What if China was united and joined the Allies in 1936? - HOI4 Timelapse

In this scenario we test out if a United Democratic China can beat the Axis, Comintern and the Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.
AI: Historical
Remember these videos are not meant to offend anyone and there for entertainment.
Main Channel: ‪@EreoGaming‬
Discord: discord.ereo.co...

[@a12475]

Alternative title: Italy becomes useful ally

[@dersven4122]

It would be interesting to know the stats of majors at the end, I liked big Italy in this one.

[@Brneyt]

I totallt agreeé_

[@Frontline_view_kaiser]

So USSR just shrugged and surrendered despite holding Kazan, Astrakhan, Stalingrad, Gorky and Syktyvkar. In any normal game USSR will still have 5-10% surrender progress left after Vladivostok and Stalingrad falls and here they just quit with no movement on the Frontline...?

[@notmysteriousthief4629]

Well, AI can use agencies, the Germans could've had a collaboration government. There was movement on the frontline. They had lost Stalingrad before losing Vladivostok. Losing both Stalingrad and Vladivostok combined with a collaboration government leads me to believe that they surrendered about as expected.

[@Frontline_view_kaiser]

@@notmysteriousthief4629 That never happens though. The AI does not execute operations

[@kristof6472]

How does that make sense

[@juaneldesconocido2186]

1.United China is worse than Chinese United Front 2.UK used his NAVY and resources in Chinese-Japanese war and got invaded by Third Reich

[@wernhervonkerman2382]

it doesn't

[@guncolony]

UK deployed its fleet to help China, Japan blew much of it up, so Germany sealioned and won WW2. Not actually that surprising tbh

[@orrorsaness5942]

@@guncolonyseems legit

[@rittyrizzani5705]

YO, ITALIAN CALIFORNIA 11:25 BOTTOM TEXT

[@user-wg5pg8di1x]

(X) Doubt

[@whyy9383]

How the UK get packed up so quick?

[@dmitriblyat8237]

True ending

[@michball9704]

it would make axis win

[@cainballer9745]

Gross, how dare you put Tibet in China! 🤬

[@electrogaming6090]

because it was literally a part of the qing dynasty

[@Tangerine9407]

*西藏省

[@cainballer9745]

@@Tangerine9407 Tianeman Square 1989