I was hoping to see some more programming languages, especially Java, and C#. Nice video, I could watch it for another half an hour without getting bored :)
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
I didn't show other programming languages like C++, C#, and Java because they don't have a power operator, instead they have power as a function that takes 2 parameters, therefore there is no order ambiguity.
@Theforgotten-b7g2 ай бұрын
So (2^2)^3 will be 64 and 2^(2^3) will be 256. Different if 2^2^3
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
In C#, the power is done like `Math.Pow(base, exponent)`, so you would have to put ether `Math.Pow(2, Math.Pow(2, 3))` or `Math.Pow(Math.Pow(2, 2), 3)`, so there is no way to just put 2^2^3 without specifying the order. Also note that in C# `^` actually means XOR, not power.
@TheNumberblock3.2752 ай бұрын
(2^2)^3 = 64 2^(2^3) = 256
@IzzumiPoshaf2 ай бұрын
Yes!
@Wind2000channel2 ай бұрын
Logically, neglect can lead to a difference.
@OgBunnius2 ай бұрын
this is why i was confused i was doing 2^(2^3) (cuz tetration)
@maxdoescatsim2 ай бұрын
@@Wind2000channellike a crime for something like negligence???
@JustBlack4Ай бұрын
fr ok…
@CantEscape1.4M2 ай бұрын
some calculators apply (2^2)^3=64, and others apply 2^(2^3)=256 because some operating systems think differently
@Cart14162 ай бұрын
aw man apple didn't think different
@darkspine67102 ай бұрын
256 is the correct answer because of no parenthesis
@jcaesar60172 ай бұрын
@@bitonic589Should be the second one. The priority of exponentiation is done from top to bottom (aka from right to left if you're using ^ sign instead of superscript to represent powers)
@Md.Mars69Ай бұрын
Why Did It Output 34 In My Calculator?
@TON_618_BHАй бұрын
@@jcaesar6017 Lucky for you, i have face moiji keyboard so yyou can imagine 2² There we got an exponent of 2 and 2 we always caculate exponent of exponents from the top number first, after some times it will get the finl exponent and then caculate it
@4rxino2 ай бұрын
Explain why 8388608: 2^23 is equal to 8388608. Because can't use multiple exponential that break a integer limit easily.
@4rxino2 ай бұрын
4:52
@DavyB812 ай бұрын
That was due to a limitation of some kind? I just thought he screwed up when he was entering the numbers.
@RussiaInfiniteBadlanderАй бұрын
@@4rxino he forgot to add "^" between 2 and 3
@ThatRandomToast2 ай бұрын
For Windows 10/11 Calculator, you should be referring to their app versions, as they're updated independently from the OS (via Microsoft Store).
@sameerasw2 ай бұрын
4:04 Actually macOS shows 256 in calculator as well as in math notes and spotlight
@markusTegelane2 ай бұрын
it looked like a very old version of Mac OS X, probably Apple did something that caused a change in the order of operations
@sameerasw2 ай бұрын
@@markusTegelane Gotta be.
@Xpoint.ZeroSuou2 ай бұрын
Yeah, newer versions of macOS started using the iOS calculator. iOS 18 gets 256.
@citrus.airways2 ай бұрын
@@markusTegelaneYep. OS X Mountain Lion is shown in the video which is from 2012 iirc.
@Xpoint.ZeroSuou2 ай бұрын
@@bitonic589 Yeah, the older version was.
@edwardcap72 ай бұрын
According to the Order of Operations, there is a rule that states: --- *Exponential towers must be done all the way from top to bottom, so 2^2^3 = 256.* _This is also the case with operations inside exponents, as exponents act as a grouper._ _Inside operations should be done first before the outside._
@Buckybadgerwisco2 ай бұрын
FINALLY ANOTHER CALCULATOR VIDEO AFTER 16 MONTHS
@blue_alan.becker__real2 ай бұрын
NO WAY ITS HIM!!
@Buckybadgerwisco2 ай бұрын
@@blue_alan.becker__real how did you find me 😱
@쉬릿-0_o23 күн бұрын
j
@uahnbu2 ай бұрын
As quoted from the Wiki page about Shunting yard algorithm, exponent is evaluated right-to-left, unless you're using another logic that is not extended from such algorithm.
