What are quasi contracts? (Art. 1157, Civil Code, Nature and Effect of Obligations)

This is for educational purposes. This video aims to simplify the law or provision of law featured in this video so that students will have a better understanding of the law. Situational examples are also discussed in the video to enable the viewer to visualize the intent and meaning of the law.

[@user-xs3jx4ym2w]

So glad I found your videos Atty! 😊 I appreciate you trying to simplify the law and I love your "under 10 mins" discussions. ❤

[@haebds5547]

Thank you very much for your explanation. very explicit👌

[@ma.teresaalcones2825]

Very.comprehensive explanations..thank u atty..

[@kcgemida2909]

Explanations are made simplify and clear. Thank you Atty. this is so helpful among freshmen law student like me who had no back ground of Oblicon subjects in undergrad.

[@mblclassroom]

You're very welcome!

[@hannahtrinidad2414]

Thank you Atty. It helps me a lot to understand the law..❤

[@mblclassroom]

You're welcome 😊

[@florinnzabakira6281]

THE EXPLANATION WAS HELPFUL

[@kairi7287]

I am so thankful that I discovered your channel 😭❤️

[@mblclassroom]

I'm glad!

[@gericomartin8086]

Thank you, Atty for your explanation it helps a lot for me

[@mblclassroom]

Great to know!

[@cyberplanetnike6511]

Very clear Ma'am

[@denzelthegiant9685]

Subscribed. Nakaka hilo sa book aralin hahahha thanks so much

[@bbreadbang2828]

Nice discussion. Hello, atty.! Just wanna ask if the gestor have obligations as well? And if there are, what are those? Thank you!!

[@angellejoymalingin9438]

Hi atty! 😇 thank you so much for sharing this video po. Atty, may I ask a question. This somewhat related to the case of BPI vs. Sarmiento. Regarding the 2 requisites provided by SC 1. There no be pre-existing contractual relationship and 2. That payment was made by mistake. Atty, the situation is an employee unduly received a certain amount and it was reflected on his payroll. The employee being a long time employee of the company did not question such unduly amount thinking that it was just normal. It went for three months until HR informed him that they will deduct the amount the he unduly received in the last three months. The employee agreed to have the deductions being obedient to HR. Atty,the unduly payment must have occured because of this, the employee changed his working days from 6 days to 5 days, thereafter, the HR asked the employee to signed a document to make adjustment for the basic pay then it was submitted and duly signed by the employee, and that was before the 5-day work start. I believe, the employee having confidence and trust to HR never thought of the amount as undue amount. Atty, my main questions are the following po: 1. Since there is an employee-employer relationship were the deductions right? 2. For me the mistake came from the HR , since the employee already signed a document that he shall deducted a certain from his basic pay. But the HR failed to do, it seemed that it was a negligence in their part. Atty, was it negligence and because of that should the Hr be stopped from claiming compensation? 3. Or was it the employees fault for not checking thoroughly. Thank you, Atty. Have a nice day . God bless 😇

[@victorinoclarisseannl.9727]

Good day, Atty. How about Civil Liability Arising From Crimes or Delicts? Pls do video and explanation! Thank you!

[@pelagioespinosa4439]

Very Nice thanks..

[@mblclassroom]

My pleasure!

[@ca8204]

Thank you.

[@mblclassroom]

You're welcome!

[@rosaliepalima548]

Thank you❤

[@grAvYGraVyy]

Can you explain po Article 2158?

[@mblclassroom]

I will cover that Article soon. Thank you for dropping by!