What is reality? String theory & multiverse visualized

[@tectzas]

Awe shucks ☺️ I'm glad you're in this universe too Arvin!

[@martiddy]

Or is he? *Plays Vsauce music*

[@mesunmesun224]

You already went.

[@abhijithns6477]

Beat me to it .

[@profile1157]

@Impilo yempilo lol

[@VeNoM0619]

I'm a simple man, I see a video questioning reality, I click it.

[@darthjarjarbinkstherealsit6832]

@Phil Weatherley Mesa simple Gungan

[@Shinku_no_sanbun]

@daveyboy9000 He's simply complex.

[@Neo-n9k]

Love how he goes on so slowly as if teaching a kid. This is a tough subject that needs people like him to teach it to the general

[@ripdoxyyy]

just found this channel...feel as if it's severely underrated.

[@richardwalker6004]

Yes it’s a really great channel and very informative.... I’m glad I found and it and you did too

[@jz7079]

100%! just as good as PBS space time but less math and easier to understand.

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

Ya he's pretty awsome!

[@thebodyofabeautifulmind766]

I've solved infinity

[@NaveenKumar-wn7op]

And this is also an underrated comment

[@mr.nonamanadus4463]

True nature of reality is that I have to go to work today.

[@JohnVKaravitis]

Your boss wouldn't describe what you do as "work." FYI.

[@Daniel-yo5es]

perhaps this channel is not appropriate for you.

[@markcoleman8236]

That human reality. Not reality. That's governments reality.

[@dougyates7218]

Not all of us, some of us are retired:).

[@bruhbruhbruhbruh12]

then i guess i dont want to be real

[@robertschlesinger1342]

Another great video, Arvin. The idea of multiverse, bubble, budding, or baby universes surely would have caused quite a stir a generation ago. I recall the resistance to Everett's Many-Worlds Interpretation of QM during the 70's and 80's, even with the support of Wheeler and DeWitt. I even recall some notable physicists, such as Alfred Lande, still resisting QM. Lande, then at Ohio State, sent me autographed copies of his books on E&M and QM (attempting to explain it classically), Well, we love your videos and look forward to more.

[@ArvinAsh]

Hello friends. I will be on the live chat for the first two hours of the video premiere from 2pm to 4pm NY time, this Friday. I look forward to chatting live about your comments and questions!

[@deedilgee]

Ok sir.

[@noahway13]

Call and remind me.

[@liavofra]

Hopefully you can address my comments on the speed of Light. There is no argument about the speed that fluctuates between psychical mediums, But for example, you assume that the speed of light near Alpha Centauri is greater than the speed of light on Earth. what I'm saying is you're just assuming it, we don't know about that right, do we? The facts are that we cannot know what is going on everywhere in the universe, so we cannot determine that the speed of light (electromagnetic wave speed) is constant! We can assume different possibilities, (just like we assuming that it is constant), what if light is emitted from someplace near us. maybe it emitted from the center of the earth. and maybe is emitted from life. maybe there is million more possibility? maybe after you laugh for a few seconds you will maybe realize that this is not a completely unbelievable idea as it can dismiss some paradoxes in Quantum Physics.

[@dakrontu]

To person with name in unrecognised script: Before suggesting speed of light is variable or that it emanates from inside the Earth or from life, learn some Physics. You will be able to answer a lot of your questions that way, and realise the inconsistency of some of your ideas.

[@liavofra]

@@dakrontu funny, you talking like we know already everything. arrogant is a disease And science is not dogma! Love and Light

[@IIoveasl10]

I love physics. Never learnt it, but love it....thru internet. And my hero is Albert Einstein.. I do not understand most of what the age of 55, I am fascinated by physics and the universe, that interested me since I am a kid. Thanks for the videos. David

[@TheFox517]

Never even attempted "learning" it in school either. You can actually learn way more through the internet if you put some time into it. School is only there to mass-produce obedient factory workers (which we don't need anymore and it's exactly why it fails). They make everything look so boring and difficult, when in reality, any person with a brain could grasp most of this stuff. - Sincerely, a kid who learned a whole-ass language through KZbin and taught themselves how to draw by doodling during class.

