What Did Jesus And The Bible Say About Self Defense And Guns? Luke

[@mikejones7990]

Swords were military-grade weapons back then. Keep that in mind.

[@latenttweet]

A correctly sharpened sword and martial art skill to use it would be more powerful with a crown of people attacking you (12 on one) then a Glock 9mm with 12 rounds. Statistically you will not survive even a knife fight let alone your marrow getting cut off completely

[@jvlp2046]

As a True Christian who worshipped God in Spirit and in Truth... I had placed my entire 100% TRUST through FAITH in Christ Jesus (Son of God) with my Family and my Personal Protection, "THY (God) WILL BE DONE." We can die any moment, any time, without Sickness or any Big Guns coming on the doorsteps... "All men DIE, but not all Men really LIVED." However, when it comes to our NATIONAL SECURITY of the Free State/Nation (USA)... it is our DUTY to KEEP and BEAR ARMS to defend the Annihilation (Existence) of the Free State/Nation... this is BEYOND Private Self-Defense... the Original INTENTION of 2A drafted by James Madison... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

[@thegenius7567]

Somebody told me years ago that if you are a Christian you are not supposed to have a firearm, when I told him to read Luke chapter 22 first 35 his mouth dropped even Jesus said it was okay to have a weapon

[@rodolfo5651]

no he didnt

[@SmithMrCorona]

This is utter bullshit.

[@vickyandersen8660]

@@SmithMrCorona and so is your language 😬🙊

[@XD-inator]

There’s nothing wrong with possessing firearms. What’s wrong is using them on the offensive. Kind of like purposely plowing into a large crowd of ppl with a vehicle. Does that make it a sin to have a car? No.

[@therealityexposer]

Not just okay, but of the utmost importance.

[@jvlp2046]

Luke 22:36... "He (anyone) who has NO SWORD (no God's Word from their Hearts and Minds), must SELL (give up) their CLOAK/GARMENT (their Pride/Status/Stature in life) and BUY (humbly acquired the knowledge and righteousness ) ONE (of God/I AM)." The Spiritual message in this passage is... "Anyone who has No God's Word from their Hearts and Minds must give up their PRIDE, STATUS, and STATURE in life to humbly have/to acquire the knowledge and righteousness of God"... Seek ye first the Kingdom and Righteousness of God, and all shall/will be added unto you." (ref. Matt, 6:33)... "Do not be FEAR Men who can KILL only the Body (flesh), bur FEAR God who can destroy both the Body (flesh) and Soul/Spirit in Hell... (ref. Matt. 10:28)... Praise be to God in Christ... Amen...

[@kevinflem2036]

It is a literal swords that Jesus told the 12 Disciple to buy for self defense.

[@jvlp2046]

@@kevinflem2036 Christ Jesus spoke SPIRITUAL matters in His teachings... He used Parables and Metaphors/Symbolism/figuratively... Christ's 1st coming does not teach Physical VIOLENCE or SELF DEFENSE... He taught that God is your PROTECTOR... Christ's 2nd coming will be RETRIBUTION (Justice), and not Vengence, for God said, "Vengence is Mine"... (ref. Romans 12:19)... Amen.

[@GogglesOstrich]

I suggest using these verses to show that we are not to be using weapons to hurt people: Matthew 26:52 ESV Then Jesus said to him, "Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword. Luke 22:49-51 ESV And when those who were around him saw what would follow, they said, "Lord, shall we strike with the sword?" [50] And one of them struck the servant of the high priest and cut off his right ear. [51] But Jesus said, "No more of this!" And he touched his ear and healed him. ❤✝️

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

@GogglesOstrich you fail to mention how Peter attacked unprovoked instead of self defense.

[@jvlp2046]

@@Haaaderkaderka6573 What did Christ say to Peter, "Put away your (literal) Sword back to its place... "People who LIVE by the (Literal) Sword will die by the (literal) Sword"... (ref. Matt. 26:52)... Praise be to God in Christ... Amen.

[@jvlp2046]

I stand firmly and believe to the ABSOLUTE TRUTH, that the "PRIVATE USE of Self-Defense" was not stated, stipulated, and written down in the 2A drafted by James Madison and ratified in 1791 A.D. ... Therefore, it was for the SECURITY of the Free State (Nation) through a well-regulated PEOPLE with Military Training called MILITIA, have the RIGHT to keep and bear ARMS that shall not be infringed was the Original INTENTION of the 2A... otherwise, everybody is entitled with their own personal opinionated interpretation... Facts and Truth of the Matters... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen...

[@jvlp2046]

James Madison drafted the 2A, and not John Adams... If James Madison believed that the MILITIA's Weaponry (Arms) may also be used for PRIVATE SELF-DEFENSE, he should have added those words when he drafted the 2A... But that Private Self-Defense was not the ORIGINAL INTENTION of the 2A, nor it was written down... the Weaponries were provided by the Free State for FREE, and not SOLD to the Militia for Private Self-Defense... Facts and Truth of the Matters... Historically, Rhetorically, and Logically speaking...

[@pastorstan3720]

Making a living by the sword is different than being a good steward and protecting what God has entrusted to me, my family. Would you really stand by and let those you loved be destroyed when you had the means to stop them? When Jesus walked the earth did not carry a gun because he was and is God. Are you also quick to condemn others who carry a gun for the defense of others like law enforcement and the military? Jesus does indeed carry a sword in heaven as it is written, 11 "Then I saw heaven opened, and a white horse was standing there. Its rider was named Faithful and True, for he judges fairly and wages a righteous war. 12 His eyes were like flames of fire, and on his head were many crowns. A name was written on him that no one understood except himself. 13 He wore a robe dipped in blood, and his title was the Word of God. 14 The armies of heaven, dressed in the finest of pure white linen, followed him on white horses. 15 From his mouth came a sharp sword to strike down the nations. He will rule them with an iron rod. He will release the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty, like juice flowing from a winepress. 16 On his robe at his thigh was written this title: King of all kings and Lord of all lords," (Rev. 19:11-16).

[@timothym2241]

If that was what Jesus meant by living by the sword, why did he rebuke Peter with those words for using his sword?

[@TonyQuinn-Art]

@@timothym2241 I think it was because Jesus was giving himself up willingly to be crucified and Peter was trying to stop that happening. He'd already told Peter it was going to happen and even rebooked him saying the devil was speaking through him.

[@jvlp2046]

St. Paul said, "DO NOT GO BEYOND/EXCEED WHAT IS WRITTEN." (ref. 1 Corin. 4:6) which is also applicable in the 2A... Praise be to God in Christ... Amen.

[@pastorstan3720]

Individually Jesus tells the disciples in Luke 22:36 “But now,” he said, “take your money and a traveler’s bag. And if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!" Jesus is referring to the future. When the disciples tell Him they have two swords, they mean in the present to which Jesus replies, 38 “That’s enough," because they would not need to use them in their present context.

