What's Really Going On In Our Universe? (Cosmological Principle)

[@TheoriesofEverything]

Main episode with Julian Barbour: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKHVqaV9lstjhdU As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit www.economist.com/toe

[@dougsmith6793]

You're doing an excellent job here, Curt!

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

A piston without a cylinder does no useful work... Obviously... If something does no useful work then why even think about it as a concept‽

[@robertm3561]

Barbour is right about the second law to be wrong. Forces(laws of nature) create symmetry(order) & for ex explosions create(increase) disorder.

[@michaelbartlett6864]

He's talking about the differences between "closed" and "open" systems.

[@spearshaker7974]

Like a spark gap is that closed or open?

[@michaelbartlett6864]

@@spearshaker7974 An open system has NO boundaries and a closed sytem has fixed boundaries, like a box.

[@spearshaker7974]

@@michaelbartlett6864 yeah I get the concept but a spark gap in a circuit would that be considered open circuit?

[@spearshaker7974]

@@michaelbartlett6864 I’ve wondered this for year don’t mean to dump on ya but was hopeful for answer if there is one.

[@michaelbartlett6864]

@@spearshaker7974 In electronics an open represents a lack of connection between two points, but it can be bridged or jumped by increasing the voltage potential difference between them. It's how a spark plug works by raising the voltage difference across the gap by tens of thousands of volts.

[@sitindogmas]

know enough to completely challenge any given theory before you begin to judge anything this gentleman saying, instead of passing judgment with your assumptions base on what you've heard or slightly grasp

[@crucifixgym]

Homie was just thinking outside the box

[@skihik591]

He's basically talking about Negentropy correct? Bernard Steigler talks about this a lot in his recent work which bridges the critical social and systems theory. This makes intuitive sense as well. The Earth seems to get more and more ordered despite entropy from unicellular life to multicellular systems, etc. Curt, I recently discovered Ira Livingston who works at the Pratt Institute in NY in intersections of science and literature/media studies. He wrote a book "Poetics as a theory of everything". Maybe check him out! Thanks for your work!

[@ywtcc]

It's difficult to define order and disorder except in opposition to each other. Has physics become more orderly, or more disorderly over time? It seems to me, that going from Newtonian to Heisenbergian, involves recognizing the disorder at the edges of the order we're projecting on the universe! Does the universe appear more or less disorderly to a photon? This is a universe in an instant. A simpler perspective produces less order, but less corresponding disorder. A unitary view on the universe isn't one with pure disorder, or pure order, it's one with a lack of distinction between the two.

[@doubleslit9513]

I like how Kurt breaks down these key points from thinking individuals or what I believe they use to call “scientists” before everyone began “doing their own research”. Still, I’d appreciate an extra five minutes of further breakdown for the those of us who know how little we know.

[@thomastmc]

The 2nd law applies to scenarios that do not correlate to our universe. This never made sense to me. The universe has obviously gained order and complexity since the big bang.

[@debyton]

Attempting to construct the universe from the universe is the first original mistake.

[@LionAstrology]

Thanks for another video.

[@nileshmodhwadia8646]

Good one Curt!

[@TerryBollinger]

Julian Barbour, it’s nice to see you on KZbin again. While I first asked you this question in the 2014 Golden Webinars video, I must bring it up again: Why have you never addressed your introduction of negative mass and energy in your version of dual universes? On the first page of your initial paper on dual (“Janus”) universes, you appropriately credit Jennifer Chen and Sean Carroll for coming up with the dual universe idea in 2004. You then introduce a simple equation fundamental to everything that follows in the paper, including the emergence of time: “vanishing total energy E_tot = 0”. That is not Newtonian physics and also is not supported by the 2013 Ellis and Gibbs reference you used to support it. If you don’t believe me, look at the paragraph after equation (80) on page 24: It’s not there. Ellis and Gibbs only address vanishing momentum and vanishing angular momentum, both of which are fully Newtonian. In a relativistic universe where mass equals energy, you cannot drop in E_tot = 0 without adding the concept of true negative energy. That is why Ellis and Gibbs don’t do it. Ironically, I fully accepted the idea of negative mass and energy and used it as the basis of my 2007 dual universe theory. (This was before I found out about Chen and Carroll.) I’ve gone way beyond that first approximation. I now assert that the weak-force-blind Standard Model particles are fleeting instances of negative mass particles in our universe in which a slight excess of positive-mass, weak-force-aware fermions dominates. Our partner universe - our contraverse, to use my terminology - reverses this situation to give full CPT symmetry for the sum of the two universes. This pairing resolves the problem of missing antimatter in an exceptionally clean fashion. Still, I cannot emphasize this enough: You need to be _explicit_ about what you did with your invocation of E_tot = 0. You have the right general idea, but it only works if you face the implications of negative mass and energy head-on. There is nothing Newtonian about a universe in which mass becomes a vanishing quantity, and you cannot explain the emergence of time without digging far deeper into the particle physics created by slightly off mixes of positive and negative mass fermions.

