Introducing the AI Arabic Intensive: Ten weeks of handcrafted then AI-optimized lessons, quizzes and tests teaching you the essentials of Arabic grammar, morphology, and vocabulary-the first of its kind. Starting January 2025. Learn more at themadinanway.org/aiarabicintensive Promo: Be among the first ten students to register for the intensive and receive 15% off. Invite five students to join you, and you won't pay a thing!
@muhammadhaazim2 ай бұрын
Shaykh Yasir Al Hanfi is a great Scholar MashaAllah ❤. May Allah preserve him.
@rehanriaz6202 ай бұрын
@@muhammadhaazim he ain’t no scholar!!!
@muhammadhaazim2 ай бұрын
@@rehanriaz620 and why so ?
@murtazaalam62542 ай бұрын
@@rehanriaz620 Alhamdolillah Sheikh Yasir Al-Hanafi is a great scholar who has refuted Ghairmuqallids/pseudosalafis
@SalmaiChicken2 ай бұрын
Yasir Hanafi is a takfiri
@muhammadhaazim2 ай бұрын
@@SalmaiChicken really and who he declared as kafir ?
@carimaelfarrah78002 ай бұрын
Jazak Allahu khairan for this clear refutation of all the gross accusations made against the Ashari creed on Kalam Allah.
@mohammedumar1472 ай бұрын
Subhanallah
@tafreekladh2 ай бұрын
this was exactly the need of the hour. jazakallah,may allah bless both the shayks.
Alhamdulilah, this was a rational way to refute jake brancatella.
@MuhammadAli-vp7qt25 күн бұрын
Was jake brancatella not a student of dr Shadee ?.
@tanvirbashar307725 күн бұрын
@MuhammadAli-vp7qt I'm not fully sure to be honest
@_Ahmed_W-2 ай бұрын
جزاك الله خير for putting this up Sayyidi
@africandawahrevival2 ай бұрын
1:17:09 I liked particularly br Umar's argument of "Qur'an being protected", how can an attribute be protected, good point IMO. Jazakumullah Khair.👍
@muhammedtrawally17982 ай бұрын
Are you trying to say that Quran is not the word of god?
@africandawahrevival2 ай бұрын
@@muhammedtrawally1798 No one said that, please watch the actual video.
@muhammedtrawally17982 ай бұрын
@@africandawahrevival alhamdulillah no one said so
@mohammedabdirrahmanrubblei91412 ай бұрын
I completely agree the points raised on the onset of the talk by the British asheikh speaker in that these topics aren't for the layman...rather as his teachers professed, should only be studied in the Halaqat of knowledge and thier likes.
@W67w2 ай бұрын
Shaykh Yasir al Hanafi.
@pr0master2 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation
@Flyingtoohardtofly2 ай бұрын
I used to play football with Maulana Yasir. He never used to pass the ball to anyone. 😂
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
He only passed it to good players! 😂
@imrans27842 ай бұрын
We used to have such a player too. We called him Stinge-dano
@waressz2 ай бұрын
جزاك اللهُ خيراً
@xack-t1sАй бұрын
GOD S KALAM is ever flowing. Non stop
@oeshkoer27 күн бұрын
Dont talk nonsese. Is your God still saying to Musa: Take of your shoes?
@Bismillah89522 ай бұрын
ماشاء الله واللهم بارك في امتنا وبارك في شيوخنا ويسرنا لما تحب وترضى
@fadan9502 ай бұрын
Languages as a genus are from Allahs eternal knowledge, hence they are not created,they are abstract, and kalaam is a attribute Allah uses to communicate his eternal knowledge. So the instances of him speaking to creation are haqeeqi not through created means.
@LUQMAAN3082 ай бұрын
Huh?
@chaldir2 ай бұрын
Uncreatedness for other than Allâh SWT ?? Do you even think about what you're saying?
@mohammedwaseem43552 ай бұрын
What on earth 😂
@senapatisri34532 ай бұрын
Check minute 14:56 bro The sheikh talks about the languange
@huzaifasajid75282 ай бұрын
Allah talks whenever he wants , with words that are audible Words of GOD are not created This is the aqeedah of salaf وكلم الله موسى تكليكما
@jimale3341Ай бұрын
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله Is the quran we read كلام الله Allah's speech? Is الم حم عسق are the speech of Allaha? Please give me clear answer.
@adampatel3132Ай бұрын
Zandaqa jahmia
@Mmhs912 ай бұрын
Damn Dr Shady got dominated. Sh Yasir was DEEP!
