Very appreciative when you explain some of these special terms various philosophers use.
@ibrahimkorkmazdemirsoy2 жыл бұрын
That sweater looks so good on you, my man, holy moly
@skylarjon34642 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this one! Very interesting concept
@Phlabberghost2 жыл бұрын
As always, really appreciate your work. 👍🏾
@courtneydolly65382 жыл бұрын
Love your videos, thanks for sharing!
@tcmackgeorges122 жыл бұрын
You might want to study Aníbal Quijano concept of “coloniality” it pairs well with this concept
@TheoryPhilosophy2 жыл бұрын
What a coincidence because I talk about that in an upcoming episode about Maria lugones
@tcmackgeorges122 жыл бұрын
@@TheoryPhilosophy LETS GOOOOOO MARIA LUGONES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Im really glad your cover this side of colonialism stuff after Said rtc. As you have probably noticed revisiting, there is big difference between post colonial theory (Said, Spivak, Bhabha, etc.) and decolonial theory (Fanon, Quijano, Lugones, Gordon, etc.) Its not an amazing analogy but I like to say "Post colonial theory is to decolonial theory what post structuralism is to Marxism."
@Phlabberghost2 жыл бұрын
Hey, just curious: do you have thoughts about a possible relationship between this term and Arendts term “natality?”
@Phlabberghost2 жыл бұрын
Sorry-to specify, I mean as Arendt describes the term in “The Crisis in Education.” I’m hearing you suggest that there’s a disciplining gesture inherent in revolution for Fanon, which seems to align him (sort of) with what Arendt complains about in the political role of education in the United States. (I understand if this question isn’t terribly interesting to you)