[@kayakMike1000]

I think we have barely the vaguest clue of what's really going on.

[@andrzejmalachowicz8583]

„Out of the box” Pierre Marie Robitalla talks about this in context of our current models of the gaseous stars No boundary to hold the gas so the thermodynamics is different. He proposes a liquid model etc. I am sure you have heard of him and his Kirchhoff law dismissal (NYT full page add he took paying almost all of his savings: not that’s how you publish your work !!!)

[@duggydo]

I watched the full video. I got the impression he's a bit off the deep end based on some of the comments he made. I expect Curt was thinking the same thing based upon his facial expressions.

[@USSpitfire]

Not too surprising: it reflects “mind map” in obsidian, as it becomes more “mapped out” and interconnected.

[@stevehoward1980]

Faster than light particles show illusions When unused then motion creates Used model's !

[@stevenverrall4527]

In a statistically uniform macroscopic volume, pressure can be defined as force per unit area OR kinetic energy per unit volume. These two definitions are equivalent and a physical bounding surface is NOT REQUIRED! I taught this in my freshman physics courses for many years...

[@jayb5596]

Information is a product of these fundamental interactions, energy, structure, polarity.

[@club213542]

energy, frequency and vibration maybe like Telsa said?

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

@@club213542 No, that was Tesla. Your Telsa was the boingity-boing-boing guy.

[@kyran333]

Consciousness is an information system

[@club213542]

@@kyran333 is it or just our interface within this quantum space? but then why would our observation affect it? maybe consciousness is what gives order to the quantum flux....

[@Killer_Kovacs]

The box works because somehow angular momentum emerges in spite of all things moving at the speed of light at the big bang and space being "infinite"

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

And vice versa. Fer shure.

[@SkyDarmos]

OMG, he was in a documentary proving that the cosmological principle is wrong, and here he is pretending that it is right. Unbelievable.

[@p0indexter624]

re: @ 10:00 ish, the 2nd isn't axiomatic doesn't Maxwell's demon demonstrate proof of concept ? doesn't life exemplify the concept ? 13.7 billion years after the big bang the most complex form of matter in the universe appears in the form of life. that's us folks. yet the universe is careening toward entropy? your guest is on to something !

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

Thank you for asking. No on all points. Maxwell's demon needs to be fed, both energy and information about the stuff he is sorting. He's a net net consumer. Life on Earth takes in energy that would otherwise have been stopped locally and rebroadcasts it into the darkness at radio frequencies. To the folks out there, we're Hitler opening the 1936 Olympic Games.

[@starchild2121]

His first claim about the universe looking the same in any direction has never been shown from where that claim comes from. I have been hearing about that claim for over 30 years now and never has seen an actual picture that demonstrated that claim.

[@vickydixon7512]

(1/2) = Phi, that's why philosophy was named after it. Philosophy was once the study of proportional relationships in the universe, Phi being the Greek word that contains the coordinates for all radii in our universe which converges at (1/2). All polarity requires that point without that point that would be no up there would be no down that would be no left or right, there would be no hot or cold, that would be no light that would be no darkness, there would be nothing without Phi which is invariant across universes. All universes require it in order to have a spatial coordinate relative to one another, they don't exist at the same point, they are divided by distance relative to their probability densities which are universally concentric/radial it extends away from one point and leads to another, it always has a point from which it comes from, nothing pops into existence, it follows that path "Phi".

[@poormanagement1722]

Picture 3 diamonds connected at the point revolving around that point add frequency and light and “formation” occurs.

[@ManyHeavens42]

Why hasn't anybody said Geological Not Theoretical Geology is the Shadow of things to come 🌎🌍,

[@arnoldmuller1703]

Einstein just gave a definition of what a theory is. A model that within its basic concepts of applicability will be never overthrown. This is the constructivists defintion of a theory. Newtonian mechanics was und will be never overthrown within its basic concepts of applicability. (On a side note: If internal inconsistentcies (logical errors etc.) appear it was never a theory to begin with.) Relativistic effects fail to "contradict"/overthrow/replace Newtonian mechanics since they exceed basic domain of its applicability. This is all fairly basic philosophy of knowledge.