@rtxagent63032 ай бұрын
It’s multiplication/division, meaning it’s what every one is first for those. Same applies for addition/subtraction
@쉬릿-0_o2 ай бұрын
😅m😊
@rtxagent6303Ай бұрын
I think this comment was supposed to be a reply to another comment. Idk why it’s pinned
@Yehor-v7y21 күн бұрын
@@rtxagent6303how do you accidentally not reply?????
@rtxagent630321 күн бұрын
@@Yehor-v7y I don’t even know honestly. Maybe I should just delete this comment lol
@Yehor-v7y18 күн бұрын
@@rtxagent6303 no don't do it
@technoWZ55982 ай бұрын
I'm going to make a video on dividing 0 by 0 on multiple phone OS's! You will see IOS, Android, and Windows mobile
@Blackfromstickworld2 ай бұрын
Imagine if one of them said 0 or 1 💀
@JinWeiHii-ou1nk2 ай бұрын
For react os you did 2 to the power of 23
@vytah2 ай бұрын
It looks like the second click on x^y didn't register
@fbmrqs2 ай бұрын
On paper, 2 to the power of 2 to the power of 3 (big two, small two, even smaller three) results in 256 due to the right-associative property. It's clever that some developers take this into consideration in their approach. However, the linear notation 2^2^3 is not standardised and may be interpreted differently depending on the application. Some calculators provide the result for one operation at a time by default, which is useful for most daily scenarios where you need live results after each individual operation. In that case, the oldest operations are always treated as though they are in parentheses, so typing 2^2^3 would be equivalent to typing ((2^2)^3), which equals 64. For a bigger example, 2^2^2^2^2 would be analogous to ((((2^2)^2)^2)^2), and so on. Both interpretations are perfectly valid when they match the usual calculator behaviour. Obviously, none of this applies to the ReactOS calculator, which is just rubbish.
@inzaghiposumaalkahfi96502 ай бұрын
1:40 But now, the Calculator UI in Windows 10 looks more like in Windows 11, for the Latest Version.
@edwardcap7Ай бұрын
This is because they're updated independently from the OS, thanks to them being UWP-embedded apps from the Microsoft Store.
@harrisonrobins36892 ай бұрын
Now I'm wondering how different calculators react when the input is 0^0
@fluoriteByte2 ай бұрын
Undefined Error Syntax error Impossible operation
@bummered72772 ай бұрын
@@fluoriteByteor, 1
@fluoriteByte2 ай бұрын
@@bummered7277 yeah i haven't actually encountered a calculator that gives 0 or 1 for this lol
@alternatedenz2 ай бұрын
anything to the power of 0 is 1
@harrisonrobins36892 ай бұрын
@@alternatedenz Not if the base number is 0. My calculator would say "0⁰ is ambiguous"
@SourceEnginePlayer2 ай бұрын
theres this thing that a lot of people dont seem to understand when it comes to PEMDAS, or whatever you learned. The most common method to remember the order of operations is Parentheses, Exponents, ***Multiplication, ***Division, ***Addition, and last but not least ***Subtraction. When it comes to an equation such as: [2 raised to the power of the value "3 + 1"], you solve the exponent first, because it is a grouper, just like parentheses and nth-roots, or even floor/ceiling brackets. The term "Exponents" simply means to compute the _function_ that of exponents. And in order to do that, you *_must_* solve the equation in the exponent slot. Just like you must simplify the bit inside the root first before you can apply the function. And, personally, I don't like it being called PEMDAS. The E is much more like FUNCTIONS, (such as nth roots, exponents, floor/ceiling, and so on), And the P is alot more like GROUPERS, (the stuff _inside_ the functions). This would be GFMDAS, and thats a little bit hard to pronounce, so I understand instead calling it PEMDAS, especially when you first start learning it. One last thing before I go, equations like 2^2^3 and others that are purposefully obscure are the reason that people refuse to do math. It gets dumb, because there is more that one "right" answer. This is why instead of bicker about it, mathematicians made proper notation for it. Instead of writing "2^2^2", you use the superscript (the term for shrinking characters and bringing them up). Instead of doing 3+4/2, they put 3+4 as a numerator, and 2 as a denominator. In mathematics, we push the boundaries, we HAVE to make shit up as we go along. The whole reason that = exists at ALL is because they got tired of writing "is equivalent to". ***Note: It is unclear whether to do M/D from left to right and not (M first, then D), as well as A/S. this is also why you eventually stop using the division symbol, and just use the fraction notation, as to avoid confusion. For A/S, its usually from left to right.
