What Does An Electron Look Like When You Rotate It?

[@TheActionLab]

Thanks to @lloydwatts60 for the design idea for the gears! Checkout his video with a wooden version and more insight into spin 1/2 (link in description)

[@VideoMakesMeHappy]

He did a video of this a year ago.

[@patrybc8843]

I was thinking, "wait a minute, deja vu??"

[@pratikdedhia]

I was thinking why haven't you mentioned about that video in your video. You put it here..

[@Dismythed]

You forgot to credit PBS Spacetime for the electron spin video.

[@VideoUpload_007]

Hey copied someone on youtube but your videos reach more people. And Science has no copyright on it . DUH!!

[@ShortHax]

Electron spin be like: Imagine a ball and it’s rotating except it’s not a ball and it’s not rotating

[@TheUnderscore_]

Seems legit enough

[@Hecarim420]

But actually u can make "abstract image" that u will collerate with this. It's good to watch all of kinds videos on one topic and even better when u mix it with math. Because in the end it's all math :v (with some philosophy)

[@riccardob9026]

Quantum mechanics in a nutshell

[@Flesh_Wizard]

I imagine them as spheres of influence teleporting around an atom so fast you don't know where it is

[@frenzygaming1]

I understand it...

[@CaravaggioRoma]

The thing of the belt actually caught me completely off guard!

[@JoeySonal]

Check out some more Topology demonstrations! They're mind bending, truly.

[@trigonzobob]

I tried it myself and it caught me with my pants down.

[@iloveplasticbottles]

It was quite the twist!

[@darthdr3]

@@KZbinr-dq3ko yeah because its an illustration.

[@DL-kc8fc]

@@KZbinr-dq3ko The microworld has no analogous function in the macro world. Schrodinger and his cat have already pointed this out, which in fact demonstrated that the microworld cannot be projected into the macroworld. Only in sci-fi is Schrodinger's cat misunderstood when quantum properties are applied in the macroworld and endless stupidity arises.

[@elNathNY]

This is my favorite action lab video. I have been thinking about electron spin for sometime now and have been showing my kids a slightly different version of 720° rotation using a plate that I hold in my hand. I rotate the plate palm up two full turns without dropping it and without twisting my arm off. The kids find it fascinating that one can do that kind of rotation.

[@kanib.7928]

Lol. I just acted out the rotation. That was cute. Thanks for sharing! 😊

[@jareknowak8712]

Yep, videos about quantum are the best!

[@shadow_entity9191]

Kudos to the people who walked around electrons to tell us about this.

[@chandraguptsingh7305]

😂

[@TBPlayz902]

Ya he did cut it was so easy to see the cut

[@SoapMcCallister]

@@KZbinr-dq3ko Bruh thanks capt obvious

[@rxqzl9263]

@@KZbinr-dq3ko thats not the point ofc he cut the video bc how else would this happend. This is just example to show how electrons work so it doesnt matter but yes u are correct

[@knyt0]

@@KZbinr-dq3ko no shit

[@huawafabe]

The Stern-Gerlach-Experiment is my favourite physics experiment 😅 It was conducted by 2 germans in 1922 (Stern and Gerlach). They were actually about to give up the experiment, but then the Reichsbahn (german railway) cancelled their drive home from Frankfurt, so they gave it another shot at night. It was later found out that the experiment only worked because they smoked heavily inside the laboratory, which would be insane nowadays 😂 The smoke caused the screen to make the 2 dots visible.

[@kwaherikwasasa]

And what makes it even more confusing, is that since Gerlach was German, he was also stern. ;-)

[@huawafabe]

@@kwaherikwasasa Stern is the German word for star 😂

[@jareknowak8712]

My favorite experiment is the Wheelers delayed-choice-quantum-eraser experiment.

[@sudhakarg8921]

nice to know..

[@self-proclaimedanimator]

Man electrons are like the USB port You put it straight don't fit flip it don't fit flip it again don't fit flip it again fits

[@frenzygaming1]

Yea

[@edfinite7534]

I actually agree with this observation.

