Thanks , as a visual person I used to find this hard to visualise!
@rajanvk93918 күн бұрын
Wow just awesome
@alejndraalmirowitsch4897Ай бұрын
that rotation part is super useful
@purplrshadowyay11 ай бұрын
Or to put it more simply If i = √-1, then i² = (√-1)² = -1
@stewartmoore5158Ай бұрын
That's putting it more concisely, not simply. You have to do a lot more abstract thinking to understand this set of expressions than the visual guide provided in the short.
@gerdsfargen6687 Жыл бұрын
Man this dude is my Maths god!
@Azooooooooooooz Жыл бұрын
Maths? maybe Allaah (God)? no.
@tornadoruby Жыл бұрын
@@Azoooooooooooozplease don't bring up religions because people are gonna start a war
@DEVILSWARNING11 ай бұрын
@@tornadoruby yea bro these people are very annoying
@fsponj7 ай бұрын
Proof that this dude is a god?
@Kirmadada2Ай бұрын
@@tornadorubythese muslims cant this out of the box out of religion 😂.
@channel1238113 сағат бұрын
🎉🎉🎉
@ionelmiu9218 ай бұрын
A complex number is more than representing points in x-y plane. If you only need to represent a point in x-y plane , you don't need imaginary part; enough to have real x and real y axis and, voila, you can represent all the points.
@c0d3r1f1c3 ай бұрын
Yes, but a complex number can be produced by a single function. To describe a 2d output without complex numbers, you need to define 2 functions: one for x and the other for y.
@suvarthagollamandala81014 ай бұрын
Thank you Sir
@pinedelgado4743 Жыл бұрын
Awesome stuff!!
@ketanmorajker Жыл бұрын
That was nice 😮
@WANEL Жыл бұрын
Sqr root of 2 is 1.41 and if sqr root of -4 is 2 cuz sqr cant be negative then sqr root of 1 and -1 is just a bit smaller my house is not 9m and squar of 2 wide but 9 times 1.41
@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 Жыл бұрын
Excuse me, you speak about rotation. Why? Complex numbers are supposed to be points but you treat as if they are vectors. Also, can you graph an equation containing imaginary numbers and show it?
@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 Жыл бұрын
@Paulancar Can you prove that i^0=1? It's an arbitrary convention, right? Can you explain why in all graphs we see the imaginary unit i depicted with same length as the real axis unit? Finally, find the error in the following: -1=i^2=i*i=sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1)=sqrt((-1)*(-1))=sqrt(1)=1.
@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 Жыл бұрын
@Paulancar Hey buddy. I would appreciate a reply since you appeared so sure on the complex plane.
@natalia5609 Жыл бұрын
@@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 the "sqrt[(-1)*(-1)=sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1)" is the error . The identity √(ab)= √a√b holds true only for real numbers, where as in complex number you won't get the same result in LHS and RHS of the identity
@natalia5609 Жыл бұрын
@@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 And yes i can prove i^0=1 We know i/i =1 (but i by i can be written as i^(1-1) as they have the same base and they are undergoing division) So i^(1-1)=1 => i^0=1 Hence proved
@natalia5609 Жыл бұрын
Actually numbers are really fun to play with , one of the reason i love maths