Video describing the role of likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing
Пікірлер: 34
@marcinw46602 жыл бұрын
pure gold - you are the godfather of applied medical statistics
@ln065025 жыл бұрын
I am a medical student and your videos are my go to when I want to brush up or learn about biostatistics and the like. They're so simple and easy to follow. They all make sense. Thank you Dr. Shaneyfelt.
@balthus92652 жыл бұрын
The best video about likelihood ratio I’ve ever seen. Short and straight to the point.
@augustlyon10 жыл бұрын
This is the first time I actually manage to understand this material. Thank you!
@xeebot4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I've read so many websites - this is the first time I clearly understood this.
@alvi783 жыл бұрын
My Godd!! I only graduated 24 years back and finally I get it.
@ciarayoung87504 жыл бұрын
Thanks Terry - very helpful video, explained clearly and simply.
@subhashchandradaga10636 жыл бұрын
Simplified and well-presented.
@taladiv34152 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor for explaining this to us.
@luzlabajos30244 жыл бұрын
Great material! Thank you so much
@humma913 жыл бұрын
Subscribed due to this video. Brilliant and easy.
@RobertoMagnoV3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot from Brazil!!!!!
@deannawennberg339510 жыл бұрын
these videos are very helpful!
@MohamedKandilMD5 жыл бұрын
Thank you, this is really helpful
@tm1972 Жыл бұрын
Unbelievably helpful.
@user-wr9ks3tf4n2 жыл бұрын
fantastic !!!
@pujasinha34214 жыл бұрын
Good one..!!
@rajeshkhanna51619 жыл бұрын
clear.useful
@anwarhussain59624 жыл бұрын
very goog , good job
@nataliadejesus972 Жыл бұрын
Thanks proffessor
@anacosic173 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@merleverwohl6344 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation. Is It possible that the Negative Likeli Hood Ratio is - 1? Or does It have to be >/= 0?
@zuwaina8810 жыл бұрын
Thank you. So if we are asked to plot out the post test, we need to dcide first what is our aim: role in disease (hence, we should use the positive likelyhood ration) or role put ( negative test)? Can"t thank you enough.
@salam79053 жыл бұрын
thank you so much^-^
@hokiehenry8 жыл бұрын
Very nice explanation. In your example of infection I was wondering about using C reactive protein to rule out infection because the CI includes 1. Shouldn't I try to avoid tests that include 1 in the CI?
@lavincius Жыл бұрын
Yes
@andresm.acevedo9590 Жыл бұрын
Where can you find the LRs from the most representative tests used in the clinical setting?
@briant616410 жыл бұрын
For the negative likelihood ratios all the confidence intervals cross one, so none of them should be used to rule out infection
@RobvanMechelen6 жыл бұрын
seems a correct conclusion in my view. Thanks.
@drayubkhan5 жыл бұрын
If as an example the negative likelihood ratio is between - 0.5 to - 1.5 then it does not cross 1.so not necessarily
@user-us3zv1ux5f9 жыл бұрын
Hello there, is the likelihood ratio posttest probability equivalent to positive predictive value?
@UABEBMcourse9 жыл бұрын
Yes assuming the test was positive and you used the positive likelihood ratio
@user-us3zv1ux5f9 жыл бұрын
Terry Shaneyfelt Thank you for the response!
@eligottlieb10 жыл бұрын
So you're saying likelihood+ = P(E | H) / P(E | not H), and likelihood- = P(not E | H) / P(not E | not H)? So it's just a Bayesian update.