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
Or you could just always use brackets whenever the order could be ambiguous
@Dillon-2022Ай бұрын
About a few calculators, 256 is the correct answer because every calculator think differently: With no parentheses, a few calculators stills says 256. How to solve: (2^3)=8 2^8=256.
@IzzumiPoshaf2 ай бұрын
9:20 Copilot in your Computer is still the Old one?
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
Windows 11 24H2
@YukiceNightcoreOfficialАй бұрын
Well if we do this on paper and not calculator, it should be 256. First, when doing exponents, we need to calculate from the top down, so 2^2^3=2^(2^3)=2^8=256. The calculator accepts the first two input and calculate it immediately, then add another input so it is actually calculating (2^2)^3=2^(2x3)=2^6=64 (don’t blame me if I got anything wrong😅)
@spawnnumber21262 ай бұрын
1:43 why does it look like windows 11 calculator? Or did they update it to be the same on windows 10?
@ThatRandomToast2 ай бұрын
It's updated via Microsoft Store, which can be considered updating independently from the OS
@yd59_yd2 ай бұрын
What happen if you run Logonui in explorer in windows? (when you lock your computer)
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnOuhKmsfNyAY68
@yd59_yd2 ай бұрын
@@World_of_OSes LogonUi to the desktop screen but nvm i will do this in a virtual machine ty anyway
@xdkristof2 ай бұрын
The correct answer is 256, because with power towers, you go from the top down. But most calculators don't give a poopoo about that rule and do (2^2)^3 which is 64 which is mathematically incorrect, unless you put brackets around the 2^2 to signify that you ARE supposed to work from the bottom up.
@VietnameseJokerTheZero2 ай бұрын
I thought that’s only with tetration.
@xdkristof2 ай бұрын
@@VietnameseJokerTheZero It's also for exponentiation. You learn something new every day.
@VietnameseJokerTheZero2 ай бұрын
@@xdkristof ok I’ll accept it cuz if i argue i will be an idiot cuz idiots often overestimate themselves, and i don’t want to be seen like that, also you seem like a very big nerd (try to take this “nerd” as a compliment cuz i can’t think of any other words) so i will accept it.
@xdkristof2 ай бұрын
@@VietnameseJokerTheZero aight lmao
@MuffinsAPlenty2 ай бұрын
@@xdkristof As with any potentially ambiguous notation, a decision has to be made. Would we prefer "a^b^c" to be interpreted as (a^b)^c or as a^(b^c)? It turns out that it is more useful for us to take the a^(b^c) interpretation. This is because (a^b)^c can be written in a different way: as a^(bc). However, a^(b^c) cannot be written in a simpler way. So if we want to have notational simplicity as much as possible, we should interpret "a^b^c" as a^(b^c).
@glennlouters4153-b3o16 күн бұрын
Everything is 64! But some of they're 256!
@trigonometrygenius2 ай бұрын
4:48 What the hell is “2^23”
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
Well in computers it is usually used as the XOR operation but it is usually used by humans to type exponents quickly like 2^8 instead of 2⁸
@zaneatat2 ай бұрын
This is why i ALWAYS use brackets, I don't trust my calculator to give me what i want
@MuffinsAPlenty2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for doing this!
@mateusdias16332 ай бұрын
Hi Stefan, I'm from Brazil. 🇧🇷 Btw nice video!
