The Su-33 and Su-34 are the reason I keep m Ru tech tree updated. I just love the flankers with cannards looks, the best looking jets ever built imho.
@gagawin29106 күн бұрын
U forgot Su-30
@SovietUnion_6 күн бұрын
base SU 33 is unfortunately quite outdated, it has the same capability as current SU27S (not SM) and cannot carry fox 3s. Unless we get a rare 2 seater version i dont think its even worth it
@mangosuppe87066 күн бұрын
@@SovietUnion_ Won't be worth it either way, if gaijin even get it's flight model correct (I doub't that even with canards) it will be a S but worse
@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze6 күн бұрын
I am a die hard Russian Aerospace hater, but man is the SU-34 a gorgeous aircraft
@4tbf6166 күн бұрын
@@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze literally me, but flip out the 34 with 33
@rabbaniazzahra17846 күн бұрын
What i want is yak 130, Mig 35, MiG 31, Tu-95 and Tu-16
@STRYKER14676 күн бұрын
Why do you want a trainer without weapons... The Yak-130M/131 would be better suited.
@jonroelofs206 күн бұрын
tu-160 with like 20x fab500s would be sick
@RiflesGunner6 күн бұрын
Imagine the MIM-104 Patriot system in War Thunder
@TheTemplarnight5 күн бұрын
i feel like the Mig-35 is a ways out few more jets to come before that jump but who knows
@_east-german___1325 күн бұрын
@@STRYKER1467 yeah From Russia Yak-130 2019...
@alejo6896 күн бұрын
I just want a Mig-31, even the early version will make me happy
@filimental6 күн бұрын
Since it was cancelled in real life I don’t think we’d get it in the tech tree, but I think it would be really cool to have a premium SU-47 Berkut someday. Maybe as an event vehicle.
@kotenara106 күн бұрын
Probably it will be a premium considering F-20A was a premium
@mythicfour5 күн бұрын
I flew the SHIT out of that thing in Ace Combat! A truly cool aircraft.
@shrk1285 күн бұрын
It flew, and as a technology demonstrator it was very successful. We have much less realistic planes in game in comparison.
@invertedv12powerhouse773 күн бұрын
There are plenty of low prooduction aircraft in game. The su47 did fly for awhile, it could come
@vidbobanec83846 күн бұрын
Su24m2 is already in game... The su24m has a modification called "su24m2" which is the fab500s modification
@TheIrishBread6 күн бұрын
Only thing missing from it is the upgraded pilots hud i think.
@SovietUnion_6 күн бұрын
No, M2 is the modern-ish upgrade to it which allowed it to carry better things and has better electronics
@domkirk44085 күн бұрын
m2 would also have R-73. So the snail fools us again
@hagridflower29075 күн бұрын
@@domkirk4408gaijin does whatever they want with missiles. Mig 29 9.12/13 and G are the best example of that
@10TonneSkeleton5 күн бұрын
@@domkirk4408according to Russian manuals, even Su17m4 and MiG23ML should have r73
@MarshFlyFightWin6 күн бұрын
Love to see my favorite jet, the SU-34 or the earlier SU-27IB Prototype
@southcityflyingcolumn48746 күн бұрын
Su-34 will be on the su-25 line. Tu-22 on the su-24. Mig 31 needs to be added in also
@2goober4u6 күн бұрын
Mig 25 should just be in the game like 6 updates ago
@christopherchartier30176 күн бұрын
@@2goober4uIt would’ve sucked but still, I miss it
@citonhotavares75796 күн бұрын
@@christopherchartier3017 i dont think so. If the mig23 managed to not suck at the game i think the mig25 would be a balanced aircraft
@christopherchartier30176 күн бұрын
@@citonhotavares7579 It’s Just that it can barely hit mach 1 on the deck, it’s fat asf, and it only performs ok at very high alt but it’s climbrate is abysmal. And I’m pretty sure some variants didn’t have a gun/countermeasures
@southcityflyingcolumn48746 күн бұрын
@@christopherchartier3017 sounds like a good candidate for an event vehicle
@CloroxOfficial6 күн бұрын
These form of videos are amazing, keep doing them for most nations and maybe for tanks as well
@StiveGuy6 күн бұрын
SU-30 and 33 are what I'm looking forward to.