[@IIoveasl10]

As I said, never learnt physics in class....philosophy: yes, but in the university. I was intrigued by it. Languages, I was good at. I learnt French English and Hebrew and sign language for the three languages. I worked with deaf mute kids and adults, so I had too. For physics, I always loved the universe, so physics helps. Thanks for your answer. David

[@bulentkulkuloglu]

_COVID-19 Industries_ incest is a relatively recent sin. It’s universal ban among human societies is 2 thousand years old. And cousin marriage is not considered incest in most non-christian societies until recently. In the last 50 years or so, influence of west caused cousin sex to be incest globally. In the Rome brother sister sex and even marriage was common. In ancient Geeece, since children just like the wife, was considered a material possesion of men, most men would entertain themselves with both male and female offsprings freely. In ancient Egypt, phorahs would mostly marry their mothers, sisters and daughters. There were ones that married their sister, had six daughters, and married them also. There were ones that married their mother after father died, and then married the offsprings from that marriage. Luckyly for human kind, Babilonians were the first to make laws to explicitly forbid incest. And it took a lot of harsh punishment to stop people from doing this. But it took hold and spread to the rest of the old world from Near East. Today’s norms are more healthy and better for society, but never judge someone who lived many years ago with the ethical standards of today.

[@bulentkulkuloglu]

Lalrivunga Hnamte, we accumulate some bad mutations in our genes as we age. Some of which will be repeesented eventually in spermia. Thus, recombination with distant genes are better to produce offsprings. If a bad mutation occured, it will get more and more amplified with each successive generation, so much so that by the sixth generation or so, you are almost 100% certain that the offsprings will have serious phyisical and mental handicapes. People distant from each other also at times have such offsprings. But this random bad luck has a low probability. In some extreme cases, if the person had relatively low bad mutations, and some extremely high quality in some dimensions, such as intelligence, you may theoretically get, one or two generation of high quality generations. But it is doomed to fall apart beyond that. Thus, even the best of starts of inbreeding is doomed to fall apart. Thus, it should not be permissible to reproduce with close kin.

[@jayross6588]

Keep up the good stuff Arvin, your content is amazing. I swear you should have your own show on the Science Channel. Your choice of topics and the way you narrate is phenomenal, I feel like you put things in much better context than even the big boys. I salute you kind sir!

[@dennisnordlund902]

Your channel is great, arvin. Really love your videos. I’ve studied physics for about a decade, on a amateur level, and subsecuently watched loads of videos on youtube and yours are surely some of the best, if not the best!

[@jeancorriveau8686]

Yes. Arvin's videos are easy to grasp. They caught my attention.

[@ahpstudiostamil]

Dear brothers and sisters, I made an effort and have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity" based on real dimensions of space-time. You shall check my work, in which the path(quantum orbits) of the fundamental particle are waves giving shape to the particles as strings. Also, you will see the curled up dimensions in my articles. I have tabulated total no. of dimensions required for theory of everything. "New study of Gravitation and Fundamental theory of Singularity" [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - ARC JOURNALS - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. Hope this new study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics. Theory of everything is not an easy task, as gravitation is nothing but a path to singularity. Gravitation is not a wave at any point of space-time, as it is believed to be in existing researches. I have shown to run along the axis of the detected waves or ripples and terminating in singularity. Moreover, as far as I worked, universally gravitation is only used to channel the forces for creation and destruction by nature....thank you

[@mannygutierrez7654]

I like that, despite your reservations, you still discuss the plausibility of string theory. Keep making these videos man!

[@rickevans7941]

Sir, thank you again for your gift to humanity. Your succinct and clear explanations of complex topics are a boon to us all.

[@cedricveinstein6949]

Arvin Ash, Nick Lucid and Don Lincoln are the 3 science head honchos in KZbin who has the ability/patience/interest to convey complex topics to us "less physics savvy"

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks my friend. But I'm humbled to be put in the same sentence as Don Lincoln. He is amazing.

[@theobserver9131]

@@ArvinAsh Finally! Someone (you) put this all together in a way I can almost grasp!

[@ArvinAsh]

@@theobserver9131 Great! Glad to hear it my friend. Science is for everyone, not just nerds like me.

[@dan1204hc]

Try Eugine Physics Videos. The explanations are slow. He even repeats sentences sometimes. It is mindblowing.