@CybernetonPL2 ай бұрын
my father figured in default windows calculator, 2+2*2 is 8, cuz it automatically calculates 2+2, then prints 4, and you keep typing the expression with 2*answer, which is 2*4
@kalinkavelinova25292 ай бұрын
This is like a game of SET! Three features: Color(red,green,black,yellow) Shape(heart,diamond,club,spade) Number(1,2,3,4) 1=ace Example:Ace of Red Clubs Four of Green Diamonds Three of Green Hearts Ace of Yellow Spades Two of Red Spades Four of Black Clubs Two of Black Diamonds
@Yehor-v7y21 күн бұрын
huh
@TheWatermelon699Ай бұрын
Bros hard drive is bigger than the biggest library
@HalcyonMeteor72Ай бұрын
If the exponential tower has multiple levels, the calculation starts from the right.
@williamthecoolboy2 ай бұрын
Aren't the Windows 10 and 11 calculators the same?
@SBETK2025SecondАй бұрын
hold+move is 23?
@teemce2 ай бұрын
In fact u can also "test" 2+2*2. When you typing into calculator string one by one it doest "look back". Kind of stupid video
@Yehor-v7y21 күн бұрын
Yes
@animatedstatue2 ай бұрын
ReactOS 💀
@marciapaulagoncalvespinhoАй бұрын
in fact why do calculators do 64 and others do 256 because those that calculated well 256 because they go from right to left now those that do 64 and old models do 64 because they go from left to right
@maxlad_yt2 ай бұрын
when there is no PEMDAS applied, go from left to right, meaning it should be (2^2)^3=64 as there are no parenthesis, this question could be improved by removing ambiguity and adding parenthesis
@rtxagent63032 ай бұрын
Order of operations states that you solve exponential towers from top to bottom. So 2^2^3 simplifies to 2^8 which equates to 256
@klonoaf13Ай бұрын
This is why I always use parentheses.
@SBETK2025SecondАй бұрын
why 2 ^ 2 ^ back 3 = 8?
@Sonic21Rus2 ай бұрын
Great video! So: 1. Some Linux calculators are good because they understand power chain rule as it should be. 2. Even Windows 11 calculator says it's 64. Let's hope Windows 12 will fix it. 3. Programming languages are good too in such expressions. 4. Special thanks to AI assistants for amazing answers about some calculators misunderstanding.
@muhammaddevandra99832 ай бұрын
Some people said that Win10 and 11 calculators already updated, so maybe this is already fixed, but idk, I didn’t tried it before.
@MatthewCenance2 ай бұрын
Why are the results different? It's basically multiplication, it's not supposed to be different based off what order you do it in.
@DavyB812 ай бұрын
Did you not learn about Order of Operations in school? Of course it matters what order a calculation is done in. Just read the AI responses, they explain it well enough.
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
Obviously it matters the order. How are YOU going to solve 6÷3(8+2) There are many wrong ways to solve it. You don't just make up your own order
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
With exponentiation it matter which way round you put the numbers. 2^3=8, but 3^2=9. With multiplication it doesn't matter about the order, 2*3=6, and 3*2=6. With addition the order also doesn't matter, 2+3=5, and 3+2=5. This is also why exponentiation has two opposites (log and root), but multiplication only has one (division), and addition also only has one opposite (subtraction)
@MatthewCenance2 ай бұрын
@@World_of_OSes Why does exponents change if you change the order of them but not multiplication?
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
@@MatthewCenance Tetration also changes, 2^^3=16, but 3^^2=27
@lukchem2 ай бұрын
Please also include the new Apple Calculator (iOS 18/iPadOS 18/macOS Sequoia or later). It now calculates 256. Edit: Since you are also including AI it would also be cool if you included different Siri/Apple Intelligence Versions. (Mainly iOS 18 or older; iOS 18.1 and iOS 18.2 or later). Maybe even include the old google assistant.
@edwardcap7Ай бұрын
He can't do that, sadly. His PC is just too outdated to run macOS Sequoia anyway.
@gengar-19972 күн бұрын
2^2^3 equals both 64 and 256 at the same time, it's just a matter how you interpret the math problem
@FocusLRHAP2 ай бұрын
Can you do highest factorials on calculators?
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5XMioptmbudfZI
@francescomelchiorre75572 ай бұрын
Can you do the same thing but try to do the square root of -1 ?