@omarabbasi2682Ай бұрын
Its an interview not a debate
@MotorWorld-v8y2 ай бұрын
Imam ahlul sunnah Ahmad bin hamble Imam darrul hijra (Malik bin anas) Imam shafi Imam Bukhari Imam safyan al thowri Imam tirmidi The razi Brothers And the list goes on They was not ashari Ashari creed was invented later in time. The salaf of this ummah are the people of Hadith ahlul Hadith All upon the athari creed
@s.anoniem41822 ай бұрын
The Athari Creed is Tafweed brother. This is also a system within the Ashari Aqeedah.
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
You've made such a jahil comment that it's not worth a response!
@s.anoniem41822 ай бұрын
@@abyrahman6610 No. the Wahhabis and the Taymis are juhhaal for following stupid tajseem aqeedah and lying about the Atharis. the atharis are free from your sicknesses.
@MotorWorld-v8y2 ай бұрын
@@abyrahman6610 Well you’ve responded. Go through the comment and check what is so jahil go learn about these imams as mentioned above to know there beliefs
@hasancasperlabuschagne75792 ай бұрын
This comment section is wild. الله المستعان
@sarfarazmir85502 ай бұрын
They think they are very intellectual and have discovered something that will bring Muslims closer to Allah. We should remember that these are the same people against whom Ahmad bin Hanbal (رحمه الله) defended Islam, i.e., the Mutazillah. There is no doubt that the Qur'an is the uncreated speech of Allah. They are discussing matters that the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and his companions (رضى الله عنهم) were not aware of. The person on the left seems so excited to share his misguidance with other Muslims. I doubt he possesses even a single brain cell to understand that engaging in discussions on topics the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) did not address can only lead to misguidance. He believes that the opinions of some misguided scholars are binding upon us, not realizing that only the Qur'an and Sunnah are binding upon us. May Allah protect us from these misguided individuals! The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Whoever innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e. Islam) that is not part of it, will have it rejected." - Sunan Ibn Majah 14
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
What are you talking about! The Asharis destroyed the Mutazillah (and all other deviant groups) ... Remember, there were no Salafis around at that time to defend Ahle Sunnah! As for engaging in discussions on topics that the Prophet SAW did not address, can you show us where the Prophet SAW engaged in discussions on the sciences of Hadiths ie. Which Hadith are Sahih, which are daeef etc, the science pertaining to jarh wa tadeel etc etc??? The Quran and Sunnah are binding upon us but how do you understand the Quran and Sunnah without the scholars?
@sarfarazmir85502 ай бұрын
@@abyrahman6610 So, according to you Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him should have graded his Hadith when he was the direct source of Hadith? 😂You don't even know what you are talking about, with all due respect. Regarding Al-Jarh Wa al-Ta'dil, If there was no need of grading the Hadith, then there was no need of it. You are speaking gibberish. You should think before speaking. Educate yourself before speaking on anything related to Islam.
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
@@sarfarazmir8550 what I'm implying brother is that at the time of the Sahaba (RA) there was no need to have detailed discussions around aqeeda because it hadn't been corrupted. They understood the true meaning of 'laytha-kamithlihee-shey'.. They did not compare Allah SWT with the creation. This became a fitnah later in the ummah, so the ulema had to deal with it and so went into detail about Aqeeda. Go and learn the history of the Deen and then maybe you might understand.
@sarfarazmir85502 ай бұрын
@@abyrahman6610 I'm well aware of the history of different creeds like Athari, Mutazillah, Ashari, and Maturudis. So, I don't need a history lesson on them. You are running away from what you said earlier which was that Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) didn't tell us about the sciences of Hadith. It is obvious that the sciences of Hadith (علوم الحديث) isn't related to Aqeedah. Now, you are saying that you were implying the companions of Prophet (PBHU) had no need of discussing Aqeedah in detail, which is really hypocritical. If you were honest enough to accept that what you said earlier was related to the sciences of Hadith rather than Aqeedah, it would have been great, but it seems you are not honest enough to accept that. I would like to give you a brief history lesson of the Ashari creed because it seems you are unaware of this misguided creed. Speaking of Ashari creed, it emerged from Abu Hasan al-Ashari who was raised in Mu'tazilli household (i.e. the household of Abu Alee al-Jubaa'ee). Later on he reverted from that and started following ‘Abdullah ibn Sa‘eed ibn Kullaab, and refuting the creed while having some of their principles in common. At last, he left all of their principles, and started following the Salaf without having anything in common with the Mu'tazillah. To say that the companions of the Prophet (PBUH) had no need of going in detail in Aqeedah because there was no corrupted creeds at that time, you are just affirming that Mu'tazillah and Asharis are corrupted. These creeds came after the companions of the Prophet (PBUH). So, what I'm saying is that we should only follow what the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions believed. There is no need to ask no sense questions related Allah's attributes because we can't understand everything about Allah. Our mind is limited just as our eyesight is limited. Even the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon, forbade asking too many questions in Islam. I hope you will reflect on what I told you.
