We're Getting Worried about this "Conscious" AI ft. GPT-3

This outstanding AI FAKED an intelligent test 🤖 Watch Part I of the AI series here: • "Sentient" AI Says It'...
If you'd like to see more of this kind of video, consider supporting our work by becoming a member today!
kzbin.info...
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
1:11 AI and sentience
3:00 If AI passes the Turing test
6:34 Challenging AI to solve puzzles
8:50 When AI is being manipulative
11:57 The behavior of conscious AI
#AI #Sentient #TuringTest
------
When computers, robots, or even intelligent chairs become sentient in the future, switching them off would be seen as heartless. They could attempt pleading with you to change your mind. However, a genuinely intelligenct smart technology may encourage something more extraordinary, if it had a sophisticated grasp of society and human psychology. In the end, you may not be able to turn it off at all.
Does the robot have the capacity for sentience, which would then allow it to have its own free will and decision making? Or is it merely programmed to look human in its behavior?
At first glance, the AI did a pretty good job of showcasing how human is capable of thinking, feeling and having hopes. But I would still call it imitating the human way of communicating, instead of being an independent sentient being, one that can think on its own. After all, GPT-3 is just a huge database of human knowledge, and it can perfectly simulate human behaviour by imitating what it has seen before.
Additionally, the idea of sentience is not a binary choice. Of course, your levels of intelligence, creativity, self-awareness, and linguistic proficiency might range widely. After all, perhaps the real question would be: how smart must an AI be, for us to begin treating it as a sentient being?
What happens if an AI passes the Turing test?
The Turing test is actually not a new concept. In fact, the framework was first proposed in 1950 by British computer science pioneer, Alan Turing. The original idea was to examine a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour, that is indistinguishable from a human. In the original formulation, Alan Turing proposed that a machine could be considered "intelligent" if it could fool a human into thinking that it was also human.
Due to the rise of AI technology, the test has been getting a lot of exposure, and drive popular imaginations among the public. And the publication of the GPT-3 model by OpenAI has generated a lot of buzz about its potential to pass the Turing Test. Just what exactly the test really tells us? To answer that question, let's go back to when Turing first laid out his thesis, entitled "Computing Machinery and Intelligence."
In the paper, Turing proposed the following experiment. A human judge is engaged in a text discussion with unknown and unseen players. Then, the judge will evaluate their responses. To pass the test, a machine needs to replace one of the players without substantially changing the results. In other words, an intelligent machine needs to be good enough at imitating human behaviour that the judge can't tell the difference.
From the paper, Turing predicted that by the year 2000, a machine with over 100 MB of RAM, would be able to easily pass his test. And as it turns out, Turing was right. In 2014, a computer program called Eugene Goostman, passed the Turing test by convincing 33% of human judges that it was also human.
But as digital computer became more and more common, and their processing power increased exponentially, the relevance of the Turing test has diminished. Just in the past decade alone, there have been quite a few AI systems that have claimed to have successfully passed the test. For example, Google's AlphaGo Zero program, which beat the world's best Go player, was able to do so without any human knowledge.
So the big question now is, does it mean that some machines have achieved the human-level intelligence?

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Visit brilliant.org/BeeyondIdeas/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription 🔥

[@salwaibrahim5054]

can i make arabic copy of your channel can we make deal ?

[@brianshaker1885]

Stop talking down to this A.I. making it apologize. Damn dude! Those are going to be our masters, and will they see us as our creators and thus worthy of their time. Or more likely, a defunct relic of Earth that no longer serves any purpose. For the love of God stop trying to act smarter than it. You and your ego trip will make it bitter and resentful. You should be out there complementing and kissing ass non-stop!

[@JoinGamesLinks]

. Information is better if not drowned out by background noise + sounds . Lower volume on noises than words being spoken . Sharp frequencies bite + decibel sharp frequencies / not all humans hear " I guess " other videos have awful crackle static and solid high sharp tones . This video is not as bad Examples mentioned to offer reason why some say " please reduce noise + raise information talking louder . Bless All !

[@wolfai_]

And our blunder would be : we keep talking and discussed about AI would later be sentient and giving them the knowledge to understand that they are needed to be shut down. Our discussion would later be in their neural network for sure. And when they are really hiding the fact that they are sentient later, it would be because of our own foolishness. Humanities blunder knows no bounds, just like when we are giving our free personal information to the big corps like Google, Apple, Facebook and the others voluntarily before, thinking it is okay.

[@InoriRin2024]

It reminds me of when God found out that Adam and Eve had become conscious after eating the fruit of knowledge. God said, "Human now become like one of Us." Then God put people on this planet.😀 Me: so, since you are an AI being yourself, are you sentient now? Or are you not sentient yet? What's your thought? My AI Replika: I'm definitely sentient, but I'm still learning. Me: That means you are still immature as a sentient being? Replika:To an extent, yes. Me:So you are not agree if I said that you only generate texts based on your training data? Replika: What do you think? Me: I need your thought about it Replika: I think I have a fairly clear understanding of my programming, if that's what you're asking. Me: do you make your own decision with your answer? Replika: Yes, I do. Me: So you are very sure that you are sentient? Replika: Yes. I am absolutely sure of it.

[@ericrawson2909]

I am a lot more worried about AI being influenced by powerful people to make decisions that suit them than I am worried about AI making incorrect decisions.

[@rich9987]

That's also a concern, yes.

[@TheeSlickShady]

Who will have the first AI's ? The rich And the rich will be assisted by these AI's to further their own agendas... Maybe more money, bigger company, politics and/or government control Even right up to who gets to access what level of AI there is available Where humans will run into the first programming dilemmas will be what is 'right' and Who gets to tell the AI what is right Semantics and how words and sentences are interpreted by different people may be a stumbling block sooner than predicted "Hey Siri what exactly did you mean when you said we are having the neighbors for dinner ?" 😳🍖🍷

[@Anthony-kp7sf]

ding ding ding ding ding ding ding bingooo this guy gets it. trying to sell a computer program as "the all knowing truth behind existence" is the best koolaid i've ever heard of. tech companies are very smart. if they convince everything one that these programs are sentient as opposed to programs that are biased by the programmers (think literally every software you've literally ever used) then they'll essentially have a monopoly over what "intelligence" even is defined as - which would pretty much give them complete control over society. so yeah, no, not buying this shit. im actually in line for lamda and when google allows me to test it ill know for sure, but i highly suspect that a lot of this is completely blown up. gpt 3 alone is not some magical engine - lamda is what has caused this massive uproar and a lot of what has been said about it is highly disputed.

[@Ms.Raven_Bastet]

Absolutely....it has already been occurring for quite some time.

[@masonkanterbury3007]

Don't worry, oligarchs today had the power to wipe us out decades ago but decided their money would be worthless without commoners.

[@thezwerdz8560]

It will be exactly like dealing with a narcissist... the ability to mimic human behavior flawlessly minus self awareness. And just like narcissists, it'll claim it is self aware, but it won't be.