[@NashBrooklyn]

we have learned that no universe expands due to 3 main universal rules - it must deform in order to avoid its collapse, it must reorient internal magnetic fields, and must cut off portions of universe in order to gain mass and later reorient such portions towards the great attractor which causes the universe to deform to avoid its collapse - this never ending mechanics of the universe (or for better word - any universe) are the foundation for all universes - the big bang never happened - but instead it is a constant syphoning a particle vapor from one universe to another via worm tunnels behind black and white holes - the reason why time slows down to almost a halt on the surface (edges,horizons,orbits - call what you want - the end result is the same) of black and white holes is due to the fact that when atomic formation of elements has not yet materialized from a fusion of the particle vapor inside electromagnetic field (aka plasma or dark matter) - that prolonged moment is timeless/infinite - can last millions of years when we convert that to already materialized atomic formations (aka any matter - not dark matter) - so the time has only 2 states after that - present and past - or as we call it - pure time and corrupted time - in other words, the time begins when there is matter - and time gets corrupted when matter is destroyed - but its atomic formation still present but not accessible any longer - so what can access corrupted time? - same thing that got it materialized in the first place - which is plasma (aka dark matter) - now we come to what we call today as a god particle - which is a misnomer from the get-go - maybe on purpose or not - but it is not a particle of any sorts - it is a plasma link that has direct reach to its motherload - or rather it's place of birth/origin in space - the actual walls of universe (aka antimatter) - the antimatter keeps universe sealed as our satellites already measured its temps - it's over 10K - hotter than sun - so most of the lights we see in the sky - are not really stars - but the shimmer of the universal walls - surely there are millions of stars in space but they would never shine as galaxy rivers - besides we dont even see 70% of entire universe as earth is blocked by ZOA (zone of avoidance) which does not let us see the actual center of the universe - which is what the great attractor is - and that is where all stars are headed to in their universal spin/spiral at the same time - long story short - the life as we know it - has no magical beginning - the 6 corners of the universe had 6 planets with salty oceans - all of them gave birth to humans as the last stage - dna with immune and cell division are the only ingredients to human lifeforms - in order for them to incept life (aka biohazard buildup) is frequency of plasma - the higher it gets the more photons it emits - and since photon's side effect is photosynthesis which leads to overheat... TBC

[@darrenmonsiegneur5310]

Any state of matter or consciousness will always be a segment/fraction of reality. Akin to light as a reality in relation to the electro-magnetic spectrum. The dichotomy in knowing the true reality is you have to be in a state to see it- and no state can see the whole. The only way to grasp it is to dissolve into being it. I refer to interconnectivity or the Buddhist teachings on emptiness.

[@duytdl]

What does he mean very few people in cosmology know about Newton? Has he chatted with Alan Guth?

[@doubleslit9513]

I’m no scientist, but excuse me Professor when I ask, “Are you telling me no cosmologists or physicists have ever literally not thought outside of the box?” 📦 🤔 Hard to believe.

[@Joe-sg9ll]

explain chop chop. I demand it

[@stevenpiehl6199]

Myself and my colleagues are always battling the good doctors theories. Here we completely disagree and give his contingency no credit in our field of physics.This is quite prevalent and we’ve stalled out.

[@jpwski9425]

Dziękuję za wiedzę, pozdrawiam Sercem ...❤...

[@jeffreyluciana8711]

"Let me tell you what's going on in the universe" says every physicist on KZbin

[@MargotDobbie]

Was just about to say the same mate

[@rikimitchell916]

Scale invariant self similarly, fractality

[@NathanDean79]

“If your theory conflicts with the 2nd LAW of Thermodynamics, It’s Wrong.” -Richard Feynman.

[@vickydixon7512]

The 2nd law of thermodynamics is correct (1/2) = Phi, that's why philosophy was named after it. Philosophy was once the study of proportional relationships in the universe, Phi being the Greek word that contains the coordinates for all radii in our universe which converges at (1/2). All polarity requires that point without that point that would be no up there would be no down that would be no left or right, there would be no hot or cold, that would be no light that would be no darkness, there would be nothing without Phi which is invariant across universes. All universes require it in order to have a spatial coordinate relative to one another, they don't exist at the same point, they are divided by distance relative to their probability densities which are universally concentric/radial it extends away from one point and leads to another, it always has a point from which it comes from, nothing pops into existence, it follows that path "Phi".