[@-izziestudios-1655]

Amen 🙏

[@Boo7X77]

Will you make a video about the only time his desicples used their swords? Hint it's Matthew 26:52. Probably not.

[@vmorn85]

Here is more on this subject that defends the argument

[@vmorn85]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/roezk2CYZdakd9Esi=mGP7dQERVA3KAdPr

[@stanthompson5232]

One of challenges of the Christian life is not being judgemental of those who have differing interpretations of Scripture. It is easy to make arguments personal and attack the person instead of having to do the work involved with actually interpreting Jesus' words.

[@misterwakeupcall]

I agree. "He who writes interprets", that is a Maxim of Law; wherefore if the Bible says "The Word" means this, then that's what it means, not what you think it means, or hope it means. There is only one interpretation of scripture, and that is one according to exact definition from the Bible. Awareness of the "Symbolical Language of Scripture" is paramount to proper and accurate interpretation; you should read the Doc. in the following link, lest ye become even more confounded than thou art: drive.google.com/file/d/1kayKp1vDFf9cA8ZvAC0PKKs8i80420h6/view?usp=sharing

[@dude9318]

I dont know will God understand if you do self defence i think God and Jesus will understand sometimes you need to do self defence but mostly not.

[@antccantc5594]

Why were there only 2 swords for 12 people?

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

I invite you to visit our KZbin channel to watch our video on this Scripture called: "Two Swords is Enough", where we use Scripture to provide the meaning. Blessings!

[@milleniallgt9715]

@@antccantc5594 if we don’t need a sword then why does Gods people need an army then? If we don’t need a sword or gun to defend ourselves then we don’t need an army right? Israel shouldn’t have an army then?? You know how stupid that sounds. We still live in a fallen world where evil doesn’t sleep and can happen to anyone. Idk about you but if evil tries to kill me or my family, I will defend my life and family with my gun in Jesus name.

[@RochelleRoseGoes]

It is okay for me to defend myself and my marriage thank you Jesus

[@nicktorea4017]

It's fine to defend yourself and your family any Christian that would standby and watch his family being killed is an idiot.

[@BlackDocP]

Huh? Mary stood by and watched her son be killed...

[@fredarroyo7429]

Jesus said dont seek to keep his life they will lose it

[@nicktorea4017]

@@BlackDocP not everyone's son is going to give up his life for the sins of the world there's a big difference to what I was saying and what you're inferring.

[@nicktorea4017]

@@fredarroyo7429 the context you've stated doesn't apply to what I was inferencing.

[@fredarroyo7429]

@@nicktorea4017 absolutely you seek to keep your life through self defense

[@jvlp2046]

The "PRIVATE USE of Self-Defense" must be CLEARLY seen, stated, stipulated, and written down in the 2A, or else everybody has their own OPINIONATED INTERPRETATIONS including Judges or those in Authority... Facts and Truth of the Matters...

[@jvlp2046]

The MAIN PURPOSE why Mankind created the WEAPONRY (Guns, Bombs, Warplanes, Missiles, Warships, etc.) was not to RESTRAIN (stop/hold back/refrain) but to ANNIHILATE and DOMINATE... There were many invented DEVICES or FACILITIES to RESTAIN (refrain/hold back/stop) a person or a group of people w/o the purpose of ANNIHILATION and DOMINATION... for example, SEAT BELTS, HANDCUFFS, STRAIGHT JACKETS, SHACKLES, CHAINS, ROPES, BARBED WIRES, JAILHOUSES, PRISON & REHABILITATION INSTITUTIONS, etc. ... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

[@Griza22]

This crossed my mind as sat here tonight and glad I found this video. Thank you. I have a .38 iwb just in case.

[@philliprobinson7724]

Hi. Pastor Stan's is a "one scripture" analysis. Not mentioned is the sermon on the mount where Jesus says to "submit to evil and turn the other cheek for a second attack" (Matt 5:39-48). Submit to those who would abuse you so you can be better than the publicans who only love those who love them. (Matt 5:10) has us accepting persecution to gain the kingdom of heaven, not defending ourselves. Jesus' final word on the subject was to tell Peter," He who lives by the sword shall die by the sword" (Matt 26:52), something Pastor Stan obviously doesn't believe applies to himself, despite him serving the gun lobby better than he does the Bible. Finally, (2Tim 3:16) says that all scriptures must be considered, not just one out of context. Cheers, P.R.

[@alnett22]

Pastor is there anyway you can get me some verses that state that We Men husbands have the right to protect our family defend our family?

[@jvlp2046]

Christ also said, "Do not fear Men who can kill only the (Literal Physical) Body, but fear God/YHWH who can kill both Body and Soul/Spirit in Hell." (ref. Matt. 10:28)... TRUST GOD... "An Eye for an Eye, and A Tooth for a Tooth," was from the O.T. of God to Israel, and not from the N.T. of God through His Son, Christ Jesus... The Self-Defence taught by Christ Jesus to his followers is to run, hide, evade, and repulse in any way we can without using weapons or violence to hurt nobody to escape danger, and if you are cornered (nowhere to hide), let "God's WILL be Done."... Just like Christ, evaded the Jewish Authority from the Plot of killing or harming Him... Christ Jesus never used WEAPONRY to defend and protect Himself, for Christ truly TRUST His Father God/YHWH... "DO YOUR BEST (to stay safe/alive w/o violence or vengeance but seek fair justice/retribution), AND GOD WILL DO THE REST." Christ Jesus said, "Not even a hair from our head will perish without God knowing it." (ref. Luke 21:18)... Not a single SPARROW will fall down without God knowing it." (ref. Matt. 19:29)... Take Note: Ask yourself HONESTLY from your Heart... If you are a Christian where does your TRUST lie (depend) most, to God/YHWH or to WEAPONRY? God only allowed the use of WEAPONRY to defend from ANNIHILATION of the existence of a Nation/Country or God's People, not individual self-defense... WAR of the Nation is a bigger/wider issue, it involves the Entire Human Race... Not fighting for your OWNSELF but for the SURVIVAL OF OTHERS... Christ said, "WHATEVER YOU DO TO THE LEAST OF YOUR NEIGHBORS (Foes alike) YOU ARE DOING UNTO ME." (ref. Matt. 25:40)... We Defend OTHERS, and let OTHERS defend us in WAR... If NOBODY will defend us, let God be that one... if we truly TRUST through FAITH in God... Facts and Truth, Biblically and Logically speaking... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

[@jvlp2046]

Some are neglecting the FACT that the 2A was drafted by James Madison and not by John Adams... The REAL and TRUE ORIGINAL INTENTION of 2A was for NATIONAL SECURITY of the Free State through a well-regulated PEOPLE with Military Training called MILITIA... and not for PRIVATE Self-Defense, otherwise, James Madison should have CLEARLY written it down... These PEOPLE with Military Training (MILITIA) have the RIGHT to keep and bear ARMS that shall not be infringed... not ORDINARY PEOPLE... The Government gave REMUNERATION/SALARY with TIME DURATION for these such PEOPLE to do their SERVICE to the FREE STATE... We are entitled to our OWN OPINIONS and INTERPRETATIONS (including John Adams), but we are not entitled to the REAL TRUTH and ORIGINAL INTENTION of James Madison who drafted the 2A that was ratified in 1791 A.D. Facts and Truth of the Matters, Historically and Logically speaking...

