Weasel-Off 4 - Wingtips

[@TheModelGuy]

Nice to see Meng learned some things from the shortfalls in the -18 kits

[@BA-zo3oi]

Great series and excellent comparison between the two kits and how the wing tips are treated. Watching the ZM piece go in I found myself saying "YGBSM"!

[@brettbricker1810]

Thanks for taking the time to do these videos. Its very helpful. I ended up getting the Meng F-4E based on what I've seen so far.

[@ralphford4302]

No contest there agreed. Trying to get a good top and bottom fit while maintaining the 12.5 degree tilt is not something anyone would want to play with - great series really enjoyable

[@tonnywildweasel8138]

Nothing like a Wild Weasel :-)

[@chilidogcats]

It looks like Meng is applying all their experience from their Gundam kits and the old snap fit 1/48 P-51D. There's lots of great engineering in their kit, there are some shortcomings . . .The RWR on the wingtips are correct on the ZM kit. Meng missed it. But I hate having to fix fit issues . . .

[@mobiuspenguin]

Meng be winning

[@stuartshallproductions7409]

Definitely, next to Tamiya, the newer Meng kits are amazing!

[@danwilliams1686]

It's seems that the mung/meng kit is winning overall. I'll take superior fit over details any day of the week.

[@skyhawka4m]

While both kits have downfalls.....neither one blows the other one away, the deal breaker for me overall is the one piece fuselage that MENG offers.....the rest......can be dealt with or replaced.

[@downthethroatmodeling]

Very interesting comparison. Thanks 👍👌