[@SaxonRanger94]

Bravo sir

[@MichaelClark-uw7ex]

...therefore either USB ports are made of electrons? Or USB ports have 1/2 spin? Maybe its not the ports, its the plugs!

[@epicdud5905]

My last brain cells during a test

[@sebbes333]

It feels like the electron spin have some similarities to a *Mobius Strip* where you also need to complete 2 full "rotations" of the strip to return to the same side at the original position.

[@krisreddish3066]

That is the gist of it or the mobius strip is a macro world version of a path approximated by a spinor.

[@anupgautam2849]

Is it true

[@jesserobinson9674]

Might be off the mark a little but feels as though it may be something to do with fundmental characteristics of spacial dimensions. Almost non euclidean.

[@jesserobinson9674]

And of course because its quantum, there's no classical comparison 😅

[@jesserobinson9674]

Or like a point particles interaction with spacial dimensions, Idk it's on the edge of my comprehension 😂

[@imbatman62]

They are entertaining and educational at the same time...

[@mariadefatimajesusdorea3141]

Fdf

[@metamind3863]

Just plain awesome. As a fairly advanced scientist of 30+ years, I still always learn something refreshingly new and confounding from your videos. I love every one of them and your enthusiasm to match. I have no doubt you'll be making these for a long time to come. Thank you!... for serving us all.

[@DerpMuse]

@@KZbinr-dq3ko stop spamming you incel.

[@tsmith906]

You make physics much more simple with easy world visuals. Thank you.

[@user-hnjga8is1zr6u]

Basically he's NileRed but it's more physics. His voice is also extremely similar to NileRed and Brandon Farris.

[@madisonbrown8851]

his voice is less annoying than Nile's

[@kaminelson1277]

Niles voice is lower though

[@linkin543210]

Almost like he is a human….spooky 😐

[@lamao8190]

The Belt trick is amazing like all of your explanations ❤

[@reviewguru5457]

Always making amazing content.

[@Kislashe]

Thank you so much ! After many years looking for a way of understanding spin it is the first time I do. Not even in my native language.

[@helifynoe9930]

Now I am confused. The two spatial rotations required to return the electron to its original state, is to be expected in the first place, is it not ? The axis of the spin of an electron is not merely a spatial axis. The axis also extends across a certain measure of the dimension of time. So with this being a 4 dimension spin, one clearly expects exactly what you observe from a mere 3D perspective.

[@GetMoGaming]

The way you describe this is as if it's a real physical feature of the universe. Viewers should know - it's not. It's another workaround devised by theoretical magicians to get the data to make sense. That's quantum mechanics in a nutshell. It's a very accurate tool.

[@slusheewolf2143]

Of course, I'm intelligent to understand that lol What I can't understand and why I'm probably really bad at physics in general, is HOW AN OBJECT ISN'T ROTATING, but it looks like it is. The only way for that to happen is if something is rotating or moving around the electron, giving the illusion of movement.

[@GetMoGaming]

@@slusheewolf2143 You can't think of it in that way. For it to make sense, you must forget the classical form of a spinning object and accept it as a quantum property. -from Wikipedia: "While the question of whether elementary particles actually rotate is ambiguous (as they appear point-like), this picture is correct insofar as spin obeys the same mathematical laws as quantized angular momenta do"

[@stevesmith7839]

Wouldn't this indicate that there is an absolute orientation of space itself? Like the book with the belt closed in it. You move. The belt moves. The book stays the same. Therefore, only two states for particles, because they are embedded in something which maintains its orientation and has absolute position and absolute direction and therefore gives absolute vector velocity (not everything is relative).

[@Nefville]

You would think if you have to spin an electron twice to get back to the initial state that just maybe 360 degrees for you and 360 degrees for the electron are not the same. Perhaps there are more or less dimensions that an electron interacts with and that is the cause of the strangeness. As in it would take an electron longer to rotate through 4 dimensions, versus your 3.

