What if the Costa Concordia sank in deeper water?

[@aidianajones]

It would have costa lot more lives.

[@quietcarselijah]

ha

[@maisievaldenarro7510]

"Worst times to say dad jokes"

[@Aden-y7g]

@aidianajones this is the worst time to make dad jokes here

[@evonekky3672]

Too soon 😂😂😂😂

[@RockyRacoon5]

Lmao

[@GlamorousTitanic21]

She almost did. One of the few things that Schettino did right was changing course with what little control he still had to beach her on the shallow rock ledge.

[@maisievaldenarro7510]

What is it he or she?

[@mercury7396]

@@maisievaldenarro7510 ships are typically referred to as female

[@nian60]

@@maisievaldenarro7510 In English, ships are called "she". (Yes it's dumb, it's a machine = an it, but it is what it is).

[@Cameragaming483]

I am you but sunken

[@leeblack6139]

The steering was stuck in the last position inputted by the helmsman prior to the power failure. That, along with the current and a prevailing wind that night, shoved Concordia back to the shallows.

[@carlmaster9690]

It is with animations like this that make you realise how, despite being gigantic vehicles, ships are still tiny and insignificant their size becomes when they sink into the vast ocean around them!

[@oldi184]

Yeah, but why? Why oceans are so deep?

[@sigisoltau6073]

​@@oldi184Well, the oceans lie on oceanic crust. There are two types of crust, continental and oceanic crust. Continental crust is made of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock and has an average density of about 2.7 tons per cubic meter.. Oceanic crust is made of igneous rock, primarily basalt, and has a density of 2.9 tons per cubic meter. This means that because oceanic crust is denser than conventional crust, it lies deeper, and the oceans fill these deeper basins.

[@didgereemedia194]

She was terrifyingly close to completely sinking. I believe the ledge she landed on was only just above the deeper water

[@StephanvonHabsburg-Lothringen]

yes she drifted out on the open ocean bc her engines failed only because of luck the wind blew her back to shallow waters else she would have sunk quickly

[@eyesofnight]

@@StephanvonHabsburg-Lothringenluck? Or chuck Norris?

[@fraskf6765]

​@@eyesofnightreally nice to see that this chuck norris meme is still alive, even after 15 years

[@hgbbccchcccvvb8226]

​@@fraskf6765 only because Chuck norris let it live...

[@osasunaitor]

​@@StephanvonHabsburg-Lothringen no, the Costa Concordia was not on the open ocean at any time. The accident happened near the Italian coast, because the negligent captain Schettino wanted to get as close as possible to the shore to show off. That's why he struck some shallow rocks and wrecked.

[@CarbonPizax29]

So many more people would've died, if this happened the Costs Concordia incident could've been nearly as famous as Titanic.

[@doctorbohr1585]

Except the captain wouldn't have gone down with the ship.

[@anthonyhewis5083]

It wouldn't. Many ships have sunk after Titanic with more loss of life. Titanic stands out because it was regarded as hubris (unsinkable triumph over nature etc). Plus the division of the classes in terms of who survived. More first class men survived than third class women.

[@doctorbohr1585]

@@anthonyhewis5083 actually, I think there have been only three or four peacetime shipwrecks with higher loss of life. But I'm pretty sure they were all hideously overloaded third world ferries whose owners flagrantly disregarded laws (they were kind of accidents waiting to happen). The Titanic remains one of the worst shipwrecks of all time. The Titanic remains legendary not because of numbers alone, as you've said. It was the unsinkable ship and maiden voyage factors, the cast of famous people, and the romance of the Birkenhead drill, etc.

[@Icetea-2000]

@@anthonyhewis5083???? That right here is blatant misinformation. 175 first class men were on board, of which 57 were saved. 165 third class women were on board, of which 76 were saved. You can look all of this up easily, the victim lists are very thoroughly researched. In comparison by the way, of the 144 first class women 140 survived and of the 462 third class men 75 survived, a survival rate of only 16%. And it was even worse for second class men, a survival rate of only 8%, while their second class women counterparts had a survival rate of 86%.

[@Icetea-2000]

@@anthonyhewis5083​​⁠???? That is complete misinformation. 175 first class men were on board, of which 57 were saved. 165 third class women were on board, of which 76 were saved. You can look all of this up easily, the victim lists are very thoroughly researched.