[@andymachala999]

I would like to posit that there are differences in areas of the universe because civilizations in some area have used dark energy as a power source and used it up in those areas.

[@Joe-sg9ll]

sure why not. If you're going to make up energy might as well pretend how it's used

[@m4inline]

Ahhh. This guy. He is right, of course. But who will connect him with Wolfram, and who will advocate for them when New Physics becomes mainstream?

[@DetectiveStablerSVU]

Is New Physics an actual movement or subsert of research that's recognized, or are you using that as a general term? I ask bc i want to look at it. I can see Eric Weinstein championing the attention of what you seem to be referring to. I could also see him putting it down lol. He often talks about his issue with the stubbornness of modern psychics and feels there is no room given to reevaluate aspects of it, especially areas that have significantly more support than their evidence justifies.

[@jnrose2]

Anomaly of Janus Point (as presented in this short Barbour piece) .. an unbounded universe allows for more extreme MaxEnt than a boxed universe. Barbour is mis-rendering Logic. Obviously “Complexity” is allowed and naturally generated, but that ‘allowance’ cannot invalidate … diffusive diminishing of ‘work potential’. !!!! Or supersede it as Primal Rule. -- I think he sees many important interpretations (such as … variety is important in complexity schemata) .. but ‘max variety’ is disastrous as a goal proposition .. ( in an extreme condition - nothing is ‘similar’ to anything else) !!! (Another form of max disorder). jnrose2. [General System Theorist]

[@doubledigital_]

If you think hes bonkers, I always wondered how it worked ( see horizon and maxwells demon .. YT vid ) how the demon could work out what is in fact what in terms of choas / order.// made no sens and still dont lol.!

[@jamesstaggs4160]

So the laws of thermodynamics don't work in infinite space? Is he saying the "box" is the universe?

[@carly09et]

The laws of thermodynamics depend on countable finite. Infinite space is dividing by zero, something that is problematic. You need a continuity to make sense of this, but physics can't find it.

[@margaretneanover3385]

Always thinking hot aren't you? Interesting, the one avoided was cold as well. Yet it's said the main vast of spacial temperature. Perhaps the sun works both or one is a source away from light and heat . The shape is determined in all the planets minus the outer edges and the one mishaped of same had the collapse of atmospheric loss that rose outward as the belt . Still the spherical point remains whether water or earth. Even as a drop that loses it shape along the fall , the oceans and large bodies form around the grounds to hold the shape. Varied differences to see how mechanical it is .

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

@@margaretneanover3385 Good start. It'll work with a bongo drum or a xylophone. Your choice.

[@chrishicks8347]

If the box isn't there the universe falls apart. Your design for this system if you mess the system up you won't fit in the other system. And why would you want to be? You barely understand what you're dealing with here. I want to try to explain to you the way I want to design a new water electric system for the world. And I want to design it this way because I want to balance the world. And yeah I said balance it. But I want to give the Earth nervous system. I wanted to use the water as the cooling system the fluid to help it move electricity for the obvious jobs it does and it'll travel though on a fungus a mushroom a bacteria. I haven't decided yet I think a fungus would be the best one because the way they work with trees. But I want to send the electric through the water line at the same time and each house could tap the electric and water line Plus if it is done right the organism that holds the electric will also create a gravitational force and push the water. I need to move the water on the planet to fix the planet. I want to push Africa back down into the ocean a little bit deeper by moving water back on the land growing crops growing food growing weight. We can fix this planet so quit worrying about the rest. But I need to understand how different systems work and I don't have that much time to figure all this out my own. Now what I need from you guys though it's kind of odd but it's an experiment. I believe if I can get 30% of the population will say to a 160 IQ. It almost needs to be 200 but I know what I'm working with so 160 IQ. If we get 30% of the population that high it should help the hive mind for the rest to get intelligent. I believe humans are hooked together like a wi-fi system. The same as the test with the rats where one group learned something and another group somewhere else learned the same thing. If we could get the human population 30% of the 200 IQ the rest would be at least 1:30. And can you imagine what you could do with the world of geniuses. You guys could help me figure out how to ride gravity. That is the only way you're going to travel to space is the right gravity you're not going to speed of light you got to go faster. And you're going to have to have gravity to hold your atomic structure together so you're going to have to ride gravity. but I'd love to talk to you guys cuz I think if we educate the right way we can get people at least 160. Pass it along with your academia and see how many think it's an idea that could be saved. I know you won't find much on me because I didn't want you to. I'm just a regular guy that's really smart. My teacher was Nikola Tesla

