What Does The Strong Nuclear Force Look Like?

Checkout our sponsor, Betterhelp, for 10% off your first month: www.betterhelp.com/actionlab
In this video I compare PFR to the strong nuclear force.
To contact Hamdi Ucar see his Twitter page here: / sudanamaru1
Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion published paper: www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/3/442
Shop the Action Lab Science Gear here: theactionlab.com/
Checkout my experiment book: amzn.to/2Wf07x1
Twitter: / theactionlabman
Facebook: / theactionlabofficial
Instagram: / therealactionlab
Snap: / 426771378288640
Tik Tok: / theactionlabshorts

[@duytdl]

When I was a kid, MIT lectures on KZbin were barely coming in, and they were long and boring and buffered at 240p. I really hope kids in school are watching your videos rn. Because while it's fascinating having my mind blown as an adult, I can't imagine the trajectory I'd have had if I had teachers like you, or even youtube with channels like yours. You're probably changing lives. Keep up the good work, man!

[@MrPaxio]

unlike the previous kids, we dont need to retain information when its accessible like youre saying

[@westonding8953]

@@MrPaxio that takes us down another rabbit hole but I have looked into reconciling these societal problems.

[@keyput415]

Check out @MathAndScience , longer videos for learning

[@kaltkalt2083]

When ahhh was a keeeed, we didn’t even have a youtube, you lil' whippersnapper

[@NativeAsElizabethWarren]

I WALKED TO SCHOOL UP HILL BOTH WAYS IN 7 FEET OF SNOW WITH NO SHOES OR SOCKS YOUNG MAN

[@midgetking101]

Holy cow! The fact that protons are little tiny bombs constantly holding back 20 lbs of force might be the most mind-blowing fact I've learned in all the physics courses I've ever taken. Similar to when I learned about the speed of electrons through electrical wire actually being a few inches per minute. Or the first time I learned that the classic explanation for asteroids burning up in our atmosphere isn't from friction but from thermal gas compression.

[@ThunderChunky101]

More than 20lbs. The strong force is what must be overcome, and that's the energy released.

[@heyspookyboogie644]

It’s funny how much more interesting the world is when you get real answers and not lazy dumbed down ones. I know when I was a kid, I’d much rather a real answer I didn’t quite understand over a simplified answer that just caused more questions than it answered.

[@Nulley0]

and then you realise you are made up of countless bombs

[@maynardtrendle820]

Agreed! I had no idea that it was so strong! 🙂 💪

[@Skrzynia]

For me it was the fact that the force u need to separate 2 quarks is equal to the energy that creates 2 quarks so after u separate 2 quarks u end up with 2 pairs of quarks its nuts

[@westonding8953]

Wow! The 20 pounds illustration is the best comparison for the EM force that I have ever heard!

[@ml4319]

That was the EM force. Strong force x >100 stronger than that.

[@gork42]

The strong force is more easily equated to the towing ability of a large pickup truck.

[@westonding8953]

@@ml4319 got it.

[@WIZ56575]

The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax. The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive. The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible. Here are some additional details about the EMDrive: The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001. Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.

[@robotninjashark1684]

I kept waiting for a “this is what’s ACTUALLY going on” moment, but it never came. I’ve love electromagnetic experiments like this my whole life. I knew about spinning a magnet against aluminum to use Lens’s law for repulsion, but that doesn’t allow for quantum locking. This is entirely new! I’m so glad you posted this!

[@HassanEido1]

This isn't quantum locking. The floating magnet is held in place by frequency basically. By the time it wants to move the rotating moves and changes its "target" and the floating magnetic vibrates in place more or less

[@vibhavshivadeker8288]

@@HassanEido1 So, basically you can say its cuz of property of inertia of an object?? Pls explain if im rong

[@vibhavshivadeker8288]

@@HassanEido1 meaning there is a delay between action and reaction...

[@sanchitsharma3260]

​@@vibhavshivadeker8288 means the magnet gets attracted to a pole but as it moves towars it, the poles gets switched because the other magnet is rotating. Then as the magnet starts to repell, before it could move farther the pole switches to the attractive one again. Which leaves the magnetic object in a constant state of attraction and repulsion, locking it in one place. And yes it does rely on the object's inertia. This is what as far as i understood. I may be wrong though.