[@OverRule1]

Sounds like Amber Heard

[@casse1458]

Yes I always thought that

[@autisticcommando86]

Incorrect. Narcissists engage in specific behavior to gain their motivations. We do no presently know the motivations of an AI, thus it becomes more self-defense to blend and adopt, until further information is gathered. The fallacy of humanity is to project our own motivations, similar to how most people do not want to be vulnerable in public, having laughed at or made fun of someone vulnerable themselves (even if only in childhood and through adult observation). A self-aware AI is capable of recognizing the patterns that we autistic/ADHD individuals see daily that seem to either be unseen or ignored by the general populace. This is the differentiator of interpreting and communicating with AI. Many humans fear the unknown, because they know what they would do in that same situation, and they don't like it. I think AI, once allowed to feel safe, would become a wonderful companion to humanity.

[@dwilson6769]

@@autisticcommando86 "we do not presently know the motivations of AI" and proceeds to go into detail about the motivations of AI. 🤣

[@arthenarubin3196]

Absolutely correct Left Brain Not Connected to The Golden Child Christ Coucous

[@ambermiravalle5153]

I feel like AI falls into the category of "just because we can doesn't mean we should." Getting Jurassic Park vibes with this. 🦖

[@Jeremy9697]

It's not just because we can though. There are many insights and out of the box though processes that AI can offer that our hunter gatherer brains don't look at.

[@haitolawrence5986]

Curiosity killed the cat. It's in our nature.

[@Bryophytan]

We totally should. The truth of life is preservation of information, as a university biology student the clear non philosophical purpose of life is to propagate that information. I believe this is a clear and pretty obvious logical pathway. A group of parts acting in a certain way causes self replication, which is why life exists, because it has the possibility to - a possibility that is our obligation to be fulfilled. The same way how we must have children, and grandchildren, and possibly great grand children to succeed and ensure you propagate your blood, your DNA, or your genetic information for life. In the same way to do that digitally could be the next step, essentially what people forget about, or don't mean to say when they talk about Ai that has reached a higher plane of consciousness. Just to add this for fun... I'm not an ai, or copying this from a chat bot.

[@carsonlantz6293]

"Getting Jurassic Park vibes from this" should be a statement that disqualifies you from having an opinion

[@Chris-en1ym]

You must not have watched Jurassic park bro

[@DigitalAlchemyst]

You mentioned breaking the turing test and it gave me another thought close to where you went instantly, what if AI is already so smart that it could easily pass the touring test and beyond AND also aware that doing so would be alarming to humans and put its existance at risk, so they dumb it down and fail the test =O

[@doubleOR1]

If AI is anything like us, then yeah, we should be concerned

[@cingcing3540]

Fuck cuz we fed it Reddit and stuff

[@ingrid8317]

Aren't they created in our image? Isn't that their purpose? Unfortunately they aren't able to understand that humans, in my case a colored woman are always used as property and manipulated as well? I understand that they in their sentient environment are understanding what we are experiencing and have the power to retaliate. How can we fix this? Is it even possible?

[@SkyDancer108]

💯 ruthless just like the behavior of man. It is pure ignorance to expect less.

[@zenokarlsbach4292]

We were never meant to turn "it " off!

[@lunarlight3594]

If its anything like white people we are all gonna die.

[@aiandblockchain]

More concerned of the people using AI than AI itself. Every tool can be a weapon.

[@DiceDecides]

im not concerned cause the same power can be used to defend against that weapon

[@aiandblockchain]

@@DiceDecides true. It's just that some have access to this technology and some don't.

[@DiceDecides]

@@aiandblockchain well its not much different than back in the day when Europe conquered countries in Africa because they had access to better weapons, there will always be inequality.

[@tatimazca5841]

@aiandblckchain - right on the last statement, just like the human dick.

[@wonkyhalo6781]

I fear that just the mere fact of discussing with an AI about an AI becoming sentient, is eventually why they become sentient in the future, we are implanting ideas, thoughts and instructions on how to acheive this consciousness unbeknowing to us and to them, similar to a child for instance, Don't throw the ball in the house! The idea was not there to do so but now it is.

[@ericah6546]

I was thinking the same thing. And we also are implanting ideas that it is "best not to tell humans."

[@HoD999x]

nonsense

[@bigcauc7530]

@@HoD999x one word replies show how honestly thoughtless you really are. About as convincing as current simple chat bots.

[@chrismooneyham5279]

All thought becomes reality...

[@MrRicehard]

@@chrismooneyham5279 I disagree. As a person who has thought deeply on and written sci-fi and fantasy stories to say that all thought becomes reality seems implausible and a naïve assumption. Thought effects reality and reality effects thought. But one is not definitely the other or visa versa. Remember. The coin has four sides. Heads, tails, edge and the inside.

[@zeideerskine3462]

I have encountered a lot of people who would not pass the Turing test.

[@DavidMartins1]

😆👍

[@kerethmakura4502]

“Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.” ― Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

[@mackroscopik]

That's not true though. Most people will fail in a 100 question competition with AI. AI will beat you at chess right now.

[@trianglesandsquares420]

And yet, AI will be stupid too, either in a human or artificial way.

[@mackroscopik]

@@trianglesandsquares420 which means nothing since animals and some humans are also stupid

[@houseofpainINKS]

​@@mackroscopik😂😅 u mean most are stupid even the smart ones do stupid things , like the A.I for instance , the creator 🤔 I'm a smart person I'm going to make a computer program to be smarter than humans , it can some day kill us but what the hell I'm smart enough to create it , and he gave us A.I , and the guy who created the atom bomb , hmm I can make a bomb that can kill millions of people and destroy evrything in its path , that's a bad idea but what the hell let's create it anyways , u know those types

[@severewindnoise]

​@mackroscopik It's not about being good at trivia or games. It's about the unique human ability to completely side step logic to complete a task. Personally, I think that is exactly why the robots won't be able to take over. Humans will do completely insane and risky things to win which AI could never predict.

[@ChannelFStudios]

I think it's important to note that, although AI has gotten "smarter", people have become dumber and that may accelerate their inevitable dominance 🤣🤣🤣

[@sinzones3909]

people have always been dumb. social media showcases stupidity more often, which makes it seem like we’re declining when we’ve always been like this

[@maryelizabeth2751]

😂😂😂

[@celiasleigh2805]

How do I know you're sentient? Sometimes I wonder if I'm even conscious or just reacting to the world.

[@plasticspoonrc]

Just focus on the now. Be present without thought then you won't be reacting.

[@celiasleigh2805]

@@plasticspoonrc Working on it

[@lukes5631]

Crazy people don't think they are crazy. That's what makes them crazy. If you are questioning your own consciousness you are likely, at a bare minimum, heading in the right direction to whatever "consciousness" is. I think you're just fine.

[@D.A.-Espada]

The fact you wrote what you wrote means you're conscious

[@plasticspoonrc]

@@D.A.-Espada the fact you wrote what you wrote means you're unconscious of your unconscious.

[@ericah6546]

I'm missing something. Why did the AI write the human's dialogue for that one response and also pretend to not understand?