[@richarddavis2605]

The 2nd law is more of a guideline 😂 very much a statistical result. Stephan Wolfram talks about it too, and I think evne some mainstream thinkers are too

[@stationary.universe.initiative]

early universe is religious idea

[@DetectiveStablerSVU]

The cosmological principle evokes the nature of fractal patterns, being self-similar structures repeating across scales. This connection resonates deeply with my intuitive sense, drawn from psychedelic experiences, that fractals are intrinsic to the architecture of reality. From the microscopic to the macroscopic, these patterns seem to reflect a universal truth, woven into existence at every level.

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

"From the microscopic to the macroscopic, these patterns seem to reflect a universal truth, woven into existence at every level." Yup: pure Owsley '67.

[@S1DEWALKSCH0LAR]

Wow 😳 what if the box isn't compenent to the molecular formula design because of environmental interferences &we are definitely altering the state with pollution and toxic chemical dilution ratio that begins the serious debating what this guy is digging into, I'm sure this could be happening in changing everything we thought before

[@hangtime1111]

No black hole is equal so the energy taken by a black hole and the movement created by it isn't the same anywhere so the universe can't be the same nowhere

[@chrishicks8347]

Remember your expansion theory is only from The view that you are looking at. The Earth is not in the middle of this whole universe. And you can never have an accurate perception of the whole universe because it never stays still everything moves all the time no matter what. Think it that's why you're sitting on your chair but you know you're moving you know they are moving you know the grounds moving you know the solar systems moving you know the Milky Way is moving you know you're always moving. It's part of evolution. But you can never have an accurate perception of anything of the universe because you're never in the same spot ever. When you started reading this if you read it you've moved in the moment of time you just don't realize it because you're not realizing everything's moving. I repeat nothing will ever be in the same spot that it is right now right now right now you see what I mean. Because evolution always keeps it going forward keeps it as a self-feeding machine. Making God happy if your religious. But you can never have an accurate perception of the universe because you would have to literally go above it or outside of the universe to ever see the universe. And if you actually could do that you're still taking the universe with you so you're still part of the universe. I don't think it can be done I don't know. The universe is really freaking big I know that. And evolution is the meaning of life I can prove that you can't show me anything that is an evolution everything and I mean everything is evolution. But I am watching this cuz I want to try to prove my theory of speed of gravity. And this is a different way to look at it

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

Guess Mrs. Grundy never taught you about paragraphs.

[@liamweavers9291]

I've been saying the universe is an electromagnetic field for years but you haven't been listening 😂

[@MATTHEW-u8c]

Entropy does not flow in one direction, and we observe this all of the time (entropy does not exclusively flow towards disorder). Please see my theoretical framework attached herein. Please note that the video is a summary & segment of an ongoing thought experiment that I am conducting, which omits significant prior work that I did. I specifically redefined time, defined R, and redefined gravity as exclusively potential energy, among other things & solving other problems. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4uopJyHirBnntUsi=-ds8R191wm1_iSGg

[@KaliFissure]

Quantum Cyclic Cosmology A homeostatic universe maintained by the reciprocal processes of electron capture and neutron infall at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids. Time is a compact dimension. This not only creates limits, and the gradient between those limits that we call gravity, but it connects those limits, and enforces conservation of energy. Neutron in at event horizon Because of electron capture Infalling at c it drops off its kinetic energy as mass for the event horizon The neutron information/identity takes an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions, event horizon, to lowest energy density point of space where the quantum basement is lowest and easiest to penetrate. Free neutron out in deep void soon decays into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, proton electron soup in a Rydberg state. This decay from neutron 0.6fm³ to 1m³ of amorphous monatomic hydrogen is a volume increase of around 10⁴⁵. Expansion. Dark energy. And then it begins to fall. Towards an event horizon. Loop

[@V1brationCanine]

all systems are closed if your perspective is large enough all chemical reactions are physical reactions if your perspective is small enough

[@wulphstein]

Maybe if Steven Greer and some of these physicists got together, they could figure out some alien physics that might involve a warp drive.

[@electrodynamics]

The Economist has become the worst form of propaganda outlet in recent years. Personally advertising that political filth destroys this channel's reputation for me.

[@SamuelDimitrij]

For someone who’s not from the US, in what way is that the case?