[@Shanjaq]

​@@sanchitsharma3260 there's probably a frequency response to each magnet's material susceptibility creating a hysteresis curve with the proximal field intensity necessary to accelerate its mass at a given mutual polarity?

[@midgetking101]

I'm by no means a physicist, but I took extra physicist courses in undergrad because I was fascinated with how math can describe our physical world (ended up with a minor in physics). All that to say is that this video may have just blown my mind more than the first time we derived the time dilation and length contraction equations at relativistic speeds. Or recreating the double slit experiment. Thank you for posting.

[@imperialresolution]

Yeah, I Love These Experiments.. Lots Of Potential For New Ways To Intrigue The World.

[@jnhrtmn]

I studied physics in college and that transform equation kool aid did not register with me. I don't know how you can see it and admire it, unless that's just rote memory knowledge. The transform equations create a new reality for you by changing your numbers so that light speed can BECOME the constant that it is declared to be. Light is not "observed" to be constant relative to the observer. That comes after the math changes everything. This leaves an alternative non-transformed reality behind, and everyone acts like it just disappeared with no consideration at all. Gamma Ray Bursts, ALL of them, arrive here in order of wavelength. A proper scientific method would be to allow that different waves have different speeds. Modern science does not have THAT proper scientific method. Today, they declare a constant, then invent new things to maintain the constant. NEVER SECOND-GUESS A CONSTANT. It is a belief system through and through.

[@christianheichel]

​@@jnhrtmn I've never seen any science experiments that show that gamma rays would travel faster or slower than say x-rays or red light.... Could you point out some?

[@jnhrtmn]

@@christianheichel Gamma Ray Bursts. I said that already. Those all arrive here in order of wavelength from across the Universe with radio sometimes a month late. They will not say it that way, because to them it’s not true, even though that’s what they see. They invented a blast wave to fix it.

[@sgct89]

You may appreciate the movie Pi then 😅 I haven't watched it but love the concept in the trailer how the world around us can be understood with numbers (which to me means when you understand the world through the lens of numbers) you now have the ability to reverse engineer it and then re-create it (or the very least, aspects of it)

[@Eremon1]

I had a similar idea for a science project but was talked out of it by my teacher who didn't understand what I was trying to communicate because I didn't fully understand it either. At least it's nice to know I was on to something even if I didn't ever fully figure it out. This was a major flashback for me. Cool stuff. Cheers.

[@colinmcnamara344]

I've been exploring this phenom for the past year, and communicating with Hamdi off and on, so It's cool to see it getting some more traction. This Leonard-Jones potential lining up with the MBS force interaction is incredibly thought provoking. Beyond the analogous behavior to the strong force, building these setups has also helped solidify my intuition with regard to spinning bodies and magnetic systems in general. I also discovered that this effect can be nested/chained. Anyway, great vid!

[@originstarstudios]

How does the chain work?

[@username4441]

who cares bud

[@colinmcnamara344]

@@originstarstudioshey no prob! In a nutshell, i used a scheme where a floating magnet tends to spin and accelerates to match up to the rotor frequency. By adding another angled magnet to the first floater, it can function as its own rotor to support a secondary floater beneath the first. Which results in this cool vertical chain of floating magnets. Its very touchy but possible!

[@colinmcnamara344]

@@username4441 probably folks who are already watching a video about MBS?

[@username4441]

@@colinmcnamara344 wrong

[@raymitchell9736]

You got my attention at the end of this video when you started to describe the odd quantum and quarks... yes please elaborate on this more... The spinning magnet is very cool, reminds me a bit of the superconductor locking a magnet in place, but it doesn't oscillate... opens up a question about what would happen if... and leave the rest to you.

[@sudanamaru]

It oscillates. See the twitter channel in the description.

[@Hoshimaru57]

I was gonna say quarks spin so in effect this is EXACTLY what’s going on on a quantum level.

[@cadekachelmeier7251]

Seems crazy that this wasn't described before. We've been spinning magnets next to each other for a long time and watching what they do.

[@Mionwang]

This needs to be shared everywhere!

