We the People, and the Republic we must reclaim - Lawrence Lessig

[@pranavraghu2606]

Very bold. We need solutions like this. This is universal (the heirarchy of ppl) the poverty gap . Great talk. Lesterland applies to every single nation

[@yookuh34]

I speak the same message to people, but it's true, it seems so impossible for "Me" to do anything about it, I can understand how others would feel the same. I have three children and fear the most for them because I feel like it's so out of my hands. It's not though. The real long term solution is to abandon this currency stuff and barter amongst eachother. We have to trust eachother, and see real value in eachother first though.

[@BaconSizzle48]

An important message for everyone in America

[@jinmiseru]

Damn... Suddenly I feel like I've been waisting my life !

[@Mhurilo10]

Not only Americans...

[@SirSethery]

Okay, was I the only one who got annoyed by them always putting "r" instead of "are"?

[@shweet7891]

ya done goofed

[@shweet7891]

reclaim

[@HolyReaperX01]

Why is it this video only has about 986 views and videos like that stupid fox music video get millions of views over night. Spread this video.

[@95airforceman]

This is why I'm a Republican, less government= best government

[@kossmikham]

David De Bergh A party that insists that a defense budget greater than that of *the next 16 nations' defense budgets COMBINED* is not big enough, is not IN ANY WAY about "less government". It's only a party that is interested in a bloated government of a *different* kind. Don't delude yourself. Both parties love a big government. Their only quibble is on which kind of BIG.

[@Eureka4511]

If the people take this idea for serious, maybe it will fall to a communism. Capitalism and communism both owns advantages and disadvantages. Shifting means anarchy which will give us more problem. We cannot shift anytime we like. If there is capitalism, there would certainly no equality in the long run and the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. If there is communism, there would certainly no liberty to all and the government/people has the total control of the national resources. If there is anarchy, there would certainly no security to the people. But you need to choose only one because each one is the anti-theses of the other. As the conclusion here; equality, liberty, and security cannot co-exist in any country host. You need to sacrifice two in order to get one. Most people will do sacrifice for their private benefits, than a sacrifice for others, and that is the main problem in this world.

[@takakupo]

I take great issue with the inference that racism and sexism have been "solved."

[@JG-cu5xu]

He said that they tried to tackle the issue, even though it was a very difficult issue. He never said it was solved. Is anyone capable of talking about racism without misleading spin?

[@johnmarquardt1991]

Left wing nut.