[@winolowardichelli2850]

Southern accent + talking about guns= i already know it is going to be a pro gun video. Lmaoo

[@ransbarger]

The bible can be used to justify just about anything.

[@ChrisPBacon1434]

@@ransbarger skill issue

[@joedouche3818]

They use the bible to mask their murderous tendencies, these folks love to twist the Bible around, my question to them is WHEN DID JESUS EVER USE A WEAPON AGAINST HIS ENEMIES? Plus by the scripture he just read, Jesus says you only need 2! Lol

[@sidthesquidh]

Duh-huh, southern man go brrrrrrrr

[@Tacocasaking]

@@ransbarger no, not really. Try reading it and you l’ll understand there’s a lot it dues not justify.

[@davidmartynyuk2437]

I would disagree. I think this was taken out of context. The next verses says verse 37 “For the time has come for this prophecy about me to be fulfilled: ‘He was counted among the rebels.” The reason he told them to buy swords was for the prophesy said about him to come to pass. “counted with the rebels” Also in verse 38 the disciples ask Jesus are 2 swords enough? And Jesus answers yes. If Jesus was concerned about self defense he would tell them to get more sword because 2 swords would be not nearly enough to defend against the crowd that came to take Jesus that night. But the reason Jesus said to bring the swords was for the prophecy about him from the Old Testament to come true. Lastly Matthew 26:52 Says… Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword." This from another gospel that writes about that scene and Jesus clearly says who takes up a sword shall die from it. So that would be a contradiction to buying a sword to defend yourself. Jesus wanted them to make Old Testament scripture happen about him.

[@pedrof676]

Verse 38 is about how armed they should be to avoid Jesus captures, verse 36 is about how armed they should be to support the coming days. Armed on 36 might not be literal, an metaphor of resilience for the hard days knocking the door.

[@rich2209]

Living by the sword means your life revolves around your gain from it or your livelihood. Dont you think?

[@WyldeCoyote223]

Are you suggesting that anyone who owns a sword/firearm shall die from it? Because half of American citizens would die through this logic. Let alone all Police, military, guards etc..

[@alexmora8841]

Finally…. Someone with the gall to READ THE BIBLE IN ITS FULL CONTEXT! THANK YOU BROTHER

[@rickycowan6969]

What if you have a neighbor that doesn't believe in the bible... should I protect them also? I'm a Christian, but my neighbor is not, but he's got kids that I would defend as my own. My "sword" is locked and loaded. I pray that I never have to use it against a human being. I prefer to use it for getting food. I'm asking this out of true concern. Should I defend people other than my family?

[@craigacook8360]

This passages is not about the second amendment please read the whole passage

[@politicjunkee]

@@craigacook8360 he never mentioned the 2nd, you did.

[@aleisterbroley900]

Love your neighbor as yourself. Doesn't say "love your Christian neighbor as yourself". When you engage in self-defense, you put your life on the line. Anything can happen, and even an unarmed individual can turn the tables and end up with your weapon... "Greater love hath no man..." Just my personal interpretation, I'm no priest or theologian. If we are called to be martyrs, that's another story. But refusing to defend yourself leaves your family, and anyone else depending on you for protection, at the mercy of those who will do them harm.

[@coachsixstring]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXSrp4xpiaeKmsU

[@davem3325]

THE BLIEBULL SAYS "KILL ALL NON BELIEVERS" - EVEN IF THEY ARE YOUR OWN CHILDREN - LEARN YOU BIBLE PROPERLY!

[@hotel2105]

Nicee answer. Thank for this. I finally get it.

[@pastorstan3720]

Understanding is a good thing. Pastor Stan

[@jvlp2046]

The word "PEOPLE" that was written in the Operative Clause of the 2A... Who were they?... Who were the PEOPLE entitled with the RIGHT to keep and bear ARMS, shall not be infringed?... Not all PEOPLE (Civilian-Citizen or Non-Citizen) were entitled... it was stipulated in the Prefatory Claus who were those PEOPLE... those PEOPLE were with a well-regulated Military Training called MILITIA... they were not ordinary Civilians (People)...

[@Colehiggy]

This is so good thanks

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

For a more biblical understanding of this story check out the video on our channel called: "Two Swords is Enough", where we use Scripture in proper context to explain the meaning. Blessings!

[@dominickaugustus7395]

i know it is kinda randomly asking but does anybody know a good place to watch new movies online ?

[@jabarijabari6658]

@Dominick Augustus i watch on FlixZone. You can find it on google =)

[@jaxxonvivaan5249]

@Dominick Augustus i would suggest flixzone. Just search on google for it =)

[@paultumelo7321]

Acts 7v54 till 60, Stephen was stone but he never fought back, What was done to Christ Jesus will also happen to us. We are living in the wicked world, Revelation 12v12 Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.

[@TonyQuinn-Art]

This is a topic that I have pondered and gone back and firth a bit with. The bible also says things like love always protects and God doesn't like cowards. I think it's one thing to go out "living by the sword" trying to conquer other nations etc but quite another to use deadly force as a last resort in self defence. When it comes to the army or police force I wonder about the verse regarding taking oaths.

[@jvlp2046]

St. Paul said, "Each Citizen of their Country must "SUBMIT" under the Authority of their own Government Rules, Laws, and Regulations." (ref. Romans 13:1)... Did God teach "EQUALITY/BALANCE in/of Power" between Government and People, between Parents and Children, between Employer and Employee, between Teacher and Pupil/Student, etc."... NOPE... but Humble SUBMISSION... Christ said, "MY FATHER (God) is GREATER than I"... (ref. John 14:28)... The Father (God), the Son (Word/Christ Jesus), and the Holy Spirit are UNITED AS ONE... but UNITY does not mean EQUALITY... Facts and Truth of the Matters, Biblically and Logically speaking... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

[@kndvds1492]

And He said to them, "But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one. Luke 22:36

[@CP-qn1mn]

Can you cite a verse in the bible where the Apostles engaged in some combat with those swords. By the way what happened to all the Apostles at the end of their life.