[@cedricveinstein6949]

@@dan1204hc thx for the tip, I will check it out.

[@nikielxxx8786]

I have to admit that you describe very difficult things in very clear and simlpe way... It is a pleasure to listen you. Kind regards Konrad

[@Zombieboss2002]

Very thought provoking. Sometimes I like to imagine some superior being watching us scramble for answers, and thinking to themselves "Yea they're probably going to take a lot longer than I thought".

[@GordLamb]

Carl Sagan was my hero. I can't adequately express how glad I am that people like you are with us to carry the torch of sharing the wonder of science.

[@ArvinAsh]

He was my hero too! Gone way too soon.

[@robertoneill1979]

Reality, this and every moment, is a gift. That's why it's called 'the present' ❤

[@karagi101]

BBB H What a super asinine comment... Something one would expect from a Troll. Though... I suppose I do appreciate the intent was to make the Troll feel superior. Cheers.

[@martiddy]

@DontMaskTruth Is the same in spanish

[@tonyrock5313]

There are no moments. The universe is not pixelated.

[@b3at2]

you dropped your crown king...here you go 👑

[@chrisf1600]

@7:27 "Now imagine the loops being a more complex shape, like a Calabi-Yau manifold". Thanks, I was struggling a bit but that made it much clearer :)

[@sidgar1]

Q: Is the cat alive or dead? A: Yes.

[@ArvinAsh]

Glad you said, "alive OR dead" not "alive AND dead."

[@StarCoreSE]

More like the cat has X% chances to be Alice when de check.

[@imgonnagogetthepapersgetth8347]

If it wandered into Chinatown, it would most certainly be dead.

[@rustymoore1346]

Imgonnagogetthepapers getthepapers Im willing to bet I speak for more than just myself when I tell you we’d appreciate it if you kept your 10 year-late attempts to be funny, in your head. These people trying to wake the world up there’s no room here for that garbage, racism’s played out Schrodinger’s all the rage.

[@davec.6456]

'Yes' is a very Zen answer. I like it!

[@MasonClay]

This guy has a great personality. Great clarity, tone and pace.

[@unorthodoxphilosopher]

please answer this question: can we ever have anything that is truly 2 dimensional? A piece of paper is NOT 2d... is 2D even possible? Thanks

[@ArvinAsh]

Ahhhhh, yes...Fantastic question! That happens to be the subject of our next video!!

[@GP-qb9hi]

Yeah, for example a shadow.

[@tesla_tower]

Yes, our vision

[@aksvan]

And for example if a wall was 2d, could we walk through it?

[@HarryHeck2020]

Why would atoms be 3D? They are just a manifestation of forces and particles. There is nothing solid in there. It is all just vibrations, multi-dimensional harmonics.

[@rocco9128]

I really enjoyed this one! It really makes one think! So many possibilities. I don’t know if we will ever be able to understand, or know, everything...but it’s fun and exciting to keep trying to figure it out! Plus, throughout history people have had a tendency to miss the bigger picture, if you will. For example, people used to think the Earth was the center of the universe! Now look! You have an amazing way of not only explaining difficult topics but making them interesting! Please don’t stop!

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks my friend. Yes, first everything revolved around the earth. Then everything revolved around the sun. Then everything revolved around a central mass of the Milky Way. Now we learn the universe might be infinite, and this pale blue rock is in an obscure corner of an ordinary galaxy among trillions of others. We are even more insignificant that we could have thought. Thanks for watching.

[@stevenw4549]

I saw recent research that says the earth is the center of the universe.

[@ahpstudiostamil]

Dear brothers and sisters, I made an effort and have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity" based on real dimensions of space-time. You shall check my work, in which the path(quantum orbits) of the fundamental particle are waves giving shape to the particles as strings. Also, you will see the curled up dimensions in my articles. I have tabulated total no. of dimensions required for theory of everything. "New study of Gravitation and Fundamental theory of Singularity" [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - ARC JOURNALS - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. Hope this new study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics. Theory of everything is not an easy task, as gravitation is nothing but a path to singularity. Gravitation is not a wave at any point of space-time, as it is believed to be in existing researches. I have shown to run along the axis of the detected waves or ripples and terminating in singularity. Moreover, as far as I worked, universally gravitation is only used to channel the forces for creation and destruction by nature....thank you

[@morbo1049]

Well presented and articulated. Thanks for the hard work you put into the episodes.