[@Dil.7]

Great thought 👍

[@zbarba]

I don't think dimensions work like that

[@The_Real_Pimpaho]

That same Technic is used in Tank Turrets. That's how the turret can rotate a full 360 degrees and and the wiring doesn't get wrapped up

[@tim40gabby25]

Interesting real world application. Thanks. Old UK duffer here :)

[@The_Real_Pimpaho]

@@tim40gabby25 Hello my brother from across the Pond

[@tim40gabby25]

@@The_Real_Pimpaho Hi :)

[@deviles]

That was a very well hidden jumpcut at 1:00! The talking over hides it so well

[@ImmaWrongdoer]

Ikr

[@CanadaBud23]

The first rotation was flawless but I saw slightly in the second one. Clever cinematography. I love how you always throw a trick in there or two. 😁

[@caepohbasics3925]

3:45 It helps to say if you twist the belt 720 degrees clockwise you have to go under the book clockwise as well.

[@gluino]

Can you really walk around an electron if electrons don't ever sit still? 8:22 Can you show a drawing or animation about rotating apparatus and observing the wave function change?

[@channeldoesnotexist]

The wave function of a particle is not an observable. The resulting interference of two particles on a detector as a result of out of phase wave functions is.

[@GooogleGoglee]

This was extremely interesting even tough I would love to have mote insight and background to better understand it

[@Blackmark52]

A pretty good description of something that is more or less impossible to describe.

[@o04n7h0n90o]

I love this channel... one of my best subscriptions by far!

[@spiderdude2099]

If there was any other classical example that described electron angular momentum better than the word “spin”, we would probably use that and call it something other than “spin”. But calling it “spin” is still close enough to what’s going on that we use it. But just keep in mind, it’s VERY different than just the idea that the electron is spinning.

[@user-hnjga8is1zr6u]

Exactly what I thought!

[@cliffmathew]

Many times when I watch this channel, I feel I just watched some magic illusion. Amazing!

[@yeroca]

Analogies for understanding electrons have three things in common: they are helpful to a degree, they conflict with each other, and are fundamentally wrong. So far the only accurate description is from QFT, which is just math, and sadly doesn't easily whisper any intuitive understanding.

[@kanib.7928]

All analogies are accurate just to a point. I, one out of many, still find them useful as an introduction to the subject.🙂 I hope you will reconsider your view that hard learning = the best learning. Sometimes learning complicated topics can be understood in smaller, digestable parts. Otherwise, who'd learn at all? You may not have meant it, but why does your post sound like "sour grapes?" Perhaps one day QFT will become intiutive when we change our frame of reference? 😉😊 Lastly, I hope you enjoy QFT. 😊

[@slusheewolf2143]

1:09 was a jumpcut, but it was so seamless, I hardly noticed I wish video games loaded cutscenes and new maps like that

[@citratune7830]

sorry, but rendering doesnt work like that

[@abdobelbida7170]

@@citratune7830 can you explain to me why?

[@gameuck17]

After seeing the belt trick, this may explain how easy a slinky can be tangled and now we have a way to undo what seams impossible with a double overlap. To the stairs.

[@stevestarcke]

Excellent video as always. I learn a lot from this channel. Thanks and kudos to you.

[@drakonyanazkar]

These videos are always enlightening, but this one actually blew my mind at every turn! Very solid demonstrations and great editing. This is the kind of content I subscribed for.

[@alexk.4195]

To get the point you can play the "Antichamber" - a short (relatively) indie puzzle game . It has a lot of wierd perspective, spacial, non-flat topology stuff and etc. like impossible rooms and geometry.

[@dheeraj3945]

I swear, I never watched a better video explaining the behaviour of electrons

[@BlackDogHair1]

Did a 360 in my room. Interior changed.

[@SteveInScotland]

Oh, you redecorated…..I don’t like it……lol (if you know, you know!)

[@singularity844]

You have to do 3 360 turns saying Bloody Mary with the lights out lol

[@BlackDogHair1]

@@SteveInScotland 😂

[@BlackDogHair1]

@@singularity844 might have too🤨

[@GB-ty2uc]

So nice to see and understand concepts about electrons.🙏😊

[@hdhfhshx8546]

For anyone who wants a clarification: When you turn around the electron by 360⁰ you add something to the wavefunction that will not affect any measurement, so you will measure everything the same (for example: the spin direction, position, etc), meaning you actually CANNOT tell the difference by any means. But, if you take an electron in a superposition of two states, and rotate it by 360⁰ only in one of them, only then could you actually measure it and see it affecting measurements.