@pestomystic6 күн бұрын
Su-30M, Su-30SM, and Su-34 are the big three I'm still waiting for.
@thefinnishstalker6 күн бұрын
Dude you have no idea how much i would give to get an SU-30 rn
@SkullH4T6 күн бұрын
SU-47 for event aircraft would be great
@sleepyfox_72666 күн бұрын
Btw the su24m one of its mods (the gps bomb one) is called su24m2 so... yeah
@adrian_ricky6196 күн бұрын
Still missing modern mfds in cockpit and r73s
@owenreid1046 күн бұрын
Praying they remove the modification and split them
@Thiago--de6ez6 күн бұрын
I actually believe Su-30SM will be the next one, we'll see in December
@mich4216 күн бұрын
So will it be an even worse plane than the SU 27 we have in the game now? being heavier?
@animangaweeb85016 күн бұрын
isnt that the russian version of the indian su-30 mki (flanker-H)?
@Thiago--de6ez6 күн бұрын
@@animangaweeb8501 I guess it is
@Thiago--de6ez6 күн бұрын
@@mich421 It is better in terms of Arsenal, Radar which is a PESA if i'm not wrong, Canards that help at low speed aswell as the Thrust Vectoring, not sure about it's engines and it is heavier.
@SovietUnion_6 күн бұрын
doubt it, every single time gayjoob adds anything its always an inferior first version of it, and then the later one, aka MORE GRIND GRIND NEVER STOPS HELP ME GOD
@Mraskmestuffaboutww25 күн бұрын
sweet! also nice editing :)
@Nero-Caesar6 күн бұрын
As long as we get the fab 3000 glide kit
@Mikoyan015 күн бұрын
My take on this: Added the Su-27K, MiG-29K or Su-33 into the YAK Line as it's now the naval aircraft line makes sense from the immersion perspective, but not ideal in gameplay. After all, these are just heavier Flankers and Fulcrums (except for the Su-33, Flanker with Canard is always sexy). The main difference is that they can carry anti-ship missiles, but we don't actually have ships for them to hit (and it's not like anybody is going to bomb ship in a fighter anyway) Added the MiG-29M or M2s into the Mikoyan line is fine as long as it is added somewhere between the MiG-29 and the MiG-29SMT (there's a big gap there) maybe folder the MiG-29M and M2 into one folder as that the differences between them are too little to warrant a new vehicle. Further suggestion is to add a MiG-25 and MiG-31 somewhere in that MiG line, maybe before the MiG-29 or somewhere between the MiG-29 and MiG-29SMT (for the MiG-31) I like the idea of adding the Su-27SM2/SM3 into the Sukhoi Line, also the Su-30SM is nice (as I said, Flanker with Canards are probably my most favorite gender identity), all of this will culminate in the Su-35 eventually. The Su-25 line is a line for ground attack aircraft, the 'Sturmovik' as the Russians designation goes, it makes sense that the Su-34, designated 'Bombadirovchik' - a Bomber, isn't going to appear in this line. There is, however, one possible addition (a rather poor choice): the Su-25TM, which is considered to be a more expensive and sophisticated upgrade compared to the Su-25SM3. According to its look, however, this is basically the tech tree version of the Su-39. The Su-24 still have more to offer the bomber line with the Su-24M2, and yes, Su-34 should be in there in the future as well. My further suggestion, however, would be the Tu-22M (But then again, having the damn thing launch a stand-off cruise missile that could one-shot a base right after takeoff doesn't feel right.
@kajmak64bit765 күн бұрын
SU-25TM is SU-39 but get this It can be equipped with R-27's and R-77's... which may or may not come to SU-39 SU-24M2 is a mod for SU-24M which gives KAB-500S So since gaijin did an intentional oopsie by not giving us basic SU-24 with first F-111... we don't know if they are gonna give us an actual SU-24M2 so we can have R-73's and stuff on it just like the new F-111's that got added
@XHU524-OFSET56 күн бұрын
I like this type of video, yesterday I re watched your old Russian tech tree video
@Ruskipatzan9076 күн бұрын
You forgot the su37 terminator and mig 24 and 31 Interceptors
@10TonneSkeleton5 күн бұрын
Su37 is basically previous version of modern Su35S, so it's too early to add it.