[@szellemsam]

You made me smile with that last line. I totally wasn't expecting it, man

[@CommodoreFloopjack78]

This kind of stuff is absolutely fascinating.

[@pocho3881]

Try shrooms

[@cymbal_slasher2x924]

I really like this guy. Learned something and he makes you feel good at the end.

[@GururajBN]

I’m fascinated by the narrator and the narration. You deliver your talks so smoothly without any hemming and hawing! The topic itself sounds so mysterious. Thanks for imparting this knowledge.👍 Can you also please explain what are Bosons and Fermions, and why the discovery of Higgs Boson caused huge sensation?

[@RS-pu9ti]

Arvin Ash, you need to put a statutory warning that your videos are sure shot addictive.i viewed a couple of your videos and now I anxiously wait for new releases. Way to go 👌

[@theb166-er3]

We have a lot of theories about "the" everything. The problem is a lot of them are like this one.

[@raghu45]

Yeah! At the end of minute 1, Ash displays "complex theories made simple" or some such, but by the end Ash seemed as vague as anyone else 😄.

[@blazemkds]

The theory of everything is Consciousness and that's it. That's why Science hasn't come up with this theory and it will never understand consciousness, because all science is based on objectivity and you can't objectify, measure or "see" consciousness. The Ancients actually knew far more about it than us, which explains their immensely complex architecture and societal structure, relationship with nature, and understanding of higher entities and dimensions. Consciousness is "God" and we are all it, its the driving force for every experience an entity can have anywhere in existence (any dimensions). I mean you're spawning an entire Universe right now and yet humans think they are meaningless. Our Ancient brothers knew there was FAR more to it. Science is looking in all the wrong places.

[@kyrlics6515]

Just find the commonalities between the theories and do what ifs on them to see where it goes. Like eliminating specific notions and attempting to replace it with another one owo

[@theb166-er3]

@@blazemkds ++ I think the human brain is capable of quantum computing. We predict the future. I admire the ancient wisdom. And I believe there is a lot to learn from them and from each other. My theory is that human consciousness is fractal-like (your life and all other people's lives all their acts and all our thoughts even language itself.). That is why we organise (visual) information fractalvise. And it has something to do with evolution I think it is the pattern of our family trees. And all other creatures family trees. (I hope this makes sense at all)

[@WoodyStickman]

I just found your channel a few weeks ago and am continually more impressed. Your thought conveyance and rhetoric is easy to follow and understand. 💯👍💥 Keep them coming!

[@Ice-Fall]

I dream in a multi-verse reality, but have yet to crossover.

[@aclearlight]

Beautiful and inspiring work as always, and given with a generosity of spirit which shines with a truly unique light.

[@mohamedaz6694]

the density of the information compressed in this 11 mint video could create a black hole 🙌🤝

[@ArvinAsh]

Lol. Yes, there is a lot to unpack in this isn't it?

[@mohamedaz6694]

yes sir 💯🙌🙌

[@beri4138]

Maybe this is video is the accretion disk of a black hole

[@BaldingClamydia]

Lately there seems to be a trend of KZbinrs putting a sweet/inspirational message at the end of their videos. I like it. I'm glad you're here too, sir. 👍

[@jodeg205]

I like how this guy try’s to put it all together

[@paraiso1972]

I'm happy you explained this simply. Now I'm still very confused, but on a much higher level. Thanks.

[@glass7923]

finally I'm not late for something in my life

[@glass7923]

what

[@visheshvaleja7546]

You are too early because after 70-80 years we would become a multi planetery species but you won't be there to feel space😉

[@lovepeaceisneverguaranteed7385]

So what?

[@AnthonyHirsch]

Kano there’s a TON you’re not too late for. Building Artificial General Intelligence and Superintelligence, humans going to Mars, (most likely imo) finding alien life, and a lot of other stuff. We live in exciting times. there’s still a lot to do and discover.