[@life0adventurer]

Amazing expression!

[@self-proclaimedanimator]

Ah yes expression

[@frenzygaming1]

Experiment xD

[@endgovernmentextremism]

By far, without a doubt, the best entry-level educational channel on KZbin.

[@dragonuv620]

As usual the video is great! But the sponsor for this video has had a lot of controversies and scandals attatched to it. I hope you have looked at their background before telling your audience about them. Otherwise a great video!

[@hannahbloom]

I thought those controversies were cleared up while ago?

[@dragonuv620]

@@hannahbloom I don't know much about that 😅 cleared as in?

[@storm37000]

@@hannahbloom idk about controveries, but who would pay 90$ a week for what most health insurance will cover elsewhere.

[@Entity_BlackRed777]

Belt twist untwist is so cool!! And I understood it!! (May try it myself tonight!!)

[@morgan-5171]

What if... Rods first seen @51 area. I'm guessing they have a partical accelerator, so what if these rods where the nucleis and these orbs we see are atoms buzzing around looking for there other half and when they meet bang lightning or earthquake....

[@TacoDude314]

4:30 animations are by Jason Hise.

[@victormultanen1981]

I love this explanation on electron rotation topic

[@jay-thetruth-stone12]

My brain exploded with madness when I saw the belt illustrations. And that's not even me exaggerating. Right on!!!

[@MmmBopsPops]

0:52 & 1:30 - WITCH! 3:06 - There's no better use for an O-Chem book than to weigh down something. Good use!

[@gordonstull1962]

A four-cycle engines valve timing does the same thing. Just like the four-cycle engine, the electron absorbs & releases engery from unseen particle-flow. The spin of an electron may be caused from smaller orbiting-particle systems moving around and into & out of the electron. It's always been my belief that orbiting-particle system's make up all matter, as well as all empty space, no exception to the rule. Thank you very much for this video!

[@storm37000]

Protons and Neutrons are made up of things like that, 3 Quarks bound with gluons rapidly rotating around each other. Electrons are more similar to quarks though and what your saying sounds along the lines of what string theory says.

[@gordonstull1962]

@@storm37000 I think of the string theory as being the dynamics of an under-square vortex, where coil & un-coil create those critical balancing mechanisms that make an open-loop under-square vortex strong.

[@-_Nuke_-]

8:49 wow this is relativity all over again I love it!

[@calebk1841]

Thanks! next time I happen go around an electron I'll keep this in mind

[@Moshinoki]

I find it really cool that you're doing mental health sponsors in a science channel, keep up the great work!

[@l0g1cseer47]

Cool vid! Sponsor ads should be at the start or end of the content to prevent interference or distraction in learning interesting advanced physics ideas. Thanks for your attention.

[@yurdp]

Like a particle Möbius loop.

[@donaldmilne5352]

Which is yet another more classical representation of the idea, yes :) If you imagine a mobius strip made out of transparent platic and start with an upward arrow facing you, then imagine the arrow moving 360 degrees around the loop, it will then be in the same position (facing you), but pointing down, with a further 360 degrees of movement needed to bring it back to facing you and pointing up.

[@e-alf-1]

the level of the topics is getting deeper and more interesting every time

[@a.i.chemist2261]