[@kndvds1492]

@@CP-qn1mn I'm sure there were times they used them, but Jesus knew having the weapons would deter bandits, and thieves from attempting to steal, kill, or destroy them. Jesus loved everyone, and knew he could protect the disciples, but wanted to protect the thieves and bandits so he used the disciples weapons as an incentive for the would be attackers to decide to not attack them. The answer to your other question was answered by God " To be absent from the flesh is to be present with the Lord". Everyone passes on. Born once...die twice. Borne twice...die once.

[@meptune]

@@kndvds1492 " I'm sure there were times they used them". No you are not because there is literally no indication that they ever did. No indication that they all even followed that order. No suggestion they ever killed or threatened anyone. None. Nada. You're imagining things that were not written, stated, or otherwise documented. This verse is not a license to kill, Jesus never passed those out.

[@kndvds1492]

@@meptune Not only do you have no revelation on this, you haven't even prayed. You are letting a false assumption dictate to your mind rather than letting the spirit speak to your heart.

[@meptune]

@@kndvds1492 How on Earth do you know whether I've prayed or not? What a screwball.

[@unseenadventures8130]

Try sir I have been trying to follow the word of the lord and put my life on a different path

[@jvlp2046]

NOPE, the "Bill of Rights" was not given by God Almighty Himself to mankind, however, the Founding Fathers often referred to or claimed that these RIGHTS were "God-given or Unalienable Rights" as seen in the Declaration of Independence... Biblically speaking, only God has ALL the RIGHTS ... WHY?... Man maybe here today but gone tomorrow by God's discretion... God CREATED and OWNS Everything... Mankind can not BOAST to God about their BILL OF RIGHT that God never gave to them but the Founding Fathers claimed to be God-given/Unalienable Rights... that was the Founding Fathers OPINION only, Not FACTS and TRUTH... Christ Jesus said, "GIVE/RENDER to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and GIVE/RENDER to God what belongs to God." (ref. Matt. 22:21 / Mark 12:17)... The Bible (Word of God) never spoke about God giving Mankind the "BILL OF RIGHTS" such as the 2A and others... Non-Biblical... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

[@julliannwinston5308]

Who he live by the sword, die by the sword. Mean that's this who lives by violence, dies by violence Who was killed by the sword in the Bible? Saul Therefore Saul took a sword, and fell upon it. [5] And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise upon his sword, and died with him. [6] So Saul died, and his three sons, and his armourbearer, and all his men, that same day together

[@pastorstan3720]

The point is, Jesus' followers do not live by the sword or violence, they simply protect their family. So you have greatly erred.

[@mitchconner6831]

@@pastorstan3720agreed. I believe many of these people trying to rebuke you are just trying to use scripture to justify their own pacifist beliefs.

[@danielverhulst1378]

The sword (v. 36) is not to be understood literally (compare vv. 49-51), but refers to the living word of God in the battle against sin (Eph 6:17; Heb 4:12). St. Ambrose adds an additional meaning: that giving up one’s garment and buying a sword refers to surrendering the body to the sword of martyrdom. Because the disciples were thinking of swords literally, Jesus abruptly ends the discussion with the words, “It is enough,” or better translated, “Enough of this!” (see Dt 3:26; Mk 14:41).

[@mitchconner6831]

No, Jesus meant it literally lol

[@danielverhulst1378]

Are you saying that your authority of interpretation from Scripture is higher than the Church?

[@kevinflem2036]

Jesus meant a literal real sword for the 12 disciples to buy for self defense .

[@krismyers3995]

This is a topic that I've always wondered since I became a Christian. I wonder if it applies when persecuters get violent. Should we stand and fight or allow ourselves to be persecuted in the End Times. If I'm alive when this happens.

[@pastorstan3720]

Good question, what do you think?

[@leonvieira3877]

@@krismyers3995 I am not going to delve into the discussion above, but as to losing your salvation. One simply cannot lose their salvation if they are a born again believer in Christ, because it is not by our works that we are saved but entirely by his.

[@snakeslayer831]

Should I protect someone who doesnt belivee in self defence or leave them to the element?

[@justingineris5566]

Blessings.

[@jvlp2046]

We, the True Christians are not cowards, on the contrary, we are more courageous (braver) to put our Private Self-Defense TRUST of Protection from the HANDS of God and not through the WEAPONRY (Arms) of Men by most people like you do... However, if for the National Security of the Free State/Nation... True Christians are OBLIGATED to do their Duty to defend the Country as Christ said, "SUBMIT yourself under the Authority of the Government." (ref. Romans 13:1-7 / 1 Peter 2:11-25)... Praise be to God in Christ... Amen

[@CrystalChiEuphoricGardens]

You have the right to protect your life at all cost from someone who seeks to do harm just like in the Bible they were many wars and bloodshed to protect the innocent If not there would be no good ones walking around for the evil would have killed all the innocent if they could’ve

[@Mogee820]

In the Bible god took care of his people with miracles sign an wonders. Not with a swords

[@CrystalChiEuphoricGardens]

@@Mogee820 hmm All throughout the Bible they were wars bloodshed swords just look at the old testament

[@magnushartman5661]

True, Jesus does tell them to get two swords. However, later after Peter cut the servants ear off Jesus said “put up thy sword, for all to take up the sword must perish with the sword”. I think it’s possible the displayed swords caused the mob to back off somewhat from killing Jesus on the spot, but I think it was also a teaching moment for us as believers to not be aggressive toward others. John had his head cut off in prison and Jesus let it happen. With one word he could have turned there swords into feathers who killed him. The question really is “what would Jesus do?” 1Peter 2:23

[@jvlp2046]

Peter, defended Christ Jesus through VIOLENCE by harming others with weaponry... By Christ's Standards, Christians must defend others without VIOLENCE through WEAPONRY or CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE... EVILNESS (Violence) can not be justified by doing EVILNESS (Violence), but only through GOODNESS (Peace/Non-Violence)... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

@jvlp2046 so by that standard we should have fought 1940s Germany with words and love? Yeah, I definitely think we would have won that war and all those millions of jews and Christians would still be alive today. Goliath would have surrendered to David instead of killing him. All of Israel's enemies would have bowed down to Joshua and not slain the Israelites. Nobody would have starved to death and everyone would have lived happily ever after... ☺️... or reality.... "Psalm 82:3-4. Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked." ..... Amen ❤️Which is what we actually did in WW2 and what actually happened for David and Johua and millions of other

[@jvlp2046]