[@Engineeringuncovered]

Kano we are at the dawn of true human civilization

[@The_Revealer_7]

Thank you for explaining complex and fascinating scientific subjects in a way that is easy to understand. 👍

[@skeel_8923]

11:06 I'm glad that you are in this universe too, otherwise I would be really confised.

[@madhavijaveri7921]

Officially declared best vedio of arvin ash

[@condorvitch_2011]

Really looking forward to this Arvin,and my offer of pints of Guinness in Dublin still stands if you are ever over this neck of the woods!

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks my friend. It is a fantasy of mine to visit Ireland - beautiful country! I will certainly let you know.

[@chriskaplan6109]

Thank you for your engaging, understandable, and enjoyable videos Arvin! Love your content!

[@mattiefee]

The first thing that came to mind when he said there are 19 constants is The Emerald Tablets of Thoth that states 19 are the dimensions within dimensions.

[@spackle9999]

Thanks for opening that rabbit hole, friend.

[@Bebolife12345]

Provide citation please.

[@merlpriester]

What a great person t explain things. You are so inviting.

[@banba317]

I love how this ends on the Mr. Rodgers note.

[@ArvinAsh]

Fred Rogers...wish he was still around. Be sure to check out the Neflix movie about him.

[@ogpd4898]

40 trillion dollars in Monopoly money haha I understood that reference

[@bigcaptainschannel]

I am not a scientist or a phycist. However, since childhood, I have visualized a multiverse. For me, I visualize a multiverse as like cells to a larger body. Arvin Ash I really enjoy watching your educational videos. You really explain things well. I am 72 years old and really enjoy learning.

[@ArvinAsh]

Great to have you Sir! Welcome aboard.

[@rob5918]

I don't know about string theory, it gives me bad vibes.

[@prodbysway]

A Nonny Mouse u a mouse 🐁 ur always having bad vibes

[@blitzy3244]

X-izor 🐁

[@baruchben-david4196]

Makes me high strung...

[@Waltham1892]

String theory makes me feel a-frayed...

[@Waltham1892]

@Steven bent1 I feel a little unraveled myself...

[@ilkinshafiyev2314]

I haven't even noticed how Arvin's channel became my favourite on KZbin.

[@gurupai629]

This is the best science channel right now.

[@StaticBlaster]

The multiverse hypothesis is a more intellectually invigorating idea than any supernatural or religious concept.

[@beammeupscotty3074]

Alvin Ash you do really good work !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@Steve.909]

I'm gonna' need to watch this more than once... 🧐

[@dizzle7558]

Glad you're in it as well Arvin..This was a great video and my favorite by you so far💪🔥💯

[@Recrush]

Arvin you are genius. Thank you so much for providing such information for curious people like me. I just came across your channel and couldn't resist myself from watching your videos back to back even when I am not a physics student. Thank you again.

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks my friend. My videos are really not meant for physics students, but for anyone that is curious and has a scientific mindset. Welcome and thanks for watching.

[@johnoldman3042]

Totally underrated channel! Keep up the good work! Thanks!

[@markcoleman8236]

Sure we are made of atoms, and other cells but how does all of that added together exactly make us alive? Mind blowing.

[@hansturpyn5455]

Yes it is

[@systemicchaos3921]

Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood

[@markcoleman8236]

@@systemicchaos3921 prob

[@stellar7760]

And precisely how do all of these atoms just *know* how to add together in the absolute correct order/group? There’s certainly a remarkable intelligence behind it all, in my opinion.

[@markcoleman8236]

@@stellar7760 indeed. Like how do these cells know when and how to interact with each other? It's coded into them. There is a creator, has to be. But it's not a perfect creation.

[@vladbcom]

You are a gifted educator and I'm glad I find myself in the same universe.

[@ArvinAsh]

We are in a parallel universe together my friend. Thanks for watching.

[@mathematicalninja2756]

Reality is highly dependent on observation, so who first observed the universe into existence (if this is even a correct question)

[@ArvinAsh]

It is not dependent on conscious observation. I have several videos on this.

[@scottshamp9300]

It is manifesting slowly, collectively, like intelligent aliens

[@gombaobariokpa1352]

I agree with you mathematical ninja. The universe only exists because someone observed...(I don't know what to say next. Lol)

[@stevenw4549]

@@scottshamp9300 The big bang was not slow.