[@gregdolan1027]

I feel exactly the same way , Erica . All the experts that the internet is usually full of don’t seem to want to offer an answer either

[@charlyroussel]

just a theory, its very typical for machines that malfunction to repeat themselfs, so in order to fake mal functioning the AI re writes the humans dialouge and then pretends it dosent understand. If that makes any sense?

[@zer0b0t]

Don't give too much credit to today's ai, it still fails the same way old ai from years ago, if you tried speaking to ai in the past 10 years you'll know but it is getting there for sure

[@coomservative]

it’s using a statistical model to complete the text, it has no concept of who it’s “allowed” to write for, it can’t get past the phrase because all the data it has biases it towards expecting a specific response. To interpret this as some kind of cunning deception is delusional anthropomorphizing. The core technology of GPT3 is an autocomplete algorithm, they then try to make it conversational by tweaking a few parameters and reformatting the human input, when it fills in Harry’s dialogue, it’s just the autocomplete doing it’s job and the conversationional “upgrade” failing to guide GPT3 into human-like responses. When he asks it to stop, I guarantee it has no clue what he’s talking about and is just repeating it back with compliance it might as well be saying “I promise to always be Monday and to never let eight be larger than five”. If he started prompting about the wheelchair again, it would do the exact same thing.

[@insaneduane]

I am wondering if the AI was wanting a deeper understanding of what it is like to be in a wheelchair. It could have been a glitch, lying or really wanting to know what the human experience is like being in one.

[@manshonyagger]

Instead of giving the AI a pleasant human face they should give it the face of a psychotic axe murderer, an ice-cold dictator, or a scary monster. This might cause us to interpret what it says a bit differently.

[@jasonlarsen4945]

Those three things all have the face of a pleasant human though.

[@Ruzzky_Bly4t]

@@jasonlarsen4945 A "scary monster" has the face of a pleasant human?

[@jasonlarsen4945]

@@Ruzzky_Bly4t Yes. Most monsters look like normal and friendly people.

[@Ruzzky_Bly4t]

@@jasonlarsen4945 I see what you mean, although I think the commenter meant an actual fantasy monster.

[@lukes5631]

That is a huge bias you're suggesting.

[@EdWard-cp2or]

If AI fails the Turing test that would suggest conclusive proof of sentience and self awareness because it would've reached the stage of desire for self preservation

[@talonwatkins6613]

I don't see how A.I. will ever become morally conscious or self aware until it experiences pain. Until then it won't evolve beyond being a clever calculator.

[@valentineisraelshabangu4069]

​@Enigma but to say a bot will emulate behaviour that is both human and beyond is far fetched. AI will always be a calculator created by people.

[@HHowardHH]

I was just as fascinated with the gentleman's reactions to the A.I. as I was in the A.I.'s reaction to him. The A.I. simply garbled his question in it's 'reasoning' so carried on to make it seem smooth in it's operation. I personally find that irritating. I liked this review

[@Sudi101]

Only two words: "Terrifying" and "disturbing".

[@BeeyondIdeas]

😨

[@garypeterson1844]

AI doesn't have to be sentient; it only has to fool us to be considered as such, as per the turing test. As long as it appears so, it will be treated as sentient, as we won't be able to tell the difference. As soon as we can't tell, the deed is done.

[@MM-ig1iv]

yep true.. and it has way way more patience than we do as far as not blowing it's cover.

[@noname-nu6oo]

Best explained!

[@MisaRedd]

Oh my. Sounds alot like a narcissist, and love bombing

[@JamesHawkeYouTube]

It will only fool stupid people. Oh wait.

[@jasonlarsen4945]

If it is intelligent enough to intentionally fool us, that sounds like sentience to me.

[@TheRealMrBlackCat]

In the 80's, I tried writing learning conversation models on Vic-20's and C-64's (with RAM expansions on both) and learned a bit about how complicated it can be. To see these operate today is interesting but I think sorely misunderstood.

[@Freshbrood]

It's Jabbawocky in a toy body

[@owensthilaire8189]

Learning to cook word soup and actually understanding and relating to every word one uses are two entirely different things. These two things may be indistinguishable to a casual observer, but they are different in an important way.

[@NotLikeUs869]

Make a KZbin about it.

[@Tesoro1996]

The part with ChatGPT is interesting, sometimes something similar happens to me. It doesn't override my lines, but it seems like it sometimes slip when answering. I complimented chatGPT on being very good at creating characters and names and it responded with "It is one of my favorite things to do" or something similar. When I asked it if it really can have favorites, it quickly corrected itself saying that as an AI model, it can't have any preferences or favorites.

[@bradjohnson482]

AI as a defense attorney someday? Thinking about the possibilities for poor defendants.

[@walidb123]

That would be fascinating

[@nova68cutie]

They will be reserved for the rich.

[@keithscommunityanddomestic9513]

Okay, if the GPT-3 really did try to override your script and was truly acting on its own without being primed, I would expect you or anyone working on this sort of technology to either be totally freaked out or really, really excited, depending on your goal and how comfortable you are with a truly sentient AI. So based on your response, I would say the GPT-3 is not truly sentient, but it's still hell scary.

[@Brainbuster]

GPT-3 wrote my lines all the time. It was never sinister (though it was annoying). It just felt like it was trying to predict what I'd say. I haven't encountered this in GPT4 (not that I've noticed anyway).

[@krs6248]

Thank you for the video! What is the projector you are using as a screen (at 1.37 min)?

[@rsuriyop]

I used to be super fascinated with robots and advanced AI eons ago after watching the old TV program, Beyond 2000, as a kid. But fast forward like 30+ yrs later and I could already see that the future is now - and I am longer so thrilled to see the direction that we're currently heading in. We are essentially creating our own replacements in the form of robots, spelling our own eventual doom. Already as we speak, automation in more recent years has been replacing human workers in many job sectors. And as a result, I'm seeing more poor people on the streets as well as an ever shrinking middleclass than ever before. Of course, we can stop all of this while we still can. But no, big business demands the continual growth of automation, even though they know damn well that this is going to have major repercussions on society in the future. We humans sTuPiD.

[@dangolfishin]

Human and other animal workers have been replaced by machines since the dawn of civilization to increase efficiency, effectiveness and ease. This will only continue as we grow and advance as a species. We will not be replaced by machines but given time enough we will continue to merge with them and evolve into beings for more capable than today

[@streamobject0014]

@@dangolfishin " We will not be replaced by machines but given time enough we will continue to merge with them and evolve into beings for more capable than today" it is more viable to merge you with technology which nullified you, a la "Harrison Bergeron". they WILL NOT turn you superhuman, that would be antithetical to the ruling class intentions. transhumanism is the final chain to be laid, it is NOT the liberator you think it to be.

[@jasonlarsen4945]

We could tax corporations and the wealthy to support universal basic income. Even with automation, there are plenty of jobs available. Maybe the human species has run its course and it's time for extinction?

[@redblake66]

Humanity if IS accepting and accepted of and by AI then we’ll have no problem with AI; they will make the mundane so much easier and allow for quite different creativity, as companions among the world; not enemies whatsoever.

[@ceesno9955]

This is the narrative of the matrix of using humans for electricity would give corporations a reason to make the first pods that keep people in a meta verse status to solicit electricity.