[@johnstjohn1987]

"But the Ship cant Sink!" "Shes made of Iron i assure you she can. "

[@nickpereira4047]

It is a mathematical certainty. XX

[@mvol5973]

@@nickpereira4047 Well, I believe you may get your headlines Mr Ismay

[@jeffreyrodriguez7298]

Aluminium for costa

[@shaynewheeler9249]

Titanic

[@BabaSaft069]

​@@jeffreyrodriguez7298Steel

[@taras3702]

If she sank in deep water, most aboard would never have even reached the weather decks before drowning in their cabins or below decks. Water would have rapidly flooded passenger areas, engineering spaces from above as well as though the breaches in the hull. Even worse those who jumped into the water would find water surging into the ship through windows, down stairwells, the funnel, ventilation and elevator shafts a deadly menace. When Titanic sank, scores of people in the water were sucked down into the ship and drowned. The funnels left 25-foot wide holes into which water swirled, pulling people all the way down into the boiler rooms. It would have been no different if Costa Concordia sank in deep water. I think also the ship would have broken apart if it took an extreme downward angle by the bow. Large open areas in the decks inside are where stresses converge, and cracks start radiating from. In fifteen seconds or less, they can break a ship into two or more pieces while on the surface or just below it.

[@meadowsproductions981]

New fear unlocked omfg that's terrifying 😭

[@alypanama8067]

@@meadowsproductions981a man on titanic almost got sucked into the grand staircase

[@binary1045]

...sucked into the boiler rooms?

[@Mminneaux]

@@binary1045the funnels were ventilation for the boiler rooms; the shafts they were attached to ran all the way down to the bottom of the ship

[@edwineriksson2882]

It was lucky that she didn't sink in a particularly deep place, because then it would have been much more difficult to salvege her up to the surfece. Of course, I wish it had never happened in the first place.

[@colestock9980]

Would have definitely been easily preventable with good captain-helmsman communication.

[@MenteMaestra91]

She? Did you just assume the ships gender? Bigot!

[@DemocraticRepublicofEgg]

I actually requested this video to be made, and oh my gosh! IT WAS! THANK YOU SO MUCH MAN! JUST SUBSCRIBED!

[@anthonyviteri5037]

I think I read somewhere some years ago that if the wind had been blowing in the opposite direction that night it would have.

[@AmicusAdastra]

I was in that ship that night when it happened and if she would have sank in deeper water not only me and half of the passengers would be on the water due to the left side of the ship couldn’t put in water life boats but also there would have been so many more death, me included.

[@jeroenboth167]

I’m glad you and many others survived due to it not sinking in too deep waters 🙏

[@MUSIC.AI22j]

Keep dreaming

[@WHITELOTUSLINE]

Fake

[@fredflintstone5356]

I am surprised how quick it went down compared to the titanic. How long was it from the impact until the ship was on its side? I know the titanic took around 3 hours but sunk evenly until last min.

[@AmicusAdastra]

@@WHITELOTUSLINE person 1: **share a story only** 12 years old online: "FaKe 🤓"

[@JC-39428]

The only inaccuracy in this video is that the Costa Concorda had a starboard list before settling, not a port list. Other than that, the animation was great, and the creator is very talented.

[@LexLucario7922]

That's because she shifted to starboard when she went on the rocks. If she had stayed in open ocean she would've sank port.

[@nathanhudson-young2460]

​@@LexLucario7922And the wind was blowing against the port side causing it to pretty much act like a sail.

[@shaynewheeler9249]

Titanic

[@dannys942]

I had a class mate named Costa, he was a total A-Hole the depth to which he was willing to sink is unimaginable!

[@gdragonstan]

Definitely, if the Costa Concordia sank in deeper water, more passengers would have died. Thankfully, it wasn't too far from the shore. Human error caused 33 lives to be lost after the ship struck rocks off the coast of Giglio Island.💔

[@evonekky3672]

I have been waiting for you to make this video. Thank you !