[@stevenw4549]

The first would be God as he created it.

[@troybingham6426]

The subtitles weren't necessary. This fellow is perfectly easy to understand.

[@ArvinAsh]

You can turn the CC off anytime on youtube. It is for our international viewers.

[@internalchaos]

If we do live in a multiverse then how was a multiverse created and if we continue down this line of reasoning how do we deal with the infinite regress that comes along with it.

[@ArvinAsh]

That's a really good question. I would think though that the multiverse idea is where the regress stops.

[@erik-ic3tp]

@@ArvinAsh, And what if the regress continues?

[@GhostInPajamas]

I gotta think there's some higher power involved. I'm not religious at all but my idea of "God" would be some higher dimensional being, or maybe the universe itself is a conscious, super cosmic entity. I just think that since something exists rather than nothing, there's gotta be something that caused it. If the multiverse is real, then why is that the way shit works? Are there more multiverses inside a megaverse? And so on....

[@erik-ic3tp]

@@GhostInPajamas, this God? Link: verse-and-dimensions.fandom.com/wiki/Creator

[@markcoleman8236]

@@GhostInPajamas makes sense of a creator. I just don't understand how the universe could create itself. They sat it's 14 billions years old but why 14 billion? Why didn't the big bang happen trillions of years before?

[@ZanMoonMilki]

I have this amazing theory : - What if ringularities are 2D wormhole's mouth inside Black Holes. - Spinning Black Holes can twist space-time like a water vortex, the mouth of the vortex is ringularity, the surface of water is 3D space,the length of that vortex hole is 4D, all of that create wormhole. - The ringularity of a Black Hole is the singularity but have shape like a 2D ring because of Black Hole momentum and gravity, a point couldn't spin. And that "ring" could be the mouth of the wormhole inside Black Hole. - Black hole more massive = wormhole from A to B will be shorter because black holes gravity will bend and try to pull the distance of space from A to B in 4D world closer together. The 4D world is very complicated for us to fully understand. The 4D is always around us but it was hidden so we can't see,feel it or even measure it. Understand higher dimensions could be the key to fully understand the universe and even the big bang+multiverse. *One more thing : i think the ringularity could actually be 3D singularity (spherical singularity) because wormholes are 4D things, the mouth of wormholes have to be a sphere because 3D are planes of 4D.

[@tig79rover91]

only thing i could understand was banging black hole, so i liked ur comment:)

[@Monsterclip101]

Were gonna die one day, we’ve got nothing to lose. Leave no room for regret, spend every second doing what you want.

[@vinayseth1114]

And sometimes what you must.

[@cynthiaayers7696]

And that's why they arrest people.😅😅

[@Monsterclip101]

Cynthia Ayers why you gotta think my insightful moment dang it hahahah

[@kaisoonjoe5514]

Because "freedom" isn't "free".

[@cuttingedgetint1250]

There would be "chaos" god forbid we act natural.

[@danniles5256]

Great channel.Lots of interesting information.Thanks Arvin Ash.

[@JohannY2]

For the first time in now know what string theory is all about.

[@dheerajpandey4152]

M ur huge fan sir... U r awesone keep growing 😊

[@g0lbez]

I just got into your channel and i appreciate your vast knowledge and ability to explain it coherently! but how do you keep from going insane with this kind of knowledge?? I feel the more I understand about our reality the more detached and surreal it gets

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks for the high praise my friend. What I enjoy most is communicating this knowledge as best I can to people who may not have understood it before, or to those who don't particularly like science. This passion keeps me from going insane.

[@Mosern1977]

Our brain was not invented to ponder these questions. Many of the greatest scientist are borderline crazy for a reason.

[@eyeyosef]

............... Another great video about physics...

[@planetoftheatheists6858]

I thought Deepak Chopra figured all this stuff out years ago. “Happiness is a continuation of happening which are not restricted” Sounds legit

[@ArvinAsh]

Haha. Our old friend Dr. Chopra is still spreading bad science unfortunately.

[@beri4138]

Deepak Chopra is not a scientist

[@mauijttewaal]

Great video, but String theory is 'not even wrong'. Trying to explain 19 numbers by introducing 7 extra dimensions, very neat.