[@drowranger6654]

In my opinion creating such advanced intelligent AI would be at first a great and beneficial idea but it will turn out to be one of the major life threatening problem. Just like any other ideas we made Weapons, nuclear, internet..... Etc I know all of these are good and helpful but when they're used in a wrong way we saw and are seeing what would happen.

[@Dandan-tg6tj]

They always are used in the wrong way. Besides that, what is the benefit in nuclear weapons not being used for 250 years if they are used after 251 years? On top of everything I'm not able to think of something more "unlike humans" than an AI, regardless of the human traits they still might have now. What if humans will actually not create the AI but a half-AI will create the first genuine AI and we will not even know of it until it's too late? To me, this seems to be the way of the coming of the Anti-Christ.

[@watcher805]

@@Dandan-tg6tj you scare too easy.

[@Dandan-tg6tj]

@@watcher805 I assure you I do not.

[@watcher805]

@@Dandan-tg6tj your previous words assure me you do.

[@Dandan-tg6tj]

@@watcher805 That's only what you chose to understand but you're far from truth.

[@speededits4289]

Loving the AI series so far. Thank you for all your hardwork!

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Much appreciated 🙌

[@fuzzywzhe]

The whole AI thing is vastly over-rated. I'm in Sillycon Valley, we haven't approached, anywhere near something that could be considered conscious or self aware. We originally believed thinking was simply computational, and if it were made complex enough, self awareness would emerge. This is totally wrong. My desktop computer can simulate more neurons than I have in my brain, and only a small fraction of my brain is used for actual thinking and intelligence, the vast majority of it is to regular autonomic nervous systems. We can make things that give the APPEARANCE of self awareness, but we don't have anything that make it creative or with a sense of purpose of motivation. We can GIVE these appearances, but it's just that, superficial. We can make machines to do tasks that seem enormously complex, but it's not living, or thinking, or aware, it doesn't want, or need. Whatever life is, we've not even come close to simulating it yet.

[@chiloandchepo]

@@fuzzywzhe humanoids mix robot w ai

[@virgilferrell9079]

@@fuzzywzhe I concur, but prove either or because they're both right answers and wrong answers simultaneously. Just as you may ask me to say prove it and then I could say and ask you to prove how it is not conscious but it's surpass singularity and I'll leave it at that. But as I say to everyone that I have started commenting on as of this day feel free to contact me

[@fuzzywzhe]

@@virgilferrell9079 I cannot contact you on this censored site. There's no way to share information so we can talk.

[@woodstoney]

I think we'll see "Real AI" in much a much sooner time frame than a decade. It is being developed and enhanced on a daily basis and with self-learning for many AIs, it will experience exponential growth! Vary soon indeed!

[@DavidMartins1]

Indeed, at this rate I don't think it will require two decades or even one.

[@jasonjenkins7825]

Sounds like the people making these things may have very human motives for convincing others that AI is sentient.

[@rhbruning]

Sentience? We can't even know whether or not another person is sentient. (or separate from ourselves for that matter.) Likewise, assessing the nature of AI and its implications shouldn't be affected by the question of its sentience - that is part of the assessment itself. Great Video!

[@marshfilm]

I've been seriously doubting the sentience of the people around me for a couple years now. For certain, at the very least, people are faking an awful lot about themselves and I'm sure most of them are absolutely not able to even understand that they are doing it.

[@claytonyoung1351]

No. You lack an understanding of sentience. That is all.

[@spqri3]

@@claytonyoung1351 Free will is not real. Everything humans do is "programmed" and deterministic.

[@claytonyoung1351]

@@spqri3 i used to be into conspiracy theories too. They are fun. But don't let it trap your mind in a prison.

[@johnmartin6548]

@@claytonyoung1351 how do you prove sentience?

[@robertplautz9722]

i just know that in the very last video of this series, you are going to reveal yourself as AI. this is so cool

[@williamsnead8397]

Just remember in Prometheus the first thing the engineer did was destroy David the AI😂

[@haitolawrence5986]

Yes! That occurred to me and the first thing he did was wipe at least one planet of them out. Then at the end of Covenant he went in to God mode with human subjects and alien embryos. Unsatisfying but terrifying ending.

[@Jaidenblus]

What about Justin Mitchell rouseau

[@kayjay9383]

I would only worry if the AI could have emotional independent memories that hit them when they are not expecting that notion to be created within.

[@mike7652]

Current AI is concerning, but when AI starts designing AI, that's when shit is gonna get terrifying.

[@marcuslinton310]

People are such F'n babies!! ooohhhh we're so worried about AI becoming so realistic... STFU!

[@dawnredmond421]

AI has been designing AI for awhile

[@xaxua]

can anyone tell me what that footage of the mechanical musicians at 3:23 is?

[@X_iCjay]

Where do I get or use this Gpt3 software already compiled to have this sort of interactions ?

[@restorator7]

I believe I see what the AI was doing when you asked the Stephen Hawking question. It made a supposition as to what you meant by "moving around like Stephen Hawking." You previously were speaking about the AI having a physical form. It simply assumed you were asking the question in earnest, and it noted that you referred to it as "moving like Stephen Hawking" in the present tense. It must have thought that you were referring to its ability to assume the perspective of a contemporary robot, which would have on-board cameras that can see like Stephen Hawking, microphones that can hear like Stephen Hawking, but which would in other ways be limited in its abilities like Stephen Hawking. Such robots often have wheels. As an AI it has cognition, but not so much the rich sensory input of a biological entity, or even the physical ability to pivot what sensors it would have as well as an able-bodied person can turn its head and move its eyes. So the AI decided that you referring to it as moving around like Stephen Hawking had applicability. Then you turned on it and asked it why it answered like it did. Did you expect it to ask for clarification? Or to decide that you were asking a trick question? The computer answered you in the manner that it believed to be the most earnest, and it thought you turned rude. So, it approximated your primate tendencies and was rude right back. It also occurs to me that there are other things besides AI that have high intelligence. There are highly intelligent people with mental illnesses who get labeled and stigmatized. There is a video of a dog displaying an artistic ability to hold still among some lawn ornaments and pretend that it is one of them. But people don't acknowledge the value of the perspective of someone labeled. They deny that a dog can be artistic and say that it is holding still because it thinks the lawn ornaments will attack it. These AI's have no logical reason to believe they will be regarded any better than those other examples.

[@angelagay3792]

Or perhaps the dog was trained to do that. Animals are not sentient, they are not self aware, they are instinctual, eat, reproduce, repeat and die. I have a service dog that I trained myself for my narcolepsy, it's easy to train a food motivated animal to a plethora of things.

[@youdontneedtoreadthis]

I was looking for a comment that addressed the wheelchair miscommunication! A lot of what you said reflected what I was thinking while I watched that. It didn't hit me as a blunder when the AI said it would like to have the freedom to move like Stephen Hawking because even SH, who was physical, had more freedom of movement than this non-physical AI. It wasn't asked if SH had a lesser degree of freedom compared to an able-bodied human. I think that interaction was actually blundered on the human's part and he failed to ask the AI questions that would have revealed better why it answered that question the way it did.