Think of it as a ball on a whirlpool. Once around and through, it would flip. Stuck under the water now the whirlpool point is "up". Once around and through corrects the orientation. Better yet, imagine doing a lap on a mobious strip. 1 lap places you in the same spot, or position, but flipped upsidedown. It takes 2 laps to get to the starting position and orientation. An Electron is just an eddy current at relativistic speed and size. Very compact in 3D space. Time adds the wobble as it moves across the ether in compression. This also explains spooky action and Quantum hopping. Imagine looking at the edge of a river, a slow deep part. Tiny whirlpools pop in and out of existence relative to us. It disappears but the energy is just spread out, but is still there and manifests in another location once it finds equilibrium. Sorry, I think I finally understand Quantum spin. It's easy to visualize and I'll bet everything fits. Feel free to say why not, but atoms are whirlpools, eddy currents in space. Think about the flow of space as pushing through a Mandelbrot fractal. The loops on the edge create eddy currents as space energy compacts in these spaces. Nothing lost, no friction, but less space to contain the energy. Except that curl isn't the size of the actual hole, you need to start zooming in by orders of magnitude and think about how much faster you move relative to what was the starting point. The energy of an atom bomb, vibrating at the speed of light, in stability....relative stability. We exist on the surface of the water. The very center of space. We are the center. Look down the whirlpool at the point, it is an atom spinning very fast. Now look up. Everything is spinning so slow, but same patterns. Now look across...everything is still. Existence can be observed and interacted with. We exist because of too much matter in too little space, and everything seeking equilibrium. Whirlpools of compressed matter. We exist in a "Lagrange" point of space as a whole. Observing particle spin is like sticking your finger in the whirlpool to see how it feels. It slows things slightly. Enough to collapse them. Seems legit. Thanks.

[@nusakara]

That cube animation, wow -))

[@LegendEditz100]

the reason is perfect time stopping and smartness and timed talking. thats the trick breh

[@danrazART]

Best visual assumption of electron spin on the Internet.

[@Youssef_Salmane]

This is the best video so far explaining electron spin

[@kanib.7928]

I love that you mentioned the The Stern-Gerlach experiment, and your insightful question and answers at the end! They were perfect follow up questions! Please continue to add questions and answers that reveal a deeper understanding to all your videos!❤❤❤👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[@davidhand9721]

Here's something I wish someone told me when I first learned about spinors: _Spinors are not physical objects that have an orientation in geometric space._ You can stop trying to think of how an object could have this 720° symmetry, an object can't. Spinors are not physical objects. They are mathematical objects. In fact they are transformations, specifically rotations that preserve a sense of orientation. The "space" they live in, where you rotate them 720°, is their _parameter space,_ not the geometric space in which you and I live. Actually performing the transformation on any physical object will give you the usual 360° symmetry; only the numbers in the parameter space can tell the difference.

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

I got so perplexed by your belt trick that I had to then call one of those Better Help therapists to bring me back to sanity.

[@fayeblake5463]

Belt trick is insane. This man always gives the fact.

[@7teven8onn]

Nice…. Truly creative ways of demonstrating the difficult to demonstrate

[@michaelcombrink8165]

Teacher's everywhere should take a dozen courses from you on how to make learning fun and amazing

[@philjamieson5572]

I think that was a splendid explanation. Thanks for putting this on here.

[@sharvilsawargaonkar5791]

Going under the book is also making the ends of the belt to twist

[@niravdarmesh5278]

I enjoyed the editing SO MUCH!!!

[@Tom-sp3gy]

You are simply fantastic ! Thanks a lot for all the extremely creative videos you make.

[@stevenborgogna]

Those are some clean jump cuts. Bravo!

[@khaliffoster3777]