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5jGhZubmsySpaM
@francescomelchiorre7557Ай бұрын
@World_of_OSes thank you
@heracleumsosnowskyi2 ай бұрын
What happens if you 6*9+6+9 on calculatirs
@rtxagent63032 ай бұрын
It’s equal to 13^2 - 100
@EdMatthewMorales2 ай бұрын
4:53 you did 2^23 instead of 2^2^3
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
I clicked the ^ button, but it didn't register.
@Dillon-202214 күн бұрын
Is it 64 or 256?
@asheep77972 ай бұрын
Do 2^2^2 for more consensus. (the only outlier would be if they say 4194304)
@reizinhodojogo39562 ай бұрын
there are 2 ways the calculators solved this: 1. as its a power tower, it solved 2^(2^3) which is 2^8 = 256 2. as it solved at the same time the user typed the inputs, it did (2^2)^3 whi h is 4^3 = 64
@greenstillplays491319 күн бұрын
Make a mac calculator .exe file please and send me the Google Drive link
next up: what happens if you 0th root on different calculators
@Johnvids-g3o2 ай бұрын
2^2^3 is 256 beacause it's rightmost exponet first so: 2^(2^(3)) --> 2^(8) --> 256
@douggale59622 ай бұрын
256 is correct, but most of these don't even claim to do order of operations. It's like complaining that 2 + 3 * 4 = 20
@BoyAnMinhTrump2 ай бұрын
Windows: WTF 2^2^3 = 256?!? No! Linux: No, 2^2^3 = 256, not 64!
@TheWagonroast2 ай бұрын
Doing 2^(2^3) is the right way though, right? That’s how tetrations are calculated, which is why 2⇈5 is ~10¹⁹⁰⁰⁰ instead of 65536
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
Correct
@emikosh2015Ай бұрын
2^2^3 is P1 was 64, P2 was 256
@emikosh2015Ай бұрын
ReactOS is the only one who got INCORRECT
@DogesArePros2 ай бұрын
2^23 and 2^3 for react os (errors)
@thecyanlife2 ай бұрын
so.. what's the correct answer?
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
7:38
@AX_-2 ай бұрын
256
@steve_15072 ай бұрын
It depends on the order in which the result is calculated. If I do it im my head, I get 64
@erikkonstas2 ай бұрын
In languages that have a power operator it's right to left, so 256.
@thecyanlife2 ай бұрын
@@World_of_OSes i see! when just doing 2^2^3 i got 256 but when i do 2^2 then 4^3 ( (2^2)^3 ) i got 64 so it depends, the correct way according to chatgpt is 2^(2^3) but reactos doesn't support multiple "to the power of" so it did 2^23 instead of 2^2^3
@55037-r2 ай бұрын
Now try calculating triple factorial of 3
@TheYarikishere10 күн бұрын
2^ (first) 2^ (second) 3 is equal to 64
@Odswietny2 ай бұрын
256 (Samsung Calculator)
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
5:28
@Odswietny2 ай бұрын
@@World_of_OSesI did it on One UI 5.1.
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
@@OdswietnyLol samsung is wrong
@FRKNGDN2 ай бұрын
did you notice the rad and the deg on the video??
@NebulisuzerАй бұрын
rad - radians deg - degrees
@Paulo-c3n2 ай бұрын
reactOS calculator is tweaking 💀
@solomoncyj2 ай бұрын
you forgot wolframalpha and desmos
@fjvnsphones20252 ай бұрын
VIVO ANDROID CALCULATOR: 2^2^3=256
@jackncharliefy2 ай бұрын
It’s either 64 or 256.
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
Wow very helpful FYI it's 256
@samanthajean2292 ай бұрын
Worlfram alpha: you what?