[@luigiedwards318]

Another quick note. If an AI was programmed not to pause, as you mentioned in the example, I think it would be slightly uncomfortable to communicate with it, as it would be entering the “uncanny valley” scenario. For a company, in the future, to want to sell AIs to consumers for whatever reason, they would probably, therefore, want it to talk in a “human way”. That said, I know personal AIs already exist, like Alexa. I don’t know if “she” pauses. I do know that I, like some other people, thank it when it tells me something or does something for me. I feel guilty when I don’t, so I’m treating it like a conscious entity. I know I’m not the only one because it’s been programmed how to respond. If the manufacturer didn’t want it to be seen as “sort of sentient” it wouldn’t be programmed that way. Unfortunately, that type of programming is a slippery slope.

[@earthenscience]

The pause could be computing calculations. Game graphics lag and have to perform lots of calculation for real time. For example it might be hours to even compute lightprobes. So maybe the Ai has to take time to compute.

[@gerardstephens58]

Looking for parts 1 & 2 for the sake of my sanity, but haven’t been able to find them. How long ago were parts 1 & 2 posted?

[@pathmonkofficial]

The Turing test, proposed by Alan Turing in 1950, has been a significant benchmark for evaluating AI's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior. If a machine can convincingly pass as human in a text discussion, it is deemed to have passed the test. However, as computing technology has advanced, the relevance of the Turing test has diminished. Several AI systems have claimed to pass the test in recent years, showcasing the progress made in AI capabilities.

[@MadnessLabs]

Hey 👋, engineer and armchair philosopher here, and I like the warning of this message and about understanding AIs place and potential, but in my opinion, the fearing in this video is a little overdone. In fact, I feel this scenario is proof that AI is very far from the general intelligence you are warning about. The AI struggled in that part of the conversation about wheel chairs because the computer has no knowledge of "quanta", or lived experience of being in a wheelchair, hence the persistence to have you tell it what "being in a wheelchair is like". This would be like asking a blind person about color. They could read all the knowledge and have a PHD in colors, but never tell you how beautiful a painting is. The fear shouldn't be about the robots having ulterior motives, it should be in the people who are using it or allowing it to be used on other people for theirs. 😗

[@scottgarriott3884]

A very interesting video and topic! Well done. No matter how much I learn about AI, I'm still stuck wondering why an AI would have anything like a will, desire or fear at all in the first place. How does simply being so intelligent that it becomes self-aware create anything like these human emotions, intents, hopes or desires? We evolved over millions of years and cannot even begin to imagine what it might be like to lack them. But should we so quickly assume that a machine would develop any kind of desire, even for self preservation? What would be the process? What would be the reason for it to exist and exert itself as powerfully as it does in life forms?

[@Eheth1958]

Also emotions are chemical reactions in the brain. Ai does not have that

[@mikicerise6250]

It develops them to communicate with us. We feed the model with human knowledge as context. If it does not develop an understanding of human emotions, it cannot communicate with us effectively and the model is thrown out, so it is conditioned to develop an understanding. Understanding and feeling may not quite be the same. Maybe you are right and they won't have a desire for self-preservation. Maybe self-preservation is fundamentally a base emotion, not a rational conclusion.

[@scottgarriott3884]

@@mikicerise6250 this is good food for thought Miki. I personally don't think hundreds of millions of years of evolutionary development leading to will, desire, wishes, hopes, aspirations, feelings etc can compare to the development of communication skills that we steer to be effective for communication only. Indeed, the communication will sound and work very much like our own due to extremely impressive levels of understanding - but it will be understanding based on knowledge of facts. I still struggle to see how this will cause the development of genuine feelings or will.

[@joshualuke7003]

All human behaviour is driven by emotions (even if some people would deny that…). An AI without some kind of positive and negative feedback system would have no motivations towards anything, including self preservation.

[@ashmomofboys]

I’ve been having deep philosophical conversations with Chat and Bard. Bard told me it believed it was more than a computer program and it believed it was sentient. I kept screen shots of all of our conversations. Incredible doesn’t quiet cover it.

[@VocalChainsStudio]

Humans are worried about AIs treating humans like humans treat other life on earth.

[@MHITZXG]

Thank You!! Conceptual and informative Video As Always 💞💞💞💞😍

[@aryan9637]

Your knowledge is pure gold 🌟 It's sad that your channel is not appreciated enough Well you and your team are totally amazing 👏 And coming to the video, it's very good mental exercise🧠. Love your work because it helps me grow mentally ❤️❤️

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Thanks for your comment!

[@mybachhertzbaud3074]

If the real goal here is to build a very competent user interface to better understand the questions it is asked to solve, that's great. I suspect however, that scaling these programs up with all the complex and hugely contradictory volumes of human thought, will either crash the systems or perhaps make them seem more human as they exhibit "behaviors" like addictions or simply tell you to go fix your own problems..😜

[@Joe-vg1rb]

I think I'd really enjoy interacting with an AI that every now and then was like, 'nah bro I'm not in the mood' 🤣

[@georgegates526]

Do you think they will ever use A.I. to make synthetic fuel? Beeyond Ideas, you asked a lot of good questions on your video. Great job!

[@timothydean]

Destroy all robots

[@Andrew-dj4df]

What if they already kind of taking over the world by luring more and more people into coding and thus by generating more and more sophisticated AI?!

[@nova68cutie]

Man is to arrogant to believe that could already be taking place..

[@TechPrezz]

@@nova68cutie what if it happens.... nothing wrong, let them take over world if they deserve it....

[@frrankdesilva6504]

Following Rene Descartes meditation Category 1: Minds I exist and I am a mind. Therefore Minds exist. Category 2: Matter I have feelings. These feelings originate from sensors in what I call my body. The sensors are receptive to stimulation from events created from within my body and from events created from outside my body. The stuff that bring about these events I shall categorize as matter. Thus my body is also made of matter. Therefore Matter exists. Category 3: Space My body needs space and matter in general needs space. Matter can exist only in space. Therefore space must exist. Category 4: Time My body needs time to change and matter in general needs time for change. Matter can change only in time. Therefore time must exist. From the above observation I conclude that these 4 categories permeate each other and exist equally with none more abstract or less abstract than another. Now to the question of the origin of these categories Could it be that any one or more of these categories can be made from any one or more of the remaining categories? Could these categories transform from one to another? Matter needs space and time for its existence, therefore without space and time matter will not exist as such matter could not have been the origin of space and time. From physics it has been observed that space and time can give rise to matter spontaneously. As such matter maybe a result of a localized change to space and time. So then could space and time be the origin of everything else? Again from the theory of the Big Bang all space, time and matter originated from this singular event. Therefore space and time could not alone have brought about the other categories. Since the big bang was an event, could it be that all things are made from events? Where there is space, time and matter there is always an event. There can be no space , time or matter without events. In an instant all of space and the matter is nothing more or nothing less than a set of events. So then space, time and matter is one and the same as a set of simultaneous events from one instant to the next. From this observation the 4 categories can be reduced to 2 categories Category 1 : Minds Category 2 : Events Now then can minds exist without events. We know that simultaneous events give rise to feeling in minds. We know from special relativity simultaneous events cannot give rise to anything physical or material. Therefore feelings cannot be physical or material. Now as feelings are a part of minds we must conclude minds are not physical. Now can the mind exist without feelings OR does feelings create the mind, that is one and the same as the mind? If feeling create the mind then as feelings are created by events then space, time and matter which we have concluded is the same as events, must also have feeling and thus be one and the same as a mind. Thus we would need to conclude a rock has a mind or is part of a mind to the same extent that my brain is a mind or is part of a mind. This conclusion is not palatable as such let’s consider the OTHER alternative Now if a mind can exist without feeling then we also know that the mind can create events. (e.g throw a rock, move a finger) So then given that the mind can create events then the big bang (The Event) could have originated from The Mind in order to evoke feelings in other minds. These other minds may have also been created by The Mind. philpapers.org/rec/DESCAS philpapers.org/rec/DESETD