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
@@sarfarazmir8550 the point about the Hadeeth is that the sciences of Hadeeth were developed later, not taught by the Prophet SAW yet you depend heavily on such sciences to understand Hadeeth. Similarly, the sciences of creed were developed later to understand creed. As a Salafi, you make the same mistake of over simplifying matters, you can't just go back to the Salaf without the scholars of the Deen. Brother, let's leave it at that as in my experience with Salafis, you end up going around in circles!
@tilmonreeves62752 ай бұрын
Salam, I appreciate this subject. Scientists took a bird and separated it before it was born so it had never heard other birds sing. When the bird hatched and grew then it sang the same song as the other birds in its species. Why? So if the speech was not learned then how? So I question the idea of speech being developed. What if there was a child born and it actually had the language programmed into its soul. Reminds me of the story of Jesus talking as a child. What if the child had a specific “song”. You could make a leap and say that potentially Moses had this “song” imprinted in him. That he is the tablet the commandments were written within. It makes sense. How were the first compassionate ones viewed? The “song” would have been considered weak and worthless. Just like turn the other cheek. Not looking to cause trouble here. Just want to bring some perspective that begins to unravel this puzzle. If he was the most compassionate and merciful then it would be a foreign idea to a kill or be killed society.
@hayderia1102 ай бұрын
Shaykh Yasir is of the Deobandi movement to my understanding. It's important for those watching to understand his perspective being from that perspective.
@MuhammadA347772 ай бұрын
Deoband doesn't have a unique creed, especially regarding the speech of Allah. The sheikh is Ash'ari and is speaking as an Ash'ari here, which is in line with the majority of scholars.
@hayderia1102 ай бұрын
@@MuhammadA34777 They do for various other aspects.
@KiddRocks-lf3ut2 ай бұрын
I actually find the Deobandi movement the most reasonable when it comes to sectarian differences. They are in between Salafi and Sufi ideologies. But that’s just my view.
@MuhammadA347772 ай бұрын
@@hayderia110 nope. Read Qari Muhammad Tayyab's Sharh on Tahawiyyah. Exactly in line with the Maturidi creed.
@hayderia1102 ай бұрын
@@MuhammadA34777 They have varied creed on other aspects.
@foufoua2 ай бұрын
I cant wait next friday for jumu'a. The imam will speak the audience in his nafs because according to these two "kalam" is not only sound and letters but also when you speak in yourself. Can u imagine it ? 25 minutes watching to the imam on the minbar while he only is turning with his head not opening his mouth?
@oeshkoer27 күн бұрын
Dont listen two these 2 clows
@muhammedtrawally17982 ай бұрын
'Allah is free from change inside his entity' what is your evidence? This is the same principle used by greek philosophers like Aristotle.
@omarabbasi26822 ай бұрын
Are you serious?
@ibnawesome2 ай бұрын
Salams are you Omar Abbasi from DU Buffalo
@muhammedtrawally17982 ай бұрын
@@omarabbasi2682 just go and study the unmovable mover by Aristotle, you will realized what am saying
@omarabbasi26822 ай бұрын
@@ibnawesome No but i help Dr Shadee
@yourstruly57062 ай бұрын
What evidence do you need, everything that changes is hadith. It then goes back in a universal cycle, for God to God and free of the cycle would require him to be independent of the cycle. If that happens then, you wouldn't exist.
@YAMIN-m6v2 ай бұрын
intro audio please
@jimale33412 ай бұрын
Is Allah mutakalim? Is the quran qe read from Fatiha to Alnas, not speech of Allah? What is the speech of Allah.
@TherealStevenSeagal2 ай бұрын
Shadee the barelwi
@qurandaily1002 ай бұрын
What did Mossa alihi as salaam hear? Was it kalaam nafsi or kalaam lafdhi. If it was the later, which is created, did Allah tell Moosa alihi to worship His created speech by saying أعبدني.i.e. worship something created. Also can the shukooh name a single sahabi who said kalaam of Allah is nafsi and lafdhi.
