Gotta be honest. You taught this better than my grad professor
@allthesecontinents2 ай бұрын
Pure gold! What a content! I am fascinated by Skinner's work, which pushed me towards behavior analysis, and as an amateur, I am trying to find my way in it. This is the third video I have watched on your channel, and I am extremely grateful and excited because they have helped me understand certain key aspects of measuring behavior in a simple way. Thank you once again! Incredible work!
@PsychExplained2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I appreciate the kind words. Behaviorism is an old school perspective that still holds relevancy today. Good luck in your studying!
@fitsumredwan37302 жыл бұрын
love it. You have articulated this incredibly! Good job. keep it coming.
@sachin_badgali282 жыл бұрын
Sir you saved me from my professor otherwise he will give me zero pls make all the research related topic videos you are the best sir 🥺🥺🖤 Love from India
@PsychExplained2 жыл бұрын
Happy to help Love from Chicago, IL USA
@larry58722 жыл бұрын
YOu rocked my learning of operational definitions. Thank you very much (your name here) for your excellent job.
@PsychExplained2 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help! (Steven Kushner)
@oguz91482 жыл бұрын
wow just excellent explanation. I got the topic
@adashofmadness64553 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this video. It's very informative. :D
@salqaurooj48993 ай бұрын
Thank you soo much you explained in an awesome way
@PsychExplained3 ай бұрын
You're most welcome
@lukebalane90242 ай бұрын
Nice, dude. That was spot on-what a coincidence. You ended with the very words I am dealing with in my study-emotions and intelligence. Great teacher! I love your other video on variables, too!!
@PsychExplained2 ай бұрын
Glad it helped!
@lukebalane90242 ай бұрын
@@PsychExplained Indeed, you explained the concepts with humor, simplicity, and sensitivity to your audience - an artist.
@DavidAndrewsPEC2 жыл бұрын
Operational definition of intelligence: Define in terms of what an intelligent behaviour looks like- - based on rational thought - engaged in purposefully - effective on the environment For example: • aiming a gun at a target and squeezing the trigger only when the sight is locked on the target (intelligent) • aiming a gun toward a target but not keeping the sight locked on the target before squeezing the trigger (non-intelligent) • differentiation I from NI: count of shots within a certain radius from the bullseye in the target This is essentially what intelligence tests do: they count behaviour to measure consistency of behaviour across several tasks in order to determine the likelihood that the person being tested behaved intelligently during testing. IQ does not indicate how clever one is: it indicates how consistent one is. Higher consistency means higher probability that examinee's behaviour during testing fulfilled the definition (due to Wechsler) above.
@kousinarayan Жыл бұрын
Great explanation, Thank you so much
@PsychExplained Жыл бұрын
You are welcome!
@gurinderjitsingh88332 жыл бұрын
🙏 Thanks Sir for such a great video.
@merciadios51132 жыл бұрын
WOW YOU ARE HELLA AWESOME!! THANK U SO MUCH
@PsychExplained2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching 🧠 🧠 🧠
@shannonbroughton7327 ай бұрын
This entire video helped me better understand how to write my literature review. THANK YOU!!!!👍
@PsychExplained7 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@kallobarb60872 жыл бұрын
Perfectly explained.
@PsychExplained2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@SonuSOnu-mv1bh2 жыл бұрын
Really informative ❤️ thanku
@almf777 Жыл бұрын
Wouldn't 19 be included since it ends in teen?
@sharonayouabian692211 ай бұрын
thank you
@PsychExplained11 ай бұрын
You’re welcome 😇
@hananelouanjli7472 Жыл бұрын
Very Fruitful. From where do you buy your pens, please? I badly need them
@PsychExplained Жыл бұрын
Expo markers are the best :)
@calsavestheworld7 ай бұрын
He has very good penmanship.
@tracknfieldtingz36067 ай бұрын
How would this be applicable to an extended literature? What would be the approach?
@PsychExplained6 ай бұрын
Can you explain?
@umairkhokhar22784 ай бұрын
paper in half an hour, taught me stuff in 20 minutes clearly than i couldnt learn in 2 years
@PsychExplained3 жыл бұрын
Check your understanding: Which of the following represents an operational definition of happiness? A. The feeling of a strong emotion, such as pleasure or joy B. Counting the number of smiles people make C. Feeling satisfied with your life D. Showing gratitude E. Experiencing more positive feelings than negative
@adashofmadness64553 жыл бұрын
B?
@nabilamarfa12243 жыл бұрын
B?
@yieldandovercome3 жыл бұрын
B
@ariegonzalez48072 жыл бұрын
B
@vaheltynerard2 жыл бұрын
B
@oweedanewton7366 Жыл бұрын
Do you have a workbook or pdf with numerous practice examples to gain an understanding of creating operational definitions? I will gladly purchase a tutorial tool from you! I’m truly lost 😞 and my professor has moved on.
@PsychExplained Жыл бұрын
Not yet! I will work on it :)
@ngokelcho78632 жыл бұрын
thank you so much, but in a survey research , how can it be measurable
@PsychExplained2 жыл бұрын
Great question. What are your variables?
@ngokelcho78632 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExplained2. What is the students’ feedback to cad courses in university? feedback/response measurable=survey(satisfaction1-5scale and open-ended questions), but what is observable? 3. How do labor markets affect students’ learning choice about cad software? learning choice measurable=survey to see what kind of software they will learn and how, but what is observable? i was confusing with this for almost one week. still didn't figure it out
@Ariana_VT2 жыл бұрын
Did this video include any operational definitions, or was it just talking about how to make one without providing an example of one?
@PsychExplained2 жыл бұрын
In this video I explain what are operational definitions by using a social media example.
@Ariana_VT2 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExplained Thank you. Operational definitions have been hard for me to grasp. From your and other videos, this is what I've come up with. I would greatly appreciative if you would please correct me if I've misunderstood anything: Hypothesis: The desire to be reunited increases as time apart from a significant other increases. Predictor Variable: Time apart. Criterion Variable: Desire to be reunited. Operational Definition: For this study, time apart means the duration of separation of significant others. The desire to be reunited means to want to be able to physically interact with their significant other. Participants self-reported their belief that the desire to be reunited grows stronger as time apart increases by answering yes or no.
@stevenkushner83482 жыл бұрын
@@Ariana_VT Great stuff! Love the study. Few thoughts: 1. Be specific on "time apart". For example, longer than 2 years? 5 years? 6 months? 2. What do you mean by significant others? Friends? Relationships? Family members? 3. Rather than "yes/no", I would create a Likert scale - "On a scale of 1-10, how much do you desire/miss your significant other after time apart". Somehow you need to quantify "desire".
@Ariana_VT2 жыл бұрын
@@stevenkushner8348 Thank you for the feedback! I'll definitely incorporate it all. Regarding 3, I was confusing correlational with qualitative (but yes / no is closed-ended so it wouldn't even be qualitative)... I also need to write this study using the experimental method wherein I decided to use a 1-5 scale instead of yes or no because I was confusing experimental with quantitative. My goal was to have both be quantitative. Thank you so much for the help! I feel much better about all of this now!
@lindangcwangu2933 Жыл бұрын
but 19 ends in "teen"
@arianapowell8370 Жыл бұрын
Rip 19 lol
@PsychExplained9 ай бұрын
Related videos: Experimental design: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnW6lX1_lL2Hac0si=RSGnVN82TxGLvRtp Independent variables and Dependent variables: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZOxXqyjeJuqac0si=NXWlApUGvPAKUBuh