@@Haaaderkaderka6573 WAR/BATTLE of the Nations are not SELF-DEFENSE (Individual/Private Security)... The Government of the Nation/Country sent a huge/large number of MILITIA (Military Civilians) as a Group/Unit to FIGHT through WEAPONRY against ANNIHILATION (their Nation's existence). Biblically and Historically, God allowed Israel to use WAR WEAPONRY during the Invasion of their ENEMIES... But during Peacetime (NO WARS), they were prohibited WAR WEAPONRY (Swords, Spears, Bow/Arrows, etc.), except for Kitchen knives and agricultural tools... Only in the USA, wherein the PEOPLE are allowed to carry FIREARMS (Battle Weaponry) during Peacetime (No WARS)... But historically, the Founding Fathers allowed only the "MILITIA" and not the CIVILIANS to carry War Weaponry... A MILITIA is a recruited PEOPLE (Citizens or Non-Citizens, or Mercenaries) with remuneration, trained as a Military Armed Forces of the Country to Defend (fight) against their Enemies... At that time, the 13 Colonies have not established the POLICE Forces yet, most especially during Peacetime... It was clearly stipulated in the ORIGINAL Amendment signed by the ForeFathers of America... "A well-regulated MILITIA (PEOPLE trained in Combat/War), being necessary for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE (not security of oneself), the RIGHT of the PEOPLE (Militia) to keep and bear ARMS, shall not be infringed." QUESTION:... WHY were the PEOPLE (Militia) given the RIGHT to keep and bear ARMS that shall not be infringed?... clearly stated in the 2A, for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE (Nation)... not for the Security of their FAMILY or Loved Ones or for their Ownself (Self-Defense)... How do we know that the word PEOPLE means MILITIA?... the Founding Fathers used the punctuation mark "COMMA" (",") instead of the Conjunction word "AND."... Which means a STATEMENT (Sentence) composed of 2 CLAUSES separated by commas, namely: the PREFATORY and OPERATIVE Clauses... PREFATORY Clause: an Independent Clause that can stand alone, that can be ended with the punctuation mark "PERIOD" (".") OPERATIVE Clause: a Dependent Clause that can not stand alone without the Prefatory Clause, separated by "COMMA" (",") Let us Analyze the 2 Clauses separately (independently end in period mark)... PREFATORY Clause: ... "A well-regulated MILITIA (subject), being necessary for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE." What is the purpose of a well-regulated MILITIA?... answer... being necessary for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE. (the purpose was served) OPERATIVE Clause: ... "The Right of the PEOPLE (subject) to keep and bear ARMS, shall not be infringed." What is the purpose of the Right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear ARMS that shall not be infringed?... No Answer, which means the statement can not stand alone without the Prefatory Clause attached to it)... This was a BRILLIANT (Wise) Statement coming from the FOREFATHERS of this Nation... In conclusion, the Main PURPOSE of the ratification of the 2A in 1791 A.D. was to have a Well-Regulated MILITIA (recruited PEOPLE with remuneration to be trained in Military Armed Forces) being necessary for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE (Nation/country)... SELF-DEFENSE or PRIVATE USES / PURPOSES was not written in the 2A... Militia's WEAPONRY is for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE... Facts and Truth of the Matter, Biblically, Historically and Logically speaking...

[@jvlp2046]

@@Haaaderkaderka6573 2A was not ratified in 1791 A.D. for the purpose of Self-Defense or PRIVATE use of weaponry either Defensive or Offensive way... but for the purpose of PUBLIC use of Weaponry either Defensive or Offensive way for the Security of the Free State/Nation. The use of PUBLIC weaponry for the security of the Free State is FREE, the People (Militia) need not buy them, it is provided by the Government... while the use of PRIVATE weaponry for Self-Defense is for SALE because PEOPLE bought them for their own PRIVATE Protection... Facts and Truth of the Matters...

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

@jvlp2046 Wrong, hahaha wow. Completely wrong about the second amendment by a LONG SHOT. Secondly, that's a country's law and not God's law. So what's your angel? Clearly, you spread false knowledge of the word and don't even know how the constitution works nor do you understand how the actual world works. I really hope nobody takes your incorrect use of scripture seriously. You really need to stop what you're doing. It's very very bad. Unless you're a Satanist, in which case, keep going.... but I really think you should know God wins in the end. REVELATION 20:7-10... Amen ❤️

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

Nobody listen to jvlp2046. They're probably a Satanist... either way, they clearly manipulate the word and put out false information.

[@Mogee820]

God trying to show them, that you won’t need it if go buy it. Because thy word is the sword. Don’t pay evil with evil.

[@HomeCarryAHandgun45GAP]

God gave his people the right of self-defense. I believed Jesus this time is talking of material or physical sword, coz obviously we can’t buy spiritual sword. Sword & gun are made of the same material like metal. It’s just different shape. We have to respect nature that God created. Specially if It will use for good things. You know what will happen to you, if you curse someone or something.

[@craigacook8360]

This passage have nothing to do with the second amendment. Stop misinterpreting scripture

[@pastorstan3720]

Your right. It doesn't have anything to do with the first amendment because we're discussing the second amendment.

[@craigacook8360]

forgive me the second amendment and you are wrong with the passage

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

For a more biblical understanding of this story check out the video on our channel called: "Two Swords is Enough", where we use Scripture in proper context to explain the meaning. Blessings!

[@jcaustin1968]

Sorry, you missed the whole point of the story. Let’s just get to the answer of the question. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Peter pulled out his sword and Jesus stopped it quick and rebuked Peter, “all who draw the sword will die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52). If you use violent, forceful, or underhanded methods against other people, you can expect those same methods to be used against you.

[@rich2209]

Living by the sword means your livelihood as in your life revolves around your weapon and hpw you gaik from it

[@adriansalas8424]

No I think you missed the point. 1st of all the reason Jesus told Peter to put his sword back, is because he was interfering with Jehovah's will. 2nd Matthew 26:52 has to do with a life of violence and aggression, taking vengeance into one's own hand, will end by violence, aggression. God knows your intentions and the difference of self defense and murder. Luke 22:36 Exodus 22:2-3 Luke18:3 Psalm 144:1 1Timothy5:8 Luke11:21

[@mitchconner6831]

@@adriansalas8424agreed

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

@@adriansalas8424 exactly 💯

[@jvlp2046]

In conclusion, the Main PURPOSE of the ratification of the 2A in 1791 A.D. was to have a Well-Regulated MILITIA (recruited PEOPLE with remuneration to be trained in Military Armed Forces) being necessary for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE (Nation/country)... SELF-DEFENSE or PRIVATE USES / PURPOSES was not written in the 2A... Militia's WEAPONRY is for the SECURITY of the FREE STATE... Facts and Truth of the Matter, Biblically, Historically and Logically speaking...

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

No, that's completely and utterly incorrect. The right to bear arms was specially put in there for a militia and self defense. John Adams: "Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion and in private self defense. -- A defense of the US Constitutions of the Government of the United States 1787-1788 🤭 you've been wrong an awful lot in this comment section haven't you. 😉

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

@jvlp2046 and weren't you just talking about how it's wrong to use weapons and violence against anyone else 🤔 hypocritical don't ya think? Satan boi.