[@aminalizadeh9752]

With the huge number of variations, living in such a peaceful planet is somehow strange.

[@luminoustorus548]

and it only gets stranger

[@beri4138]

Anthropic principle

[@ProactiveForce]

Great observations and discussion. We'll done! Thank you

[@DanielSmith-bg9lf]

I love this stuff.

[@peterpan629]

Wonderful episode. Thanks for sharing👍

[@ICantEven2It]

Me: oh cool i’m early. *sees comments from 2 days ago.* Me: oh.

[@timemachineoutput]

From A Time Machine Somewhere When dissolving reality atomically o copy and past é for sharing actual visible www.scribd.com/document/436555937/visible-then

[@workinprogress9613]

so... momentary excitement until "reality" set in?

[@bleach4052]

Me: I'm late like this person *sees your comment from 2 days ago* Me: OOOOF

[@thomasteksumkleven5463]

And you my friend, are extremely underrated. Keep doing you!

[@gwwayner]

It would be nice to know the true nature of reality and existence before we die!

[@ArvinAsh]

Indeed it would.

[@HarryHeck2020]

I would love to see fusion power and reversed ageing before I die.

[@Datokah]

Some truly mindblowing concepts there. Great video!

[@John-100]

It's all a bunch of probability wave packets where all outcomes can be possible

[@wardrcaviation6132]

Sounds Spot on

[@ethorii]

But only one is probable. I think.

[@davidford694]

I don't know about you, but my reality is much more tied into my feelings, thoughts, and relationships than it is to lifeless matter. Calling this stuff a theory of everything is hubris on a breathtaking scale.

[@VuNguyen-mh4oo]

arvin ash makes life easier for me, don lincoln is great too, ad well as science asylum(nick lucid) it used to be isaac asimov and carl sagan

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks my friend. I'm humbled. I miss Asimov and the great Carl Sagan. Wish they were still around. I've read almost all of Asimov's books.

[@karagi101]

Arvin Ash My all-time favorite author! Got me fascinated with science as a kid and went on to become an engineer.

[@CadmusCurtis]

Brain. Melted. Awesome video as usualy

[@neutrino3869]

The truth is- We need a Physics Sherlock to reveal all of that mystery once and for all.

[@รlเ]

You never would be as we live in constant state of hyperillusionalrealism so two things are interwind in such complex way its hard to ever tell why one force exist for others & tho we are able to understand the reality part what we see perceive on day to day life but free radicals too are ever most important part of life which we fail to see & these free radicals are actually makers or breakers of anything which are real as these free radicals are worked upon by supercosmic theory of gods universe (infidominosurrealeffects)

[@tig79rover91]

@MBOYA Ogutu could u please be more specific?

[@harshitsrivastava7700]

the best KZbin channel present

[@Exso-one]

Reality is an electron looking for somewhere to rest.

[@swapnilkurve4677]

That's same thing i thinking

[@pic6ture]

Arn’t we all?

[@jt2097]

You mean looking for an 'ome to go to?

[@richardbaroff4911]

Very cogent and helpful. Thanks Arvin.

[@petejefferson2]

The answer to everything is 42.

[@mesunmesun224]

Read more books.

[@danielrvt]

I always look forward to your videos

[@Lanr1s]

the true reality is happening in hong kong right now

[@รlเ]

Its xhinese controlled barbarism but its gonna too have a surreal effects on its imperialist powers

[@Lanr1s]

@@รlเ i hope so

[@รlเ]

@@Lanr1s just see history bro you would know 😀

[@Lanr1s]

@@รlเ i know history and i hope communism dies once again

[@รlเ]

@@Lanr1s bad communism will surely be finished wether they are zeds or feds but good part will remain to save the world

[@StevenFrankgg]

The rug analogy you use was really helpful for understanding extra dimensions.

[@ArvinAsh]

I'm glad you found it helpful! Many other books and videos use the rope-from-far-away analogy, which I had always found to be not very useful.

[@illusions77]

My wife sees way more dimensions than I do.