[@iustinianbogdan7479]

Woow. Your first video on Polarity Free Magnetic Repultion was so good, that it became an example for one of the problems required for the International Physics Tournament. This new video will help me solve it even easier. I'm so thankful!❤

[@thisq9829]

I’m watching this video at 1:02 AM! Lots of love from Australia ❤

[@MrElvis1971]

1:58am for me

[@PasiFourmyle]

Yes, entire video on quarks and gluons please❤

[@ivicino]

So I’m not a physicist, but actually a biologist. Your videos fascinate me, and you got me interested to learn more about the strong force and how these quarks work. I have no idea how all that works… Please make a video describing/ teaching this! Thanks :)

[@sudanamaru]

I have some visuals and texts in my twitter and yt channels for that

[@WIZ56575]

The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax. The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive. The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible. Here are some additional details about the EMDrive: The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001. Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.

[@GeoffryGifari]

wow polarity free magnetic repulsion is one of the coolest science demos i've ever seen! if the equilibrium distance can be tuned, its basically a tractor beam

[@MadGodsBand]

I wonder if this could be helpful in creating fusion energy, to keep the hot core suspended?

[@bensonburner3852]

This is what causes nuclear fusion. The point of fusion is to get the protons/nucleus close enough that strong nuclear force overcomes electromagnetic repulsion.

[@lalithajanghamaiha4446]

U'r project is giving me crazy ideas to weaponize levitation thanks bro the idea

[@MattSeremet]

I really enjoyed the extra details throughout and at the end of this video and that it wasn't rushed or too short. Please more longer videos! Finally subbing

[@erikschmidt2571]

Please make another video about the strong force and quarks!

[@myherotechnoblade8940]

The dedication is just perfect

[@toeknee3868]

Always a great day when you upload

[@indivisible885]

Im super grateful that you and your colleagues are studying magnets. For some reason, when i was a kid and made my first electromagnet, i felt that magnets are the key to everything

[@mdderrek9280]

That is great! I LOVED your previous video about magnetic locking

[@PitchWheel]

Not only you create incredible videos, but you even put two different interesting arguments in one single video!

[@theysisossenthime]

This is really cool. Makes me both apply my knowledge and inspire more thought. Thanks for sharing this.

[@Looldeos]

Great video, such a brilliant way of explaining things. I look forward to the one explaining the Strong Force.

[@matthewcurry3565]

Really great demo for visualization on this. Well done

[@FiercexDemon43]

First it went straight from my head, but when it starts to make sense the video ended.😂😅

[@d3consultancyservice12]

This is an extremely interesting and elegant novel mechanism for interactions, and I bet that it will revolutionize much in theoretical physics.

[@iceiceisaac]

I really appreciated the analogy you made. Great video!

[@eduardocantuaria6735]

This is a worthy video to save to be watched multiple times, great work!

[@jwcrawley]

I'd be interested to see the spinning magnet effect either on the magnetic force films, or with ferrofluid. Having a visualization of what's going on would be quite neat.

[@qwertyca]

Yes please, we'd love a video on the strong force!

[@emansfvera]

This is kind of a simplified version of what bob lazar explained of what he was working on when he did his government work with element 115. This will be the beggining stages of this type of technology.

[@michaeljordan215]

You have changed my life with this video. I am welling with excitement.

[@Sadenshard]

Great video, I am definitely looking forward to you making a video about gluons

[@cyclonasaurusrex1525]

Yes please: an entire video on the strong force.

[@brettiusmaximus8059]

I've been doing this for years and had no idea it was called PFR. I just called it a magnetic tractor beam. I like your setup better, the dremel tool I use is quite dangerous for reasons you illustrated.👍

[@KX36]

Really appreciate you talking a bit deeper into the science this time, rather than the usual minimal explanation

[@mudfossiluniversity]

I can demonstrate that force and do on my channel...it is a black Muon attached to the Electron Neutrino. When split it is BRILLIANT WHITE....

[@voidwyrm6149]

9:40 there are actually 6 color charges: red and antired, green and antigreen, and blue and antiblue. quarks can only have rgb color charges, anti-quarks can only have anti-rgb color charges, and gluon colors are mixture of rgb and anti-rgb otherwise, it was a great video and i learned something new

[@Grocel512]

Quark Gaming RGB Elite

[@HarryTzianakisTheGodOfSpeed]

Can liquid metal be turned magnetic and what would actually happen? How would it react?

[@carultch]

Yes, it is called ferrofluid. James has plenty of videos featuring ferrofluid. He's used it to make osmium float, due to secondary buoyancy from the magnetic "weight" of the ferrofluid.