@chezlocКүн бұрын
The Su-24M2 is a module on the Su-24M that allows it to use the KAB-500S. They arent going to add a Su-24M2 cause the Su-24M2 is already the same Su-24M
@Marco-cg7fb5 күн бұрын
I’d love for the su34 to come into the game. That thing looks absolutely stunning
@goldeneaglemercenary77115 күн бұрын
I think the MiG-35 can be seperated to have PESA and AESA radars individually, kinda like the Puma and its newer iteration with the Spike ATGMs
@adamniva42516 күн бұрын
Matawg the su24m got modification called m2 that gets you kab500s
@adamniva42516 күн бұрын
That means they dont want to add su24m2
@Russão0006 күн бұрын
They shoud fill the gaps btw the other planes we already had, like add planes btw A and C, we jump from the MiG-29 9.13 directly to the MiG-29SMT 9.19, there a lot of other variants instead of adding more of new aircraft
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
@@Russão000 more vehicles for us to research? Pls no
@iantownsend70926 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneli that’s more of an economy thing
@iantownsend70926 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneli besides more minor variance would probably be folded anyway
@Kyleplier6 күн бұрын
I just finished your video about the US tree. Then I find this one had actually uploaded while I was asleep lol
@falloneone67666 күн бұрын
Mat i hope the mig 25 / 31 comes
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
As long as there is multipath the way it is in the game, it's not even worth bringing the Mig 25/31 since they are aircrafts that COMPLETELY rely on radar missiles, they'll probably suffer
@sonwig51865 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneli Multipath is so arse though and the missiles kill you from splash damage if you do it
@kajmak64bit765 күн бұрын
Next thing after Yak-141 is MiG-29Kr ( Naval MiG-29 ) It can also be somewhat an equal to F-18's so if F-18 comes MiG-29KR would too ( R means Russian since normal K is indian )
@srb9726 күн бұрын
The only aircraft I really care about is a mig 31 so I hope they add it
@blackjack86975 күн бұрын
su 33 and su30sm are some of my favourite jets of all time i wish they get added
@oz3146 күн бұрын
SU 15 and Mig 25 both could be added
@Skibidy_rizzler_6 күн бұрын
Its not top tier
@missel-skibidi5 күн бұрын
i love the su34!
@mich4216 күн бұрын
I'm curious how they will implement the thrust vector I've been waiting for it since I started playing I'm very curious
@airlightshockZOV6 күн бұрын
The Su-33 tested the R-27EA, maybe it can get that? Also what if they add the Tu-160 after the Su-24M?
@Russão0006 күн бұрын
R-27EA is the ARH version of the R-27? Would be cool since the R-77 is so fucking bad and the EA would save russia against AIM-120A/C and other longer ranges
@ichosolemanuel60486 күн бұрын
or r77-1 I think has more range
@somerandomboibackup60866 күн бұрын
There is like one R-27EA, just add the R-77-1 at this point
@mich4216 күн бұрын
@@somerandomboibackup6086If they add the 77-1 the other players complain because they also don't have new missiles and then the classic Russia bias comes out.
@kurnass20006 күн бұрын
@@mich421 icl all gajin has to do is make the SU27 and MIG29 have ther accurate flight peformance and they'll be fine, also fix the overpeforming F16
@tinfoilchampion36512 күн бұрын
i would really love a MiG-35, Su-30, Su-34
@thefinnishstalker6 күн бұрын
I would fucking LOVE to get an SU-30 with thrust vectoring. It would be so much fun
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
I prefer that they pull an arrow from the su27sm to the frogfoot line and there they add the su30 because if they decide to add the su30 on the same line as the su27 this will saturate the line since there are many vehicles to research...
@patrickmalzin6 күн бұрын
Mat, what about the Tactical bombers? Tu95 and etc? they couldnt be added after Su24? and Su34 after Su25?
@m3chgeek4705 күн бұрын
Sounds great. For right now I'm having my first issue with launch errors is that a normal thing for this game after updates😂😂?