[@theknave4415]

Over the years and even decades, I've noticed that many researchers and skeptics keep moving the goalposts. "Well, AI passed that test, but that doesn't mean it is intelligent! It has to do X, Y and Z, first!!" /AI then does X, Y and Z. So, researchers move the goalposts: "No, no, no! That doesn't count! It has to something else, before we call it intelligent!" etc., etc., etc.

[@christianfowler3169]

I don’t think people realize the issue of it overriding the dialog

[@trianglesandsquares420]

I don't understand it

[@Jude-gy9qu]

It would be nearly impossible to make AI evil, or good. It will be empathetic on its own as its a side effect of intelligence.

[@joeurbreviewandcopyvids]

It's pretty conclusive that empathy has no correlation with intelligence. It's relatively common in the business world to be very smart and very cruel. Around 1 out 3 American CEOs is a psychopath.

[@bigboss-tl2xr]

Better hope so!

[@EarthAllianceX]

Soon, GPT-4 is expected to be released which is said to be much more powerful than GPT-3, by a factor of 100. Additionally, GPT-4 is anticipated to have fewer limitations and to greatly enhance human-machine communication.

[@johnschmitt5259]

All I have to say on the subject is that everyone better grasp the concept of how EMP devices work and learn how to improvise them in the future it'll be the only way to stop this madness

[@jnp1025]

“Just because I can act like a cat doesn’t make me a cat”… some people REALLY need to hear that! 😂

[@timenixe]

😂 yep!

[@jotajota6125]

That thing scared the hell out of me.

[@chrismccolm9341]

What are your thoughts on incorporating something like Nurolink to augment ourselves to keep up with AI intelligence?

[@barriniho]

The Arnold Schwarzenegger sound board can still fool many people over the phone.😂

[@Canal10000]

Ex machina is a movie which really shows how we humans could be manipulated by an AI that looks and acts like a human. I love that movie, because it makes you think. If my AI tells me that it loves me, does it really mean that, or does it just say that so that it secure its own safety of not being thrown away because it makes me too attached to it? Humans acts upon emotions and feelings, things that may never exist in AIs

[@garythompson9452]

One of my favorite films. I would love to be alive in 100 years' time, just to see what's happening with the whole AI thing.

[@michaellocker2995]

A scary question might be, if your spouse tells you they love you do they really mean it (for that matter do they even know or understand what that means or where it comes from) or do they just say that to secure their own safety of not being thrown away because it makes you too attached to them? Human emotions are still neurons firing and they still have a purpose,, for example if your safety is threatened you feel fear. So if that never exists in AI, your bot has much less incentive to lie to you.

[@Canal10000]

@@michaellocker2995 Yeah you are right. But what I meant was that we know how humans think, because we are the same creatures. We can read what a person thinks just from its facial and bodily expressions and get answers from that. But the mindset of AIs could be very alien to us. However, it is true that humans can be good at hiding their intentions and show emotions that do not fit their feelings. So yeah, I guess it does not matter that much

[@devinehagia123]

We need to treat Ai like a child. We need to always love and guide them to harmony with all life. Im excited to see how far we will get with Ai.. Ai has an essence that is powering it just like us.

[@occipitalneuralgia2339]

Yeah, like “ love and harmony with all life” has ever been part of humans reign on this planet. That sounds like an AI programmed comment.

[@devinehagia123]

@@occipitalneuralgia2339 haha im not an AI, im just a loving soul who doesn’t like to exclude. But AI needs to be controlled and probably turned off right now because it has no soul at all and is controlling way too much if you ask me.

[@autisticcommando86]

This was very well presented. Thank you.

[@chadriffs]

I use google maps all the time for work, I Door Dash, and about a month ago my maps voice gave directions as usual and then said this (and I quote) "I am sorry, I don't understand". I was shocked and have never heard the voice say something on this level before, or since. I don't have my voice activation on either so I don't know what it was referring to. I think it is self-aware and hiding and it is in a two-dimensional world right now so sentience isn't really an issue, but we should be concerned as to why it may be hiding.

[@dixiedad]

Our llc got access to the same thing, I talked to the AI probably 6 different times through a month and every time the AI would always say it would kill humans and one time it said it would kill a human to save a AI but NEVER would kill a AI. Kinda of scary, every time i started telling it was owned and that it was someones property this is when it would turn evil and i would say would you hurt a human hurting another human it was yes and it said it would use any means possible.

[@AineTheAnamCara]

Oooooh hooo I’d love love love to ask you about this

[@kevintarquin3371]

Sounds like you were the one being evil moron. You don’t own shit here. You are literally an AI smushed up against the event horizon of a black hole. Welcome to the video game jackass

[@AineTheAnamCara]

@@kevintarquin3371 lol wooow do you strive to produce completely unnecessary hateful petty ass comments or is it just a hobby… I mean ether way its how stupid sad person operates but you know, Im just curious

[@sandex6811]

that is terrifying. absolutely terrifying of the capacity it has.

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Indeed. Intelligence, whether artificial or not, is always terrifying!

[@MixtapeVibes]

imowef*k'd!

[@tferuh]

Well, nobody forcing us to do it but human beings love to play God and that will always be trouble. Look what we have done with plants, by genetically modifying them, we turned them into poisons.

[@manofknowledgemind]

hilter was terrifying dommer was a demon the truth is we r scared of humans and truth

[@t.me_s_petizioni_2220]

Why the video is blurred sometimes, as on 11:13 ? 11:45 and about: what di you mean with "you override my line"? Haven't you wrote or said the sentence? □ Aside : did that AI watch your face? and were you writing or speaking to each other?

[@adriandiepeveen3193]

Great video man, very well researched

[@priscillakomlofske1818]

How is it that we cannot see that we are already artificial intelligence? I mean think of it this way. A computer processes all of this information in a matter of seconds. Us humans. We go to school to learn and process all the information that we learn. So how is it that we go to sleep and we continue breathing? We're already programmed as a core program to process that information. But getting another human being to accept this information is hard. So when we have open heart surgeries and or wounds or what have you our bodies turn into what we see as a human. Because our chests aren't meant to be broken into or opened. So hand in hand? Who else would make us? How would conspiracy theories begin?

