What Happened to These 80`s Cars That Made Them SO UGLY?

[@IanJones-sf4uz]

I owned an XT and loved it.

[@BotanicAlpaca]

Didn't see ONE ungly car on the list man, they are all freaking awesome!

[@USAutoLegacy]

They are all great cars, but in comparison to the looks of other cars of that time, these were like the ugly sisters.

[@BotanicAlpaca]

@@USAutoLegacy 🤣

[@bmolendijk7884]

Fiat panda was inmensly popular in europe at that time, like the mini

[@AsianFlew]

There's a joke told by a character in the movie "Trading Places" that a snail had the letter "S" painted on the roof of his car because he wanted people he passed by to say "look at that 'S' car go!"

[@USAutoLegacy]

Great joke! Thanks for sharing!

[@Gabrong]

dude, most of these arent ugly at all :D

[@surrealengineering7884]

If you had ever driven a car on rural italian roads, you'd know that no other car but the Fiat panda 4x4 makes sense. Especially mountain roads. Literally everything about that car is practical. The width, the unpainted plastic bumpers for bump-parking and driving narrow roads, the relatively good interior space for 4 people thanks to it's boxy shape. We were in German cars and felt out of place, constantly panicking, we'd scrape something, while the natives had fun driving their Pandas. That car was not ugly designed, because it was not designed. Designer was sent on vaccation, when fiat made the car. xD A simple hammer can't be ugly, it's a natural tool. The Fiat Panda is that simple hammer as a car. And yes, the car makes absolutely 0 sense, if driven on any road that was designed for cars specifically, like in the US, or even the Italian highway system. Then it quite sucks. Otherwise agree with the List. Great Video!

[@USAutoLegacy]

Thanks! Glad you liked the video! Yes, the Fiat Panda is a practical car, not such a "good looking" car.

[@surrealengineering7884]

@@USAutoLegacy True

[@oddzandns6877]

If I had the chance of owning any of these cars I would. They would be cherried out and only parked in the garage. Love em.

[@bazilwreckerloughead]

I remember my younger brother used to have a Nissan Pulsar (with both hatches), he loved it, I just thought it looked *awkward* !

[@Bimeerwa]

An me sitting here and thinking why I love half of the list 😅

[@USAutoLegacy]

I love most of these cars, they are all great cars, but compared to other of that time, they weren't sooo beautiful.

[@bjrnrogne8026]

Some of the worst takes I’ve heard. Also, can someone please give Andy Richter his voice back?

[@lordterra1377]

They look a lot better than modern cars.

[@USAutoLegacy]

Some of them do.

[@anderssoderlind6183]

Ugly no just weird.

[@redmr2na]

None of these cars are ugly. The one that boogles my mind as to why people call it ugly is the Ferrari Mondial. Sure its wasn't a poster car like a 308, testarossa or countach, but its far from ugly. Stop calling the mondial ugly!!!

[@USAutoLegacy]

That's exactly the criteria why so many car enthusiasts call them ugly, because there are other cars of that time that have better looks.

[@agegroot5666]

Some looked worse than others but it's all a matter of taste.. Cheap cars weren't the beauties among cars no matter what era you take.

[@USAutoLegacy]

Up to this day it is so.