[@jvlp2046]

@@Haaaderkaderka6573 James Madison drafted the 2A, and not John Adams... If James Madison believed that the MILITIA's Weaponry (Arms) may also be used for PRIVATE SELF-DEFENSE, he should have added those words when he drafted the 2A... But that Private Self-Defense was not the ORIGINAL INTENTION of the 2A, nor it was written down... the Weaponries were provided by the Free State for FREE, and not SOLD to the Militia for Private Self-Defense... Facts and Truth of the Matters... Historically, Rhetorically, and Logically speaking...

[@jvlp2046]

@@Haaaderkaderka6573 We are talking about the ORIGINAL INTENTION of the 2A drafted by James Madison that was ratified in 1791 A.D. ... and not the personal opinion of John Adams... You said it yourself..."A DEFENSE (not Private Self-Defense) of the US Constitution of the Government of the United States 1987-1788." Actually, it meant "NATIONAL DEFENSE."... not Private Self-Defense of the Constitution... who's making an AWFUL comment now? Facts and Truth of the Matters, Logically speaking...

[@jvlp2046]

@@Haaaderkaderka6573 Biblically speaking... Christ Jesus said, "You lived by the (literal) Sword/Weaponry, you will DIE by the (literal) Sword/Weaponry." (ref. Matt. 26:52)... Historically and Statistically speaking, "MOSTLY" (not all) come true with this passage... I hope it will not happen to you and to those who keep and bear ARMS for their Private Self-Defense... and not for the NATIONAL SECURITY of the Free State...

[@alnett22]

I wish more pastors could understand this. Can I belong to your congregation

[@coachsixstring]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXSrp4xpiaeKmsU

[@alexmora8841]

This is why context is so important… Jesus was talking to his disciples only about something completely different….

[@pastorstan3720]

And what was He talking to them about?

[@Thebibleauthority]

That's a total contradiction to what Jesus did, why didn't Jesus use the sword, because he said, my sovereignty is not of this world. Jesus never told anyone to buy any swords to defend themselves, that makes no sense, that would contradict ALL of Jesus teachings.

[@MR57LV]

Well said. I carry everyday in Las Vegas

[@encryptlakegames5328]

Man. Anyone that thinks God would rather you die than defend yourself is misguided. The verse that bothers me is the interpretation of thou shall not kill. The original text said murder. Which yea since murder is malicious intent. Killing someone that intends to kill you wouldnt be murder.

[@ecoffey71]

Here's my question.what if you stood by and watch someone get murdered when you could of stopped it?Do you think God would approve?A Christian does not desire to take a life but I think it's also A Christians obligation to protect the gift God has given.Theres a huge difference between killing and murdering

[@RochelleRoseGoes]

The answer to my question finally arrived ... I was all the time trying to find answers from 9 months if i need to contest in the annulment of our marriage

[@joshanddianaboling3575]

The Greek word here for sword is "machaira" which is a short sword. It could be used for attacking but it is more like a utility sword. Almost like a tool. When Jesus says "It is enough" He isn't talking about the swords. The Greek here is "eimi hikanos" which is translated: I Am enough. It is the same "I Am" when he says I am the way, It is the same I Am when he says before Abraham was I Am. I believe what Jesus is trying to say here is this: The way it was before is not the way it will be now. You will face persecution and difficulties. Before when I sent you out it was a more friendly situation. Now it will be difficult, but I am enough. Trust in me. You can take provisions but know who your provider is.

[@EloraSelah]

You are adding to scripture

[@ericcervera6355]

2 swords between between them, some Christian’s can’t do math. They want to buy an arsenal

[@som000]

Why would Jesus need sword? The one(Jesus) who is pure and worthy enough to say a word and defeat the devil , calm the storm, raise dead people, does he need swords for protection from men ? And why only 2 swords were sufficient??? if self defense is all Jesus wanted of us..why didn't we read of it anywhere else in the Bible? May the Holy Spirit give us His guidance and wisdom to understand each word of the Bible in its actual meaning and not be mislead... Praise be the Jesus. to my understanding this was just for the fulfillment of Isaiah 53:12.

[@rickycowan6969]

Jesus did not tell His deciples to go buy Him a sword, He told them to get themselves a sword. Jesus is not of this world, we are in this world.

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

For a more biblical understanding of this story check out the video on our channel called: "Two Swords is Enough", where we use Scripture in proper context to explain the meaning. Blessings!

[@journeyfortwo5211]

What does Isaiah 53:12 have to do with a sword?

[@som000]

@@journeyfortwo5211 read Luke 22:37 and Isaiah 53:13. then ask for guidance of the Holy Spirit in the name of Jesus..

[@journeyfortwo5211]

@@som000 thanks, I've seen it now

[@mdmace8690]

God is responsible for the Old Testament and the New Testament. Please tell the Old Testament story of David vs Goliath. David was a simple shepherd, but he was trained to defend his flock. David fought lion and bear prior to the confrontation of Goliath. David choose a sling, five stones, and his faith in God to battle Goliath. Spoiler alert: the much smaller David ultimately beat Goliath. God wants us to battle evil.

[@jasoncole6083]

Luke didn't know Jesus. How can he possibly quote Jesus?

[@pastorstan3720]

Luke collected first hand witness accounts.

[@johnloftin2461]

This is just playing around and borrowing the text. The biggest way to deal with this is the example left by Christ and all Apostles. They all died not fighting back. They took it literally all the way to the grave. I suspect that before Constantine (325AD), lots of christians died following this literally. This is another instance of verses fighting each other and christians picking what they want. Peter was the ONLY christian recorded in the NT fighting. He was severely rebuked by Christ himself. Even in Revelation no Christian fights. All they do is cry out to the Lord for vengeance. Pastor is just finding a text to the contrary of one likes or listens too. I think it's very shallow that all the Prince of Peaces kids are looking for excuses not to do what is clear in the bible. Following this Pastors advice, how will any Christian truly be different from the world? Their not. they look the same as an apostate like me. I would call it sad, but at this point it's annoying and pathetic. Anyone can make that book say anything they want. Remember that Christ also told us to esteem our neighbor as better than ourselves. I don't think this stuff fights Christs message. Thankfully for you and me, HES NOT THERE!!!

[@eternal_ruler74]

I Am What I Am king David

[@JRock3091]

This is Jesus telling you to carry everyday.

[@coachsixstring]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXSrp4xpiaeKmsU

[@acts1711-bg4gs]

I personally wish you had back-up scriptures to use, but you stuck with this one and said "see? Jesus tells us to defend ourselves". I'm looking for the proper interpretation on this verse and this did not help much. Btw, i am pro 2nd amendment.

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

For a more biblical understanding of this story check out the video on our channel called: "Two Swords is Enough", where we use Scripture in proper context to explain the meaning. Blessings!