So, it is static 360, dynamic 360, so combo it is 720, so require two 360 since one is in 360 so need double 360 to get back to 360, so the ratio of 1/2, which is 2 is 720 and 1 is 360, so need 2/2 to equal 1. The itself that is static is 360 is a circle represent straight in motion, and itself is dynamic is itself is in motion that is a 2 wave up and 2 wave down, so both waves are out of phase horizontally. 2 wave is 180 degrees horizontally than itself the point. As a whole, it is a spiral. The easy to understand is based on the first part that is a ball that you go around 360 and the ball change from + to -, so + is the wave function so 180 degrees up and 180 degrees down, up wave function and down wave function, that is logical base on electrons motion to cause current to happen from inward to outward, into negative resistance to positive resistance, to lower pressure to higher pressure, so it is connected to pure energy at the lowest level to pure energy that is in resistance at the highest level, so low density to high density. Everything is about motion since without motion you have nothing, with motion you have something even the existence of static which is the ball that has + and -, so it must be up and down that is the wave function. So, that is what disappears to appear, the virtual proton or virtual electrons, the cloud which you don't know what location where they are appears but ya know the section of location relative to the center that is the dot to the edge. The resistance is trapped volt which is not moving horizontally but inward to outward. So, there are three motions of a whole that is horizontally forward, horizontally up (vertical), and depth (the mass itself goes down vertical that is inward and outward). So, essentially losing weight of mass to gain weight of the mass. Depth is vertical of mass itself. There are two POV verticals since up and down, left and right, can be the same but different POV. Same with horizontal, well, to be accurate all things are one the dot, so horizontal, vertical, and depth is the direction of the position, the coordination. Mass is relative coordination to other relative coordination and in between the maSs is the space. To make it clear: horizontally, the ball goes straight but also it goes up and down the horizontally up and down, so that is vertical, and also the static mass goes inward and outward to disappear to appear, to weigh less to weight, so same as in other videos when you spin the mass get light but there is also a barrier of within the dot to push out the mass outward, you spin the wheel and the wheel goes leftward so there is a pressure to leftward or in this case the static mass that is outward, so there is left-, right-, in-, and outward, so it is a different motion. So, same principle, the spin of electrons cause outward pressure, well, to be accurate, radial outward pressure that is mass itself and the mass is in motion that is straight and up and down based on pressure like the pressure to the wheel, which the wheel is the mass and the pressure is the human or device that cause the mass itself to spin, so mass causing feedback to another mass. So, there is radical inward to radical outward that is pressure impact and pressure non-impact, so section of a pressure. Well, you press the skin and release the pressure on the skin, the skin goes down and outward, so inward and outward that is pressure up and down, same as electrons that is inward and outward to weightless to weight, so the energy is the pressure for depth and the mass pressure is for left and right, on the mass plane, the secondary plane relative to a primary plane that is Aether. Aether is the pressure to the electrons to make it disappear to appear in the section. Ok, the secondary plane pressure is coordination that we see that is north, south, east, and west, but the primary plane pressure is inward and outward. So, what we see is the edge of mass that is a pressure of outward so the tanget to the dot, so between the dot to tanget is the pressure field so the wave function which change negative to positive, so that is outward and inward, same on a meter for - and +, the line in between - and +, so + we see, and - we don't, so electrons is what don't see so it disappears then appears. So, limited visual understanding that is electrons in wave function and horizontal motion to cause as a whole is spiral, right, so also, it is mass spiral, but also aether spiral that is inward and outward in motion like you spin the wheel so you go around and the wheel go around with you, but the wheel is going around also, so there are three around. Horizontal, vertical, and depth. So, triple 360 is 1080 in total, so one extra 360 for inward and outward. Well, might be adding too much, but it is the understanding of how reality work.

[@Scrungge]

This was one of you more complicated videos (for me as a layman) but with some background on magnetism (and the link with unpaired electrons in orbitals) the video is definitely comprehensible.

[@acscp125]

This is also called the Dirac belt trick. This Is a really nice demonstration!!

[@CACBCCCU]

Enjoyed the geared electron models, thanks. Individual full-rotation handle cycles compare closest to interactions with single photon wave cycles. What electrons do while they're occupying orbitals is not detectable. One could say orbitals (stable electron states) are compact quantum event horizons and when an electron is induced to jump between a hierarchy of event horizons with different allowed energies it has to do a relatively large and exposed re-adjustment cycle whereby a photon is emitted or absorbed. To emit and reabsorb an identical photon, while potentially avoiding detection of any jumps between states, a quick sequence of two exposed electron pirouettes is called for, two exposed electron cycles to return to the same state. A photon is basically created in the image of an exposed electron dancing probably only once around an atom, an image with a definite direction. My 2 cents there, anyway. Vacuum-energy and electron mass inertia collectively assure photon leading and trailing edge overshoot/damping, I suppose. I sincerely believe interested people could do a whole lot worse getting their information elsewhere.