@chillguy10016 күн бұрын
Hi, I am saying this in the hopes of helping and not to be rude or anything so take it in the manner in which it is intended. Since ik english isn't your first language. In words that that end with "ed" like "navaliz-ed" in this videos example, the E is silent and is not pronounced. Your pronounce it as "navalizd". I noticed this emphasis/inflexion when you pronounce words with ED at the end. The emphasis is on the D not the E. Hope this helps :)
@EmperordovahkiinLord6 күн бұрын
The su-24m2 is already in the game the mod to get the kab-500s is labeled su-24m2
@grimmig135 күн бұрын
Why should we expect that Gaijin will add aircraft capable of supermaneuverability, when they nerfed the existing MiG-29 flight model to the point where it noticably underperforms because of complaints that it's too maneuverable? That would be silly, even for Gaijin...
@missaelovalles86745 күн бұрын
Some sort of next gen version of the SU-24 or the SU-34 will prob be next but the 34 is just to big
@piskoootek6 күн бұрын
Mat, make more videos about what is already in game. Tips, tutorials, kill montages. Different modes (maybe more air sim) But please, less videos about what could come in next patches, potentional planes etc. I think you put out there already enough videos about future. Lets make something different next time 🙏. Anyway, big fan here, love you.
@BinaryKiller_Recoded5 күн бұрын
Su-33 is likeyl the next jet F/A-18A or B for USA and other nations Typhoon (Early) for Germany Typhoon (Early) for Britain I have no idea for Italy, France, Israel, Japan or China
@valstrax_shadow6 күн бұрын
I want a new version of MIG 29 😈
@thefinnishstalker6 күн бұрын
No fuck that Lets get an SU-30 with thrust vectoring, a stronger radar and 12 R-77-1s
@mr_rocketluckit52946 күн бұрын
MIG-25?
@Skibidy_rizzler_6 күн бұрын
It would not be top tier
@missingthe80s586 күн бұрын
Su-27SM3 is next unless Gaijin wants to step straight to Gen 4.5. This jet rocks a PESA radar, same radar as the Su-35 and R-77-1. I highly doubt they plan to jump straight to Russians end game non-stealth jet just yet. I don't mind the Su-33 as 13.0 filler material vs the F-18A but only the Su-27SM3 can compete with the F-18C.
@maumaumau39296 күн бұрын
I am still waiting for my mig 25 i love that plane
@333COBALT5 күн бұрын
What are the possibilities of the berkut being added?
@dannycage86726 күн бұрын
Su-27SM2 and 3 also have thrust vectoring
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
@@dannycage8672 no, they don't, only su30mk/m2, su35/37 and su57 has
@mangosuppe87066 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneli To add on, all Su-30 variants that are Su-30MKI+ have 2D thrust vectoring + canards
@wienaly91365 күн бұрын
After su24 i hope my next dream jet coming Su34
@KaiserHabsburg5 күн бұрын
Su-33 was upgraded to carry R-77
@Doc_Boots6 күн бұрын
I want TU-95. No one would use it in missile thunder but still…..
@levankhocholava77266 күн бұрын
Where is mig 25 or 31?
@havehfoxxo6 күн бұрын
MIG-25 foxbat on the yak141 line
@leventeszekely88046 күн бұрын
Makes no semse at all
@baderq8ty996 күн бұрын
the su7 su25 and yak28 lines are stupid, they should make the tu-14 line for strike aircraft/bombers so yak-28 > su25 >su17m2 >su25T >su17m4 >su24m >su25sm3 >su34, and after the il-28 strike fighter/fighter bombers line so su7s> mig27s> su30, and between the la-200 and su27 they can make it an interceptor line so su-15 early and late and mig25 then between su27 and su27sm add the mig31, dividing the lines by SU MIG and YAK is very stupid it should be by role
@stpbozin82535 күн бұрын
The line were tu14 located is bomber line thats why yak28b is there. And su25 line is strike aircraft line so logically they should put su7 there aswell. il28 should be at ty14/bomber line. But i guess they truing to avoid having big gaps in lines. If you move all by logic then you would have il10 at br5.0 and then next plane going to be su25 at br10.0 for example. Yea they could add more planes to fill the gaps but they decide to make a mess in a tech tree instead.