[@acts1711-bg4gs]

@@twenty-fivethirty-six3946 Just watched it. Thank you. Your interpretation is sound,well researched and convincing. God bless you for this delivery. 🇺🇸✝

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

@@acts1711-bg4gs HalleluYah! To the Father be the glory!

[@WyldeCoyote223]

The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. (John 10:10) If as christian men, we dont defend the innocent, we are in sin against God. In a fallen World there is just warfare of innocence and defense. Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends” (John 15:13) Nehemiah 4:14 Remember the lord your God. Fight for your brethren, your sons, your daughters, your wives and your houses For he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer (Romans 13:1-14) Psalm 23:1-6 Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him (Exodus 22:2)

[@kwonder6796]

Mr. Pastor; if you look at the verse in its original language, the word "sword" is actually called "makhai" which is not a weapon, but a utensil or tool...like a camping knife. And, when Saint Pete used this to hurt someone, the big J was like; 'hold on...you're not suppose to go off cutting ears with these things!' Further more; if Yeshua (Jesus's real name) endorsed using weapons why didn't the early Christian church defend itself, rather than being eaten by lions? Maybe, this is just another case of using a really smart, super cool, turn the other cheek, jewish guy into an American action hero. Maybe, if we all listen to Yeshua's 'actual words' and actually followed his example we wouldn't need 'swords' in the first place. God bless and stop the madness.

[@kennethmeeker6369]

Original scripture had know punctuation,so everybody interprets a bit different, apostles died for there belief in Christ not random people killing for know reason, the person killing and the killer knew exactly why they were doing what they were doing, the intent of the heart will be judged by god,not everyone was to be an apostle or teacher etc ,I’ll definitely take my chances on protecting my family ,Peter was trying to prevent Jesus’s capture and it was time for him to do what he was sent for ,they all died for the gospel not random acts of violence, my take anyway lol

[@aleisterbroley900]

In that time period, those types of "swords" were the common person's means of self-defense as well. The classic sword, designed and used solely for fighting, was mostly the province of professional soldiers. Norse peoples, for example, had a scramasax or seax which was used for everything from skinning game to chopping roof shingles to defending themselves/fighting. And Christ rebuked Peter not for using his knife for other than its intended purpose (lol how ridiculous) but because it was His time...also because He did not come to earth to lead an armed revolt, as you well know. Attempting to misapply Christ's words and actions during His time on earth to say that no one is allowed to defend themselves is absurd, and no less devious than any other twisting of Scripture that people do.

[@LoneStarRocker]

Mark 8:35 For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it.

[@Thebibleauthority]

Christianity is not from God, it is from Paul.

[@wldo5210]

Pastor Stan, thank you for sharing. When there are two Jesus replies that's enough. One might interpret is the reason for swordsd is to prepare the feast. But, instinctively and most likely human nature would prevail during an assault. Prayers to you and your loved ones

[@twenty-fivethirty-six3946]

For a more biblical understanding of this story check out the video on our channel called: "Two Swords is Enough", where we use Scripture in proper context to explain the meaning. Blessings!

[@meptune]

One could also interpret it as interpolated text.

[@jvlp2046]

The English word SWORD is not a literal Weapon... in Luke 22:36... it means "WORD of God" sharper than any Double (2) Edged SWORD that can cut/separate/divide the Soul from the Spirit... narrated in Hebrews 4:12... It is a SPIRITUAL Weapon for Self-Defense against Satan/Evil Spirit and not a literal PHYSICAL Weapon for Self-Defense of the Human Body (flesh)... Amen.

[@EloraSelah]

Again adding to word. So u are saying jesus was saying sell your garments and buying word of God

[@jvlp2046]

@@EloraSelah Luke 22:36... "He (anyone) who has NO SWORD (no God's Word from their Hearts and Minds), must SELL (give up) their CLOAK/GARMENT (their Pride/Status/Stature in life) and BUY (humbly acquired the knowledge and righteousness ) ONE (of God/I AM)." The Spiritual message in this passage is... "Anyone who has No God's Word from their Hearts and Minds must give up their PRIDE, STATUS, and STATURE in life to humbly have/to acquire the knowledge and righteousness of God"... Seek ye first the Kingdom and Righteousness of God, and all shall/will be added unto you." (ref. Matt, 6:33)... "Do not be FEAR Men who can KILL only the Body (flesh), bur FEAR God who can destroy both the Body (flesh) and Soul/Spirit in Hell... (ref. Matt. 10:28)... Praise be to God in Christ... Amen...

[@Haaaderkaderka6573]

​@@EloraSelah jvlp2046 is a false teacher and maybe a bot of some kind. Ignore them. They're been trolling this entire comment section.

[@twat1952a]

I would think that if the Disciples had interpreted Jesus as saying to arm yourself for future events we would see examples of the Disciples using weapons to arm and defend themselves from that day forward and it would be recorded in the Bible. I am not aware of any examples of this. Certainly not any evidence that the Disciples went forward into the world after Jesus' death defending themselves with arms.

[@RochelleRoseGoes]

Thank you Jesus Christ for restoration in my marriage with Floyd Custodio Goes my husband

[@Jasho-Beam]

No, he isn't telling us to buy swords to fight with people. This is why is is so dangerous listening to people teaching the Bible when themselves don't understand it.

[@IeatBeef4ever]

Well you have to ask, is it loving to stand by and watch someone hurt someone else? Is is loving to the aggressor, to allow them to kill someone and grieve their conscience? Is it loving to the victim to stand by and let someone hurt them? Blessed are the peacekeepers, but you can not be a peacekeeper if the first time human evil confronts you, you are dead.

[@IeatBeef4ever]

@@victorstrong7378 A true peacekeeper is one who shows mercy even when he doesn’t have to. One who has every advantage, every power to deny something from another and willingly gives it over. See Jesus Christ, who had the power of creation, to call legions of angels to assist him, but died for you willingly. No my friend, a peacekeeper is not unarmed and non-violent. A peacekeeper is one who is armed to the teeth and chooses to give rather than be taken from.

[@winolowardichelli2850]

@@IeatBeef4ever "thou shalt no kill"

[@IeatBeef4ever]

@@winolowardichelli2850 “The original Hebrew, lo tirtsah., is very clear, since the verb ratsah. means ‘murder,’ not ‘kill.’ If the commandment proscribed killing as such, it would position Judaism against capital punishment and make it pacifist even in wartime. These may be defensible or admirable views, but they’re certainly not biblical.”

[@alexmora8841]

Thank you!!!! Finally someone says it!!!

