What is Trespass to Land? | Intentional Torts | Torts

[@cissebura5322]

the sections read earlier to they also apply to common law principles or fall within the American constitution

[@marleystjohn]

Excuse me sir, however I beg to differ on your assertion that an individual who has simply flown a camera drone in the airspace above another persons property is most certainly HAS NOT COMMITTED A TRESPASS WHATSOEVER. The example you have cited here is not supported not is it congruent with any common law presidence or any other lawful statues and/ or laws Within the jurisdiction of The United States of America. There may be some unlawful and misguided local ordinances that have attempted to wrongly criminalize the use of camera drones within certain cities and towns, townships etc. However I would point of the simple and unambiguous fact that the recognized airspace above any properties or locations in the United States and it's territorial holdings are under the exclusive and complete control and perview of the FAA and the Federal Government and are therefore governed by the applicable rules and regulations set forth within the CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS EXCLUSIVELY AND SOLELY. Stop misleading information that is in part responsible for the public mistakenly believing that the use of drones within the United States and all of the states and counties, towns,cities, townships and jurisdictions within is in anyway unlawful as long as one does adhere to the federal regulations and rules of the FAA. I would request this of you and all other person's on behalf of myself and all other aviators a.k.a. pilots who make use of drones professionally or as a hobby. Thank you very much. please see ; §40103. Sovereignty and use of airspace (a) Sovereignty and Public Right of Transit.-(1) The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. (2) A citizen of the United States has a public right of transit through the navigable airspace. To further that right, the Secretary of Transportation shall consult with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board established under section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 792)

[@Sierrz]

You’re going down.

[@robrowe6322]

A temporary invasion of airspace by aircraft over land of another is “privileged” so long as it does not unreasonably interfere with persons or property on the land. Sneed v. County of Riverside, 218 Cal. App. 2d 205 (4th Dist. 1963) Flight by aircraft in the airspace above the land of another is a Trespass, if: entry into the immediate reaches of the airspace next to the land is involved, and entry interferes substantially with owner’s actual use and enjoyment of his land. Drennen v. County of Ventura, 38 Cal. App. 3d 84, 88 (2nd Dist. 1974) So……..You’re wrong and you should take down your comment in shame. Bravo, you really thought that you were educating someone with you’re ignorant rant huh…😂

[@marleystjohn]

@@robrowe6322 However, if the person is acting a good faith and pursuant to federal law, when operating a drone or other aircraft recognized by the FAA as a legitimate use of the airspace above any public or private property, the federal law will supersede any other jurisdiction or other federal agency or state agency or local government. Therefore the example you have provided here would not apply.

[@CynthiaLovato-x4g]

why do cps investagaters ignore the signs and still come on some elses land without permission