What does Srimad Bhagavat Purana says about Draupadi Vastraharan: Part 5

[@anuradham8435]

Very good analysis…thank you for the excellent knowledge 🙏🏼

[@prasteelprasteel]

The entire series is great and not just extremely informative but also suggest various analytical methods to be applied when trying to validate/ verify facts (with whatever available to date). On this subject, I agree and also believe majority of the people think "vastraharan" as such is an event/episode (the entire episode of Draupadi being pulled by hair and Dusshasan's attempting to undress her and so on and so forth). We have to clarify that "vastraharan" is an act, a very specific action, where where one's clothes are taken off or the person is disrobed. Clearly, with evidential text and references in Mahabharat, (and Bhagvat Puran as mentioned) Draupadi was NOT disrobed or her clothes were NOT taken off as Sri Krisna helped her with abundance of clothes at the time of the event. So yes, there was an attempt of "vastraharan", but it never got fulfilled. Thanks Nilesh sir for clarifying this as well as many more subjects and topics on India history 🙏🙏🙏!!! Many seekers like us truly appreciate your work.

[@NileshOak]

Thank you.

[@SaswatiBakshi-ip4vh]

Hare kisna

[@ashplv663]

I have not listened to the earlier 4 episodes but came across this one and, like many others, had a shock to listen to your unequivocal assertion the Vastraharan incident did not happen at all!! What a radical stand to take! Having listened to many of your video lectures and your books, I have enormous respect for your meticulous research. I will go back and start with episode 1!! Great work, Nilesh ji. 🙏

[@Snoozefor10minutes]

He is only asserting that vastraharan did not take place but an attempt was made and Krishna saved Draupadi. Look at other parts, especially 1st and 2nd part, it will be clear

[@SaswatiBakshi-ip4vh]

Beutiful

[@rrr4597]

Good job sir pls come on podcasts

[@cdm297]

Hello Sir, AMAZING in-depth research. I have watched your episodes 2wice just to understand it properly. They were very well articulated. Sir i am not able to find your part 6. Can you please share the link ? Thanks

[@tw2986]

Anywhich ways, the intent for vastraharan was there. And that is what that matters

[@Sairam-ud7cr]

Namaskar Mananiya Nilesh ji. Have you taken any research work on bhavishya purana, If so please relase discussion on it sir

[@Sairam-ud7cr]

As my parents taught me our athma is draupadhi married or occupying sharir made of pancha boothas( pandavas). When athma gets seperated from sharir referred to vastra, panchaboothas become inactive. Only Almighty can give a new sharira to Athma. Once a new sharira is given panchaboothas become active again. Thats Janana marana thathva

[@princesaha2699]

This is not added to the playlist

[@AdithiaKusno]

Is there part 6?

[@Qwe-lg1ej]

Have u read the book by Raja Ram Mohan roy "critical analysis" where he has said that he refuted your claims of Ramayans dating...??????

[@NileshOak]

Yes, I have. He does not understand the meaning of 'refutation'.

[@NileshOak]

@@prathameshdusane2619 Indeed. :)

[@Qwe-lg1ej]

​@@NileshOakyour podcast with ranveer was awesome .....It's the fastest way to make ur research popular ....😃😃👍

[@vice-108]

Lmao you believe in ram mohan roy the British stouge an agent of west traitor to the motherland

[@sadenb]

Don't know whether it happened or not but the war definitely wasn't anything to do with Draupadi.