What It Takes to Score 175 | Thinking LSAT, Ep. 443

[@ericsilva-gomez2481]

Gonna summarize the video real quick for you all: hard work

[@davidmiranda6097]

Nathan is a boxing trainer who’s not afraid of putting on gloves and throwing bows. He knows how to read between the lines and great at conveying to students. He can chisel a future legal Tyson for anyone not intimidated to get in the ring with him. Ben is a cool diplomat. They complement each other well.

[@TraumaTizedLOL1]

Great analysis of the two. I love Nathan’s no BS approach and his explanations on LSAT demon. Ben is good too. Perfect duo

[@violinperson1835]

I absolutely love how halfway through the video we start talking about the American addiction to debt and the fleshed tax credit system 😆 👏🏾 I could listen to y’all talk about that for days!

[@futurelawyernyc]

Can Nathan not interrupt Ben and let him finish what he was saying lol

[@DrRCStone]

No. Why?

[@wifeandmother2012]

I wish lac would give a test option with games and without

[@johntbh5855]

It might be seen as discriminatory against blind test takers if the scores end up being slightly higher.

[@Vik8152]

1:15:29 yeh but to say that you’d have to assume the school is worth the tuition amount they’re charging, which they are not.

[@davidmiranda6097]

Milk toast is bland. Like someone who eats toast and drinks milk on NYE is bland.

[@nav6593]

u guys talk a lot of gibberish and very less objective solutions. proposals are very vague. try to be professional

[@earltaylor6071]

You guys are doing a great job covering this topic and speaking on the unfairness that exist for poor White,Black,Hispanics and other marginalized groups. Keep up the great work guys.🕍🕌👍🏽

[@lraoux]

It’s not biased against color; it’s biased for the privileged.

[@amalaltareb2122]

But the privileged have been mostly white.