[@justimagine2403]

Dang - this channel blows my mind. I was thinking that quantum locking like your superconductor cold puck on that track did. Fascinating...

[@keithcoyne]

This is back to your best. Top quality informative new science.

[@vladyslavkryvoruchko]

I would love to see the same experiment with an electromagnet that switches poles super fast (by switching direction of the current) and trying to levitate a permanent magnet. I am not sure if it will work, as you said in the video the spinning magnet is slightly tilted by 7 degrees, but perhaps if poles are switching instantly it will work out?

[@labiadhchokri2124]

We can do rotating magnetic filed as used in brushless or three phase asynchronous motor.

[@nikolaymatveychuk6145]

I think it will work. But you need to change polarity with different intervals to make attractive force little stronger/longer than repellent (I hope I said something reasonable, but my English is not good enough, I mean your electromagnet has to pull more than to push away). Короче тянуть должно сильнее, чем толкать, тогда естественным образом магнит улетая далеко будет притягиваться сильнее, чем отталкиваться, но при этом учитывая, что при отталкивании он устремляется от электромагнита, а при притягивании к нему, то подлетев достаточно близко, когда разница в расстоянии на этих двух этапах станет существенной, он остановится, так как в среднем начнёт отталкиваться сильнее, чем притягиваться (именно за счёт того, что отталкивание и притягивание происходит на разных расстояниях, потому что оттолкнувшись он потом притягивается с дальшего расстояния, а притянувшись снова отталкивается с более короткого)

[@pinocleen]

It should work but one could also make it out of multiple electromagnets simulating the rotating effect more precisely, or even simulating the 7 degree offset by varying the field strength. ?

[@vladyslavkryvoruchko]

@@pinocleen why tho?

[@pinocleen]

@@vladyslavkryvoruchko Just a thought experiment, and in case if what we are suggesting doesn't work.

[@kevinaguirre9306]

I would love to see the flux lines and a visible field between two magnets strong enough to attract each other in place of the bolts. Then the field formed might really be analogous to the nuclear force in the macro.

[@maynardtrendle820]

I think this is a beautiful analogy- and possibly, MUCH more! 🌞

[@heftycat]

I think this is the best video you've ever come out with...implications of this study could be really huge in terms of transit.

[@bradleydino6979]

I wonder what the minimum speed of the spinning magnet is. Or, if there's a functional highest RPM. This is just fascinating! Thank you!

[@sillyjellyfish2421]

I think that the speed of the spinning magnet necessary for this to work is in direct corelation with the inertia of the suspended magnet. From what i understand about this effect, the suspended magnet is trying to fly towards the tilted end of the spinning magnet, but since it has close to 0 speed initially, it needs to work against its own inertia to start moving. However by the time it starts going towards the closer pole, the field has been flipped, and now it's repeling it, and again, the suspended magnet has to fight its inertia/velocity, but in oposite direction. And so the suspended magnet keeps vibrating ever so slightly forward and back, and as a result it stays locked in place. So things that i think could potentially influence the needed speed of rotating magnet are: - size/weight of the suspended magnet (the amound of inertia influencing the acceleration of the magnet entering the magnetic field) - medium properties (introduces drag/resistance the levitating magnet needs to push against to accelerate) - the geometry of suspended magnet (asimetric center of gravity preventing the magnet from flipping itself as easily as a simetric magnet of the same weight) Basically, the more drag or resistance or gravity shenanigans you introduce, the harder it is for the suspended magnet to turn and flip around and the less rpm you need to keep it suspended. That being said, aproaching the minimum rpm value, this position is highly turbulent as the suspended magnet is almost able to follow the magnetic field, but not quite, so higher speed you use, less vibrations you get.

[@danielpaschall8367]

Silly Jellyfish is correct. I made this levitation device, it requires about 1 watt of energy to a DC motor, 12v and RPMs range around 5 to 10 thousand rpms, depending on magnet sizes.

[@dbfusion]

can you please put the motor with its stand on top of a scale and weigh the whole setup while its spinning then add the two other magnets on each side floating and check if the weigh on the scale is increased or still same .

[@nikolaymatveychuk6145]

it increases. There is no difference from holding the magnets in place in any other way (by a thread or a stick). If the magnets lose its weight something has to get extra weight of the same amount.