[@rodolfo5651]

When, pray tell did Jesus promote someone attacking an enemy? The only example we have seen is when his follower attacked Jesus persecutor. He condemned the action and regenerated the attacker's ear. He most definitely does not promote weapons of mass death

[@LoneStarRocker]

Did Jesus say you can defend yourself with violence. No. I wouldn’t take one scripture out of context to justify the need to carry a gun. There’s no weapons on the narrow path other than our sword which is the word of God. Don’t fall into the trap of hating your enemies. Turn the other cheek and trust that God will protect you. The second amendment is not Christian and neither is this nation.

[@mitchconner6831]

Pretty sure that’s what you and the rest of the pacifists in the comments are doing. You misinterpret scripture to justify cowardice.

[@Norrbottning]

Fearful cowards are sent to the deep south. The lake of fire. If you just stand there passively like a bunny and let yourself be attacked, you're a coward. End of story So if you have the possibility, get strong and defend yourself when you have to

[@winolowardichelli2850]

Murder still a major sin.

[@mitchconner6831]

@@winolowardichelli2850self defense is not murder

[@winolowardichelli2850]

Trying to fit the bible to a particular speech is not right.

[@fredarroyo7429]

So basically your assumption imposed on the text

[@meptune]

Yes. 100%. He made this 💩 up.

[@kathleenwhitley7114]

Jesus also got mad at Peter when he cut the ear off the Roman soldier. He said live by the sword die by the sword! You are the very reason that people think it's OK to buy guns, and that is actually what's wrong with our society. God said lover of this world will not see the gates of heaven. Do you think he's really gonna let you in with a gun? Do you think you're gonna have a gun in heaven. Think about that, would God buy a gun? I don't think he would because he said live by the sword die by the sword. God teaches about forgiveness. How are you forgiving someone if you're shooting at him before you even talk to him? That is actually happening now. The fact that you could look around You and see all the innocent people, all the innocent children, getting killed and you actually say that. Let's hope God is in the mood to forgive you for teaching that it's okay to have a weapon and shoot people because that is false teaching. A lot of those guns come from people who are fighting for the right to own a gun. And if they're not using it on somebody their children are.

[@pastorstan3720]

Making a living by the sword is different than being a good steward and protecting what God has entrusted to me, my family. Would you really stand by and let those you loved be destroyed when you had the means to stop them? When Jesus walked the earth did not carry a gun because he was and is God. Are you also quick to condemn others who carry a gun for the defense of others like law enforcement and the military? Jesus does indeed carry a sword in heaven as it is written, 11 "Then I saw heaven opened, and a white horse was standing there. Its rider was named Faithful and True, for he judges fairly and wages a righteous war. 12 His eyes were like flames of fire, and on his head were many crowns. A name was written on him that no one understood except himself. 13 He wore a robe dipped in blood, and his title was the Word of God. 14 The armies of heaven, dressed in the finest of pure white linen, followed him on white horses. 15 From his mouth came a sharp sword to strike down the nations. He will rule them with an iron rod. He will release the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty, like juice flowing from a winepress. 16 On his robe at his thigh was written this title: King of all kings and Lord of all lords," (Rev. 19:11-16).

[@timothym2241]

@@pastorstan3720If it’s different, then why did Jesus rebuke Peter with those exact words?

[@mitchconner6831]

@@timothym2241because Jesus new his death was supposed to happen. He didn’t want Petter to throw his life away trying to defend him. Also if Jesus was so against his disciples carrying weapons. Why didn’t he forbid them from carrying swords? He didn’t tell Peter to throw the sword away. He said put it back in its place.

[@lawrencelehabe6809]

This is misquoting scripture to justify a carnal/worldly position of owning a firearm, scripture is deep and requires revelation which is clearly lacking in this presentation. There is no such justification in the Bible and this position cannot be advocated by a Pastor. You did say it’s a heavy topic and you missed the point completely.

[@pastorstan3720]

What is the point you say I missed completely?

[@gabrielmorales2458]

Why not keep reading one of them use the weapon when he struck the guy ear he said put it up .

[@aleisterbroley900]

Keeping on reading would do him no good if he does so without understanding, as you have done. Christ rebuked Peter because it was His time, and also because he wanted no blood shed in His name or on His behalf. This was not a condemnation of self-defense in general.

[@gabrielmorales2458]

@@aleisterbroley900 wrong he said that for peter an many more who would here that word if a men lives by the sword he would perish by it .

[@gabrielmorales2458]

@@aleisterbroley900 he did not say Peter he said if a man so that was speaking in general to all men if you pick up the sword you will perish by the sword do not put God or Jesus in a bottle and say he cannot protect you even if somebody is trying to harm your family that's just showing your lack of faith and trust in the Lord that he cannot protect you in times you need protection.

[@mdyzward8553]

@@gabrielmorales2458 He said to put it in its PLACE. Which was on his person where he had it while traveling with Christ. It wasn’t needed at that time. Living by the sword is not exercising self control and being quick to use violence unnecessarily. Defending yourself has nothing to do with living without faith. We have faith but still wear our seatbelts. We have faith but still shop, cook, and work so that we can eat. I know it’s scary to actually fight back but cmon bro pray for protection and allow God to work through you during those times of offense to protect your family and self. Should police not be armed? Militaries?

[@gabrielmorales2458]

So answer me this why he say if someone slapped you on one side give him the other side as well?????? A seat belt come on man really cooking working come on man let’s be real none of those bring harm to any one ?? He never said what to do after he says let some one slap you on the other side please answer me that an I believe what you are saying police okay I understand that’s there job

[@kitpenniall9224]

To be clear Jesus rejected the suggestion for the use of swords and later rebuked the use of one on the servant whose ear was cut off. Jesus does not support we carry guns..... the following is from Pastor Dave Guzik and two other bible scholars (Pate and Geldenhuys) It is enough: When offered the swords Jesus said this, meaning "Enough of this kind of talk" and was a firm way of ending the conversation. Jesus did not mean, two swords will be enough to battle the crowd that comes to arrest Me. "Jesus' answer, 'Enough of this', is to be preferred to that of, 'it is enough.' The latter might imply that Jesus affirmed the disciples' suggestion, acknowledging that two swords would be sufficient for the conflict. But the context clearly rules out that rendering." (Pate) It seems that the disciples didn't understand what would happen in the next several hours. Later Christians also did not understand what Jesus meant here. “In his notorious papal bull Unam Sanctum, Boniface VIII (A.D. 1302) built on this text his doctrine that the Pope has the right to exercise secular as well as spiritual autocratic rule over mankind - the two swords, he said, are the spiritual sword and the secular sword.” (Geldenhuys)

[@artandchill2480]

THIS IS WRONG PREACHER HE WAS SAYING IT SO THE SCRIPTURE WAS FULLFILLED WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED, HE NEVER SAID GET A SWORD AND BOAST, GET A SWORD AND KILL, I AM PRO 2ND AMENDMENT BUT YOUR PREACHING IS SO TWISTED.