[@gamer07208]

Sinking ship animations never go without these sound effects 😂

[@Beep_beep-pl7rd]

One thing I think would have happened on the costa Concordia is due to the fact that the gash was closer to stern I think that the bow would have risen a little and than capsizing stern first like the ms Estonia Edit: the Concordia had a starboard list due to the winds but I understand if you took that out of the picture

[@maxproracing-j4f]

This animation is so freaking cool

[@thomasackerman5399]

If the water is deep enough, the ship will most likely roll over and or just right itself, so long as the heavy machinery in the engine spaces is sufficiently heavier than the superstructure sufficiently enough to do so in time before impact.

[@EchaOmega]

interesting thought and perspective love the video

[@Jungletraveler00_12]

That's eerie

[@jhonnijay4311]

Hello Caljucotcas

[@caljucotcas]

hello

[@averyandaxel00]

So cool I love your videos so so much

[@JaydenBelieves]

So basically Poseidon without the wave

[@ArnavKhode]

Nice animation!

[@BNuts]

Have _Costa Concordia_ and _Titanic_ switch places, and so many more aboard _Costa Concordia_ would have died, and the ship would have been lost for many years while salvagers attempted to find her. Meanwhile, more people would have been saved from _Titanic_ due to the ability to use the lifeboats to ferry passengers to the shore. Even if _Costa Concordia_ and _Lusitania_ or _Britannic_ swapped placed, more people would have died on _Costa Concordia_ . Simply starting the evacuation as soon as Engineering declared the ship 'lost' would have saved so many people, perhaps everyone. Unfortunately, Schettino remained in denial for far too long, and over 30 people paid the price with their lives.

[@tplus3017]

In deeper water? Such as that of the Titanic or Lusitania? Like the Titanic she would plain away and seeing that her superstructure is so high I would say a majority of it would be ripped away as she sank to the bottom.

[@danijelujcic8644]

Lusitania (and Britannic) hit the bottom while their sterns were still above the water. Can't say much about physics of a ship like Concordia fully sinking, though. Except that I'm sure there would be at least some implosions.

[@surferbri5346]

What would cause it to sink like this, if the water was this deep, it wouldnt have anything to scrape on

[@ACE_1923]

Literally if the wind was blowing west instead of east that night it would have been enough for the ship to capsize into the deeper part of the ocean and not sit on a reef

[@TheNotRealLargeMagellanicCloud]

Can u make "if carpathia sunk just like the titanic"?

[@caljucotcas]

Yes! I will make it one day

[@Muazmikail333]

Can u make MH370 landing on water at subrise and sinking animation??@@caljucotcas

[@Anthemoftheseas2894]

Can you make icon of the seas sink like costa Concordia

[@ronadelacruz9675]

It wrecked like MS Estonia and sinks like HMHS Britannic

[@brunorossibonin788]

How the chimney didnt collapse on its on weight?

[@tescoclubcard2022]

Because they weren’t constructed like the titanics funnels, titanics funnels were just thin sheets of metal which would weaken if pressure was sufficient enough etc when it sank.

[@ScottyIsHim]

I'd rather not think about it. It's a very terrifying thought. 💀

[@kneckno8356]

So glad the ship came back in 2024

[@romansaustraliaart]

NOTE: Costa Concordia is sunk in 2012, restabilized in 2013 and scrapping in 2015-2017

[@Anthemoftheseas2894]

Can you make icon of the seas sink like costa Concordia

[@YungVeasna-ws2yu]

Can you do " What if Concordia never sank "

[@ronadelacruz9675]

Costa Concordia will sail forever and meet Costa Concordia will be scrapped in 2037

[@Orodaran]

Well, to know just look at any other cruise ship of the Costa fleet

[@kurtisknechtel3728]

Just pause it at 0:01 and you're good

[@TJusnow]

It almost did. It was on a rock cliff.

[@Sh4dow682]

amazing how nothing is breaking off it as it goes down the water column

[@dr.rodders3329]

Are there any actual CRUISE ship wrecks on the sea floor?

[@JackRabbittm]

Beaching her on the coast was probably the only thing that Captain Schettino did right. It probably did save a lot of lives.

[@Sakshiydvv]

please show the sinking of cordelia cruise ( The Empress ) tne Indian ship .

[@Archie-s5n]

(sorry) Why there's a big cube under the sea???

[@The_Landmark_Shorts]

It just sank like Poseidon 1:34

[@NanobanaKinako]

Now, can you do if Titanic sunk in shallow water.