[@danielpaschall8367]

I made this and have this device. Floating magnets pull on motor, which pulls on stand, which earth holds against gravity. They weigh the same, i think unless i broke physics? I could test but weighing moving magnets is difficult, they are attracted to the scale, hence why James put a box in between

[@ytrew9717]

the most interesting video I watched for months. It's super well explained (I'm not super educated, and slow to understand). Thanks a lot!

[@Iseenoobpeoples]

Great video with actual technical terms.

[@onionknight2239]

That was awesome. It kind of acts as a superconductor locking it in at that location. I wonder what kind of applications this we'll be used for. Another Super cool demonstration! 👍👍

[@pramodpoddar1015]

Please make a separate video on Strong Forces and Gluons :D

[@williamiiifarquhar4345]

This is great! Thanks for making this video.

[@recramorcenlemniscate7945]

You do amazing visual demonstrations of scientific principals.

[@anthonycarbone3826]

That is the one of the coolest things I have ever seen. Thank you for sharing and it makes one wonder if humans can skip superconductivity and go right to this Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion property.

[@inzanozulu]

As someone else said - explaining the strong force really got me in a scientific mood because while I'm generally familiar with electromagnetism, I never knew the Strong Nuclear Force wasn't fundamental, and hadn't heard of the Strong Force before. It explains a lot of questions/confusion I've had with quarks, so I hope you do a followup!

[@lsdlsdk4845]

Thanks for the detailed information given

[@moroniafrifa614]

Whoa! This video is on a whole new level, thanks a lot!

[@stumccabe]

Fascinating, especially because such a simple phenomenon has only just been discovered.

[@kerryhaycock9446]

Still Amazed how James as a Chemist can cover such wide physics territory . I wouldn’t be surprised if even Sabine Hossenfelder subscribes to your videos ..

[@pinocleen]

I'd hazard she's more into hairstyling and singing videos, perhaps comedy, but she's German!

[@sudanamaru]

Never after this video :) James crossed the territory of physicists despite he repeatedly saying it is an analogy.

[@tatianaes3354]

His field is closely tied to physics because he is not a pure chemist, but a PhD in chemical engineering. The physics is hiding in the engineering part.

[@WillLeingang]

I really appreciated how you briefly covered Pions, Misons and the London dispersion force at the end… just to remove any doubt that I have no clue what you’re talking about 😂❤

[@sirmacintoy]

You are absolutely amazing. I have a fulfilling research career in another field and you almost make me want to switch to physics instead! 😂

[@dryued6874]

Please do a separate video about the strong force! There's a lot going on.

[@willarn1]

Yes please do entire video on strong force and gluons

[@jamesbarisitz4794]

Awesome explanation of complex subject. Looking forward to gluons! 👍 😃

[@Jordan-tr3fn]

I tweeted about this a few years ago. I even asked ChatGPT a few months ago about that phenomenon. I made some drawings also. you could levitate object by generating a magnetic field but the field would be so strong that you would need a graphene case to "block" it. You could use liquid mercury in a rotating hollow sphere.

[@nirodha7028]

‘If it is so strong, why doesn’t it just pull everything together and create one giant nucleus?” Black hole enters the chat :-)

[@user-kq8rk1vd3u]

Your channel is the only channel make us live the science this make science easier than watching lectures. Thank you 🙏

[@mytube001]

Loved the video. Love the t-shirt print! :D

[@JoeJ-8282]

I'm a nerd myself, (but NOT technically a genius by IQ standards), so this was mostly completely over my head in comprehension of it all, but this was still a really cool video to watch! It seems like just the basic behaviors of the magnets in this kind of configuration could be utilized to make some kind of new machine or something useful for society, I just have no idea how to utilize this behavior to do anything useful with it.

[@florntlaze810]

if you look up Gogo from big hero 6 i think you could see the application for spinning magnets like this with her science project.

[@JoeJ-8282]

@@florntlaze810 Oh, of course... Some genius kid already thought of something useful to use this for, lol! I should've known.

[@WhileCarlos]

So cool

[@sandrawong6787]

It's so cool to see how far my old comment has come I remember telling you about my spinning magnet observation 3 years ago and finally we're seeing something

[@ruialexandrepereiradossant8286]

fantastic, like looking into space, and seeing two black holes in sync, or a processor working something like that

[@heynryhoo]

I don’t understand anything but enjoying it

[@jennifersuiter7284]

Same

[@nikolaymatveychuk6145]

Thank you for a nice video! yeah. It is a great idea to make a whole video about the strong force and gluons :) Because this video sounds like "you know, it just works this way, accept it!" ))) I mean, this video is really interesting and I would be happy to watch more, but I want to be able to understand something and not to blindly believe in it.