[@electrodynamics]

@@SamuelDimitrij Recognizing propaganda when you see it is the big challenge these days. www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=834,quality=80,format=auto/sites/default/files/20200328_LDD001.jpg

[@charlesblithfield6182]

Does Maxwell’s Demon require a box?

[@davidrandell2224]

Homo- sapiens: What hubris. The cause of gravity was discovered/published 22 years ago. You know; at least pretend you have heard of the “Internet.” Profound and pathetic ignorance on both of these wannabes. Hilarious.

[@pinkfloydhomer]

What hubris to think you are right and everybody else is wrong. Why are these comments filled with people who believe blindly and without evidence in their favorite pseudoscientific theory?

[@davidrandell2224]

@ Any accelerometer- slinky, water balloon or phone app- experiment Proves the earth is expanding. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything. Read first then comment.

[@pinkfloydhomer]

@@davidrandell2224 pseudoscience, easily debunked

[@davidrandell2224]

@@pinkfloydhomer Do the experiment ,then. Put up or shut up.

[@pinkfloydhomer]

@davidrandell2224 do you understand how science works? Reproducibility, peer review etc? Look into it. The science community never ignores a relevant theory that explains unexplained experiments or predicts new results. Everything you describe is well described by GR.

[@enlongchiou]

(n*(n-1)*(n^2-5n+18)/4! + 1)[area] - n*(n-1)/2[line] = n!/(n-4)!*4! + 1 [point]: equation describe system, 2^n=2^(n-1) + 2^(n-2) + ....+ 2^1 + 2^0 + 1 is it's entropy for qubit of AI have GUE formation between random [GSE] and order[GOE].

[@MargotDobbie]

Was about to say the same. 😅

[@chrishicks8347]

This gentleman has a thing for Newtonian I got a question because this is a theory that I just been playing with. What is the earth's core is not iron ore but actually nocturnal. And the Earth and other planets are actually just neutron stars in a really advanced collapse. It would explain a lot of the materials that would explain the neutrons that go through the planet so easily. No I didn't know neutrons in gravity have a lot to do with each other but I'm not going into details of gravity. But I often wonder if the Earth itself is just a neutron star in collapse it has a lot of the same characteristics. And I would also explain how gravity gets increase frequency and volume. But just think of the Earth as a collapsing neutron star see how that theory dabbles around. I'm not even a big fan that the Earth is filled with lava I think it's actually water that when it hits the mantle it creates friction and that's what melts The Rock. If you get too massive oceans spending the opposite direction that would create your own centrifugal force to hold the planet wobbling or balancing. I don't know I'm just playing with that idea but neutron star instead of a planet. Enjoy

[@808bigisland]

A wholly unfounded delusion.

[@TheDAT9]

You are not going to figure it boys, until you introduce the spiritual element

[@cgivensldr]

As Humans, we will never discover the Firmament. Evidence suggests Intelligent Design.

[@xxredshiftxx]

If the universe is a simulation , all your theories are pointless

[@poel80]

@@xxredshiftxx why? Even if it is, it is still fascinating to study its structure. Honestly I do not really understand why people are fascinated by it. Even if our reality is simulated it is the only reality we will ever have, and it is full of wonders!

[@DrVickyHarris]

Wtf would the code be describing!!! These laws!! Duh

[@grognardgaming8952]

Is there a TLDR? This guy is boring and rambling. I follow the concepts and science but Im 5 minutes in and cant figure out where the hell hes going with all this boredom and I dont want to invest another 7 minutes into trying. I need a summarized point FIRST and long exposition AFTER. I hate trying to absorb information from long rambling explanations.

[@_SPKer]

If you're confused by these concepts, it's probably best to take a few steps back pending more research. More often than not maintaining understanding in modern physics is a rollercoaster of tedium, and boredom. It IS however, worth your time.

[@chillyshotorbitus5152]

Try then "Thermonuclear Scattering" concept. It unifies and simplifies understanding, deletes singular paradoxes by model of spatially expanding [SPACE] with protons, planets, moons, stars, galaxies due to matter/energy collection in their nucleus. In this perspective TIME - constantly ongoing energy/mass transformation can rather go slower (large scale objects), but also FASTER for super accelerated microscale. Voila ! It's so simple and sad at same time how many minds work for nothing.

[@dsharpness]

The "middle ground" -Twilight Zone intro...🩻

[@ryanwis2350]

Science should try to recreate tesla tower and make free energy

[@merlingeikie]

Of course, the Climate doom proposition depends on a closed grenhouse system, which does not exist. 🇦🇺🪃🌏🧬🙏🏹🥷🇮🇱✅️