[@ArvinAsh]

I hear that for a lot of couples. Wish I could explain why. lol

[@timemachineoutput]

femininity to faint globally o that's vISiBle then..... when..... From..... A Time Machine Somewhere When dissolving reality atomically o copy and past é for sharing actual visible www.scribd.com/document/436555937/visible-then

[@timemachineoutput]

@@ArvinAsh Paco's magiC shoe is dissolving reality atomically and explains why all of femininity can faint globally if o my goodness that's vISiBle what do we did From A Time Machine Somewhere When printouT dissolving reality atomically o my goodness and copy and past é for sharing actual visible www.scribd.com/document/436555937/visible-then

[@timemachineoutput]

@Anderson Mendes know is the superstition of money inside the wallet as well does your bank have superstition of money is the problem global just a second and explains why all of femininity can faint globally if o my goodness that's vISiBle what do we did From A Time Machine Somewhere When printouT dissolving reality atomically o my goodness copy and past é for sharing actual visible www.scribd.com/document/436555937/visible-then as the superstition of money dissolves globally o my goodness that's vISiBle

[@idimitrov7]

Inspirational!.. Thank you very much!

[@bxdanny]

Equations won't answer a question like "What is reality?" That's a philosophical question, not a question of physics.

[@ArvinAsh]

Not sure it is necessarily philosophical. Philosophy appears to enter the picture whenever science can't answer something completely. These equations have answered a lot already. There is no reason to think we can't go further to explain it fully.

[@bxdanny]

Well, science (physics in particular) used to be known as "natural philosophy". So there really is a connection there, that I think we have forgotten about to our detriment. But even if science does fully answer the "what", it can't answer the "why" (and it acknowledges that).

[@PhysicsHack]

Best. Yet. Genius of communication. Thank you!!

[@ArvinAsh]

Thanks my friend. And thanks for watching.

[@kylelewis6603]

Just don't let Thanos snap his fingers.

[@ArvinAsh]

Haha, yes absolutely not. We've got too much to live for!

[@Sidewalker1553]

Wow, well done Arvin. 2 videos in and just wow.

[@28KKaann]

7:34 tripping on acid you can see this dimensions on the floor 😂😂😂

[@TheLazyMoney]

Kaan T Fact

[@PestOnYT]

My take on the "missing" dimension is that they are not to be interpreted as dimensions but as properties of that given point in spacetime. Meaning each point in space has values for the electromagnetic field, temperature, curvature of spacetime, the strength of the known forces etc. So, they are not other dimensions in the sens of x,y,z. Moreover, you could curl anything in 3D it is still part of 3D no matter how close you'll get.

[@i.k.6356]

The M Theory is unfortunately trivial. It is equal to randomness, and this is equal to reasonness, i.e. it doesn't give an answer and it is a nice mathematical game...

[@ArvinAsh]

I would not have disagreed with you because on the surface it may appear this way. But the way it models our known reality and the way its predictions fit our observations is astounding. So it should not be discounted.

[@HarryHeck2020]

I like the description of Quantum Field Theory. It just seems more realistic, plausible. I envision a field for each particle and maybe some that science is not considering.

[@beri4138]

@@HarryHeck2020 QFT is great, but it has the huge problem of being incompatible with gravity and thus incapable of fully describing our universe.

[@HarryHeck2020]

@@beri4138 It's not incompatible, it just hasn't been quantized yet. When you scale it up there are contradictions with General Relativity. Needless to say both theories need to be adjusted by factors that we don't yet understand.

[@beri4138]

@@HarryHeck2020 Maybe string theory has the complete description of reality. Deciphering the shape of the 6 extra dimensions will likely take centuries though.

[@ceebee491]

There are some people who don't think of this kinda stuff...it fascinates me!

[@Hitngan]

But we're living in a Virtual Reality so it's obviously been designed.

[@dk-nj3je]

Indeed, "the reality" seems to be simulation.

[@peteq1972]

Tom Campbell

[@Hitngan]

Musk thinks we're likely to be 7 VRs deep from Base Reality. 7 being a prominent number in this VR.

[@kyjo72682]

define virtual

[@Hitngan]

@@kyjo72682 None material, there is no solid matter. Consciousness collapses the wave function to create particles, atoms. Without consciousness there is only limitless potential in a sea of vibrations.

[@LynnColorado]

Thought Provoking Video and looking forward to your Fine Tuning Video.