@oeshkoer27 күн бұрын
What about asking them whether God in his inner speech is eternally adressing a non-existant Musa ?
@ReturningRuh26 күн бұрын
@@oeshkoer كن فيكون
@rehanriaz6202 ай бұрын
Alhumdulliah for salafia!!!
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
The first 3 generations? YES! Today's group? NOOOOO!
@MadinahLivin2 ай бұрын
These guys literally said speech is created SubhanAllah, the Quran you read is not really what Allah spoke. Alhamdulillah for recognizing the deviance they are upon
@ibrahimmohammedibrahim92732 ай бұрын
What your response about allah teaching the Adam the names of angels..? That language of the teaching are transmitted to children
@xack-t1sАй бұрын
LANGUAGE OF GOD ARE THE MANIFESTATIONS OF GOD USUALLY THEY ARE SOUNDS.. FROM SOUNDS LANGUAGES CAME FROM.. KALAM OR SOUNDS ARE NOT LIMITED TO SOUND OF BELLS ONLY...
@JoeDurbs2 ай бұрын
Please do not bring any uluma on your channel who think the ummah are stupid.
@oeshkoer27 күн бұрын
Dont take knowledge of these fake shayks. lets see what Ibn Hajar says in his Fath Al-Bārī 15/465-467. He writes; والرابع قول الكرامية انه محدث لا مخلوق وسيأتي بسط القول فيه في الباب الذي بعده والخامس انه كلام الله غير مخلوق انه لم يزل يتكلم إذا شاء نص على ذلك أحمد في كتاب الرد على الجهمية وافترق أصحابه فرقتين منهم من قال هو لازم لذاته والحروف والأصوات مقترنة لا متعاقبة ويسمع كلامه من شاء وأكثرهم قالوا انه متكلم بما شاء متى شاء وانه نادى موسى عليه السلام حين كلمه ولم يكن ناداه من قبل والذي Translation: The fourth: is the view of the Karrāmiyya that it is newly uttered (muhdath), not created (makhlūq)… And the fifth: is that it (the Qur’ān) is the speech of Allah, uncreated, and that He has been - since before creation - speaking whenever He pleases. Ahmad expressed that in Kitāb al-Radd ‘ala Al-Jahmiyya. But his disciples have split into two factions: One of them says: that it is inseparable from His being while the letters and sounds are on an even plain (muqtarina), not following one another in a sequence (muta’āqiba). And he allows whomever He pleases to hear His speech. However, MOST of them said: ‘Verily He is one who speaks (mutakallim) with what He pleases and when He pleases. And when he summoned Musa (صلى الله عليه وسلم) when He spoke to him He had not summoned him prior to that time [in pre-eternity].” (end translation) Here we see that Ibn Hajar acknowledges that the Hanbalis have split into two groups, and that actually Ahmad and the MOST of them are at the same view as the Karaamiyyah and the Taymiyyan/Salafi view. The minority Hanbali view is semi-kalaami stance, which was refuted by the most of the Hanbalis. So it is one BIG LIE, claiming that Taymiyyah/Salafi view is not the same as the Hanbali view, whereby it is exactly the same as what the view most of the Hanbalis is. Note: The view of Karaamiyyah is the same as the view as Ahmad and the most of the Hanbalis except that the Karaamiyyah were upon the view that Allah was not ever been like that, and that He aquired the ability to speak after not having it, then became the one who speaks whenever He wills.
@MuhammadAli-vp7qt25 күн бұрын
You are the Clown here ,you are a arrogant ignorant Wahhabi /Salafi Takfiri Jihadie Mentality Ideology propagandist figure.
@IbraheemDiaz2 ай бұрын
وَأَمَّا تَحْرِيفُهُمْ: {مِنْ ذِكْرٍ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ مُحْدَثٍ} [الأنبياء: ٢] ، فَإِنَّمَا حَدَثَ عِنْدَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَأَصْحَابِهِ لَمَّا عَلَّمَهُ اللَّهُ مَا لَمْ يَكُنْ يَعْلَمُ خلق أفعال العباد للبخاريّ As for their distortion of the verse: {A new reminder from their Lord comes to them} [Al-Anbiya: 2], it [the revelation] only occurred during the time of the Prophet, peace be upon him, and his companions when Allah taught him what he did not previously know. If you’re using this ayah as evidence, then it appears that Imam Bukharis speech here applies to you also. Ask yourself, how similar are your views to the Jahmiyyah?