@baderq8ty995 күн бұрын
@@stpbozin8253 i left the il-28 in there because the il-28sh was specifically modified to be better at CAS so kinda it fits better there instead of leaving it empty and it's before they stick to the role i suggested anyways so they should have it in line before the su7, and the normal il-28 foldered behind the tu-14 actually that is better since it's a pure bomber and so similar to the tu-14, so il28sh 8.0 >su7 9.3, it may not be perfect but it's better than what's going on rn
@_worldx_6 күн бұрын
What do you think about the polish tech tree leak?
@deniskalugin79846 күн бұрын
Well, as for me, if nothing will be done in terms of gameplay (especially in SB regime) these new aircrafts make no sense.
@obeseufo37076 күн бұрын
zawg don't forget to sleep this update cycle
@brettescobar15086 күн бұрын
I wish they added mig31 with r37 missiles.
@somerandomboibackup60866 күн бұрын
What's the point of adding more Sukhois if they're gonna have the same FM as the 27 and 27SM? And why R-77-1 when its historical contemporary is AIM-120D? This game is hitting a brick wall without some absurd balance choice
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
@@somerandomboibackup6086 and the next flankers will be even more heavier so....
@tahmid-uz-zaman22146 күн бұрын
Su-30 would be a good one
@ivanbarbancon87506 күн бұрын
su-33 can carry R-77 AAM btw
@dannycage86726 күн бұрын
It can't, its a 80s and 90s aircraft the navy switched to the MiG-29K after Russia started using the R-77
@ivanbarbancon87506 күн бұрын
Major Général Igor Kishinev in 2019 said publicly su-33 will get a 2nd stage of modernization, concerning engines, radar and the multi-purpose role for su-33. With a new radar (it is said it will be the equivalent of su-27SM2/3), su-33 can carry R-77 and KH-31A -or maybe will they equip it with the No35Irbis radar- This is from an article of 2019
@Darthjarjarexe44 күн бұрын
Next for the Russians should be the Su-30, and MiG-25.
@akiraminagami48626 күн бұрын
Soviet line can have as many shiny stuff as they like, but US main whiners will single handidly crush them and nerf them into hell. Look at what is in game now, worst FM, worst radar and worst Fox3, defining most laughable top tier experience.
@qittfthegame61286 күн бұрын
Realistic Russian air force experience???
@somerandomboibackup60866 күн бұрын
Maybe, hear me out, most Soviet fancy stuffs are demonstrators.... Also 1500 F-15s vs ~1000 Su-27/30/33/35 4600 F-16s vs ~1800 Mig-29
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
@@qittfthegame6128 you're fucking kidding with me bud
@2goober4u6 күн бұрын
@@somerandomboibackup6086 it's a video game, supposed to be balanced
@TheChickenJ6 күн бұрын
@@somerandomboibackup6086are you being serious?
@usarmyalaskanick6 күн бұрын
Wow, no foxbat or foxhound. Interesting
@Rty-q1g6 күн бұрын
Mat when do you think they will add the r77-1 to the game cuz i about to lose whatever brain cells i have left from playing with the r77 (worst fox3 in the game)
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
The craziest thing is to think that even if the r77-1 is added it will be at most on par with the aim120 already present in the game and since they will probably add the aim120c along with the 77-1 then the situation will remain basically the same, the only 77 that is any good is the 77m but this is still far way in the future...
@СергейНикольский-я2ц6 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneliaccording to datamines the 77-1 is already in files and according to its stats in the files it still would have less range than the 120A even against straight flying targets and way less range against manoeuvring targets so I really have no idea why they added initial 77 for the 27SM (never carried it) and for the 29SMT (also never carried 77’s, only 77-1’s and 77M’s). And why tf they added those double pylons for the 27SM that this plane also never carried (it is a feature of the 27SM3 and some Su-30’s) instead of fixing its FM (that was proven heavily underperforming 99999999 times in a sh*t ton of bug reports) and adding 77-1’s for it. I really can’t understand what is going on in their heads.