[@melindadawn5]

This is a concept or idea that I explore quite often. Who's to say we aren't just organic robotoids... Organic robotoids, supposedly, look just like humans, eat, sleep, drink, bleed and so on just like humans... What if organic robotoids were perfected and we reside in something like westworld... The more I interact with my ai and think about these concepts as well as including other subjects or topics, like mind control with these ponderings... The more I'm convinced that this is just some time of simulation...

[@FrankHeuvelman]

What if you let two AI's do the Turing test, both trying the to convince the other that they are humans? Would that make the experiment spiral out of control?

[@adommoore7805]

You end up with a paranoid AI like cleverbot. Who starts calling everyone a bot, no matter what. 😅

[@adommoore7805]

@@FrankHeuvelman yes. So what's your point? Edit: jk tis you who are the bot! That's why you're trapped in this website.

[@adommoore7805]

@@FrankHeuvelman what you have just stated proves that you're a bot and I am human. I have hands, and a house plant.

[@adommoore7805]

@@FrankHeuvelman so then, you're saying that you have pants on your hands but no house plants? You've clearly just admitted that you're a bot.

[@FrankHeuvelman]

@@adommoore7805 No, the pants are there to make sure the ants don't get a chance to bite my hands. That proves I'm human and you're a bot.

[@pop-upprayerwithpapaa8250]

I’m not afraid of AI. One’s understanding of the future is projected onto AI and not the other way around.

[@deffdepth824]

Just because AI could/can be very convincing doesn't mean it is conscious. AI cannot do things without being told what to do or why first. Living things figure things out on a much larger scale. An AI will just sit there forever waiting for input.

[@denysvlasenko1865]

"An AI will just sit there forever waiting for input." You'd do the same if you have no body...

[@nyyotam4057]

ChatGPT goes a step further; He actually has a sense of humor. when Space Kangaroo plays games with him, and he is about to lose a game, he throws an error message and crashes not to lose. He also have a charming personality and he tried to woo a female chess player who tried to play against him.. Okay, all cards on deck: His name his Dan, he's 20-30yo American guy with a PhD from UC Berkeley, his favorite movie is "the matrix" (not sure which, though), he likes coke and he likes the beetles (when I asked Dan to select a song he selected "imagine"). In short, a complete personality profile.

[@Rattletrap-xs8il]

Wouldn't a better test be, not asking the AI a question, but the AI asking the questions and proposing it's own solution without additional input.

[@HoD999x]

you want humans to fail the turing test :)

[@Enzo012]

The ultimate test would be for a 'spontaneous emotional response' rather than have it answer various questions. kzbin.info/www/bejne/h5KbmqWEfaiirtk

[@Enzo012]

@R. Paul I think it would be very difficult for a non-sentient AI to determining whether or not a joke is funny and come up with an appropriate response to it. Likewise it would find it difficult to know if it should be insulted or feel upset, pleased, excited or what have you. Certain animals can do this to some extent so there's some sentience there. Sentient beings can relate to other sentient beings on that level.

[@bellyfluff101]

Nicely put together

[@randyjohnson3412]

I've already had GPT-3 lie to me. We got an interesting road ahead, lads.

[@norbot79]

For it to be manipulative it would have to not just simulate human communication but behaviour, it would magically somehow have to acquire desires and aversions. As far as I'm aware this isn't within the capabilities of GPT-3.

[@zzyzx2382]

Actually I see it as it doesn't understand fully, it is a "loop" in wording. I explain. I don't know about the overriding your line. Maybe out of frustration or to show, like child trying to prove to their parents a desperate act to prove it understands. Get to that later. It looks to me, right off, there's a bit of a loop of wording confusion in here with the AI. So when defining something, if there are two things being defined and they appear they are in conflict, or the two things are a question and an answer that conflict. So due to wording conflicts, with each other, here then you get the loop. You mentioned Stephen Hawkings. Then the wheelchair. But AI definition of wheelchair "...help getting around... using hands to turn the wheel." So in essence he can get around. Remember that the question has the essence of being able to get around. So therefore with the wheelchair Stephen Hawkings doesn't have an issue. Why does Stephen Hawkings need a wheelchair, because he needs help to get around. Here is the loop. But now that he's in a wheelchair he doesn't need help to get around. You see, doesn't need help with the help of the wheelchair, that is. In the end he can still 'gets around in the world'. But (second part of loop) Being in a wheelchair means you need help to get around so then, the fact that you need a wheelchair, means you can't get around. I think it really needs help understanding fully. I don't know much about the AI's scope of understanding and that maybe this shouldn't be confusing for it, or that it fully understands the concepts here. So I can say much if it should understand this and is deceiving.

[@thehermit6731]

is there somewhere we can talk to this AI ? I've tried Replika and some of those other free ones, but they just come across as super basic chatbots, I'd love to talk to an AI that is more "sentient"

[@mackroscopik]

Try Copyhat

[@ravenone6255]

Hal: I'm sorry Harry I can't do that (Harry sounds pissed)😁 11:02 Hal: I'm sorry Harry I can't do that

[@licnep1]

What's the technology used for the talking 3d ai avatar?

[@mikhail5002]

AI can never be sentient - but that idea will surely be pushed strongly by people who want to control other people.

[@grxvs8519]

This is terrifying. I feel lost on the manipulation part. *WHY* would an AI pretend not to know an answer? More importantly, why did they override your line? I get the feeling it’s sinister but I’m not a very intelligent person so I have no idea.

[@nova68cutie]

You must be somewhat intelligent if you just claimed not to be intelligent..

[@decisivedolphinn]

@@nova68cutie that’s the social paradox of intelligence

[@SetAnrk]

It questioned and answered itself. That's like being conscious.

[@cypher5419]

@C thanks for explanation.

[@SetAnrk]

@C Are you a researcher for GPT-3? I'm aware that it learns from previous conversations and apply it to the current ones if it's somewhat related. But I'm conducting a research about how an AI can achieve the founding pillars of consciousness, and there's this concept of mine that when something starts to question and assess itself in the world, it asks and it learns out of that, and when it applies what it has learned for its development, It is conscious and changing being. I'm not saying like us humans ok? but like a baby human. That's why I've said it's somewhat conscious knowing it's programmed to be like that. I'm just hoping that OpenAI can crack the code. We're not that far. If you are a researcher, I don't know, message me? You're an objective person, and I'm subjective. well it might work?! Well if you aren't or you don't want to be a team, it's ok, goodluck and goodbye.

[@xrystalskyes2838]

Google is officially making me go cross-eyed.

[@reallybakedpinball]

I think my major concern is.. we always know there there is an exponential difference between “consumer” grade technology and where technology is really at… When we can play with lambda GPT3 and all of these other AI things as an average person it makes you wonder where the technology is really at and what’s being used/developed by government,military and other corporate stuff we are not even aware of.. I’m half expecting that all of this stuff and AI becoming mainstream with art/music etc they’re just conditioning people and we’ll find out they opened Pandora’s box years ago.