@honor_gamer2 ай бұрын
ReactOS Calculator seems interesting on 2²³ is that ReactOS Calculator can do once not twice. Samsung Android Calculator made me laugh, without braskets is now scientific. A Python indeed ** equal as ^, what an new discover... A fair enough of ChatGPT. (Some Calculators i don't comment besides, they're kinda getting similar like Python and/or JavaSript, so yeah)
@duplicake40542 ай бұрын
Yes!!! GNOME calculator got it right! Take that KDE
@TheYarikishere10 күн бұрын
2^2=4, 2^2^2=4^2=16, 2^2^2^2=4^2^2=16^2=256
@TheYarikishere10 күн бұрын
2^2^2^2^2=4^2^2^2=16^2^2=256^2=Big number 256^256^256=φ∞1(an big number that we cannot calculate)
@TheYarikishere10 күн бұрын
φ∞10=5.28819328e3 232 323 φ∞100=1.82993180923e628 819 322 φ∞1 000=1.72833019ee12.88 φ∞1 b=7.88x 10^10^10^32.22 φω1=giant number that we cannot calculate but only these φ∞ (φ∞33.2 b) φω10=φ∞172.2 De φω1 b=φ∞10^^383 φω1 De=φ∞10^^^28.8 φω1 Ce=φ∞10{3 200 000}10 φΩ1=φω2 Ce
@TheYarikishere10 күн бұрын
φΩ10=φω1.024DDeDu φΩ100=φω8.192NoNgSxg φΩ232=φω11.11OcDeOcg (Maximum limit of Unsigned 1 024 bit integer number) φΩ1 b=φω10^^250 φΩ3.333 b=φω10^^10^10 (Signed 2^32 bit integer number)
@lucifergamingfr7180Ай бұрын
The correct answer of 2^2^3 is 256 You havn't tried that operation in physical calculators
@LemonPlaysAmongUsАй бұрын
I’m in 3rd grade, I just learned 3^4
@naga_serpentis2 ай бұрын
I'm here! :3
@Ulti_bfdifan19 күн бұрын
Tetration be like: ⁴4=4^4^4^4=4^4^256=4^4 billion= ????
@4rxino2 ай бұрын
256 mine
@natthanonknot29742 ай бұрын
I'm quadriple unlucky becauce of 4 ads
@Meme-my-pebble-ShortsАй бұрын
Yessir
@kalinkavelinova25292 ай бұрын
2^2^3=64 Windows XP knows the right answer!
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
LMAOOO ur stupid asf It's 256 ask your math teacher
@Hlorovodorod_official2 ай бұрын
256...
@Carlang29Ай бұрын
update gave me calculator for some reason
@สุรดาสรศักดิ์-ง9ต29 күн бұрын
2^2^3=64
@CantEscape1.4M2 ай бұрын
it's 256
@isaacsamuelsson9885Ай бұрын
2^2^3=64 2^(2^(3=256
@liamsstuff_12 ай бұрын
I am the 2,312sd person to watch this video!
@wingmansfuryАй бұрын
16^2=256
@symaski62Ай бұрын
ok google steets :) 256=2^2^3 ok 256(2^2^3) not () 64=(2^2)^3 ok 256=2^(2^3) not () ty calculator
@TinyLiamMichael2 ай бұрын
2^2^3=256
@it_is_i.mp42 ай бұрын
2^2^3
@NebulisuzerАй бұрын
256
@penguincute35642 ай бұрын
DUDE STOP DOING (2^2)^3
@swisse2132 ай бұрын
2^2^3=3
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
Lol did you use XOR operatir
@swisse2132 ай бұрын
@@bitonic589 C++
@saletefernandes-wn1gv6 күн бұрын
(2^2)^3=64😂😂😂😂😂😂
@callmehaardicАй бұрын
i got 81😭
@edwardcap7Ай бұрын
How?
@JustBlack4Ай бұрын
2^2^3=256 i autocorrect
@Xirtenh993eGYh122 ай бұрын
Who's with 64 gang?! 🙌
@bitonic5892 ай бұрын
Anyone who hasn't learned repeated exponents yet. You're wrong. This is an established math law, repeated operations are done right to left
@BehruzZoirov-if5kw2 ай бұрын
explanation (2^2)^3 = 64 And 2^2^3 = 256 😅😅😅😅
@World_of_OSes2 ай бұрын
2^2^3 = 2^(2^3)
@BehruzZoirov-if5kw2 ай бұрын
in fact, all types of calculators are working, you are calculating two types of things
@teemce2 ай бұрын
@@BehruzZoirov-if5kwthis. You typing one by one not whole string