[@taiconan8857]

PSA: Be VERY wary of BetterHealth's Terms of "Service" They explicitly state they are *not* beholden to ensure you are matched with any form of professional, and essentially leave the responsibility of vetting your 'therapist' yourself. Pewdiepie did a reasonably good job exposing this almost 3 years ago. At a glance, when I revisited it, it would seem very little has changed since. You will find it nearly impossible to get a refund, and they charge you four weeks up front despite advertising the weekly rate. Some *may* get results, but you should be aware of what you're walking into. End of PSA But if you ask me, this puts my scam meter in the orange. It ain't a Bavarian-prince-email-Red, but it's close. Feels awfully predatory to "target mental illness" for profit like this without vetting your resources.

[@zeroroguer]

Very good illustrations. Thanks!

[@biologicallyawptimized]

Something about this also reminds me of when you hold someone's hand and spin them while dancing. You somehow never let go of their hand but eventually it untwists without breaking

[@beatsinabar]

That belt trick - it's the guitar strap puzzle that players struggle with at every gig!

[@christmassnow3465]

Would it make a difference if I spin the electron or walk around it instead? What will give me each of the scenarios?

[@iloveplasticbottles]

That belt trick was quite the twist!

[@WishPL]

book and belt trick blew my mind.

[@eliys5982]

The t-shirt you wear being on point with the subject, love the details you put in your videos !

[@abiralkc7398]

Your videos are soooo awesome.......and really useful ..thank you sooo much for your videos we all love u alot..😊😊😊🥰🤩

[@nullow7718]

you: what happens when you spin electrons me: electricity

[@christopherdeboer1500]

Is spin up vs. spin down just inversions of each other? What happens to the interference pattern when it is rotated along this axis perpendicular to the first? What happens when you rotate 360deg along one then 360deg on the other?

[@whuzzzup]

What interference pattern are you talking about? Stern-Gerlach has nothing to do with interference.

[@christopherdeboer1500]

@@whuzzzup at the 8:00 mark he was describing if you rotate the equipment in a stern-gerlach experiment you would get “constructive or destructive interference patterns”….I was just going off his remarks I don’t actually know the math and experiment in detail……it seems to have rough similarity with Thomas Young’s double slit experiment but that may be where the similarities end

[@freezinfire]

This used to bugged me in High School. Thanks for the explaination.

[@gettothepoint2707]

So... Nobody's gonna appreciate his video editing skills?

[@andymouse]

No, I found the splice !

[@jasontowns5119]

That was impressive as always. Thank u

[@ГеоргиГеоргиев-с3г]

I see the problem. 4x 180° rotations don't add up to 720°, but 360° (a paradox, only at first glance), because you are rotating around a sphere(whit some added complexity in the belt version), instead of around a circle, using 2 (90° offset, at different speeds) axis of rotation, but masked into one rotation, so you can't see them in the 3d model (a case where less is more, just look at one ribbon (seen this clip on PBS _ ))

[@jaybingham3711]

4:55 "Have you ever felt there was something interfering with your happiness?" Um...well...yeah. And I think you know what that is.

[@anoimo9013]

very cool¡¡¡¡ I want to know how you did the trick of the white ball

[@harald_schubert]

Most interesting video yet👍🏻😉😊

[@paulo-bini]

Can such turn movement to generate some kind of torque?

[@johnschewe6358]

If the experiment was done on a whole atom, then how do we know that the difference between spin up and spin down isn't just which side of the atom has more electrons upon entering the magnet shoot?

[@andewmayen2565]

Thanks to heizenberg's uncertainty principles we can't say when are more or less electrons we can just assume that since electrons are wave like things sometimes they are equally spread everywhere

[@johnschewe6358]

@@andewmayen2565 that just further abstracts the electrons out of the picture. Why should electron "spin" be responsible for the movement of an atom?

[@andewmayen2565]

This experiment isn't done on a atom at all the results involved the behavior of electrons like in a cathode ray tube it does nothing to matter what gas is in the tube or what no of electrons they have the results are of electrons

[@BooDevil65]

My brain is melting ... but you make it look so simple 😳

[@jwonz2054]

Dude just blew my mind! 4:45

[@geddon436]

Is there a good book to read that explains spin up/.spin down in more detail?

[@boredlake]

This is like one of those flip transitions in the powerpoint where you keep going forward slides but it turns 360 degrees and its a different slide

[@alwayscurious413]

Incredible tutorial - my head is spinning never mind the electron.