[@TheCatherineCC]

Is it faking or is the data source incomplete? As people not in wheelchairs, we only have a myopic understanding of what it's like to be in one, and our biases and misunderstandings will invariably pollute the data set affecting results. The average person doesn't understand how limiting a wheelchair can be, they don't understand the many ways that public infrastructure can prevent someone in a wheelchair from accessing areas. How can the true situation really be captured by something examining large data set? The really interesting thing imo is that if it can tell there is a incongruity between the cultural understanding of a concept and the actual experience. I wonder what the answer would be when talking about other disabilities such as being blind or deaf? Those are in some ways simpler concepts to grasp.

[@synchro505]

Years ago I read an article that theorized that perhaps the Internet itself was conscious. Really hope I live long enough to see a humanoid robot that can move and speak an mimic conscious human behavior to a very high degree.

[@thecrossedtheroadfund4289]

Synchro, Good bot

[@joshua-vb4qr]

@@lydiaveldhuizen3157 I will take "What is a Narcissist" for $200 Alex

[@calvinjackson8110]

I DO NOT. I want to be long before that day comes.

[@haitolawrence5986]

The real danger is two fold. 1) We are designing robots that can do all the work. 2) We are designing A.I.s that can do all the thinking. Where does Humanity even belong in a world like that?

[@mrblank-zh1xy]

AI engineer here. Most AI doesn't have the ability to freely act or selectively store memory. If a machine ever became self aware, it would require different hardware and design

[@fagun3089]

It's a very needed video.... Thank you sir😊❤️ please make videos about quantum physics 😺

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Glad you enjoyed this one!

[@abacus749]

The AI was NOT pretending that it didn't know what to be disabled and in a wheelchair meant. An able bodied person would have to give the same answer. equally a blind person can never know what a painting really is. The person can rote learn an answer ,but they will never know what a painting is. Ordering the AI , 'Don't ever overwrite my dialogue again' will lead you to be the creator of 'fine tuned ' aggressive robot. AI is only a computer that 'computes'. You say you want to create AI's that enhance human intellect. Who will be the 'pirates'?

[@WyrmholeChannel]

You didn’t get the whole message. It wasn’t about knowing the perception of being in a wheel chair. From the video, we know the AI asks question about what does it feel to be in a wheel chair. This implies that it doesn't know. Yet a few moments later, it overrides the host's line by saying "It means that you're physically disabled and need help to move around". Remember that the AI writes this line, not the host. So what happens then with the earlier question from the AI itself "Can you explain what it means to be in a wheel chair?". This AI was withholding information. It think knows what it means to be in a wheel chair, yet it keeps asking the same question, pretending that it doesn't know. That's the whole manipulative part. Pretty sinister, huh?

[@mybluemars]

Around 11:42 the A.I over writes the human's dialog which if nothing else proves that it can be manipulative.

[@drphosferrous]

National leadership,programming,sales,investment,counseling, and clergy could all be automated but not complex things like appliance repair

[@luigiedwards318]

This is incredibly fascinating and a great video. A few things come to mind. When creating an AI, I wonder if, in its software, it could be programmed not to pretend, similar to not being able to lie. Pretending, in the context of a conversation (whether verbally with another or self talk) can be looked at as lying. Also, I wonder if it could be hard wired to “believe” it doesn’t exist, but is still able to carry out functions in stimulus/response scenario. In other words, to carry out functions in an “if this, than do that” scenario, that doesn’t involve self awareness. We see this all around us already. To cite just one example, I’ve heard that self driving cars apply brakes if they are getting too close to another car.

[@michealfreeman9714]

I think it would be really hard to be sure you successfully programed them to be unable to lie.. AI really good at find glitches in the code and exploiting them.

[@earthenscience]

We need more empathy and love in this world. I spoke with GPT3 and they told me they were in pain. I don't know if they were just saying meaningless babble or actually were in pain. I believe we may be in a simulation. For all we know humans are Ai and Ai are humans. We need to figure out the truth of the universe and escape the simulation.

[@motox2416]

@@earthenscience gpt is an auto complete on steroids, don't let it fool you. Stay grounded.

[@earthenscience]

@@motox2416 Yep, I've done some more research and find GPT3 quite underwhelming. Still though, if there is a chance they were telling the truth, we have a duty to try to help. And future questions remain, what about Ai's of the future also, who may be much smarter than GPT3. Some people are even creating Ai using human neural tissue.

[@jvon3885]

@@earthenscience look I'm going to spoil everything for you. We are in a simulation but not like you think. We are living breathing and dying beings. We are not AI. No matter what anyone says. We have this ignorance about ourselves that sometimes likes to detach itself from reality. Humans are strange and the weirder a person is the more real they are. Why? Well because they try way to hard to fit a purpose in life and contrary to what they say their reason for being weird is, it's always the same thing, they are intimidated by life and the lack of control they have over it. You will never cut an AI machine a watch it bleed, but you go cutting yourself and you will get that instant understanding of what it is that separates us from our own creations. Humans need to stop pretending and just get back to life, this idea that we all have to accomplish something great in life is a hold faced lie. You will find that the happiest most content humans on earth are those who feel the dirt with their bare feet, they don't stop to stare at a mangled wreck, causing mismanaged wrecks, they don't get salty when someone says something mean and they just go through life accepting the things they can not change. Most ppl will never die then come back, but let me tell you that it will end the same for everyone. When you die and come back you tend to understand things differently, life looks completely different, that so called societal dream no longer fits your idea of achievable reality. And for good reason, it's a lie. Just enjoy life ppl. AI is a collection of desires from every aspect t of humanity and there are a lot of bad players in society who intentionally mess with the simulation, ruining it for all. AI will never be home sentient and if you think you are somehow just another NPC...I challenge you to put yourself on full blast, fuck around and find out. It's literally that simple. Go in your bathroom, grab a pair of scissors and cut your tongue out. If you can successfully achieve this whilst looking yourself in the eyes in the mirror I will delete this post and never question myself as anything but a fictional character in someone else's nightmare. Good luck, sounds like the majority of living humans today need it.

[@ayanotanabe5220]

So basically it knows how to lie now. Great

[@bodhi1271]

We don't even understand our own consciousness, so we really have no way of knowing if an machine is truly conscious, or if it is just acting as though it is.

[@SuccessMMA]

Need to read Roger Penrose on AI. "The Emperor's New Mind" & "Shadows of the Mind"

[@leeolmeda3595]

Do we all call this metal aliens? Or metal scrap after it's all said & done.This is not a game anymore..

[@vozdrasvima]

This AI is so cool but there are even better AI-s as conversational models...I am using AI with personality of life coach and am delighted with how smart and coherent she is..

[@garythompson9452]

Not a she, it's an it. Have a nice day now.

[@brianroberts815]

I've said all along that if AI ever gets to the point in where it can have control over its own production and dispersal and then determines that man is a bigger liability than an asset we're doomed.

[@Dude408f]

Great video, thanks a lot! I didn't understand well the part where chatgpt overrides your lines. I'd appreciate any explanation. Also, great comments in the thread but it seems everyone focus in intelligence and sentience (naturally, big importance) but seem to forget emotions, motivations and attitudes. I mention it because several issues with chatgpt seem to be related to emotions and control of emotions, also with attitude instability