@IbraheemDiaz2 ай бұрын
The point is that it was محدث for the Prophet ﷺ and the Sahabah who had never heard it before
@JoeDurbs2 ай бұрын
I don't like uluma who say things should only be discussed in a class room. They are controlling the religion. Do they think we are stupid. I will never listen to a person like this.
@abyrahman66102 ай бұрын
You don't understand what they mean. They are not 'controlling' the religion! They simply mean that such topics are intricate and require a certain level of pre-requisite knowledge in order to understand, otherwise a person risks committing blasphemy etc. Nobody is stopping you from learning these subjects, it's not hidden. Rather, such subjects should be studied in context in an academic manner.
@koroglurustem17222 ай бұрын
Every type of field has expertise to it. If you don’t have the background knowledge, yes, indeed you will not understand most of it. You may understand the used words but not the composite meaning.
@saadhorsepower89082 ай бұрын
Will you explain calculus to a 3rd grader? No! Understanding calculus requires you to understand a lot lot more before. First you teach the 3rd grader, algebra and how equations work. Then you slowly teach them more and more, so they don't get confused.
@shahshareef2 ай бұрын
How about do a podcast with this Devbandi about whether Allah can lie or not?
@PEACEMAKER1LUVEMAAN2 ай бұрын
If you’re not for unity tawheed then you’re riding with the devil and helping him. Plain and simple.
@mohammedwaseem43552 ай бұрын
@shahshareef This is a barelvi issue, they're the ones that keep bringing it up. I've never seen any deobandi discussing this in private or public
@mohammedwaseem43552 ай бұрын
Why don't we have a podcast with you and ask you if your father is really your father? @shahshareef
@zahidhakim57272 ай бұрын
Shareef Sir, don’t peddle your misinformation
@zaismail7862 ай бұрын
Barelvis ignorance is just epic. A'LA Hazrat did definitely distort the facts. His works destroyed the unity of the Ummah of Rasullullah SAW
@fadan9502 ай бұрын
So if arabic and languages asa a genus are created than the very word الله ، is created😂 so in pre eternity how did Allah describe himself? The ashari creed has so many flaws in it, their intent was good though, but in the end they are just an off shoot of the Mutazilites (Arab Platonians/aristotlians)
@LUQMAAN3082 ай бұрын
"Describe(or description)" is an explanation of some quality/attribute isn't it? So the Quality is there and was always there. The description in our time came in the form of words in various languages or manners of expression etc. in that time we don't know and don't need to know as the description/manner of expression can change in whichever way or language you want to
@mohammedumar1472 ай бұрын
Leave it to the scholars. Or maybe go and sit with these scholars and read the texts with them as they proposed in the video
@fadan9502 ай бұрын
@@LUQMAAN308 so the word Allah is created or it was his name eternally
@fadan9502 ай бұрын
@@mohammedumar147 so Allah gained the name Allah after creating arabic?
@carimaelfarrah78002 ай бұрын
@@fadan950 are you suggesting the Creator depends on His name for existence? Is an arabic name what makes God who He is?
@rayaankhan24942 ай бұрын
Ashaa'irah 💀💀
@MuhammadAli-vp7qt25 күн бұрын
Was jake brancatella not a student of dr Shadee in the day before..
@MM-mc8hs2 ай бұрын
Wallahi, listening to these two speakers I felt like vomiting. Pure misguidance and deviation The extent that they will defend their Greek philosophical foundation is unreal
@ReturningRuh2 ай бұрын
You can call it misguidance, but you’re just making a claim you can’t back up. The Sheikh brought proofs and you brought nothing.
@muhammedtrawally17982 ай бұрын
@@ReturningRuh'Allah is free from change inside his entity' what is your evidence? This is the same principle used by greek philosophers like Aristotle. This is one proof of his misguidance
@ReturningRuh2 ай бұрын
@@muhammedtrawally1798 because He’s Eternal. It’s not even Greek philosophy at that point. Eternal Attributes and Eternal Dhatt don’t go through changes
@muhammedtrawally17982 ай бұрын
@@ReturningRuh the attributes of god are of two types, the attribute of the self(sifat zat) and attribute of actions. For example god's speech, he has the attributes of speak which is eternal and he can also speak any time he wants. Saying that if god speaks it undergoes changes, and changes necessitate dependency and so in is just a mere claim with no proofs.
@ReturningRuh2 ай бұрын
@@muhammedtrawally1798 You don’t understand the position being made and how it’s explained hence why your response doesn’t follow. The claim wasn’t “if God speaks it undergoes changes and changes necessitates dependency” Quote verbatim what was said