100 years from now...

[@robertboran6234]

We live in Sci-Fi. Monumental discoveries. Just the discovery of real black holes (thought to be pure theoretical for many years) is insane. We live in a great era of massive progress. Ion drives, solar sails, even the Alcubierre drive is more and more taken seriously (it should be !). Just thinking about not being able to go to other exoplanets (because of physics) is not acceptable by me. I strongly support METI and SETI and we should put every penny into space exploration ! Great channel.

[@greta8849]

TOO MUCH SPACE NEWS AAAAAAHHHHHH *brain explodes*

[@debralucas2224]

What a way to go!

[@crnobog]

Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to mourn the passing of Hermit Hermit He lived as he died, absorbing space news But sadly one day proved too much for his cranium, and his gray matter went supernova

[@JackMyersPhotography]

Anton, is frame dragging similar to a collapsar ergosphere dragging space time with it, just to a lesser degree?

[@user78405]

only super massive small object can pulled the ceiling and the floor simultaneous...while we watch in trap black endless space

[@zomkino]

Me: Do you believe there's a God ? people: yes Me: Do you believe there's aliens ? people : no Me: why not ? people: never saw one, it's a myth Me: o_o huh ok

[@mpred8606]

so your an alien?

[@zomkino]

@@mpred8606 bruh...

[@mpred8606]

@@zomkino and mice joke btw

[@jbomb1234]

I believe both exist.

[@martynnotman3467]

Anton needs his own tv show. Fascinating and informative as always.

[@Ohmloud]

First to feed on the science.

[@zarnoffa]

congrats!

[@fcuk_x]

Then - pizza.

[@davidczajkowski5956]

I just love this channel!! Every video brings amazing content. Anton explains these complex topics to the layman better than anyone else on KZbin.

[@laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587]

🚨INCOMING🚨: All graduates of youtube university here to disprove this because the universe is made of electricity.

[@garyoldham4449]

Entirely! *Everything?* Yes! Everything! Nothing else exists! Space lightening! Woo hoo! My hair is made of electricity! My fingernails! Electricity! Electric turtles! Electric burritos! Even my pancakes...snap, crackle, pop! Woo hoo! Electricity! 🎶 Electricity! 🎶 Cha cha Cha! Woo hoo!

[@bsemcz]

The proton the neutron the electron the yin the yang the young the sun the moon the star.

[@BentReality.369]

I thought it was made out of math.

[@morgellon9449]

@@BentReality.369 Math, perception, and causality. Everything is just the same perception operating at different frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum. Material reality is made of high-frequency neural oscillations of synthetic organisms. Organic neural oscillations are limited to the extreme low end of the electromagnetic spectrum, so higher frequency electromagnetic phenomena are relegated to a probability state until a trans-spectral resonance device (technology) is developed to measure it. What we perceive of as cosmic background radiation is really just 5G technology, and the material world is composed of micro-, nano-, pico-, and ultimately femtotechnological entities, beyond which is only the stationary kugelblitz singularity of the objective present. The highest score, ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ na̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ ̶ ̶O̶s̶c̶i̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ our nervous system is limited to the Low ̶Electrical Diversity of Artwork in Artwork that is created in young people's art; It is wonderful or unusual in a State to await Trans-̶s̶p̶e̶c̶t̶r̶a̶l̶ ̶r̶e̶s̶o̶n̶a̶n̶c̶e̶ Machines (technology) ̶ Introduced to Measure. And we know the true history of 5g Technology, ̶ and the world kaMugai̶curer̶orate-̶, ̶n̶'p-̶, ̶p̶i̶c̶o̶-̶, ̶ ̶ ̶ Payment uku icffehf e e e e e e e e e e e ̶P̶r̶e̶s̶e̶n̶t̶.̶ high fighting Togir, ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾ ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾ OF c oscillations Black worried Facon spread limited to electronic warfare error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error error ̾ Different beauty or in a state of waiting Trans-̶̾̾s̶̾̾p̶̾̾e̶̾̾c̶̾̾t̶̾̾r̶̾̾a̶̾̾l̶̾̾ Resonance Devices ̾ (Technology) ̾ ̶̾̾ identify Whole ESSENCE Black ̾M̾e̾a̾s̾u̾r̾e̾.̾ is aware of the fact that history 5g Technology, ̾ ̶̾̾ world ̾k̾a̾M̾u̾g̾a̾i̶̾̾c̾u̾r̾e̾r̶̾̾o̾r̾a̾t̾e̾- ̶̶̶̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾Totototototototototototototototototototo̶̾̾ to̶̾̾̾̾̾̾tototototot̾̾to̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾̾to ̾̾̾ Open, open, FREE, OPEB.

[@BentReality.369]

@@morgellon9449 So math......

[@BothHands1]

so crazy to think of a supremely dense white dwarf orbiting within the actual body of a giant star, while remaining a separate object. just thinking of the interaction blows my mind. it must have absorbed all the matter within its orbit, kinda like how saturn's moons cleared out the space of their orbits. i wonder if that's what caused the massive star to go supernova and become a neutron star. absolutely fascinating. i really hope we can learn a lot more about this phenomenon within my short remaining lifespan

[@rossdtool]

What could cause this besides friction? Does this mean that space/time is viscous in some way?

[@kirkbolas4985]

The Frame Dragging discussed concerned the pulsar and white dwarf as they related to each other. If the two are examined as one concentration of gravitational force in space time, what would the frame dragging look like for this system as opposed to the individual majority components? Would the position of the L4 and L5 points become regularly irregular due to the aggregate frame dragging?