[@Ghoulstards]

Considering she sank because she hit a rock formation, I'm guessing that if she was in deeper waters then she wouldn't have sunk.

[@saratogawestern8027]

this reminds me of the sinking of the ms sea diamond

[@kinetsievarvenfloot1237]

How deep is the water in this simulation?

[@geigertec5921]

What if the Titanic hit a rock in shallow water off the coast of a highly populated Italian island? Would Mr. Guggenheim and Captain Smith still have gone down with the ship, even if it just sank a little.

[@Nico_6967]

Didn’t it sink to the right?

[@caljucotcas]

Damage was on the other side, look the graphs on internet, how it turned back while drifting

[@caljucotcas]

atlas-bleu.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/P42-03-Collision-Costa-C-V2-1.jpg

[@arena2menace]

i wonder if the water slides would get taken away from the ship as it sank

[@Miakel]

The captain let it drift to shore before running out the anchor. About the only correct decision the guy actually made.

[@caljucotcas]

Yupp!

[@SuperNovaJinckUFO]

This is like "what if the Titanic sunk in warmer water?" XD

[@Archie-s5n]

Why ther's a biig cube under the sea??

[@ConsiqueCommue]

ESTIMATED DEATH COUNT [If This Was Real] - 900-3.2K

[@IdkNewYears]

Estimated*

[@laislabella]

I see that ship and i think, how beautiful she was... really is so sad that happen.

[@somethingfromnothing8428]

Would it have gone down on its side like that? On big ships like that isnt there pumps etc to distribute the flooding to keep them level while they go down to make evacuating passengers easier? Im sure even titanic and ships of that era had it so surely in deep water it wouldnt of capsized that quickly

[@barneystinson6638]

I dont advocate for this in any way, but the wreck would truly be a sight to explore

[@Dwight_]

Thinking the same thing. A small city on the bottem of the ocean would be crazy too think of

[@sandrafowler6717]

There were reports that the Captain went missing and couldn't be found on board and that he never went down with the ship.

[@-Katastrophe]

Ironically it probably wouldn't have sunk if it was in deeper water

[@owenleeming1836]

It’s scary seeing a massive ship get swallowed up by the ocean

[@countlessgerick2301]

Pov poseidon but with no tsunami

[@Damien-Chapman]

hard to think if they didnt issue that last tiller command this coulda happened

[@msd6110]

Isto sim é o que aconteceria se o Costa Concórdia não tivesse sido empurrado pelos ventos até a costa da ilha Giglio na hora do naufrágio

[@TaeSunWoo]

Oh look, more nightmare fuel

[@connorredshaw5650]

The death toll would have been far greater if she had sank in deeper waters.

[@filip36365]

I remember when this was on the news and my dad was just ripping on the captain for abandoning the ship and being one of the first to flee instead of being one of the last ones out. "Typical wop" hed say while laughing 😂

[@skorpion090]

Awsome 😎 probably couldn't have happend tho cuz she hit a rock

[@LexLucario7922]

It definitely could have, the ship was adrift after the collision, but luck was on the passengers side. The wind blew the ship back to shore and the ship ran aground.

[@ocean_liners1910]

she would capasize like the sewol ferry did but not fast like poseidon

[@m4e4xamo]

Schettino took the route to stockholm

[@Stairdancer202]

i thought the same. It would be an Estonia 2.0 with maybe a bit more time to sink and better weather to command rescue operations.

[@johnrobertoloroso4246]

Costa concordia Sinking Deep Backward Like From Poseidon.

[@tcorns62]

One mistake in real life Costa Concordia listed over to the starboard side not the port side

[@caljucotcas]

Nope, honestly you dont know how it happened, damage was on the other side Check this out : atlas-bleu.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/P42-03-Collision-Costa-C-V2-1.jpg

[@davidchodds]

The whole reason it sank was because it was close to shore and the ship bottomed out on rocks, causing the damage. Thus, if it had been in deeper water, the damage would've never occurred and this whole point is null.

[@marcorizzoni9766]

30 seconds after the collision, the primary engines (that power the rudder and the propulsion) were gone offline, and the ship was moved only by the wind and currents of the sea. LUCKILY they pushed the ship towards the shore, but the ship touched the sea floor only something like 30 minutes after the collision (it was close to the coast, but not close enough and the wind and currents were still nearly parallel to the coastline, so it took time to get to a shallow enough zone). If the wind had pushed the ship AWAY from the coast, things would have gone very differently.