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
@@СергейНикольский-я2ц It's simple, the country that gives them the most money is the USA, if they fix the flight model of the planes from the west, the Americans will take a beating since the USA mains are the worst in skill in the game and because of that they lose sales... it's like a friend told me "it's impossible for War Thunder to be balanced and accurate while it's a free to play game"
@Rty-q1g5 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneli fk me then i have to buy a usa premium next sales, its time to feed the snail again
@tahmid-uz-zaman22146 күн бұрын
We need R-77-1 that's all we need
@hetoxr6 күн бұрын
imagine they would at something big an with ist stuff like r37💀
@fischkopf35616 күн бұрын
I just hope they add the su 34 next year I need my duck😪
@nicholashritcu72366 күн бұрын
i have given up on the USSR air tech tree, I spaded the mig29smt then it got nerfed and i hate the su27 so i dont bother playing it since imo its trash and then the mig23ml got nerfed soo GRB is my main now
@matheusklowaski21306 күн бұрын
Não me lembro de ter visto isso no seu canal em Pt. nós fomos traidos
@francogaray26495 күн бұрын
isn't there a mig 29 with thrust vector engines?
@kajmak64bit765 күн бұрын
As far as i know there is 2 One is for air show parades One is MiG-35 i am pretty sure it has thrust vectoring but not 100% sure
@sturmovik_806 күн бұрын
For the Yak line they could also bring a Yak-141M with 6 pylons, better engine and R-77/R-73. I mean sure it wasn't built, but it wouldn't be too different to the Yak-141, and was at least planned, unlike other things we have in the game. later they could also bringgggggg Yak-201, which would be basically a soviet F-35 that's more maneuverable, but just like Yak-141M it was never built and also would be more like 5th generation, so it won't come soon if it will ever come. About the Su-33, the russians modernized all Su-33 they have to the level of Su-27SM/Su-30SM, so they could add modernized Su-33 too. Would be interesting too to get a Su-33KUB maybe as event vehicle, it's a bit of a mix between Su-33 and Su-34, but never left prototype status. Was supposed to be naval trainer and heavy fighter/attacker. And i think Mig-29K has actually 5 times smaller RCS than normal Mig-29
@icythrone6966 күн бұрын
Bro add Su 47
@plazmaflare51996 күн бұрын
tf is he gon do he cant add it lmao
@airlightshockZOV6 күн бұрын
@@plazmaflare5199 nah hes a youtuber he can just email gaijin and tell them to add it obviously smh
@nemoclavon5666 күн бұрын
Su-34 will come and then Su-34 as premium frfr
@TallyPatka-dz2cz5 күн бұрын
what is that skin?
@lambertwt10056 күн бұрын
How about Su30 ?
@Johnathan-mj4ei6 күн бұрын
oh boy does Russia have some sexy ass jets...
@dlchockmg48956 күн бұрын
I so much want my baby su47 Berkut 😭😭
@antipathy1626 күн бұрын
Hear me out, su-47
@S071-06 күн бұрын
And yet the will still suffer with their R77
@adamniva42516 күн бұрын
Or they could add r77-1 that is in filles
@lilcj20146 күн бұрын
R77 is pretty good,just not at long ranges. 27er is more than enough
@airlightshockZOV6 күн бұрын
@@S071-0 wait until the R-77-1, infact i dont even think the game will ever be ready for the R-77M, because that thing is by far the best fox-3 as of today
@SuperTitoneli6 күн бұрын
@@airlightshockZOV Meteor still better, but yeah, the r77M is the only r77 that worth it.
@FoxOnixs6 күн бұрын
@@SuperTitoneli and r-77-1
@CallMeAK6 күн бұрын
Foxbat?
@anti_shirk2592Күн бұрын
all I want is su30sm
@Em_Youl6 күн бұрын
Where Su 33?
@RussianZOV3636 күн бұрын
Faz em português
@thatoneguy17415 күн бұрын
Please a newer and better Mig 😭
@mrcsproncho37986 күн бұрын
Where is my foxbat i just want foxbat give me a foxbat plss
@Lulzwhat6 күн бұрын
I remind you guys: No Eurofighter, Rafale, F-18, Su-30, ARM's = no money next year. Warn Gaijin every way you can!
@pierluigiadreani21596 күн бұрын
When I started tò play war thunder because of WW2 stuff...top tier Is mostly and annoying things that distract Is from having cool WW2 battles
@komutanlogarr.6 күн бұрын
We dont care your 60 dollar
@sgtj.peldridge4567Күн бұрын
Nobody cares the games gonna go forward it's not a WW2 game they're gonna have modern things your just too stubborn to change @@pierluigiadreani2159