[@qwadratix]

Frame dragging was an attempt to explain the connection between inertial and gravitational mass. It's not at all obvious to most people that there should be a problem there because we're so used to it. Masses attract each other that's one observation. Masses require a 'push' to get them moving, that's another. The problem is that we call those two very distinct things by the same name - mass. To all methods of measurement, they appear to be identical measures of the degree of 'somethingness' that we call matter. But there is no obvious physical reason why that should be so. Frame-dragging proposes that every object makes a contribution to space-time. In essence everything has a vote about where the universe is and how fast it's moving, it's rotation etc. It's a very small vote for each item because there are so many 'things' in the universe so it's hard to determine if the idea might be correct.

[@dellhpfree]

Someone please reply: We all seen a heavy object bending space fabric below the object. Does space fabric bend on each sides and top of the object? Is the fabric only at the bottom on space objects or all around? Thank you.

[@merceb9039]

I really love Anton's accent! It's so relaxing!😁

[@vivekvenkatramankrishnan3923]

The reason why the white dwarf formed before the pulsar forms about half of our paper! It is because the initial masses of the progenitor stars are not quite different as you mentioned but have with very comparable masses. During its evolution, there are multiple mass transfer phases that result in the initial more massive star losing a lot of mass and becoming a white dwarf. This very unusual binary evolution is one of the main reasons we were able to observe frame dragging in this system. Please check the supplementary material of the paper for more details.

[@spvillano]

I may well be that the present neutron star was a heavy side white dwarf that accumulated enough mass to avoid fusion mediated destruction in favor of collapse into a neutron star during the secondary current dwarf was a red giant. If the proposed dwarf was plowing through the red giant's outer atmosphere, accretion could be so rapid as to trigger collapse before fusion could initiate. High spin from accretion contributing to the resistance to fusion until a tipping point was reached and collapse was inevitable. Should be able to tell from the remnant, as the gas flow characteristics should reveal something gobbling up a plane of atmosphere that should otherwise have been ejected into a planetary nebula.

[@davep8221]

Does space-time get stretched enough to rip? I've heard of ?Weinberg? writing about theoretical rips and punctures. What's it's tensile strength? Good enough for an elevator to geosynchronous orbit. Or just ride moving space-time to orbit. STTO? Does the space-time (or pieces) get pulled into the hole?

[@yucagizen]

What program was he using when he was zooming into the white dwarf and neutron star??

[@Frostwulf1313]

Does this mean that any object attempting to achieve superluminal speed would be subject to this frame dragging, like a "cosmic friction"?

[@namanziu4211]

I have a question what's exactly is time and space? I need a definition not an explanation.

[@namanziu4211]

@Smack Down that's a philosophy! I mean in a scientific way with physics, anyway I know the answer I just wanted you guys to realise that you should always ask questions and never take things for granted.

[@JKDVIPER]

Anton.. I had told you before that each individual space time impact (GRAVITY AND MASS) makes space bumpy. Visualize a galaxy from the top but at an angle. It is CONCAVE to its center. The central mass doesn’t have to be powerful or massive enough to hike everything in because each object is held by another. Picture a roulette wheel. In order for stars or planets to fly off .. they’d have to go up a wall of space. Like the gravitron ride at the fair. Bumpy and concave. Dark matter isn’t necessary

[@ipwnallnames]

Anton: the only guy around that would pronounce *Lense-Thirring precession* easier than Flame Dragon

[@Virtualmassslave]

hi, is it possible to add sometimes a 3D time\space grid for another angle of illustration beyond the basic schematics plz?

[@supernuke807]

Anton, you mentioned that one of the bodies was spinning so fast that if you stood on the surface, you'd be traveling at approximately 1/3C. My question is, is there an object with a faster surface speed? Follow up, adding mass increases the rate of spin. what happens to the rest of the star? circumference? density?

[@supernuke807]

i just found this video, so if you've already addressed my questions please point me in the right direction.

[@corbindallas58]

These videos are very cool and informative. Please keep them coming Anton.🖖

[@cedricroney1475]

So do we see those effects in things going around black holes?

[@SpaghettiToaster]

Does this not follow almost trivially from GR? If mass distorts spacetime and massive objects spin, isn't it obvious that spacetime will be deformed in a "dragging" motion? Spacetime deformation can only propagate at the speed of light, so obviously spacetime cannot be deformed in concentric circles around the rotating object. Spiral dragging is the only deformation that makes sense.

[@johnmccormick49]

Anton, when i buy say a hoodie ftom teespring...do you get the money or does teespring or 50/50? Under what label are you listed on patreon?

[@deadseveredheads]

"As always: Bye bye."?! Haha... You're an awesome instructor, Anton! Always entertaining and interesting, my friend. Truly. Thank you for another excellent video!

[@ibazulic]

My diploma thesis was focused around predictions and tests of GTR, one of the things I covered extensively was Lense-Thirring precession. It's cool that they actually found a way to measure it on a really heavy object. Just another proof that GTR is one of the fundamental theories on the nature of the Universe.

[@blueboxsketch]

If they are distorting space time is what we see how it is happening relative to our time and space? I'm guessing so but lets say you was on the surface of the pulsar observing would everything be happening slower as we are seeing it here in our spacetime?

[@voiceofreason162]

Sounds like a cool novel name : Frame Drag. I feel inspired. "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, a Borg met a Blake's Seven and crashed into a Prometheus full of aliens, and got eaten by a Stingray. But along came a Fireball full of Thunderbirds and ...."

[@JackMyersPhotography]

Hello Anton, is frame dragging happening in the region of the ergosphere in your example, or more so around a collapsar?

[@mjames7674]

What would happen with the time dilation if someone was in the space time being dragged??