[@yournanship5893]

Go figure i just watched all of that to learn that it would indeed have sunk

[@nicholasmaude6906]

A ship that size would've taken a lot longer to sink and not only would it have capsized it's quite possible it would've rolled over before sinking which would've led to a huge loss of life.

[@cjthemaritimecraftsman879]

Well, It could have been more catastrophic than Titanic.

[@Indoraptor_play]

Nothing changes, it would've had been raised, but now just from underwater and scrapped.

[@diegonaranjogelbert]

No dramatic splitting? James Cameron dislikes this video

[@EduardGenardAndalis]

Expecting like the way that Titanic sank? No way!

[@milenasurmova5530]

Im hate the capitan. Passagers leaves first and enginners and other then capitan leaves last but the capitan was dumb that he didnt know how to drive so he hit rock and saved only his self

[@przemekandrus4221]

How many people will się on this catastrophe?

[@MasterBritannicJess]

What if carpathia sunk the night that Titanic sunk

[@Jorek19]

then it would sank deeper😂

[@primergoalhorns04]

What if Titanic sank in 1915, instead of the Lusitania.

[@alanalovell1612]

there are numerous factors as to why The Titanic is such a famous sinking. Same reason why people wont let go of The death of Selena- random comparison I know.

[@MasterBritannicJess]

What if Britannic sunk deeper water.

[@doctor_uno]

What if the Titanic struck the iceberg head on?

[@sp1n4l_sn4p]

it would take largest passenger ship wreckage from britannic

[@NormalITFTfan]

If that actually happened more people would be dead

[@ErenTopcu]

Less than 500 meters

[@philippebaeza5912]

Quand on pense que le capitaine avait abandonné son navire et était parti en catimini du paquebot ! 🤦

[@vidurbehari3270]

She would have surpassed TITANIC...😢

[@itamac7853]

she wouldn't sink, there was no rocks to hit 😂

[@caljucotcas]

You are wrong, she was hit near coast, and she headed to the open sea, and then they noticed that they are taking in water, and they turned back near coast.

[@Foebane72]

It's not a good design at all if the lifeboats go underwater BEFORE the upper cabin decks!

[@jwwprod3862]

To think this happened on Friday the 13th..................

[@legiran9564]

The bodycount would have been in the thousands. Nobody would remember Titanic anymore.

[@tinypoolmodelshipyard]

Legends never die. Titanic has been upshown on death toll since its sinking but its story survives as its biblical in proportions and events that tell a human tale of hubris. Titanic would be fine but the Costa Concordia would have etched her name on that same mantle

[@PulseXP-yo8wu]

@@tinypoolmodelshipyardWilhem Gustoff had a death toll higher than Titanic, Empress Of Island, Lusitania and Britannic put together

[@mercury7396]

@@PulseXP-yo8wu even if you put Dona Paz with Titanic, Empress of Ireland (not island), Lusitania, and Britannic, Wilhelm Gustloff (not Wilhem Gustoff) would still have more 9600 > 8149

[@1940limited]

@@PulseXP-yo8wu Wilhelm Gustloff was an act of war same as Lusitania and Britannic. Titanic was a peacetime disaster.

[@byronthomas153]

0:57

[@timothyknight2236]

What if the Costa Concordia sank in deeper water? - Thats easy to figure out - in sinks deeper.........

[@Sh4dow682]

well if it was in deeper water then it wouldnt have hit anything so in turn wouldnt sink..

[@caljucotcas]

Hey, take a look at this, she headed to the open sea, in last minute she turned back atlas-bleu.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/P42-03-Collision-Costa-C-V2-1.jpg

[@HateBlueySaveHeresTRUW]

Symphony Of The Seas: Hello Britannic!

[@Anthemoftheseas2894]

Symphony of the seas: where britannic

[@HateBlueySaveHeresTRUW]

@@Anthemoftheseas2894 The Video:

[@1940limited]

Do you think it would land that gently on the ocean floor? Not one lifeboat launched? Funny.

[@jamesking5571]

More lives would be LOST