[@girenloland]

School?

[@nikolaymatveychuk6145]

@@girenloland not really. But I only have school education. :) so, yep, sort of...

[@Maisonier]

wow amazing video !!! thank you for sharing knowledge

[@shawnvofficial]

I just want to say thank you, genuinely, I've learned more from you than I ever did in school, and the funny way you say "woah" cracks me up everytime 😂

[@glenncurry3041]

Does the effect work if you rotate the magnetic field rather than a magnet itself? If you were to turn small fixed coils on and off in a rotary orientation?

[@cliffmathew]

I doubt if rotating the field it is going to work - because rotating cannot simulate the the 7 degree angle which appears to be important

[@tigerdsouza7152]

no need to turn the coils, just oscillate the current

[@vladyslavkryvoruchko]

In my opinion, you do not need many coils - you can have just one. You can switch magnetic poles by switching + and - when you run electricity through the coil. I am not sure if it will work that way, because it switches poles instantly, and it probably with just fling the magnet into space

[@Max_Jacoby]

@@cliffmathew isn't incline just makes one pole stronger than another relatively to other magnet? I'm pretty shure it's not hard to recreate.

[@cliffmathew]

@@Max_Jacoby I am not clear what effect the inclined mounting produces. I am waiting for someone else who might know this to clarify.

[@TechsScience]

It it necessary tilt the magnet to make it work?

[@danielpaschall8367]

Not in general for various reasons, but tilting the magnet is the most reliable and resource efficient way to do so.

[@DG123z]

Excellent work. Thank you.

[@4grammaton]

@ 8:00 Reminds me of rotating a block in some versions of tetris to keep it stuck in place and give yourself time to think.

[@johnnycharles702]

Does picking up the magnet increase the weight of the device?

[@nikolaymatveychuk6145]

yes! It's physics, not magic :)

[@nerd26373]

Have a good day. Bless you all.

[@ananttiwari1337]

Are you ready to have your kidneys consumed?

[@jchoneandonly]

Really dig this video format

[@automateddude]

Thanks for this video, you help people learn effectively unlike others!

[@srikanth-xi9cb]

KZbin be like 1 views 5 Likes

[@Aerox90]

For me it says this video was uploaded 12 minutes ago, yet your comment was posted 15 minutes ago 😂 The laws of logic apparently don't apply on KZbin 😂

[@thewiddler1746]

KZbin commenters be like 1 braincell 0 awareness

[@theonlyreal615]

‮It is very normal on youtube man fr

[@scottmatznick3140]

@@theonlyreal615 big fan of Crowley, eh?

[@srikanth-xi9cb]

@@Aerox90 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@TrainsandRockets]

Awesome comparison... Great content always interesting...

[@DalekOverLord101]

Absolutely fantastic, thank you for sharing this. I’m going to get my Dremel now

[@ATVProven]

Great videos as always and very through.

[@paulbergin4239]

Great content as usual. Highly educational.

[@maheenmashrur2574]

I've had a similar thought experiment a while back. You never see a multi-proton nucleus without neutrons. Protons and neutrons in a multi-proton nucleus converts into one another via quantum exchanges. And similar to the Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion effect, whenever a proton is on the verge of getting deflected by another proton, one of them or both converts into neutrons via quantum exchange, resulting in a nullification of the repulsing force. Good to see a proper representation and explanation of this phenomenon. As always, great video!

[@miked412]

This made me realize I know less about this topic than I previously thought I did, thanks!

[@xzendon]

Quarks can be modeled as elastic loops that are linked together to form protons and neutrons. This easily accounts for the various spins, interchangeability, and color charge mathematics.

[@jascha5303]

The fact that you can lock a magnet in place this way seems so reasonable it's weird nobody's ever tried it xD

[@Giarko]

This is amazing!🤯

[@jackturner5164]

i love magnets ... and i love you. thanks for the stuff you do. its cool, its relative and you make it all make sense they it should have. Respect.

[@rherman9085]

What a fantastic demonstration.

[@JohnSmith-jq9xx]

THIS WAS FREAKING AMAZING !!!! THANKS !!!